Top Banner
Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010
21

Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Dec 16, 2015

Download

Documents

Eduardo Brewton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development

Class 2 and 3July 27, 2010

Page 2: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Theories: Organizational Behavior

1)Classical Theories: Weber – the ideal bureaucracy Taylor – scientific management Fayol – universal management principles

2) Human Relations Approaches: Hawthorne Studies

3) Human Resources Model: McGregor- Theory X and Theory y Likert – System1 to System 4

4)Open Systems Theory

5)Contemporary Developments: Community-based Organizations Japanese management Top Quality Management (TQM)

6) Contingency Theories

Page 3: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Think about an organization and its target population that you would design.What theories would you use in developing this organization?Please explain why you would use certain theories.

Page 4: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Strategic Planning

1.Why is it necessary?-Strategic Planning describes the process of addressing change-Usually conducted every 3-5 yearsImportant to involve all stakeholders

2.Circumstances that invite strategic planning

-a threat to the organization-when things are going well can be used to “think outside the box”

Page 5: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

3. Barriers to effective strategic planning-process may consume time and energy

-dormant or residual problems may surface

-staff may resist introspection

-effective managers embark on strategic planning to improve performance,stimulate thinking about the future, encourage teamwork, handle organizationalissues, and provide a sense of renewal!

Page 6: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

4. Developing the strategic plan

a) Getting organized

b) Conducting an Analysis

c) Develop a Mission Statement

d) Ask Fundamental Questions

e) Conducting a Resource Audit

f) Examining Critical Issues

g) Drafting the plan:

Page 7: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Draft plan includes:

1.Mission statement2.Vision3.Goals to be accomplished in 3-5 years4.Internal strengths and weaknesses5.External opportunities and threats6.Critical issues facing the organization7.Action plan for each critical issue8.Accountability : timetable for each action item

Page 8: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Steps to follow for successful strategic planning

1.Determine why you want to develop a plan2.Ensure that the organization’s leadership is committed to the process3.Form a strategic planning group4.Analyze your situation SWOT5.Develop a vision for the future6.Prepare or revise mission statement7.Identify most critical issues for the organization8.Prepare action plans, with 3-5 year goals9.Draft a plan to be reviewed by stakeholders10.Implement the plan with the intent of modifying as changes arise11. Update the plan annually

Page 9: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Questions for discussion:

1.Your organization provides socializing opportunities for older adults who like in public housing. Recently, the public housing authority has offered you a considerable amount of funding to include single, disabled adults who reside in public housing and who could benefit from your agency’s services. Your mission statement focuses on senior citizens. What should you do?

2. Your organization has been developing part-time jobs for high risk teens still in high school. You have provided counseling and tutoring to students who have been involved in sub- stance abuse, as well as those who are performing well and likely to go to college. Due to funding cutbacks, you must reduce the number of students in your program. You are faced with the difficult decision of which students you will serve in order to be responsive to the companies that are committed to hiring these students.. How would you determine priorities for which students you would serve in the program?

Page 10: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

B. Designing and Developing Consumer-Oriented Programs

1. Logic Planning Model (LPM): Using Social systems AnalysisLPM is designed to plan for, achieve, and demonstrate program effectiveness

- in LPM, various elements in a human service organization are related to each other to produce results

- inputs: client inputs and resource inputs- throughputs: activities or interventions provided by the agency-outputs: number of service units the agency provides-outcomes: positive change that occurs (initial, intermediate, long-term)

-pathway: sequence of structured contacts as clients move through the system

Page 11: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Outputs: direct products of program activities that measure the VOLUME of work accomplished. Focus of an output performance measure is on service.-material unit: (e.g., one home-delivered meal)-episode unit: (e.g., one interview with client)-time unit: (e.g., one hour for home health aid program)

Agency aggregates these performance units across all clients receiving services;Producing monthly or annual reports

Examples of output performance measurements:-number of counseling sessions-number of educational materials distributed-number of meals provides-number of community meetings held-number of clients completing a program-number of seniors completing short-term treatment plans-number of children completing preschool education

Page 12: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Taken alone, output units are insufficient measures of accomplishmentsOUTCOME MEASURES: a measurable change in a clients life achieved

between entry and exit of a program; resulting accomplishmentsare attributable (at least partially) to a human service program.**

Examples of outcome measures:1.Service data: job placements; decline in child abuse; performance at or

above grade level; homeless persons obtaining housing; children placed with adoptive families within 180 days of receipt of referral

2.Standards for measuring outcomes: preschool behavior rating scale; parent attitude survey; knowledge scales and aptitude tests

