No. 17-15589 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAI‘I; ISMAEL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants – Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai‘i (1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC) EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME 1 JEFFREY B. WALL Acting Solicitor General EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitor General CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General ELIOT ENOKI Acting United States Attorney AUGUST E. FLENTJE Special Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General DOUGLAS N. LETTER SHARON SWINGLE H. THOMAS BYRON III LOWELL V. STURGILL JR. ANNE MURPHY Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7241 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20530 (202) 353-2689 Case: 17-15589, 04/07/2017, ID: 10388991, DktEntry: 24-1, Page 1 of 70
245
Embed
State of Hawaii v. Trump - Excerpts of Record Volume 1...Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh, Ph.D., now move to convert the TRO to a preliminary injunction. Pls.’ Mot. to Convert TRO to
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
No. 17-15589
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAI‘I; ISMAEL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs – Appellees, v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants – Appellants.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai‘i
(1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC)
EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME 1
JEFFREY B. WALL Acting Solicitor General
EDWIN S. KNEEDLER
Deputy Solicitor General
CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General
ELIOT ENOKI Acting United States Attorney
AUGUST E. FLENTJE Special Counsel to the Assistant Attorney
General DOUGLAS N. LETTER SHARON SWINGLE H. THOMAS BYRON III LOWELL V. STURGILL JR. ANNE MURPHY
Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7241 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20530 (202) 353-2689
Order Granting Motion to Convert Temporary Restraining Order To a Preliminary Injunction (Mar. 29, 2017) Docket Entry 270 ............................................................................................. 1 Order Granting Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Mar. 15, 2017) Docket Entry 219 ........................................................................................... 25
their burden of establishing a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their
Establishment Clause claim, that irreparable injury is likely if the requested relief is
not issued, and that the balance of the equities and public interest counsel in favor of
granting the requested relief. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion (ECF No. 238) is
GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
The Court briefly recounts the factual and procedural background relevant to
Plaintiffs’ Motion. A fuller recitation of the facts is set forth in the Court’s TRO.
See TRO 3–14, ECF No. 219.
I. The President’s Executive Orders
A. Executive Order No. 13,769
On January 27, 2017, the President of the United States issued Executive
Order No. 13,769 entitled, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into
the United States,” 82 Fed. Reg. 8977 (Jan. 27, 2017).1 On March 6, 2017, the
1On February 3, 2017, the State filed its complaint and an initial motion for TRO, which sought to enjoin Sections 3(c), 5(a)–(c), and 5(e) of Executive Order No. 13,769. Pls.’ Mot. for TRO, Feb. 3, 2017, ECF No. 2. The Court stayed the case (see ECF Nos. 27 & 32) after the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington entered a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the Government from enforcing the same provisions of Executive Order No. 13,769 targeted by the State. See Washington v. Trump, No. C17-0141JLR, 2017 WL 462040 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 3, 2017). On February 4, 2017, the Government filed an emergency motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seeking a stay of the Washington TRO, pending appeal. That emergency motion was denied on February 9, 2017. See Washington v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir.) (per curium), denying reconsideration en banc, --- F.3d ---, 2017
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 2 of 24 PageID #: 5164
President issued another Executive Order, No. 13,780, identically entitled,
“Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States” (the
“Executive Order”), 82 Fed. Reg. 13209. Like its predecessor, the Executive Order
restricts the entry of foreign nationals from specified countries and suspends the
United States refugee program for specified periods of time.
B. Executive Order No. 13,780
Section 1 of the Executive Order declares that its purpose is to “protect
[United States] citizens from terrorist attacks, including those committed by foreign
nationals.” By its terms, the Executive Order also represents a response to the
Ninth Circuit’s per curiam decision in Washington v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151.
According to the Government, it “clarifies and narrows the scope of Executive
action regarding immigration, extinguishes the need for emergent consideration, and
eliminates the potential constitutional concerns identified by the Ninth Circuit.”
Notice of Filing of Executive Order 4–5, ECF No. 56.
Section 2 suspends from “entry into the United States” for a period of 90 days,
certain nationals of six countries referred to in Section 217(a)(12) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq.: Iran, Libya, Somalia,
WL 992527 (9th Cir. 2017). On March 8, 2017, the Ninth Circuit granted the Government’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. See Order, Case No. 17-35105 (9th Cir. Mar. 8, 2017), ECF No. 187.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 3 of 24 PageID #: 5165
Townley v. Miller, 722 F.3d 1128, 1133 (9th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 907
(2014)). On the record presented at this preliminary stage of the proceedings,
Plaintiffs meet the threshold Article III standing requirements.
B. The State Has Standing
For the reasons stated in the TRO, the State has standing based upon injuries
to its proprietary interests. See TRO 16–21.2
The State sufficiently identified monetary and intangible injuries to the
University of Hawaii. See, e.g., Suppl. Decl. of Risa E. Dickson, Mot. for TRO, Ex.
D-1, ECF No. 66-6; Original Dickson Decl., Mot. for TRO, Ex. D-2, ECF No. 66-7.
The Court previously found these types of injuries to be nearly indistinguishable
from those found sufficient to confer standing according to the Ninth Circuit’s
Washington decision. See 847 F.3d at 1161 (“The necessary connection can be
drawn in at most two logical steps: (1) the Executive Order prevents nationals of
seven countries from entering Washington and Minnesota; (2) as a result, some of
these people will not enter state universities, some will not join those universities as
faculty, some will be prevented from performing research, and some will not be
2The Court once again does not reach the State’s alternative standing theory based on protecting the interests of its citizens as parens patriae. See Washington, 847 F.3d at 1168 n.5 (“The States have asserted other proprietary interests and also presented an alternative standing theory based on their ability to advance the interests of their citizens as parens patriae. Because we conclude that the States’ proprietary interests as operators of their public universities are sufficient to support standing, we need not reach those arguments.”).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 9 of 24 PageID #: 5171
The Court determined in its TRO that the preliminary evidence demonstrates
the Executive Order’s failure to satisfy Lemon’s first test. See TRO 33–36. The
Court will not repeat that discussion here. As no new evidence contradicting the
purpose identified by the Court has been submitted by the parties since the issuance
of the March 15, 2017 TRO, there is no reason to disturb the Court’s prior
determination.
Instead, the Federal Defendants take a different tack. They once more urge
the Court not to look beyond the four corners of the Executive Order. According to
the Government, the Court must afford the President deference in the national
security context and should not “‘look behind the exercise of [the President’s]
discretion’ taken ‘on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason.’” Govt.
Mem. in Opp’n to Mot. for TRO 42–43 (quoting Kliendienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S.
753, 770 (1972)), ECF No. 145. No binding authority, however, has decreed that
Establishment Clause jurisprudence ends at the Executive’s door. In fact, every
court that has considered whether to apply the Establishment Clause to either the
Executive Order or its predecessor (regardless of the ultimate outcome) has done
so.4 Significantly, this Court is constrained by the binding precedent and guidance
4See Sarsour v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-00120 AJT-IDD, 2017 WL 1113305, at *11 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2017) (“[T]he Court rejects the Defendants’ position that since President Trump has offered a legitimate, rational, and non-discriminatory purpose stated in EO-2, this Court must confine its
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 15 of 24 PageID #: 5177
offered in Washington. There, citing Lemon, the Ninth Circuit clearly indicated
that the Executive Order is subject to the very type of secular purpose review
conducted by this Court in considering the TRO. Washington, 847 F.3d at 1167–
68; id. at 1162 (stating that Mandel does not apply to the “promulgation of sweeping
immigration policy” at the “highest levels of the political branches”).
The Federal Defendants’ arguments, advanced from the very inception of this
action, make sense from this perspective—where the “historical context and ‘the
specific sequence of events leading up to’” the adoption of the challenged Executive
Order are as full of religious animus, invective, and obvious pretext as is the record
here, it is no wonder that the Government urges the Court to altogether ignore that
history and context. See McCreary Cty. v. Am. Civil Liberties Union of Ky., 545
U.S. 844, 862 (2005). The Court, however, declines to do so. Washington, 847
analysis of the constitutional validity of EO-2 to the four corners of the Order.”) (citations omitted); Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, No. TDC-17-0361, 2017 WL 1018235, at *16 (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2017) (“Defendants argue that because the Establishment Clause claim implicates Congress’s plenary power over immigration as delegated to the President, the Court need only consider whether the Government has offered a ‘facially legitimate and bona fide reason’ for its action. Mandel, 408 U.S. at 777 . . . . [A]lthough ‘[t]he Executive has broad discretion over the admission and exclusion of aliens,’ that discretion ‘may not transgress constitutional limitations,’ and it is ‘the duty of the courts’ to ‘say where those statutory and constitutional boundaries lie.’ Abourezk[ v. Reagan], 785 F.2d [1043,] 1061 [(D.C. Cir. 1986)].”); Aziz v. Trump, No. 1:17-CV-116 LMB-TCB, 2017 WL 580855, at *8 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017) (“Moreover, even if Mandel[, 408 U.S. at 770,] did apply, it requires that the proffered executive reason be ‘bona fide.’ As the Second and Ninth Circuits have persuasively held, if the proffered ‘facially legitimate’ reason has been given in ‘bad faith,’ it is not ‘bona fide.’ Am. Academy of Religion v. Napolitano, 573 F.3d 115, 126 (2d Cir. 2009); Bustamante v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 1059, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008). That leaves the Court in the same position as in an ordinary secular purpose case: determining whether the proffered reason for the EO is the real reason.”)).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 16 of 24 PageID #: 5178
F.3d at 1167 (“It is well established that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the
challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection
Clause claims.”). The Court will not crawl into a corner, pull the shutters closed,
and pretend it has not seen what it has.5 The Supreme Court and this Circuit both
dictate otherwise, and that is the law this Court is bound to follow.
B. Future Executive Action
The Court’s preliminary determination does not foreclose future Executive
action. The Court recognizes that it is not the case that the Administration’s past
conduct must forever taint any effort by it to address the security concerns of the
nation. See TRO 38–39. Based upon the preliminary record available, however,
one cannot conclude that the actions taken during the interval between revoked
Executive Order No. 13,769 and the new Executive Order represent “genuine
changes in constitutionally significant conditions.” McCreary, 545 U.S. at 874
(emphasis added).
The Government emphasizes that “the Executive Branch revised the new
Executive Order to avoid any Establishment Clause concerns,” and, in particular,
5See Int’l Refugee Assistance Project, 2017 WL 1018235, at *14 (“Defendants have cited no authority concluding that a court assessing purpose under the Establishment Clause may consider only statements made by government employees at the time that they were government employees. Simply because a decisionmaker made the statements during a campaign does not wipe them from the ‘reasonable memory’ of a ‘reasonable observer.’” (quoting McCreary, 545 U.S. at 866)).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 17 of 24 PageID #: 5179
religious objective permeated the government’s action,” and not merely the
promulgation of Section 2(c). McCreary, 545 U.S. at 863; see SAC ¶¶ 36–38, 58,
107; TRO 16, 24–25, 42. Put another way, the historical context and evidence
relied on by the Court, highlighted by the comments of the Executive and his
surrogates, does not parse between Section 2 and Section 6, nor does it do so
between subsections within Section 2. Accordingly, there is no basis to narrow the
Court’s ruling in the manner requested by the Federal Defendants.6 See Church of
the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 539–40 (1993) (“[It
would be] implausible to suggest that [Section 2(c)] but not the [other Sections] had
as [its] object the suppression of [or discrimination against a] religion. . . . We need
not decide whether the Ordinance 87–72 could survive constitutional scrutiny if it
existed separately; it must be invalidated because it functions, with the rest of the
enactments in question, to suppress Santeria religious worship.”).
6Plaintiffs further note that the Executive Order “bans refugees at a time when the publicized refugee crisis is focused on Muslim-majority nations.” Reply in Supp. of Mot. to Convert TRO to Prelim. Inj. 14. Indeed, according to Pew Research Center analysis of data from the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center, a total of 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the United States in fiscal year 2016, accounting for nearly half of the almost 85,000 refugees who entered the country during that period. See Br. of Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, & Other Major Cities & Counties as Amici Curiae in Supp. of Pls.’ Mot. to Convert TRO to Prelim. Inj. 12, ECF No. 271-1 (citing Phillip Connor, U.S. Admits Record Number of Muslim Refugees in 2016, Pew Research Center (Oct. 5, 2016), http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/10/05/u-s-admits-record-number-ofmuslim-refugees-in-2016). “That means the U.S. has admitted the highest number of Muslim refugees of any year since date of self-reported religious affiliations first became publicly available in 2002.” Id.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 21 of 24 PageID #: 5183
State of Hawaii, et al. v. Trump, et al.; Civ. No. 17-00050 DKW-KSC; ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONVERT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 270 Filed 03/29/17 Page 24 of 24 PageID #: 5186
revokes Executive Order No. 13,769 upon taking effect.1 Exec. Order §§ 13, 14.
Like its predecessor, the Executive Order restricts the entry of foreign nationals from
specified countries and suspends entrants from the United States refugee program
for specified periods of time.
Plaintiffs State of Hawai‘i (“State”) and Ismail Elshikh, Ph.D. seek a
nationwide temporary restraining order that would prohibit the Federal Defendants2
from “enforcing or implementing Sections 2 and 6 of the Executive Order” before it
takes effect. Pls.’ Mot. for TRO 4, Mar. 8, 2017, ECF No. 65.3 Upon evaluation
of the parties’ submissions, and following a hearing on March 15, 2017, the Court
concludes that, on the record before it, Plaintiffs have met their burden of
establishing a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their Establishment
Clause claim, that irreparable injury is likely if the requested relief is not issued, and
that the balance of the equities and public interest counsel in favor of granting the
requested relief. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO (ECF. No. 65) is granted
for the reasons detailed below.
1By its terms, the Executive Order becomes effective as of March 16, 2017 at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time—i.e., March 15, 2017 at 6:01 p.m. Hawaii Time. Exec. Order § 14. 2Defendants in the instant action are: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States; the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); John F. Kelly, in his official capacity as Secretary of DHS; the U.S. Department of State; Rex Tillerson, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the United States of America. 3Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (“SAC”) on March 8, 2017 simultaneous with their Motion for TRO. SAC, ECF. No. 64.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 2 of 43 PageID #: 4357
Executive Order No. 13,769 became effective upon signing on January 27,
2017. See 82 Fed. Reg. 8977. It inspired several lawsuits across the nation in the
days that followed.4 Among those lawsuits was this one: On February 3, 2017, the
State filed its complaint and an initial motion for TRO, which sought to enjoin,
nationwide, Sections 3(c), 5(a)–(c), and 5(e) of Executive Order No. 13,769. Pls.’
Mot. for TRO, Feb. 3, 2017, ECF No. 2.
This Court did not rule on the State’s initial TRO motion because later that
same day, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
entered a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the Government from
enforcing the same provisions of Executive Order No. 13,769 targeted by the State
here. See Washington v. Trump, 2017 WL 462040. As such, the Court stayed this
case, effective February 7, 2017, specifying that the stay would continue “as long as
4See, e.g., Mohammed v. United States, No. 2:17-cv-00786-AB-PLA (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2017); City & Cty. of San Francisco v. Trump, No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2017); Louhghalam v. Trump, Civil Action No. 17-cv-10154, 2017 WL 386550 (D. Mass. Jan. 29, 2017); Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, No. 8:17-0361-TDC (D. Md. filed Feb. 7, 2017); Darweesh v. Trump, 17 Civ. 480 (AMD), 2017 WL 388504 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2017); Aziz v. Trump, --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2017 WL 580855 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017); Washington v. Trump, Case No. C17-0141JLR, 2017 WL 462040 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 3, 2017), emergency stay denied, 847 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2017). This list is not exhaustive.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 3 of 43 PageID #: 4358
the February 3, 2017 injunction entered in Washington v. Trump remain[ed] in full
force and effect, or until further order of this Court.” ECF Nos. 27 & 32.
On February 4, 2017, the Government filed an emergency motion in the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals seeking a stay of the Washington TRO, pending appeal.5
See Washington v. Trump, No. 17-35105 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2017). The Ninth Circuit
heard oral argument on February 7, after which it denied the emergency motion via
written Order dated February 9, 2017. See Case No. 17-35105, ECF Nos. 125 (Tr.
of Hr’g), 134 (Filed Order for Publication at 847 F.3d 1151).
On March 8, 2017, the Ninth Circuit granted the Government’s unopposed
motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. See Order, No. 17-35105 (9th Cir. Mar. 8,
2017), ECF No. 187. As a result, the same sections of Executive Order No. 13,769
initially challenged by the State in the instant action remain enjoined as of the date of
this Order.
B. The New Executive Order
Section 2 of the new Executive Order suspends from “entry into the United
States” for a period of 90 days, certain nationals of six countries referred to in
Section 217(a)(12) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C.
5The Government also requested “an immediate administrative stay pending full consideration of the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal” on February 4, 2017 (Emergency Mot. to Stay, No. 17-35105 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 14), which the Ninth Circuit panel swiftly denied (Order, No. 17-35105 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 15).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 4 of 43 PageID #: 4359
§ 1101 et seq.: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.6 8 U.S.C.
§ 1187(a)(12); Exec. Order § 2(c). The suspension of entry applies to nationals of
these six countries who (1) are outside the United States on the new Executive
Order’s effective date of March 16, 2017; (2) do not have a valid visa on that date,
and (3) did not have a valid visa as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on January
27, 2017 (the date of the prior Executive Order, No. 13,769). Exec. Order § 3(a).
The 90-day suspension does not apply to: (1) lawful permanent residents; (2)
any foreign national admitted to or paroled into the United States on or after the
Executive Order’s effective date (March 16, 2017); (3) any individual who has a
document other than a visa, valid on the effective date of the Executive Order or
issued anytime thereafter, that permits travel to the United States, such as an advance
parole document; (4) any dual national traveling on a passport not issued by one of
the six listed countries; (5) any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic-type or
other specified visa; and (6) any foreign national who has been granted asylum, any
refugee already admitted to the United States, or any individual granted withholding
of removal, advance parole, or protection under the Convention Against Torture.
See Exec. Order § 3(b).
6Because of the “close cooperative relationship” between the United States and the Iraqi government, the Executive Order declares that Iraq no longer merits inclusion in this list of countries, as it was in Executive Order No. 13,769. Iraq “presents a special case.” Exec. Order § 1(g).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 5 of 43 PageID #: 4360
Under Section 3(c)’s waiver provision, foreign nationals of the six countries
who are subject to the suspension of entry may nonetheless seek entry on a
case-by-case basis. The Executive Order includes the following list of
circumstances when such waivers “could be appropriate:”
(i) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other longterm activity, is outside the United States on the effective date of the Order, seeks to reenter the United States to resume that activity, and denial of reentry during the suspension period would impair that activity; (ii) the foreign national has previously established significant contacts with the United States but is outside the United States on the effective date of the Order for work, study, or other lawful activity; (iii) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant business or professional obligations and the denial of entry during the suspension period would impair those obligations; (iv) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship; (v) the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case; (vi) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United States Government (or is an eligible dependent of
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 6 of 43 PageID #: 4361
such an employee) and the employee can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government; (vii) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOAI), 22 U.S.C. § 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under IOIA; (viii) the foreign national is a landed Canadian immigrant who applies for admission at a land border port of entry or a preclearance location located in Canada; or (ix) the foreign national is traveling as a United States Government sponsored exchange visitor.
Exec. Order § 3(c).
Section 6 of the Executive Order suspends the U.S. Refugee Admissions
Program for 120 days. The suspension applies both to travel into the United States
and to decisions on applications for refugee status for the same period. See Exec.
Order § 6(a). It excludes refugee applicants who were formally scheduled for
transit by the Department of State before the March 16, 2017 effective date. Like
the 90-day suspension, the 120-day suspension includes a waiver provision that
allows the Secretaries of State and DHS to admit refugee applicants on a
case-by-case basis. See Exec. Order § 6(c). The Executive Order identifies
examples of circumstances in which waivers may be warranted, including: where
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 7 of 43 PageID #: 4362
the admission of the individual would allow the United States to conform its conduct
to a pre-existing international agreement or denying admission would cause undue
hardship. Exec. Order § 6(c). Unlike Executive Order No. 13,769, the new
Executive Order does not expressly refer to an individual’s status as a “religious
minority” or refer to any particular religion, and it does not include a Syria-specific
ban on refugees.
Section 1 states that the purpose of the Executive Order is to “protect [United
States] citizens from terrorist attacks, including those committed by foreign
nationals.” Section 1(h) identifies two examples of terrorism-related crimes
committed in the United States by persons entering the country either “legally on
visas” or “as refugees”:
[1] In January 2013, two Iraqi nationals admitted to the United States as refugees in 2009 were sentenced to 40 years and to life in prison, respectively, for multiple terrorism-related offenses. [2] [I]n October 2014, a native of Somalia who had been brought to the United States as a child refugee and later became a naturalized United States citizen was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction[.]
Exec. Order § 1(h).
By its terms, the Executive Order also represents a response to the Ninth
Circuit’s decision in Washington v. Trump. See 847 F.3d 1151. According to the
Government, it “clarifies and narrows the scope of Executive action regarding
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 8 of 43 PageID #: 4363
economy, and sovereign interest in maintaining the separation between church and
state. SAC ¶¶ 4–5.
According to Plaintiffs, the Executive order also results in “their having to
live in a country and in a State where there is the perception that the Government has
established a disfavored religion.” SAC ¶ 5. Plaintiffs assert that by singling out
nationals from the six predominantly Muslim countries, the Executive Order causes
harm by stigmatizing not only immigrants and refugees, but also Muslim citizens of
the United States. Plaintiffs point to public statements by the President and his
advisors regarding the implementation of a “Muslim ban,” which Plaintiffs contend
is the tacit and illegitimate motivation underlying the Executive Order. See SAC
¶¶ 35–51. For example, Plaintiffs point to the following statements made
contemporaneously with the implementation of Executive Order No. 13,769 and in
its immediate aftermath:
48. In an interview on January 25, 2017, Mr. Trump discussed his plans to implement “extreme vetting” of people seeking entry into the United States. He remarked: “[N]o, it’s not the Muslim ban. But it’s countries that have tremendous terror. . . . [I]t’s countries that people are going to come in and cause us tremendous problems.” 49. Two days later, on January 27, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order entitled, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.”
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 10 of 43 PageID #: 4365
50. The first Executive Order [No. 13,769] was issued without a notice and comment period and without interagency review. Moreover, the first Executive Order was issued with little explanation of how it could further its stated objective. 51. When signing the first Executive Order [No. 13,769], President Trump read the title, looked up, and said: “We all know what that means.” President Trump said he was “establishing a new vetting measure to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America,” and that: “We don’t want them here.” . . . . 58. In a January 27, 2017 interview with Christian Broadcasting Network, President Trump said that persecuted Christians would be given priority under the first Executive Order. He said (once again, falsely): “Do you know if you were a Christian in Syria it was impossible, at least very tough to get into the United States? If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair, everybody was persecuted in all fairness, but they were chopping off the heads of everybody but more so the Christians. And I thought it was very, very unfair. So we are going to help them.” 59. The day after signing the first Executive Order [No. 13,769], President Trump’s advisor, Rudolph Giuliani, explained on television how the Executive Order came to be. He said: “When [Mr. Trump] first announced it, he said, ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.’” 60. The President and his spokespersons defended the rushed nature of their issuance of the first Executive Order [No. 13,769] on January 27, 2017, by saying that their urgency was imperative to stop the inflow of dangerous persons to the United States. On January 30, 2017, President Trump tweeted: “If the ban were
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 11 of 43 PageID #: 4366
announced with a one week notice, the ‘bad’ would rush into our country during that week.” In a forum on January 30, 2017 at George Washington University, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said: “At the end of the day, what was the other option? To rush it out quickly, telegraph it five days so that people could rush into this country and undermine the safety of our nation?” On February 9, 2017, President Trump claimed he had sought a one-month delay between signing and implementation, but was told by his advisors that “you can’t do that because then people are gonna pour in before the toughness.”
