atus of Top-Down Models for the Origin Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays ervation of ultra-high energy cosmic rays before the Pierre Auger Observator puzzle: universe is opaque to UHECRs (Greisen 1966; Zatsepin & Kuzmin 1966) ong magnetic fields are needed (Hillas 1984) known how to defeat radiation losses during acceleration phase correlation with astronomical objects within 100 Mpc preliminary results for the UHECR spectrum from the Pierre Auger Observator indow to new particle physics and inflation? Top-down scenarios pzillium decay” (Hill 1983; Dubrovich, Fargion & Khlopov 2003) pzilla decay” (Berezinsky, Kachelriess & Vilenkin 1997; Kuzmin & Rubakov 199 pzilla annihilation” (Blasi, Dick & Kolb 2001; Dick, Hopp & Wunderle 2005) erheavy dark matter from inflation power of anisotropy! Rainer Dick, Physics & Engineering Physics
16
Embed
Status of Top-Down Models for the Origin of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays I. Observation of ultra-high energy cosmic rays before the Pierre Auger Observatory.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Status of Top-Down Models for the Origin of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays
I. Observation of ultra-high energy cosmic rays before the Pierre Auger Observatory
II. The puzzle: ● The universe is opaque to UHECRs (Greisen 1966; Zatsepin & Kuzmin 1966) ● Strong magnetic fields are needed (Hillas 1984) ● Not known how to defeat radiation losses during acceleration phase ● No correlation with astronomical objects within 100 Mpc
III. The preliminary results for the UHECR spectrum from the Pierre Auger Observatory
IV. A window to new particle physics and inflation? Top-down scenarios ● “Wimpzillium decay” (Hill 1983; Dubrovich, Fargion & Khlopov 2003) ● “Wimpzilla decay” (Berezinsky, Kachelriess & Vilenkin 1997; Kuzmin & Rubakov 1997) ● “Wimpzilla annihilation” (Blasi, Dick & Kolb 2001; Dick, Hopp & Wunderle 2005)
V. Superheavy dark matter from inflation
VI. The power of anisotropy!
Rainer Dick, Physics & Engineering Physics
The cosmic ray spectrum
compiled by Simon Swordy
Ultrahigh energy cosmic ray spectrafrom AGASA and HiRes
Image courtesyof AGASA
Image courtesy of HiRes
Arrival directions of ultrahigh energy cosmic raysobserved by AGASA
Image courtesy of AGASA
Top-down models:
● Direct conversion of rest mass energy into cosmic rays through decay or annihilation of superheavy dark matter no need for extremely powerful and efficient acceleration mechanism no correlation with local supernovae or AGNs
● No GZK cutoff length visible in the spectrum due to UHECR generation in our galactic halo
But
● Very different anisotropy signatures for Wimpzillium or Wimpzilla decay vs. Wimpzilla annihilation
:GeV if
densityenergy comoving the in mode growing a yields
(
inflation of end the towards
scalars coupledweakly for equation evolution The
14
2...
105.1
)exp)(,0),(),(3),(
Hm
HttatkmtkHtk
22
2
00
3
49exp
),(),(),(),()(21
mHt
tktkmtktkta
Superheavy particles can be generated during inflation:
GeV.GeV window mass SHDM
GeV. if s inflation of
end theat modes massive the of onpreservati implies
radiation)for dust,for inflationafter
modes massivefor solution asymptotic The
1412
12136
3/6222
0
/3/2
1
1010
1010
)(21
cos,/2)(,)(
43(
)(
m
tmt
atm
tmtttHtta
tm
3
22
12
12225
2
3
22
3
2
2333
10kpc)3.7(
1005.0smeV1012.9
8),(
1.0
8),(
8
)(),()(
core
Sun
haloclump
A
X
corecoreXhaloclump
A
corecorecoreX
E
AXX
dM
Mf
vM
dn
dEMEdN
EMf
vdVn
dEMEdN
E
rr
vrnrd
dEMEdN
EEjE
stars) (Wimpzilla resubstructumatter dark in
onannihilati lcollisiona fromflux Spectral
XX
Suncore
X
A
MMn
vvMv
GeV10m1089.7
,1,skm100
sm1040.44
12317
11343
2
densities core ont requiremen ensuing and boundunitarity
:onannihilati Wimpzilla lcollisiona on constraintPrimary
2005) (RD, data AGASA to
function ionfragmentatMLLA the withfit Spectral
2
3
33
1615),(
EEEE
dEEEdN
E in
in
in
Blue: fragmentationof two initial jetsyields
26.005.3)
log(Xin ME
Red: direct fragmentationyields
28.095.2)
2
log(Xin ME
The Pierre Auger Observatory(Courtesy P. Mantsch, astro-ph/0604114)
Surface Array1600 detector stations1.5 km spacing3000 km2
Fluorescence Detectors4 Telescope enclosures6 Telescopes per
enclosure24 Telescopes total
Our first result using preliminary data published by the Pierre Auger Collaboration (RD & K.M. Hopp, 2006)
9.0
0.2
9.0
0.22
12
2
8.4|
9.3|
10)1.16.1(|2|
direct
jet
directXjetX MM
)log(
)log(
GeV
Spectrum from the Pierre Auger Observatory, 2007T. Yamamoto, Pierre Auger Collaboration, 0707.2638
W105.4sGeV108.2sUHECR108.2
AU1
10
18128117
5
L
r
mm
Luminosity
radius
mass
0.1
density
:stars" Wimpzilla"for valuesTypical
Sun
Sun
The power of anisotropy (if absence of GZK cutoff is confirmed)
The Pierre Auger observatory will tell the good from the bad:
● Correlation with local AGNs: Standard (or non-standard?) bottom-up acceleration.
● No correlation in event distribution with AGNs but with local superstructures: Local gamma ray bursts or bottom-up with strong intergalactic magnetic fields.
● Isotropic distribution without visible correlation with local structure: Z-bursts. ● Uniform increase in event distribution towards galactic center: Wimpzilla or Wimpzillium decay.
● About 1000 pointlike sources with increasing density towards galactic center: Wimpzilla annihilation.
Conclusions
● If there is no GZK cutoff in the spectrum, the anisotropy pattern observed by the Pierre Auger observatory will decide between local gamma ray bursts, Z-bursts, Wimpzilla (or Wimpzillium) decay, and Wimpzilla annihilation.
● Wimpzilla annihilation would appear in dense core regions of dark matter substructure (“Wimpzilla stars”).
● Wimpzilla annihilation still predicts a cutoff between 1012 GeV and 1013 GeV because the unitarity bound indicates that the flux from annihilation of more massive superheavy dark matter particles is negligible.