Standard Eurobarometer 28 - Public Opinion in the European ...ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/eb/eb28/eb28... · PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ... Al

No. 28 DECEMBER 1987

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COM MUN IT1 ES

EUROBAROMETER PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION, CULTURE. SURVEYS, RESEARCH, ANALYSES. RUE DE LA LOI 200,B-1049 BRUSSELS

HIGHLIGHTS

AGAINST THE BACKDROP OF THE STOCK EXCHRNGE CRASH, EXPECTATIONS FOR 1988 ARE LESS OPTINISTIC THAN THEY UERE A YEAR AGO. ONE I N TUO EUROPEANS SEES EUROPE'S PROGRESS AS "SLOW"; THREE OUT OF FOUR UANT I T TO SPEED UP.

'

292 OF US CITIZENS KNOW ABOUT THE EUROPEAN COMNUNITY. 70 2 OF THEN L IKE I T . 522 OF CITIZENS OF THE EC L IKE THE USA, 101 DDN'T. S IX OUT OF TEN EC CITIZENS SAY THE CON- NUNITY'S T IES WITH THE U.S.A. MATTER A GREAT DEAL. 862 OF US CITIZENS THINK THE SANE ABOUT ANERICA'S T IES WITH YESTERN EUROPE.

TEN AlNS OF THE SINGLE COMMON NARKET I N 1992 YERE PUT TO CONNUNITY CITIZENS I N EACH MENBER STATE: ONLY 3 "NOES" I N 120 QUESTIONS. NORE THAN 902 OF THOSE UHO THINK THAT "1992" UOULD NAKE A DIFFERENCE SEE I T AS "A GOOD THING". NORE THAN S IX OUT OF TEN RESPONDENTS UANT TO GO BEYOND THE SINGLE NARKET TOUARDS EUROPEAN UNIFICATION. MON6 THESE : A NAJORITY OF FRENCH, LUXENBOURGEOIS, BELGIANS, ITALIANS AND DANES ( ! 1 YANT "A CONNON CURRENCY"; A NAJORITY OF BRITISH UANT l'A STRONG COMMON DEFENCE"; "TRUE COOPERATION I N SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY" I S SEEN AS MOST IMPORTANT I N EACH OF ALL NEMBER COUNTRIES.

TUO THIRDS OF RESPONDENTS ARE "FOR A EUROPEAN GOUERNNENT RESPONSIBLE TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIANENT"; NEARLY TUO THIRDS O F THEN YANT THIS EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT TO HANDLE "PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONNENT", "SECURITY, DEFENCE" AND "SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICPIL RESEARCH" .

AYAREflESS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIANENT AMONG THOSE UHO HAVE HERRD OF I T REMAINS

YERE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS TOMORROU , . , I ' , THOSE UHO SAY THEY YOULD "CERTAINLY" GO AND VOTE ARE UP I N 7 COUNTRIES, DOWN I N 2, STABLE I N 3, CONPARED TO SPRING 1987.

RELATIVELY STABLE BUT I T S IMAGE H I T AN ALL-TIME HIGH I N AUTUMN 1987. " I F THERE

THE 'PRINCIPAL A IN FOR A ID TO THIRD UORLD COUNTRIES" SHOULD BE "TO HELP THEN TO BECONE SELF SUFFICIENT" 612 SAY. 172 CHOSE "TO RELIEVE THEIR POVERTY AND NISERY"; 182 YANT "TO PREPARE THEM TO BECOME REAL PARTNERS".

THE MAJOR PROBLENS FACING YOUNG PEOPLE TODAY ARE "LACK OF JOBS"; "INADEQUATE SCHOOL AND TRAINING"; "AIDS". AND OLDER CITIZENS RESPOND LIKEYISE.

ONE CITIZEN OF THE EUROPEAN CONNUNITY OUT OF THREE SPEAKS AT LEAST ONE FOREIGN LAN- GUAGE "YELL ENOUGH TO FOLLOY A CONVERSATION". JUST OVER HALF OF THE RESPONDENTS HAD (AT LEAST) SOME TRAINING I N ENGLISH, TUO FIFTHS I N FRENCH I D ONE THIRD I N GERRAN.

II

NOTICE

EURO-BAROMETER public opinion surveys have been conducted on behalf of the Directorate General Information, Communication, Culture of the Commission of the European Communities each spring and autumn since autumn of 1973. They have included Greece 'since autumn 1980, Portugal and Spain since autumn 1985.

An identical set of questions was. put to representative samples of the population aged fifteen and over in each country. For this survey 11.594 respondents were interviewed in their homes by professional interviewers, between October 5, 1987 and November 24, 1987.

Special national institutes, all members of the "European Omnibus Survey", were responsible f o r conducting the survey. A l l the institutes, which were selected by tender, belong to the "European Society for Opinion and Mgrketing Research" and comply with its standards.

The names of the institutes involved in the study and further technical information are listed in the appendix to this document.

The general coordination of the survey and the initial statistical analyses of the data collected was assured by "Faits et Opinions", Paris.

The figures presented in this document for the entire Community are means weighted according to the respective adult population. "Don't know" and "no answer" are abbreviated D.K. and N.A. Tables with percentages not adding up to 100 due to several responses allowed f o r are footnoted respectively. Percentages not adding up to 100 in other tables are due to rounding.

* * i l

In accordqnce with normal practice for this type of survey the Commission disclaims all responsibility for questions, results and commentaries. The present report by the serv'ice "Surveys, Research, Analyses" to the Director General for Information, Communication and Culture is an internal working document for the Commission of the European Communities.

III

TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

LISTS OF MAPS. FIGURES A N D TABLES ....................... I V

SUMMARY ................................................... X V

REPORT .................................................... 1

1 . THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY TODAY ........................... 1 1

1 . 1 Expectations for 1988 .............................. 1 1.2 European unification dynamics ...................... 7 1.3 European Community public support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1.4 The Danish Presidency and the Danish public . . . . . . . 18 1.5 The image of the European Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

2 . THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES .......... 2 5

2.1 Mutual Sympathy ................................... 25 2.2 European American Ties ............................ 27 2.3 Support for European Unification .................. 32

3 . THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY .................. 35 3.1 Support for the Single European Market . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.2 Going even further? ............................... 42 3.3 A European Government? ............................ 45 3.4 A European Union now ? ............................. 52

4 . THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT TODAY AND TOHORROU ............ 55 4.1 Public awareness and general impression ........... 55 4.2 Parliament's general role: as seen and as desired.58 4.3 If there were European elections tomorrow . . . . . . . . . 58 4.4 What about a REAL parliament ? .................... 61

5 . EUROPEAN SOCIAL AND POLICY ISSUES ..................... 65

5.1 The European Programme to fight cancer . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.2 Should the Community sponsor sports? .............. 66 5.3 European citizens and the Third World . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.4 The Young in the European Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.5 Attitudes towards the energy problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.6 Foreign languages spoken .......................... 76

APPENDIXES ............................................... Al

LIST OF HAPS AND FIGURES

IV

Maps Page

1 A European Government (percent in favour of those who reply; percent "no opinion") . . . . . . . . . . 46

2 A European Union Now? (percent in favour of those who reply; eercent "no opinion") . . . . . . . . . . 51

3 EP to Draft Constitution for European Union (percent in favour of those who reply; percent "no opinionT1) .............................. 64

4 EC-Programme Against Cancer (percent having .read or heard about it) ............................ 67

Figures

1 Expectations for the Coming Year Compared to the Current Year (Community as a whole, 1980 - 1987)... ......... i . . ....................... 2

2 General Expectations for Coming Year and Economic Balance Sheets for Past 12 Months (EC121.............. .............................. 7

3 The llEuro-Dynamometer ............................. 8

4 Change in Public Support for European Unification and for the EC, Spring 1987 - Fall 1 9 8 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

5 Support for European Unification and the EC: Evolution over Time.. .................... 13

5A Support for European Unification and the EC: Evolution over Time (percent positive answers by country) .................... 14/15

6 Awareness and Overall Impression of Commis,sion and Parliament (EC 12)................ 20

6 A Awareness and Overall Impression of Commission and Parliament (by country) .......... 22/23

7 Advantages of the Single Common European Market (percent "advantage", EC 1 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0

8 Going Further than.the Single Common European Market: In which Direction mainly? (EC 1 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3

9 What a European Government.Should be Responsible f o r ? (EC 1 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

10 Public Awareness of the European Parlia- ment, 1977 - 1 9 8 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

1 1 The Major Problems Facing Young People Today, as Seen by the Young and the Public at Large (EC 1 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3

12 Attitudes about Nuclear Power Stations ........... 75 13 Languages Learned and Languages Spoken

(percentages, EC 1 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

List of TablesIListe des tableaux page

1 Expectations f o r the Coming Year (1980-1987, Community as a whole)/Les attentes quant 13 lrannPe prochaine 1 1 9 8 0 - 1 9 8 7 , ensemble de la Communoutdl ..................................... 3

2 Fear o f a Third World War in the Next Ten Years (by country, percentagesl/la crainte d'une nouvelle guerre mondiale dans les dix prochaines annPes ( p a r pays, pourcentagesl .......................................... 5

3 The Danish Presidency in the Council in 1987/La prPsidence danoise du Conseil en 1 9 8 7 . . . . . . 19

4 The European Community and the United States of America(by country, percentages)/ La CommunautP europdenne et les Etats-Unis (par pays, pourcentagesl ................ 28

5 Comparison of European and American Opinion about US-Government Policy towards West- Europqan Unification/Comparaison de Iropinion europPenne et amPricaine concernent l a politique amdricaine d Irdgard de Irunificatlon de IrEurope occidentale. ....................................... 3 3

VI

6

7

8

9

10

1 1

1 2

13

14

Attitudes on the Single European Harket in 1992 (by country,percentages) Les attitudes d I'Pgard du grand march4 europPen en 1992 (par pays, pourcentages) .......... 36 Advantages of the Single European Harket in 1992 (rank order, EC12)/Les avantages du grand march4 europien en 1992 (EC12 d'aprhs le rang). ....................... 39

Advantages of the Single European Harket (rank order by country)/Les avantages du grand march4 europeen (par pays dlapras le rang). .................................. 41

Going Further than the Single European Harket? (by country, percentagesl/Aller plus loin que la realisation du grand march6 europPen? (par pays, pourcentages) ........................... 42

Going Further than the Single European Common Market? In which direction mainly? (rank order by country)/ Aller plus loin que Ia rPalisation du grand marchP europPen? Dans quelle direction principalement (par pays d' aprhs le rang) ..................................... 44

For or Against a European Government? (by country percentages)/Pour ou contre un Gouvernement EuropPen? /par pays, pourcentages) ...................................... 47

The Policy Areas Which Should become the Responsibility of a European Government (by country, percentages)/Les domaines qui devraient Qtre pris en charge par le Gouvernement Europeen (par pays, pourcentages) .......................................... 48

A European Union Now? (by country, percentages)/ L'union europPenne maintenant? (par pays, pourcentages) ........................... 5 2

Impression of the European Parliament - Having Seen or Heard Something (by country, p e r c e n t a g e s ) / L ' i m p r e s s f o n que l'on O sur le Parlement EuropPen - dlapras ce que l'on a lu QU entendu (par pays, pourcentages). . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

VII

15 Importance of the European Parliament in the Life of the European Community (by country, percentages)/L'importance du r6le actuel du Parlement europPen dans l a vie de l a CommunautP europPenne (par pays, pourcentages) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 . . . m . . . . 59

16 Desired Future Role of the European Parliament . (by country, percentages)/Le r6le souhait& pour le Parlement europPen (par pays, pourcentages) ................................ 59

17 "If There was a European Election To- morrow....?11 (percentages of those interviewed)/"S'il y avait demain une Plection europdenne ..... 3" (pourcentages des riponses obtenues) ...................................... 61

18 New Powers for the European Parliament? (by country, percentages)/CompPtences nouvelles pour le Parlement europPen? (par pays, pourcentages) ........................... 63

19 Attitudes on Sponsoring and Financial Support for European Sporting Events (by country, percentages)/ Attitudes sur le parrainage et l a participation financi&re d des manifestations sportives (par pays, pourcentages) ..................... 69

20 Principal Aims for Aid to the Third World (by country, percentages)/ Buts principaux d l'Pgard de l'aide aux pays du Tiers-fionde (par pays, pourcentages) ................................ 71

21 Major Problems Facing Young People Today trank order by country; total sample (15 years and over))/ProblPmes principaux auxquels l e s jeunes doivent faire face d l'heure actuelle (par pays draprPS le rang, pourcentages; Pchantfllon total (ag6 15 et plus)) .................................. 74

22 Foreign Languages Spoken? (by country, percentages)/Langues PtrangPres parlees? (par pays, pourcentages) ........................... 77

VIII

List of Tables in the first part of the Appendix (A)/ page Liste des Tableaux de la premiere partie de l'annexe (A)

Al Harmony at Home: 1986 and 1987 ( b y country, percentages)/La tranquillitd d lrintPrieur du pays: 1986 et 1987 (phr pays, pourcentages) .......................................... A 5

A 2 Harmony Abroad: 1986 and 1987 ( b y country, percentages)/La tranquillite d l'extPrieur du pays: 1986 et 1987 (par pays, pourcentages) .......................................... A 6

A3 Euro-Dynamometer" (per country, percentages) / l r L lEuro-Oynamometrep1 (par pays, pourcentages) ...................................... A 7

A4 Change in Public Support for European Unification and for the E C , Spring 1987" and Autumn 1987 ( b y country)/Changement de l'appui global de l'opinion d l'ínt&- gratfon EuropPnne et d l a CommunautP, printemps 1987 et automne 1987 (par pays) .......... A 8

A 5 Awareness and Impression of the European Commission - Having Seen or Heard Something b y country,percentagesl/La notoriPtP et l'impression s u r l a Commission EuropPenne - drapres ce que l'on a lu ou entendu (par pays, pourcentages) ........................... I . . . A 9

A6 Awareness and Impression of the Commission by Sex, Age, Education and Opinion Leader- ship ( E C 1 2 , percentages)/ L a n o t o r i P t P e t l'impression que l'on a de la Commission selon le sexe l'dge, l'dge fin d'Ptudes et ''opinion leadership" (CE12,pourcentages) ........ A 1 0

A7 Feelings about the USA 1984, 1985, 1987 in 8 E C member states/Opinion des Etats-Unis 1984, 1985, 1987 dans 8 Etats-Aembres de la CE.... .......................................... All

A8 US Government Policy Towards Western Euro- pean Unification 1984, 1985, 1987 as seen in 8 E C member states/La politique des Etats-Unis d I'Pgard de l'unification europPenne 1985, 1985, 1987 comme percue dans 8 Etats-#embres de la CE.... A 1 2

IX

A 9 Advantages of the Single European Market by Sex, Age, Education, and Opi- nion Leadership (percantages "advantage",

pPen selon ìe sexe, lr&ge, l'dge fin de I'Pducation et "opinion leadership?? (pour-

EClZ)/Les avantages du grand marche euro-

centages "QVQntQge", CEIZI.................. ..... Al3 A 1 0 The Single European Market by

the Socio-Political Profile of Those in Favour (EC12,percentages)/ Le grand march4 europPen selon le proffì socio-politique de ceux qui sont ??pourrr (CE12, pourcentages) ............................... A l 4

All A Responsible European Government? The Socio-Political Profile of Those in Favour (EC12, percentages)/Un gouvernement europ4en responsable? Le profil socio-politique de ceux qui sont rrpourrr tCE12, pourcentages) ............................... A15

A12 Awareness of the European Parliament (1977-1987, by country)/La notoriPtP du Parlement EuropPen (1977-1987, par pays) . . . . . . . . . . . A l 6

A13 Should the European Parliament to be Elected in 1989 Draft a Constitution for a European Union? (by European Parliamentary Party Preference, percentages)/Le Parlement europPen de 1989 deVFQft-il prPparer le projet de l'union europdenne? (selon prPfPren.ce partisane europPenne, pourcentages) .......................... A l 4

A 1 4 The European Programme for Fighting Cancer (by country, percentagesl/Le Pro- gramme europPen de lutte contre le cancer tpar pays, pourcentages1 ....................... A l 7

A15 Have You Heard about International Sport- ing Events Sponsored by the EC? (by country, percentages)/Avez-vous entendu parler des manifestations sportives internationales sponsorisPes par la CE? îpar pays, pourcentages) ...................................... A 1 7

A 1 6 Do Sporting Events Help to Make the EC Better Known? (by country, percentages)/Les manifestations sportives aident-elles B mieux connaftre la CE? tpar pays, pourcentages) ........................... A 1 8

_ - X

A17 For or against Aid to Third World Countries 1983 and 1987 ( b y country, percentages)/Pour ou contre I'aide -

aux pays du Tiers-Monde 1983 et I987 (par pays, pourcentages) ................................ Al8

A18 Reasons for Aiding Third World Countries ( b y country, percentages) Motifs d'aider Ies pays du Tiers- Monde (par pays, pourcentage) ...................... Al9

A19 Opinion About the Development of Nuclear Power Stations ( b y country, percentages)/L'oplnion sur Ie d4veIoppement des centrales nucldaires (par pays, pourcentages) ....................... ... ... , . . . . . . . . . . Al9

A 2 0 Attitudes about Nuclear Power Stations 1978-1987 (Community as a whole, percentagesl/Aktltudes d I'Pgard des centrales nucldaires 1978-1987 (Irensemble de Ia CommunautP, pourcentages) ...................................... A 2 0

List of Tables - Part Two of Appendix ( B l / Liste des tableaux de la deuxieme partie des annexes ( B l

B1 Le sentiment global de satisfaction de Ia vie/rhe Feeling of Overall Life Satisfaction .......................................Bi

B2 Le sentiment de satisfaction quant au fonctionnement de Ia dPmocratie/ The Feel- ing of Satisfaction with the Way Demo- cracy Works ...........'.............................Bi3

B3 L'attitude fondamentale d I'4gard de Ia

B4 Attitude d I'igard de I'unification de

soci4td/ Basic Attitude Towards Society ............ B 2 5

l'Europe occidentale/ Attitude Toward the Unification of Western Europe .................. B37