SAC ¶¶ 48–51, 58–60 (footnotes and citations omitted).
Plaintiffs also highlight statements by members of the Administration prior to
the signing of the new Executive Order, seeking to tie its content to Executive Order
No. 13,769 enjoined by the Washington TRO. In particular, they note that:
On February 21, Senior Advisor to the President, Stephen Miller, told Fox News that the new travel ban would have the same effect as the old one. He said: “Fundamentally, you’re still going to have the same basic policy outcome for the country, but you’re going to be responsive to a lot of very technical issues that were brought up by the court and those will be addressed. But in terms of protecting the country, those basic policies are still going to be in effect.”
SAC ¶ 74(a) (citing Miller: New order will be responsive to the judicial ruling; Rep.
Ron DeSantis: Congress has gotten off to a slow start, The First 100 Days (Fox
News television broadcast Feb. 21, 2017), transcript available at
https://goo.gl/wcHvHH (rush transcript)). Plaintiffs argue that, in light of these and
similar statements “where the President himself has repeatedly and publicly
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 12 of 43 PageID #: 4367
adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so
largely depends for illumination.’” Catholic League for Religious & Civil Rights v.
City & Cty. of San Francisco, 624 F.3d 1043, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc)
(quoting Massachusetts, 549 U.S. at 517)).
“At this very preliminary stage of the litigation, the [Plaintiffs] may rely on
the allegations in their Complaint and whatever other evidence they submitted in
support of their TRO motion to meet their burden.” Washington, 847 F.3d at 1159
(citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561). “With these allegations and evidence, the
[Plaintiffs] must make a ‘clear showing of each element of standing.’” Id. (quoting
Townley v. Miller, 722 F.3d 1128, 1133 (9th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 907
(2014)). At this preliminary stage of the proceedings, on the record presented,
Plaintiffs meet the threshold Article III standing requirements.
B. The State Has Standing
The State alleges standing based both upon injuries to its proprietary interests
and to its quasi-sovereign interests, i.e., in its role as parens patriae.7 Just as the
7The State’s parens patriae theory focuses on the Executive Order
subject[ing] citizens of Hawai‘i like Dr. Elshikh to discrimination and marginalization while denying all residents of the State the benefits of a pluralistic and inclusive society. Hawai‘i has a quasi-sovereign interest in ‘securing [its] residents from the harmful effects of discrimination.’ Alfred L. Snapp & Son v. Puerto Rico, 458 U.S. 592, 609 (1982). The [Executive]
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 16 of 43 PageID #: 4371
could obtain the relief they ask for: a declaration that the Executive Order violates
the Constitution and an injunction barring its enforcement.”).
The second proprietary injury alleged Hawaii alleges is to the State’s main
economic driver: tourism. The State contends that the Executive Order will “have
the effect of depressing international travel to and tourism in Hawai‘i,” which
“directly harms Hawaii’s businesses and, in turn, the State’s revenue.” SAC ¶ 100,
ECF No. 64. See also Suppl. Decl. of Luis P. Salaveria ¶¶ 6–10, Mot. for TRO, Ex.
C-1, ECF No. 66-4 (“I expect, given the uncertainty the new executive order and its
predecessor have caused to international travel generally, that these changing
policies may depress tourism, business travel, and financial investments in
Hawaii.”). The State points to preliminary data from the Hawaii Tourism
Authority, which suggests that during the interval of time that the first Executive
Order was in place, the number of visitors to Hawai‘i from the Middle East dropped
(data including visitors from Iran, Iraq, Syria and Yemen). See Suppl. Decl. of
George Szigeti, ¶¶ 5–8, Mot. for TRO, Ex. B-1, ECF No. 66-2; see also SAC ¶ 100
(identifying 278 visitors in January 2017, compared to 348 visitors from that same
region in January 2016).8 Tourism accounted for $15 billion in spending in 2015,
8This data relates to the prior Executive Order No. 13,769. At this preliminary stage, the Court looks to the earlier order’s effect on tourism in order to gauge the economic impact of the new Executive Order, while understanding that the provisions of the two differ. Because the new
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 20 of 43 PageID #: 4375
and a decline in tourism has a direct effect on the State’s revenue. See SAC ¶ 18.
Because there is preliminary evidence that losses of current and future revenue are
traceable to the Executive Order, this injury to the State’s proprietary interest also
appears sufficient to confer standing. Cf. Texas v. United States, 809 F.3d 134,
155–56 (5th Cir. 2015), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016)
(holding that the “financial loss[es]” that Texas would bear, due to having to grant
drivers licenses, constituted a concrete and immediate injury for standing purposes).
For purposes of the instant Motion for TRO, the State has preliminarily
demonstrated that: (1) its universities will suffer monetary damages and intangible
harms; (2) the State’s economy is likely to suffer a loss of revenue due to a decline in
tourism; (3) such harms can be sufficiently linked to the Executive Order; and
(4) the State would not suffer the harms to its proprietary interests in the absence of
implementation of the Executive Order. Accordingly, at this early stage of the
litigation, the State has satisfied the requirements of Article III standing.9
Executive Order has yet to take effect, its precise economic impact cannot presently be determined. 9To the extent the Government argues that the State does not have standing to bring an Establishment Clause violation on its own behalf, the Court does not reach this argument. Cf. Washington, 847 F.3d at 1160 n.4 (“The Government argues that the States may not bring Establishment Clause claims because they lack Establishment Clause rights. Even if we assume that States lack such rights, an issue we need not decide, that is irrelevant in this case because the States are asserting the rights of their students and professors. Male doctors do not have personal rights in abortion and yet any physician may assert those rights on behalf of his female patients.” (citing Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 118 (1976))). Unlike in Washington where there was no
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 21 of 43 PageID #: 4376
required.” Catholic League, 624 F.3d at 1048–49. In Establishment Clause
cases—
[e]ndorsement sends a message to nonadherents that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community. Disapproval sends the opposite message.” Plaintiffs aver that not only does the resolution make them feel like second-class citizens, but that their participation in the political community will be chilled by the [government’s] hostility to their church and their religion.
Id. at 1048–49 (quoting Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 688 (1984) (O’Connor, J.,
concurring)). Dr. Elshikh attests that he and his family suffer just such injuries
here. He declares that the effects of the Executive Order are “devastating to me, my
wife and children.” Elshikh Decl. ¶ 6, ECF No. 66-1.
Like his children, Dr. Elshikh is “deeply saddened by the message that [both
Executive Orders] convey—that a broad travel-ban is ‘needed’ to prevent people
from certain Muslim countries from entering the United States.” Elshikh Decl. ¶ 1
(“Because of my allegiance to America, and my deep belief in the American ideals
of democracy and equality, I am deeply saddened by the passage of the Executive
Order barring nationals from now-six Muslim majority countries from entering the
United States.”); id. ¶ 3 ([“My children] are deeply affected by the knowledge that
the United States—their own country—would discriminate against individuals who
are of the same ethnicity as them, including members of their own family, and who
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 24 of 43 PageID #: 4379
220 F.3d 1134, 1138 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). In fact, the ripeness inquiry is often
“characterized as standing on a timeline.” Id. “A claim is not ripe for adjudication
if it rests upon ‘contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed
may not occur at all.’” Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (quoting
Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Prods. Co., 473 U.S. 568, 580–81 (1985)).
The Government argues that “the only concrete injury Elshikh alleges is that
the Order ‘will prevent [his] mother-in-law’—a Syrian national who lacks a
visa—from visiting Elshikh and his family in Hawaii.” These claims are not ripe,
according to the Government, because there is a visa waiver process that Elshikh’s
mother-in-law has yet to even initiate. Govt. Mem. in Opp’n to Mot. for TRO
(citing SAC ¶ 85), ECF No. 145.
The Government’s premise is not true. Dr. Elshikh alleges direct, concrete
injuries to both himself and his immediate family that are independent of his
mother-in-law’s visa status. See, e.g., SAC ¶¶ 88–90; Elshikh Decl. ¶¶ 1, 3.10
These alleged injuries have already occurred and will continue to occur once the
10There is no dispute that Dr. Elshikh’s mother-in-law does not currently possess a valid visa, would be barred from entering as a Syrian national by Section 2(c) of the Executive Order, and has not yet applied for a waiver under Section 3(c) of the Executive Order. Since the Executive Order is not yet effective, it is difficult to see how she could. None of these propositions, however, alter the Court’s finding that Dr. Elshikh has sufficiently established, at this preliminary stage, that he has suffered an injury-in-fact separate and apart from his mother-in-law that is sufficiently concrete, particularized, and actual to confer standing.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 26 of 43 PageID #: 4381
Clause analysis to a purely mathematical exercise. See Aziz, 2017 WL 580855, at
*9 (rejecting the argument that “the Court cannot infer an anti-Muslim animus
because [Executive Order No. 13,769] does not affect all, or even most, Muslims,”
because “the Supreme Court has never reduced its Establishment Clause
jurisprudence to a mathematical exercise. It is a discriminatory purpose that
matters, no matter how inefficient the execution” (citation omitted)). Equally
flawed is the notion that the Executive Order cannot be found to have targeted Islam
because it applies to all individuals in the six referenced countries. It is undisputed,
using the primary source upon which the Government itself relies, that these six
countries have overwhelmingly Muslim populations that range from 90.7% to
99.8%.12 It would therefore be no paradigmatic leap to conclude that targeting
these countries likewise targets Islam. Certainly, it would be inappropriate to
conclude, as the Government does, that it does not.
The Government compounds these shortcomings by suggesting that the
Executive Order’s neutral text is what this Court must rely on to evaluate purpose.
Govt. Mem. in Opp’n at 42–43 (“[C]ourts may not ‘look behind the exercise of
[Executive] discretion’ taken ‘on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide
12See Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures Project, Muslim Population by Country (2010), available at http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/religions/muslims.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 31 of 43 PageID #: 4386
reason.’”). Only a few weeks ago, the Ninth Circuit commanded otherwise: “It is
well established that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may
be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims.”
Washington, 847 F.3d at 1167–68 (citing Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v.
City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 534 (1993) (“Official action that targets religious
conduct for distinctive treatment cannot be shielded by mere compliance with the
requirement of facial neutrality.”); Larson, 456 U.S. at 254–55 (holding that a
facially neutral statute violated the Establishment Clause in light of legislative
history demonstrating an intent to apply regulations only to minority religions); and
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metro. Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 266–68
(1977) (explaining that circumstantial evidence of intent, including the historical
background of the decision and statements by decisionmakers, may be considered in
evaluating whether a governmental action was motivated by a discriminatory
purpose)). The Supreme Court has been even more emphatic: courts may not “turn
a blind eye to the context in which [a] policy arose.” McCreary Cty. v. Am. Civil
Liberties Union of Ky., 545 U.S. 844, 866 (2005) (citation and quotation signals
omitted).13 “[H]istorical context and ‘the specific sequence of events leading up
13In McCreary, the Supreme Court examined whether the posting of successive Ten Commandments displays at two county courthouses violated the Establishment Clause. 545 U.S. at 850–82.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 32 of 43 PageID #: 4387
to’” the adoption of a challenged policy are relevant considerations. Id. at 862; see
also Aziz, 2017 WL 580855, at *7.
A review of the historical background here makes plain why the Government
wishes to focus on the Executive Order’s text, rather than its context. The record
before this Court is unique. It includes significant and unrebutted evidence of
religious animus driving the promulgation of the Executive Order and its related
predecessor. For example—
In March 2016, Mr. Trump said, during an interview, “I think Islam hates us.” Mr. Trump was asked, “Is there a war between the West and radical Islam, or between the West and Islam itself?” He replied: “It’s very hard to separate. Because you don’t know who’s who.”
SAC ¶ 41 (citing Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees: Exclusive Interview With Donald
Trump (CNN television broadcast Mar. 9, 2016, 8:00 PM ET), transcript available
at https://goo.gl/y7s2kQ)). In that same interview, Mr. Trump stated: “But there’s
a tremendous hatred. And we have to be very vigilant. We have to be very
careful. And we can’t allow people coming into this country who have this hatred
of the United States. . . [a]nd of people that are not Muslim.”
Plaintiffs allege that “[l]ater, as the presumptive Republican nominee, Mr.
Trump began using facially neutral language, at times, to describe the Muslim ban.”
SAC ¶ 42. For example, they point to a July 24, 2016 interview:
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 33 of 43 PageID #: 4388
Mr. Trump was asked: “The Muslim ban. I think you’ve pulled back from it, but you tell me.” Mr. Trump responded: “I don’t think it’s a rollback. In fact, you could say it’s an expansion. I’m looking now at territories. People were so upset when I used the word Muslim. Oh, you can’t use the word Muslim. Remember this. And I’m okay with that, because I’m talking territory instead of Muslim.”
SAC ¶ 44; Ex. 7 (Meet the Press (NBC television broadcast July 24, 2016),
transcript available at https://goo.gl/jHc6aU). And during an October 9, 2016
televised presidential debate, Mr. Trump was asked:
“Your running mate said this week that the Muslim ban is no longer your position. Is that correct? And if it is, was it a mistake to have a religious test?” Mr. Trump replied: “The Muslim ban is something that in some form has morphed into a[n] extreme vetting from certain areas of the world.” When asked to clarify whether “the Muslim ban still stands,” Mr. Trump said, “It’s called extreme vetting.”
SAC ¶ 45 (citing The American Presidency Project, Presidential Debates:
Presidential Debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri (Oct. 9, 2016),
available at https://goo.gl/iIzf0A)).
The Government appropriately cautions that, in determining purpose, courts
should not look into the “veiled psyche” and “secret motives” of government
decisionmakers and may not undertake a “judicial psychoanalysis of a drafter’s heart
of hearts.” Govt. Opp’n at 40 (citing McCreary, 545 U.S. at 862). The
Government need not fear. The remarkable facts at issue here require no such
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 34 of 43 PageID #: 4389
impermissible inquiry. For instance, there is nothing “veiled” about this press
release: “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims
entering the United States.[]” SAC ¶ 38, Ex. 6 (Press Release, Donald J. Trump for
President, Donald J. Trump Statement on Preventing Muslim Immigration (Dec. 7,
2015), available at https://goo.gl/D3OdJJ)). Nor is there anything “secret” about
the Executive’s motive specific to the issuance of the Executive Order:
Rudolph Giuliani explained on television how the Executive Order came to be. He said: “When [Mr. Trump] first announced it, he said, ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.’”
SAC ¶ 59, Ex. 8. On February 21, 2017, commenting on the then-upcoming
revision to the Executive Order, the President’s Senior Adviser, Stephen Miller,
stated, “Fundamentally, [despite “technical” revisions meant to address the Ninth
Circuit’s concerns in Washington,] you’re still going to have the same basic policy
outcome [as the first].” SAC ¶ 74.
These plainly-worded statements,14 made in the months leading up to and
contemporaneous with the signing of the Executive Order, and, in many cases, made
14There are many more. See, e.g., Br. of The Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center as Amicus Curiae in Supp. of Pls.’ Mot. for TRO, ECF No. 204, at 19-20 (“It’s not unconstitutional keeping people out, frankly, and until we get a hold of what’s going on. And then if you look at Franklin Roosevelt, a respected president, highly respected. Take a look at Presidential proclamations back a long time ago, 2525, 2526, and 2527 what he was doing with Germans, Italians, and Japanese because he had to do it. Because look we are at war with radical Islam.”)
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 35 of 43 PageID #: 4390
by the Executive himself, betray the Executive Order’s stated secular purpose. Any
reasonable, objective observer would conclude, as does the Court for purposes of the
instant Motion for TRO, that the stated secular purpose of the Executive Order is, at
the very least, “secondary to a religious objective” of temporarily suspending the
entry of Muslims. See McCreary, 545 U.S. at 864.15
To emphasize these points, Plaintiffs assert that the stated national security
reasons for the Executive Order are pretextual. Two examples of such pretext
include the security rationales set forth in Section 1(h):
“[I]n January 2013, two Iraqi nationals admitted to the United States as refugees in 2009 were sentenced to 40 years and to life in prison, respectively, for multiple terrorism-related offenses.” [Exec. Order] § 1(h). “And in October 2014, a native of Somalia who had been brought to the United States as a child refugee and later became a naturalized United States citizen was
(quoting Michael Barbaro and Alan Rappeport, In Testy Exchange, Donald Trump Interrupts and ‘Morning Joe’ Cuts to Commercial, New York Times (Dec. 8, 2015), available at https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/08/in-testy-exchange-donaldtrump-interrupts-and-morning-joe-cuts-to-commercial/)); Br. of Muslim Advocates et al. as Amici Curiae in Supp. of Pls.' Mot. for TRO, ECF No. 198, at 10-11 (“On June 13, 2016, after the attack on a nightclub in Orlando, Florida, Mr. Trump said in a speech: ‘I called for a ban after San Bernardino, and was met with great scorn and anger, but now many are saying I was right to do so.’ Mr. Trump then specified that the Muslim ban would be ‘temporary,’ ‘and apply to certain ‘areas of the world when [sic] there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe or our allies, until we understand how to end these threats.’”) (quoting Transcript: Donald Trump’s national security speech, available at http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/ transcript-donald-trump-national-security-speech-22427). 15This Court is not the first to examine these issues. In Aziz v. Trump, United States District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema determined that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their Establishment Clause claim as it related to Executive Order No. 13,769. Accordingly, Judge Brinkema granted the Commonwealth of Virginia’s motion for preliminary injunction. Aziz v. Trump, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2017 WL 580855, at *7–*10 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 36 of 43 PageID #: 4391
sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction[.]” Id. Iraq is no longer included in the ambit of the travel ban, id., and the Order states that a waiver could be granted for a foreign national that is a “young child.” Id. § 3(c)(v).
TRO Mem. 13. Other indicia of pretext asserted by Plaintiffs include the delayed
timing of the Executive Order, which detracts from the national security urgency
claimed by the Administration, and the Executive Order’s focus on nationality,
which could have the paradoxical effect of “bar[ring] entry by a Syrian national who
has lived in Switzerland for decades, but not a Swiss national who has immigrated to
Syria during its civil war,” revealing a “gross mismatch between the [Executive]
Order’s ostensible purpose and its implementation and effects.” Pls.’ Reply 20
(citation omitted).
While these additional assertions certainly call the motivations behind the
Executive Order into greater question,16 they are not necessary to the Court’s
Establishment Clause determination. See Aziz, 2017 WL 580855, at *8 (the
Establishment Clause concerns addressed by the district court’s order “do not
involve an assessment of the merits of the president’s national security judgment.
Instead, the question is whether [Executive Order No. 13,769] was animated by
16See also Br. of T.A., a U.S. Resident of Yemeni Descent, as Amicus Curiae in Supp. of Pls.’ Mot. for TRO, ECF No. 200, at 15-25 (detailing evidence contrary to the Executive Order’s national security justifications).
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 37 of 43 PageID #: 4392
conditions.” McCreary, 545 U.S. at 874.17 The Court recognizes that “purpose
needs to be taken seriously under the Establishment Clause and needs to be
understood in light of context; an implausible claim that governmental purpose has
changed should not carry the day in a court of law any more than in a head with
common sense.” Id. Yet, context may change during the course of litigation, and
the Court is prepared to respond accordingly.
Last, the Court emphasizes that its preliminary assessment rests on the
peculiar circumstances and specific historical record present here. Cf. Aziz, 2017
WL 580855, at *9 (“The Court’s conclusion rests on the highly particular ‘sequence
of events’ leading to this specific [Executive Order No. 13,769] and the dearth of
evidence indicating a national security purpose. The evidence in this record
focuses on the president’s statements about a ‘Muslim ban’ and the link Giuliani
17The Tenth Circuit asked: “What would be enough to meet this standard?”
The case law does not yield a ready answer. But from the above principles we conclude that a government cure should be (1) purposeful, (2) public, and (3) at least as persuasive as the initial endorsement of religion. It should be purposeful enough for an objective observer to know, unequivocally, that the government does not endorse religion. It should be public enough so that people need not burrow into a difficult-to-access legislative record for evidence to assure themselves that the government is not endorsing a religious view. And it should be persuasive enough to countermand the preexisting message of religious endorsement.
Felix, 841 F.3d 863–64.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 219 Filed 03/15/17 Page 39 of 43 PageID #: 4394
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants – Appellants.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai‘i
(1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC)
EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME 2
JEFFREY B. WALL Acting Solicitor General
EDWIN S. KNEEDLER
Deputy Solicitor General
CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General
ELIOT ENOKI Acting United States Attorney
AUGUST E. FLENTJE Special Counsel to the Assistant Attorney
General
DOUGLAS N. LETTER SHARON SWINGLE H. THOMAS BYRON III LOWELL V. STURGILL JR. ANNE MURPHY
Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7241 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20530 (202) 353-2689
Executive Order 13780, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States” (Mar. 6, 2017) reprinted in 82 Fed. Reg. 13209 (Mar. 9, 2017) ........................................... 68 Notice of Appeal Docket Entry 271 ........................................................................................... 79 Letter from Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions III and Secretary of Homeland Security John Francis Kelly to President Donald J. Trump (Mar. 6, 2017) Docket Entry 145, Exhibit A ......................................................................... 83 U.S. Department of State, Executive Order on Visas (Mar. 6. 2017) Docket Entry 145, Exhibit B ......................................................................... 85 Declaration of Neal K. Katyal in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Mar. 8, 2017) Docket Entry 66 ............................................................................................. 88 Declaration of Ismail Elshikh, Ph.D. Exhibit A ............................................................................................. 92 Supplemental Declaration of George Szigeti Exhibit B-1 .......................................................................................... 97 Original Declaration of George Szigeti Exhibit B-2 ........................................................................................ 101 Supplemental Declaration of Luis P. Salaveria Exhibit C-1 ........................................................................................ 106 Original Declaration of Luis P. Salaveria Exhibit C-2 ........................................................................................ 111 Supplemental Declaration of Risa E. Dickson Exhibit D-1 ........................................................................................ 117
Original Declaration of Risa E. Dickson Exhibit D-2 ........................................................................................ 124 Declaration of Hakim Ounsafi Exhibit E ............................................................................................ 129 Second Amended Complaint (Mar. 8, 2017) Docket Entry 64 ........................................................................................... 135 District Court Docket ............................................................................................. 175
Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nation-ality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the Nation from terrorist activities by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy and Purpose. (a) It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks, including those committed by foreign nationals. The screening and vetting protocols and procedures associ-ated with the visa-issuance process and the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) play a crucial role in detecting foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts of terrorism and in preventing those individuals from entering the United States. It is therefore the policy of the United States to improve the screening and vetting protocols and proce-dures associated with the visa-issuance process and the USRAP.
(b) On January 27, 2017, to implement this policy, I issued Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States).
(i) Among other actions, Executive Order 13769 suspended for 90 days the entry of certain aliens from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. These are countries that had already been identified as presenting heightened concerns about terrorism and travel to the United States. Specifically, the suspension applied to countries referred to in, or designated under, section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), in which Congress restricted use of the Visa Waiver Program for nationals of, and aliens recently present in, (A) Iraq or Syria, (B) any country designated by the Secretary of State as a state sponsor of terrorism (currently Iran, Syria, and Sudan), and (C) any other country designated as a country of concern by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence. In 2016, the Secretary of Homeland Security designated Libya, Somalia, and Yemen as additional countries of concern for travel purposes, based on consideration of three statutory factors related to terrorism and national security: ‘‘(I) whether the presence of an alien in the country or area increases the likelihood that the alien is a credible threat to the national security of the United States; (II) whether a foreign terrorist organization has a significant presence in the country or area; and (III) whether the country or area is a safe haven for terrorists.’’ 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12)(D)(ii). Additionally, Members of Congress have expressed con-cerns about screening and vetting procedures following recent terrorist attacks in this country and in Europe.
(ii) In ordering the temporary suspension of entry described in subsection (b)(i) of this section, I exercised my authority under Article II of the Constitution and under section 212(f) of the INA, which provides in relevant part: ‘‘Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13210 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
8 U.S.C. 1182(f). Under these authorities, I determined that, for a brief period of 90 days, while existing screening and vetting procedures were under review, the entry into the United States of certain aliens from the seven identified countries—each afflicted by terrorism in a manner that compromised the ability of the United States to rely on normal decision-making procedures about travel to the United States—would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. Nonetheless, I permitted the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to grant case-by-case waivers when they determined that it was in the national interest to do so.
(iii) Executive Order 13769 also suspended the USRAP for 120 days. Terrorist groups have sought to infiltrate several nations through refugee programs. Accordingly, I temporarily suspended the USRAP pending a review of our procedures for screening and vetting refugees. Nonetheless, I permitted the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to jointly grant case-by-case waivers when they determined that it was in the national interest to do so.
(iv) Executive Order 13769 did not provide a basis for discriminating for or against members of any particular religion. While that order allowed for prioritization of refugee claims from members of persecuted religious minority groups, that priority applied to refugees from every nation, includ-ing those in which Islam is a minority religion, and it applied to minority sects within a religion. That order was not motivated by animus toward any religion, but was instead intended to protect the ability of religious minorities—whoever they are and wherever they reside—to avail them-selves of the USRAP in light of their particular challenges and cir-cumstances. (c) The implementation of Executive Order 13769 has been delayed by
litigation. Most significantly, enforcement of critical provisions of that order has been temporarily halted by court orders that apply nationwide and extend even to foreign nationals with no prior or substantial connection to the United States. On February 9, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined to stay or narrow one such order pending the outcome of further judicial proceedings, while noting that the ‘‘political branches are far better equipped to make appropriate distinctions’’ about who should be covered by a suspension of entry or of refugee admis-sions.
(d) Nationals from the countries previously identified under section 217(a)(12) of the INA warrant additional scrutiny in connection with our immigration policies because the conditions in these countries present height-ened threats. Each of these countries is a state sponsor of terrorism, has been significantly compromised by terrorist organizations, or contains active conflict zones. Any of these circumstances diminishes the foreign govern-ment’s willingness or ability to share or validate important information about individuals seeking to travel to the United States. Moreover, the signifi-cant presence in each of these countries of terrorist organizations, their members, and others exposed to those organizations increases the chance that conditions will be exploited to enable terrorist operatives or sympathizers to travel to the United States. Finally, once foreign nationals from these countries are admitted to the United States, it is often difficult to remove them, because many of these countries typically delay issuing, or refuse to issue, travel documents.
(e) The following are brief descriptions, taken in part from the Department of State’s Country Reports on Terrorism 2015 (June 2016), of some of the conditions in six of the previously designated countries that demonstrate why their nationals continue to present heightened risks to the security of the United States:
(i) Iran. Iran has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and continues to support various terrorist groups, including Hizballah, Hamas, and terrorist groups in Iraq. Iran has also been linked to support
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13211 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
for al-Qa’ida and has permitted al-Qa’ida to transport funds and fighters through Iran to Syria and South Asia. Iran does not cooperate with the United States in counterterrorism efforts.
(ii) Libya. Libya is an active combat zone, with hostilities between the internationally recognized government and its rivals. In many parts of the country, security and law enforcement functions are provided by armed militias rather than state institutions. Violent extremist groups, including the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), have exploited these conditions to expand their presence in the country. The Libyan government provides some cooperation with the United States’ counterterrorism efforts, but it is unable to secure thousands of miles of its land and maritime borders, enabling the illicit flow of weapons, migrants, and foreign terrorist fighters. The United States Embassy in Libya suspended its operations in 2014.
(iii) Somalia. Portions of Somalia have been terrorist safe havens. Al- Shabaab, an al-Qa’ida-affiliated terrorist group, has operated in the country for years and continues to plan and mount operations within Somalia and in neighboring countries. Somalia has porous borders, and most coun-tries do not recognize Somali identity documents. The Somali government cooperates with the United States in some counterterrorism operations but does not have the capacity to sustain military pressure on or to investigate suspected terrorists.
(iv) Sudan. Sudan has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1993 because of its support for international terrorist groups, includ-ing Hizballah and Hamas. Historically, Sudan provided safe havens for al-Qa’ida and other terrorist groups to meet and train. Although Sudan’s support to al-Qa’ida has ceased and it provides some cooperation with the United States’ counterterrorism efforts, elements of core al-Qa’ida and ISIS-linked terrorist groups remain active in the country.
(v) Syria. Syria has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1979. The Syrian government is engaged in an ongoing military conflict against ISIS and others for control of portions of the country. At the same time, Syria continues to support other terrorist groups. It has allowed or encouraged extremists to pass through its territory to enter Iraq. ISIS continues to attract foreign fighters to Syria and to use its base in Syria to plot or encourage attacks around the globe, including in the United States. The United States Embassy in Syria suspended its operations in 2012. Syria does not cooperate with the United States’ counterterrorism efforts.
(vi) Yemen. Yemen is the site of an ongoing conflict between the incumbent government and the Houthi-led opposition. Both ISIS and a second group, al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), have exploited this conflict to expand their presence in Yemen and to carry out hundreds of attacks. Weapons and other materials smuggled across Yemen’s porous borders are used to finance AQAP and other terrorist activities. In 2015, the United States Embassy in Yemen suspended its operations, and embassy staff were relocated out of the country. Yemen has been supportive of, but has not been able to cooperate fully with, the United States in counter-terrorism efforts. (f) In light of the conditions in these six countries, until the assessment
of current screening and vetting procedures required by section 2 of this order is completed, the risk of erroneously permitting entry of a national of one of these countries who intends to commit terrorist acts or otherwise harm the national security of the United States is unacceptably high. Accord-ingly, while that assessment is ongoing, I am imposing a temporary pause on the entry of nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, subject to categorical exceptions and case-by-case waivers, as de-scribed in section 3 of this order.
(g) Iraq presents a special case. Portions of Iraq remain active combat zones. Since 2014, ISIS has had dominant influence over significant territory in northern and central Iraq. Although that influence has been significantly
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13212 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
reduced due to the efforts and sacrifices of the Iraqi government and armed forces, working along with a United States-led coalition, the ongoing conflict has impacted the Iraqi government’s capacity to secure its borders and to identify fraudulent travel documents. Nevertheless, the close cooperative relationship between the United States and the democratically elected Iraqi government, the strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the signifi-cant presence of United States forces in Iraq, and Iraq’s commitment to combat ISIS justify different treatment for Iraq. In particular, those Iraqi government forces that have fought to regain more than half of the territory previously dominated by ISIS have shown steadfast determination and earned enduring respect as they battle an armed group that is the common enemy of Iraq and the United States. In addition, since Executive Order 13769 was issued, the Iraqi government has expressly undertaken steps to enhance travel documentation, information sharing, and the return of Iraqi nationals subject to final orders of removal. Decisions about issuance of visas or granting admission to Iraqi nationals should be subjected to additional scru-tiny to determine if applicants have connections with ISIS or other terrorist organizations, or otherwise pose a risk to either national security or public safety.
(h) Recent history shows that some of those who have entered the United States through our immigration system have proved to be threats to our national security. Since 2001, hundreds of persons born abroad have been convicted of terrorism-related crimes in the United States. They have in-cluded not just persons who came here legally on visas but also individuals who first entered the country as refugees. For example, in January 2013, two Iraqi nationals admitted to the United States as refugees in 2009 were sentenced to 40 years and to life in prison, respectively, for multiple ter-rorism-related offenses. And in October 2014, a native of Somalia who had been brought to the United States as a child refugee and later became a naturalized United States citizen was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction as part of a plot to detonate a bomb at a crowded Christmas-tree-lighting ceremony in Portland, Oregon. The Attorney General has reported to me that more than 300 persons who entered the United States as refugees are currently the subjects of counterterrorism investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(i) Given the foregoing, the entry into the United States of foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts of terrorism remains a matter of grave concern. In light of the Ninth Circuit’s observation that the political branches are better suited to determine the appropriate scope of any suspen-sions than are the courts, and in order to avoid spending additional time pursuing litigation, I am revoking Executive Order 13769 and replacing it with this order, which expressly excludes from the suspensions categories of aliens that have prompted judicial concerns and which clarifies or refines the approach to certain other issues or categories of affected aliens. Sec. 2. Temporary Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Particular Concern During Review Period. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall conduct a worldwide review to identify whether, and if so what, additional information will be needed from each foreign country to adjudicate an application by a national of that country for a visa, admis-sion, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual is not a security or public-safety threat. The Secretary of Homeland Security may conclude that certain information is needed from particular countries even if it is not needed from every country.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President a report on the results of the worldwide review described in subsection (a) of this section, including the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determina-tion of the information needed from each country for adjudications and a list of countries that do not provide adequate information, within 20 days of the effective date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13213 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence.
(c) To temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies during the review period described in subsection (a) of this section, to ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening and vetting of foreign nationals, to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists, and in light of the national security concerns referenced in section 1 of this order, I hereby proclaim, pursuant to sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), that the unrestricted entry into the United States of nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. I therefore direct that the entry into the United States of nationals of those six countries be suspended for 90 days from the effective date of this order, subject to the limitations, waivers, and exceptions set forth in sections 3 and 12 of this order.
(d) Upon submission of the report described in subsection (b) of this section regarding the information needed from each country for adjudications, the Secretary of State shall request that all foreign governments that do not supply such information regarding their nationals begin providing it within 50 days of notification.
(e) After the period described in subsection (d) of this section expires, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, shall submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion in a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of appropriate categories of foreign nationals of countries that have not provided the information requested until they do so or until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that the country has an adequate plan to do so, or has adequately shared information through other means. The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security may also submit to the President the names of addi-tional countries for which any of them recommends other lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States.
(f) At any point after the submission of the list described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, may submit to the President the names of any additional countries recommended for similar treatment, as well as the names of any countries that they recommend should be removed from the scope of a proclamation described in subsection (e) of this section.
(g) The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President a joint report on the progress in implementing this order within 60 days of the effective date of this order, a second report within 90 days of the effective date of this order, a third report within 120 days of the effective date of this order, and a fourth report within 150 days of the effective date of this order. Sec. 3. Scope and Implementation of Suspension.
(a) Scope. Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection (b) of this section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who:
(i) are outside the United States on the effective date of this order;
(ii) did not have a valid visa at 5:00 p.m., eastern standard time on January 27, 2017; and
(iii) do not have a valid visa on the effective date of this order. (b) Exceptions. The suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this
order shall not apply to: (i) any lawful permanent resident of the United States;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13214 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
(ii) any foreign national who is admitted to or paroled into the United States on or after the effective date of this order;
(iii) any foreign national who has a document other than a visa, valid on the effective date of this order or issued on any date thereafter, that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission, such as an advance parole document;
(iv) any dual national of a country designated under section 2 of this order when the individual is traveling on a passport issued by a non- designated country;
(v) any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C–2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G–1, G–2, G–3, or G–4 visa; or
(vi) any foreign national who has been granted asylum; any refugee who has already been admitted to the United States; or any individual who has been granted withholding of removal, advance parole, or protection under the Convention Against Torture. (c) Waivers. Notwithstanding the suspension of entry pursuant to section
2 of this order, a consular officer, or, as appropriate, the Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Commissioner’s delegee, may, in the consular officer’s or the CBP official’s discretion, decide on a case-by-case basis to authorize the issuance of a visa to, or to permit the entry of, a foreign national for whom entry is otherwise suspended if the foreign national has demonstrated to the officer’s satisfaction that denying entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship, and that his or her entry would not pose a threat to national security and would be in the national interest. Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, any waiver issued by a consular officer as part of the visa issuance process will be effective both for the issuance of a visa and any subsequent entry on that visa, but will leave all other requirements for admission or entry unchanged. Case-by-case waivers could be appropriate in circumstances such as the following:
(i) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity, is outside the United States on the effective date of this order, seeks to reenter the United States to resume that activity, and the denial of reentry during the suspension period would impair that activity;
(ii) the foreign national has previously established significant contacts with the United States but is outside the United States on the effective date of this order for work, study, or other lawful activity;
(iii) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant business or professional obligations and the denial of entry during the suspension period would impair those obligations;
(iv) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside with a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admit-ted on a valid nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship;
(v) the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;
(vi) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United States Government (or is an eligible dependent of such an employee) and the employee can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government;
(vii) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government, or traveling
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13215 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not des-ignated under the IOIA;
(viii) the foreign national is a landed Canadian immigrant who applies for a visa at a location within Canada; or
(ix) the foreign national is traveling as a United States Government-spon-sored exchange visitor.
Sec. 4. Additional Inquiries Related to Nationals of Iraq. An application by any Iraqi national for a visa, admission, or other immigration benefit should be subjected to thorough review, including, as appropriate, consulta-tion with a designee of the Secretary of Defense and use of the additional information that has been obtained in the context of the close U.S.-Iraqi security partnership, since Executive Order 13769 was issued, concerning individuals suspected of ties to ISIS or other terrorist organizations and individuals coming from territories controlled or formerly controlled by ISIS. Such review shall include consideration of whether the applicant has connections with ISIS or other terrorist organizations or with territory that is or has been under the dominant influence of ISIS, as well as any other information bearing on whether the applicant may be a threat to commit acts of terrorism or otherwise threaten the national security or public safety of the United States.
Sec. 5. Implementing Uniform Screening and Vetting Standards for All Immi-gration Programs. (a) The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Sec-retary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall implement a program, as part of the process for adjudications, to identify individuals who seek to enter the United States on a fraudulent basis, who support terrorism, violent extremism, acts of violence toward any group or class of people within the United States, or who present a risk of causing harm subsequent to their entry. This program shall include the development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures, such as in-person interviews; a database of identity documents proffered by applicants to ensure that duplicate documents are not used by multiple applicants; amended application forms that include questions aimed at identi-fying fraudulent answers and malicious intent; a mechanism to ensure that applicants are who they claim to be; a mechanism to assess whether appli-cants may commit, aid, or support any kind of violent, criminal, or terrorist acts after entering the United States; and any other appropriate means for ensuring the proper collection of all information necessary for a rigorous evaluation of all grounds of inadmissibility or grounds for the denial of other immigration benefits.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of the program described in subsection (a) of this section within 60 days of the effective date of this order, a second report within 100 days of the effective date of this order, and a third report within 200 days of the effective date of this order. Sec. 6. Realignment of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for Fiscal Year 2017. (a) The Secretary of State shall suspend travel of refugees into the United States under the USRAP, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall suspend decisions on applications for refugee status, for 120 days after the effective date of this order, subject to waivers pursuant to subsection (c) of this section. During the 120-day period, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall review the USRAP application and adjudication processes to determine what additional procedures should be used to ensure that individuals seeking admission as refugees do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States, and shall implement such additional procedures. The suspension described in this subsection shall not apply to refugee applicants who, before the effective date of this order, have been formally scheduled for transit by the Department of State. The Secretary of State shall resume travel of refugees into the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13216 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
United States under the USRAP 120 days after the effective date of this order, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall resume making decisions on applications for refugee status only for stateless persons and nationals of countries for which the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence have jointly determined that the additional procedures implemented pursuant to this subsection are adequate to ensure the security and welfare of the United States.
(b) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any entries in excess of that number until such time as I determine that additional entries would be in the national interest.
(c) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to sub-section (a) of this section, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Home-land Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the entry of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States, including in circumstances such as the fol-lowing: the individual’s entry would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexisting international agreement or arrangement, or the denial of entry would cause undue hardship.
(d) It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdic-tions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees. To that end, the Secretary of State shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdic-tions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the place-ment or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement. Sec. 7. Rescission of Exercise of Authority Relating to the Terrorism Grounds of Inadmissibility. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Attorney General, consider rescinding the exercises of authority permitted by section 212(d)(3)(B) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(3)(B), relating to the terrorism grounds of inadmissibility, as well as any related implementing directives or guidance.
Sec. 8. Expedited Completion of the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall expedite the completion and implementation of a biometric entry-exit tracking system for in-scope trav-elers to the United States, as recommended by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President periodic reports on the progress of the directive set forth in subsection (a) of this section. The initial report shall be submitted within 100 days of the effective date of this order, a second report shall be submitted within 200 days of the effective date of this order, and a third report shall be submitted within 365 days of the effective date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit further reports every 180 days thereafter until the system is fully deployed and operational. Sec. 9. Visa Interview Security. (a) The Secretary of State shall immediately suspend the Visa Interview Waiver Program and ensure compliance with section 222 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1202, which requires that all individuals seeking a nonimmigrant visa undergo an in-person interview, subject to specific statutory exceptions. This suspension shall not apply to any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C–2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G–1, G–2, G–3, or G–4 visa; traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the IOIA; or traveling for purposes of con-ducting meetings or business with the United States Government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13217 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
(b) To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of State shall immediately expand the Consular Fellows Program, including by substantially increasing the number of Fel-lows, lengthening or making permanent the period of service, and making language training at the Foreign Service Institute available to Fellows for assignment to posts outside of their area of core linguistic ability, to ensure that nonimmigrant visa-interview wait times are not unduly affected. Sec. 10. Visa Validity Reciprocity. The Secretary of State shall review all nonimmigrant visa reciprocity agreements and arrangements to ensure that they are, with respect to each visa classification, truly reciprocal insofar as practicable with respect to validity period and fees, as required by sections 221(c) and 281 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1201(c) and 1351, and other treatment. If another country does not treat United States nationals seeking non-immigrant visas in a truly reciprocal manner, the Secretary of State shall adjust the visa validity period, fee schedule, or other treatment to match the treatment of United States nationals by that foreign country, to the extent practicable.
Sec. 11. Transparency and Data Collection. (a) To be more transparent with the American people and to implement more effectively policies and practices that serve the national interest, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall, consistent with applicable law and national security, collect and make publicly available the following information:
(i) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been charged with terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism- related activity, affiliation with or provision of material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national-security-related rea-sons;
(ii) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been radicalized after entry into the United States and who have engaged in terrorism-related acts, or who have provided material support to terrorism-related organizations in countries that pose a threat to the United States;
(iii) information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women, including so-called ‘‘honor killings,’’ in the United States by foreign nationals; and
(iv) any other information relevant to public safety and security as deter-mined by the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General, including information on the immigration status of foreign nationals charged with major offenses. (b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall release the initial report
under subsection (a) of this section within 180 days of the effective date of this order and shall include information for the period from September 11, 2001, until the date of the initial report. Subsequent reports shall be issued every 180 days thereafter and reflect the period since the previous report. Sec. 12. Enforcement. (a) The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Home-land Security shall consult with appropriate domestic and international partners, including countries and organizations, to ensure efficient, effective, and appropriate implementation of the actions directed in this order.
(b) In implementing this order, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including, as appropriate, those providing an opportunity for individuals to claim a fear of persecution or torture, such as the credible fear determina-tion for aliens covered by section 235(b)(1)(A) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13218 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
(c) No immigrant or nonimmigrant visa issued before the effective date of this order shall be revoked pursuant to this order.
(d) Any individual whose visa was marked revoked or marked canceled as a result of Executive Order 13769 shall be entitled to a travel document confirming that the individual is permitted to travel to the United States and seek entry. Any prior cancellation or revocation of a visa that was solely pursuant to Executive Order 13769 shall not be the basis of inadmis-sibility for any future determination about entry or admissibility.
(e) This order shall not apply to an individual who has been granted asylum, to a refugee who has already been admitted to the United States, or to an individual granted withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture. Nothing in this order shall be construed to limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture, consistent with the laws of the United States. Sec. 13. Revocation. Executive Order 13769 of January 27, 2017, is revoked as of the effective date of this order.
Sec. 14. Effective Date. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., eastern daylight time on March 16, 2017.
Sec. 15. Severability. (a) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
(b) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the lack of certain procedural requirements, the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements. Sec. 16. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
subject to the availability of appropriations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0asab
13219 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 45 / Thursday, March 9, 2017 / Presidential Documents
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
THE WHITE HOUSE, March 6, 2017.
[FR Doc. 2017–04837
Filed 3–8–17; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295–F7–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Mar 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09MRE0.SGM 09MRE0 Tru
JEFFREY B. WALL Acting Solicitor General CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General ELLIOT ENOKI (No. 1528) Acting United States Attorney EDRIC M. CHING (No. 6697) Assistant United States Attorney JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Branch Director BRAD P. ROSENBERG (DC Bar No. 467513) MICHELLE R. BENNETT (CO Bar No. 37050) DANIEL SCHWEI (NY Bar) Trial Attorneys United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 514-3374; Fax: (202) 616-8460 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAI’I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Judge: Hon. Derrick K. Watson
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 271 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 5187
Dated: March 30, 2017 Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY B. WALL Acting Solicitor General CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General ELLIOT ENOKI (No. 1528)
Acting United States Attorney EDRIC M. CHING (No. 6697) Assistant United States Attorney JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch /s/ Brad P. Rosenberg BRAD P. ROSENBERG (DC Bar. No. 467513) MICHELLE R. BENNETT (CO Bar. No. 37050) DANIEL SCHWEI (NY Bar) Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 514-3374 Fax: (202) 616-8460 E-mail: [email protected]
Attorneys for Defendants
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 271 Filed 03/30/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 5189
Date: March 30, 2017 /s/ Brad P. Rosenberg Brad P. Rosenberg Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Tel: (202) 514-3374 Fax: (202) 616-8460 E-mail: [email protected]
Attorney for Defendants
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 271 Filed 03/30/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 5190
President Donald J. Trump The White House Washington D.C .. 20500
Dear Mr. President,
March 6, 2017
As Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security, \Ve are concerned about weaknesses in our immigration system that pose a risk to our Nation's security. Our concerns are particularl y acute as we evaluate certain countries that are unable or unwilling to provide the United States with adequate information about their nationals, as well as individuals from nations that have been designated as "state sponsors of terrorism," and with which we have no significant diplomatic presence. We therefore urge you to take measures- pursuant to your inherent authority under the Constitution and as authorized by Congress-to diminish those risks by directing a temporary pause in entry from these countries.
Since the devastating attacks of September I I. 200 I, a substantial majority of those convicted in U.S. courts for international terrorism-related activities were foreign-born. Moreover, senior government officials have expressed concerns that foreign nationals who seek to aid, support, or commit acts of terrorism will seek to infi ltrate the United States through our immigration benefits programs such as the Refugee Admissions Program. At present, more than 300 persons who came to the United States as refugees are under f-BI investigation for potential terrorismrelated activities. There are currently approx imately I 000 pending domestic terrorism-related investigations, and it is believed that a majority of those subjects are inspired, at least in part, by ISIS.
We expend enormous manpower and resources investigating terrorism-related activities of foreign nationals admitted to the United States. as well as extremists within the United States inspired by terrorist organizations such as ISIS and core al-Qa' ida, which have strongholds in certain areas of these countries, and which use widespread and broad-based social-media strategies for recruiting. Preventing and responding to terrorism at home encompasses thousands of national security personnel across the federal government-in effect, we admit individuals at risk for terrorism and then try to identify and stop them from carrying out their terrorist
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 145-1 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2330
activities. This places unacceptable stress on our law enforcement resources, which could be better spent on other efforts to weaken those terrorist organizations, protect the homeland, and safeguard our national security.
Although the convictions and investigations involve individuals from countries around the world, we have particular concerns about our current screening and vetting processes for nationals of certain countries that are either state sponsors of terrorism, or that have active conflict zones in which the central government has lost control of territory to terrorists or terrorist organizations, such as ISIS, core al-Qa'ida, and their regional affiliates. This increases the risk that nationals of these countries (or those purporting to be nationals) may be members of terrorist or extremist groups, or may have been radicalized by hostile governments or terrorist organizations.
This danger to our national security is heightened by the fact that effective collaboration on counter-terrorism, including in the visa issuance and refugee vetting processes, requires adequate information sharing. To the extent a government is a state sponsor of terrorism and hostile to the United States, or lacks control over territory, its passport issuances, and thus over the records of its citizens in such territory, there is a greater risk that the United States will not have access to necessary records to be able to verify important information about individuals seeking to travel from that country to the United States. Furthermore, based on DHS data and the experience of its operators, nationals from these countries are more likely to overstay their visas and are harder to remove to their home countries.
The Executive Branch, under your leadership, should complete a thorough and fresh review of the particular risks to our Nation's security from our immigration system. Therefore, we believe that it is imperative that we have a temporary pause on the entry of nationals from certain countries to allow this review to take place-a temporary pause that will immediately diminish the risk we face from application of our current vetting and screening programs for individuals seeking entry to the United States from these countries.
We stand prepared to take whatever steps are necessary to address this situation.
Sincerely,
crerreF.scm B. Sessions III ey General
·~~ l~I ohn Franc s Kelly
Secretary o Homeland Security ,
2
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC Document 145-1 Filed 03/13/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2331
travel.state.gov > Newsroom > Important Announcement
Print Email
Executive Order on Visas
On March 6, 2017, President Trump signed a new Executive Order on Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States which directs us to review current screening procedures, while protecting national security – our top priority when issuing visas.
We are working closely with the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice to ensure that we implement the Executive Order in accordance with its terms, in an orderly fashion, and consistent with any applicable court orders, with the objective of maximizing national security.
The Executive Order becomes effective 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2017, providing time to make orderly operational adjustments. We will keep the public informed about changes affecting travelers to the United States.
We do not plan to cancel any previously scheduled visa appointments. After the new Executive Order goes into effect, any individual who believes he or she is eligible for a waiver or exemption should apply for a visa and disclose during the visa interview any information that might qualify the individual for a waiver/exemption. A consular officer will carefully review each case to determine whether the applicant is affected by the Executive Order, and, if so, whether the applicant qualifies.
The Executive Order provides specifically that no visas issued before the effective date of the Executive Order will be revoked pursuant to the Executive Order, and it does not apply to nationals of affected countries who have valid visas on the date it becomes effective.
The order further instructs that any individual whose visa was marked revoked or cancelled solely as a result of the original Executive Order issued on January 27, 2017, (E.O. 13769) will be entitled to a travel document permitting travel to the United States, so that the individual may seek entry. Any individual in this situation who seeks to travel to the United States should contact the closest U.S. embassy or consulate to request a travel document.
· FAQs on the Executive Order - Department of Homeland Security
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does this Order apply to dual nationals?
This Executive Order does not restrict the travel of dual nationals, so long as they are traveling on the passport of an unrestricted country and, if needed, hold a valid U.S. visa.
Our embassies and consulates around the world will process visa applications and issue nonimmigrant and immigrant visas to otherwise eligible visa applicants who apply with a passport from an unrestricted country, even if they hold dual nationality from one of the six restricted countries.
I t t A t •travel.state.gov U.S. Passports &
International Travel Students Abroad U.S. Visa Intercountry Adoption International Parental Child Abduction | Contact Us Find U.S. Embassies
& Consulates
closeAlert Executive Order on Visas - Important Announcement
Q: Does this apply to U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents?
No. As stated in the Order, lawful permanent residents of the United States are not affected by the Executive Order.
Q: Are there special rules for legal residents of Canada?
Legal residents of Canada who hold passports of a restricted country can apply for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa to the United States if the individual presents that passport, and proof of legal resident status, to a consular officer. These applications must be made at a U.S. consular section in Canada. A consular officer will carefully review each case to determine whether the applicant is affected by the E.O. and, if so, whether the case qualifies for a waiver.
Q: Will you process waivers for those affected by the E.O.? How do I qualify for a waiver to be issued a visa?
As specified in the Executive Order, consular officers may issue visas to nationals of countries identified in the E.O. on a case-by-case basis, when they determine: that issuance is in the national interest, the applicant poses no national security threat to the United States, and denial of the visa would cause undue hardship.
An individual who wishes to apply for a waiver should apply for a visa and disclose during the visa interview any information that might qualify the individual for a waiver. A consular officer will review each case to determine if the applicant is affected by the E.O. and, if so, whether the case qualifies for a waiver.
Waiver decisions will be made by the consular officer abroad at the time of adjudication.
Q: I sponsored my family member for an immigrant visa, and his interview appointment is after the effective date of the Order. Will he still be able to receive a visa?
The Executive Order provides several examples of categories of cases that may qualify for a discretionary waiver, to be considered on a case-by-case basis, if in the national interest entry would not threaten national security, and denial would cause undue hardship. Among the examples provided, a foreign national who seeks to enter the United States to reside with a close family member who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) may be considered for a waiver if the denial of entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship.
An individual who wishes to apply for a waiver should apply for a visa and disclose during the visa interview any information that might qualify the individual for a waiver. A consular officer will carefully review each case to determine whether the applicant is affected by the E.O. and, if so, whether the case qualifies for a waiver.
Q: Can those needing urgent medical care in the United States still qualify for a visa?
The Executive Order provides several examples of categories of cases that may qualify for a waiver, to be considered on a case-by-case basis when in the national interest, when entry would not threaten national security, and denial would cause undue hardship. Among the examples provided, a foreign national who seeks to enter the United States for urgent medical care may be considered for a waiver.
An individual who wishes to apply for a waiver should apply for a visa and disclose during the visa interview any information that might qualify the individual for a waiver. A consular officer will carefully review each case to determine whether the applicant is affected by the E.O. and, if so, whether the case qualifies for a waiver.
Q: I’m a student or short-term employee that was temporarily outside of the United States when the Executive Order went into effect. Can I return to school/work?
If you have a valid, unexpired visa, the Executive Order does not apply to your return travel.
If you do not have a valid, unexpired visa, the Executive Order provides several examples of categories of cases that may qualify for a discretionary waiver. These waivers will be considered, on a case-by-case basis, to determine if the traveler’s entry would be in the national interest, would not threaten national security, and if denial would impose undue hardship. Among the examples provided, a foreign national who has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity, who is outside the United States on the effective date of the Order, may be considered for a waiver if they seek to reenter the United States to resume that activity and the denial of reentry during the suspension period would impair the activity.
An individual who wishes to apply for a waiver should apply for a visa and disclose during the visa interview any information that might qualify the individual for a waiver. A consular officer will carefully review each case to determine whether the applicant is affected by the E.O. and, if so, whether the case qualifies for a waiver.
About Us
Newsroom
Reports and Statistics
Legal Considerations
Find a U.S. Embassy or Consulate
Contact Us
Careers
Consular Notification and Access
Dipnote Blog
Facebook
Flickr
@travelgov
Youtube
RSS
STAY CONNECTED
Privacy Copyright & Disclaimer FOIA No FEAR Act Data Office of the Inspector General USA.gov GobiernoUSA.gov
This site is managed by the Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
travel.state.govU.S. Passports & International Travel
Students Abroad U.S. Visa Intercountry AdoptionInternational Parental Child Abduction
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
DECLARATION OF NEAL K. KATYAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
I, NEAL K. KATYAL, hereby state and declare as follows:
1. I am counsel for Plaintiffs, the State of Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh. I
have personal knowledge of and am competent to testify to the truth of the matters
stated herein. This Declaration is submitted in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Temporary Restraining Order (the “Motion”), filed concurrently herewith.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1349
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1353
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAW AI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I and ISMAIL ELSIDKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERJCA,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF GEORGE SZIGETI
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-2 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1358
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF GEORGE SZIGETI
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-3 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1362
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF LUIS P. SALAVERIA
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-4 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1367
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-4 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1368
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HA WAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:l7-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF LUIS P. SALAVERIA
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF LUIS P. SALA VERIA
I, LUIS P. SALA VERIA, do declare and would competently testify as follows.
I. I am the Director of the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic
Development and Tourism (DBEDT). I have held this position since
December 2014. Prior to this position, I served as the State's Deputy
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF LUIS P. SALAVERIA
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-5 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1372
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RISA E. DICKSON
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-6 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1378
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-6 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 1379
IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HA WAI'I
STATE OF HA WAI'I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
V.
I
I I
I Civil Action No. 1: 17-cv-00050-
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity I DKW-KJM as President of the United States; U.S. I
I
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAJ-:ID . . j SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, m his official DECLARATION OF RISA E. capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; DICKSON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as j Secretary of State; and the UNITED ST ATES I OF AMERICA, I
Defendants. J : !
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RISA E. DICKSON
I, Risa E. Dickson, do declare and would competently testify as follows.
1. I am Vice President for Academic Planning and Policy, at the University of
Hawai'i System. I began this role in February 2015. Previously, I worked at
California State University, San Bernardino from 1991-2014. Among the
positions I held there included Associate Provost for Academic Personnel.
As Associate Provost, my office processed and monitored visa for
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF RISA E. DICKSON
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-7 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1385
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM
DECLARATION OF HAKIM OUNSAFI
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-8 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1390
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-8 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1391
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HA WAI'I
STA TE OF HAW AI 'I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
I : I :
i ! : :
I I
I i Civil Action No. ! DKW-KJM j
l: l 7-cv-00050-
SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official DECLARATION OF HAKIM capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; OUANSAFI U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED ST ATES OF AMERICA, I
Defendants. I !
DECLARATION OF HAKIM OUANSAFI
I, HAKIM OUANSAFI, do declare and would competently testify as follows .
I. I am the Chairman of the Muslim Association of Hawaii. I have held this
position for approximately l 5 years. I have been a resident of Hawaii since
1998.
2. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in this declaration.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
Civil No. 17-00050-DKW-KJM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on the dates and by the methods of service noted below,
a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Neal K. Katyal in Support of
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order was served on the following at
their last known addresses:
Served Electronically through CM/ECF on March 8, 2017:
Respectfully submitted, DOUGLAS S. CHIN (Bar No. 6465) Attorney General of the State of Hawai‘i CLYDE J. WADSWORTH (Bar No. 8495) Solicitor General of the State of Hawai‘i DEIRDRE MARIE-IHA (Bar No. 7923) DONNA H. KALAMA (Bar No. 6051) KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY (Bar No. 7813) ROBERT T. NAKATSUJI (Bar No. 6743) Deputy Attorneys General DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I
/s/ Neal K. Katyal NEAL K. KATYAL* COLLEEN ROH SINZDAK* MITCHELL P. REICH* ELIZABETH HAGERTY* THOMAS P. SCHMIDT* SARA SOLOW* ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN* HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP *Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Plaintiff, State of Hawai‘i
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, State of Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 66-9 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1395
1. The State of Hawai‘i (the “State”) brings this action to protect its
residents, its employers, its educational institutions, and its sovereignty against
illegal actions of President Donald J. Trump and the federal government,
specifically: President Trump’s March 6, 2017 Executive Order, “Protecting the
Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States” (the “Executive
Order”).1 Plaintiff Ismail Elshikh, PhD, the Imam of the Muslim Association of
Hawai‘i, joins the State in its challenge because the Executive Order inflicts a
grave injury on Muslims in Hawai‘i, including Dr. Elshikh, his family, and
members of his Mosque.
2. President Trump’s original Executive Order dated January 27, 2017
blocked the entry into the United States, including Hawai‘i, of any person from
seven Muslim-majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and
Yemen.2 His new Executive Order also blocks the entry into the United States,
including Hawai‘i, of nationals from six of the same countries—all except for
Iraq—as long as those individuals do not have a valid U.S. visa as of the effective
date of the Executive Order, or did not have one as of 5:00 p.m. EST on January 27,
2017. In other words, the Executive Order means that no prospective visa holder
from the six designated countries will be able to enter the United States. This
second Executive Order is infected with the same legal problems as the first
Order—undermining bedrock constitutional and statutory guarantees.
3. The Executive Order means that thousands of individuals across the
United States and in Hawai‘i who have immediate family members living in the
1 As of this filing, President Trump’s March 6, 2017 has not yet been published in
the Federal Register. A copy of the Executive Order published on the White
House website is attached as Exhibit 1, and is available at https://goo.gl/rnecqx. 2 See Executive Order No. 13769, 82 Fed. Reg. 8977 (Jan. 27, 2017). A copy of
the first Executive Order is attached as Exhibit 2.
Case 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM Document 64 Filed 03/08/17 Page 3 of 40 PageID #: 850
District of Hawaii (Hawaii)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:17−cv−00050−DKW−KSC
State of Hawaii v. TrumpAssigned to: JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSONReferred to: MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANGCase in other court: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 17−15589Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th &8th Amendment
Date Filed: 02/03/2017Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: OtherJurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
State of Hawaii represented byAlexander BowermanHogan Lovells US LLP1835 Market Street, 29th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103(267) 675−4664Fax: (267) 675−4601Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Clyde J. WadsworthOffice of the Attorney General−HawaiiTax Division425 Queen StHonolulu, HI 96813(808) 524−1800Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Colleen Roh SinzdakHogan Lovells US LLP555 13th Street NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 637−5823Fax: (202) 637−5910Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Deirdre Marie−IhaOffice of the Attorney General−HawaiiTax Division425 Queen StHonolulu, HI 96813586−1292Fax: 586−1239Email: deirdre.marie−[email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Donna H. KalamaState of HawaiiMajor Litigation Unit425 Queen StreetHonolulu, HI 96813587−2995Fax: 587−2999Email: [email protected]
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 1 of 64
Douglas S.G. ChinAttorney General of HawaiiDept of the Attorney General,State of HI425 Queen StreetHonolulu, HI 96813586−1282Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Elizabeth HagertyHogan Lovells US LLP555 Thirteenth Street NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 637−2321Fax: (202) 637−5910Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kimberly T. GuidryOffice of the Attorney General−Hawaii425 Queen StHonolulu, HI 96813586−1360Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Mitchell ReichHogan Lovells US LLP555 13th Street NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 637−5833Fax: (202) 637−5910Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Neal KatyalHogan Lovells US LLP555 Thirteenth Street NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 637−5528Fax: (202) 637−5910Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert T. NakatsujiOffice of the Attorney General−HawaiiTax Division425 Queen StHonolulu, HI 96813(808) 536−1360Fax: (808) 586−1237Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 2 of 64
Sara SolowHogan Lovells US LLP1835 Market Street, 29th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103(267) 675−4654Fax: (267) 675−4601Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Thomas SchmidtHogan Lovells US LLP875 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 918−5547Fax: (212) 918−3100Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Plaintiff
Ismail Elshikh represented byAlexander Bowerman(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Colleen Roh Sinzdak(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Elizabeth Hagerty(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Mitchell Reich(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Neal Katyal(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Sara Solow(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Thomas Schmidt(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICE
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 3 of 64
Donald J. Trumpin his official capacity as President of theUnited States
represented byBrad P. RosenbergU.S. Department of Justice − CivilDivision20 Massachusetts Ave. NWWashington, DC 20530(202) 514−3374Fax: (202) 616−8460Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Chad A. ReadlerU.S. Department of JusticeCivil Division950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Washington, DC 20530(202) 514−7830Fax: (202) 514−8071Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Daniel SchweiU.S. Department of JusticeCivil Division, Federal Programs Branch20 Massachusetts Ave, NWWashington, DC 20530(202) 305−8693Fax: (202) 616−8470Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Edric Ming−Kai ChingOffice of the United States AttorneyPrince Kuhio Federal Building300 Ala Moana Blvd Ste 6100Honolulu, HI 96850541−2850Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Elliot EnokiOffice of the United States AttorneyPrince Kuhio Federal Building300 Ala Moana Blvd Ste 6100Honolulu, HI 96850541−2850Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Florence T. NakakuniOffice of the United States AttorneyPrince Kuhio Federal Building300 Ala Moana Blvd Ste 6100Honolulu, HI 96850541−2850
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 4 of 64
Email: [email protected]: 03/30/2017LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jeffrey B. WallU.S. Department of JusticeOffice Of The Solicitor General950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Washington, DC 20530(202) 514−2201Fax: (202) 305−2452Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Michelle R. BennettU.S. Department of JusticeCivil Division−Federal Programs Branch20 Massachusetts Ave., NWWashington, DC 20001(202) 305−8902Fax: (202) 616−8470Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
U.S. Department of Homeland Security represented byBrad P. Rosenberg(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Chad A. Readler(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Daniel Schwei(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Edric Ming−Kai Ching(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Elliot Enoki(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jeffrey B. Wall(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Michelle R. Bennett(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 5 of 64
Jeffrey B. Wall(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Michelle R. Bennett(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Law ProfessorsAmicus Curiae Law Professors
represented byClaire Loebs DavisLane Powell PC1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4200Seattle, WA 98111−9402(206) 223−7000Fax: (206) 223−7107Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Mark S. DavisDavis Levin Livingston Grande400 Davis Levin Livingston Grande Place851 Fort Street Ste 400Honolulu, HI 96813−4317524−7500Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
International Law Scholars andNongovernmental OrganizationsAmici Curiae
represented byAaron FellmethSandra Day O'Connor College of Law,Arizona State UniveMail Code 9520, 111 E. Taylor StreetPhoenix, AZ 85004−4467(480) 241−8414Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Clare M. HanuszDamon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert1003 Bishop Street, Suite 1600xHonolulu, HI 96813531−8031Fax: 533−2242Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Anti−Defamation League represented byJohn B. HarrisFrankfurt Kurnit Klein &Selz, P.C.488 Madison Avenue, 10th Fl.(212) 980−0120Fax: (212) 593−9175Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 8 of 64
Nicole Y.C. L. AltmanGoodsill Anderson Quinn and Stifel LLP999 Bishop St., Ste 1600Honolulu, HI 96813808−547−5600Fax: 808−547−5880Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Immigration Reform Law Institute25 Massachusetts Ave., NWSuite 335Washington, DC 20001
represented byChristopher J. HajecImmigration Reform Law Institute25 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Suite 335Washington, DC 20001(202) 232 5590Fax: (202) 464−3590Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Denise M. Hevicon841 Bishop StreetSuite 2210Honolulu, HI 96813523−5751Fax: 532−2164Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Roderick and Solange MacArthurJustice Center
represented byAmir H. AliRoderick &Solange MacArthur JusticeCenter718 7th Street NWWashington, DC 20001(202) 869−3434Fax: (202) 869−3435Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
David J. MinkinMcCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnonFive Waterfront Plaza 4th floor500 Ala Moana BlvdHonolulu, HI 96813529−7300Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jessica M. WanMcCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnonFive Waterfront Plaza 4th floor500 Ala Moana BlvdHonolulu, HI 96813(808) 529−7300Fax: (808) 524−8293Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 9 of 64
Lisa W. CataldoMcCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnonFive Waterfront Plaza 4th floor500 Ala Moana BlvdHonolulu, HI 96813529−7300Fax: 808−524−8293Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Jay Hirabayashi represented byJessica M. WeiselAkin Gump Strauss Hauer &Feld LLP1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 600Los Angeles, CA 90067(310) 229−1000Fax: (310) 229−1001Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Louise K.Y. IngAlston Hunt Floyd &Ing1001 Bishop St Ste 1800Honolulu, HI 96813524−1800Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pratik A. ShahAkin Gump Strauss Hauer &Feld LLP1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20036(202) 887−4000Fax: (202) 887−4288Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert A. JohnsonAkin Gump Strauss Hauer &Feld LLP19800 MacArthur Blvd Ste 100One Bryant ParkNew York, NY 10036(212) 872−1000Fax: (212) 872−1002Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Claire Wong BlackAlston Hunt Floyd &IngASB Tower1001 Bishop St Ste 1800Honolulu, HI 96813524−1800Email: [email protected]
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 10 of 64
Claire Wong Black(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
South Asian Bar Association of NorthAmerica (SABA North America)
represented byLouise K.Y. Ing(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Claire Wong Black(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Human Rights First represented byAlan C. TurnerSimpson Thacher &Bartlett LLP425 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017(212) 455−2472Fax: (212) 455−2502Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Harrison J. FrahnSimpson Thacher &Bartlett LLP2475 Hanover StreetPalo Alto, CA 94304(650) 251−5065Fax: (650) 251−5002Email: [email protected] (Inactive)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lisa W. MungerGoodsill Anderson Quinn &Stifel LLLPFirst Hawaiian Center999 Bishop St Ste 1600Honolulu, HI 96813547−5600Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
KIND (Kids in Need of Defense) represented byAlan C. Turner(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Harrison J. Frahn(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lisa W. Munger(See above for address)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 14 of 64
Tahirih Justice Center represented byAlan C. Turner(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Harrison J. Frahn(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lisa W. Munger(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
HIAS represented byG. Eric Brunstad , Jr.Dechert LLP90 State House SquareHartford, CT 06103−3702(860) 524−3999Fax: (860) 524−3930Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lisa W. Munger(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Congregation B'nai Jeshurun represented byThomas BenedictGoodsill Anderson Quinn &Stifel LLLPFirst Hawaiian Center999 Bishop St Ste 1600Honolulu, HI 96813547−5600Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Reverend Curtis W. Hart represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 15 of 64
Rabbi Joel Mosbacher represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Reverend Timothy Tutt represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Joy Levitt represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Sikh Coalition represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Employment Law Alliance represented byAlison M. HamerHirschfeld Kraemer LLP233 Wilshire Boulevard Ste 600Santa Monica, CA 90401(310) 255−0705Fax: (310) 255−−0986Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Anna M. Elento−SneedESInc.Pauahi Tower1003 Bishop St Ste 2750Honolulu, HI 96813808−729−9400Fax: 808−729−9425Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kimberly Ann GreeleyESInc.Pauahi Tower, Suite 27501003 Bishop St.Honolulu, HI 96813(808) 729−9411Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Mary Ellen SimonsonLewis Roca Rothergerber Christie LLP201 E Washington St. Ste 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004(602) 262−5317Fax: (602) 734−3868
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 16 of 64
Natasha J. BakerHirschfeld Kraemer LLP505 Montgomery Street, 13th FloorSan Francisco, HI 94111(415) 835−9000Fax: (415) 834−0443Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
P.K. Runkles−PearsonMiller Nash Graham &Dunn LLP111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400Portland, OR 97204(503) 224−5858Fax: (503) 224−0155Email: p.k.runkles−[email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
International Law Scholars represented byAndrew L. NellisAmericans United for Separation of Churchand State1310 L St. NW, Suite 200Washington, DC 20005(202) 466−3234Fax: (202) 466−3353Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kelly M. PercivalAmericans United for Separation of Churchand State1310 L St. NW, Suite 200Washington, DC 20005(202) 466−3434Fax: (202) 466−3353Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Richard B. KatskeeAmericans United for Separation of Churchand State1310 L St. NW, Suite 200Washington, DC 20005(202) 466−3234Fax: (202) 466−3353Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 17 of 64
Steven D. StraussMelody Parker LawP. O. Box 1615Hilo, HI 96721(808) 969−6684Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
National Asian Pacific American BarAssociation
represented byJames W. KimMcDermott Will &Emery LLP500 North Capitol Street NWWashington, DC 20001(202) 756−8386Fax: (202) 756−8087Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
John S. RheeAlston Hunt Floyd &Ing − HonoluluAmerican Savings Bank Tower1001 Bishop St Ste 1800Honolulu, HI 96813524−1800Fax: 524−4591Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Meredith S.H. HigashiNational Asian Pacific American BarAssociation1612 K Street NW, Suite 510Washington, DC 20006(202) 775−9555Fax: (202) 775−9333Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Navdeep SinghNational Asian Pacific American BarAssociation1612 K Street NW, Suite 510Washington, DC 20006(202) 775−9555Fax: (202) 775−9333Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela W. BunnAlston Hunt Floyd &Ing1001 Bishop St., Ste 1800Honolulu, HI 96813524−1800Fax: 524−4591Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 18 of 64
Rachana A. PathakWhittier Law School3333 Harbor Blvd.Costa Mesa, CA 92626(714) 444−4141 ext 231Fax: (714) 444−1854Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Tina R. MatsuokaNational Asian Pacific American BarAssociation1612 K. St., NW, Ste. 510Washington, DC 20006(202) 775−9555Fax: (202) 775−9333Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche,Episcopal Bishop of New York
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Right Reverend Allen K. Shin,Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Right Reverend Mary D.Glasspool, Bishop Assistant of theEpiscopal Diocese of New York
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Right Reverend Lawrence C.Provenzano, Episcopal Bishop of LongIsland
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Muslim Public Affairs Council represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The Right Reverend Marc HandleyAndrus, Episcopal Bishop of California
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 19 of 64
Congregation Beit Simchat Torah represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Frederick Reeves represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Peretz Wolf−Prusan represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Noa Kushner represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Union Theological Seminary represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi John Rosove represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
United Methodist Women represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi James Ponet represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Hyde Park &Kenwood InterfaithCouncil
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Michael Strassfeld represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Illinois represented byDavid L. FranklinOffice of the Illinois Attorney General100 W. Randolph St., 12th FloorChicago, IL 60601(312) 814−5376Fax: (312) 814−2275Email: [email protected]
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 20 of 64
Duane R. MiyashiroAdams Miyashiro &Krek, LLP900 Fort St Mall, Ste 1700Honolulu, HI 96813(808) 777−2900Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
American Center for Law and Justice represented byRobert K. Matsumoto345 Queen St Ste 701Honolulu, HI 96813585−7244Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Massachusetts Technology LeadershipCouncil, Inc.
