Status of KLOE and DAFNE - roma1.infn.itbini/etamesonnet.pdf · W (MeV) pφ (MeV) xV (cm) zV (cm) Run Number These variables are used in the data reconstruction procedure and to provide

EtaMesonNet Meeting 14/10/2004

Status of KLOE and DAFNE

Cesare Bini (Universita’ “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma)

For the KLOE collaboration

1. Overview of physics at a φ - factory2. The collider DAFNE3. The KLOE experiment4. Overview of KLOE results

|Vus| from KL decaysHadronic corrections to g-2

5. Conclusions and Outlook

1. Overview of Physics at a φ - factoryDAFNE: e+e- collider at center of mass energy W=1020 MeV

at Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INFN

W=1020 MeV φ meson peakσ(e+e- φ all) ~ 3 µb

W scan around the φ peak ( φ KSKL )

Why at the φ peak ? Because it is “a source of interesting physics”BRs of φ decay channels (from PDG)

1) Kaon pairs:K+K− = 49.1% K0K0 = 34.0%

2) 3 pions π+π−π0 = 15.4% (including ρπ)

3) Radiative decaysηγ = 1.3%π0γ = 1.2 × 10-3

η’γ = 6.2 × 10-5

ππγ = ~10-4 (including f0(980) γ)ηπ0γ = ~10-4 (including a0(980) γ)

4) Conversion decaysηe+e- = 1.1 × 10-4

π0e+e- = 1.1 × 10-5

Kaon physics:monochromatic ( p = 110 MeV/c ) kaons (charged and neutrals);“coherent” production mutual “tagging”Neutral kaons are produced in a pure quantum JPC = 1−− state:λS = 6 mm λL = 3.5 m

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]pKpKpKpKN

pKpKpKpKi

SLLSrrrr

rrrr

−−−=

−−−=

2

21 0000

Pure KS and KL beams KS , KL physicsKaon interferometryHigh statistics of K± ; K± decays and asymmetries

3 pionsφ ρπ samples of ρ+, ρ- and ρ0 CPT and Isospin testsStudy of direct φ π+π−π0 coupling

Radiative decays (1):

Since φ = <ss> state (almost pure)φ Mγ is related to the s-content of M

Nature of scalar mesons ( f0(980), a0(980), σ )Pseudoscalar mixing angle ( comparison of φ ηγ and φ η’γ )

Radiative decays (2):

Source of monochromatic pseudoscalar mesons;φ ηγ : E=363 MeV photon + η decay σ = 30 nbφ π0γ : E=501 MeV photon + π0 decay σ = 3 nbφ η’γ : E= 60 MeV photon + η’ decay σ = 0.2 nb

η and η’ physics

Radiative Return:Machine @ W=1020 MeV

σ(e+e- hadrons) 2Mπ < Q < W

)()()( 2

2

2 QHeedQ

eedQ −+−+

−+−+

→=→ ππσγππσ

H(Q2) is the “radiator” function fully provided by Montecarlobased on QED (Eva, Phokhara,… big effort from theoreticians)

σ(e+e- hadrons) [2Mπ < Q < Mφ] 67% of error on aµ(hadr)“Fundamental ingredient for precision test of the Standard Model”

2. The collider DAΦNE

2 separate beams 2 interaction regions

(cannot run simultaneously)120 bunches / beamBunch dimensions @ I.R.:

~ 20 µm × 2 mm × 1 cmBunch spacing = 2.7 nsContinuous alternate injection

(topping up) every 20-30 minsProject luminosity = 5 ×1032 cm-2 s-1

50 m

DAΦNE “history”:

Spring 1999 First collisions: KLOE test run2000 KLOE Run Lint = 20 pb-1

2001 KLOE Run Lint = 200 pb-1

2002 KLOE Run Lint = 250 pb-1

2002 DEAR Run Lint = 110 pb-1

2003-2004 FINUDA Run Lint = 250 pb-1

2004 KLOE Run Lint = 420 pb-1 (up to date)

Luminosity progress

1 standard day of DAFNE/KLOE operation (4/10/2004)

Blue = e- curr.Red = e+ curr.

InstantaneousLuminosity

Integrated Luminosity( 6 pb-1 /day )

L = 1032 cm-2 s-1 ~ 300 φ /s 2.5 ×105 η / day , 1500 η’ / day

3. The KLOE experiment

Iron Yoke

SC Coil5.188 kG

The KLOE detector

Interaction region:Instrument quadrupoles,Al-Be spherical beam pipe

Large volume Drift Chamber(13K cells, He gas mixt.)

Pb-SciFi Calorimeter( barrel + endcap,15 X0 depth, 98%solid angle coverage)

0.52 Τ magneticfield

The KLOE Calorimeter

1.2 mm

Lead

1.35 mm1.0 mm

Pb-Sci.Fi. StructureLight guides + PMT read-outEnergy, Time and impact position

measurements.