B 5 Jugement port4 sur I'appartenance d la CommunautP europdennel Attitude Towards Membership in the European Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B 5 3

X I

B6 Le sentiment què son pays a bPnPficiP de son appartenance d la CommunautP/ The.Feeling that his Country has Benefit- ted from Being a Member of the European Community .......................................... B67

B7 L'attitude en cas d'abandon du march& commun/ Attitude if the Common Market had Been Scrapped .................................. B71

B8 L'entente entre les pays de I a CommunautP europPnne au cours des douze derniers mois/ The Understanding between the Countries of the European Community over the Last Twelve Months ............................................. B85

B9 La notoriPtP du Parlement europPen/Aware- ness of the European Parliament .................... B92

B10 L'impression que l'on a 4ur le Parlement europPen draprPS ce que l'on a lu ou entendu/ The Impression People have on the European Parliament Following on what they have Read or Heard ................................. B97

B11 L importance du rdle actuel du Parlement europPen dans la vie de l a CommunautP europPenne/ Importance of the European Parliament's role in the Life of the European Community .......................... .......Blo2

B12 Le r6le souhait4 pour le Parlement europeen/ The Role Desired for the European Parliament. ........................................ Bl07

B13 L'annPe prochaine: meilleure ou ,molns bonne/ The Next Year: Better or Worse..............Blll

B14 Ce que l'on attend de I'annPe prochaine/ The Expectations for the Next Year.................Bll5

B15 Ce que l'on attend de I'annPe prochaine/

B16 Le danger d'une nouvelle guerre mondiale au cours des dix prochaines anndes/ Risk o'f a New World War in the Next Ten Years...........B123

The Expectations for the Next Year.................Bll9

XII

B I ? Evaluation des changements de la situation Pconomique des rPqions au cours des douze derniers mois/ Assessment of the Changes in the Country's Economic Situa- tion over the Past Twelve Months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B 1 3 1

B I 8 Evaluation des changements dans la situa- tfon des &nages au COUPS des douze derniers mois/ Assessment of the Changes in the Financial Situation of the Individual Households over the Past Twelve Months ............................. B 1 3 7

S U M M A R V

xv

THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY TODAY

1.1 European Community citizens are less optimistic about their prospects during the coming twelve months than they were a year ago. Optimists still outweigh the pessimists by 34% to 21% (Fig. 1 1 . Suspicion for this falls o n -t h e 19 Oc- tober stock exchange crash and its echo in the mass media. < 1 >

Other indicators, too, hint at more scepticism if not pessimism than a year ago. One out. of three Europeans expects more is domestic conflict in the shape of strikes and industrial disputes: up 19%. Two out of ten expect 1988 to be more troubled on the international front: up 7%, not astonishing in view of the situation in the Gulf (Table 1 1 . But fear of a third world war decreased further (Table 21 in the light of the GORBATCHEV-REAGAN summit.

Assessment of the general economic situation over the last twelve months shows more negative and less positive responses as compared to autumn 1986. Yet individual households viewing their own financial situation register slight reductions in both "better" and "worse" ratings: the "no change" rating went up (from 47% in autumn 1986 to 51% in autumn 1987 (Fig.21, this tendency is the same in all Member States except Greece and Luxembourg, where the deviations are not statistically significant, however].

1.2 One European in two sees Europe's progress as slow. Three out of four would prefer European unification to speed

l) Intervieving periods among member states ranged from 5 October 1987 to 24 lovember 1987. Out of seven countries uhere people were interviewed after 19 October, optimism dropped in six. Portugal is a noteuorthy exception: interviews Vere done in Hovember, optimism increased once iore as compared to a year ago. (The Redia had started to assess 19 October 1987 as, all things considered, less of a catastrophe than the 1929 "black friday".) In one country uhere intervieus were completed before 19 October, Belgium, pessimism fell by 12 percentage points.

I-

XVI

up, as the "Euro-DynamometerV1 again stresses. The overall picture shows a (statistically not significant) tiny increase in perceived actual progress as well as a slight decrease in the desired speed of progress (Fig. 3). But there are remarkable variations among countries (Table A3).

1.3 Support for "efforts to unify Uestern Europe" remains stable at 77% of all interviewed when compared to the spring 1987 survey. Support for the European Community is up for the Community as a whole according to the various yardsticks: one's country's membership being Ira good thing"; being beneficial; or whether dissolution of the EC would engender many regrets.

In spring 1987 , France and the Netherlands were making a leap forward. Now Ireland, Germany, Greece, Spain, Luxem- bourg and Italy advance (or recover) on the count of all three standard indicators. Portugal registers a remarkable increase on the score of perceived benefitting from being a member of the Community. The United Kingdom continues its tradition of slow but steady growth of support for the Com- munity (Fig. 4, 5 and 5A, Table A 4 ) .

1.4 Eight out of ten Danes had read or heard something about their country's presidency of the Council (July - December 1 9 8 7 ) ia the mass media; six out of ten thought it was "important" or "very important" (Table 3).

1.5 The public's awareness of the Commission via the media. now measured for the first time, is, on average throughout the Community higher than that of Parliament. Five percent fewer of those, however, who did actually hear or read something about the Commission had a "generally favourable im-

t

XVII

pression" of what they had heard or read, than those who evaluated the European Parliament (41% versus 46%) (Fig. 6, Fig. 6A, Table A5, see also heading 4.1 infra). <2>.

THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES

2 .1 2 9 % of US-Citizens know about the European Community as

a specific entity within Western Europe. Nine out of ten Americans who know about the European Community have a favourable opinion on it. This emerges from the highly interesting results of a public opinion survey carried out for the Press and Information Service of the Commission Delegation in Washington <3>. One in two EC citizens has a favourable opinion on the USA, one out of fiwe an unfavourable opinion. Positive attitudes vis-à-vis the USA are highest in Ireland (73x1, Luxembourg (68%). the United Kingdom (63x1 and Italy ( 6 0 % ) . Negative attitudes are highest in Greece (29x1, The Netherlands (27%). the United Kingdom (26%) and Denmark (26%) (Table 4).

.

2.2 Six Europeans out of ten consider that the Community's ties with the USA matter a great deal. Only Luxembourg and The Netherlands deviate remarkably from the EC average. The opinion that these ties do not matter a great deal is somewhat higher than the one out of four EC average in the UK and in Germany. 86% of United States citizens think their country's ties with Uestern Europe matter a great deal; one out of ten thinks the contrary.

____.-...- 2) Cf. "L'Europe a besoin d'un visage", dossier sp4c ia1 no 2 de l'EUROBAROBETBE, based on results of the "Europe 2000" special EUROBAROBEIER survey conducted at the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Rome Treaties, Brussels, Commission of the EC, Directorate General ICC, Service "Surveys, Research, Analysis", Barch 1987.

3)Fielduork and analyses in the U.S.A were carried out, after call for tender, by Gallup, Princeton, W.J. The report of this survey is available at the Commission ("Surveys, Research, Analysis", DG X ) .

XVIII

"DO you think the European Community's ties with the United States (of America) are closer or not as close as they were ten years ago?". More than a quarter of EC citizens do not answer this question. Among those who reply six Europeans out of ten see these ties as closer today; four out of ten as not as close as they were ten years ago. In the US, more than one in two thinks they have remained the same, one out of three thinks these ties are "closer today": 43% of Americans see their country's ties with Uestern Europe today as at least as close as they were ten years ago.

2 . 3 One citizen of the Community in two believes the US Gov- ernment supports unification of Uestern Europe. Two zens out of three say their country's Government unification of Uestern Europe (Table 41.

US citi- supports

THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY

3.1 Hore than 90% of those who think that completing the Single European Common Harket by 1992 would make a difference see it as -a good thing. It must, however, be kept in mind, that one person out of four interviewed assesses completion of the Single Market as "neither good nor bad" (Table 6).

We also put ten different specific measures foreseen in the Single Market Programme, such as: elimination of border controls; freedom to buy land or property; bringing the rates of V.A.T. closer together or equal access for public works contracts. Up to 81% see such measures as "an advantage". And even the "foreign contractorv1 item (the only.one not provoking at least a two thirds majority in favour) registered an overall majority (Fig.7, Table 71. There are

t

XIX

only 3 llnoesll in 120 questions, even if there is some variation among member countries as to where their preferences are strongest (Table 8 ) .

3.2 "Are you in favour of going even further than the Single Common European Harket towards unification of Europe?" Six Europeans out of ten say "yes". Among thdse who do reply, those having said llyesvl we asked: "In which direction mainly?" and offered four answers:

A political Union among the member states A strong common defence A single common currency A true cooperation in science and technology

Two thirds chose "real cooperation in science and technology", one in two a "common currency" (Fig.8,Tab. 9 and 10).

3.3 "Are you for or against the formation of a European government responsible to the European Parliament?" < 4 > . Twice as many of those who replied said "yes" than said "no" (Map 1, Table 11). Those giving a favourable response were prompted further: "What should be the responsibilities of t5is European government?":

Security, defence Protection of the environment The currency Cooperation with developping countries Relations with countries outside the European Community Scientific and technological research

"Protection of the environmentv1, Tvscientific and technological research", and "security, defence" take the lead for the

4)This is one of a set of questions put on behalf of the "Intergroupe Fédéralist pour l'Union Européenne du Parlement Europeen" ,and sponsored by a number of neus papers: "La Libre Belgique", "La Vanguardia", "Le Figaro", .La Repubblica", and "The Times".

xx

Community as a whole (Fig. 9 ) . In the answers a considerable analogy emerges with the preferences expressed under the heading 3.2 above (Table 1 2 ) .

3.4 There is a majority in favour of "a European union now" in all countries but three: the Danes are very strongly against, the British strongly, the Irish are evenly split (Map 2 , Table 1 3 ) <cf footnote 4 > .

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT TODAY AND TOHORROU

4.1 Awareness of the European Parliament remains relatively stable (44% in autumn 1 9 8 7 , 45% in spring 1 9 8 7 ) (Fig. 1 0 ,

Table A 1 2 ) . Parliament's image hit an all-time high in autumn 1987 (Cf. heading 1 . 5 supra, Fig. 6 and 6A f o r variation among countries and comparison with the Commission and it's image. For detailed tables and analyses see full report 1 .

4.2 Indeed Parliament's role "in the life of the Community nowadays" has never been assessed to a greater degree than in 1987. (The autumn 1987 score drops slightly since past spring.) Nevertheless: one in two Europeans would like to see Parliament play a still "more important part" than it does nowadays (Table A121 < 5 > . .

4.3 "If there were European Elections tomorrow......", the number of those who say they T1would certainly go and vote" has increased in seven countries (DX, D, E, I, L, P, UK), decreased in two (F, NL), and remained stable in three (B, GR, IRL) as compared to spring 1987 (Table 1 7 ) . T h f s f s not a forecast o f turnout f o r the 1989 European Election!

5) These questions uere put on behalf of the European Parliament.

4 . 4 "Are you for or against the European Parliament having the power to pass laws that will directly apply in all member countries of the European Community, that is in (your country) as well as elsewhere?11 <cf. footnote 4>. Two thirds of those who answer this question want, the European Parlia- ment to have "the power to pass laws that will directly apply in all member countries". And six out of ten, that is 81% of those who reply say that "the Parliament elected in 1989 should have the job of drafting a constitution for the European union" (Map 3 ) <cf. footnote 4 > .

EUROPEAN SOCIAL AND POLICY ISSUES

5.0 In the framework of the EUROBAROMETER No. 28 survey, several special studies were conducted on behalf of the Eu- ropean Parliament and various specialised services of the Commission: a measurement of the initial impact of the campaign for the Commission's "Programme f o r the Prevention of Cancer"; a study on the awareness and perceived utility of the Commission sponsoring European sporting events; a study on Europeans and Aid to Development; a study on Problems of the Young, with particular focus on matters of training and unemployment < 6 > ; and a study on Europeans and the Energy Problem.

Detailed results will be presented in special reports in due course. Several questions of general interest have been sub- jected to a rough preliminary analysis so that they could feature in early, illustrative form among the results of the present report. Here are the headlines:

6) This study is based on a special extension of the sample among people aged 15 to 24 years. Prelimi- nary results given here are based on the standard sample only,

XXII

5.1 Less than four out of ten Europeans had heard anything about a European Programme for Fighting Against Cancer < 7 > .

(see Map 4, Table A14).

5.2 Two out of three citizens favour the Community sponsoring European sporting events and giving financial support to them (Table 19, A 1 5 , A16).

5.3 The "princip'al aim of aid to third world countries" should be "to help them to become self sufficient" say 61%. 17 % prefer as aim "to relieve their poverty and misery"; 18% want "to prepare them to become real partners" [Table 20).

5.4 The major problems facing young people today are "lack of jobs", "inadequate school and training" and "AIDS". (Fig. 1 1 , Table 21 1 .

5.5 The number of people seeing "the risks involvedwin the "development of nuclear power stations for the production of electricity" as being "unacceptable" represented a minority of 43% t o f those who replied to the question) in 1 9 8 4 .

The respective autumn 1987 score is majoritarian ( 5 6 % ) but a 6% drop was registered as compared to one year earlier i.e. shortly after the Tchernobyl catastrophe. (The number of people seeing such development as I'of no interest" remained as stable over this period ( 8 to 9%) as did the number of those who preferred not to reply at all ( 1 1 to 12%)) Fig. 12).

5.6 One European Community citizen in three of speaks at least one foreign language "well enough to follow a conversation" (Table 22). 51% tho-se interviewed had (at least some) training (at school or elsewhere) in English,

7) See also the first report on the extensive study conducted within the framework of the EUROBABOIIE- TER no 27 survey: Europe Against Cancer, published on 8 October 1987.

XXIII

42% in French, 3 3 % in German. 36% speak English-"well enough to follow a conversation", 2 7 % do s o in French, 2 5 % in German < 8 > (Fig. 1 3 ; native speakers of the respective language are included in this figure).

-..- 8) Ihe language questions are part of the study on "Problems Facing Young People in the EC". They sere put to the total sample. Percent foreign languages "learned" and "spoken sell enough to follou a conversation" are higher among people aged 15 to 24 as compared to their elders in practically every language: 752 have had training in English, 53% in French, 37% in 6erian, 212 in Spanish, 202 in Italian.

R E P O R T

- 1 -

CHAPTER ONE

T H E EURQPEIFI IN C O M M U N I T Y T O D A Y

1 (. 1 EXPECTATIONS FOR 1988< 1 >

European Community citizens are less optimistic about their prospects during the coming twelve months than they were a year ago.

SO FAR AS YOU ARE COIICERIIED, DO YOU THINK THAT 1988 WILL BE BETTER OR WORSE THAII 19871

(1 1 BETTER (21 WORSE (31 SAME [O) ?

Yet optimists still outweigh the pessimists by 34% to 21%.

but the difference dropped 4 percentage points as compared to a year ago (Fig. 1, Tables 1 and B13). Suspicion for this falls on 19 October stock exchange crash and its echo in the mass media. Interviewing periods among member states ranged from 5 October 8 7 to 2 4 November 8 7 . Out of seven countries where people were interviewed after 19 October, optimism dropped in six<2>. In the one country, where interviews were

1) For this section, questions Vere asked on behalf of the Gallup International Association. Data uere kindly made available by the Secretary General, nr. Morsan Webb.

2) Portugal is a noteworthy exception. Intervieus Vere finished on 24 Bovember, optimism increased once more as compared to a year ago: the media had started to assess 19 October 1987 as, all things considered, less of a catastrophe than the 1929 "black friday".

- 2 -

50 - 45 -. 43 -. 35 e -

30

25 . 20 . 15

10

5

O 1

FIGURE 1

WORSE

*:

- -

BEITER .. ..

I

EXPECTATIONS FOR THE COMING YEAR COMPARED TO THE CURRENT YEAR

(Communi ty as a whole, 1980 - 1987) *

completed before 19 October, Belgium, pessimism fell by 12 percentage points.

Especially those who are well-off i.e.who fall in the highest quartile of family income in their country are less optimistic than one year before: 40% in 1987 as,compared to 4 5 % in 1986; the respective figures for those in the lowest income quartile in their country are 31% and 32%.

- 3 -

Table/Tableau 1 : EXPECTATIONS FOR THE COHING YEAR (1980-1987, Community as a whole, percentagesl/Les attentes quant d 1 'annie prochafne 11980-1987, enserble de la Couunauti, pourcentages) ( * I

-----_------___----------------. FEEL THAT THE conIn6 YEAR WILL BE:/ESTIMITT OU€ L'MITE€ PROCHAIM SERA: .bet ter/& lleure .the samelsans changewnt . uorse/rofns bonne STRIKES AND INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES (IN YOUR COUNTRY):/ LES GRNES ET COITFLITS SOCIAUX IDANS VOTRE PAYS): .uil 1 increase/augren teront .uil1 remain the samelreste- rant au nfveau actuel uil1 decreaseldhinueront

----_------___----__-----------. THE YEAR ON THE INTERNATIONAL FRONT WILL BE:/CE SERA A L'EX- TERI €UR UME ANflEf: .fairly peacefnl/assez tranquf Ile .remain the samelconne raf n tenant . troubl,ed/agf tPe

- - 1980

.-----

20 30 43

43 36

14

.-----

lo

28

53 - - (*)"Don't knous" excluded fror the table but included in the calculation of percentages./

Les non-riponses ne sont pas reprfses dans ce tableau, nafs corptent dans le calcul des pourcentages.

Other indicators, too, hint at more scepticism if not pessimism than a year ago.

LOOKINS AHEAD TO YEXT YEAR 1988, DO YOU THINK STRIKES AND INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES (IN THIS COUNTRY) WILL INCREASE, DECREASE OP PEHAIN THE. SAHE?

(1 1 INCREASE (21 DECREASE ( 3 ) REHAIN-THE S M E (O) ?

- 4 -

LOOKIN6 AHEAD TO PEXT YEAR 1988, DO YOU THINK IT WILL BE A PEACEFUL YEAR MORE OR LESS FREE OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES, A TROUBLED YEAR WITH MUCH IIITERNATIOIIAL DISCORD, OR REMIW THE SAM?

