Statewide Pedestrian/Bicycle Data Collection Study Transportation Statistics Statewide Workshop – 2016 Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION August 31, 2016 Martin Guttenplan, AICP - CDM Smith 1
Statewide Pedestrian/BicycleData Collection Study
Transportation StatisticsStatewide Workshop – 2016
Florida Department of
TRANSPORTATION
August 31, 2016
Martin Guttenplan, AICP - CDM Smith
1
Florida Department of Transportation
Non-Motorized Transportation Count Data Collection
Who is involved?
• The Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) Statistics Office, Safety Office, Systems Planning Office, Office of Policy Planning, District Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Champions, District Pedestrian/Bicycle Coordinators, CDM Smith, and Marlin Engineering
What is the purpose?
• To better understand the performance of the non-motorized transportation system in Florida. o Develop a statewide standardized methodology for
counting non-motorized transportation users.
Who is this for?
• Florida Governmental agencies, MPOs, counties, cities and stakeholders who wish to better understand the use of the bicycle and pedestrian network
Task Activities Status
• Task Activities Status
– Literature Review
– Inventory of Count Programs
– Taxonomy
– Survey Monkey
– Draft Recommendations
– Pilot
– Final Report
Florida Department of Transportation 3
Florida Department of Transportation
Non-Motorized Transportation Count Data Collection
• FDOT statewide ped/bike count program
• Technology
• Locations
• Count frequency
• Partners
• Factoring short term counts to average annualized counts
• Coordination with crash data
• Coordination with FAST Act & FDOT performance measures
Research ProductsRecommendations for:
Meetings with Internal Stakeholders
• Twelve meetings have been held since February
• Most focused on data needs and use, data collection technologies, and stakeholder outreach
• Need for standardization and central storage
• There are MANY stakeholders interested in the data collected
Florida Department of Transportation 5
Internal Meetings - Takeaways
• Incorporate before/after counts for complete streets implementation
• Prioritize data collection locations
– High-volume areas
– Severe crash locations
• Integrate bike/ped counts with regular traffic monitoring
• Ped/Bike usage on freight connectors
Florida Department of Transportation 6
– Can affect chosen designs
of upgrades
Internal Meeting Takeaways
• Return On Investment study for complete street projects
– Value of traveler’s time
– Travel time saved
– Safety in terms of lives saved in $$
– Air quality
• Needs denominator:
Florida Department of Transportation 7
– Bike Ped Counts
Task Activities Status
• Technology/Location
recommendations such as:
– Infrared for peds
– Tubes for bikes
– Video for exposure
– Pavement loops for
continuous counting
Florida Department of Transportation 8
Survey Report Findings
Florida Department of Transportation 9
Who is counting non-motorized data?
- Approximately 20 entities
• City of Punta Gorda, Urban Design
• City of Lakeland Traffic Operations
• Sarasota County -Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
• Orange County Traffic Engineering
• Indian River County MPO
• City of Orlando
• Hillsborough MPO• City Of Punta Gorda,
Urban Design• USF CUTR / Walkwise
Tampa• Palm Beach MPO• MetroPlan Orlando• Embry-Riddle
Aeronautical University
• Miami-Dade MPO• City of Sanibel• Pinellas County MPO
• City of Jacksonville• River to Sea TPO• City of Orlando• Rails to Trails of the
Withlacoochee• Tallahassee-Leon
County Planning Department
• FDOT District 5• FDOT District 3• FDOT District 4• FDOT District 7
Survey Report Findings
Florida Department of Transportation 10
What would they use the data for?
• To prioritize projects
• To justify district project approval
• Get the information to their MPO
• To target and prioritize maintenance project locations
• Monitor trends
• Track before/after project implementation
• Bridge the gaps in bike-pedestrian routes
• Funding and investment needs
External Stakeholder Takeaways
Florida Department of Transportation
April 27th Workshop• There are various types of counters being used (passive
infrared and video imaging)
• More meaningful conclusions could be drawn from ongoing projects with good non-motorized count data
12
• Notify appropriate agencies’ staff of count locations
• Would it be possible to add a counting element to new SUN Trail projects?
External Stakeholder Takeaways
Florida Department of Transportation
May 26th Webinar
• Can Bike/Ped data collection be added to FDOT scoping process?
• Is there a focus on particular trip types for this study?
• Data should be: Publically accessible, GIS referenced & FDOT / Local Roadway ID Referenced
• Is there non-motorized travel demand modeling taking place?
13
Test Bed
Florida Department of Transportation 14
• This site in Tallahassee is testing the ability to count motorized and non-motorized traffic simultaneously.
• Uses piezo-electric to detect bicycles and infrared for pedestrians along the pathway.
• Data can be sent wirelessly.
• Study is still ongoing.
NATMEC
Florida Department of Transportation 15
• Ideas:
– MPO Regional Mobile Counter Loan Program
– Partner with public health agencies for
funding
– New Video Imaging Software
– Pedestrian counts from intersection push
buttons
NATMEC
Florida Department of Transportation 16
• Count Program Structures:
– A mixture of permanent counters and short
term counters.
