Top Banner
1 Stefan Spanier Search for New Physics with B-Mesons Search for New Physics with B-Mesons Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee
43

Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

Jan 14, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

1Stefan Spanier

Search for New Physicswith B-Mesons

Search for New Physicswith B-Mesons

Stefan SpanierUniversity of Tennessee

Page 2: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

2Stefan Spanier

DarkEnergy:~70% Dark

Matter:~25%

• Energy budget of Universe

Antimatter: 0% ~25%

~70%

Page 3: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

3Stefan Spanier

• Understanding the Small = Understanding the Big ?

In Big-Bang Cosmology Universeinitially contained equal amounts of matter, anti-matter and photons

Most particles & anti-particlesannihilated each other while the Universe was still very dense to form photons.

Today’s (visible) Universehas a lot of cosmic micro-wave photons and a tinybit of matter: One baryon per109 microwave photons.Only one anti-particle per109 particles.

Sometime a process distinguishing particles from anti-particles was at work…

T< 3K

matteranti-matterphotons

Page 4: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

4Stefan Spanier

• Baryogenesis

qq

q

q

q_

q_

q_

q_q_

q

B symmetric

B anti-symmetric

q q,l_Rate r

q,lq_

Rate r_

Condition I Condition II : r r CP Violation_

Condition III

freeze out

qq

q

q_

Non-equilibrium

_

Standard Model provides the ingredients !

Toy Model of Baryogenesis

3 fundamental conditions to construct a baryon asymmertyA. Sakharov

Disclaimer: There are many realizations, but all need CP violation.

Page 5: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

5Stefan Spanier

• Standard Model - CP SymmetryC : charge conjugation (particle – antiparticle)P : parity P x = -x , P( x v ) = ( x v )

For decay of particle X into final state f:

CP ( X f ) = X f

• A difference between decay rates of a particle and its Anti-particle impliesCP violation.

CP violation can be ingredient toexplain ratio of matter to anti-matter.

- C and P maximally violated in the Standard Model

- 1964 CP violation observed in neutral kaon decays !

_ _x

-x

Page 6: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

6Stefan Spanier

CP violation in the Standard Model is10 orders of magnitude too small !

It may havehappenedhere ! But …

1015 K Electroweak Era (100 GeV)1013 K Quark-Hadron transition

(1 GeV)

109 K Nucleosynthesislight elements created

20 K Galaxies form

3 K Today

1028 K Grand Unification Transition

10-10 s10-6 s

1 min

1 Byr

14 Byr

10-35 s

Something else has happened !B-factory can reach > 1016 K …~

SM Higgs is heavy (125 GeV [LHC]) no departure from thermal equilibrium

Page 7: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

7Stefan Spanier

u c t d s bd s b u c t

e- e e e+

• Standard Model of Particle Physics

C: Charge conjugation symmetry

In today’s accelerators (cosmic rays) particles and anti-particles are created and annihilate in pairs !

ud

u

p :_

__

_

C p = p_

_ _ _

_ _ _

_ _ _

Charge+ 2/3- 1/3

-1

0

Charge+ 1/3- 2/3

0

+1

Quarks

Leptons

mass

B=1/3

L=1

particles anti-particles

B=-1/3

anti-proton

L=-1

C

Standard Model

Baryon number

Lepton number

Page 8: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

8Stefan Spanier

• CP Violation in the Standard ModelWb c,u

()

(0,0) (1,0)

b uarg( )

d targ( )

CP magnitude ~ triangle area)

u c t

ds b

~1

- parametrize transitions with 3 strengths and one complex phase

the phase is accessiblewith B mesons !

