Top Banner
Tough Times Enable Resource Transformation: State Role in Districts’ Doing More with Less GEPA Institute, Miami, Florida April 26, 2010
19

States and School District Reform

Jun 19, 2015

Download

Education

ERS articulates for states what we know about district resource use and how states' policies can best help district efforts. ERS Director Don Hovey’s gave this presentation in Miami at the Governors’ Education Policy Advisors (GEPA) Institute for the National Governor’s Association on April 26. The presentation focused on helping states to understand our perspective on strategic resource use, the district transformational strategies and the top ten ways that states can support and enable strategic resource transformation.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: States and School District Reform

Tough Times Enable Resource Transformation:

State Role in Districts’ Doing More with Less

GEPA Institute, Miami, Florida

April 26, 2010

Page 2: States and School District Reform

• ERS is a non-profit consulting firm,

head-quartered in Boston

• We work with leaders of public school

systems to rethink the use of district and

school-level resources

• We analyze district spending, human

resources, school organization and

performance data to generate insight

around resource strategies

• We leverage this insight to design new ways to allocate and organize

resources at the district and school level

• Our work is grounded in over a decade of experience, working with

school districts across the country

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 2

Education Resource Strategies

Fundamental Message: It’s not just how much, it’s how well

Page 3: States and School District Reform

• Real spending doubled from $3,800 to $8,700 per pupil

• 80% of increase went toward adding staff positions and

increasing benefits while educator salaries remained flat in real

dollars*

• Spending on special education programs has gone from 4 to 21%

of district budgets while regular education spending has dropped from 80% to 55%**

Despite increased spending achievement gaps persist

* Parthenon group analysis, 2008

**Richard Rothstein, Where has the money gone? 2009

From 1970 to 2005 :

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC.

Page 4: States and School District Reform

Source: Digest of Education Statistics 2007: Tables 61, 64, and 66

Overall class sizes have decreased, but basic structure of schooling has remained the same

4EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC.

Page 5: States and School District Reform

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Growth in Per Pupil Expenditure (1970 to 2005)

Increase in number of

Non-Teachers

(excl. SPED)

Increase in Number of

Teachers (excl. SPED)

Increase in SPED staff

All other non-staff

Increase in Benefits Rate

New spending has increased the number of staff, but not the quality

Source: The Parthenon Group, 2007 from NCES; Educational Research Service; Parthenon Analysis

5EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC.

Page 6: States and School District Reform

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 6

Despite federal stimulus funding, trends in revenue and spending continue…

• Teaching salaries growing

at ~3-5% annually

• Benefits growing

at ~10+% annually

• SPED staff/student continues to

grow

• Tax revenue falling

• Enrollment declining

• State stabilization funds are

filling the revenue gap

(but only temporarily)

Page 7: States and School District Reform

• Across the board spending cuts

• Cut “non-classroom” spending

­ Teacher professional development

­ Collaborative planning time

­ Coaches

• Layoff junior teachers without regard

to teacher results or contribution

In tough times, districts usually hunker down…

7EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC.

Less support for teachers Less support for students

Page 8: States and School District Reform

The districts we have are not the systems we need

• Schools and students with same needs receiving

different levels of resources

• Unintelligible or unreported school budgets

• Rigidly defined budgets that don’t match needs

• Limited investment in recruiting, screening, &

induction

• Teaching jobs that promote burnout and isolation

• Salary and job structures that do not encourage

effectiveness and contribution

• Traditional schedules and staffing that do not

match time and individual attention to priority

needs or foster professional working conditions

WE HAVE

Effective teaching for all

students

School designs that

maximize teaching

effectiveness, academic

time and individual

attention

WE NEED

8

Equitable, transparent,

and flexible funding

across schools

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES,

INC.

