Top Banner
Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates •UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) •Ly = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) •Far IR = bolometric (covering factor?) •Radio continuum (synchrotron) = empirical (radio – FIR correlation?) •Radio free-free/RRLs = ionizing photons (sensitivity, spectral confusion?) •All relate mostly to massive stars (> 5 M_sun) => total SFR depends on extrapolation of IMF, and temporal behavior
36

Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly = ionizing.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7)

Methods for deriving star formation rates

•UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?)

•Ly = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?)

•Far IR = bolometric (covering factor?)

•Radio continuum (synchrotron) = empirical (radio – FIR correlation?)

•Radio free-free/RRLs = ionizing photons (sensitivity, spectral confusion?)

•All relate mostly to massive stars (> 5 M_sun) => total SFR depends on extrapolation of IMF, and temporal behavior

Page 2: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Cosmic (proper) time

Page 3: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Radio-FIR correlation: tightest correlation in

extragalactic astronomy

Separating FF – Synch is difficult

Synch.

Free-free

Thermal dust

M82

Page 4: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

SKA in context

z=8

EVLA

Page 5: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Cosmic ‘background’: ½ starlight reprocessed by dust

Page 6: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Evolution of space density of luminous QSOs (Fan et al. 2003)

Madau-Lilly plot: evolution of cosmic star formation rate

density

Page 7: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Galaxy populations at high redshift (2 < z < 7)

•Radio galaxies: only z > 0.5 galaxies before 90’s

•UV dropouts/Ly-break: broadband colors

•Ly : narrow band imaging

•Submm: (sub)mm bolometer camera imaging

•QSO Hosts: HST, (sub)mm

•QSO absorption lines: metalicity evolution, parent galaxies

•z=0.3 to 2: EROs, faint blue, Butcher-Oemler, Jy radio sources, ISO

•GRB hosts

•Pop III stars: early reionization by 100 M_sun stars in minihalos at z = 20?

Page 8: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

z = 5.2 2000

10kpc

High z radio galaxies (L_1.4 > 1e28 W/Hz)

10kpc

z=0.057 1954

z=0.49 1980

z=3.8 1990

Page 9: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

K-z relation: HzRGs = Giant Ellipticals

z>8 radio galaxies?

Page 10: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Alignment effect: Jet-induced star formation?

Clumpy morphologies => forming ellipticals?

1138-262 z=2.2

Page 11: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Alignement effect: Radio-Xray

Radio-Lyhalo

18kpc

Page 12: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Clustering on Mpc scales around HzRGs (1138-262 z=2.2) => protoclusters?

Page 13: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Dusty radio galaxies at high z?

Overdensity of submm galaxies?

Page 14: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

UV dropouts/Ly break (Ly

Page 15: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.
Page 16: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Star formation rates in Ly break galaxies

Extinction uncorrected

corrected

Page 17: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Correlation between extinction and SFR => L_UV is independent of SFR

Page 18: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Ly break galaxies = highly biased (ie. clustered) galaxy formation

Page 19: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Ly break galaxies with Ly halos

Page 20: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

SUBMM galaxies: dust obscured galaxy formation

HDF - optical HDF – 850 m

Page 21: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Dust obscured star formation dominates at z>2?

Submm galaxies: L_FIR = 1e12 to 1e13 L_sun

=> SFR = 100 to 1000 M_sun /yr

M_dust = 1e8-9 M_sun

Page 22: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Magic of submm

350 GHz

250 GHz

Page 23: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Brightest mm source in HDF:

K = 23.5

Page 24: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Radio photometric redshifts: two

colors, or ‘drop-outs’

Page 25: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Redshift distribution

Page 26: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Next step: photometric redshifts

Page 27: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

CO emission => M(H_2) = 1e10-11 M_sun

Page 28: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Submm galaxies

Page 29: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

QSO host galaxies

•Most low z spheroidal galaxies have SMBH

•M_BH = 0.002 M_bulge

=> ‘Causal connection between SMBH and spheroidal galaxy formationn’ (Gebhardt et al. 2002)?

Page 30: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

30% of luminous QSOs have S_250 > 2 mJy

L_FIR > 7e12 M_sun

Dust heating: starburst or AGN?

2322+1944

z=6.4 S_250=5.5mJy

Page 31: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Radio-to-IR SED = M82

Page 32: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

CO(1-0) w. VLA:

L_FIR = 3e13 L_sun

M(H_2) = 1e11 M_sun

Page 33: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

A Molecular Einstein Ring: VLA 45 GHz observations of CO2-1 emission from the gravitationally

lensed QSO 2322+1944 at z=4.12 (Carilli et al. 2003)

Keck Rband

VLA CO2-1

2”

Page 34: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Using the gravitational lens to probe sub-kpc scales in 2322+1944: A starburst disk surrounding a SMBH => coeval SMBH – galaxy formation?

Optical QSO

Starburst disk: molecular gas, dust, radio continuum

Page 35: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Starbursts in QSO host galaxies?•30% of luminous QSOs (M_B < -27) have L_FIR = 1e13 L_sun (independent of redshift)

•Z= 2 sample: All L_FIR luminous QSOs detected at 1.4 GHz, and in all cases ‘q’ consistent with star forming galaxy (2.3 +/- 0.3)

Page 36: Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.

Questions

•Relationships between different high z galaxy types?

•Halos masses and end-products (spirals, ellipticals)?

•Is > 1000 M_sun/yr possible, sustainable (Heckman limit)?

•IMF: top heavy? Star formation in extreme environments (P=100xISM)? Timescales?

•Dust formation at z>6: >1e8 M_sun in < 0.7 Gyr?

•What fraction of high z galaxy formation is dust-obscured?

•Submm galaxies – redshift distribution?

•radio – FIR correlation: mechanism? vs. redshift?

•M- relation – coeval SMBH and galaxy formation?

•QSO dust heating: star formation or AGN?

•L_FIR from S_250?

•X = gas mass to CO luminosity conversion? L_FIR to dust mass conversion?

•Pop III stars, minihalos, and first luminous objects: role of radio astronomy?