)(%7.5)(

GeVEEE

=σ

psGeVEpst 140

)(54)( ⊕=σ

The KLOE Drift Chamber“Light” mechanical structure (carbon fiber) < 0.1 X0Gas Mixture = 90% He – 10% Isobut. / All stereo wires zHit position measured with σ( r ) ~ 200 µm and σ( z ) ~ 2 mm

σ(p)/p ~ 0.3-0.4%

p(MeV/c) resolution for 510 MeV/celectrons and positrons

Polar angle

M(MeV/c2) resolution for Ks π+π-

σ(M) ~ 1 MeV/c2

M(π+π-) (MeV/c2)

KLOE Data Taking1.Continuous data taking: no stop at beam injection;2.Trigger: ≥ 2 energy clusters above threshold (50 – 150 MeV)

OR > NNN hits in the drift chamberTrigger Rate (kHz) = 1 (physics) + 0.9 (Cosmic rays) + 0.45 (Bckg) = 2.3 kHz

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

3.On-line calorimeter calibration: (every 200 nb-1 ~ 1 h)Energy (absolute scale from e+e- γγ)Time (absolute scale using DAFNE RF signal (2.715 ns))

Time (2002 d.t.)

Rel. energyVariations (%)

EndcapsBarrel

4.Drift Chamber t0s and space-to-time relations calibration:Iterative procedure based on cosmic ray runs;On-line check of residuals using Bhabha and cosmic rays

s-t relations residuals vs drift distance

On-line check of residualswith selected Bhabha events

5. Data quality controlOn-line reconstruction evaluation of relevant quantities run by run:

W (MeV) pφ (MeV)

xV (cm) zV (cm)

Run Number

These variables are used in the data reconstructionprocedure and to provide information to the DAFNE team.

W=√s center of mass energy

pφ φ momentum (lab. boost)

xV , yV, zV interaction point coordinates

6. Data reconstruction:End of run: if (calibration_ok) start Data reconstruction

Calorimeter clustersTracking in Drift Chamber

Background rejection (cosmic rays, machine bkg.)Event classification

Big computing effort;~ 120 CPU used ~ 300 TB tapes (including raw data, DST files and MC events)

4. Overview of KLOE results

KS→ πeνPhys. Lett. B535 37 (2002)Preliminary update presented at ICHEP ‘04

KS → π+π−(γ)KS → π0π0

Phys. Lett. B538 21 (2002)Update with ’01-’02 data in progress

KL → γγ/KL →3π0 Phys. Lett. B566 61 (2003)K+ → π+π0π0 Phys. Lett. B597 2 (2004)

K0 mass KLOE Note 181 (http://www.lnf.infn.it/kloe)Upper limit BR(KS →π0π0π0) Paper in preparation

KL→πµν,πeν,π+π-π0,3π0 Preliminary results presented at ICHEP ‘04Vus from KL and KS Preliminary results presented at ICHEP ’04KL mean life Preliminary results presented at ICHEP ‘04

Vus from K± In progress

CP violation & interference In progress

(1) Kaon physics

φ → π0π0γPhys. Lett. B537 21 (2002) Updates in progress

Upper limit BR(η →3γ) Phys. Lett. B591 45 (2004)

φ leptonic width Paper in preparation

BR(η → π0γγ) Preliminary results presented at ICHEP ‘04

Search for f0(980) π+π− Preliminary results presented at ICHEP ‘04Hadronic cross section(down to 2Mπ

2=0.08 GeV2) In progress

Hadronic cross section(0.35 < s < 0.95 GeV2) Paper submitted to Phys. Lett. B

Upper limit BR(η → π+π-) Paper in preparation

φ → ηπ0γPhys. Lett. B536 209 (2002) Updates in progress

φ→ η’ γ, ηγ (mixing angle)

Phys. Lett. B541 45 (2002) Updates in progress

φ → ρπ, π+π-π0 Phys. Lett. B561 55 (2003)

Dalitz plot η → 3π Preliminary results presented at ICHEP ‘04

(2) Other results (radiative decays…)

KLOE contributions to 2 frontier problems in high energy physics:(1) Unitarity of the CKM matrix through Vus precision measurement(2) Hadronic corrections to the muon anomaly aµ

|Vud | is extracted from nuclear β decay (Czarnecki-Marciano-Sirlin hep-ph/0406324)

|Vus | is extracted from partial widths of kaon semileptonic decays Γ(K πlν(γ));

(1) Unitarity Test: Vus

At present the most precise test of unitarity of CKM matrix comes from 1st

row:|V|Vudud||22 + |+ |VVusus||22 + |V+ |Vubub||22 ~~ |V|Vudud||22 + |+ |VVusus||22 ≡≡ 1 1 –– ∆∆

∆∆ = 0.0042 = 0.0042 ±± 0.0019 ( PDG02 )0.0019 ( PDG02 )