Page 9: States and School District Reform

The districts we have are not the systems we need

WE HAVE WE NEED

9

• Underinvestment in formative assessments

and fragmented professional development

• Limited investment to build and reward

leadership effectiveness over career

• Principal jobs that don’t allow for innovation

• Central office services that are not designed

to improve productivity or customize support

to school needs

• District pays too much for social services and

non-core instruction that could be provided

through community partners

Aligned curriculum,

Instruction, assessment, PD

Strong school and district

leaders

Central services that foster

empowerment, accountability

and efficiency

Partnership with families and

communities

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES,

INC.

Page 10: States and School District Reform

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

District A

Breakout of district

spend on teacher

compensation

Social

Security

Pension

Benefits

Salaries

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 10

ERS Estimates based on district salary schedules and budget data

District B has a “pay for performance” program

Teacher compensation is the biggest single expense category in education – how is it directed?

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

District B

Spending

What drives that spend

on teacher

compensation?

Contribution

Education

Experience

Base

Page 11: States and School District Reform

We see a cycle of isolation and specialization developing that pushes resources away from core instruction

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 11

Diverse, high-needs classes

Teachers under-prepared to

provide core instruction to all

Create supplemental

service requirements

Administration to coordinate,

monitor special services

Resources and responsibility

move away from core instruction

Provide additional support:Extended learning opportunitiesInstructional aidesPull-outs

Class size

reduction can

weaken

teacher quality

Page 12: States and School District Reform

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 12

Which is reflected in a huge gap between a regular education class size of 23 and 7:1 staff to student ratio in this district

7

9

10

12

17

23

0 10 20 30

Pupils per Staff

Pupils per Professional

Pupils per Instructor

Pupils per Teacher

Regular Ed Student Teacher Ratio

Regular Class Size

Example District: Elementary and Secondary School-Level Staffing Ratios

Page 13: States and School District Reform

GEPA Institute April 2010

Mandates and inflexibility make differentiating time and attention where needed difficult to do

13

23

18

0

5

10

15

20

25

District B

HS AVERAGE CLASS SIZE

Core

Non-core

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC.

20% 17%

15%17%

14% 14%

16% 16%

8%8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

District C District B

Core Academic Time by

Subject in HS

Foreign

Language

Social Studies

Science

Math

ELA

Page 14: States and School District Reform

1. Revise funding systems to promote equity and flexibility

2. Revamp teacher compensation, including benefits and pensions, to increase compensation for

teachers who have the best results and contribute

the most to improving student performance

3. Overhaul regulations that strictly define specific staff positions and use of school time

4. Rethink graduation requirements that are linked to taking specific courses rather than demonstrating

skills and knowledge

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 14

Top 10 things states can do in “tough times” to focus resources to their most productive uses …

Page 15: States and School District Reform

5. Create new models of accountability and support for

special education and English language learners that redirect resources to more integrated settings

6. Insist on turnaround strategies that restructure

existing resources and consider district-wide impact, including the challenge of displaced teachers

7. Invest in statewide leadership development and succession planning, including providing information

tools

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 15

Top 10 things states can do…

Page 16: States and School District Reform

8. Remove barriers to creative provision of education and support services by untraditional providers

9. Promote the use of technology as a productivity

improvement tool in education and school support

services

10.Report useful comparative data on school and

district resource use that includes information on

spending by student as well as on the use and

organization of resources

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 16

Top 10 things states can do…

Page 17: States and School District Reform

Industrial Model

TO

Information Age

Rules Guidance & Best Practice models

Compliance Information & Accountability

Enforcement Support

Qualification - Inputs Quality - Outcomes

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 17

States need to adapt and create the conditions to help districts excel in current environment

Page 18: States and School District Reform

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES, INC. 18

As we heard, there is no silver bullet, one size fits all –it is important to thoughtfully prioritize strategies

NO

the time and effort

don’t make sense

YES

plan changes over the

LT and prioritize based

on achievement

impact

MAYBE

if you need a quick or

political win

YES

make the change

NOW!

District Impact(magnitude of misalignment)

LOW HIGH

Ease of

Implementation(barriers ex: contracts,

required, human

capacity and political will)

HARD

EASY

Page 19: States and School District Reform

Thank You!

New Web Address: www.erstrategies.org