represented byBrett R. TobinGoodsill Anderson Quinn &Stifel LLLPFirst Hawaiian Center999 Bishop St Ste 1600Honolulu, HI 96813547−5789Fax: 441−1237Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Christopher E. HartFoley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardBoston, MA 02210(617) 832−1000Fax: (617) 832−7000Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Daniel L. McFaddenFoley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardBoston, MA 02210(617) 832−1000Fax: (617) 832−7000Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Michael B. KeatingFoley Hoag LLP155 Seaport Blvd.Boston, MA 02210−2600(617) 832−1000Fax: (617) 832−7000Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of California represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Connecticut represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Delaware represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Iowa represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Maryland represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Massachusetts represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of New Mexico represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of New York represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEY
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 22 of 64
State of Oregon represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Rhode Island represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Vermont represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
State of Virginia represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The District of Columbia represented byDuane R. Miyashiro(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Muslim Advocates represented byAnton A. WareArnold &Porter Kay Scholer LLPThree Embarcadero Center, 10th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111(415) 471−3100Fax: (415) 471−3400Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Johnathan James SmithMuslim AdvocatesP.O. Box 71080Oakland, CA 94612(415) 692−1484Fax: (415) 765−1774Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Nickolas A. KacprowskiAlston Hunt Floyd &Ing1001 Bishop StreetSuite 1800Honolulu, HI 96813(808) 441−6131Fax: (808) 441−6524Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
American Muslim Health Professionals represented byJohnathan James Smith(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Junaid Sulahry(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Nickolas A. Kacprowski(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Muppies represented byAnton A. Ware(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Johnathan James Smith(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Junaid Sulahry(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Nickolas A. Kacprowski(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
The National Arab American MedicalAssociation
represented byNickolas A. Kacprowski(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 24 of 64
represented byAnton A. Ware(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Johnathan James Smith(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Junaid Sulahry(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Nickolas A. Kacprowski(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Interfaith Coalition represented byKarun TilakCovington &Burling, LLPOne City Center, 850 Tenth Street, NWWashinton, DC 20001−4965(202) 662−6000Fax: (202) 662−6291Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Michael BakerCovington &Burling, LLPOne City Center, 850 Tenth Street, NWWashington, DC 2001−4965(202) 662−6000Fax: (202) 662−6291Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert D. FramCovington &Burling, LLPOne Front Street, 35th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111(415) 591−6000Fax: (415) 519−6091Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
T.A. represented byRegan M. IwaoGoodsill Anderson Quinn &Stifel LLLPFirst Hawaiian Center
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 25 of 64
999 Bishop St Ste 1600Honolulu, HI 96813547−5600Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Richard D. BernsteinWillkie Farr &Gallagher LLP1875 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20006(202) 303−1108Fax: (202) 303−2108Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lynda L. ArakawaGoodsill Anderson Quinn &Stifel LLP999 Bishop Street, Suite 1600Honolulu, HI 96813(808) 547−5635Fax: (808) 441−1250Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Muppies, Inc. represented byNickolas A. Kacprowski(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Southern Poverty Law Center represented byAndrew L. Nellis(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Richard B. Katskee(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
New York University represented byJames B. RogersAlston Hunt Floyd &Ing − HonoluluAmerican Savings Bank Tower1001 Bishop St Ste 1800Honolulu, HI 96813(808) 524−1800Fax: (808) 524−4591Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Seth D. FiurProskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036(212) 969−3000
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 26 of 64
Fax: (212) 969−2900Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven E. ObusProskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036(212) 969−3000Fax: (212) 969−2900Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Terrance J. NolanNew York University70 Washington Square South − 1168New York, NY 10012(212) 998−2257Fax: (212) 995−3048Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Tiffany M. WooProskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036(212) 969−3223Fax: (212) 969−2900Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Claire Wong Black(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
National Council of Churches of Christin the USA
represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
IKAR represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Rabbi Sharon Brous represented byThomas Benedict(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Technology Companies and OtherBusinesses
represented byAndrew J. EhrlichPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &GarrisonLLP
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 27 of 64
1285 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019−6064(212) 373−3166Fax: (212) 492−0166Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Margery S. BronsterBronster Fujichaku Robbins2300 Pauahi Tower1003 Bishop StHonolulu, HI 96813524−5644Fax: 599−1881Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pietro J. SignoracciPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &GarrisonLLP1285 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019−6064(212) 373−3481Fax: (212) 492−0481Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert A. AtkinsPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &GarrisonLLP1285 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019−6064(212) 373−3183Fax: (212) 492−0183Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Melinda M WeaverBronster Fujichaku Robbins1003 Bishop StreetSuite 2300Honolulu, HI 96813(808) 524−5644Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED
Counsel101 Aupuni StreetSuite 325Hilo, HI 96720768−5234Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert M. KohnDepartment of the Corporation Counsel530 South King Street, Room 110Honolulu, Hi 96813768−5129Fax: 768−5105Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
City of Chicago represented byBenna Ruth SolomonCity of Chicago Department of Law30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800Chicago, IL 60602(312) 744−7764Fax: (312) 744−3588Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYPRO HAC VICEATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert M. Kohn(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Amicus
Lamar Christopher Chapman, IIITERMINATED: 03/29/2017
represented byLamar Christopher Chapman, III16900−424FCI LORETTOFEDERAL CORRECTIONALINSTITUTIONInmate Mail/ParcelsP.O. BOX 1000LORETTO, PA 15940814−472−4140PRO SE
Inmate Mail/ParcelsP.O. BOX 1600BUTNER, NC 27509979−775−5681PRO SE
Intervenor
Eric Richard ElesonTERMINATED: 03/21/2017
represented byEric Richard ElesonJ59564Mule Creek State PrisonP. O. Box 409099Ione, CA 95640PRO SE
Intervenor
Joseph CampTERMINATED: 03/22/2017otherMikki the MimeTERMINATED: 03/22/2017also known asJojoTERMINATED: 03/22/2017
represented byJoseph CampP01102062on behalf of Mikki the MimeP. O. Box 16700Golden, CO 80402−6700PRO SE
Date Filed # Docket Text
02/03/2017 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Donald J. Trump (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975−1825544.), filed by State of Hawaii.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11Exhibit 11, # 12 JS 44 − Civil Cover Sheet, # 13 Tillerson Summons, # 14 StateDepartment Summons, # 15 DHS Summons, # 16 Kelly Summons)(Chin, Douglas)(Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Douglas S.G. Chin appearing forPlaintiff State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of TRO, # 2Certificate with Word Count, # 3 Proposed TRO)(Chin, Douglas) (Entered:02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 17−00050DKW−KJM on all further pleadings.(emt, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 4 Summons Issued as to Rex Tillerson, in his capacity as Secretary of State.(emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 5 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of State.(emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security.(emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 7 Summons Issued as to John F. Kelly, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S.Department of Homeland Security.(emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 8 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:30AM on 4/3/2017 beforeMagistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD −Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 2/3/2017.
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 30 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry.
ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT(COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL).THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BESERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 9 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant toRule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures.(Attachments: # 1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service ofSummons, # 2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons)(emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 10 Declaration re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order . (Attachments: # 1Exhibit A − Doe 1, # 2 Exhibit B − Doe 2, # 3 Exhibit C − Doe 3, # 4 Exhibit D −Dickson Declaration, # 5 Exhibit E − Slaveria Declaration, # 6 Exhibit F − SzigetiDeclaration, # 7 Exhibit G − Higashi Declaration, # 8 Exhibit H − ElshikhDeclaration)(Chin, Douglas) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 14 Summons Issued as to United States of America.(emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 15 EX PARTE Motion for In Camera Review of Exhibits A, B, and C to Declarationof Douglas S. Chin in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary RestrainingOrder; Clyde J. Wadsworth appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Clyde J. Wadsworth, # 2 Proposed Order)(Wadsworth, Clyde)(Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Neal Katayal for Plaintiff State ofHawaii, Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975−1825774.Deirdre Marie−Ihaappearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii (Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 17 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO NEALKATYAL re: 16 .Signed by U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on2/3/2017.(afc)
NEAL KATYAL, ESQ. (Law firm: Hogan Lovells US LLP) added as attorney pro hac vice forplaintiff STATE OF HAWAII.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications.(Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 18 EO: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff State of Hawaii's Motion for TemporaryRestraining Order (''TRO''). Dkt. No. 2. The Government shall file a response tothe Motion for TRO by Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:00 noon (HST). The Courtwill hold a hearing on the Motion for TRO on Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at9:30 a.m. (HST). (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tl, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 31 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/03/2017 19 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order.Motion Hearing date has been set for 2/8/2017 at 9:30 AM in Aha Kupono beforeJUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON. (tl, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. (Entered: 02/03/2017)
02/05/2017 20 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Elizabeth M. Hagerty Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1826107.Deirdre Marie−Iha appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/05/2017)
02/06/2017 21 ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [Pro Hac Vice: ElizabethHagerty].Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 2/6/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/06/2017)
02/06/2017 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle R. Bennett on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered:02/06/2017)
02/06/2017 23 Emergency MOTION to Stay re 18 Link,,, Michelle R. Bennett appearing forDefendants John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department ofHomeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States of America(Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Proposed Order)(Bennett, Michelle)(Entered: 02/06/2017)
02/06/2017 24 EO: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay AllDeadlines Pending Resolution of Appellate Proceedings Regarding NationwideInjunction (''Motion to Stay''). Dkt. No. 23. Plaintiff State of Hawaii may file aresponse to the Motion to Stay by no later than Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 9:00a.m. (HST). (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tl, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/06/2017)
02/06/2017 25 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 23 Emergency MOTION to Stay re 18 Link,,,filed by State of Hawaii. (Chin, Douglas) (Entered: 02/06/2017)
02/06/2017 26 Errata re 25 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Emergency Stay.(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/06/2017)
02/07/2017 27 EO: Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay All Deadlines Pending Resolution ofAppellate Proceedings Regarding Nationwide Injunction is hereby GRANTED INPART. Dkt. No. 23 . All pending deadlines and the hearing set for February 8,2017 are VACATED. The matter is stayed as long as the February 3, 2017injunction entered in Washington v. Trump, 2:17−cv−141 (W.D. Wash.), remainsin place, or until further order of this Court. All further relief requested by theEmergency Motion is DENIED. A written order setting forth the Court's reasoningwill follow. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(watson1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 32 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry Modified to create link to motion on 2/7/2017 (ecs, ).
(Entered: 02/07/2017)
02/07/2017 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Edric Ming−Kai Ching on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America. (Ching, Edric) (Entered:02/07/2017)
02/08/2017 29 ORDER GRANTING 15 EX PARTE MOTION FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OFEXHIBITS A, B, AND C TO DECLARATION OF DOUGLAS S. CHIN INSUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAININGORDER. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 2/8/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/08/2017)
02/08/2017 30 MOTION to Partially Lift Stay Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed First Am. Compl., # 2 Exhibit Decl. of ClydeJ. Wadsworth, # 3 Exhibit Proposed Order, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Katyal,Neal) (Entered: 02/08/2017)
02/09/2017 31 EO: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff State of Hawaii's Motion to Partially LiftStay. Dkt. No. 30. The Government may file a response to the State's motion byMonday, February 13, 2017. Thereafter, the Court intends to rule on the motionwithout a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d). IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGEDERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/09/2017)
02/09/2017 32 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY DEADLINES PENDING RESOLUTION OFAPPELLATE PROCEEDINGS REGARDING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 2/9/2017. −− The Emergency Motion to Stay is GRANTED IN PART. This matter is stayed as long as theFebruary 3, 2017 injunction entered in Washington v. Trump remains in full force and effect, oruntil further order of this Court. All further relief requested by the Emergency Motion to Stay isDENIED. Re: 23 Emergency MOTION to Stay Deadlines, 27 EO on Motion to Stay (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/09/2017)
02/10/2017 33 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Schwei on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America. (Schwei, Daniel) (Entered:02/10/2017)
02/13/2017 34 NOTICE of Appearance by Brad P. Rosenberg on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America. (Rosenberg, Brad) (Entered:02/13/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 33 of 64
02/13/2017 35 STATEMENT of No Position re 30 MOTION to Partially Lift Stay filed by JohnF. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security,U.S. Department of State, United States of America. (Rosenberg, Brad) (Entered:02/13/2017)
02/13/2017 36 EO: Upon consideration of the State of Hawaii's Motion to Partially Lift Stay("Motion")(Dkt. No. 30), the Government's Statement of No Position (Dkt. No.35), and good cause appearing therefor, the State's Motion is hereby GRANTED.The State may file (1) its Proposed First Amended Complaint, and (2) theDeclaration of Clyde J. Wadsworth Regarding Exhibit C to Declaration of DouglasS. Chin in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, both inthe form previously submitted to the Court as exhibits to the Motion (see Dkt. Nos.30−1 and 30−2). The State may do so no later than Wednesday, February 15, 2017.The Court's February 9, 2017 stay order (Dkt. No. 32) otherwise remains in place.IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/13/2017)
02/13/2017 37 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief againstAll Defendants, filed by State of Hawaii. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Katyal, Neal) Modified docket text on 2/14/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 02/13/2017)
02/14/2017 38 Declaration of Clyde J. Wadsworth Regarding Exhibit C to Declaration of DouglasS. Chin in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.(Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Wadsworth, Clyde) (Entered:02/14/2017)
02/15/2017 39 Letter from Deidre Marie−Iha, Deputy Attorney to Hon. Derrick K. Watson,2/15/2017. Re: Pending Pro Hac Vice Applications (ecs, ) (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/15/2017 40 EO: The Court hereby lifts the stay in this matter for the limited purpose ofallowing the parties to file Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Notices ofAppearance of Counsel, and/or Applications to Practice, consistent with LocalRules 83.1(d) and (e). The Court's February 9, 2017 stay order (Dkt. No. 32)otherwise remains in place. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/15/2017 41 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for A. Bowerman Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1831293.Deirdre Marie−Iha appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/15/2017 42 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for C. Roh Sinzdak Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1831299.Deirdre Marie−Iha appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/15/2017 43 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for M. Reich Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1831304.Deirdre Marie−Iha appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/15/2017 44 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for S. Solow Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1831306.Deirdre Marie−Iha appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/15/2017 45 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for T. Schmidt Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1831312.Deirdre Marie−Iha appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/15/2017)
02/16/2017 ADVISORY ENTRY re entry docket number 44 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for S.Solow, 45 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for T. Schmidt, 41 MOTION for Pro Hac
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 34 of 64
Vice for A. Bowerman, 43 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for M. Reich, 42 MOTIONfor Pro Hac Vice for C. Roh Sinzdak filed by State of Hawaii was filed incorrectlyin this case with the /s/ of Pro Hac Vice applicants.
Filing party has been contacted and will be filing a "Supplement" to the Motion forPro Hac Vice in which the Declaration of Counsel and the CM/ECF Registrationforms will include the wet signature of the Pro Hac Vice applicants.(ecs, )(Entered: 02/16/2017)
02/17/2017 46 SUPPLEMENT re 41 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for A. Bowerman Filing fee $300, receipt number 0975−1831293. filed by State of Hawaii by State of Hawaii asrequested by clerk. (Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/17/2017)
02/17/2017 47 SUPPLEMENT re 42 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for C. Roh Sinzdak Filing fee $300, receipt number 0975−1831299. filed by State of Hawaii by State of Hawaii asrequested by clerk. (Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/17/2017)
02/17/2017 48 SUPPLEMENT re 43 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for M. Reich Filing fee $ 300,receipt number 0975−1831304. filed by State of Hawaii by State of Hawaii asrequested by clerk. (Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/17/2017)
02/17/2017 49 SUPPLEMENT re 44 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for S. Solow Filing fee $ 300,receipt number 0975−1831306. filed by State of Hawaii by State of Hawaii asrequested by clerk. (Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/17/2017)
02/17/2017 50 SUPPLEMENT re 45 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for T. Schmidt Filing fee $ 300,receipt number 0975−1831312. filed by State of Hawaii by State of Hawaii asrequested by clerk. (Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 02/17/2017)
02/23/2017 51 ORDER granting 41 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Alexander Bowerman].Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 2/23/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/23/2017)
02/23/2017 52 ORDER Granting 42 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Colleen Roh Sinzdak].Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 2/23/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/23/2017)
02/23/2017 53 ORDER Granting 43 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Mitchell Reich].Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 2/23/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/23/2017)
02/23/2017 54 ORDER Granting 44 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Sara Solow].Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 2/23/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/23/2017)
02/23/2017 55 ORDER Granting 45 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Thomas Schmidt].Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 2/23/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 35 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 02/23/2017)
03/06/2017 56 NOTICE by John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department ofHomeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States of America of Filingof Executive Order John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S.Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States ofAmerica. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: New Executive Order)(Rosenberg, Brad)(Entered: 03/06/2017)
03/07/2017 57 Joint MOTION for Entry of Proposed Briefing Schedule Neal Katyal appearing forPlaintiffs Ismail Elshikh, State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 ProposedOrder)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/07/2017)
03/07/2017 58 MOTION to Lift Stay and for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint NealKatyal appearing for Plaintiffs Ismail Elshikh, State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1Exhibit Proposed Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order, # 3Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/07/2017)
03/08/2017 59 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' 58 MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND FORLEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/8/2017. − The Court lifts the litigation stay imposed by the Orders dated February 7, 2017 (Dkt. No. 27 )and February 9, 2017 (Dkt. No. []32). Plaintiffs STATE OF HAWAI'I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH mayfile a Second Amended Complaint in the form submitted to the Court as an exhibit to the Motion(Dkt. No. 58−1). (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Attachment replaced on 3/8/2017, NEFregenerated: # 1 Main Document − PDF flattened) (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/08/2017)
03/08/2017 60 BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDER.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/8/2017. Related doc: 57 (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Attachment replaced on 3/8/2017, NEFregenerated: # 1 Main Document − PDF flattened) (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/08/2017)
03/08/2017 61 NOTICE of Hearing on 65 Plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Restraining Order setfor 3/15/2017 @ 09:30 AM before JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON. Counsel mayparticipate by phone by notifying Judge Watson's Courtroom Manager(808−541−3073) by 3/14/2017 and providing the phone number where counselmay be reached at the time of the hearing. The Court will contact the parties viaphone at the time of the hearing.(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Modified on 3/9/2017 (tyk, ). (Entered:03/08/2017)
03/08/2017 62 ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR MEDIA BLOGGING as to Fox Newsrepresentative Lee Ross. Permission approved for the following hearing: Motionfor TRO to be held on 3/15/17 at 9:30 am. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 03/08/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/08/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 36 of 64
03/08/2017 63 ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR MEDIA BLOGGING as to Fox Newsrepresentative William LaJeunesse. Permission is approved for the followinghearing: Motion for TRO, to be held on 03/15/2017 at 9:30 am.Signed by JUDGEDERRICK K. WATSON on 03/08/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/08/2017)
03/08/2017 64 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF(SECOND) against John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S.Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States ofAmerica, filed by State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 −Copy of Executive Order dated 3/6/2017, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Copy of Executive Orderdated 1/27/2017, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Collection of relevant Data for Hawaii, # 4Exhibit 4 − Tables for fiscal years 2005−2015, # 5 Exhibit 5 − Copy of table ofcontents and executive summary, # 6 Exhibit 6 − Copy of press release, # 7 Exhibit7 − Copy of transcript, # 8 Exhibit 8 − Copy of Washington Post Article, # 9Exhibit 9 − Copy of this NBC News article, # 10 Exhibit 10 − Copy of the draftDHS report, # 11 Exhibit 11 − Final version of DHS report, # 12 Exhibit 12 −Copy of NBC News article, # 13 Exhibit 13 − Copy of Dissent Channelmemorandum, # 14 Exhibit 14 − Copy of DHS Q# 15 Certificate ofService)(Katyal, Neal) Docket title text added on 3/9/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/08/2017)
03/08/2017 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Neal Katyal appearing for PlaintiffsIsmail Elshikh, State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support ofPlaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 2 Certificate of Word Count,# 3 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Katyal,Neal) (Entered: 03/08/2017)
03/08/2017 66 Declaration re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order . (Attachments: # 1Exhibit A − Dec. of Ismail Elshikh, PhD, # 2 Exhibit B−1 − Supp. Dec. of GeorgeSzigeti, # 3 Exhibit B−2 − Orig. Dec. of George Szigeti, # 4 Exhibit C−1 − Supp.Dec. of Luis P. Salaveria, # 5 Exhibit C−2 − Orig. Dec. of Luis P. Salaveria, # 6Exhibit D−1 − Supp. Dec. of Risa E. Dickson, # 7 Exhibit D−2 − Orig. Dec. ofRisa E. Dickson, # 8 Exhibit E − Dec. of Hakim Ounsafi, # 9 Certificate ofService)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/08/2017)
03/09/2017 ADVISORY ENTRY to all Filing Parties re entry docket numbers 10 Declarationand 66 Declaration. As these filings were filed as a separate entry, the cover pageof the Declaration should include counsel identification in the top left corner of thefirst page.FURTHER, although filing parties have correctly attached the Memorandum,Exhibits as a separate ECF attachment to the main document, the document titlecaption on the cover page SHOULD also include these documents (i.e. Declarationof Neal K. Katyal in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary RestrainingOrder; Exh A; Exh B−1; Exh B−2; Exh C−1; Certificate of Service). A fewexamples of entries which did not include the attachments in the document titlecaption on the cover page: 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed byState of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, 64 Amended Complaint filed by State of Hawaii,Ismail Elshikh was filed incorrectly in this case. No further action necessary as tothe entries above unless further directed by the court.Filing parties are advised to refer to the court's website www.hid.uscourts.govand refer to the CM/ECF User Guide located under CM/ECF Resourcesand/or Local Rules. (ecs, ) (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/09/2017 67 ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR MEDIA BLOGGING as toASSOCIATED PRESS representatives Jennifer Kelleher, Audrey McAvoy, CalebJones, Cathy Bussewitz. Permission is approved for the following hearing: Motionfor TRO, to be held on 03/15/2017 at 9:30 am. and various subsequenton−the−record proceedings in open court. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 3/9/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 37 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/09/2017 68 ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR MEDIA BLOGGING as toBLOOMBERG NEWS representative Kartikay Mehrotra. Permission is approvedfor the following hearing: Motion for TRO, to be held on 03/15/2017 at 9:30 am.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on on 3/9/2017. [Note: Signature of Kartikay Mehrotra is Dated: 3/8/2018 ] (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/09/2017 69 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Re Claire Loebs Davis Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841084.Mark S. Davis appearing for Amicus AMICUS CURIAELAW PROFESSORS (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Clare Loebs Davis, # 2Order)(Davis, Mark) (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/09/2017 70 ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR MEDIA BLOGGING as to representativeDan Levine of Reuters News.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on03/09/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/09/2017 71 NOTICE of Appearance by Clare M. Hanusz on behalf of Amici CuriaeInternational Law Scholars and Nongovermental Organizations on behalf of AmiciCuriae International Law Scholars and Nongovermental Organizations. (Hanusz,Clare) (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/09/2017 72 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice as to Aaron Fellmeth Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841127.Clare M. Hanusz appearing for Amicus Amici Curiae InternationalLaw Scholars and Nongovermental Organizations (Hanusz, Clare) Modified on to add
name of Pro Hac Vice attorney 3/10/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/09/2017)
03/10/2017 73 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice As to John B. Harris Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841243.Nicole Y.C. L. Altman appearing for Amicus Anti−DefamationLeague (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of John B. Harris, # 2 Order)(Altman,Nicole) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 74 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Christopher J. Hajec Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841401.Denise M. Hevicon appearing for Amicus ImmigrationReform Law Institute (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel, # 2 OrderGranting Motion)(Hevicon, Denise) Modified to add name of pro hac vice on 3/10/2017 (ecs, ).
