Top Banner
Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc . www.EnergySEER.com Lippman Consulting Inc www.LippmanConsulting.co m Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas Production and Prices New York Energy Forum November 1, 2010 Ron Denhardt Chief Executive Officer, SEER Vice President, Lippman Consulting Inc. [email protected] 781 756 0550
17

Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc. Lippman Consulting Inc Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.

www.EnergySEER.comLippman Consulting Inc

www.LippmanConsulting.com

Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas Production and Prices

New York Energy Forum

November 1, 2010

Ron DenhardtChief Executive Officer, SEERVice President, Lippman Consulting [email protected] 781 756 0550

Page 2: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER2

A Brief Commercial Message

SEER provides a complete energy forecasting service. Our products include short term monthly outlooks and long term scenarios.

SEER has made many correct calls that have been sharply different from the forward market.

Lippman Consulting Inc. (LCI) provides daily natural gas pipeline flow data that estimates natural gas production, imports, and natural gas consumption.

LCI also provides natural gas production models that model over 100 types by vintage. LCI’s new monthly shale model provides a valuable tool for estimating the impact of a changing rig count on natural gas production from shale.

Page 3: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER3

A deep recession and a surge in production have driven natural gas prices below the level reached in the 2001-02 recession.

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

$/M

MB

tu

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Henry Hub Prices

Page 4: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER4

Low prices are expected to continue as a result of optimism about natural gas production from shale. Once again the view of the natural gas future has shifted radically.

Until 2000 natural gas costs were low because excess reserves and production capacity was developed in the 70s and 80s. There was great optimism about supply. However, increased utilization of natural productive capacity and declining reserves were signaling a tightening market. For the first time in over a decade the industry had to develop gas supply from new exploration.

In 2000 prices jumped sharply but production did not respond. Analysts then decided the US would have to import large volumes of LNG and gas price forecasts were increased sharply.

Many of the same players who were wrong in the 1990s and the last seven or eight years now claim the huge low cost shale resource base will assure low prices for decades and that the US will not need LNG imports. Cheniere has received approval to export LNG using domestically produced gas.

Will they be right this time? From Chesapeake Energy “Investment community short natural

gas (in fact, hates natural gas now and forever)”

Page 5: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER5

There are seven major North American shale plays – Barnett, Haynesville, Fayetteville, Woodford and Marcellus in the US and Horn River and Montney in Canada. Also, Eagle Ford is now hot because of liquids content.

Page 6: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER6

Natural gas production from shale increased 2.85 Bcfd in 2009. The projected increase in production in 2010 is about 4 Bcfd and in 3.3 Bcfd in 2011.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Marcellus

Eagle Ford

Haynesville

Fayetteville

Woodford

Barnett

Source: Lippman Consulting Inc.

Page 7: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER7

Attractive economics, joint ventures and a rush to purchase land, HBP provisions are driving shale production.

$16 billion of funding raised during the last year through acreage joint ventures

Many joint ventures make much of the cost of developing natural gas production from shale a sunk cost.

High prices for acreage $10,000 to $30,000 in Haynesville and upfront bonuses add to the sunk cost.

Hold By Production (HBP) provisions specify a three-year time frame to drill and begin production with a 25% royalty for each section, which is typically defined by 640 acres.

But, because of low prices, many producers are claiming they will only develop reserves required by JVs and HBP until prices increase to $6.00 per MMBtu. The strategy is to shift to drilling rich gas and oil but the ethane market is limited by chemical production.

Page 8: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER8

Monthly Natural Gas from Shale Production Model

Existing Production by Vintage

Horizontal Rigs by County

Rig Efficiency

Lag to Delivery

Wells First

Delivered

Production Profiles

Monthly Production

Permits

Economics

Note annual model does 100 types (shale, coal seam, deep, shallow, location) in similar format.

Page 9: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER9

Low prices are slowing the growth of the horizontal rig count but liquids rich Eagle Ford is growing rapidly and Marcellus continues to grow.