3.Level of functioning scales that measure outcomes: ratings of mentally ill on decision making and interpersonal interaction; ratings of foster

youth on independent living skills and communication

4. Client self-reported satisfaction as a measure of outcomes-satisfaction among clients who were treated or provided services

Note: Client satisfaction measures are useful, but may not be objective

Page 13: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Establish Initial, Intermediate, and Long-term Outcomes

Initial outcomes: first benefits a client experiences, closely related toa program’s outputs; immediate changes in participant’s knowledge,attitudes or skills (e.g., students’ participation in a tutoring program and greater participation in school activities)

Intermediate outcomes: link the program’s initial outcomes to long-term change in behavior that results from participant’s new knowledge, attitudes or skills (e.g., in a school dropout program: regular attendancein school and passing to the next grade level)

Long-term outcomes: changes in client’s quality of life (improvedparenting, job stabilization, high school graduation) that are measuredat a designated follow-up time, 6 mos., 1 year, 2 years after completingthe program to determine whether initial gains were sustained. E.g., welfare recipients may be placed in jobs at the end of the program, butmay not be employed 12 months later.

Page 14: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Illustration: LPM for employment training program designed to enable welfarerecipients to obtain jobs

Long-term outcome: Participants remain on job 12 months after completing the program

Intermediate outcome: Participants are successfully placed in jobs

Initial outcome: Participants learn how to conduct a job interview ; they develop skills

Outputs: Participants regularly attend 12 weeks of intensive training; participants meet with mentor twice a week for 12 weeks; participantsare placed in internships 20 hours a week, for 10 weeks.

Throughputs: Program provides classes on grooming, job interviewing, wordprocessing; provides trained mentors; provides supervision for internship

Inputs: Department of Human Services identifies participants for the program;Agency provides instructors, manuals, teaching materials, mentors,internships

Page 15: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Evaluating Outcomes: The LPM provides a way for managers and outsidefunders to evaluate the extent to which organization achieves itsintended impact

For each expected outcome, can determine how the outcome was achieved by providing quantitative indicators:

Example: evaluate program providing transitional shelter for homeless familiesand children in a given period (1 year)

Outcome 1: Families achieve residential stabilityIndicator 1: 90% of families pay their rent on timeIndicator 2: 86 % of families pay utilities n time

Outcome 2: Adults and families obtain job skills and stable employmentIndicator 1: 88% of adults are employed full-timeIndicator 2: 85% of adults are enrolled in job training

Outcome 3: Families achieve greater self-determinationIndicator 1: 72% of participants maintain sobrietyIndicator 2: 90% of families compete individual case plan

Page 16: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Evaluation:final report – documents outcomes compared to projectionsdiscrepancies lead to questions:

What resources are necessary to make program more successful; should we alter out client input; modify our interventions; should number of units be increased; modify our outcome measures to be more realistic?

Page 17: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Summary:

LPM helps managers critically examine how elements of a program are connected.

Start with the desired state or target outcome and work backwards to figure out what needs to be done to reach the target.

What program elements are critical to what we want to accomplish?

What program interventions need to be modified or improved to reach Our objectives?

What new program components should be developed to meet our objectives?

How will we define success at initial, intermediate, and long-term intervals?

Page 18: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Developing a Market Planning ModelMPM provides a framework for responding to service consumers’ wants and needsMPM focuses on what consumers want and how the agency can meet those needs

-An effective manager conducts a competition analysis to review whether other agencies are offering similar services to the same clients

-The focus on consumers is at the heart of a market-driven approach

-Consumer feedback can be obtained through focus groups and surveys

Page 19: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Summary: Elements of a Good Design (combines both LPM and MPM)

1.Services are consumer oriented2.Design spells out outputs and outcomes to be achieved3.Design makes explicit assumptions and maintains a logical sequence of events to ensure positive client outcomes4.Program is designed with a marketing perspective, special emphasis on being responsive to consumer needs5.New programs fit the organization’s mission6.Organization has good feedback mechanisms (focus groups, surveys, etc.)7.Organization considers the needs and influence of external factors and influences

Page 20: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Questions for discussion:

1.A meeting has been called of representatives of United Way, local mental health board, local health department, local substance abuse board, and public schools. The intent is to explore whether to create a centralized in-take system in several neighborhoods involving these organizations to serve needy families.

What are the pros and cons of setting up a centralized office?

2.What ways do you think are best for obtaining client input and feedback on agency services?

3. What do you think about a market driven approach to guide social services?

Page 21: Strategic Planning and Program Design and Development Class 2 and 3 July 27, 2010.

Develop a LPM for your newly created program. Specify inputs, throughputs,outputs and Outcomes (initial, intermediate, long-term)

Discuss ways in which you would incorporate the MPM into your new program