Γ(K → πlν(γ)) ∝ |Vus f+Kπ(0) |2 SewIi(λ+,λ0,0)) (1 + δi

em+∆Ii/2)

f+Kπ(0) form factor at 0 momentum transfer: pure theory calculation (χPT, lattice)

I(λ +, λ0 ,0) phase space integral, Sew short distance corrections (1.0232)

λ+,λ0 slopes (momentum dependence of the vector and scalar form factors)

διem+ ∆Ii/2 long distance radiative corrections for form factor and phase space

KLOE measures all kaon semileptonics decays with “tagged kaon beams”KS π±eν , π±µνKL π±eν , π±µνK± π0eν , π0µν

KL semileptonic decays (preliminary results ICHEP 04)

N0 tagged KL λL = 3.4 m δNi i=1,4 (4 main KL decays in δT)εi = efficiency to detect channel iProb(δT,τ) = prob. to decay in δT

BRi = δNi / ( N0 εi Prob(δT,τ) )

(1) τ from fit of time distribution(2) Impose ΣiBRi = 1 - ε further

equation determination ofτ and single BRi

Results:

BR(KL→ πeν) = 0.3985 ± 0.0006 ± 0.0035

BR(KL→ πµν) = 0.2702 ± 0.0005 ± 0.0025

BR(KL→ 3π0) = 0.2010 ± 0.0003 ± 0.0022

BR(KL→ π+π−π0) = 0.1268 ± 0.0004 ± 0.0010

τ = (51.15 ± 0.20 ± 0.40) ns (meth.(1))τ= (51.35 ± 0.05 ± 0.26) ns (meth.(2))

Consistency check of the method

KL → πµν sampleKL → πeν sample

Pmiss − Emiss in πe or eπ hyp. (MeV) Pmiss − Emiss in πµ or µπ hyp. (MeV)

1. K0l3 partial decay widths measured by KLOE Γ(e3,µ3)= BR(e3,µ3) / τ

2. f+Kπ(0) from Leutwyler-Roos 0.961(8) confirmed by Becirevic et al. (lattice+CHPT)

0.961(9)

3. quadratic parametrization of form factors (+ slopes from kTeV measurements)

|Vus| = 0.2248 ± 0.0015(exp.) ± 0.0020(the.) preliminary

Comparison with Unitarity:|Vus| f+

K(0)New results indicate no deviationsfrom CKM unitarity

(2) Hadronic corrections to g-2

Precision test of the Standard Model:

aµexp vs. aµ

th = aµQED + aµ

weak + aµhad

aµQED = (11 658 470.35 ± 0.28) ×10-10

aµweak = ( 15.4 ± 0.2 ) ×10-10

Aµhad = ( 693 ± 7 ) ×10-10

Im[ ] ∝ | hadrons |2aµhad,LO =

∫∞

→−+=243

, )()(4

1π

σπµ m hadree

lohad dssKsa K(s) ~ 1/s (kernel function)

The e+e-→π+π- channel accounts for ~72% of the contribution

both to aµhad and to σ2(aµ

had)

Radiative Return Method: select π+π−γ events with θγ < 15o

Enhancement of ISR vs. FSREffective threshold in Sπ

1 550 000 events / 141 pb-1

sπ (GeV2)

num

ber

of e

vent

s (x

103 )

Our cuts select events with

√sπ >550 MeV

H(Q2)

Integral… aµhad

(375.6 ± 0.8stat ± 4.8syst+theo) 10-10

CMD-2 (378.6 ± 2.7stat ± 2.3syst+theo) 10-10KLOE 1.3% Error

0.9% Error

aµ-11 659 000 (10-10) 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230

EJ95 (e+e-)

DH98 (e+e-+τ+QCD)

DEHZ02 (e+e- based)

HMNT02 (e+e- based)

DEHZ03 (e+e- based)

DEHZ03 (τ based)

BNL-E821 02 µ+

BNL-E821 04 µ-

BNL-E821 04 ave.

186.8±15.7

176.8±7.2

169.3±7.8

166.9±7.4

180.9±8.0

195.6±6.8

203±8

214±8.5

208±6

BN

L-E

821 04KLOE(hep-ex/0407048)Submittedto Phys. Lett. B

KLOE confirms a deviation of 2.7σ (according to an updated analysis of DHEZ)btw. theory and experiment for (g-2)µ!

KLOE data are relevant because they confirm e+e- - τ datadiscrepancy

gµ - 2: e+e- Data vs τ Data

KLOE agrees with CMD-2: τ data disagrees with e+e-

5. Conclusions and outlook

KLOE operation @ 4th period of data taking.Several results reached: among the latest

Vus determinationhadronic corrections to g-2

DAFNE program: KLOE run until L(int) = 2 fb-1

with present luminosity it means ~ 10 months datataking (realistic estimate)6 ×109 φ decays8 ×107 η decays4 ×105 η’ decays