Standard vs. Law - LBCG€¦ · Honda Engineering North America, Inc. 24000 Honda Parkway, Marysville, OH 43040 [email protected] | } ISO 10218-1, 2011 Robot Manufacturers

Standard vs. Law

R. Todd Dickey Engineering Coordinator Honda Engineering North America, Inc. 24000 Honda Parkway, Marysville, OH 43040 [email protected] |

}  ISO 10218-1, 2011 ◦  Robot Manufacturers

}  ISO 10218-2, 2011 ◦  Robot System Integrators

}  ISO TS 15066, 2016 ◦  Collaborative robot guidance

}  ANSI/RIA R15.06-2012 ◦  Manufacturers and Integrators ◦  Cross references to US standards

}  CAN/CSA-Z434-14 ◦  Manufacturers and Integrators ◦  User requirements ◦  National deviations

}  ISO/TC 299 (formerly TC 184/SC2) ◦  24 Participating member countries �  Austria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark,

Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

◦  9 Observing member counties �  Belgium, Bulgaria, India, Israel, Norway, Pakistan,

Poland, Serbia, Slovakia

}  United States ◦  OSHA (via General Duty Clause)

}  Canada ◦  Ontario Ministry of Labor (PHSR)

}  European Union (and EFTA countries, plus Turkey) ◦  EU-OSHA

�  Machinery Directive (manufacture of machines) �  Product Directives (low voltage, EMC, ATEX) �  Work Equipment Directive (users of machines)

}  Japan ◦  Ministry of Labor

�  Enforcing Pressure and Force limits found in TS15066 }  India ◦  Bureau of Indian Standards

}  Korea ◦  Occupational Safety and Health Standards

}  All regulatory agencies strive to assure an employer furnish to each of its employees a place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm.

}  The following documents provide guidance on assessing risk

◦  ISO 12100 �  Specifies principles of risk assessment and risk reduction ◦  ISO 14121 �  Provides hazard analysis guidance ◦  ANSI B11.0 �  Also, specifies principles of risk assessment and risk

reduction �  Compliance with this standard will result in compliance with

ISO 12100 ◦  RIA TR R15.306 �  References ANSI B11.0 for process methodology, but has

specific robot application analysis tools (scoring)

}  Reducing risks through engineering controls ◦  ISO 13849 will produce the following: �  Performance Levels (PL)

�  PL a, PL b, PL c, PL d, PL e �  Structure Categories (Cat.)

�  Cat. B, Cat. 1, Cat. 2, Cat. 3, Cat. 4 ◦  IEC 62061 �  Safety Integrity Levels (SIL)

�  -, 1, 2, 3, 4

}  It is ultimately the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe working environment.

}  Most regulatory agencies don’t get involved until there is a reporting of an unsafe condition or an accident. ◦  Ontario, Canada is an exception (PHSR)

}  Functional safety ensures that safety functions relying on a control system will be effective for the associated risk(s).

}  Adherence to the guidance in the various industrial robot standards, technical specifications and technical reports will produce a safe machine.

}  An integrator should always check with the country of destination for any national deviations.