0

50

100

150

200

250

2008 2009 2010

Fayetteville Haynesville Barnett

Woodford Eagle Ford MarcellusSource: LCI

Marcellus

Eagle Ford

Haynesville

Page 10: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER10

First year decline rates in the sample below were 60% for Barnett and 87% for Haynesville. We are modeling 80% Haynesville.

Production Profiles

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27

Month

Ha

yn

esvil

le

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Ba

rne

tt

Haynesville Core Barnett Core

Page 11: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER11

Based on the projected rig count, natural gas production from shale will increase about 3.3 Bcfd but the monthly growth in production will decline during the year. Note the early months are locked in by past drilling.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

JA

N

FE

B

MA

R

AP

R

MA

Y

JU

N

JU

L

AU

G

SE

P

OC

T

NO

V

DE

C

MM

cfd

Eagleford

Barnett

Woodford

Marcellus

Haynesville

Fayetteville

Page 12: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER12

Other than Haynesville in Louisiana, low prices have not slowed down permits.

Natural Gas Drilling Permits

0

100200

300

400500

600

700

800900

1000

2009 2010

Haynesville TX Haynesville LA Eagle Ford

Barnett Fayetteville Marcellus

Page 13: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER13

Sharp declines in non-shale production will be required to offset a loose supply-demand balance.

Weather adjusted storage injections suggests the market is 2-3 Bcfd looser than last year. LCI and Bentek show September Year over Year production growth of 6% to 7% or about 4-4.5 Bcfd.With demand growth 2-3 Bcfd, production growth explains the looser supply-demand balance.Weather adjusted storage injections indicate storage would end March at a record of 1,900 Bcf and our full supply demand balance at 1,700 Bcf with a 500 Bcf swing from heating degree days 10% above or below normal.

-4.0%

-2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

Feb-J uly May-J uly

Annualized Production

Growth Rates

EIA Bentek LCI

Page 14: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER14

The gas rig count will have to average about 750 during the next 12 months to keep production from growing. Given the lag between drilling and the delivery of gas, the rig count will have to decline quickly or drop well below 750.

Non shale production declined 4.3 Bcfd from Feb 2009 to February 2010. The average annual decline was 2.9 Bcfd. The gas rig count averaged 750. At least half of the decline occurred in the Gulf onshore (2.1 Bcfd) and Mid-continent (.7) Bcfd with the other areas declining .2 to .3 Bcfd each.Henry Hub prices averaged about $4 per MMBtu during this period and $3.50 per MMBtu excluding the winter.Rigs are more productive now and HBR may require lower prices this time.

Non Shale Production

(Bcfd)

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

2008 2009 2010

Production Data?

Data is adjusted for hurricanes

Page 15: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER15

GOM production would decline .6 Bcfd in 2011 with current rig count

GOM Production versus Gas Rigs

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

2008 2009 2010

Bc

fd

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Rig

s

Producton Rigs

Page 16: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER16

Price forecasts range from 15% below NYMEX to 20% above.

The low price argument is based on rapid technological advancement, slow economic growth, sunk costs, and attractive resources.

Higher price arguments:

Full cycle cost of conventional supplies

EPA review, taxes, water, and limited access could raise costs.

The impact of the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) which could cause 15-20% of coal fired plants to be shut-down.

Costs under and decline rates are understated, Expected Ultimate Recovery (EUR) is over stated.

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

$/M

MB

tu

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Henry Hub Prices

High NYMEX Low

Page 17: Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc.  Lippman Consulting Inc  Anticipating Changes in US Natural Gas.

© SEER All rights reserved.

SEER17

Closing ThoughtsNear term natural gas prices are likely to stay below equilibrium prices because of sunk costs of both conventional and un-conventional production. Even when HBR is no longer an issue, it will be hard for companies to tell stock holders that we are going to sit on the land that has been purchased and not use it.Low prices could lead to over optimism about long term supply and cause poor investment decisions.There is little question that natural gas shale has changed the game but the track record of long term projections and scenarios is abysmal.There could be substantial value in developing early warning signals of market changes via rigorous models when appropriate and less detailed approaches when the data will not support detailed modeling.