NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PLATFORMS (NISP) TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN ST&I POLICIES: Brazilian NISP analysis and perspectives Roberto C. S. Pacheco; Vinícius Medina Kern; José Salm Jr; Denilson Sell. Second Workshop Buenos Aires, May 31, 2011 3 rd Background Paper – Regional and international practices for disclosing information related to innovation and social environment impact of business. Project “OPENING UP NATURAL RESOURCE-BASED INDUSTRIES FOR INNOVATION: EXPLORING NEW PATHWAYS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA”
43
Embed
ST&I National Information System Platform: the Brazilian case of Lattes
In this presentation we address the issue of why innovation funding data are generally poor to support strategic studies. Generally they come from information systems designed to help only part of the processes of a national (or regional) innovation system. We present the main lessons learned from the Brazilian ST&I system projects, particularly Lattes and Portal Inovação.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PLATFORMS (NISP) TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN ST&I
POLICIES: Brazilian NISP analysis and perspectives
Roberto C. S. Pacheco; Vinícius Medina Kern; José Salm Jr; Denilson Sell.
Second WorkshopBuenos Aires, May 31, 2011
3rd Background Paper – Regional and international practices for disclosing information related to innovation and social environment impact of business.
Project “OPENING UP NATURAL RESOURCE-BASED INDUSTRIES FOR INNOVATION: EXPLORING NEW PATHWAYS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA”
2
AGENDA
• Where were we in 2010?• Why innovation data is bad and what can we do
about it?1. How innovation data are created?2. What are the lessons learned from Brazilian ST&I
information projects?• Conclusions
3
Where were we in 2010?
How to use innovation funding data to study alternative pathways for Natural
Resources (NR) use?
In our first meeting the issue was:
4
The first studies showed that we could not use the data…
“We need to put more emphasis on case studies, because the data is really bad”
But we concluded that:
Why innovation funding data is bad and what can we do about it?
In our paper we tried to answer the following question:
How innovation data are created in a national ST&I system?
What are the lessons learned from Brazilian ST&I information projects?
1.1a Innovation data is designed to attend the sponsors…
Innovation data format is impacted by the way the sponsor agency understands the role of information in the national (regional) ST&I system.
An information system developed to help a funding agency depends on how this organization conceives the national (regional) innovation system being funded…
1.1b How to know the sponsor agency view of the NIS?
NIS conceptual (nonlinear) models
Indu
stry
Government
Companies S&T infraesrtructure
Sabato´s triangle
UniversityGovernment
Jorge de Sábato
Henry Etzkowitz
Triple Helix OECD Systemic Model
LoeLeydesdorff
Pacheco, et. al. 2010
• We need to know the public sponsor view of NIS (is it linear or nonlinear?).• Is the sponsor agency willing to treat information systems in the same way?
9
10
CGEE
Dep
ts Labs
InvestorsPDP, PIB
RNP, Portal Inovação, Plataforma Lattes
Education andTraining System
Culture
NIS components
Environment
Innovation Law
Product and factorMarket conditions(ex. demand for engineers)
STI
STI researchers
STI R&D Groups
FINEP
Firms
S&T
Government
Petrobras
CNPq
MCT
MDIC
CENPES
ABIPTI
BNDESANPROTEC
ABDI
SINAESMEC
R&D groups at CENPES
ANVISA ANEEL
Communication infrastructure
1.1c How to design a national ST&I system model?
This was the view we adopted in the Portal Inovação project in Brazil: it is a platform because it considers all innovation players
1.2 Where and how innovation data come from?
Why innovation funding data is bad and what can we do about it?
How innovation data are created in a national ST&I system?
How were Brazilian ST&I information systems developed?
2.2
2.1 How ST&I information systems are developed?
18
2.1a ST&I Systems are called CRIS
Current Research Information Systems (CRIS)
“Any information tool dedicated to provide access to and disseminate research information.
It covers projects, people (expertise), organisational structure, R&D outputs (products, patents, publications), R&D events and R&D facilities and equipment.”
[Eurocris organisation, 2006]
19
2.1b A ST&I NISP = i CRISi
National Information Systems Platform (NISP)
“´A coherent array’ of information subsystems with the capacity to intercommunicate” (Aines, 1968).
By “coherent array”, NISP implies in CRIS diversity: NISP is not a centralized computerized information system.
Why a platform? NISP is a Platform when its set of CRIS form a coordinated view of information systems that interoperate, exchange services and identifies the user univocally.
20
2.1c NISP include e-Gov systemsE-Government
Application of information and communication technologies to support government activities
The use of technologies to improve how citizens, employees, partners and government interact and conduct business. [Koh et al. 2005]
NISP is not only a matter of e-Gov, but public CRIS play a central role, because government is the player in best position to establish official systems.
Why innovation funding data is bad and what can we do about it?
What are the lessons learned from Brazilian ST&I information projects?
How were Brazilian ST&I information systems developed?
2.2
2. What did we learn from Brazilian ST&I systems?
38
Leadership and commitment Integration
VISION/POLITICAL WILL
COMMON FRAMEWORKS/CO-OPERATION
Inter-agency collaboration Financing
CUSTOMER FOCUS
Access ChoiceCitizen
engagement
Privacy
RESPONSIBILITY
Accountabily Monitoring and Evaluation
2.2a International guidelines for e-Gov
OECD, 2003.
39
•Gather data to fulfill government needs
OR
•Promote Information Society
•Operational (transactional to support public processes)
OR
•Strategic to create national spaces of information
•Exclusively dedicated to the government needs
OR
•Systemic, designed to fulfill the needs of diverse ST&I players
•Operational (transactional to support public processes)
OR
•Strategic to create national spaces of information
•Dedicated to a particular government demand
OR
•Systemic, built to attend all ST&I players
•Isolated and connected only to sponsor agency information needs
OR
•Strategic to create national spaces of information
•Ordinary Software Engineering methods
OR
•e-government software methodology based on R&D and knowledge engineering
WORLD VIEW
SYSTEM MISSION
DATA REQUIREMENT
SYSTEM OWNERSHIP
SYSTEM LIFE
CYCLECONNECTIVITY
METHODOLOGY
2.2b The e-Gov principles of NISP based on the Lattes e-Gov methodology.
40
CONCLUSIONS
What can we conclude in terms of using innovation funding data in strategic
studies such as NR pathway analysis?
41
How to create better data?
1) Apply e-Gov methodology in CRIS projects2) Include strategic issues from the beginning3) Apply knowledge systems to deal with CRIS and
related data (ex. web documents)4) Involve experts in data analysis
Hence, if we want useful (rich, correct, easily updated) data to analyze ST&I, we need to:
IMPORTANT: (1) and (2) are applicable only in new (or renewed) information system projects, but (3) and (4) can be useful even when the data is unstructured, and available in nonofficial sources. The problem with applying (3) and (4) without (1) and (2) is the cost-benefit relation of such studies.
42
What can we do in our project?
Knowledge-based ST&I systems combined with experts´ analysis can help us to study innovation
data and check for evidences of new NR pathways…
Finally, we hope that we can say now:
MUITO OBRIGADO!
Roberto C. S. Pacheco; Vinícius Medina Kern; José Salm Jr; Denilson Sell.
Second WorkshopBuenos Aires, May 31, 2011
3rd Background Paper – Regional and international practices for disclosing information related to innovation and social environment impact of business. Project “OPENING UP NATURAL RESOURCE-BASED INDUSTRIES FOR INNOVATION: EXPLORING NEW PATHWAYS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA”