Standards Based Middleware and Tools for the Coastal Sensor Web Surya Durbha, Roger King, Santhosh Rajender, Shruthi Bheemireddy, and Nicolas Younan, Geosystems Research Institute (GRI) Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University
22
Embed
Standards Based Middleware and Tools for the Coastal ......Coastal Sensor Web Enablement. Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) Heterogeneous . Network Sources (Various monitoring sensors) Decision
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Standards Based Middleware and Tools for the Coastal Sensor Web
Surya Durbha, Roger King, SanthoshRajender, Shruthi Bheemireddy, and
Nicolas Younan, Geosystems Research Institute (GRI)
Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University
Acknowledgement: This work is currently funded by the Northern Gulf Institute
(NGI)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Coastal Sensor Networks
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) (The U.S. contribution to the GOOS and GEOSS) Buoys and other ocean platforms
Presently national networks NDBC, GoMOOS, TAO, etc.
Data discovery and conversion problems due to Syntactic, structural, and semantic heterogeneity in
the datasets.
Ongoing implementation of a Services-driven Sensor Web Enablement framework for resolving these heterogeneity problems.
Coastal Sensor Web Enablement
Sensor Web Enablement (SWE)
Heterogeneous Network Sources
(Various monitoring sensors)
Decision Support Tools (monitoring, control, emergency response)
Web services (Sensor observation Service, O&M, etc.)
Encodings based on open standards
SWE Clients
DiscoveryAccessTaskingAlerts
Emergencies Support and Management
Risk & Vulnerability assessments
Storm Surge Visualization
Flood forecasting
Sensor Web Architecture
Cur
rent
Sys
tem
Sens
or W
eb E
nabl
emen
t(C
osem
War
e)
SensorML mapping<Sensor Group><TempSensors>
<Salinity sensors><…>
SensorML mapping<Sensor Group><wind direction sensor>
Example SPARQL Query (Scenario: “Find devices that can produce certain output variables”)
Ontology Mapping
NDBC GOMOOS
Source Ontology Target Ontology
Semi- automated tool for Ontologies Alignment
The architecture of the mapping approach
The hybrid approach, which we proposed is based on the machinelearning and name matching techniques.
We utilize the instance data in ontology concepts to enablemapping between concepts.
Support Vector Machines
wξ
wξ−
margin
Linearly separable case; only supportvectors (dark circled) are required todefine the optimally definedhyperplane.
Linearly nonseparable case; only support vectors (dark circled) are required to define the optimally defined hyperplane. Linear decision hyperplanes in nonlinearly separable data can be handled by including slack variables
Class +1
Class -1
= 2 / ||w||
Presenter
Presentation Notes
SVMs have often found to provide higher classification accuracies than other widely used pattern recognition techniques, such as maximum likelihood and the multilayer perceptron neural network classifiers. SVMs appear to be especially advantageous in the presence of heterogeneous classes for which only few training samples are available. The geometric margin between the two classes is given by the quantity 2/|| w||. The concept of margin is central in the SVM approach, since it is a measure of the generalization capability. The larger the margin, the higher the expected generalization. The optimal hyperplane can be determined as the solution of the convex quadratic programming problem. In order to handle non separable data, the concept of optimal separating hyperplane has been generalized as the solution that minimizes a cost function that expresses a combination of two criteria: margin minimization, and error minimization (to penalize the wrongly classified samples). A natural way to improve further the separation between two information classes consists in generalizing the above method to the category of nonlinear discriminant functions. Accordingly it is mapping the data through a proper nonlinear transformation into a higher dimensional feature space.
Semi-automated ontology mapping tool
Evalution Metrics
•Enable flexible mobile accessto distributed web resourcesfor advanced personalizationand localization features.• Automatic discovery andinvocation of web services•Universal Description Discoveryand Integration(UDDI) provides aregistry of businesses and webservices to describe serviceprofiles in human-readable way.
Semantic Matchmaking and Mobile Interface
•Android is a new andpromising mobile platformbased on the Linux operatingsystem provided by Google.
• Android is not just anotherJava-based mobile platform butactually the only platform thatadopts the results of the mobilemiddleware research.
Semantic Web Services
• Semantic interoperability is crucial for Web services providing additional features like knowledge-based, location or context aware information.
• Integration of semantic metadata and the Web services infrastructure results in a service named Semantic Web Services (SWS) that has well-defined semantics.
• OWL-S provides a language to describe actual Web services that can be discovered and then invoked using standards such as WSDL and SOAP in such a way that the descriptions can be interpreted by a computer system in an automated manner.
Ontology for Sensor Concepts and Service Advertisement Propagation.
•Exact: If Reqout and Advout are same. That is, if Reqout andAdvout both point to same concept say WaterTemperature ofthe ontology.•Plug- in: If Advout subsumes Reqout, then Advout can beplugged instead of Reqout. That is, if Advout points toWaterTemperature and Reqout points to SeaTemperature ofthe ontology (Figure 14).•Subsume: If Reqout subsumes Advout, then the provider mayor may not completely satisfy the requester.•fail: If there is no subsumption relation between Advout andReqout.