/

DK, K… J/ K0 , K0, D*D* …

,

Branching Fractions < 10-4

b_

d

CKM matrix

Page 9: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

9Stefan Spanier

• CP Violation Phenomenology To observe CP-violation (phase) a particle decay needs to dependon at least two complex amplitudes A1 and A2

decay rate amplitude2

• Only one amplitude: |A1 |

2 = |a1ei1|2 = |a1|2

rate not sensitive to phase

• Two amplitudes: |A1 + A2|

2 = |a1 ei1 + a2 ei2|2

= a12 + a2

2 + 2 a1 a2 cos(1 – 2)

rate depends on phase

Quantum Mechanics 101

Page 10: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

10Stefan Spanier

• Relevant Amplitudes in B-Meson DecaysTree amplitude Penguin Amplitude

weak coupling ~Vcb Vcs * ~Vtb Vts

*

W

e.g. B0 J/ K0S e.g. B0 K0

S

W

b cc

s

d d

J/

K0S

_ _

_

_

gluon

b t

d

_

K0S

B0B0

ss

_

sd

_

_

d d

s

s Ks

η’

B0 g

g~b s

+(δ 23

dRR)b

~R

s~R

• Penguins allow for Physics Beyond the Standard Model !

• Different Penguins in different wayse.g. additional Phase from

Supersymmetry ?

b

d

b

dnew couplingStudy Penguins !!!

s

ds

ss

sd

s

_

__

K0S

Page 11: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

11Stefan Spanier

• Direct CP Violation

Short range, long range (rescattering) hadronic interactions need

to be understood ! New Physics can change the expected rates.

Rate difference:

)sin()sin(,

jijiji

jiaa2- RR

•CP violation Rate(B0 f ) Rate(B0 f )_ _

hadronictime

i : weak phases i : strong phases

ii iii eea iA

Page 12: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

12Stefan Spanier

From 454 million neutral B decays reconstruct 1606 signals.Challenge: distinguish K+- from +- and K+K- which are also present.

0

0

BB K

K

BABAR

AsymmetryNK-+

NK+-

NK+-NK-+

-+

= -0.133 0.030stat 0.009syst

_

Significant asymmetry (13%) is 100,000 stronger than the one measured in neutral kaon decays.

4.2

Bang on Standard Model expectation

[ Phys.Rev.Lett. 93 (2004) 131801]

• Direct CP Violation in B0K+- (B0K-+)

Page 13: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

13Stefan Spanier

• B0 B0 Oscillation Measurement

Amix(t) =unmix – mix unmix + mix

Bd0Bd

0_

Wb d

bd t-W

- -

t

B0, B0 can oscillate (mix) into each other one more amplitude_

Box amplitude:~ Vtb Vtd

*

Characteristic decay products tag the B0 flavor:

_

6.3 ps 12.6 ps

N(e+e-) – N(e-e-/e+e+)N(e+e-) + N(e-e-/e+e+)

=

md = 0.493 0.012stat 0.009sys ps-1

D

-cW+

e

e+

D-

D cos (md t) (t)

W -e

e-

c

Page 14: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

14Stefan Spanier

• CP Violation in Interference between Mixing and Decay Observe as an asymmetry between transitions of particle % anti-particle.The cleanest way is via a decay of B0 into a CP eigenstate:

B0

B0e+e-Y(4S)

B0_

_J/ K0

S / K0S

time

sin2 = 0 : no CP violationsin2 0.7 : expected in Standard Model for J/ K0

S and K0S

with 4% theoretical uncertainty in SM, only.

(golden modes)

flavor tag

Quantumentangled

mixing

contains CP phase)

Page 15: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

15Stefan Spanier

• CP Violation in Interference between Mixing and Decay Observe as an asymmetry between transitions of particle % anti-particle.The cleanest way is via a decay of B0 into a CP eigenstate:

B0

B0e+e-Y(4S)

B0_

_ K0S

time

flavor tag

Quantumentangled

mixing

+ direct CP violation

Page 16: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

16Stefan Spanier

Use Electron-Positron collider– Y(4S) resonance decays nearly 100% into B-meson pairs (B+B-,B0B0)– Accelerator can be tuned in; production just above threshold – Clean environment– Coherent B0B0 production b

be-e+

d

d

Y(4s)