– Permanent counter establishes expansion
and adjustment factors.
– Short term counters allow for data collection
in more areas.
North Texas Region
National Coordination
Florida Department of Transportation 17
• Opportunity to work with FHWA and use
their newly revised non-motorized TMG
data format in October
• Interest expressed from other researchers
and agencies about this study
• NATMEC conference in Miami
• TRB Non-motorized Data Subcommittee
Some Florida Best Practices
Florida Department of Transportation 18
• Ideas:
– D-5/MetroPlan Regional Mobile Counts
Program
– D-5 TransPed
– JAX - Video Imaging Software
Lessons Learned
Florida Department of Transportation 20
• Ideas:
– Don’t go live with counters until they are fully installed
– Use trained professionals familiar with technology for installation
– Use trained professionals to count from video• Easy to undercount
– Occlusion a problem with side-fire infrared
– Infrared units did not operate properly in Florida heat at first
Pilot Location to Apply Recommendations
Florida Department of Transportation
• Needs identified for testing:
– Various locations are needed
– Multiple area/land use types and facility types if possible
• Multiple organizations have put forward support for pilot study locations:
– Palm Beach MPO
– D4
– Miami Dade MPO
– D5
21
Pilot Location
Florida Department of Transportation
• Southeast Florida Chosen
• Marlin staff have local
knowledge and contacts
– Palm Beach MPO
– D4
– Miami Dade MPO
– D6
22
Matrix for Count Sites - FDOT Context Zones
Florida Department of Transportation
• FDOT Context Zones for Complete Streets Implementation
– Transect, ITE, PENNDOT, NJDOT based
23
Source: NJDOT & PENNDOT Smart Transportation Guidebook
Matrix for Count Sites
Florida Department of Transportation
• Location Chart example
24
A B C D E F G
Context ZonesSidewalk/ No Bicycle
Lane
Sidewalk/ Bicycle
Lane
Paved Shoulder
Shared Lane /
"Sharrow"
Sidewalk/ Protected Bike Lane
Shared Use Path
Trail
1Rural 1
2Rural Town 1 1 1
3Suburban Residential 2 2 1 1
4Suburban Commercial 2 2 1 1
5General Urban Residential 1 1 2 1
6Urban Center 1 2 1
7Urban Core 3 2 1 1
8State Park 1
Pilot Deployment
Florida Department of Transportation
• Initial matrix example of test sites by:
– Context Zone,
– Facility type and
– Local data collection efforts
25
Roadway Location Jurisdiction
On, Off-
System Subject
Existing Count
Location Devices Locations
1C US 27 North of I-75 Broward Co. SIS Bicycles tubes 2 2
2A Hillsboro Blvd S of NW 64th Tr Parkland SHS Pedestrians
and Bicycles
tubes/infra
red
2 4
2B Holmeberg Road E of Parskside Drive Parkland Local Pedestrians
and Bicycles
tubes/infra
red
2 4
2C SR 80 W of SR 15 Belle gLade SIS Bicycles tubes 2 2
3A Sunrise Blvd W of Pine Island Rd Sunrise SHS Pedestrians
and Bicycles
tubes/infra
red
2 4
3A Pine Island Rd N of Broward Blvd Plantation Local Pedestrians
and Bicycles
tubes/infra
red
2 4
3B University Dr N of Cleary Rd Plantation SHS Pedestrians
and Bicycles
tubes/infra
red
2 4
3B Pines Blvd W of 160th St Pembroke Pines SHS Pedestrians
and Bicycles
tubes/infra
red
2 4
3C SR 84 W of Markham Park Weston SHS Bikes tubes 2 2
Context
Scenario
# of
Devices
Pilot Deployment - Technology
Florida Department of Transportation
• Initial matrix of test sites
emphasized passive
infrared and mini-tubes
• Discussions with
manufacturers for
equipment loans
– Piezo
– Radar
– Video w/shape recognition
26
Pilot Deployment – Data Roll Up
Florida Department of Transportation
• Mix of local data and project data
• Mix of automated and manual counts
• Mix of time periods of counts
• Limited number of permanent counters to
develop factors
• Quality assurance of data
• FHWA TMAS compatibility
27
Discussion
Florida Department of Transportation
Pilot Deployment – Integration w/ FDOT TTMS or PTMS?
• Has it been done before?
• Other than RoadSys, is it possible?
28
Discussion
Florida Department of Transportation
Pilot Deployment – Integration with Strava Metro?
• How to best structure pilot data?
• Data format issues?
29
Discussion
Florida Department of Transportation
Future vision for non-motorized count program?
• How to expand?
• District 5 TransPed application
• Integration with existing & future count
stations?
• Impact of “Smart Cities”
30
Next Steps
Florida Department of Transportation 31
• Refinement of draft
recommendations
• Conduct pilot
• Refine recommendations
• Final report Dec. 30, 2016
Contact Information
James Whitley
Martin Guttenplan
Florida Department of Transportation 32