(1 1 PEACEFUL YEAR (2 ) TROUBLED YEAR (3 ) REMAIN THE SAME (41 ?

HERE IS A SORT OF SCALE ( SHOW CARD). WOULD YOU, YITH THE HELP OF THIS CARD, TELL HE HOY YOU ASSESS THE CHANCES OF A WORLD-WAR BREAKIN6 OUT IN THE HEXT 10 YEARS?

- WORLD-WAR CERTAIN 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

O - NO DAIIGER OF WAR

One European out of three expects more domestic conflict in the shape of strikes and industrial disputes: up 19%. Four out of ten expect 1988 to be more troubled on the international front: up 7%, not astonishing in view of the situation in the Gulf (Tables Al, A2, B14, B15). But fear of a third world war decreased further (Tables 2, B16) in the light of the GORBATCHEV-REAGAN summit.

- 5 -

Table/Tableau 2: FEAR OF THIRD WORLD VAR IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS (by conntry,percentages)/la crafnte d'une nouvelle guerre rondfale dans les dix prochafnes annees (par pays,pourcentages) (1 )

DK

1 4 10 42 43

1 5 10 46 32

IPL

2 14 12

34 38'

3 15 1 1 31 32

I

2 9 12 45 32

1 10 10 45 33

L

2 5 12 39 42

1 9 10 40 36

6 8 60 26

7 9 60 20

(1) Graduated scale of probability from 100 to O; a score above 50 thus corresponds to more than

one-in-two chance. The average scores are equal to the values obtained divided by ten./Echelle de probahflft4 grodde de 100 d o; les degr4s de probabilfr4 supPrfeurs d 50 correspondent donc d plus d'une chance sur deux. les scores moyens sont &aux aux valeurs obtenues dfvfsees par dfx.

<2) of those uho replylde ceux guf repondent (3) percent "no ansuer" of total sample/pourcent "sans reponse" des personnes fnterrogees

- 6 -

HOW DO YOU THINK THE GEIIERAL ECONOlIIC SITUATIOR II T H I S COUITRY HAS CHANGED OVER THE LAST 12 HONTHS?

(11 GOT A LOT BETTER (21 GOT A LITTLE B E H E R (3) STAYED THE SAHE (I I GOT A LITTLE WORSE (51 GOT A LOT WORSE ( O 1 ?

HOW DOES THE FIIANCIAL SITUATION OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD WOW COMPARE WITH UHAT I T WAS 12 IONTHS AGO?

(1 1 GOT A LOT BETTER (21 601 A LITTLE BETTER (31 STAYED THE SAlIE (41 GOI A LITTLE WORSE (51 A LOT WORSE (O1 ?

Assessment of the general economic situation over the last twelve months shows more negative and less positive responses as compared to autumn 1986 (Table B17). Yet individual households viewing their own financial situation register slight reductions in both ratings: "better" and "worse"; the "no change" rating went up from 47% in autumn 1986 to 51% in autumn 1987 (Fig.2, Table B18). This tendency is the same in all Member States except Greece and Luxembourg, where the deviations are not statistically significant, however.

- 7 -

FIGURE 2

GENERAL EXPECTATIONS FOR COMING YEAR AND

(EC1 2) ECONOMIC BALANCE SHEETS FOR PAST 1 2 MONTHS

GFNFRAL FXPFCTATIONS FOR COMING YEAR 1987 I

~~

C 1 1986

O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 O 0

CHANGE OF GENERAL ECONOMIC SITUATION IN PAST 12 MONTHS 1987 I 1986 I II

O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 O 0

CHANGE OF HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST 12 MONTHS 1907 I I 1986

O 10 20 JO 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 O 0 percant

0 better m no change worse

1.2 EUROPEAN UNIFICATION DYNAHICS

One European in two sees Europe's progress as slow. Three out of four would prefer European unification to speed up, as the Euro-Dynamometer stresses again (Fig.3).

IN YOUR OPINION, HOU IS THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY, THE EUROPEAN UNIFI- CATION ADVANCING NOUADAYS? PLEASE LOOK AT THESE PEOPLE (SHOW CARDI. I I R O 1 IS STANDING STILL, NUo 7 IS PUWNING AS FAST AS POSSIBLE. CHOOSE THE ONE UHICH BEST CORRESPONDS WITH Y O U OPINIOW OF EUROPEAN COIIHUNIIY, EUROPEAN UNIFICATION.

1 2 3 1 5 6 7

AND UHICH CORRESPONDS BEST TO UHAT YOU WOULD LIKE?

c

- 8 -

FIGURE 3

THE 'EURO-DYNAMOMETER'

'In your oplnlon, how Ir the European Communfty, the European unmcatlon ad- vanclng nowadays? Please look at there people. No 1 Is 8tandlng 411, No 7 Ir runnlng ar fart (u porslble. Choose the one whlch best comtpondr wllh your oplnlon d the European Communfty, the European unllicatlon. And whlch cor. rerponds bert to what you would Ilke?'

e . . a

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

EUROPE'S PERCEIVED CURRENT PROGRESS (EC 1 2)

30 ....................................................

25 ....................................................... ~~ ~

20 ......................................

10 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................n :. ---I::: o '. -L.:: ...

NONE 2 3

....................................................................

.................... ..............

...............................................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.... m ...e 4 5 6 AS FAST AS

DnCClDl C

EUROPE'S DESIRED PROGRESS (EC12)

30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25 ............................................................................. ;.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20 ..........................................................................

15 .........................................................................

10 ..............................................................

5 ...........................................

o '. m...m...L::: .... . . .

..............

I NONE 2 3 4 5 6 AS FAST AS

POSSIBLE 0 1986 1987

- 9 -

The overall picture shows a (statistically not significant) tiny increase in perceived actual progress as well as a slight decrease in the desired speed of progress. The average. score (ranging from l=very slow to 7=very fast) of progress perceived is 3.38; the average score of progress desired is 5.38 (Table A3). But there are remarkable variations among countries. Hore actual progress than a year ago is perceived particularly by the French (average score up 0.241, the Irish (up 0.241, and the Spanish (up 0.121, less progress is perceived by the Greeks (down 0.37) and the Danes (down 0.201 ( 1 ) in particular. On average, the French, the Dutch and the Danes want a faster than the presently perceived rate of European unification and Community progress than they did in 1986. Italians and the Portuguese register an unchanged score; the average score for desired progress of the Germans, the Greek, British and the Belgians dropped slightly.

If we put the question about the progress of "understanding between the countries of the European Community" instead of referring to the progress of "European unification" and "the European Community":

IN YOUR OPINION, OVER THE LAST 12 IIONTHS, HAS THE UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUBOPEAU COIIHUNITY (COHIION IIARKET) IN GEIERAL INCREASED, DECREASED OB STAYED ABOUT THE SAME?

1. INCREASED I11 GENERAL 2. DECREASED IN GENERAL 3 STAYED ABOUT THE SAME O ?

- and we should remember that our survey was done before the Copenhagen summit! - we find the percentage of people per- ceiving an increase in such "understanding between the countries" to rise 4 percentage points since autumn 1986 at the level of "the Twelve" but a rise of 7 points for "the Ten". .

- 10 -

This is all the more interesting as soon as we look at individual country's change of public opinion:

INCREASE IN UNDERSTANDING BETUEEN COUYTRIES OF THE EUROPEA1 COHHUNITY OVER THE LAST TWELVE HONTHS (PERCENTAGE INCREASE PERCEIVED, 1986 - 1987 ..................................................

1986 1987 DIFF.

FRANCE DEUTSCHLAND UNITED KINGDOH ITALIA DANHARK IRELAND ELLAS BELGIE/BELGIOUE NEDERLARD PORTUGAL LUXENBOURG ESPANA

25 18 13 23 18 32 31 28 16 55 27 54

39 + 14 27 + 9 18 + 5 25 + 2 20 + 2 33 + 1 31 O 28 O 16 . O 54 - 1 23 - 4 39 - 15

No wonder that Spain and Portugal are at such a high level during the year of "joining the club". Little wonder: the drop of enthusiasm among Spanish having become conscious of the efforts necessary on their own part as well as of the efforts necessary to get what they consider a fair share of the cake. Little wonder either: the lack of a respective drop in Portugal in view of Community efforts to help the poorest member of the family. Notable the (before Copen- hagen) British rise by 5 points. Remarkable the leap forward in Germany by 9 points: controversial public debate at least strengthens awareness. Sensational the French jump! Intense public debate plus growing consensus furthers consciousness even more effectively, of course.

- 11 -

1.3 EUROPEAN COHHUNITY PUBLIC SUPPORT

The level of general public support f o r Europe has been con- tinuously measured in the EUROBAROMETER surveys by the following questions:

IN GENERAL, ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST EFFORTS BEING MADE TO U I F Y WESTERN EUROPE?

(1 1 FOR ’ - VERY MUCH (2 ) FOR - TO SOME EXTENT ( 3 ) AGAINST - TO SOME EXTENT (4) AGAIRST - VERY MUCH

LABEL USEO I I TABLES ANO FIWRES

I I FICATIOH

GENERALLY SPEAKING, DO YOU THINK THAT (YOUR COUNT11Y’S) MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (COMMON MARKET) IS.. . (11 GOOD THING ( 2) BAD THING ( 3 ) NEITHER GOOD NOR BAD (4) o ?

U B E L USEO IN 1ABLES MD FIGURES

REMBERSHIP

TAKINS EVERYTHING INTO CONSIDERATION, WOULD YOU SAY THAT (YOUR COUIITRY) HAS ON BALANCE BENEFITED OR NOT FROM BEIIG A MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (COMMON MARKET) ?

LABEL USEO I I TABLES MO FIGURES

BEIEFIT

IF YOU WERE IO BE TOLD TOMOPPOW THAT THE EUROPEAN CONMUNITY NOMMON - MARKET) FERENT OR RELIEVED?

HAD BEEN SCRAPPED, WOULD YOU BE VERY SORRY ABOUT IT, INDIF-

LABEL USEO I I TABLES ANO FIGURES

REMET OISSOLUTIOI

F I G U E 4

EC1 2

BELGIQUE

DANMARK

DEUTSCHLAND

E U S

€SPAGNA

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITAUA

LUXEMBOURG

NEDERUND

PORTUGAL

UNITED KINGDOM

CHANGE IN PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR EUROPEAN UNIFICATION AND FOR THE EC, SPRING. 1987 - FALL 1987

MEMBERSHP BENEFIT DISSO LUTN

k I -20 -10 o 10 20 -20 -10 o 10 20 -20 -10 o 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20

PERCENTAGE POINTS

PERCENTAGE POINTS

PERCENTAGE POINTS

PERCENTAGE POINTS

- 13 -

90 - -

ao 70

Support for "efforts to unify western €uropen (UNIFICATION) remains stable at 77% of all interviewed when compared to the spring 1987 survey. Support for the European Community is up for the Community as a whole according to the respective three standard yardsticks: one's country's membership (MEMBERSHIP), being ''a good thing"; befrlg beneficial (BENEFIT); or whether dissolution (DISSOLUTICiYI o f the EC would engender regrets (Fig. 4, Table A4).

In spring 1987, France and the Netherlands were making a leap forward. Now Ireland, Germany, Greece, Spain, Luxem- bourg and Italy advance (or recover) on the count of all three standard indicators concerning the Community. Portugal registers a remarkable increase on the score of perceived benefitting from being a member of the Community. The United Kingdom continues its tradition o f slow but steady growth of support f o r the Community (Fig. 5 and 5 A , Tables B4, B5, B6, B7).

MEMBERSHIP --_ UNlRCAllON ... BENEFIT - DISSOLUTION

_--- r___-. _ _ .____ - -- ___-_- -.- - -

-_----- *.. .*. -.- -- --. ..' -- .-____* -: ---__ __--_-----__ -- ___-_ --..-

30 - - 20

lo I

FIGURE 5

- - --

EC9 EC10 EC12 0 1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : *

- 14 -

F IGURE !3

SUPPORT FOR EUROPEAN UNIFICATION AND THE EC: EVOLUTION OVER TIME

(percent posit ive answers by country)

D A N M A R K

D E U T S C H L A N D

9

I)

œ

E S P A N A

E L L A S

.y ,. ..:

\ -

F R A N C E N 4

- 15 -

FIGURE 5A (continued)

I R E L A N D I T A L I A

L U X E M B O U R G Iœ t

P O R T U G A L U N I T E D K I N G D O M

œ m a 3

m m

- 16 -

We constituted a simple typology of general (global and dif- fuse) support of European unification and the European Com-

munity, based on the "UNIFICATION of Western Europe" question and on the "one's country's MEMBERSHIP in the European Community being a good t a bad) thing" question < 3 > . In this way, we can identify each person interviewed as to whether she or he is "euro-indifferentT1, "euro-positive" or rleuro- negative". This is of descriptive as well as of analytical use. For instance, the percentage tout of all interviewees) of "Euro-indifferents" by country is the following:

3) Construction of the Typology of European Attitudes "IEA"

llembership of the EC

I neither

1 2

uhere (1 1 = positive attitudes (2 ) = ambivalent attitudeslundecided (31 = negative attitudes

- 17 -

EURO-INDIFFERENT BY COUNTRY AND EC1 2 (PERCENT OF ALL PERSONS INTERVIEYED

UNITED KINGDOH DANII ARK IRELAND ESPANA PORTUGAL DEUTSCHLAND ----------------- ELLAS BELGIE/BELGIQUE FRAHCE NEDERLAND ITALIA LUXEHBOURG

EUROPEAN COHHUNITY (EC1 21

............................

Looking only at those who take a clear stand, their respective proportion in the various member countries is as follows:

BY COUNTRY: "EURO-POSITIVE" AND "EURO-NEGATIVE" (PROPORTION OF THOSE wo TAKE A CLEAR STAND, t

LUXEHBOUR6 100 i O0 ITALIA 99 : o1 PORTUGAL 98 : 02 NEDERLAND ( * I 97 : 03 FRANCE (*I 97 : 03

ESPANA 96 : 04

DEUTSCHLAND 93 : 07 IRELAND 92 : O8 ELLAS 83 : 17 UNITED KINGDOH 82 : 18 D AHHARK 57 : 43

EUROPEAN COHHUNITY 94 : 06

(*I sequence presented based on percent of all intervieued, cf. percent euro-indifferent in respective member states (supra1

BELGIE/BELGIQUE ('1 97 : 03

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ----------

Although indifference is obviously more dangerous for public support of "Europe" than definite hostility, we shall see that majorities of up to 81% (of all interviewed!) reveal

.

- 18 -

for the Community as a whole, and of up to 91% in individual member countries, as soon as more concrete questions are put (cf. chapter 3.1, infra) < 4 > .

1.4 THE DANISH PRESIDENCY AND THE DANISH PUBLIC

Eight Denes out of ten had read or heard something about their cõuntryls presidency of the Council (July - December 1 9 8 7 ) in the mass media; six out of ten thought it was "important" or "very important".

IN THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY; EACH HEHBER STATE, IN TURN, BECOHES THE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL OF HINISTERS FOR SIX MONTHS. JUST NOU, IT'S THE TURN OF DEYMRK. HAVE YOU RECENTLY READ II THE NEUSPAPERS OF HEARD ON RADIO OR TELEVISION ANYTHING ABOUT BELGIUH'S PRESIDENCY?

WHETHER YO0 HEARD ABOUT IT OR NOT, DO YOU THINK IT IS AN IHPORTANT THING OR NOT THAT DENMARK IS PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL OF HIlISTERS OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY AT 'THIS TIHE?

Earlier, one Belgian in two had become aware of his or her country's presidency; 56% thought it "(very) important". The British had assessed their presidency as lltvery) important" with a score of 5 9 % . but only 2 2 % had "recently heard or read about it" during the respective period, i.e. July to December 1 9 8 6 (Table 3).

4) See also the "Scenario January of the Year 2000" in EUROBAROHETER 'Europe 2000", Special Edition at the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome, Harch 1987.

- 19 -

Table/Tableau 3: THE DANISH PRESIDENCY IN THE COUNCIL IN 1987/10 pr4sfdence danoise du Conseil en 1987

1.5 THE IHAGE OF THE EUROPEAN COHHISSION

Awareness of European citizens of their directly elected Parliament has been measured for several years in the EURO- BAROMETER surveys; the "visibility" of the Commission was asked for the first time in autumn 1 9 8 7 .

HAVE YOU RECENTLY SEEN OR HEARD IN THE PAPERS, OR ON THE RADIO OB TELEVISION, ANYTHING ABOUT THE EUROPEAN COHHISSION IN BRUSSELS, THAT IS THE GOHIIIISSION OF THE EUBOPEM COHIUNITY?

- 20 -

(IF YES) HAS UHAT YOU READ OR HEARD GIVEI YOU A GEIERALLY FAVOURABLE OR UNFAVOURABLE IIPRESSION OF THE EUROPEAN COHHISSION?

( 1 ) GEIIERALLY FAVOURABLE IHPRESSION ( 2 1 GENERALLY UNFAVOURABLE IHPRESSION ( 3 1 NEITHER FAVOURABLE IOR UNFAVOURABLE (VOLUITEERED)

It appears that public awareness of the Commission via the media is, on average throughout the Community, higher than that of Parliament. Five percent fewer of those, however, who did actually hear or read something about the Commission in autumn 1987 had a llgenerally favourable impression" of what they had heard or read, than those who evaluated the European Parliament likewise (41% versus 46%) (Fig. 6, Ta- b l e s A 5 , A 1 2 1 , cf a l ç o chapter 4 . 1 , infra). One must remem-

FIGURE 6

AWARENESS AND OVERALL IMPRESSION OF COMMISSION AND PARLIAMENT (EC12)

F 70

./ 60

- s o P

T

ber that the image of the European Parliament as measured by percent "favourable impressionT1 had been 34 in Spring 1987, i.e. seven percentage points below the autumn 1987 commission image. Only continuous monitoring will allow for a sta-

- 21 -

ble assessment of the relative image of both institutions (as well as of the other Community institutions).

