Stanford Wave Induced Particle Precipitation (WIPP) Code Prajwal Kulkarni U.S. Inan, T.F. Bell March 4, 2008 Space, Telecommunications and Radioscience (STAR) Laboratory Stanford University Stanford, CA
Jan 03, 2016
Stanford Wave Induced Particle Precipitation (WIPP) Code
Prajwal KulkarniU.S. Inan, T.F. Bell
March 4, 2008
Space, Telecommunications and Radioscience (STAR) Laboratory
Stanford UniversityStanford, CA
2
Outline
1. Motivation
2. Ground-based VLF Transmitters
3. Wave-Particle Interaction
4. Simulation Results
5. Conclusions
3
Motivation and Procedure
Resonant interactions with waves are responsible for the acceleration and loss of radiation belt electrons.
In the inner belt and slot region, different types of waves (whistlers, hiss, VLF transmitters) are important drivers of precipitation. Abel and Thorne [1998a]
Inan et al. [1984] used a test particle approach to calculate precipitation zones around existing ground-based VLF transmitters Considered only ducted propagation
We calculate the precipitation signatures induced by the NPM, NWC, NLK, NAU and NAA ground-based VLF transmitters as well as by hypothetical transmitters Utilize the Stanford 2D VLF Raytracing program Calculate Landau damping along raypath [Bell et al., 2002]. Calculate energetic electron precipitation based on method of Bortnik et al.
[2005a, 2005b]. We focus on > 100 keV electrons
4
Transmitter Parameters
L = 2.75f = 24.8 kHz192 kW
L = 1.15f = 21.4 kHz424 kW
L = 2.98f = 24.0 kHz1000 kW
L = 1.38f = 19.8 kHz1000 kW
L = 1.30f = 40.75 kHz100 kW
5
21.4 kHz 424 kW L = 1.15 21.4°
VLF Transmitters
6
No Magnetospheric Reflections
Wave frequency must be below the local lower hybrid resonance frequency, fLHR
fLHR generally below 13 kHz in inner magnetosphere
Increases at locations closer to the surface of the earth.
Ground based transmitters radiate frequencies above the fLHR and therefore do not MR
7
Wave-Particle Interaction
• H effectively determines electron resonant velocity• Higher frequency waves resonate with lower energy electrons• So which factor is most important: location, frequency, radiated power?
H: gyrofrequency: wave frequencykz: wave k-vector: relativistic gamma-factorvz: resonant electron velocity
8
Case Study
NAA: L = 2.98 (54.6o), 24.00 kHz, 1 MW NAU: L = 1.30 (28.6o), 40.75 kHz, 100 kW
Both at 100 kW, NAA location, equatorial interactions
Actual locations, 100 kWOff-equatorial interactions
Actual characteristicsBoth at 100 kWEquatorial Interactions
9
10
Role of Source Location
11
Role of Source Location: 100 keV
All transmitters at 1 MW radiated power
12
Role of Source Location: 1 MeV
All transmitters at 1 MW radiated power
13
Role of Radiated Power
14
Underlying Models
15
Conclusion
We have calculated > 100 keV energetic electron precipitation signatures that would be induced by five existing ground-based VLF transmitters NAA, NLK, NAU, NPM, NWC
NWC induces the strongest precipitation signature
Simulated several hypothetical transmitters distributed broadly in geomagnetic latitude and operating at a wide range of frequencies.
Investigated the relationship between transmitter location, operating frequency and radiated power H (source location) directly proportional to resonant energy inversely proportional to resonant energy Location, location, location!
Future work: compare predictions with data