The Snøhvit project: Technology Development Tim Dodson, Senior vice president - Technology Arena
The Snøhvit project: Technology Development
Tim Dodson, Senior vice president - Technology Arena
-
Time1985
Statpipe
1986
Gullfaks
1993
Sleipner
1994
Statfjord satellites
1997
Norne
2001
Glitne
1996
Troll
1999
Åsgard
Platform based
Subsea & floating
Significantstep changes
Snøhvit
2006
Subsea to land
Technology development in StatoilA 20-year history of successful technology implementation
New technology
Technology – the key to future successIncreased focus on meeting central business challenges
Exploration and reservoir management
Well construction
Subsea field development
Environmental technologies
Gas chain management
Tail production
Sub sea IOR
Develop assets
Find HC
New business options
Cost effective, safe and regular operation
Development costs more than halved through technology achievements
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Draugen
Statfjo
rdB
Gullfaks
AStat
fjord
C
Njord
Norne
Kristin
1970 - 1980
2000
2005 . . .
Åsgard
A
Åsgard
B
Snøhvit
Kviteb
jørn
Required CAPEX for 100,000 bbl daily production capacity (NOK bn)
Snøhvit development historyFirst development plan in 1982 ……..
• Based on Frigg field experience:
– Three platforms offshore
– Gas terminal and LNG plant onshore
• 1800 people onshore,1500 offshore during operation vs. current plan: 170 people on Melkøya
• CAPEX estimated to NOK 43 bn (corresponds to 100 bn in 2004 NOK)
…….. substantial CAPEX reduction essential
Snøhvit technologySubstantial R&D and innovation needed
• Four major technology elements:
– Remote controlled subsea systems
– Long distance multiphase flow
– Cost-effective LNG process technology
– Minimize emissions
• Dedicated R&D efforts over 15-25
years have resulted in:
– Significant CAPEX reduction
– State-of-the-art technologies
– International recognition
Remote controlled subsea systemsZero surface solutions – from subsea to the beach
Snøhvit 8 wells + 1 CO2 injectorAlbatross 4 wells, Askeladd 8 wells
Onshore processing and control centre
Multiphase flow lineCO2 pipelineMEG service line Fibre optic cable
Long distance multiphase flowNew world record
Statoil operated
In operationConstruction/planned
Transfer length (km)
Liqu
id R
atio
(bbl
/ M
MSC
FD)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 50 100 150 200
Malampaya
MikkelEast Spar
Goldeneye
KuduMensa
Popeye
North Alexandra
Western HubEM
TrollTOGI
Midgard
West deltaCorrib
Current operational limit
Snøhvit
Cost-effective LNG process technologyInnovative and proprietary
60m
”Cold box”
• Key technologies:
– Cost-efficient design and manufacturing of “Spiral Wound Heat Exchanger”
– High-efficiency and flexible “MFC®” LNG process design
• Statoil-Linde LNG Technology Alliance:
– Joint ownership of LNG process and heat exchanger technology
Spiral Wound LNG Heat Exchangers (SWHE)1000 km aluminium tubes – 40000m2 cooling area
• Qualified Linde as supplier of Spiral Wound Heat Exchangers for LNG plants
• Established Linde as competitor to the only previous SWHE supplier
• Several Linde SWHEs purchased by Shell, the world's largest listed supplier of LNG:
– New LNG train on existing north Australian plant
– Replaced old SWHEs in Brunei– Sakhalin LNG project
MFC®(Mixed Fluid Cascade) liquefaction processConverting gas to liquid by cooling to –163oC
GG
NG
LNG
M
M
M
NGL
• Cascade principle with 3 independent cooling circuits with mixed refrigerant in all 3 circuits
• High-efficiency process, with minimal emissions and energy use
• Cost competitive
• More flexibility than any other LNG process
10oC
-163oC
SWHE
-50oC
LNG process technology selection
• Potential conflict of interest for Statoil as operator and ”technology developer”
– LNG process supplier selected by Snøhvit Partners in 2000
• Two alternatives:– APCI propane-precooled mixed refrigerant (C3MR)
– Linde-Statoil mixed fluid cascade (MFC)
• MFC chosen based on technical and commercial criteria such as:– Process adaptability to low cooling water temperature– Ability to produce “lean” LNG for the US market– Robustness of critical components (compressors, heat exchangers)– Experience: C3MR previously unrivalled but MFC based on well-proven cascade
principle. Verification of the spiral wound heat exchangers in Mossel Bay followed by Shell approval of the same heat exchangers provided valuable support for the Snøhvit Partners’ decision
Snøhvit environmental technologiesMinimise emissions through CO2 reinjectionand high-efficiency process
Feedgasinlet
CO2 separationCO2 togeologicalstorage
High-efficiencypower generation
High-efficiencyliquefactionprocess
Snøhvit – technology for the ArcticA benchmark project for offshore and LNG technology
Full subsea field/remote operation Path breaking LNG technology
Record-distance multiphase flow CO2 sequestration and storage
Zero surface solutions – from subsea to the beach
Snøhvit – technology for the ArcticPaving the way for future developments in the Barents Sea
Considerable proven and undiscovered gas resourcesRemote area lacking infrastructureHypersensitive with regard to marine ecosystems and rich fishing grounds
Zero tolerance policy towards environmental harm
Future developments:Extreme-distance multiphase flowIncrease LNG train capacity to 8-9 mtpaSafe and compact plant design
150 km300 km
450 km