2 8 % of those who had recently become aware of the Commission via the mass media had a "generally unfavourable impression of what they heard or read", while the respective critical figure about the European Parliament is 22%. One can only tentatively assess, without further research, whether the fact that one European out of four gives an unprompted response of "neither favourable nor unfavourable" for both Commission and European Parliament reflects neutral and objective reporting by the (national) media or an individual lack of interest in Community affairs<5>.

Nore men than women, less young up to 24 than their elders, more formally better educated and more "opinion leaders" (than "non-leaders") have llrecentlyT1 become aware of the Commission via the mass media. Among those who recently be- came aware of the Commission, more men, more of the young tup to 24 years) more of those having had little formal education had a "rather favourable impression" of what they heard or read. "Opinion leaders" and "non-leaders" do not differ in this respect(Tab1e A 6 ) .

53% of the "europositive" ( c f . heading 1 . 3 , supra) had a "rather favourable impression" of what they "recently heard or saw about the Commission" in the media (i.e. 1 2 percentage points above the average), 19% had a rather unfavourable impression. 70% of the "euronegative" had a "rather unfavourable impression". 7 0 % of the "euroindifferent" did not "recently see or hear (anything) about the European Commis- sion" in the media at all: they do not pay attention. I

-- 5) It rust aluays be remembered that many people are not interested in politics, in their everyday 1ife.For further details on "things in life people 'are interested in" see EUPOBAROHEIER Report No 27, p.2.

- 22 -

FIGURE 6A ,

AWARENESS AND (XIERALL IMPRESSION OF COMMISSION AND PARLIAMENT

( b y country )

D E U T S C H L A N D A 7 0

~ 6 6 0

6 5 0

.I 40

D A N M A R K

E L L A S

’ E S P A N A F R A N C E

- 23 -

FIGURE 6A (continued)

I R E L A N D

L U X E M B O U R G

E:

P O R T U G A L

I T A L I A

N E D E R L A N D

f g i E

U N I T E D K I N G D O M

A A I :

- 24 -

Awareness as well as evaluation of both'institutions vary according to country (Fig. 6A, Tables A5, A12).

Whether the image of the Commission depends on the presence of individual members of the Commission in the mass media, remains to be investigated. In any case: mass media systems are still national mass media systems; most times they give members of national Government, i.e. members of the Commu- nity's most powerful institution, the Council (of national Ministers) advocating national interests an advantage over the Commission and its members who are bound by the Treaties to take a stand in the general interest of the Community as a wholec6i>.

6) Cf. 'LIEurope a besoin d'un visage', dossier special no 2 de llEUROBAROIETRE, based on results of the 'Europe 2000' special EUPOBAROHETER survey conducted on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Rome Treaties, Brussels, Commission of the EC, Directorate General ICC, Service "Surveys, Research, Analyses", larch 1987.

k

- 25 -

C H A P T E R T U O

T H E E U R O P E A N C O M M U N I T Y A N D T H E

U N I T E D S T f i T E S O F C?LMERICC?L

2 . 1 H U T U A L S Y H P A T H Y

A public opinion survey has been carried out for the Press and Information Service of the Commission Delegation in Washington, covering a variety of topics of interest for EC- USA relations<7> and this moreover around the same time as

the EUROBAROMETER No 2 8 survey was done. Therefore a few questions of general nature were asked correspondingly in Europe and in the USA. The results are highly interesting.

DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE READ OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THE EUROPEAN C O H ~ I T Y , OR THE cannaw HARKET, AS IT'S ALSO CALLED?

2. no 1. YES

O. DOH'T KNOW

2 9 % of US-Citizens know about the European Community as a specific entity within Western Europe.

7) Fieldwork and analyses in the U.S.A vere carried out, after call for tender by Gallup, Princeton, N.J. The report of this survey is available at the Directorate general ICC, Service "Surveys, Research and Analysis".

- 26 -

PLEASE USE THIS CARD TO TELL HE YOUR FEELINGS ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF AHERICA ( SHOU CARD) . DO YOU HAVE A VERY 600D, FAIRLY 600D. BATHER BAD, OR VERY BAD OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES?

1. VERY COOD 2 . FAIRLY 600D 3 . NEITHER 600D NOR BAD ( VOLUNTEERED) 4. RATHER BAD 5. VERY BAD o. ?

TELL RE YOUR FEELINGS ABOUT THE EUROPEAN COHllUNITY. DO YOU HAVE A

EUROPEAN COHIIUNIIY? VERY 600D, FAIRLY 6000, RATHER BAD, OR VERY BAD OPINION .OF THE

1 . VERY 600D 2. FAIRLY 600D 3 . NEITHER 600D NOB BAD ( VOLUNTEERED 1 4. RATHER BAD 5. VERY BAD O . DON'T KllOQ

Examination of the results of the measurement of mutual sympathy between European Community and the United States as seen through the eyes of samples of their respective publics, shows:

OPINION ABOUT EACH OTHER (PERCENT OF THOSE INTERVIEWED)

EC1 2 ON USA

VERY 600D 9 FAIRLY COOD 43 UEITHER 600D NOR BAD ( + I 25 RATHER BAD 15 VERY BAD 4

4 D.K.1N.A. - TOTAL 100 -------------

(+ 1 volunteered

USA OY EC

27 63 4 2 2 2

1 O0 _.

Nine out of ten Americans who know about the European Commu- nity have a favourable opinion of it. One in two EC citizens has a favourable opinion of the USA, one out of five an unfavourable opinion. Positive attitudes vis-à-vis the USA are

- 27 -

highest in Ireland (73%). Luxembourg (68%). the UK (63%) and Italy (60%). Negative attitudes are highest in Greece (29%). The Netherlands ( 2 7 % ) . the UK (26%) and Denmark (26%) (Table 4 section 1).

The evolution of "feelings about the United States" in eight countries of the European Community tas asked by an American research institute in the same ("European Omnibus") surveys that contained the EUROBAROMETER questions) in Autumn.1984, Autumn 1985, Spring 1987 and now asked on behalf of the Com- mission of the European Community, does reveal differences across time as well as countries: while "very good" or trgoodlv opinions declined in the United Kingdom, Italy, Ger- many and the Netherlands, they went up in France and Greece and fluctuated on a high level in Ireland and on a rather low level in Belgium (Table A7).

2.2 EUROPEAN - AHERICAN TIES

Six Europeans out of ten consider that the Community's ties with the USA matter a great deal.

IN YOUR OPINION, HOU IMPORTANT ARE THE EUROPEAN COMMURITY' S TIES UITH UNITED STATES? UOULD YOU SAY THEY HATTER A 6REAT DEAL, OR THAT THEY AREN' T VERY IIPORTANT?

1 . o . 7

MATTER A GREAT DEAL 2. no1 VERY IIPORTANT

- 28 -

Tab1 e i l a b l eau 4: THE EUROPEAN COnHUWITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AHERICA (by country,percentapes)/la corpunite euro@enne et les Etats-Unis (par pays, pourcentages)

.-----------------------. 1)Feelings about the US. of Ameri ca/0pinion des Etats-Unis ( v e r y ) m & ( t d s N " neither good nor bad/ n i bonne n i muvaise(*: bad~iauvaise n. a ./d. k .-s. r . / ns . p.

2)Present US pol i cy towards Western European unification i v l a politique actuelle des Etat! Unis A l ' b a r d de l'unification Ewlopeenne est supporti ng/ favorable opposi wopposde n. a. /d. k. -s. r. /n. s, p.

.I------------------___.

31 EC t ies with US/les liens entre l a CE et les Etats-Unis matter a great d e a l i cmptent beaucwp not very importanti pas t ds important n. a. /d. k , -s. r , /n. s. p.

....................... 4) EC t ies with US are/ les l iens entre l a CE et las Etats-Unis sont closer/plus d tmi ts , the sare/les m b s not as c l oseipas aussi dtroits

than ten years beforel qu'il y a dix ans n.a.id. k.-s.r./n.s.p.

5)(**)Satisfaction ui t h the way democracy works/ Satisfaction du fonction ment de la ddmrat ie satisf i ed/satisfait not staisfiedlpas satisfait d. k. /n.a. -s .r. /n. s. p.

........................

64

22

14 -----

39

24

37 _----

70 28

2 - - (*) Uolunteere&Spontam% (") This question refers t o the country o f the person interuiewed/btte question concerne Ze pays de l a parsonna inter- ("9 Question i n US-Suruey referred t o EC(11, t o the US gouernment(2), t o "Western Europe"(3,4)./ les questions dans l'enquit8 aux EUA concamement: l a C E ( 1 1 , Ze gouveme~ent d r i ca inO) , alfEurope de l'Ouesta(3,4).

I '

- 29 -

III YOUR OPIWIOII, HOW IMPORTANT ARE T H I S COUIIIRY'S T I E S WITH WESTERII EUROPE - WOULD YOU SAY THEY HATTER A GREAT DEAL, OR THAI THEY AREN'T VERY IIPORTAHT?

1 . M I T E R A GREAT DEAL 2 . AEEII'T IHPORTANT O CAN'T SAY

Only Luxembourg ( + 2 1 % ) and The Netherlands ( + 1 5 % ) deviate remarkably from the Eur'opean community average. The opinion that these ties do not matter a great deal is somewhat higher than the (one out of four) European Community'average in the United Kingdom ( + 5 % ) and in Germany ( + 3 % ) . 86% of United States citizens think their country's ties with Uest- ern Europe matter a great deal; one out of ten thinks the contrary (Table 4 section 3 ) .

A survey carried out in the United States in 1973 on behalf of the Commission Delegation in Washington allows for comparison over time of American'public opinion concerning ties with Western Europe:

HATTER A GREAT DEAL 65'2 86'2 AREN'T IHPORTA!lI 16% i oa

4'2 CAW'T SAY - 192 - TOTAL 100'2 1 00'2

It is obvious from these figures that Yestern Europe's importance has grown considerably in the eyes of the American public since 1973. This is not only a consequence of de- creasing "can't says" - probably also due to the priorities of United States mass media - but a definite change as the "not important" drop proves.

- 30 -

DO YOU THINK EUROPEAN COHHUWITY ' S TIES WITH UNITED STATES ARE CLOSER OR NOT AS CLOSE AS THEY YERE TER YEARS AGO?.

1 . CLOSER 2. NOT AS CLOSE o. ?

DO YOU THIRK OUR TIES WITH WESTERN EUROPE ARE CLOSER OR NOT AS CLOSE AS IHEY WERE TEN YEARS AGO?

1. CLOSEB 2. NOI AS CLOSE 3. SAHE (VOLUNTEERED) O. DON'T KNOW

Yet: while more Europeans think that those ties are closer today than they were ten years ago, than think they are not as close, a majority of the United States public today re- sents the Atlantic having become larger in politico-psycho- logical terms:

EC1 2 USA

CLOSER 43% 332 NOT AS CLOSE 292 532 SAHE (VOLUNTEERED) - 62 DOI'T KROW - 282 3

TOTAL 1002 1 O02

A closer look reveals: the real difference is in the hesi- tance of European Community citizens to express an opinion:

More than a quarter of EC citizens do not answer this question. Four out of ten Europeans see these ties as closer today; three out of ten as not as close as they were ten years ago. The non-response rate to the corresponding question in America was just 8 % . 43% of Americans who reply see their country's ties with Western Europe today as at least as close as they were ten years ago (Table 4 section 4). Al- though this figure is of the same order of magnitude on both

- 31 -

sides of the Atlantic, the percentage of Americans perceiv- ing a loosening of ties is almost twice as much as the respective European score.

How did Americans reply to this question in 1 9 7 3 , that is with reference to the year 1 9 6 3 1

TIES TODAY AND IEN YEARS A60

USA USA

1973 1987 CLOSER 312 331 NOT AS CLOSE 391 532 SAME (VOLUNTEERED 1 1 22 62

181 - 81 DON'T KNOW - IOTAL 1002 1002

Although the basic message appears to remain the same - the Americans see ties loosening and in greater numbers today than in 1973 - methodological remarks need t o be made by way of digression:

The 1973 US survey was done in personal (face to face) interviews, the 1 9 8 7 US-survey was done by telephone. Is the higher rate of "don't knows" in the USA in 1 9 7 3 and in the European Community today due to the physical presence of an interviewer as compared to one on the telephone - or have Americans become more outspoken?<8>

These doubts underline the weight of technical and organisa- tional details in survey research and remind us of the pru- dence necessary not to take each figure at its face value.

8) Ihe US-questionnaire contained the iten "same" not be read by the intervieuer (as marked: VOLUN- TEERED). It is methodologically intriguing in two senses: is the change of intervieu technique behind the drop in volunteered "sames"? In other words: do personal interviewers (less supervised than telephone interviewers during the intervieu) tickle interviewees explicitly or implicitly as soon as their questionnaire contains the (not to be read!) item? Suspicion cannot be ruled out. At least the fact that, by technical error, the EUROBAROHETER questionnaire did not contain the "same (volunteered)" item, raises doubts.. . . .

- 32 -

Nuclear physics or molecular chemistry like social science are not as hard sciences as mechanics. Consumers of survey research results should remain as conscious of this fact as producers . . . Analysts must do s o .

The following question was not asked in the European Commu- nity, only in the United States : "What do you think will be best for the United States, in the long run: to strengthen our ties with Western Europe, to continue our relations with Western Europe as they are now, or to reduce our ties with Western Europe?"

STRENGTHEN 532 CONTI NUE 312 REDUCE 112 DON'T KNOV - 52

TOTAL 1002

Conclusion: 843: of Americans think that "the best for the United States, in the long run, is to strengthen ties with Western Europe" or "to continue relations as they are now".

2.3 SUPPORT FOR EUROPEAN UNIFICATION

W I C H OF THE STATEHENTS ON THIS LIST HOST CLOSELY REFLECTS, IN YOUR OPINION, PRESENT UNITED STATES POLICY TOYARDS WEST EUROPEAN UNIFICATION? ( SHOW CARD)

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 ,

o. ?

IT SUPPORTS THE DEVELOPHENT OF A STRONG, EUROPE AND IS ACTIVELY YOPKING FOR IT IT SUPPORTS THE DEVELOPHEWT OF STRONG, NOT ACTIVELY VORIING FOR IT IT OPPOSES THE DEVELOPHENT OF A STRONG, EUROPE BUT IS UOT ACTIVELY WORKIN6 AGAINST IT IT OPPOSES THE DEVELOPHElT OF A STRONG, EUROPE AND IS ACTIVELY WORKING AGAINST IT

UNIFIED WESTERN

UNIFIED EUROPE BUT IS

UNIFIED UESTERU

UNIFIED WESTERN

- 33 -

One Community citizen in two believes the US Government sup- porta unification of Uestern Europe; a quarter thinks the contrary, another quarter does not reply.

WHAT, IN YOUR OPINION, IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNIIENT POLICY TOWARDS EUROPEAN UNIFIC6TION? WOULD YOU SAY THE UNITED STATES GOVERBHENT SUPPORTS OR OPPOSES THE DEVELOPlENT OF EUROPEAN UNIFICATION?

1. SUPPORTS 2. OPPOSES O. DON'T KNOW

Two US citizens out of three say their country's Government supports unification of Uestern Europe (Table 4 section 2 ,

Table A8). The questions were not worded in the same way. The EUROBAROMETER version was chosen for reasons of compara- bility over time. It could not be used in such an complex form for telephone interviewing as it was in the US-survey. Cross-continental comparison appears justified, nevertheless, but should be prudent:

TABLE 5ITableau 5

COIIPARISON OF EUROPEAN AWD AHEBICAN OPINION ABOUT US GOVERNHENT POLICY TOWARDS WESTERU EUROPEAN UNIFICATION/CONPARAI~N DE L 'OPINIO8 EUROPtEBN€ ET MtRXCAINE CONCERNANT LA POLITIQUE MtRICAIN€ A L'EGARD DE L'UNIFICA- TION OE I 'EUROPE OCCIDENTALE

The EUROBAROMETER standard question as to the interviewees' opinion towards "efforts being made to unify Western Europe" (cf. supra chapter 1 . 3 and Table B4) was put to the US public. The comparative outcome is the following:

- 34 -

EC1 2 USA

VERY MUCH FOP 332 272 TO SOME EXTENT FOR 442 382 TO SOME EXTENT AGAINST 72 132 VERY MUCH AGAINST 32 62 DON' T KNOY 132 1 72 TOTAL 1002 1002

Three in four Europeans and two in three Americans are f o r

"efforts being made" towards West European UNIFICATION; that is: more British are rrforvl than Americans, but more Ameri- cans than Danes < 9 > .

9 ) One European in tuo is "satisfied uith the uay democracy uorks in (his country)"; three Americans out of four are satisfied uith respect to their country (Table 4 section 5) . But Danes are almost as satisfied uith the way their democracy works than Americans with theirs, that is: both score uell above European Community average.

- 35 -

CHAPTER THREE

T H E F U T U R E O F T H E E U R O P E A N

c O m r î ~ P 4 ~ T v

Our data, based on a survey carried out before the end of November 1987 - i.e. on the eve of a predictably difficult summit in Copenhagen and its gloomy aftermath (and well b e f o r e t h e l a t e s t B r u s s e l s b reak through) < l o > - reveal some optimism as to the community's future . This is particularly so as regards replies to questions in the first section of this chapter from which it emerges that people are really prepared to go ahead for " 1 9 9 2 " .

But - in view of their national leaders' reluctance to act whenever they meet in the Council - do they really want to go further than the Single Harket? In which direction? Do they even want a European Government? Responsible for what policy areas? And: if they were prepared to go further, how important is "Europe" to the woman and the man in the street as compared to other issues and problems of her or his every-day life? Do people relate their everyday sorrows with (the progress of) Europe? Not all of these questions may be answered here, for lack of space, for lack of more indepth analyses still to be done - and for lack of answers to questions not yet put. But it is one of the key aims of the EUROBAROMETER surveys to contribute more precise answers to exactly these questions in the future.

10) - Editor's remark -.

- 36 -

3.1 SUPPORT FOR THE SINGLE EUROPEAN HARKET

ALTOGETHER DO YOU THINK THAI THE COIIIN6 INTO BEING OF THE SINGLE COHHON HARKET IN THE EUROPEAN COHiIUUITY IN 1 992 WILL BE A GOOD '

THING, A BAD THING OR EITHER GOOD NOR BAD?