(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 75 ORDER Granting 73 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [John B. Harris]Signed by Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 3/10/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 76 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Minkin on behalf of Roderick and SolangeMacArthur Justice Center on behalf of Amicus Curiae Roderick and SolangeMacArthur Justice Center. (Minkin, David) Modified docket text on 3/10/2017 (ecs, ).
(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 77 NOTICE of Appearance by Claire Wong Black on behalf of Jay Hirabayashi, FredT. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Holly Yasui, Karen Korematsu, AsianAmericans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AsianLaw Caucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Atlanta), Asian Americans
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 38 of 64
Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Los Angeles),Asian American Legal Defense And Education Fund (AALDEF), HispanicNational Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese American Citizens League, HonoluluChapter (JACL Honolulu), LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National Bar Association,South Asian Bar Association of North America (SABA North America) on behalfof Jay Hirabayashi, Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Holly Yasui,Karen Korematsu, Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Los Angeles), Asian American Legal Defense And EducationFund (AALDEF), Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese AmericanCitizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACL Honolulu), LatinoJustice PRLDEF,Inc., National Bar Association, South Asian Bar Association of North America(SABA North America). (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Black, Claire)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 78 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa W. Cataldo on behalf of Roderick and SolangeMacArthur Justice Center on behalf of Roderick and Solange MacArthur JusticeCenter. (Cataldo, Lisa) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 79 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica M. Wan on behalf of Roderick and SolangeMacArthur Justice Center on behalf of Roderick and Solange MacArthur JusticeCenter. (Wan, Jessica) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 80 MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order AmicusCuriae Brief of the Immigration Reform Law Institute in Support of Defendantsfiled by Immigration Reform Law Institute. (Hevicon, Denise) Modified docket titletext on 3/13/2017. Note: Amicus Brief withdrawn per 136 Notice and 137 Motion to Leave to FileAmicus filed. (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 81 ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR MEDIA BLOGGING as to HONOLULUSTAR ADVERTISER representatives Timothy Hurley, Nelson Daranciang..Permission is approved for the following hearing: Motion for TRO, to be held on03/15/2017 at 9:30 am.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/10/2017. [Note: No email addressprovided on form] (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing. Adhoc: Honolulu Star Advertiser. (NEF). (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 82 NOTICE of Appearance by Louise K.Y. Ing on behalf of Asian American LegalDefense And Education Fund (AALDEF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(AAJC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), AsianAmericans Advancing Justice (Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Chicago), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. KorematsuCenter for Law and Equality, Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association(HNBA), Japanese American Citizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACLHonolulu), Karen Korematsu, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National BarAssociation, South Asian Bar Association of North America (SABA NorthAmerica), Holly Yasui on behalf of Asian American Legal Defense And EducationFund (AALDEF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality,Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese AmericanCitizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACL Honolulu), Karen Korematsu,LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National Bar Association, South Asian BarAssociation of North America (SABA North America), Holly Yasui. (Attachments:# 1 Certificate of Service)(Ing, Louise) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 83 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice as to Robert A. Johnson Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841562.Louise K.Y. Ing appearing for Amicus Parties AsianAmerican Legal Defense And Education Fund (AALDEF), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (AAJC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Asian LawCaucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Atlanta), Asian Americans
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 39 of 64
Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Los Angeles),Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Jay Hirabayashi, HispanicNational Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese American Citizens League, HonoluluChapter (JACL Honolulu), Karen Korematsu, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc.,National Bar Association, South Asian Bar Association of North America (SABANorth America), Holly Yasui (Ing, Louise) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 84 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice as to Amir H. Ali; Declaration of Counsel; Consent ofLocal Counsel; (Proposed) Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as toAmir H. Ali Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975−1841589.David J. Minkinappearing for Amicus Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center (Minkin,David) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 85 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by Lisa W. Munger on behalf of HumanRights First, KIND (Kids in Need of Defense), Tahirih Justice Center, HIAS.(Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 86 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HIAS, Human Rights First, KIND (Kids inNeed of Defense), Tahirih Justice Center. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 87 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice as to Pratik A. Shah Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841600.Louise K.Y. Ing appearing for Amicus Parties Asian AmericanLegal Defense And Education Fund (AALDEF), Asian Americans AdvancingJustice (AAJC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), AsianAmericans Advancing Justice (Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Chicago), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. KorematsuCenter for Law and Equality, Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association(HNBA), Japanese American Citizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACLHonolulu), Karen Korematsu, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National BarAssociation, South Asian Bar Association of North America (SABA NorthAmerica), Holly Yasui (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel)(Ing, Louise)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 88 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Alan C. Turner Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841611.Lisa W. Munger appearing for Amicus Parties HIAS, HumanRights First, KIND (Kids in Need of Defense), Tahirih Justice Center(Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel [Alan C. Turner], # 2 [Proposed] OrderGranting Mtn to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Alan C. Turner], # 3 Certificate ofService)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 89 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Jessica M. Weisel Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841615.Louise K.Y. Ing appearing for Amicus Parties Asian AmericanLegal Defense And Education Fund (AALDEF), Asian Americans AdvancingJustice (AAJC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), AsianAmericans Advancing Justice (Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Chicago), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. KorematsuCenter for Law and Equality, Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association(HNBA), Japanese American Citizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACLHonolulu), Karen Korematsu, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National BarAssociation, South Asian Bar Association of North America (SABA NorthAmerica), Holly Yasui (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel)(Ing, Louise)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 90 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Harrison J. (Buzz) Frahn Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841619.Lisa W. Munger appearing for Amicus Parties HIAS,Human Rights First, KIND (Kids in Need of Defense), Tahirih Justice Center(Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel [Harrison J. (Buzz) Frahn], # 2[Proposed] Order Granting Mtn to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Harrison J. (Buzz)Frahn], # 3 Certificate of Service)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 91 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole Y.C. L. Altman on behalf of Anti−DefamationLeague on behalf of Anti−Defamation League. (Altman, Nicole) (Entered:03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 92 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Anti−Defamation League. (Altman, Nicole)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 40 of 64
03/10/2017 93 MOTION for Leave to File Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for TemporaryRestraining Order Nicole Y.C. L. Altman appearing for Amicus Anti−DefamationLeague (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Altman, Nicole)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 94 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD recused.Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG. Please reflectCivil Case No: CV 17−00050 DKW−KSC on all further filings. Signed byMagistrate Judge KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 3/10/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 95 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging for representative Randy Brandtof ABC news. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 03/10/2017. (apg,dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 96 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Asian American Legal Defense And EducationFund (AALDEF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality,Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese AmericanCitizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACL Honolulu), Karen Korematsu,LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National Bar Association, South Asian BarAssociation of North America (SABA North America), Holly Yasui. (Ing, Louise)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 97 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging for representative Ian Lovett ofWall Street Journal.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 03/10/2017.(apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Additional attachment(s) added on3/13/2017: # 1 Supplement Amended request for Media Blogging) (apg, dist).Modified on 3/13/2017 to attached the amended request with the correct hearingdate of 3/15/2017 (apg, dist). (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 98 MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiffs Louise K.Y.Ing appearing for Amicus Parties Asian American Legal Defense And EducationFund (AALDEF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality,Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese AmericanCitizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACL Honolulu), Karen Korematsu,LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National Bar Association, South Asian BarAssociation of North America (SABA North America), Holly Yasui (Attachments:# 1 Amici Curiae Brief, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Ing, Louise) (Entered:03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 99 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Benedict on behalf of Congregation B'naiJeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi JoelMosbacher, Reverend Timothy Tutt, Rabbi Joy Levitt, The Sikh Coalition onbehalf of Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Rabbi SharonKleinbaum, Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, Reverend Timothy Tutt, Rabbi Joy Levitt, TheSikh Coalition. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Benedict, Thomas)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 41 of 64
03/10/2017 100 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by Kimberly Ann Greeley on behalf ofThe Employment Law Alliance. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Greeley,Kimberly) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 101 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by Anna M. Elento−Sneed on behalf ofThe Employment Law Alliance. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Elento−Sneed, Anna) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 102 NOTICE of Case Reassignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 17−00050DKW−KSC on all further filings. 94 Order of Recusal filed on March 10, 2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 103 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separationof Church and State and the Southern Poverty Law Center in Support of Plaintiffs'Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order Steven D. Strauss appearing forAmicus American United for Separation of Church and State and Southern PovertyLaw Center (Strauss, Steven) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 104 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by Steven D. Strauss on behalf ofAmerican United for Separation of Church and State and Southern Poverty LawCenter. (Strauss, Steven) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 105 MEMORANDUM in Support re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining OrderComprising Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church andState and the Southern Poverty Law Center in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for aTemporary Restraining Order filed by American United for Separation of Churchand State and Southern Poverty Law Center. (Strauss, Steven) (Entered:03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 106 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Kelly M. PercivalRichard B. Katskee Filing fee $ 300,receipt number 0975−1841833.Steven D. Strauss appearing for Amicus AmericanUnited for Separation of Church and State and Southern Poverty Law Center(Strauss, Steven) Modified on 3/10/2017 to correct name of Pro Hac Vice. (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 107 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Richard B. Katskee Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841845.Steven D. Strauss appearing for Amicus American United forSeparation of Church and State and Southern Poverty Law Center (Strauss, Steven)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 108 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Andrew L. Nellis Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841850.Steven D. Strauss appearing for Amicus American United forSeparation of Church and State and Southern Poverty Law Center (Strauss, Steven)(Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 109 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice (P.K. RUNKLES−PEARSON) Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841851.Anna M. Elento−Sneed appearing for Amicus TheEmployment Law Alliance (Elento−Sneed, Anna) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 110 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Roderick and Solange MacArthur JusticeCenter. (Minkin, David) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 111 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice (Mary Ellen Simonson) Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841872.Anna M. Elento−Sneed appearing for Amicus TheEmployment Law Alliance (Elento−Sneed, Anna) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 112 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice (Natasha J. Baker) Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841877.Kimberly Ann Greeley appearing for Amicus The EmploymentLaw Alliance (Greeley, Kimberly) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 113 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice (Alison M. Hamer) Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841882.Kimberly Ann Greeley appearing for Amicus The EmploymentLaw Alliance (Greeley, Kimberly) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 42 of 64
03/10/2017 114 MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief; Memorandum in Support of Motion;Declaration of David J. Minkin; Exhibit "1"; Certificate of Service David J.Minkin appearing for Amicus Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center(Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, # 2 Declaration of David J.Minkin, # 3 Exhibit "1", # 4 Certificate of Service)(Minkin, David) (Entered:03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 115 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 69 72 74 83 8487 88 89 90 106 107 108 109 . Signed by JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on3/10/2017. On March 9 and 10, 2017, the following attorneys filed Motions to Appear Pro HacVice: 1) Claire Loebs Davis [doc. no. 69]; 2) Aaron Fellmeth [doc. no. 72]; 3) Christopher J. Hajec[doc. no. 74]; 4) Robert A. Johnson [doc. no. 83]; 5) Amir H. Ali [doc. no. 84]; 6) Pratik A. Shah[doc. no. 87]; 7) Alan Turner [doc. no. 88]; 8) Jessica M. Weisel [doc. no. 89]; 9) Harrison J. (Buzz)Frahn [doc. no. 90]; 10) Kelly M. Percival [doc. no. 106]; 11) Richard B. Katskee [doc. no. 107];12) Andrew Nellis [doc. no. 108]; and 13) P.K. Runkles− Pearson [doc. no. 109]. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Attachment(s) replaced on 3/10/2017 and NEFregenerated : # 1 Main Document CORRECT) (ecs, ). Modified on 3/13/2017 to clarify that JudgeChang signed the Order. (apg, dist). (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 116 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Human Rights First, KIND (Kids in Need ofDefense), Tahirih Justice Center, and HIAS as Amici Curiae in Support ofPlaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Lisa W. Munger appearing forAmicus Parties HIAS, Human Rights First, KIND (Kids in Need of Defense),Tahirih Justice Center (Attachments: # 1 Brief of Amici Curiae, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 117 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. 111 112 .Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/10/2017.[Pro Hac Vice as to Mary Ellen Simonson and Natasha J. Baker ] (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 118 MOTION for Leave to File (MOTION OF PARTICIPATING LAW FIRMS OFTHE EMPLOYMENT LAW ALLIANCE FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUSCURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS) Anna M. Elento−Sneed appearing forAmicus The Employment Law Alliance (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum inSupport of Motion, # 2 Declaration of Anna Elento−Sneed, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4Certificate of Service)(Elento−Sneed, Anna) (Entered: 03/10/2017)
03/10/2017 146 ORDER APPROVING Request for Media Blogging as to representative RuiKaneya of Honolulu Civil Beat. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on03/10/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/11/2017 119 MOTION for Leave to File Brief for Amici Curiae Aaron Fellmeth appearing forAmicus Amici Curiae International Law Scholars and NongovermentalOrganizations (Fellmeth, Aaron) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 120 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark S. Davis on behalf of Amicus Curiae LawProfessors on behalf of Amicus Curiae Law Professors. (Attachments: # 1Certificate of Service)(Davis, Mark) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 121 NOTICE of Appearance by Claire Loebs Davis on behalf of Amicus Curiae LawProfessors on behalf of Amicus Curiae Law Professors. (Attachments: # 1Certificate of Service)(Davis, Claire) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 43 of 64
03/11/2017 122 MOTION for Leave to File AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE LAWPROFESSORS Claire Loebs Davis appearing for Amicus Amicus Curiae LawProfessors (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Davis, Claire)(Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 123 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Motion of Participating Law Firms ofthe Employment Law Alliance for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Supportof Plaintiffs Anna M. Elento−Sneed appearing for Amicus The Employment LawAlliance (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, # 2 Declaration ofAnna Elento−Sneed, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Elento−Sneed,Anna) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 124 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela W. Bunn on behalf of National Asian PacificAmerican Bar Association on behalf of National Asian Pacific American BarAssociation. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered:03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 125 NOTICE of Appearance by John S. Rhee on behalf of National Asian PacificAmerican Bar Association on behalf of National Asian Pacific American BarAssociation. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Rhee, John) (Entered:03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 126 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Meredith S. H. Higashi Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1841983.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National AsianPacific American Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Meredith S. H.Higashi, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 127 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of James W. Kim Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841984.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian PacificAmerican Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of James W. Kim, # 2Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 128 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Tina R. Matsuoka Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841985.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian PacificAmerican Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Tina R. Matsuoka, # 2Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 129 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Navdeep Singh Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841986.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian PacificAmerican Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Navdeep Singh, # 2Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/11/2017 130 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Rachana A. Pathak Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841987.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian PacificAmerican Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachana A. Pathak, #2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2017)
03/12/2017 131 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Michael Baker Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841996.Thomas Benedict appearing for Amicus Parties Congregation B'naiJeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Joy Levitt,Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, The Sikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt (Benedict,Thomas) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 132 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Robert D. Fram Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841997.Thomas Benedict appearing for Amicus Parties Congregation B'naiJeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Joy Levitt,Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, The Sikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt (Attachments:# 1 Certificate of Service)(Benedict, Thomas) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 133 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Karun Tilak Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1841998.Thomas Benedict appearing for Amicus Parties Congregation B'naiJeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Joy Levitt,Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, The Sikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt (Attachments:# 1 Certificate of Service)(Benedict, Thomas) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 134 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, Reverend CurtisW. Hart, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Joy Levitt, Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, TheSikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt re 131 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 44 of 64
Michael Baker Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975−1841996. (Benedict,Thomas) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 135 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Benedict on behalf of Congregation B'naiJeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Joy Levitt,Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, The Sikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt, The RightReverend Andrew Dietsche, Episcopal Bishop of New York, The Right ReverendAllen K. Shin, Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal, The Right Reverend Mary D.Glasspool, Bishop Assistant of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, Imam AbdulMalik Mujahid, The Right Reverend Lawrence C. Provenzano, Episcopal Bishopof Long Island, The Muslim Public Affairs Council, The Right Reverend MarcHandley Andrus, Episcopal Bishop of California, Congregation Beit SimchatTorah, Rabbi Frederick Reeves, Rabbi Peretz Wolf−Prusan, Rabbi Noa Kushner,Union Theological Seminary, Rabbi John Rosove, United Methodist Women,Rabbi James Ponet, Hyde Park &Kenwood Interfaith Council, Rabbi MichaelStrassfeld on behalf of Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, Reverend Curtis W. Hart,Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Joy Levitt, Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, The SikhCoalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt, The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche,Episcopal Bishop of New York, The Right Reverend Allen K. Shin, BishopSuffragan of the Episcopal, The Right Reverend Mary D. Glasspool, BishopAssistant of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, TheRight Reverend Lawrence C. Provenzano, Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, TheMuslim Public Affairs Council, The Right Reverend Marc Handley Andrus,Episcopal Bishop of California, Congregation Beit Simchat Torah, Rabbi FrederickReeves, Rabbi Peretz Wolf−Prusan, Rabbi Noa Kushner, Union TheologicalSeminary, Rabbi John Rosove, United Methodist Women, Rabbi James Ponet,Hyde Park &Kenwood Interfaith Council, Rabbi Michael Strassfeld. (Benedict,Thomas) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 136 NOTICE by Immigration Reform Law Institute re 80 Memorandum. WithdrawingAmicus Brief filed in Docket No. 80 Immigration Reform Law Institute. (Hevicon,Denise) Modified docket title text on 3/13/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 137 MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief of the Immigration Reform LawInstitute in Support of Defendants Denise M. Hevicon appearing for AmicusImmigration Reform Law Institute (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed AmicusCuriae Brief, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Hevicon, Denise) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 138 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae Interfaith Coalition ThomasBenedict appearing for Amicus Parties Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, CongregationBeit Simchat Torah, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Hyde Park &Kenwood InterfaithCouncil, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Noa Kushner, Rabbi Joy Levitt, RabbiJoel Mosbacher, Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, Rabbi James Ponet, Rabbi FrederickReeves, Rabbi John Rosove, Rabbi Michael Strassfeld, The Muslim Public AffairsCouncil, The Right Reverend Allen K. Shin, Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal,The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche, Episcopal Bishop of New York, The RightReverend Lawrence C. Provenzano, Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, The RightReverend Marc Handley Andrus, Episcopal Bishop of California, The RightReverend Mary D. Glasspool, Bishop Assistant of the Episcopal Diocese of NewYork, The Sikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt, Union Theological Seminary,United Methodist Women, Rabbi Peretz Wolf−Prusan (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1,# 2 Certificate of Service)(Benedict, Thomas) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 139 Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Asian Pacific American BarAssociation. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered:03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 140 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of the National Asian Pacific American BarAssociation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Pamela W. Bunn appearingfor Amicus National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (Attachments: # 1Exhibit "A" − Brief, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela) (Entered:03/12/2017)
03/12/2017 141 NOTICE of Appearance by Duane R. Miyashiro on behalf of State of Illinois onbehalf of State of Illinois. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service Certificate ofService)(Miyashiro, Duane) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 45 of 64
03/12/2017 142 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of David L. Franklin Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1842014.Duane R. Miyashiro appearing for Amicus State of Illinois(Miyashiro, Duane) (Entered: 03/12/2017)
03/13/2017 143 MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae brief of the American Center for Lawand Justice Robert K. Matsumoto appearing for Amicus American Center for Lawand Justice (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of law supporting motion, # 2Declaration of Attorney Robert K. Matsumoto, # 3 Proposed Amicus Curiae Briefof the ACLJ, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Matsumoto, Robert) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 144 Corporate Disclosure Statement by American Center for Law and Justice.(Matsumoto, Robert) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 145 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Orderfiled by John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department ofHomeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States of America.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: March 6, 2017 Letter from DOJ and DHS to WhiteHouse, # 2 Exhibit B: Department of State Q# 3 Certificate of Service)(Rosenberg,Brad) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 147 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging from 03/15/2017 onward, as tothe following representatives of CNN: Stephanie Elam, Traci Tamura and GregCannes. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 03/13/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 148 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett R. Tobin on behalf of Massachusetts TechnologyLeadership Council, Inc. on behalf of Massachusetts Technology LeadershipCouncil, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Tobin, Brett) (Entered:03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 149 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Michael B. Keating Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1842257.Brett R. Tobin appearing for Amicus Massachusetts TechnologyLeadership Council, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Tobin, Brett)(Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 150 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Kristyn DeFilipp Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1842285.Brett R. Tobin appearing for Amicus Massachusetts TechnologyLeadership Council, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Tobin, Brett)(Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 151 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Christopher E. Hart Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1842292.Brett R. Tobin appearing for Amicus MassachusettsTechnology Leadership Council, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Tobin, Brett) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 152 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Daniel L. McFadden Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1842299.Brett R. Tobin appearing for Amicus MassachusettsTechnology Leadership Council, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Tobin, Brett) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 153 AMENDED DOCUMENT by State of Illinois, State of California, State ofConnecticut, State of Delaware, State of Iowa, State of Maryland, State ofMassachusetts, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Oregon, State ofRhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Virginia, The District of Columbia.Amendment to 141 Notice of Appearance of Duane R. Miyashiro. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Miyashiro, Duane) (Entered:03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 154 MOTION for Leave to File [Motion of the State of Illinois for Leave to File AmicusBrief] Duane R. Miyashiro appearing for Amicus Parties State of California, Stateof Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Iowa, State ofMaryland, State of Massachusetts, State of New Mexico, State of New York, Stateof Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Virginia, The Districtof Columbia (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, # 2
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 46 of 64
Declaration of David L. Franklin, # 3 Exhibit 1−Brief Amicus Curiae of Illinoisand Other States, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Miyashiro, Duane) (Entered:03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 155 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council,Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Tobin, Brett) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 156 NOTICE of Appearance by Nickolas A. Kacprowski on behalf of MuslimAdvocates, American Muslim Health Professionals, Muppies, The National ArabAmerican Medical Association, Network of Arab−American Professionals onbehalf of Muslim Advocates, American Muslim Health Professionals, Muppies,The National Arab American Medical Association, Network of Arab−AmericanProfessionals. (Kacprowski, Nickolas) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 157 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL B. KEATING'SMOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 149 .Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/13/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Michael Keating to be notified thru local counsel of record Brett Tobin
(Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 158 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging as to representative MichelleBroder Van Dyke of Buzz Feed News. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 03/13/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 159 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging as to representative Morad Abedof Al Jazeera Arabic. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 03/13/2017.(apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 160 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Massachusetts Technology LeadershipCouncil, Inc. As Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for TemporaryRestraining Order Brett R. Tobin appearing for Amicus Massachusetts TechnologyLeadership Council, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Proposed Brief), # 2Certificate of Service)(Tobin, Brett) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 161 NOTICE of Appearance by Regan M. Iwao on behalf of T.A. on behalf of T.A..(Iwao, Regan) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 162 NOTICE of Appearance by Lynda L. Arakawa on behalf of T.A. on behalf of T.A..(Arakawa, Lynda) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 163 MOTION for Attorney Fees , MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Richard D. BernsteinFiling fee $ 300, receipt number 0975−1842730.Regan M. Iwao appearing forAmicus T.A. (Iwao, Regan) Modified on 3/13/2017 to add name of Pro Hac Vice(ecs, ). Modified on 3/13/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 164 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Michael B. Keating Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1842736.Brett R. Tobin appearing for Amicus Massachusetts TechnologyLeadership Council, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Tobin, Brett)(Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 165 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice re ANTON A. WARE. Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1842721.Nickolas A. Kacprowski appearing for Amicus Parties AmericanMuslim Health Professionals, Muslim Advocates, Network of Arab−AmericanProfessionals, The National Arab American Medical Association, Muppies, Inc.