L = 1

d ~ 30 m

mass(B) = 5.28 GeV/c2

uu,dd,ss ~ 2.1 nbcc ~ 1.3 nbbb ~ 1.05 nb

hadronse+

e-

[CLEO]

(energy)

OffOn

)MeV(ME )S4(CM

PEP-IIBABAR

_

_

-

• B Meson Production

Page 17: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

17Stefan Spanier

• Asymmetry Measurement with BaBar

B Decay Time (ps)

perfect time resolution

resolution function

LEP/CDF

B Factoriesperfect time resolution

B Decay Time Difference (ps)

e- : 9 GeV

e+ 3 GeV

BJ/

ee

KS

B

, e, K

z

Lorentz Boost =0.56z> = <t>c ~ 250 m

L

Flavor tagPartial reconstruction

Full reconstruction

.. instead of ~ 30 m in CM

Page 18: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

18Stefan Spanier

1650 mA e-

2500 mA e+

4 ns bunch spacing~ 8 BB pairs / s

BaBa

r in

tegr

al lu

min

osit

y fb

-1

Run1

Run2

Y(4s) - 40 MeV

Run3

Run4

Run5330 M BB pairs

2000 2006

Page 19: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

19Stefan Spanier

• BaBar Collaboration

• 10 countries• 63 institutions • ~550 physicists

Page 20: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

20Stefan Spanier

• BaBar Detector

e-

e+

1.5T Solenoid

Instrumented Flux Return19 layers of RPCsLimited Streamer tubes in upper/lower barrel sextant

Silicon Vertex Tracker5 layers of double sided Si strips

Electromagnetic Calorimeter6580 CsI(Tl) crystals

Drift Chamber40 axial stereo layers

DIRC144 synthetic fused silica bars11000 PMTs

Page 21: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

21Stefan Spanier

• The Cherenkov Detector B

, e, K

(~80%)

identify particle by measuring C , with momentum p is known from tracking:

Cher

enko

v an

gle

[rad

]

track momentum [GeV/c]

in quartz

cosC () = n() v/c

identify particle alsoby measuring thenumber of photons N

for certain d

Num

ber

of p

hoto

ns

track momentum [GeV/c]

N L sin2CL = pathlength in medium

Page 22: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

22Stefan Spanier

• The DIRC

water n3

water

4.9 m 1.17 m

35 mm x 17 mm

Pinhole focus

C

4 synthetic fused silica barsglued together

air n2

Typical DIRC photon: 400 nm, ~ 200 bounces, ~ 5 m path in quartz.

Page 23: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

23Stefan Spanier

• DIRC Parts

- 12 DIRC sectors- each has one aluminum box with

12 quartz bars kept in nitrogen atmosphere

Page 24: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

24Stefan Spanier

• DIRC Parts • 6000 liters pure, de-ionized water• 10,752 conventional photo tubes - immersed directly in water, - hexagonal light catchers- max quantum efficiency@410 nm

Page 25: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

25Stefan Spanier

In a typical multihadron event11 randomly distributed photonsand ~240 signal photons (8 tracks)

ttravel

z

• Reconstruction predict photon arrival time from geometry

(t) = 1.7 ns time resolution

± 8 ns window

3D

Page 26: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

26Stefan Spanier

Energy-substituted mass Energy difference Event shape

Main background from continuum events:Some standard discrimination variables:

2*2*BbeamES pEm **

beamB EEE

eventsBB

eventsqqee

csduqqqee ,,, ,

* = e+e CM frame

• Event Variables

Page 27: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

27Stefan Spanier

• The Golden Standard Model Mode

mES [GeV/c2 ]

signal region

J/ K0S + similar

Page 28: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

28Stefan Spanier

sin2β = 0.722 0.040 (stat) 0.023 (sys)

J/ψ KL (CP even) mode(cc) KS (CP = -1) modes

Standard Model Value with high precision.