1. A GOOD THING 2. A BAD THIN6 3 . EITHER GOOD NOR BAD o. ?

Hore than 90% of those who think that completing the Single European Harket by 1992 would make a difference see it as a good thing. It must, however, be kept in mind that one person out of four interviewed assesses completion of the Sin- gle Harket as "neither good nor bad" tone out of three in Germany and France). One out of eight do not reply ( 2 6 % in Portugal and 23% in Ireland). Only one out of seventeen regards R1992n as "a bad thing" (Table 6 ) .

TablelTableau 6: ATIITUDES OH THE SINGLE COHHON HARKET IN 1992 iby country, percentages)/¿es attitudes d l'&afd du grand Barche eurogen en i992 (par pcrys, pourcentages)

.------__--__------_-- A good thinglune bonne chose

Neither good nor bad/ ni banne ni m u w i s e

A bad thing/une rouvafse chose

d.k.-n.a./n.s.p.-s.r. . -_ -_ -_____-_- - - -_____

TOTAL . - - - -- ________- - ____- - llean score/ score royen tt)

(e) assigning 3 to "good thing", 2 to Oneither ... nor", 1 to "bad thing"; excluding d.k.-n.a./"knne chose. = 3, "ni bonne ni rauvoisf = 2, %m"se chose. = i ; non-rPponses exclues du calcul.

t

- 37 -

As to the occupation of people interviewed, most in favour of the Single Market are the "liberal professions" (71% of them think it to be "a good thing"), next come llstudentsrl ( 6 6 % of them), "higher civil servants and top management" ( 6 6 % ) . "white collar employees" ( 6 2 % ) and llself-employedvl ( 6 1 % ) . But there is also a majority of "blue collar workers" ( 5 4 % ) and of unemployed ( 5 7 % ) in favour of " 1 9 9 2 " .

As to "social class" as measured through the occupation of the head of the household of the person interviewed cil>,

upper, old middle and new middle class people think more often of " 1992" being "a good thing" (61% to 6 2 % ) than working class people. But among the latter there is still a majority of 5 4 % in favour < 1 2 > .

The "person in the street" addressed in public opinion polls, is more at ease with concrete questions. We therefore also put questions relating to ten different specific measures foreseen in the Single Market Programme.

THE COMING INTO BEING OF THE SINGLE COMMON EUROPEAN HARKET IN 1 992 WILL MEAN TAE FREE CIRCULATION OF PERSONS, GOODS AND

TAIS WILL WOPERTY NIIHIN THE EUROPEAH coir" COUNTRIES. SOME PEOPLE THINK

VANTAGE. CAN YOU TELL IE., FOR EACH ASPECT OF THIS SINGLE connoN EUROPEAN HARKET WHICH I M GOING TO MENTION, WHETHER rou PERSON-

BE MOSTLY M ADVANTAGE, OTHERS THINK IT WILL BE A DISAD-

ALLY THINK IT WILL BE AN ADVANTAGE OR A DISADVANTAGE?

11) Cf. technical specifications at the end of this report for details of operationalisation.

12) The correlations uith our Typology of European Attitudes "TEA", kf. supra 1.3) about "euro-positive" and "euro-indifferent" people is quite high: Pearson's r = .49 for "Single European Market good thing" vs. all other replies uith euro-positive attitudes vs. all other values of TEA;.Pearson's rz.40 for "SEM neither good nor. bad or don't know" VI. all other replies uith euro-indifferent attitudes vs. all other values of I E A . Both r are significant on the .O01 level.

- 38 -

1 .

2.

3 .

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9 .

ELIHINATION OF CUSTOH CONTROLS WHEN CROSSING FRONTIERS BETWEEN GOIMPIES INSIDE THE EUROPEAN COMUNITY THE OPPORTUNITY FOR AlIV CITIZEN OF A COUlIRY WITHIN THE EURO-

CODIRY OF THE COIIlllRITY, FOR IWSTAlCE TO RETIRE TEPE Op TO STUDY THERE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANY CITIZEN OF A COUNTRY WITHIN THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY TO GO AND WORK IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY THE POSSIBILITY TO BUY IN OIE' S OUI COUITRY ANY PRODUCT LAWFULLY SOLD IN OTHER COUPTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY BRINGING CLOSER TOGETHER THE RATES OF V. A. T. TAXI PRODUCTS ARE SOLD UPDER SIHILAR COST CONDITIONS THE ABILITY TO HAKE PAYHENTS WITHOUT COHPLICATION WITHIN THE UHOLE EUROPEA1 COHHUNITY THE ABILITY TO TAIE ANY MOUNT OF HONEY WITH YOU UHEN YOU TRAVEL TO OTHER COUIRRIES OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY THE POSSIBILITY TO OPEN A BANK ACCOUNT IN ANY COUNTRY OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY THE POSSIBILITY FOR A CONTRACTOR FROH ANOTHER COHHUNITY COUNTRY TO BE IN CHARGE OF PUBLIC WORKS ( FOR INSTANCE, BRIDGE OR A ROAD) THE SAHE LEVEL OF QUALITY

pun C~"ITY TO co am LIR MIIIOUT LIHITATION IU AIIY OTHER

( VALUE ADDED APPLIED IN THE VARIOUS COUNTRIES OF THE COHHUNITY SO THAT

BUILDING A IH OUR COUNTRY IF HIS OFFER IS CHEAPER AT

LABELS USED IN TABLES AND F16URES

I 11 BORDER CONTROL I 2) RESIDENCE I 31 YORK I 41 8W PRODUCTS ( 51 V.A.1 . CLOSER I 61 IIAKE PAYIIENTS

I 81 BUY PROPERTY ( 91 BANK ACCOUNT (101 PU8LlC YORKS

( 7) CARRY NOHEV

Up to 81% see such measures as 'Ian advantage". And even the "foreign contractort1 item (the only one not provoking at least a two thirds majority in favour) registered an overall majority of 5 4 % "advantage" versus 32% "disadvantage" (Table 7, Fig.7).

- 39 -

Table/Tableau 7: ADVANTAGES OF THE SINGLE COHHON EUROPEAN HARKET IN 1992

EC12

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The possibility to buy in one's own country any product lavfully sold in other countries of the European Community

(BUY PRODUCTS)

The ability to make payments uithout complication uithin the uhole European Comuni ty (HAKE PAYHENTS)

The opportunity for any citizen of a country within the European Community to go and vork in any other country of the European Community

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(YORK 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The opportunity for any citizen of a country uithin the European Community to go and live without limitation in any other country of the Cowunity for instance to retire there or to study there (RESIDENCE)

The possibility to take any amount of money uith you when you travel to other countries of the European Community

The possibility to open a bank account in any country of the European

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(CARRY HONEY) _________---_______-____________________--------*------------------------

Comuni ty (BANK ACCOUNT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The possibility to buy land or property throughout the Community

(BUY PROPERTY) __----------------------------------------------------------------------. Bringing closer together the rates of V.A.T. (Value added tax) applied in the various countries of the Community so that products are sold under siciliar cost conditions (V.A.T. CLOSER)

Eliaination of custom controls uhen crossing frontiers betueen countrie! inside the European Community

The possibility for a contractor fram another country to be in charge oj public uorks (for instance, building a bridge or a road) in our country if his offer is cheaper at the same level of quality [PUBLIC WORKS)

-_-__--_----_______-________L___________--------------------------------.

[BORDER CONTROL) __-------__---____------------------------------------------------------.

- 40 -

FIGURE 7

ADVANTAGES OF THE SINGLE- COMMON EUROPEAN MARKET

(percent "advantage", EC1 2) *

BW PRODUCTS 81%

MAKE PAYMENTS 80%

WORK 80%

RESIDENCE 79z

CARRY MONEY 79%

BUY PROPERTY 69%

VAT. CLOSER 69%

BORDER COMROL 67%

PUBUC WORKS 54%

don't now/no anawar proportionr vary, from item to item. between 7% and 16% of interviewed.

This battery of questions asked in twelve countries produced an impressive result: 117 rrYesrl (i.e. advantage) majorities out of 1 2 0 questions put, even if there is some variation among member countries as to where their preferences are strongest (Table 8 ) .

A breakdown of the answers to our l'ten measures f o r 1992" question by socio-demographic categories on the Community level provides little surprise. Differences between women and men are most pronounced (and statistically significant) with respect to l'border control" ( 7 x 1 , "make payments", "bank accountv1 and "public works1' (6% each), men being more in favour each time. The younger age group (up to 2 4 ) are (still?) less interested in getting rid of "border controlsv1 ( S i difference compared to those aged 25 and over). A s to all other measures (except **public works" with no differ-

- 41 -

Table/Tableau 8: ADVANTAGES OF THE SIN6LE COlON EUROPEAN HARKET [rank order by country, percentages)/ les avantages du grand Mrchd europden (par mys dropres le rang, pourcentages)

BELGIPUE

residence buy products carry money border control make payments vork V.A.T. closer bank account buy property public vorks

80 80 79 77 75 74 72 71 66 46

ELLAS

residence carry money buy products border control vork make payments bank account V.A.T. closer buy property public vorks

77 76 74 73 69 67 67 67 61 51

IRELAND . vork residence V.A.T. closer carry money make payments buy products bank account border control buy property public uorks

87 85 78 78 78 76 74 72 64 50

NEDERLAND

V.A.T. closer sake payaents residence buy products vork carry money border control buy property bank account public works

82 81 78 71 75 72 65 65 65 53

DMHARK

V.A.T. closer make payments carry money residence uork buy products border control bank account public works. buy property

75 73 69 62 62 59 56 43 38 27

ESPANA

uork residence buy products border control make payments carry money bank account buy property V.A.T. closer public uorks

79 77 75 75 69 68 66

- 65 57 57

ITALIA

vork residence buy products make payments V.A.T. closer carry money buy property bank account border control public vorks

91 88 87 85 76 76 73 68 62 56

PORTUGAL

vork residence border control buy products bank account carry money buy property make payments public vorks V.A.T. closer

88 85 81 78 75 74 73 71 59 59

DEUTSCHLAND

carry money 83 residence 82 make payments 82 buy products 81 border control 79 buy property 73 bank account 73 uork 69 V.A.T. closer 59 public works 51

FRAICE

carry money vork buy products make payments V.A.T. closer residence buy property bank account border control public works

87 87 86 86 85 83 71 69 67 60

LUXEMBURG

buy products carry money make payments residence bank account buy property vork border control V.A.T. closer public uorks

91 91 89 84 80 75 73 70 52 45

UNITED KINGDOM

make payments carry money vork buy products bank account buy property residence V.A.T. closer public vorks border control

80 .79 78 75 75 67 66 63 51 47

- 42 -

ence), the youngest are even more convinced of the advantages of the Single Harket than those aged 25 and more. More llEuropeanll in general, the formally better educated and the "opinion leaders" - no surprise - see even more advantages in 11199211 as compared to the other groups in the respective categories (Table A 9 ) .

3.2 GOING EVEN FURTHER?

ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF 60IN6 EVEN FURTHER THAN THE SINGLE COHHON EUROPEAN HARKET TOYARDS THE UNIFICATIOl OF EUROPE?

1. YES 2. NO o. ?

One in four does not reply. Six Europeans out of ten say "yes" among those who do reply (Table 9 ) < 1 3 > .

Table/Tableau 9: GOIR6 FURTHER THAN THE SINGLE COHHON HARKET? (by country, percentages)/llller plus loin que la rdalisation du grand mrchd euroen? (par pays, pourcentages)

13) The correlations uith our Typology of European Attitudes "TEA" tcf. supra, chapter 1.3) about "euro-positive", "euro-negative" and "euro-indifferent" people is quite high: Pearson's r= .40 for "yes" vs. all other replies to this question uith euro-positive attitudes vs. all other values of TEA; r= .28 for no ansuer to this question uith euro-indifferent attitudes vs. all other values of TEA. Both r are significant at the ,001 level.

- 43 -

Those having said rryesrr we asked:

IN WHICH DIRECTION MAINLY?

1 . 2. A STE016 COHHON DEFENCE 3. A SIIGLE COHMOI CUPREICY 4. 5. OTHER o. 7

A POLITICAL UIIOI AMON6 THE HEMBEB STATES

A TRUE COOPEPATIOI II SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOCY

LABELS USED IN TABLES AND FIGURES

( 1 ) POLITICAL UNION (2) CONNON DEFENCE 13) connon CURRENCY (4) COOPERA TIO^ scr MO TEC# (51 OTHER (OI DON'T KNW

Two thirds chose "real cooperation in science and technology", one in two "a common Currency" (Fig. 81. Most in favour of a "strong common defence" [ e r e the British, the Greeks, the Danes and the French. A "political union among the Member States" is, most popular in Germany, Spain and Ireland ( 1 ) (Table 1 0 ) .

..

FIGURE 8

GOING FURTHER THAN THE SINGLE COMMON EUROPEAN MARKET: IN WHICH DIRECTION MAINLY?

(EC12) *

COMMON CURRENCY

p o u n u UNION

OMER I J %

DON'T KNOW I S %

percent af those approving of gaing further (48% af 011 intenilewesa).

- 44 -

Table/Tableau 10: 601116 FURTHER THAN THE SINGLE COHHOY HARCET? IN MICH DIRECTION MAINLY? (rank order by country, percentagesl/llller plus l o h pue l a dallsatlon du grand larch4 euro~den? Dans quelle dfrectfon prfncfpolerent (par pays d’aprPs le rang, pourcentages)

DANHUK DEUTSCHLAND BELGIQUE . Conon currency 61 Coop. SciiTech 79 Coop. SciaTech 69 Coop. SciLTech 56 Conon Currency 52 Pol i t i ca l Union 48 Conon defence 36 Conon defence 44 Coilan currency 44 Pol i t i ca l Union 36 Pol i t i ca l Union 31 Coron defence 32 Others 2 Others 2 Others 3 n. a. /d. k. 5 n.a./d.k. 5 n. a. /d. k. 1

ELLAS

Coop. SciaTech 60 Coron defence 49 Pol i t i ca l Union 47 Conon currency 46 Others n. a. /d. k. 5

IRELAND

Coop. SciaTech 52 C m o n currency 47 Pol i t i ca l Union 45 Comon defence 35 Others 2 n. a. /d. k. 3

IIEDERLAlD

Coop. SciaTech 72 Conon currency 40 Pol i t i ca l Union 32 . Coron defence 22 Others 7 n. a. /d. k. 3

ESPANA

Coop. SciaTech 59 Pol i t i ca l Union 47 Conon currency 37 Conon defence 31 Others 2 n. a. /d. k. 9

ITALIA

Coop. SciCTech 64 Conon currency 53 Pol i t i ca l Union 44 Conon defence 32 Others 1 n. a. /d. k. 2

PORTUGAL

Coop. SciCTech 44 Pol i t i ca l Union 42 Conon defence 37 Conon currency 34 Others 2 n. a. /d. k. 8

FRANCE

Coop. SciaTech 70 Conon currency 68 Conon defence 42 Pol i t i ca l Union 36 Others 4 n. a. /d. k. 1

LUXEHBURG

Comon currency 64 Coop. SciaTech 60 Pol i t i ca l Union 54 Couon defence 35 Others 2 n. a. /d. k. 2

UNITED KINGDOH . Coop. SciaTech 58 Conon defence 55 Pol i t i ca l Union 41 Conon currency 34 Others 3 n. a. /d. k. 5

- 4 5 -

More men than women, more middle-aged (and young) than those aged 55 and older, more of the formally better educated, more of the well-off; more opinion leaders, more with a

"post-materialist" value orientation, and more who place themselves on the left (within their respective country's political spectrum) are in. favour of going even further than the Single Harket towards European unification (Table A101.

3.3 A EUROPEAN GOVERNHENT?

A series of questions on behalf of the "Transpartisan Feder- alist Group for a European Union of the European Parliament" was put in the framework of our EUROBAROMETER no 28 sur- veycl4>.

ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST THE FORIATION OF A EUROPEAN GOVERNHENT RE- SPONSIBLE TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT?

1. FOR 2. AGAINST o. 7

Twice as many of those who replied said "yes" than said "no" (Map 1 , Table 1 1 1 .

14) This set of questions uas sponsored by a number of neus papers: "La Libre Belgique", "La Vanguardia" ,'Le Figaro", "La Repubblica", and "The Tires".

- 46 -

MAP 1

A EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT? (percent in favour of those who reply) I

Percent 'No OplnlonTNo Antwer'

- 47 -

TableIIableau 1 1 : FOR OR AGAINST A EUROPEAN GOVERNHENT? (by country, percentaqes)/Pour ou contre un Sowernerent Europt!en? (par pays, pourcentagesl

Those giving a favourable response were prompted further:

AMONG THE FOLLOYING , YHICH SHOULD BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF. THE EUROPEAN GOVERNHENT?

1 . SECURITY/ DEFENSE 2. ENVIBONHENT 3. CURRENCY 4. COOP THIRD YORLD 5. EXTERNAL RELATIONS 6. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY O. DON ' T KNOYN

"Protection of the environment", "scientific and technological research", and "security, defence" take the lead for the Community as a whole (Fig. 9 ) with 60% responses or more. The sequence of priority does not differ much from country to country. It is noteworthy, however, that, among respondents in favour of a European government, the protection of the environment comes first in Denmark, Germany, The Nether- lands and Luxembourg, while security and defence come first in France and in the 'United Kingdom (Table 1 2 ) .

