STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA INDONESIA, TATIK SURYANI STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA – INDONESIA TOWARD HEALTHY ORGANIZATION BY IMPLEMENTING GOOD UNIVERSITY.

STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA INDONESIA, www.perbanas.edu

TATIK SURYANI

STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA – INDONESIA

TOWARD HEALTHY ORGANIZATION BY IMPLEMENTING

GOOD UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE (GUG)

BACKROUND

THEORITICAL REVIEW

METHODOLOGY

ANALYSIS & DISCUSSION

CONCLUSION

STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA INDONESIA

BACKGROUND

ONLY HEALTHY HIGHER EDUCATION (HE) ORGANIZATION HAS SUSTANABILITY AND GAINING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE.

HEALTH INSTITUTION COULD ONLY DEVELOP IN A HEALTHY SYSTEM THAT ENCOURAGE A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO MANAGE EACH INDIVIDUAL BECOMING EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION, WITH CLEAR RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

--- NOT MANY HEIs CAN DO THAT, ESPECIALLY IN PRIVATE HE

THEY PERCEIVE THAT CREATING GUG IN UNIVERSITY (AMONG THE DIVISION) IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY, BUT RELATING WITH THE SHAREHOLDER (FONDATION) ARE NOT THEIR AUTHORITY.

THEY PERCEIVE THAT ONLY THEIR FOUNDATION HAS POWER TO MAKE DECISION ABOUT GUG.


WHY?

HOW ABOUT THE FACT ?


To explore the perception about the importance of GUG from the top management perspective

To elaborate the constraints to implement it

To explore implementation GUG in managing HE.

SCOPE ONLY IN PRIVATE HE IN CERTAIN REGION IN INDONESIA WHO GET ASSISTENCE TO SET GUG

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE


THEORITICAL REVIEW

University governance described as a set of relationships between the management (including among division), board of directors, stakeholders and shareholders (foundation) of HE institution.

There are a number a techniques and strategies that are required to create a sound university governance infrastructure. These are:

- the university values, codes of conduct and other standards of appropriate behavior and the system used to ensure compliance with them


THEORITICAL (Cont…)

A well-articulated HE strategy The clear assignment of responsibilities and

decision-making authorities, incorporating a hierarchy of required approvals from individuals to the board of directors

The establishment of a mechanism for the interaction and cooperation among board of management of HE and the board of foundation.

The mechanism of control systems, including internal and external audit functions.


THEORITICAL (Cont…)

Financial and managerial incentives to act in an appropriate manner.

Communication system (appropriate information flows internally and to the public).

The structure of university governance.


RSEARCH METHODOLOGY

RESEARCH DESIGN Descriptive research Ex-post factor research

VARIABLES The importance of university governance in

their managing activities The authority of top management HE during

GUG implementation.


VARIABLES….

CONSTRAINT AND LIMITITATION FOR IMPLEMENTING GUG FROM PERSPECTIVE TOP MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE HE

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GUG

THE PERCEPTION AND STRATEGY OF BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE HE IN CREATING HEALTHY ORGANIZATION


METHODOLOGY….

METHOD OF DATA COLLECTING ----FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION

METHOD OF ANALYSIS QUALITATIF METHOD DESCRIPTIVE METHOD


RESULT AND DISCUSSION

• 43% of sample classified in university or institute, and 57% HE institutions are categorized non university form. •58% have students under 2500, and 42 % have more 2500 students• 64 % of HEI institutions established less than 10 years old.


RESULT AND DISCUSSION

93 % PERCEIVE THAT GUG IS VERY IMPORTANT, BUT ONLY 46 % OF THEM BELIEVE THAT IT CAN BE IMPLEMENTED.

ALL RESPONDENTS STATED THAT THEORITICALLY IT SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED

IN CONTEXT INTERNAL INSTITUTION CAN BE IMPLEMENTED WELL, BUT IN RELATION WITH FOUNDATION IS VERY DIFFICULT.


RESULT Cont….

Why private HLEIs don’t implement GUG in relation with their foundation?

Because they are reluctant with their foundation. Because they perceive that it’s not their right to

establish the system who regulate their relation. Because of the limitation of resources --- > GUG internal in management can’t be

implemented well.


STRATEGY

TO ESTABLISH BASIC REGULATION (STATUTE, STRUCTURE, PROCEDURE IN SYSTEM MANAGEMENT).

- ORGANIZATIONAL CHART - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM - FINANCIAL SYSTEM. - CONTROL SYSTEM ( INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL - OTHER SYSTEM TO ADOPT THE UNIVERSITY VALUES, CODES OF CONDUCT

AND OTHER STANDARDS OF APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND THE SYSTEM IN MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY.

BASIC PRINCIPLES ARE : TRANSPARANCY, ACCOUNTABILITY, RESPONSIBILITY, AND FAIRNESS

•Collaboration, communication, equality, synergy, among people or part of organization

•Empowerment

•Participative management to achieve organizational health

•Decision making system

INTERNAL POLICY


• Proactive approach, not adaptive and

responsive

• Based on the principle of partnership, equality, horizontal competition to achieve quality and competitiveness

• Balance of contribution between external impact, organizational health, harmony and capacity to improve performance

EXTERNAL POLICY


CONCLUSION

GUG is not only regulate the relation in internal of HE but also with the shareholder (foundation) and other stake holder.

It can be realized it all stakeholders have ability and willingness.


Thank you


STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA INDONESIA, TATIK SURYANI STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA – INDONESIA TOWARD HEALTHY ORGANIZATION BY IMPLEMENTING GOOD UNIVERSITY.

Documents

board of management

implementation gug

gug implementation

importance of gug

implementing gug

board of foundation

university values

management perspectiveto