• The Golden Standard Model Mode

Page 29: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

29Stefan Spanier

0 0LB K0 0

SB K K K

full backgroundcontinuum bkg

Golden Modes

CP = +1CP = -1

The KL reconstruction is a proof of principle for other charmless modes.Likelihood fit considering signal and background + calibration data …

• B0 K0 - The Penguin Mode

after signal prob. cut after signal prob. cut

Page 30: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

30Stefan Spanier

B0KS

B0KL

0tagB

0tagB

0tagB

0tagB

Largest systematic error due to K+K- S-wave: content determined with a moment analysis

• B0 K0 combined likelihood fit

after signal prob. cut

Page 31: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

31

KS00

K0

K+K-K0

’K0

sin2

Naïve average of sin2 is 8.3 from 0and discrepancy to SM is 2.8

• Measurements of CP in Penguins

Standard Model

sin2

Dire

ct C

P Vi

olat

ion

CP in Interference between Mixing & Decay

?

Page 32: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

Particle Production at LHC

Rate = L cross section, L = Luminosity, = Decay Probability

7 TeV

7 TeV

Soft Scattering Dominates

• Higgs Rate < 0.1 Hz• b-quark production ~108 higher background for any heavy

particle search

Page 33: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

• CP violation measured with high precision by the BaBar and Belle in the Bd system in mixing+decay no significant deviation from the Standard Model

• CP violation in mixing O(10-3) in the SM. In Bs system

Search for New Physics in Bs Decays

u,c,t

ubuscbcstbts VVVVVV *** Bs

Bd ubudcbcdtbtd VVVVVV ***

s

d~ 0.004 (SM)

u,c,t

cbcsVV *

cbcsVV *Motivation: indirect access to NP (New Physics) via CP

Page 34: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

34

StrategyWe measure CP-violation via the time dependent decay rate for untagged Bs angular analysis is required to split CP-even and CP-odd components of the decay amplitude

0→1 1 so L=0,1,2P=(-1)L → CP=±1 Transversity Basis

{cos,,cos}

Page 35: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

B Reconstruction – Vertex Detector

Secondary Vertex

Impact Parameter

-+ K+

K -

-

p pBs

B

B in jet

J

Page 36: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

The CMS Detector

TRACKER

MUONENDCAPS

Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC)  positionResistive Plate Chambers (RPC) time

Resistive PlateChambers (RPC) timing

Drift Tubes (DT) position

66M Silicon Pixels, 3layers (barrel), 2 forward disksSilicon Strips: 10 barrel layers, 3+9 disks

ECAL Scintillating PbWO4 Crystals

HCALPlastic scintillator&Brass

SOLENOIDB = 3.8 T

MUON BARREL

=1.2

2.4

Page 37: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee
Page 38: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

CKM Fitter

Page 39: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

Standard Model Physics – Rare DecaysBs

0μ+μ- and B0μ+μ-

strongly suppressed in the SM• forbidden at tree level• Cabibbo suppressed• helicity suppressed• require an internal quark annihilation

Decay BF SM

Bs0 → μ+μ− (3.7 ± 0.2) × 10−9

B0 → μ+μ− (1.1 ± 0.1) × 10−10

Buras arXiv:1009.1303. 

b

)(dsuct ,,

b

)(ds

W+

W-W+

Z0t

t0~

l~d~0~

h0,H0H+

New Physics sensitivity comparable to e, B

Non-Observation binds parameter space Complementary to direct searches at LHC

Page 40: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

Result

0B

0SB

Combined 2011/2012 data

4.390.1

9.00 100.3)(

SBBF

90 101.1)( BBFat 95% C.L.

Page 41: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee
Page 42: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee
Page 43: Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee

43Stefan Spanier

• B mesons are a laboratory to study indirectly new physics.

• CP violation is a necessary ingredient in a baryon-dominated Universe and required in any New Physics.

• BaBar was a very successful e+e- collider experiment

which observed significant CP asymmetries.

• The exploration continues with LHC.

• B mesons continue to be a very good tool to probe

physics beyond the Standard Model.

Conclusions