- 48 -

Table/Tableau 12: THE POLICY AREAS YHICH SHOULD BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A EUROPEAN GOVERNIENT (by country,percentages)/Les dorafnes puf devrafent etre pris en charge par le Gauvernerent Europien (par pays, pourcentages)

BELGIQUE

science & tech 63 security/defence 60 envi ronaen t 53 external relations 49 currency 46 coop third uorld 40 n. a. /d. k. 2

ELLAS

security/defence 60 environien t 58 currency 52 security/defence 49 coop third uorld 37 external relations 33 n. a. /d. k. 2

IRELAND

science & tech 53 secnrityldefence 50 environment 47 coop third uorld 43 currency 41 :

external relations 36 n. a. /d. k. 4

NEDERLAND

environien t 79 security/defence 54 science & tech 52 external relations 48 coop third uorld 48 currency 40 n. a. /d. k. 1

DANMARK

environment . 85 science b tech 70 security/defence 69 external relations 50 currency 49 coop third uorld 48 n. a. /d. k. 3

ESPANA

science b tech 58 security/defence 58 environnent 57 coop third uorld 52 external relations 39 currency 35 n.a.1d.k. 6

ITALIA

science h tech 56 environment 56 security/defence 53 external relations 37 coop third uorld 34 currency 32 n.a./d.k. 1

PORTUGAL

environnent 51 security/defence 40 coop third uorld 39 science f tech 31 currency 21 external relations 24 n. a. /d. k. 6

DEUTSCHLAND

environnen t 82 science & tech 66 external relations 58 security/defence 57 currency 51 coop third uorld 51 n. a. /d. k. 3

FRANCE

security/defence 72 science & tech 67 currency 60 environment 49 external relations 42 coop third uorld 37 n. a. /d. k. 1

LUXEIBURG

environien t 78 science 6 tech 72 security/defence 60 currency 59 external relations 51 coop third uorld 45 n.a. /d. k.

UNITED KINGDOI

security/defence 64 environnent 62 science & tech 57 external relations 53 coop third uorld 50 currency 32 n.a./d. k. 2

- 49 -

Figure 9

WHAT A EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR (EC1 2)*

ENWRONMENT 61X

SCIENCE k TECHNOLOGY 60X

SECURITY/DEFENCE 60X

E X E R N K RELAnONS 1-144X

CURRENCY 1-1 43%

COOP 3RD WORLD l I l 4 2 ~

DON'TKNOW 42~ percent of those in favour of a responsible Eumpeon Government (49% of oll interviewees).

A breakdown by socio-political profile of respondents reveals, for the Community as a whole, that out of the age group of 55 and over only 45% are for a "European Govern- ment". Whereas, those placing themselves on the llleftll of their country's political spectrum, are significantly more numerous to opt for such a "European Government responsible to the EP" (Table A l l l . A l l other socio-demographic , socio- political and socio-cultural categories presented show those well known differences they always disclose in matters of Europe (cf. EUROBAROMETER Report No 27, p. 34f).

Two thirds of those who see the completion of the Single Eu- ropean Market by 1992 as Ira good thing" are "in favour of a European government responsible to the European Parliament".

There is a very high correlation on the level of the individual for the total sample (weighted) between people who

- 50 -

are "in favour of going further than the Single Market towards European unificationv1 and "for a European government responsible to the EPV1<15>.

Looking at the answers to the questions about llin which direction mainly" the Community should go "beyond the Single Market" on the one hand (Fig. 8 ) and to the question about "what should become the responsibility of a European government"(Fig. 9 ) on the other, a considerable analogy emerges. Before wondering about the nevertheless obvious differences ( f o r example "currencyT1 49% versus 4 4 % ) one must remember that details of question wording are of considerable signif- icance in public opinion surveys: The government responsibilities question spoke of "the currency" and contained, of course, the stimulus llEuropean government". The further direction question spoke of l'a single common currency" and did not contain the stimulus "European government". The government question, presenting "security and defence" as first item obtained 60% (55% among those placing themselves on the left of their respective countryvs political spectrum]. The direction question presented **a strong common defence" as second item without néither stimulus "government responsible to Parliament" seconds earlier nor the stimulus llsecurity". As a technical term "security" has domestic implications - as well as is it - with respect to its international meaning - a wider concept, including, connotatively, "military defence" as well as "disarmement". For the communalities and differences in the answers to these two questions with respect t o the socio-political profile of the respondents see Tables A 1 0 and A l l .

15) Pearson's r = .49, significant at the .O01 level. The corresponding correlation between respective country's scores is equally impressive Pearson's r = .85, R fact that is statistically not astonishing,

- 51 -

MAP 2

A European Union Now? (percent in favour of those who reply)

Psrconl 'No OplnlonTNo Anwer'

- 52 -

E

.---

18

14

37

101 ----

3.4 A EUROPEAN UNION NOU?

F IEL

---.

63 34

22 34 2 2 2

14 29

101 99 ___- ---.

SUPPOSE THAT A IIAJORITY OF THE TUELVE COUNTRIES BELONGING TO THE EUEOPEAN COIIHUNITY AGREE ON THE FORHATIOY OF A EUROPEAN UNION, BUT Til0 OR THREE COUNTRIES DISAGREE. DO YOU THINK THAT THE COUNTRIES UHO AGREE SHOULD CREATE THIS EUROPEAN UNION AIION6 THEIISELVES, OR DO YOU THINK THEY SHOULD ABANDON THE PROJECT?

1 . CREATE A EUROPEAN UNION 2. ABANDON THE PROJECI 3. OTHER ( SPONTANEOUS) SPECIFY o. ?

Among the 792 taking a stand on "a European Union now" twice as many are in favour of rather than abandoning the pro- jectcl6>(Map 2 ) . There is a majority in favour of l'a Euro- pean union nowTT in all countries but three: the Danes are very strongly against ( 2 0 : 64%). the British strongly (33 : 49%). the Irish (34 J: 34%) are evenly split (Table 1 3 ) <17>.

Table/Iableau 13: A EUROPEAN UYION NOU? (by country,percentages)/ l'union europlenne rafntenantl (POP pays, pourcentages)

t

16) This question put by the "Intergroupe Féderaliste pour l'Union Européenne du Parlement Européen. uas sponsored by the Directorate General for Information and Public Relations of the European Parliament.

17) The correlations uith our Typology of European Attitudes YEA" (cf. supra 1.3) about neuro-positive" "euro-indifferent' and "euro-negative. people is as follous: Pearson's r = .34 for "create a European union nou" vs. all other replies uith euro-positive attitudes vs. all other values of TEA Pearson's r : .24 for "don't knou. uith respect to this question vs. all other replies uith euro-indifferent attitudes vs. all other values of TEA. Both r are significant at the .O01 level.

- 53 -

We must, however, pour some water into the wine of such en- couraging figures. All of them show that more or less big majorities of the public in most member states are generally in favour of more, even much more, European unification than now exists or than what their representatives in the Euro- pean Council are accomplishing. But we have to be careful when interpreting these results.

These results tend to indicate a willingness to accept, to' support, or to follow initiatives being undertaken by gov- ernmental institutions or by political groups; they do not press such opinion, to do something themselves, over the heads of and even against the national political groups, parties, leaders or institutions that enjoy their tradi- tional support.

Consensus about llEuropell and about "more of it" is more per- missive, acceptive, benevolent than demanding, challenging, pressing or pushing.

l'Brussels 1988" may go down in history as showing that there is always a "Fontainebleau" after each llAthensll.

\

- 55 -

CHAPTER FOUR

T H E E U R O P E A N P A R L I A M E N T T O D A Y

A N D T O M O R R O W

4.1 PUBLIC AUARENESS AND GENERAL IHPRESSION

HAVE YOU RECENTLY SEEN OR HEARD IN THE PAPERS, OR ON THE RADIO OR TV, ANYTHING ABOUT THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT 7 THAT IS THE PARLIAHENTARY ASSEHBLY OF THE EUROPEAY COHHUNITY ( OR COHHON HARKET) 7

1. YES 2. NO o. 7

Awareness of the European Parliament remains relatively stable (Fig. 101, due to rising scores in Denmark (up 15 percentage points at the time of that country's presidency of the Council), Ireland tup 13 percentage points after the referendum on the Single European Act), Portugal (up 10 percentage points after their European election), the United Kingdom (up 4 percentage points, linked perhaps to Lord Plumb being EP President) - in spite of considerable drops in Germany (down 91 and the Netherlands (down 8 ) (Tables A 1 2 , B9) < 1 8 > .

18) The figures of the Spring survey 1987 in fables B9, Blo, Bl1 and Bl2 have been omitted by technical error. For respective figures see EUROBAROHETER report no 27, pp 89 -104.

\

- 56 -

FIGURE 10

PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT x

100

80

10

t t -/- It t It It t

EC10 EC1 2 o c : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : (

07 O8 O9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 77 77 78 78 79 79 80 80 81 81 82 82 85 83 84 84 85 85 86 86 87 87

HAS WAT YOU READ OP HEARD GIVEN YOU A GEIEPALLY FAVOURABLE OR UNFAVOURABLE I W R E S S I O U OF THE EUROPEAU PARLIAIIENT?

1. GENERALLY FAVOURABLE IWRESSIOII 2 . GEIERALLY IUFAVOURABLE IIIPRESSIOI 3 . NEITHER FAVOURABLE IOR UNFAVOURABLE ( VOLUNTEERED 1 o . 7

Parliament's image has never been as pos tive as ,n autumn 1987; more than two out of three who recently heard or read about it in the media and take a definite stand say they had "a favourable impression". Spain and Portugal contribute heavily to this average figure for the Community as a whole since they elected their representatives to Strasbourg just a few months before our survey. But also among the ten countries that formed the Community until 1985, the image of the

- 57 -

E

--- 35 60

45 26 12 9

--- O0 O0

145 139

---

European Parliament was never higher than today: 63% of those who read or heard about it (and take a stand) report a "favourable impression" (See Tables 14, B l o ; cf supra 1.5,

F IRL

---- _ _ _ _ 40 47 44 62

33 24 37 18 18 23 15 17

8 9 6 5 4 3

100 100 100 100

453 361 469 392

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

---- ----

Tab1 /Tableau 14: IHPRESSION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT - HAVING SEE! OR HEARD SOHETHIWG (by country, percentages)/ L'hpressfon qu'on a sur le Parlerent EuropPen - d'apr&s ce 9u'on a lu ou entendu (par pays, pourcentages)

I L

--- 50 61

20 18 25 17

--- O0 o1

O1 77

_ _ _

6EwERALLY FAVOURABLE/

NEITHER FAVOURABLE - i d UNFAVOURABLE/

GENERALLY UNFAVOURABLE/

plutdt bonne

ni bonne - nf rawafse plutdt rawof se d.k.-n.a./n.s.p.-s.r.

---- 22 28

37 36 35 34

5 6 5 3

100 101

190 181

----

_ _ _ _

s 33 A 42

s 35 A 33 s 24 A 20 S 8 A 5

s 100 A 100

S 471 A 478

---- ----

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

- - DK

I - - -

20 18

27 39 41 36 12 7

I O0 I O0

137 i04

.---

.---

- (*) S: Spring/prfntemps; A: Auturn/autoane

- - D

_ _ _ 19 32

35 40 44 27

2 1

O0 O0

i55 142

.---

.___

- -

NL

--- 17 31

26 19 50 42 7

- 8

O0 O0

197 126

.---

.---

- -

- - P

--- 58 65

21 25

6 5

15 6

O0 o1

t49 i45

I _ _ _

. ___

-

Fig 6 and 6 A for variation across member states and comparison with the Commission and its image).

-~

- 58 -

4 . 2 PARLIAHENT'S ROLE: AS SEEN, AS DESIRED

HOW IHPORTANT WOULD YOU SAY, IS THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT IN THE LIFE OF THE EUROPEAN COHHUWITY NOWADAYS?

1. VERY IHPORTANT 2. IHPORTANT 3. NOR VERY IHPORTANT 4. NOT IHPORTANT AT ALL o. ?

WOULD YOU, PERSONALLY, PREFER THAT THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHEfiT PLAYED A HORE OR A LESS IHPORTANT PART THAU IT DOES IIOW?

1. HORE IHPOPTAlIT 2. LESS IHPORTANT 3 . ABOUT THE SAHE ( VOLUNTEERED) o. ?

Parliament's role "in the life of the Community nowadays" has never been assessed as "important" or "very important" to a greater degree than in 1987. The autumn 1987 score drops slightly, however, to 64% from 67% since past spring among those who reply (Tables 15, B11). Nevertheless: one in two Europeans would like to see Parliament play a still "more important part" than it does nowadays (Tables 16,

B12).

4.3 IF THERE YERE A EUROPEAN ELECTION TOHORROY...?

Experience from 1979 and 1984 shows tcf. EUROBAROMETERs nos 12 and 22) that slightly fewer people actually did vote in European elections than said they "certainly would" when interviewed before campaign. Except for Germany, where those who said they would "probably go and vote" had to be included in order to arrive at a close estimate. In France, on

- 59 -

.-.i

Table/Tableau 15: IIPORTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIMENT IN THE LIFE OF THE EUROPEAN COlIUHITY (by countryl percentages)/l'frportance du rdle actuel du Parlerent europkn dans la vfe Communauté europPenne (par pays, pourcentages)

_I _.

B

---- 14 10 42 44 24 27 5 6 15 14

1 O0 101

2.74 2.6I

----

---.

- -

_. _I

DK

---- 24 17 31 42 14 14 4 7 27 21

1 O0 101

3.02 2.87

---.

_ _ _ _

- -

- - D

-..-- 7 5 33 34 34 35 10 10 16 15

1 O0 99

2.44 2.4(

---.

---.

7 -

- - 6R

---- 23 23 45 42 13 13 4 4 15 19

1 O0 1 o1

3.01 3 .O1

---.

---.

- -

- I_

E

---. 23 27 38 36 9 9 3 3 27 26

1 O0 101

3.11 3 . t i

---.

----

- -

- - F

13 10 51 51 21 23 3 2 12 14

1 O0 1 O0

2.8! 2.81

___.

___.

- -

- - IRL

---. 26 24 44 43 11 14 2 4 17 16

1 O0 101

3.1; 3.0;

---.

---.

- -

_. _.

I

---. 17 15 40 43 23 26 1 3 16 13

1 O0 1 O0

2.81 2.M

---.

---.

- -

- - L

14 1 1 48 55 28 15 5 4 5 16

100 1 o1

2.77 2.87

----

----

- -

- - NL

---- lo 7 39 38 37 34 5 6 9 15

1 O0 1 O0

2.59 2.54

----

----

- -

- - P

--..e

17 22 40 36 4 5 1 1 38 36

1 O0 1 O0

3.17 3.22

I - - - -

.----

- - (9 S: Springlprhterps, A: Autumn/autome

Table/Tableau 16: DESIRED FUTURE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAIENT (by country,percentages)/fe rdle 'souhaf te pour le Parlerent europPen (par pays,pourcentages)

- - UK

. - - - -

20 13 40 41 25 28 6 6 13 12

1 O0 1 O0

2.84 2.70

.----

.----

- -

UK

.---. 35 36 20 24 28 24 17 16

1 O0 1 O0

2.01 2.1!

.---.

____.

- -

- - EC1 2

.---- 16 13 40 41 23 25 5 16 16 16

1 O0 1 O0

2.79 2.74

.----

.----

- -

- - EC1 2

----- 47 50 18 19 12 10 23 20

1 O0 99

2.17 2.50

-----

- - (*) S: Spring/pffnterps; A: Autumn/autome

- 60 -

the other hand, the actual turnout rate had been considerably lower than the percentage of interviewed having said they would "certainly go and vote".

IF TAERE RUE TOHOUROW U ELECTION FOR THE EUROPEU PAULIAHEBT, WOULD YOU CERTAINLY 60 AND VOTE, PROBABLY 60 AND VOTE, PROBABLY WOULD NOT 60, CERTAINLY YOULD nor GO?

1 . 2 . 3 . PROBABLY YOULD NOT 60 4. CERTAIWLY WOULD NOT 60 5 . IT DEPENDS ( VOLUNTEERED)

WOULD CERTAINLY 60 AND VOTE WOULD PROBABLY 60 AND VOTE

"If there were European Elections tomorrow ...", the number of those who say they "would certainly go and vote" has increased in seven countries (DK, D, E, I, L, P, UK), decreased in two (F, NL), and remained stable in three (B, GR, IRLI as compared to spring 1987 <19> (Table 17). T h i s i s not a f o p e c a s t o f turnout f o r the 198P European E l e c t f o n l Opin- ion surveys are nothing but "snapshots" of the climate of opinion at the time they are done. As experience has so often shown, this climate is different depending on whether elections are imminent or not. Experience has also shown that when European elections are imminent, domestic political issues tend to transform them into "national second order elections" with quite low effective turnout rates. The battle for a more than 50% turnout rate in 1989 is far from won and there is reason to increase research into European election turnout motivations soon enough to make use of the results before June 1989 (For detailed analysis of declared intention to participate in European Elections cf. EURO- BAROMETER Report No 27, pp 5 4 - 6 0 ) .

19) Ih is question vas put on behalf of the Coi i s s ion of the European Conunities.

- 61 -

Table/Tableau 17: I

"IF THERE WAS A EUROPEAN ELECTION TOMORROW.. .?" (percentages of those intervierued)/ V ì 1 y avoìt demln une LIlectìon europdenne.. .P (pourcentages des riponses obtenues1

:urnout in 98411aux de mrtìcìpatlon iuropean ilec tion/ Yection urophne

.------*------

B 92 DI 52 D 57 6R 77

F 57 IRL 48 I 83 L 89 NL 51 p --- us 33

E _ _ _

SAID THEY WOULD "CERTAINLY" GO AND VOTE IF/ "VOTERAIENT CERTAINEMENT SI.. ."

European European' National European Elec tion/ Election/ Elec tion/ Election/ Electìon Nectìon E 1 ectìon €1 ectìon europlenne europlenne nationale eump4enne

Spring/ Spring/ Spring/ Autumn/ prìntenps prìntenps prìntenps autonne

1984 1987 1987 1987

32 50 58 (*)

60 47 53 40 67 45 50 30 31

38 82 84 74 58 68 62 75 65 80 48 70

31 57 65 (*)

66 50 48 38 71 53 45 39 34

(*) percentages of those uho said they uould "certainly" or "probably" go and vote (cf. full reportllpourcentoges des personnes oyont dLIclarP qu'elles voteraient Sertalnerent" ou nproklesentn tvofr rapport fntdgral).

4.4 UHAT ABOUT A REAL PARLIAHENT?

The EP Federalist Intergroup for a European Union (cf. supra 3 . 3 f ) put two further questions within their series.

ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HAVING POWER TO PASS LAWS THAI WILL APPLY DIRECTLY IN ALL MEMBER COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN COMIIUHITY, THAT IS IN (YOUR COUNTRY) AS WELL AS ELSEWHERE?

1. FOE 2. AGAINST o. ?

- 62 -

DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE IDEA THAT THE IlEu EUROPEAN PARLIA- HEllT TO BE ELECTED IN 1989 SHOULD HAVE THE JOB OF PREPARING THE DRAFT OF A CONSTITUTIOU FOR A EUROPEAN URION?

1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE o. ?

The results are equally impressive: one in two EC citizens, that is two thirds of those who answer this question want the European Parliament to have "the power to pass laws that will directly apply ín all member countries". And six out of ten , that is 81% of those who reply, say that "the Parlia- ment elected in 1989 should have the job of drafting a constitution for the European union" (See Map. 3, Table 18).

Among the electorates of the various EP parliamentary party groups as constituted by representatives of national po-

. litical part-ies, this goal encounters strongest support among RDE (71%). ARC (68%). COM (66%). DR (66x1, and LDR (64%). Lowest are ED (44%) and electorates of parties not represented in the EP (52%) as well as those 29% of the total sample who refuse to indicate a (national) voting intention ( 5 2 % for a draft constitution). In the middle ground we find CTDI (63'c), S (62%), PPE and NI (both 61%)(Table A13)<20>. It is not astonishing that bigger and often quite "European" parties such as Christian Democrats and Social- ists score lower, here. They usually catch a bigger portion of the generally less politicised electorate. And, as we showed repetitively, these citizens are ta) more often "euro-indifferent" and (b) do not disclose their party preference in public opinion polls carried out in times when no elections are imminent.

20) The EP-group labels are taken fror official List of Members of the European Parliament dated Octo- ber 1987. All figures given for party electorate are based on all respondents per declared voting intention (no opinionho ansuer to "draft constitution" question are not excluded fror percentage calculation). See also end of appendix B for technical specifications of measurement.

- 63 -

Table/Tableau 18: HEU POUERS FOR THE EUROPEAN PARLIAIIEHT? (by country, percentages)/CorpPtences nouvel Jes pour Je Parlerent europPen? (par pays, pourcentages)

I

- 64 -

MAP 3

EP TO DRAm CONSTITUTION FOR EUR. UNION (percent in favour of those who reply)

Percent 'No OplnlonTNo Answer

- 6 5 -

CHAPTER FIVE

E U R O P E A N S O C I C S L CSND P O L I C Y

I S S U E S

In the framework of the EUROBAROMETER No. 2 8 survey, several special studies were conducted on behalf of the European Parliament (cf. supra 4 . 1 - 4 . 3 1 , of the "Intergroupe Fdd4raliste" of the EP (cf. supra 3 . 3 , 3 . 4 , 4.4) and of various specialised services of the Commission: a measurement of the initial impact of the campaign for the Commission's "Programme for the Prevention of Cancervv < 2 1 > ; a study on the awareness and perceived utility of the Commission sponsoring European sporting events ( 2 2 ) ; a study on Europeans and Aid to Development < 2 3 > a study on Problems of the Young, with particular focus on matters of training and unemployment < 2 4 > , and a study on Europeans and the Energy Problem ~ 2 5 , .

Detailed results will be presented in special reports in due course. Several questions of general interest have been sub- jected to a rough preliminary analysis so they could feature in early, illustrative form among the results of the present report.

21) On behalf of the Directorate General

22) On behalf of the Directorate General

23) On behalf of the European Consortium

24) this study is based on a special

Informat ion, Communicat ion, Cul ture.

Inf omat ion , Communicat ion, Cul ture.

for Agricultural Development.

extension of the sample among people aged 15 to 24 years.. Preliminary results given here are based on the standard sample only. It has been carried out on behalf of the Directorate Generel for Employment, Sociel Affairs and Education of the Commission.

25) On behalf of the Directorate General for Energy of the Commission.

- 66 -

5.1 THE EUROPEAN PROGRAHHE TO FIGHT CANCER

H A V E YOU RECENTLY READ OR HEARD ANYTHIN6 ABOUT A EUROPEAN PRO6EAHHE FOR FIGHT AGAINST CANCER?

1. YES 2. NO o. 7

Shortly after its start in early October 1 9 8 8 < 2 6 > , less than four Europeans out of ten had heard anything about a European Programme to Fight Cancer. Respective scores are particularly low in Greece ( 2 8 % ) and in the Northern Member States - 2 5 % or less: United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark (Map 4, Table A141. Continuous monitoring in the framework of future EUROBAROMETER surveys will allow.for precise measurement of the full impact of this campaign with regard to people's attitudes and behaviour re- lated to health.

5 . 2 SHOULD THE COHHUNITY SPONSOR SPORTS?

IN THE COURSE OF THE LAST YEAR THE EUROPEAN COIIIIUNITY HAS SPONSORED SEVERAL BI6 INTERNATIONAL SPORTING EVENTS. HERE IS A LIST OF SOHE OF THESE EVEHTS. COULD YOU TELL HE YHICH ONES YOU HAVE READ SOIIETHING ABOUT II THE HEPSPAPERS OR YOU HEARD ABOUT ON THE PAD10 OR TELEVISION?

26) See also the first report on the extensive study conducted uithin the fraieuork of the EUROBAROHE- TER no 27 survey: Europe Against Cancer, published on 8 October 1987.

- 67 -

MAP 4

EC-PROGRAMME AGAINST CANCER (percent having read or heard about it)

- 68 -

1 . M E EUROPEN COMUUITY UEIGHT-LIFTING CHMPIOHSHIP, ATHENS, APRIL 2. THE EUROPEAN COIIWITY SYIIIIIIRG CHAIIOIOSHIPS, LEEDS, APRIL 3. THE CONSIIIUIIOU RACE (TRANSAILAHIIC YACHI RACE) UIEUYPOORI-

4. THE ROUND EUROPE YACHT RACE, THE HAGUE-SAN PEIIO, JULY-AUGUST 5. THE EUROPEAY SABENA GOLF TROPHY, ANIYERP, AUGUST 6. THE TOUR OF TE EUROPEAN COIIUNITY (CYCLING), RONE-BRUSSELS,

7. THE EUROPEN COIIUNITY CHAIPIONSH~PS [TENNIS), ANIYERP, OCTOBER-

8. OIHER REPLIES o. ?

PHILADELPHIA, HAY - JUNE

SEPIEIBER

NOVEIBEP

IN YOUR OPINION DO THESE SPORTING EVEYTS HELP TO MAKE THE EUROPEAN c o i i u m BETTER KNOYH : A LOT, A LITTLE, OR nor AT ALL?

1 . A LOT 2. A LITTLE 3. NOI AT ALL o. ?

IN YOUR OPINION, IS IT A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING THAI THE EUROPEAN COHIUYITY SPONSORS AND GIVES FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO EUROPEAN SPORTING EVENTS?

1. GOOD THING

3. UEITHER GOOD NOP BAD [SPONTANEOUS) o. ?

2. BAD THIWG

Two out of three citizens favour the Community sponsoring European sporting events and giving financial support to

them (Table 1 9 1 , even if three out of five of those inter

- 69 -

Table/Tableau 19: ATTITUDES ON SPONSORIN6 MID FINAHCIAL SUPPORT FOR EUROPEM SPORTIH6 EVENTS (by country, percentages)/Attltu~es sur le parrafnage et l a partfelpatfon financidre tpar pays, pourcentages 1

1 I I

I

_--.

69

19

4 8

I O0

!.71

.---

.---

I

viewed did not reply to the question about which of such events - presented to them on a list - they had become aware of via the mass media. Since the events took place in different areas, the respective scores vary considerably by country (Table A 1 5 ) . Three out of ten think that such events contribute "much" to knowing about the European Community, another four of them believe they contribute Ira bit" (Table A 1 6 1 .

- 70 -

5.3 THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS AND THE THIRD UORLD

Y M T SHOULD BE IN YOUR OPINION OUR PRINCIPAL AI4 IN OUR RELATIONS YITH THE COUNTRIES OF THE THIRD YORLD?

1. RELIEVE THEIR POVERTY AND HISERY 2. HELP THEH TO BECOHE SELF SUFFICIENT 3. COOPERATE YITH THEH SO THAT THEY BECOHE REAL PARTNERS IN

THE YOPLD ECOYOHY 4. HONE OF THESE THIIGS o. ?

The "principal aim of aid to third world countries" should be "to help them to become self sufficient" say 61%. 17 X

prefer as aim "to relieve their poverty and misery"; 18% want "to prepare them to become real partners" (Table 2 0 ) .

SOHE PEOPLE FAVOUR, OTHER ARE AGAINST HELPING THE THIRD YORLD COUNTRIES. ARE YOU PERSONALLY.. . 1. VERY HUCH FOR 2. FOR TO SOHE EXTENT 3. SOHEWAT AGAINST 4 VERY HUCH AGAINST o. ?

As compared to the last special study on the subject of aid to development (within the framework of EUROBAROMETER no 2 0

survey in autumn 1 9 8 3 1 , general attitudes towards aid f o r the third world countries have not changed very much: almost nine out of ten persons interviewed are "to some extent" or "very much" in favour (Table A 1 7 ) .

OF THE FOLLOYINS THREE STATEHENIS YHICH ONE CONE CLOSEST TO WAT YOU THINK?

1.

2.

3 .

4. O.

NE BAVE TO HELP THE COUNTRIES OF THE THIRD YORLD s m y BECAUSE IHEY ARE POOR AIID N E D OUR XELP NE HAVE TO HELP THE COUNTRIES OF THE THIRD YORLD BECAUSE YE NEED THEH TO COFTINUE OUR OUI DEVELOPHENT liE SHOULD PAY LESS ATTENTIOW TO THE THIRD YORLD AND CONCENTRATE FIRST OR FIGHTING AGAIIST POVERTY IN OUR OY1 COUNTRIES NONE OF THESE THINGS ?

- 71 -

r-_____--__----_____--------.

PRINCIPAL AIM FOR AID/ but prfncfpol de l'ofde relieve their poverty and aisery/souloger leur ifsere help thea to become self- sufficient/les ofder d se sufffre d eux-ihes '

cooperat ionlcooperotf on ' none of theselrfen de tout celo d.k.-n.a.ln.s.p.-s.r. -_____--_---________--------.

TOTAL.

TablelTableau 20: ATTITUDES ON AID FOR THE THIRD YORLD (by country,percentagesl/Attftudes d 1'4pord de l'ofde oux pays du Tiers-Ronde (por poys,pourcentogesl

ATIITUDES ON AID FOR THE THIRD YORLDIATTITUDES SUR L'AIDE AU TIERS-ROIDE

IT YILL EVENTUALLY HAPPEN 1HAT:lovec le terps on por- v f endro. . . povertyLaisery vill be re- lievedld souloger lo ifsire

yeslouf nolnon d.k.-n.a./n.s.p.-s.r

become self-sufficient/d se sufffre d eux-idnes

yeslouf nolnon d. k. -n. a. /n. s. p . -s .r

become real partners/d Ptre de reels portenoires

yeslouf nohon

I I

~ d.k.-n.a.1n.s.p.-s.r

I

UHAT THE RICH COUNTRIES ARE CURPENTLY DOING. . . / que font octuellenent les poys rf ches, . . is relieving the poverty k aiserylsoulager lo ifsire

yeslouf nolnon d.k.-n.a./n.s.p.-s.r,

is teaching then to be self, sufficient/leur opprend d s( sufffre d eux-idnes

yeslouf nolnon d.k. -n.a./n.s.p.-s.r

is preparing them to become real partnerslles prepare d devenf r de reels partenof re!

yeslouf nolnon d. k. -n. a. /n. s. p . -s. r

- - B

---.

14

61

18

5 2

O0 ---.

- -

53 35 12

46 41 13

16 65 20 - -

46 36 18

49 33 18

19 55 26 - -

- - DKK

----

6

72

19

2 1

O0

_ _ _ _ - -

37 48 15

38 49 13

14 63 23 - -

34 48 17

31 48 21

22 53 25 _. -

- - D

----

17

68

13

2 1

Ol ----

- -

47 43 10

52 40 9

26 59 15 - -

52 38 Il

50 39 12

26 58 16 - -

- - 6R

----

43

28

19

4 6

O0 ---- - -

45 39 16

20 ~

54 26

1.5 56 28 - -

53 25 22

32 39 29

24 40 36 - -

- -

E

._--

15

t5

13

1 7

31 _---

- -

35 53 I2

15 65 20

10 66 23 - -

50 33 17

31 43 26

23 49 28 - -

- _I

F

----

lo

57

29

2 2

O0 ----

- -

51 40 9

33 55 12

16 71 13 - -

61 27 12

59 29 12

35 47 18 _. _.

- -

[PL

._-_

20

16

9

1 4

DO _ _ _ _ - -

59 30 I l

58 28 14

28 47 25 - -

61 22 17

58 23 19

35 34 31 - -

- - I

.---

13

59

16

1 1

DO

---- - -

50 Il IO

30 58 13

1 1 70 19 - -

65 21 14

56 25 18

24 51 25 - -

- -

L.

_ _ _ _

13

b8

15

1 3

DO -___

- I

45 46 9

35 55 10

32 57 11 - -

74 17 10

62 26 12

49 38 13 - -

- - SL

_---

8

58

27

1 7

D1 __-_

- -

60 28 12

53 34 13

17 63 20 - -

53 33 15

54 31 15

22 57 20 - -

- - P

_--_

47

30

I4

1 7

99 _--_

- -

68 19 14

21 53 26

15 54 31 - -

59 25 16

31 43 26

22 47 32 - -

- - UK

----

8

71

17

2 2

O0

_ _ _ _ - -

41 47 6

46 45 9

20 68 12 - -

48 42 10

49 39 13

30 56 14 - -

- I_

0

EC1 2

_ _ _ _ _

17

61

18

2 3

1 o1 ----.

- -

48 42 10

37 50 13

17 66 17 - I_

55 32 13

49 35 16

27 52 21 - -

- 7 2 -

Hore reluctance may be found among people who say we should "pay less attention . . . and concentrate on fighting poverty in our own country (countries)v1: one in four replies that way; scores being significantly above average in France, Belgium and in the United Kingdom (Table A 1 8 ) . Optimism with respect to the prospective success of Third World countries to improve their situation is hesitant (Cf. third section of Table 201.

5.4 THE YOUNG IN THE EUROPEAN COHHUNITY

IN YOUR OPINION, MAT ARE THE THREE IIAJOR PROBLEIIS FACIN6 YOU116 PEOPLE TODAY?

1. 2 . 3 . 4.

5. 6. 7. O .

LACK OF SUITABLE HOUSII6 RACISII AIID DISCRIllINATION LACK OF JOBS SCHOOL AND TRAININ6 DON' I PREPARE YOU116 PEOPLE PROPERLY FOR LIFE PROBLEIIS YITH THE AUTHORITIES ( POLICE, CIVIL SERVICE. . . 1 AIDS OTHER ?

LABELS USE0 IN TABLES MO FIGURES

11) LACK OF HOUSIK 121 OISCRIIIINATION, RACISII 131 LACK OF JOBS 141 SCHML MO TRAININ6 (5) AUTHORITIES (61 AIDS

10) mr T KNwn (7) o m

The mador problem8 facing young people today are "lack of jobs", "inadequate school and training" and "AIDS". Response patterns for the Community as a whole show little difference between the opinion of the young and the opinion of the total sample (Fig. 1 1 ) .

- 73 -

FIGURE 1 1

THE MAJOR PROBLEMS FACING YOUNG PEOPLE TODAY AS SEEN BY THE YOUNG AND THE PUBLIC AT LARGE

(EC1 2)

85% I LACK OF JOBS l a a x

SCHOOL dr TRAINING

AJOS

LACK OF HOUSING

DISCRIMIN~'N/RACISY

AUMORITIES

OTHER

DON'T KNOW

m UP TO 24 YURS ALL RESPONDENTS

There are, however, some variations across countries (Table 2 1 ) . For example: lack of adequat,e housing figures more prominently in Denmark, Spain, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom; AIDS takes third or forth place everywhere except for Luxembourg, where it scores second; the position of "racism and discrimination" as one "major problem facing young people today" varies considerably between countries and is seen as particularly disquieting in the Netherlands and rather disquieting in France and Belgium (Table 2 1 ) .

- 74 -

Tab1 e/Tabl eau 21 : MAJOR PROBLEM FACING YOUNG PEOPLE TODAY (rank order by country, percentages; t o t a l sample (15 years and ouer)VPr&lBws principaux auxquels les jeunes doivent faire face A l'hure actuelle (par pays d'aprbs le rang, pourcentages; échantillon total (âgé 15 et plus))

BELGIQUE

Lack o f jobs 87 School and t r a i n i n g 53 A I DS 38 Racism & Discr iminat ion 33 Authori ti es 19 Lack o f housi ng 17 Other 7 d.k./n.a. 2

ELLAS

Lack o f jobs a7 School and t r a i n i n g 50 AIDS 41 Lack o f housi ng 22 Racism & Discr iminat ion 9 Authori ti es 8 Other 2 d. k. /n. a. 5

IRELAND

Lack o f jobs 96 School and t r a i n i n g 65 AIDS 50 Lack o f housi ng 42 Author i t ies 26 Racism & DiScriBinat ion 13 Other 4 d. k. /n. a,

NEDERLAND

Lack. o f jobs 75 Racism & Discr iminat ion 43 School and t r a i n i n g 42 AIDS 29 Author i t ies 24 Lack o f housi ne 17 Other 9 d. k ./n. a. 3

DANHARK

Lack o f jobs 83 Lack o f housi ng 66 School and t r a i n i n g 35 AIDS 34 Racism & Discr iminat ion 21 Author i t ies 15 Other 12 d. k. I n , a. 1

ESPANA

Lack o f jobs 89 School and t r a i n i n g 47 Lack o f housing 30 AIDS 23 Author i t ies 15 Racism & Discr iminat ion 12 Other 6 d. k. /n. a. 3

ITALIA

Lack o f jobs 96 School and t r a i n i n g 56 Lack o f housing 37 AIDS 36 Racism & Discr iminat ion 18 Authori t i es 16 Other 1 d. k ./n. a.