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 47 of 64
03/13/2017 166 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice re JOHNATHAN JAMES SMITH. Filing fee $ 300,receipt number 0975−1842742.Nickolas A. Kacprowski appearing for AmicusParties American Muslim Health Professionals, Muppies, Inc., Muslim Advocates,Network of Arab−American Professionals, The National Arab American MedicalAssociation (Kacprowski, Nickolas) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 167 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 113 126 127 128129 130 131 132 133 142 150 151 152 .Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/13/2017. − Motions Granted as to the following Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice: 1) Alison M.Hamer [doc.no. 113]; 2) Meredith S.H. Higashi [doc. no. 126];3) James W. Kim [doc. no. 127]; 4) Tina R.Matsuoka [doc. no.128]; 5) Navdeep Singh [doc. no. 129]; 6) Rachana A. Pathak[doc. no. 130]; 7)Michael Baker [doc. no. 131];8) Robert D. Fram [doc. no. 132]; 9) Karun Tilak [doc. no.133]; 10)David L. Franklin [doc. no. 142]; 11) KristynDeFilipp [doc. no. 150]; 12) Christopher E. Hart [doc.no.151]; and 13) Daniel L. McFadden [doc. no. 152]. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 168 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice re JUNAID SULAHRY. Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1842752.Nickolas A. Kacprowski appearing for Amicus PartiesAmerican Muslim Health Professionals, Muppies, Inc., Muslim Advocates,Network of Arab−American Professionals, The National Arab American MedicalAssociation (Kacprowski, Nickolas) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 169 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae T.A. in Support of Motion forTemporary Restraining Order Regan M. Iwao appearing for Amicus T.A.(Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Iwao, Regan) (Entered:03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 170 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICESigned by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/13/2017. (afc)
RICHARD D. BERNSTEIN, ESQ. (Law firm of Willkie Farr &Gallagher LLP)added as attorney pro hac vice for amicus party T.A. [Motion 163 ]
MICHAEL B. KEATING, ESQ. (Law firm Foley Hoag LLP) added as attorneypro hac vice for amicus party MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGYLEADERSHIP COUNCIL, INC. [Motion 164 ]
ANTON A. WARE, ESQ. (Law firm Arnold &Porter Kay Scholer LLP) added asattorney pro hac vice for amicus parties MUSLIM ADVOCATES; AMERICANMUSLIM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS; MUPPIES; NATIONAL ARABAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; NETWORK OF ARAB−AMERICANPROFESSIONALS. [Motion 165 ]
JOHNATHAN JAMES SMITH, ESQ. (Law firm Muslim Advocates) [Motion 166] and JUNAID SULAHRY, ESQ. (Law firm Muslim Advocates) [Motion 168 ]added as attorneys pro hac vice for amicus parties MUSLIM ADVOCATES;AMERICAN MUSLIM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS; MUPPIES; NATIONALARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCATION; NETWORK OFARAB−AMERICAN PROFESSIONALS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this documentelectronically at the e−mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).(Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 171 MOTION for Leave to File BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OFPLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, NickolasA. Kacprowski appearing for Amicus Parties American Muslim Health
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 48 of 64
Professionals, Muppies, Inc., Muslim Advocates, Network of Arab−AmericanProfessionals, The National Arab American Medical Association (Attachments: # 1Corporate Disclosure Statement, # 2 Main Document, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Certificateof Service)(Kacprowski, Nickolas) (Entered: 03/13/2017)
03/13/2017 175 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging as to representative Joe SatomiLee of NHK Japan (LA Bureau) on 03/15/17 at 9:30 am. Signed by JUDGEDERRICK K. WATSON on 03/13/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/13/2017 183 MOTION to Intervene by Defendant Vincent Lucas (Attachments: # 1[PROPOSED] Intervenor Vincent Lucas's Cross Complaint against the State ofHawaii and Ismail Elshikh, Exh A − B, # 2 Mailing Documentation)(ecs, ) [Note:Document received does not have an Original signature and no other copies provided to the court.]Modified on 3/16/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/13/2017 184 MOTION to Expedite His Motion and to Intervene and to Permit Him to Use theCourt's ECF System as a Filing User − by Intervenor Vincent Lucas (Attachments:# 1 Mailing Documentation)(ecs, ) [Note: Document submitted is not an Original signature and no
copies submitted] Modified on 3/16/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/13/2017 189 MOTION to Intervene and to Dismiss and Enjoin Defendants by IntervenorFrederick Banks (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Documentation, # 2 Cover letter) [Note: No CV case number referenced on the Motion, however information as to the case ismentioned in the cover letter] (ecs, ) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 172 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey B. Wall on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America. (Wall, Jeffrey) (Entered:03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 173 ORDER Approving Request for Blogging as to representative Kalani Takase ofThe Washington Post on 03/15/17 at 9:30 am.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 03/14/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 174 NOTICE of Appearance by Claire Wong Black on behalf of New York Universityon behalf of New York University. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Black,Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 176 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging as to representative Joyce M.Brown of Daily Kos on 03/15/2017 at 9:30 am. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 03/14/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 177 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Seth D. Fiur Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843212.Claire Wong Black appearing for Amicus New York University(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 178 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Steven E. Obus Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843216.Claire Wong Black appearing for Amicus New York University(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 49 of 64
03/14/2017 179 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Tiffany M. Woo Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843219.Claire Wong Black appearing for Amicus New York University(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 180 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Terrance J. Nolan Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843220.Claire Wong Black appearing for Amicus New York University(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 181 EO: The Court GRANTS the following Motions For Leave to File Amicus CuriaeBrief Docket Nos.: 93 , 98 , 103 , 114 , 116 , 118 , 119 , 122 , 123 , 137 , 138 , 140, 143 , 154 , 160 , 169 and 171 . (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 182 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Benedict on behalf of Congregation B'naiJeshurun, Congregation Beit Simchat Torah, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Hyde Park&Kenwood Interfaith Council, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Noa Kushner,Rabbi Joy Levitt, Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, RabbiJames Ponet, Rabbi Frederick Reeves, Rabbi John Rosove, Rabbi MichaelStrassfeld, The Muslim Public Affairs Council, The Right Reverend Allen K. Shin,Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal, The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche,Episcopal Bishop of New York, The Right Reverend Lawrence C. Provenzano,Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, The Right Reverend Marc Handley Andrus,Episcopal Bishop of California, The Right Reverend Mary D. Glasspool, BishopAssistant of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, The Sikh Coalition, ReverendTimothy Tutt, Union Theological Seminary, United Methodist Women, RabbiPeretz Wolf−Prusan, National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA, IKAR,Rabbi Sharon Brous on behalf of Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, Congregation BeitSimchat Torah, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Hyde Park &Kenwood InterfaithCouncil, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Noa Kushner, Rabbi Joy Levitt, RabbiJoel Mosbacher, Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, Rabbi James Ponet, Rabbi FrederickReeves, Rabbi John Rosove, Rabbi Michael Strassfeld, The Muslim Public AffairsCouncil, The Right Reverend Allen K. Shin, Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal,The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche, Episcopal Bishop of New York, The RightReverend Lawrence C. Provenzano, Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, The RightReverend Marc Handley Andrus, Episcopal Bishop of California, The RightReverend Mary D. Glasspool, Bishop Assistant of the Episcopal Diocese of NewYork, The Sikh Coalition, Reverend Timothy Tutt, Union Theological Seminary,United Methodist Women, Rabbi Peretz Wolf−Prusan, National Council ofChurches of Christ in the USA, IKAR, Rabbi Sharon Brous. (Benedict, Thomas)(Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 185 MOTION To Add Additional Amici to Amici Curiae Interfaith Coalition's AmicusBrief; Certificate of Service Thomas Benedict appearing for Amicus Parties RabbiSharon Brous, Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, Congregation Beit Simchat Torah,Reverend Curtis W. Hart, Hyde Park &Kenwood Interfaith Council, IKAR, RabbiSharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Noa Kushner, Rabbi Joy Levitt, Rabbi Joel Mosbacher,Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA,Rabbi James Ponet, Rabbi Frederick Reeves, Rabbi John Rosove, Rabbi MichaelStrassfeld, The Muslim Public Affairs Council, The Right Reverend AndrewDietsche, Episcopal Bishop of New York, The Right Reverend Lawrence C.Provenzano, Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, The Right Reverend Marc HandleyAndrus, Episcopal Bishop of California, The Right Reverend Mary D. Glasspool,Bishop Assistant of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, The Sikh Coalition,Reverend Timothy Tutt, Union Theological Seminary, United Methodist Women,Rabbi Peretz Wolf−Prusan (Benedict, Thomas) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 186 MEMORANDUM re 140 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of the National AsianPacific American Bar Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Briefof the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association filed by National AsianPacific American Bar Association. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Bunn,Pamela), forwarded documents to JUDGE DERRICK K WATSON (Entered:03/14/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 50 of 64
03/14/2017 187 NOTICE of Appearance by James B. Rogers on behalf of New York University onbehalf of New York University. (Rogers, James) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 188 EO: Judicial Conference of the United States policy allows a judge to authorizebroadcasting of court proceedings to adjacent areas for the purpose of judicialadministration. Consistent with that policy, the Court hereby authorizes the audioof the hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order, set for March15, 2017 at 9:30 a.m., to be broadcast in up to two adjacent courtrooms to theextent necessary to accommodate public interest. (JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 190 EO: The Court is in receipt of the Motions to Intervene filed by Frederick Banksand Vincent Lucas. Dkt. Nos. 183 and 189. The Motions are DENIED. NeitherMotion identifies a statutory right to intervene within the meaning of eitherFed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) or 24(b). Moreover, the disposition of this action will not impairor impede either Movant's ability to protect his rights or interests. Finally, neitherMovant has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common questionof law or fact sufficient for the Court to exercise its discretion in favor ofintervention.
IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 191 REPLY to Response to Motion re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Orderfiled by State of Hawaii. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Word Count, # 2Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service − a copy of 190 Order on Motions toIntervene has been served by First Class Mail upon Frederick Banks at the addressof record on March 14, 2017. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received thedocument electronically at the e−mail address listed on the Notice of ElectronicFiling (NEF). (tyk) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 192 MEMORANDUM in Support re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order(Brief of Amicus Curiae) filed by Anti−Defamation League. (Attachments: # 1Appendix, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Altman, Nicole) Modified on 3/14/2017 (emt, ).
(Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 193 EO: On 3/13/17, proposed intervenor Vincent Lucas filed a Motion to Expedite HisMotion to Intervene and to Permit Him to Use the Court's ECF System as a FilingUser. Given that Judge Watson denied Mr. Lucas' Motion to Intervene, doc. no.190 , the present Motion is DENIED as MOOT.
(MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG)(chang1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this documentelectronically at the e−mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by firstclass mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 194 RESPONSE in Support re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed byMassachusetts Technology Leadership Council, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificateof Service)(Tobin, Brett) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 51 of 64
03/14/2017 195 MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order [Brief ofAmici Curiae] filed by HIAS, Human Rights First, KIND (Kids in Need ofDefense), Tahirih Justice Center. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Munger,Lisa) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service − a copy of 190 Order on Motion toIntervene has been served upon Vincent Lucas, Ph.D. electronically at the emailaddress listed on the pleading on March 14, 2017. Registered Participants ofCM/ECF received the document electronically at the e−mail address listed on theNotice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (tyk) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 196 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging a to Fumiko Chun of TBS, TokyoBroadcasting Service on 03/15/2017.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSONon 03/14/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 197 MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Brief of AmiciCuriae Interfaith Coalition in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for a TemporaryRestraining Order [Doc. No. 65]; Certificate of Service filed by CongregationB'nai Jeshurun, Congregation Beit Simchat Torah, Reverend Curtis W. Hart, HydePark &Kenwood Interfaith Council, Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, Rabbi Noa Kushner,Rabbi Joy Levitt, Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, RabbiJames Ponet, Rabbi Frederick Reeves, Rabbi John Rosove, Rabbi MichaelStrassfeld, The Muslim Public Affairs Council, The Right Reverend Allen K. Shin,Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal, The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche,Episcopal Bishop of New York, The Right Reverend Lawrence C. Provenzano,Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, The Right Reverend Marc Handley Andrus,Episcopal Bishop of California, The Right Reverend Mary D. Glasspool, BishopAssistant of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, The Sikh Coalition, ReverendTimothy Tutt, Union Theological Seminary, United Methodist Women, RabbiPeretz Wolf−Prusan. (Benedict, Thomas) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 198 MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order [MUSLIMADVOCATES, AMERICAN MUSLIM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, MUPPIES,INC., THE NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, ANDNETWORK OF ARAB−AMERICAN PROFESSIONALS' BRIEF OF AMICICURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A TEMPORARYRESTRAINING ORDER], filed by American Muslim Health Professionals,Muppies, Inc., Muslim Advocates, Network of Arab−American Professionals, TheNational Arab American Medical Association. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration ofAnton A. Ware, # 2 Exhibit 1 − Shutdown Press Release, # 3 Exhibit 2 − AndersonCooper Interview, # 4 Exhibit 3 − State Rudy Guiliani, # 5 Exhibit 4 − Miller onFox News, # 6 Exhibit 5 − WaPo Kansas Suspect, # 7 Exhibit 6 − Seattle Kent, # 8Exhibit 7 − Fire store owner, # 9 Exhibit 8 − WaPo pipe attack, # 10 Exhibit 9 −Spate of mosque fires stretches across the country, # 11 Exhibit 10 − Politicoabsolute no choice but to close down mosques, # 12 Exhibit 11 − GeorgetownBridge Initiative Trump Cites Flowed Poll, # 13 Exhibit 12 − RepublicanCandidates Debate in North Charleston, South Carolina, # 14 Exhibit 13 −Transcript Donald Trump's national security speech, # 15 Exhibit 14 − 60 MinutesTrranscript, # 16 Exhibit 15 − Meet the Press, # 17 Exhibit 16 − PresidentialCandidates Debates, # 18 Exhibit 17 − Christian Broadcasting Network, # 19Exhibit 18 − Donald Trump on Twitter defends Muslim ban, calls work a 'horriblemess', # 20 Exhibit 19 − Pew Reseach Center 2016 Refugees, # 21 Exhibit 20 −DJT Tweet, # 22 Exhibit 21 − So called judge tweet, # 23 Exhibit 22 − See you incourt tweet, # 24 Exhibit 23 − Sean Spicer press conference, # 25 Exhibit 24 −Stephen Miller key engineer, # 26 Exhibit 25 − Stephen Miller Islamofascism, # 27Exhibit 26 − Pew Forum, # 28 Exhibit 27 − State Dept Country Report, # 29Exhibit 28 − DHS, # 30 Exhibit 29 − DOJ Iraqi Kentucky, # 31 Exhibit 30 − Cato,# 32 Exhibit 31 − Lawfare, # 33 Exhibit 32 − Brennan Center, # 34 Exhibit 33 −Letter Former Officials on March 6 EO, # 35 Exhibit 34 − Trump delays newtravel ban after well−reviewed speech − CNN Politics, # 36 Exhibit 35 − Familieshoping to make the U.S., # 37 Exhibit 36 − Trump Muslim ban is tearing apart
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 52 of 64
families, # 38 Exhibit 37 − Children and Refugees Who Planned Medical Care inthe US Stuck After Trump Executive Order − Health News − ABC News Radio, #39 Exhibit 38 − Trump's Travel Ban, Aimed at Terrorists, Has Blocked Doctors −The New York Times, # 40 Certificate of Service)(Kacprowski, Nickolas) Modified on
docket title text on 3/14/2017 (ecs, ). (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 199 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE.Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/14/2017. Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice Granted : 1) Seth D. Fiur [doc. no. 177 ]; 2) Steven E. Obus [doc.no. 178 ]; 3) Tiffany M. Woo[doc. no. 179 ]; and 4) Terrance J. Nolan [doc. no. 180 ] for partyAmicus Curiae New York University. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 200 ORDER Approving request for Media Blogging on 03/15/2017 as to representativeLiz Barney of The Guardian.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on03/14/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 201 MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by T.A..(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Certificate of Service)(Iwao, Regan) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 202 MEMORANDUM re 98 MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief in Supportof Plaintiffs Brief of the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, JayHirabayashi, Holly Yasui, Karen Korematsu, Civil Rights Organizations, andNational Bar Associations of Color, as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs;Certificate of Service filed by Asian American Legal Defense And Education Fund(AALDEF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Asian Law Caucus), Asian Americans Advancing Justice(Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Chicago), Asian AmericansAdvancing Justice (Los Angeles), Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality,Jay Hirabayashi, Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA), Japanese AmericanCitizens League, Honolulu Chapter (JACL Honolulu), Karen Korematsu,LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Inc., National Bar Association, South Asian BarAssociation of North America (SABA North America), Holly Yasui. (Attachments:# 1 Certificate of Service)(Ing, Louise) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 203 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Leave To File Brief on Behalf of New YorkUniversity as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for TemporaryRestraining Order; Exhibit A (Proposed Brief); Certificate of Service Claire WongBlack appearing for Amicus New York University (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A −Brief, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 204 MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Brief ofAmicus Curiae of the Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center in Supportof Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order; Certificate of WordCount; Certificate of Service filed by Roderick and Solange MacArthur JusticeCenter. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Word Count, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Minkin, David) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 205 NOTICE of Appearance by Margery S. Bronster on behalf of TechnologyCompanies and Other Businesses on behalf of Technology Companies and OtherBusinesses. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Bronster, Margery) (Entered:03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 206 NOTICE of Appearance by Melinda M Weaver on behalf of TechnologyCompanies and Other Businesses on behalf of Technology Companies and OtherBusinesses. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Weaver, Melinda) (Entered:
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 53 of 64
03/14/2017 207 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice [Robert A. Atkins] Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843890.Margery S. Bronster appearing for Amicus Technology Companiesand Other Businesses (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Bronster, Margery) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 208 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice [Andrew J. Ehrlich] Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843891.Margery S. Bronster appearing for Amicus Technology Companiesand Other Businesses (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Bronster, Margery) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 209 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice [Pietro J. Signoracci] Filing fee $ 300, receipt number0975−1843894.Margery S. Bronster appearing for Amicus Technology Companiesand Other Businesses (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Bronster, Margery) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 210 EO: The Court grants 185 Motion For Leave To Add Additional Amici To AmiciCuriae Interfaith Coalition's Amicus Brief and 203 Motion For Leave To File BriefOn Behalf Of New York University As Amicus Curiae In Support of Plaintiffs'Motion For Temporary Restraining Order. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 211 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of 65 Plaintiff'sMotion for a Temporary Restraining Order] Margery S. Bronster appearing forAmicus Technology Companies and Other Businesses (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit1_proposed Amici Curiae Brief, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bronster, Margery)(Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 212 MEMORANDUM in Support of 65 Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary RestrainingOrder filed by New York University. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 213 EO: On 3/14/17, Pietro J. Signoracci filed a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [Doc.No. 209]. The Court finds that the Motion satisfies the requirements set forth inRule 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the U.S. District Court for theDistrict of Hawaii. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion and will permitMr. Signoracci to appear before this Court in this action.
(MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG)(chang1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this documentelectronically at the e−mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by firstclass mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/14/2017 214 EO: On 3/14/17, Robert A. Atkins [Doc. No. 207] and Andrew J. Ehrlich [Doc.No. 208] filed Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court finds that the Motionssatisfy the requirements set forth in Rule 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice forthe U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. Accordingly, the Court GRANTSthe Motions and hereby permits Messrs. Atkins and Ehrlich to appear before thisCourt in this action.
(MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG)(chang1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this documentelectronically at the e−mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 54 of 64
class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/14/2017)
03/15/2017 215 EO: The Court grants 65 Motion For Leave To File Brief Of Amici CuriaeTechnology Companies And Other Businesses In Support Of Plaintiffs' Motion ForA Temporary Restraining Order. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 216 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging as to representative BarbaraTanabe of New Your Times on 3/15/2017.Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 03/15/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 217 MEMORANDUM re 215 Order on Motion for Leave to File, Link,,,, 65 MOTIONfor Temporary Restraining Order [Amici Curiae Brief in Opposition Support ofPlaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order] filed by TechnologyCompanies and Other Businesses. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A_(List ofTechnology Companies and Other Businesses), # 2 Certificate ofService)(Bronster, Margery) Modified on 3/15/2017 (emt, ). (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 218 MEMORANDUM in Support re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Orderfiled by State of Illinois. (Franklin, David) (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 219 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER65 .Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/15/2017. (ecs, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Main Document 219 replaced on3/22/2017) (mta, ). (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 220 EP: Hearing held on 65 Plaintiffs' Motion For Temporary Restraining Order. Oralarguments heard. Motion taken under Advisement. Court to issue a written order.(Court Reporter Gloria Bediamol) (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 221 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Technology Companies and Other Businessesidentifying Other Affiliate Tripadvisor LLC, Other Affiliate Airbnb, Inc., OtherAffiliate AltSchool, PBC, Other Affiliate Ampush LLC, Other Affiliate Appboy,Inc., Other Affiliate Appnexus, Inc., Other Affiliate Azavea, Other AffiliateCareZone, Inc., Other Affiliate Chegg, Inc., Other Affiliate Cloudera, Inc., OtherAffiliate Color Genomics, Inc., Other Affiliate Copia Institute, Other AffiliateDoorDash, Other Affiliate Dropbox, Inc., Other Affiliate Electronic Arts Inc.,Other Affiliate EquityZen Inc., Other Affiliate Evernote Corporation, OtherAffiliate Flipboard, Other Affiliate General Assembly Space, Inc., Other AffiliateGlassdoor, Inc., Other Affiliate Greenhouse Software, Inc., Other Affiliate IDEO,Other Affiliate Imgur, Inc., Other Affiliate Indiegogo, Inc., Other Affiliate KargoGlobal, Inc., Other Affiliate Kickstarter, PBC, Other Affiliate Light, Other AffiliateLinden Research, Inc. d/b/a Linden Lab, Other Affiliate Lithium Technologies,Inc., Other Affiliate Lyft, Inc., Other Affiliate Lytro, Inc., Other Affiliate MapboxInc., Other Affiliate Marin Software Incorporated, Other Affiliate Meetup, Inc.,Other Affiliate Memebox Corporation, Other Affiliate MongoDB, Inc., Other
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 55 of 64
Affiliate NetApp, Inc., Other Affiliate Patreon, Inc., Other Affiliate Pinterest, Inc.,Other Affiliate Postmates Inc., Other Affiliate Quora, Inc., Other AffiliateRealNetworks, Inc., Other Affiliate RetailMeNot, Inc., Other Affiliate RocketLawyer Incorporated, Other Affiliate Shutterstock, Inc., Other Affiliate Square,Inc., Other Affiliate Strava, Inc., Other Affiliate SugarCRM, Other AffiliateSunrun, Inc., Other Affiliate Turo, Inc., Other Affiliate Twilio Inc., Other AffiliateUdacity, Inc., Other Affiliate Upwork, Other Affiliate Warby Parker, OtherAffiliate Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Other Affiliate Work &Co, Other Affiliate YCombinator Management, LLC, Other Affiliate Zendesk, Inc. for TechnologyCompanies and Other Businesses.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Bronster, Margery) (Entered: 03/15/2017)
03/15/2017 222 MOTION re 217 Memorandum, [Motion for Leave to Include Additional Amici toAmici Curiae Technology Companies and Other Businesses' Amicus Brief]Margery S. Bronster appearing for Amicus Technology Companies and OtherBusinesses (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Bronster, Margery) (Entered:03/15/2017)
03/16/2017 223 EO: The Court grants 222 Motion For Leave To Include Additional Amici ToAmici Curiae Technology Companies and Other Businesses' Amicus Brief [DktNo. 271]. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/16/2017)
03/16/2017 225 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Technology Companies and Other Businessesidentifying Other Affiliate Uber Technologies, Inc., Other Affiliate Affirm, Inc.,Other Affiliate Ancestry.com, LLC, Other Affiliate AppDynamics, Inc., OtherAffiliate Codecademy, Other Affiliate Knotel, Other Affiliate Squarespace, Inc.,Other Affiliate Thumbtack, Inc., Other Affiliate Via for Technology Companiesand Other Businesses.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Bronster,Margery) (Entered: 03/16/2017)
03/16/2017 233 MOTION for Leave to File a Brief Amicus Curiae, Raising Political QuestionNonjusticiability, from Professor Victor Williams of the America First LawyersAssociation, in Support of President Donald J. Trump − by Amicus VictorWilliams.(Attachments: # 1 Transmittal Letter dated March 13, 2017)(emt, ) (Entered: 03/20/2017)
03/17/2017 227 MOTION for Clarification re 219 Order on Motion for TRO, Brad P. Rosenbergappearing for Defendants John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S.Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States ofAmerica (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion forClarification, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Rosenberg, Brad) Modified on 3/20/2017 (emt, ).
(Entered: 03/17/2017)
03/18/2017 228 OPPOSITION to 227 MOTION for Clarification of TRO re 219 Order on Motionfor TRO, filed by State of Hawaii. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Katyal, Neal) Modified on 3/20/2017 (emt, ). (Entered: 03/18/2017)
03/19/2017 229 EO: The Court is in receipt of the Federal Defendants' Motion for Clarification ofTRO. Dkt. No. 227. That Motion essentially asks whether the Court's March 15,2017 Temporary Restraining Order was intended to apply to Sections 2 and 6 ofthe Executive Order. The Motion, in other words, asks the Court to make adistinction that the Federal Defendants' previous briefs and arguments never did.As important, there is nothing unclear about the scope of the Court's order. SeeDkt. No. 219 (TRO) at 42 ("Defendants... are hereby enjoined from enforcing orimplementing Sections 2 and 6 of the Executive Order across the Nation."). TheFederal Defendants' Motion is DENIED. (JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON)(watson1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 56 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/19/2017)
03/19/2017 230 EO: In light of the Court's TRO directing the parties to submit a certain "stipulatedbriefing and hearing schedule," the parties' briefs relating to the FederalDefendants' Motion for Clarification of TRO, and the Court's EO regarding thesame (Dkt. No. 229), the parties are further directed to advise the Court whether astipulated path has been reached regarding proceedings before this Courtconcerning a possible extension of the Court's TRO. If a status conference isnecessary, the parties are requested to contact Tammy Kimura, CourtroomManager, forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON)(watson1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/19/2017)
03/19/2017 231 Errata re 228 Response to Mot. to Clarify. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of ServiceCOS for Errata)(Marie−Iha, Deirdre) (Entered: 03/19/2017)
03/19/2017 232 Corporate Disclosure Statement by New York University. (Attachments: # 1Certificate of Service)(Black, Claire) (Entered: 03/19/2017)
03/20/2017 235 Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiff State ofHawaii (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/20/2017)
03/20/2017 236 EO: The Court is in receipt of the parties' Joint Motion For Entry Of ProposedBriefing Schedule Order For Plaintiffs' Forthcoming Motion to Convert TemporaryRestraining Order to a Preliminary Injunction. Dkt. No. 235. The Court enters thefollowing briefing schedule: Plaintiffs shall file their Motion to Convert TemporaryRestraining Order to a Preliminary Injunction ("Motion") by 9:30 A.M. H.S.T. onTuesday, March 21, 2017. The Government shall file its Opposition by 9:30 A.M.H.S.T. on Friday, March 24, 2017. Plaintiffs shall file their Reply by 9:30 A.M.H.S.T. on Saturday, March 25, 2017. The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs'forthcoming Motion at 9:30 A.M. H.S.T. on Wednesday, March 29, 2017. Counselmay participate by phone by notifying Judge Watson's Courtroom Manager byTuesday, March 28, 2017 and providing the phone number where counsel may bereached at the time of the hearing. The Court will contact the parties via phone atthe time of the hearing. The Court advises that the hearing date/time may bechanged, or vacated, upon review of the briefs. Per the parties' stipulation, theCourt's Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") of March 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 219)shall remain in place until such time as the Court rules on whether the TRO shouldbe converted to a preliminary injunction or until otherwise ordered by the Court. ITIS SO ORDERED.(JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(watson1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/20/2017)
03/20/2017 237 MOTION to Intervene ("Tertius Interveniens Notice of Lack of Standing of Stateof Hawaii to Challenge President's Executive Order (Travel Ban)); (FRCVP Rule20(a)(2)(B) &28 USC 1397)" − by Intervenor Eric Richard Eleson.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Certificate of Service, # 8 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) (Entered: 03/21/2017)
03/21/2017 238 MOTION to Convert Temporary Restraining Order to Preliminary Injunction NealKatyal appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2Exhibit Proposed Order, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered:03/21/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 57 of 64
03/21/2017 239 Declaration re 238 MOTION to Convert Temporary Restraining Order toPreliminary Injunction of Neal K. Katyal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 ExhibitB, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/21/2017)
03/21/2017 240 EO: The Court is in receipt of a Motion to Intervene entitled, ''Tertius InterveniensNotice of Lack of Standing of State of Hawaii to Challenge President's ExecutiveOrder (Travel Ban)'' filed by Eric Richard Eleson. Dkt. No 237. The Motion isDENIED. The Motion identifies no statutory right to intervene within the meaningof either Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) or 24(b). Moreover, the disposition of this action willnot impair or impede Eleson's ability to protect his rights or interests. Eleson has noclaim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or factsufficient for the Court to exercise its discretion in favor of intervention. Finally, tothe extent Eleson seeks permissive joinder pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a)(2)(B),the Motion is likewise without merit. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICKK. WATSON)(tl, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/21/2017)
03/21/2017 241 Mikki the Mime's MOTION to Intervene Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) and (b) −by Intervenor Joseph Camp.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Transmittal Letter, #5 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) (Entered: 03/22/2017)
03/22/2017 242 EO: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/2017 is hereby continued to09:30AM on 4/18/2017 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG.Judge Chang is on unavailable status on 4/3/2017. (MAGISTRATE JUDGEKEVIN S.C. CHANG)(lls, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/22/2017)
03/22/2017 243 EO: The Court is in receipt of a Motion to Intervene filed by Mikki the Mime. Dkt.No 241. The Motion is DENIED. The Motion identifies no statutory right tointervene within the meaning of either Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) or 24(b). Moreover, thedisposition of this action will not impair or impede Movant's ability to protect herrights or interests. Finally, Movant has no claim or defense that shares with themain action a common question of law or fact sufficient for the Court to exerciseits discretion in favor of intervention. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICKK. WATSON)(tl, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/22/2017)
03/23/2017 244 NOTICE of Limited Appearance by Robert M. Kohn and Nicolette Winter onbehalf of City and County of Honolulu on behalf of City and County of Honolulu.(Kohn, Robert) Modified on 3/24/2017 −− The Notice of Appearance is only signed by Robert M. Kohn but
states that both Robert M. Kohn and Nicolette Winter are making an appearance on behalf of the City and County ofHonolulu. (emt, ). (Entered: 03/23/2017)
03/23/2017 245 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice ;Declaration of Counsel; Proposed Order GrantingMotion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Benna Ruth Solomon Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1848080.Robert M. Kohn appearing for Amicus City and County ofHonolulu (Kohn, Robert) (Entered: 03/23/2017)
03/23/2017 246 (refer to docket entry 247 ):MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Chicago, Los Angeles, New York,Philadelphia, and Other Major Cities and Counties As Amici Curiae in Support ofPlaintiffs' Motion to Convert the Temporary Restraining Order to a Preliminary
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 58 of 64
Injunction (Dkt. 238) Robert M. Kohn appearing for Amicus City and County ofHonolulu (Kohn, Robert)DOCKET TEXT ENTRY modified on 3/23/2017:Motion to be re−filed to include the signature of filing party Robert Kohn and tore−submit the document in separate pdf−attachments. (afc) Modified on 3/24/2017 (emt, ).
(Entered: 03/23/2017)
03/23/2017 247 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadephia,and Other Major Cities and Counties as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs'Motion to Convert the Temporary Restraining Order to a Preliminary Injunction(Dkt 238) Robert M. Kohn appearing for Amicus City and County of Honolulu(Attachments: # 1 Supplement Proposed Amici Curiae Brief, # 2 Appendix, # 3Certificate of Service)(Kohn, Robert) (Entered: 03/23/2017)
03/23/2017 248 EO: The Court hereby grants 233 the Motion For Leave to File a Brief AmicusCuriae, Raising Political Question of Nonjusticiability From Professor VictorWilliams of the America First Lawyers Association, in Support of PresidentDonald Trump and 246 the Motion For Leave To File Brief of Chicago, LosAngeles, New York, Philadelphia, and Other Major Cities and Counties As AmiciCuriae in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Convert the Temporary RestrainingOrder to a Preliminary Injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON)(tl, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/23/2017)
03/24/2017 249 EO: On 3/23/17, Benna Ruth Solomon filed a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.Doc. No. 245. The Court finds that the Motion satisfies the requirements set forthin Rule 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the U.S. District Court for theDistrict of Hawaii. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion 245 and willpermit Ms. Solomon to appear before this Court in this action. (MAGISTRATEJUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG)(chang1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/24/2017)
03/24/2017 250 RAISING POLITICAL QUESTION NONJUSTICIABILITY, AMICUS CURIAEBRIEF from Professor Victor Williams, of the America First Lawyers Association,in Support of President Donald Trump re 238 − by Victor Williams, on behalf ofAmerica First Lawyers Association. Note: Permission to file the amicus curiae brief was granted pursuant to 248 Minute Order.(emt, ) (Entered: 03/24/2017)
03/24/2017 251 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 238 MOTION to Convert TemporaryRestraining Order to Preliminary Injunction filed by John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson,Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department ofState, United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Sarsour v. Trump Slip Opinion,# 2 Washington v. Trump Order Containing Dissents)(Rosenberg, Brad) (Entered:03/24/2017)
03/25/2017 252 REPLY to Response to Motion re 238 MOTION to Convert TemporaryRestraining Order to Preliminary Injunction filed by Ismail Elshikh, State ofHawaii. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Word Count, # 2 Certificate ofService)(Katyal, Neal) (Entered: 03/25/2017)
03/25/2017 253 Declaration re 252 Reply to Response to Motion, Supplemental Declaration ofNeal K. Katyal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D (DHS Fact Sheet), # 2 Exhibit E(DHS Q# 3 Exhibit F (N.Y. Times Article), # 4 Certificate of Service)(Katyal,Neal) (Entered: 03/25/2017)
03/27/2017 254 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad A. Readler on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 59 of 64
Department of State, United States of America on behalf of John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America. (Readler, Chad) (Entered:03/27/2017)
03/28/2017 255 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice [G. Eric Brunstad, Jr.] Filing fee $ 300, receiptnumber 0975−1849280.Lisa W. Munger appearing for Amicus HIAS(Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Counsel [G. Eric Brunstad, Jr.], # 2 [Proposed]Order Granting Mtn to Appear PHV [G. Eric Brunstad, Jr.], # 3 Certificate ofService)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 256 ORDER Approving Request for Media Blogging on 03/29/2017 as to CNNrepresentative Traci Tamura. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on3/28/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 257 ORDER Approving Blogging request on 03/29/2017 for Daily Kos representativeJoyce M. Brown. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/28/2017. (apg,dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 258 NOTICE of Filing of Declaration of Lawrence E. Bartlett by John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America re 238 MOTION to ConvertTemporary Restraining Order to Preliminary Injunction , 251 Memorandum inOpposition to Motion . (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lawrence E. Bartlett, # 2Certificate of Service)(Rosenberg, Brad) Modified on 3/29/2017 (emt, ). (Entered:03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 259 EO: On 3/28/17, G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. filed a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 255 .Although Mr. Brunstad satisfies the requirements set forth in Local Rule 83.1(e),he failed to provide a response to paragraph 7 of his declaration, which asks thatcounsel identify the courts in which he or she is a registered CM/ECF user.Accordingly, the Motion is deficient and it is DENIED without prejudice.(MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG)(chang1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 260 SUPPLEMENT by HIAS in Response to 259 EO Denying w/out Prejudice 255Mtn to Appear PHV [G. Eric Brunstad, Jr.]. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration ofCounsel [G. Eric Brunstad, Jr.], # 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Mtn for PHV [G.Eric Brunstad, Jr.], # 3 Certificate of Service)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 261 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of HIAS as Amicus Curiae in Support ofPlaintiffs' Motion to Convert Temporary Restraining Order to a PreliminaryInjunction Lisa W. Munger appearing for Amicus HIAS (Attachments: # 1Attachment [Brief of Amicus Curiae ISO Plaintiffs' Mtn to Convert TRO to a PI], #2 Certificate of Service)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 262 EO: On 3/28/17, G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. filed a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Doc.No. 260. The Court finds that the Motion satisfies the requirements set forth inRule 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the U.S. District Court for theDistrict of Hawaii. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion and will permitMr. Brunstad to appear before this Court in this action. (MAGISTRATE JUDGEKEVIN S.C. CHANG)(chang1)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 60 of 64
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 263 ORDER Approving request for Media Blogging on 03/29/2017 as to Reuters Newsrepresentative Roy Hunter Haskings. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSONon 03/28/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 264 ORDER Approving Blogging Request for 03/29/2017 as to Hawaii News NowRepresentatives Jim Mendoza and Ian Scheuring. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K.WATSON on 03/28/2017. (apg, dist)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 265 EO: The Court grants 261 Motion For Leave To File Brief Of HIAS As AmicusCuriae In Support Of Plaintiffs' Motion To Convert Temporary Restraining OrderTo A Preliminary Injunction. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/28/2017)
03/28/2017 266 (Notice of Filing); MOTION for Leave to Appear Amicus Curiae − by AmicusLamar Christopher Chapman, III.(Attachments: # 1 Proposed Brief of Amicus, # 2 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) (Entered: 03/29/2017)
03/29/2017 267 MEMORANDUM re 238 MOTION to Convert Temporary Restraining Order toPreliminary Injunction [Brief of HIAS Amicus Curiae in Support of 238 filed byHIAS. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Munger, Lisa) (Entered:03/29/2017)
03/29/2017 268 EP: Hearing held on 238 Plaintiffs' Motion To Convert Temporary RestrainingOrder To A Preliminary Injunction.
Oral arguments heard. Motion taken under Advisement. Court to issue a writtenorder. (Court Reporter Gloria Bediamol) (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/29/2017)
03/29/2017 269 EO: Court denies 266 Motion For Leave To Appear Amicus Curiae and MotionFor Leave To File Amicus Brief filed by Lamar C. Chapman III. (JUDGEDERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/29/2017)
03/29/2017 COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service − a copy of 269 Order on Motion For LeaveTo Appear Amicus Curiae and Motion For Leave To File Amicus Brief filed by
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 61 of 64
Lamar C. Chapman III has been served by First Class Mail to Mr. Chapman at theaddress located on mailing documentation on 3/29/2017.Registered Participants ofCM/ECF received the document electronically at the e−mail address listed on theNotice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (tyk) (Entered: 03/29/2017)
03/29/2017 270 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONVERT TEMPORARY RESTRAININGORDER TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re 238 −Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/29/2017."It is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that:Defendants and all their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, andattorneys, and persons in active concert or participation with them, are herebyenjoined from enforcing or implementing Sections 2 and 6 of the Executive Orderacross the Nation. Enforcement of these provisions in all places, including theUnited States, at all United States borders and ports of entry, and in the issuance ofvisas is prohibited, pending further orders from this Court.No security bond is required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c).The Court declines to stay this ruling or hold it in abeyance should an appeal of thisorder be filed."(emt, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/29/2017)
03/30/2017 271 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 219 Order on Motion for TRO,, 270 Order onMotion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,,, by John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J.Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, UnitedStates of America. (Rosenberg, Brad)Modified on 3/30/2017 9CCA NO. 17−15589(emt, ). (Entered: 03/30/2017)
03/30/2017 272 USCA Case Number 17−15589 for 271 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S.Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rex Tillerson, JohnF. Kelly, United States of America, Donald J. Trump.(emt, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Parties served by Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Entered: 03/30/2017)
03/30/2017 273 Attorney Appeal Packet re 271 Notice of Appeal filed by by John F. Kelly, RexTillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America, 9CCA NO. 17−15589.(Attachments: # 1 Notice of Appeal, # 2 Instructions for Civil Appeals, # 3Additional Instructions for Transcript Designation and Ordering Form, # 4 LetterRe: Court Reporters, # 5 Transcript Designation and Ordering Form, # 6 DocketSheet)(emt, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 03/30/2017)
03/31/2017 274 TRANSCRIPT Designation and Ordering Form by John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson,Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department ofState, United States of America (Attachments: # 1 Certificate ofService)(Rosenberg, Brad) (Entered: 03/31/2017)
03/31/2017 275 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings Pltf. Mt. for TRO held on March 15, 2017, − beforeJudge Derrick K. Watson. Court Reporter/Transcriber Gloria T. Bediamol,Telephone number (808) 541−2060. 90−Day Transcript Restriction: PACERaccess to filed transcripts is restricted for 90 days from the file date to permitredaction of personal identifiers. Citations to restricted transcripts in fileddocuments must be limited to those portions of the proceedings that are relevant
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 62 of 64
and in need of judicial review. Attaching restricted transcripts, in their entirety, tofiled documents should be limited to situations with specific need. Transcript maybe viewed at the court public terminal or ordered through the Court Reporter beforethe deadline for Release of Transcript. Redaction Request due 4/18/2017. RedactedTranscript Deadline set for 4/28/2017. Release of Transcript Restriction set for6/26/2017. pp. 55. ([email protected]) (Entered: 03/31/2017)
03/31/2017 276 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings Mt. to convert TRO to PI held on March 29, 2017,− before Judge Derrick K. Watson. Court Reporter/Transcriber Gloria T.Bediamol, Telephone number (808) 541−2060. 90−Day Transcript Restriction:PACER access to filed transcripts is restricted for 90 days from the file date topermit redaction of personal identifiers. Citations to restricted transcripts in fileddocuments must be limited to those portions of the proceedings that are relevantand in need of judicial review. Attaching restricted transcripts, in their entirety, tofiled documents should be limited to situations with specific need. Transcript maybe viewed at the court public terminal or ordered through the Court Reporter beforethe deadline for Release of Transcript. Redaction Request due 4/18/2017. RedactedTranscript Deadline set for 4/28/2017. Release of Transcript Restriction set for6/26/2017. pp. 45. ([email protected]) (Entered: 03/31/2017)
04/03/2017 277 Joint MOTION to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Resolution ofDefendants' Appeal Brad P. Rosenberg appearing for Defendants John F. Kelly,Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.Department of State, United States of America (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order,# 2 Certificate of Service)(Rosenberg, Brad) (Entered: 04/03/2017)
04/03/2017 278 ORDER of USCA as to 271 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of State,U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rex Tillerson, John F. Kelly, UnitedStates of America, Donald J. Trump, 9CCA NO. 17−15589:"Appellants' unopposed motion to expedite the briefing and consideration of amotion to stay and to expedite the briefing and consideration of the merits of thispreliminary injunction appeal (Docket Entry No. 12) is granted.The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows:the opening brief and the motion for a stay pending appeal are due April 7, 2017;the answering brief and the response to the motion for a stay pending appeal aredue April 21, 2017; and the optional reply brief and the reply in support of themotion for a stay pending appeal are due April 28, 2017. Any amicus briefs are dueApril 21, 2017.The parties' request for expedited argument is granted. This case shall be heard onthe calendar for May 2017, taking into account the limited dates the parties haveadvised they are available for argument."(emt, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Parties served by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Entered: 04/03/2017)
04/03/2017 279 ORDER re 277 − Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/3/2017."All deadlines in this case, including the Defendants' deadline to file a response tothe Second Amended Complaint, the parties' deadline to file a SchedulingConference Statement pursuant to Rule 16.2(b), and the deadline to hold aconference pursuant to Rule 26.1(a), are hereby STAYED. The Court also herebyCONTINUES the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference that had been set for April 18,2017.It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit, within fourteen days ofthe final disposition of appellate proceedings, a joint status report proposingthe schedule for any further proceedings in this matter." Motion terminated: 277 Joint MOTION to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Resolution of Defendants' Appeal
filed by U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rex Tillerson, John F. Kelly, United Statesof America, Donald J. Trump.
(emt, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 04/03/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 63 of 64
04/03/2017 280 EO: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2017 before Magistrate JudgeKevin Chang is hereby vacated. Refer to [ECF No. 279] Order issued by JudgeDerrick K. Watson. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG)(lls, )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e−mail addresslisted on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications wereserved by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Entered: 04/03/2017)
Case: 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC As of: 04/06/2017 09:16 AM HST 64 of 64