Top Banner
State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009
13

State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Baldwin Jordan
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections

March 3, 2009

Page 2: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Why are we talking about this?

• Major economic events have occurred– Pension investment losses– Flat inflation with contractually obligated

increases

• These economic events have a large negative impact on revenues and expenditures

• Budget shortfalls compound

Page 3: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

The impact on the 2010 General Fund

-$140

-$120

-$100

-$80

-$60

-$40

-$20

$0

$20

State SharedRevenues

Property Tax Cap

Police PensionContribution

Forestry Lift

Telephone Savings

Page 4: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Bottom line impact for 2010

Revenues Expenditure Net Change in Fund Balance

November Estimate

$8,538,416 $8,646,110 ($107,694)

Changes ($197,460) $29,723 ($227,183)

February Estimate

$8,340,956 $8,675,833 ($334,877)

Page 5: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

The next shoe to drop… IMRF

• IMRF will release the 2010 rates in April• 2008 investment returns of -24.8%• Actuarial (rate setting) techniques modified

to mitigate rate increases• Our 2010 rate will be at least 8.33%, which

would be a $12,500 increase to the General Fund over projections

• If the rate is 10%, General Fund impact would be $38,000

Page 6: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

It may not be over…

• Future investment losses– IMRF– Police Pension

• State legislation– Reducing or eliminating shared revenues– Possible relief for governments: proposed

legislation removing Police Pension and IMRF levies from Tax Cap. Passage is unlikely.

Page 7: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

We are fiscally conservative, but realistic• Revenues

– use verified sources and actual data whenever possible

• Expenditures– wages are budgeted as actual estimate – no

rounding up.

Page 8: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

5 Year projections

• Necessary to gauge the near and long term outlook of Village services

• Estimates use current (2009) levels of service

• Revenues and expenditures escalate at known amounts if possible, or historical trends

• Near years are more reliable than out years

Page 9: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Notable assumptions: 2010-2013

• Property tax: increase by 0.1% in 2010, 3% thereafter

• Police Pension contribution increases by 32.3% in 2010, 13% thereafter with positive investment income

• State shared revenues growing at moderate 3%• Recreation is at current expenditure levels with

increased revenues from additional fees• Museum funding exists at current level• Sales and other taxes growing at modest levels,

2% to 3%

Page 10: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Fund balance – our savings account

12-31-2009 Projected Reserves (in thousands)

$2,027

$440

$195

$1,138

Cashflow Debt ServiceMisc. Undesignated

Current Village Policy• 25% of expenditures are set aside

for cash flow purposes (Cash Flow Reserve)

• Some dollars are for restricted purposes (Fire insurance, Police forfeitures, etc.)

• Undesignated reserves are available for any purpose

• Reviewed every 2 years• Projections are based on 2008

unaudited projections and will be adjusted upon completion of the financial statements in June, 2009.

Page 11: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

5 Year Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance

-$2.00

$0.00

$2.00

$4.00

$6.00

$8.00

$10.00

$12.00

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Revenues Expenditures Net ChangeIn millions

Page 12: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Available Reserves (as a % of expenditures)

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Cashflow + Undesignated Policy

Page 13: State Shared Revenues and Future Budget Projections March 3, 2009.

Cost control measures

• Continue to review all purchases

• Contractor/ vendor reselection (per review schedule presented to the board last year)

• Competitive bids / requests for proposals to secure low cost providers

• Joint purchasing through WCMC, State and others to achieve economies of scale

• Strict enforcement of purchasing policies