PORTUGAL

Lack o f jobs 88 Lack o f housing 64 School and t ra in ing 47 AIDS 19 Racism & D i s c r i l i n a t i o n 10 Author i t ies 8 Other 10 d. k ./n. a. 2

DEUTSCHLAND .

Lack o f jobs 84 School and t r a i n i n g 57 A I DS 40 Lack o f housing 23 Authori ti es 18 Racism & Discr iminat ion 16 Other 7 d. k. /n. a. 3

FRANCE

Lack o f jobs 90 School and t r a i n i n g 58 AIDS 45 Racism & Discr iminat ion 34

Aut hor i t i es 16 Other 6 d. k ./n. a.

Lack'of housing 20

LUXENBURG

Lack o f jobs 80 AIDS 49 School and t r a i n i n g 40 Authori ti es 24 Racism & Discr iminat ion 20 Lack o f housi ng 17 Other 7 d. k. /n. a. 6

UNITED KINGDON

Lack o f jobs 83 School and t r a i n i n g 52 Lack o f housi ng 37 A I DS 34 Racism & Discr iminat ion 20 Author i t ies 19 Other 10 d. k. /n. a. 1

- 7 5 -

5.5 ATTITUDES TOUABDS THE ENERGY PBOBLEH

ALL NEU DEVELOPHENT IN THE INDUSTRIAL FIELD IHPLIES EFFORTS, TIHE AND HONEY , IT HAY ALSO INVOLVE RISK. HERE AEE 3 OPINIONS ABOUT THE DEVELOPHENT OF NUCLEAR POYER STA- TIOW, YHLCH USE ATONIC ENERGY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY. WHICH OF THESE 3 STATEHEHTS COHES CLOSEST TO YOUR OUN OPIBION ON THE DEVELOPHENT OF NUCLEAR POVER?

1 . IT IS YORTHVHILE 2. NO PARTICULAR INTEREST 3. o. ?

THE RISKS INVOLVED ARE UNACCEPTABLE

The number of people seeing "the risks involved in the development of nuclear power stations for the production of electricity" as being "unacceptable" represented a minority of 4 3 % (of those who replied to the question) in 1 9 8 4 .

The respective autumn 1 9 8 7 score is majoritarian (56%) but a 6% drop was registered as compared to one year earlier i.e. shortly after the Tchernobyl catastrophe. (The number of people seeing such development a5 "of no interest" remained as stable over this period ( 8 % to 9%) as the number of those who did not reply at all ( 1 1 % to 1 2 % ) 1 (Fig. 1 2 , Table A 2 0 ) .

F I G U E 1 2

ATTITUDES ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS * 0 worthwhile a of no interest risk unocceptoble

100 %

90

80 70 60

50

40 30

20

10 n

n "

1978 (EC9) 1982 (€CIO) 1984 (EC10) 1986 (EC12) 1987 (EC12)

percent of those who reply; don't know/no answer proportions vary. from aurvey to survey. between 11% ond 15X

- 76 - .

Assessing the evolution of attitudes over time, one must keep in mind that 1 9 8 4 figures are based on the Community of "The Ten", i.e. without Spain and Portugal. As Table A 1 9

shows, these countries are less inclined towards nuclear energy. (The same tendency had shown in 1 9 8 6 < 2 7 > ) . In other words, our evolutionary Figure 1 2 reveals two effects: (al the "Tchernobyl effect" and its relative decline and (b) the consequence of Spain and Portugal having become members of the European Community.

L

5.6 FOREIGN LANGUAGES SPOKEN

UHAT LANGUAGES HAVE YOU LEARNED?

AND MAT LANGUAGES CAN YOU SPEAK UELL ENOU68 TO TAKE PART IN A CONVERSATIOII?

WAT LANGUAGE DO YOU USE AT HOHE?

1 . DANISH 2. GERHAN 3. FRENCH 4. ITALIM 5. DUTCH 6. ENGLISH 7. SPAIISH 8. PORTUGUESE 9. GPEEI

10. OTHER 1 1 . ?

One out of three citizens- of the European Community speaks at least one foreign language "well enough to follow a conversation" (Table 2 2 ) . 51% of those interviewed had (at

27, See also: Europeans and the Probler of Nuclear Energy in 1986, Conission of the EC, 1987 (Beport available upon request a t the Service "Surveys, Research, Analysis").

- 77 -

least some) training (at school or elsewhere) 'in English, 42% in French, 33% in German. 36% speak English "well enough to follow a conversation", 27% do so in French, 25% in Ger- man < 2 8 > (Fig. 13; native speakers of the respective language are included in this chart).

\

fable/fableau 22: FOPEIGI LMGllA6ES SWIEI? (by country, percentagesVLangues PtrPngPfes parldes 3 (paf pays, pourcentages)

("good enough t o follou a c o n v e r s a t i o n R / 9 u f f f s t bien pour participer d une conversatfonml

-------- none/ aucune one/ une tuo/ deux rore/ plusf - eurs

total 2

In Luxembourg uLetzeburgischR is prilraryly used a t home/ En luxenburg on pafle chez sof le uletzebwgfscliu

28) The languages questions are part of the study on "Problems Facing Young People i n the EC". They uere put t o the to ta l salrple. Percent foreign languages "learned. and "spoken ue l l enough t o follou a conversation" are higher among people aged 15 t o 24 a s compared t o t h e i r elders i n practically every language: 752 have had training i n English, 532 i n French, 372 in Geman, 212 i n Spanish, 202 i n I ta l ian.

- 78 -

F I G U E 13

LANGUAGES LEARNED AND LANGUAGES SPOKEN (percentages, EC1 2)

ENGUSH

FRENCH

GERMAN

¡TAUAN 2 10%

SPANISH 1 4z

DUTCH w;g GREEK m 5 x

PORTUGESE Bix DANISH

OTHER wgz NO ANSWER B4x

5 LUVCUAGES LEARNEO UNGWCES SPOKEN

EUROBAROMETER NR. 28 EUROBAROMETRE N0.28

A P P E N D I X I A N N E X E S

- TECHNICAL DETAILS ON FIELDWORK AND SAMPLE SIZE / DETAILS TECHNIQUES: TERRAINS, ECHANTILLONS ETC p . Al

- ADDITIONAL TABLES FROM AUTUMN 1987 SURVEY / TABLEAUX SUPLEHENTAIRES DU SONDAGE AUTOMNE 1987 p . A5

- DETAILED TABLES ON EIGHTEEN TREND VARIABLES / TABLEAUX DEETAILLES POUR DIX-HUIT VARIABLES TREND p. B1

- LIST OF SURVEYS ON ATTITUDES OF THE EUROPEANS / LISTE DES RECHERCHES SUR LES ATTITUDES DES EUROPEENS p. B141

- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS POR SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-POLITICAL VARIABLES / SPECIFICATIONS TECHNIQUES POUR LES. VARIABLES SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIQUES ET, SOCIO-P.OLITIQUES p. B146

- A l -

I N S T I T U T S CHARGES DU SONDAGE ET SPECIALISTES RESPONSABLES

INSTITUTES WHICH CARRIED OUT THE SURVEY AND EXPERTS I N CHARGE

Tél . 322.21 9.30. T é l e x 046.64577 Te l e f ax 322.218.00.99

OUE/BELGIE

DANMARK

DEUTSCHLAND

ELLAS

ESPANA

FRANCE

IRELAND

I T A L I A

DIMARSO N.V. 78 B o u l e v a r d Lambermont 8-1030 - BRUXELLES

P a t r i c k JANSSENS B 1

GALLUP MARKEDSANALYSE A.S. Gammel V a r t o v v e j 6, DK-2900 HELLERUP, COPENHAGEN

Asger SCHULTZ R o l f RANORUP

Té l . 451.29.88.00 T é l e x 055.15180 T e l e f a x 451.18.24.66

EMNID-INSTITUT GmbH B o d e l s c h u i n g h s t r a s s e 23-25a D-4800 BIELEFELD 1

W a l t e r TACKE K l a u s- P e t e r SCHOEPPNER F r a n z KILZER

Anthony LYKIARDOPOULOS T i lemachos D IB

Té l . 49.521.260.010 T é l e x 041.932833 T e l e f a x 49.521.260.01.55

ICAP HELLAS S.A. 64 Queen S o p h i a Avenue GR-115 28 ATHENS

Té l . 301.722.56.51 T é l e x 0601.215736 T e l e f a x 301.722.02.55

. J o r g e J.MIQUEL CALATAYUD Jaime -MIQUEL ADRADA L u i s PAMBLANCO

Té l . 341.431.07.46 T é l e x 052.42221 T e l e f a x -

INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION GALLUP C a l l e Aya la , 6, 6O DCHA E-28001 MADRID

Té l . 331.45.54.97.11 T é l e x 205165 T e l e f a x . 331.45.54.74.47

'- . INSTITUT DE SONDAGES LAVIALLE 6-8 Rue du 4 Septembre F-92130 ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX

A l b e r t LAVIALLE F l o r e n c e FABRE

Té l . 353.176.11.96 T é l e x 0500.30617 T e l e f a x 353.1 76.08.77

IR ISH M A R K E T I N G SURVEYS L t d 19-20 Upper Pembroke S t r e e t IRL-DUBLIN 2

C h a r l e s COYLE Mary BOYCE

T é l . 392.782.217 T é l e x 043.43335161 Te 1 e f ax 392.78 1.530

ISTITUTO PER LE RICERCHE STATISTICHE E L 'ANALISI DELL'OPINIONE~PUBBLICA (DOXA) G a l l e r i a San C a r l o , 6 -(Corso Europa) 1-20122 MILANO

E n n i o SALAMON A l f o n s o d e l RE

LUXEMBOURG INSTITUT LUXEMBOURGEOIS OE RECHERCHES SOCIALES (ILRES) 6, r u e du Marché-aux-Herbes GD- 1728 LUXEMBOURG

L o u i s MEVIS Edmée MEVIS C h a r l e s MARGUE

161. 352.47.50.21. T é l e x 0402.60468 T e l e f a x -

REDERLAND NEDERLANDS INSTITUUT VOOR DE PUBLIEKE OPINIE (NIPO) B.V. Wes te rdokhu is , B a r e n t z p l e i n 7 NL-1013 AMSTERDAM

A r n o l d WEIJTLANDT M a r t i n JONKER

161. 31.20.24.88.44 T é l e x 044.14614 T e l e f a x 31.20.26.43.75

PORTUGAL NORMA - Sociedade de Es tudos p a r a o Desenvo lv imen to de Empresas, S.A.R.L. Rua Marqués de F r o n t e i r a , 76 P-1000 LISBOA

J.A. VIDAL de OLIVEIRA 161. 351.1.76.76.04 T é l e x 0404.12604 T e l e f a x - .

SOCIAL SURVEYS (GALLUP POLL) 202 F i n c h l e y Road, UK - LONDON NW3 6BL

UNITED KINGDOM Norman WEBB R o b e r t WYBROW

161. 441.794.04.61 T é l e x : 051.261712 T e l e f a x : 441.431.02.52

C o o r d i n a t i o n internationale/International c o o r d i n a t i o n : Hélene RIFFAULT - Jean- Franço is T C H E R N I A

FAITS E T OPINIONS 25, r u e Cambon, F-75001 PARIS

161. 331.42.96.41.65 - T é l e x 214789 - T e l e f a x 331.42.60.40.53

- A 2 -

Tou tes l e s données r e l a t i v e s aux Euro- Baromètres s o n t déposées aux Y l e l g i a n A r c h i v e s f o r t h e So- c i a l Sc iences" , (1, p l a c e Montequ ieu, 8-1348 Louva in- la- Neuve) . E l l e s s o n t t enues à l a d i s p o- s i t i o n des organ ismes membres du European Con- s o r t i u m f o r P o l i t i c a l Research (Essex) , du I n - t e r - U n i v e r s i t y Conso r t i um f o r P o l i t i c a l and So- c i a l Research ( M i c h i g a n ) e t des c h e r c h e u r s j u s - t i f i a n t d ' u n i n t é r ê t de reche rche .

Pour t o u s rense ignemen ts s u r l e s é tudes d ' o p i - n i o n p u b l i q u e f a i t e s 5 l ' i n i t i a t i v e de l a Com- m i s s i o n des Communautés européennes, é c r i r e à K a r l h e i n z REIF, IlSondages, reche rches , ana l yses , 200, r u e de l a L o i , 8-1049 B r u x e l l e s .

(*) Les douze i n s t i t u t s cha rgés de ces sondages s o n t r e p r é s e n t é s p a r l a s o c i é t é THE EURO- PEAN OMNIBUS SURVEYS S.C., d o n t l e c o m i t é de d i r e c t i o n comprend : Jan S t a p e l ( N I P O , Amsterdam), Norman Webb (GALLUP I N T E R N A T I O - NAL, Lond res ) , Hé lène R i f f a u l t e t Jean- F r a n ç o i s T c h e r n i a (FAITS & OPINIONS, P a r i s ) e t N i c o l e Jamar ( T H E EUROPEAN O M N I B U S SUR-

.VEYS, B r u x e l l e s ) .

A l l Euro- Barometer d a t a a r e s t o r e d a t t h e B e l- g i a n A r c h i v e s f o r t h e S o c i a l Sc iences (1, P l a c e Montesqu ieu, 8-1348 Louvain- La-Neuve). They a r e a t t h e d i s p o s a l o f a l l i n s t i t u t e s members o f t h e European Conso r t i um f o r P o l i t i c a l Research (Essex) , o f t h e I n t e r - U n i v e r s i t y Conso r t i um f o r P o l i t i c a l and S o c i a l Research ( M i c h i g a n ) and a l l t h o s e i n t e r e s t e d i n s o c i a l s c i e n c e r e- search.

F o r a l l i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g o p i n i o n s u r v e y s c a r r i e d o u t f o r t h e Commission o f t h e European Communit ies, p l e a s e w r i t e t o K a r l h e i n z REIF, " Surveys, Researches, Analyses!', 200 r u e de l a L o i , 8-1049 B r u s s e l s .

The t w e l v e i n s t i t u t e s w h i c h c a r r i e d o u t t h e s e s u r v e y s a r e r e p r e s e n t e d by THE EUROPEAN O M N I B U S S U R V E Y S S.C., o f wh i ch t h e b o a r d members a r e : Jan S t a p e l (NIPO, Amsterdam), Norman Webb (GAL- LUP INTERNATIONAL, London), Hé lène R i f f a u l t and Jean- Franço i s T c h e r n i a (FAITS E T OPINIONS, Pa- r i s ) and N i c o l e Jamar (THE EUROPEAN O M N I B U S SURVEYS, B r u s s e l s ) .

(**) Le sondage en N o r t h e r n I r e l a n d e s t f a i t en The N o r t h e r n I r e l a n d s u r v e y i s conduc ted j o i n t - c o l l a b o r a t i o n p a r I r i s h M a r k e t i n g Surveys l y by I r i s h M a r k e t i n g Surveys and S o c i a l Sur- e t S o c i a l Surveys ( G a l l u p P o l l ) . veys ( G a l l u p P o l l ) .

ECHANTILLONNAGE/SAUPLING

L ' o b j e c t i f de l a méthode d ' é c h a n t i l l o n n a g e e s t The sample bas been des igned t o be r e p r e s e n t a- de c o u v r i r de f a ç o n r e p r é s e n t a t i v e l a t o t a l i t é t i v e o f t h e t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n aged 15 y e a r s and de l a p o p u l a t i o n âgee de 15 ans e t p l u s , des o v e r o f t h e t w e l v e c o u n t r i e s o f t h e e n l a r g e d douze pays de l a Communauté k l a r g i e . L l é c h a n t i l - Community. I n each c o u n t r y a two s t a g e s a m p l i n g l onnage de chaque pays e s t c o n s t i t u é à deux n i - method i s used : veaux :

l o ) Rég ions e t l o c a l i t é s d ' enquê t f 1 0 ) G e o g r a p h i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n

L ' enquê te a l i e u s u r l ' e n s e m b l e du t e r r i t o i r e The su rvey c o v e r s t h e whole t e r r i t o r y o f t h e des douze pays, s o i t 138 r é g i o n s . ( V o i r l i s t e t w e l v e c o u n t r i e s i.e. 138 r e g i o n s . (See a t t a - c i - j o i n t e en A.4). ched l i s t A.4).

Chaque pays a c o n s t i t u é a l é a t o i r e m e n t un échan- I n each c o u n t r y a ramdom s e l e c t i o n o f s a m p l i n g t i l l o n - m a î t r e de l o c a l i t é s d ' enquê te , de t e l l e p o i n t s i s made i n such a way t h a t a l l t y p e s o f s o r t e que t o u t e s l e s c a t é g o r i e s d ' h a b i t a t s o i e n t a r e a (u rban , r u r a l , etc..) a r e r e p r e s e n t e d i n r e p r é s e n t é e s p r o p o r t i o n n e l l e m e n t à l e u r s popu la - t i o n s r e s p e c t i v e s .

p r o p o r t i o n t o t h e i r p o p u l a t i o n s .

Au t o t a l , l e s i n t e r v i e w s o n t l i e u dans e n v i r o n The i n t e r v i e w s a r e d i s t r i b u t e d i n more o r l e s s 1.350 p o i n t s d 'enquête . 1.350 s a m p l i n g p o i n t s .

- A 3 -

20) Choix des personnes in te r rogkes 20) Choice o f respondents

Les personnes i n t e r r o g é e s s o n t t o u j o u r s d i f f é - r e n t e s d 'une enquête à l ' a u t r e . L ' é c h a n t i l l o n - m a î t r e a l é a t o i r e évoqué c i- dessus i n d i q u e l e nombre de personnes B i n t e r r o g e r à chaque p o i n t d 'enquête . Au s t a d e s u i v a n t , l e s personnes à i n - t e r r o g e r s o n t dés ignées :

- s o i t p a r un t i r a g e au s o r t s u r l i s t e dans l e s pays o l on p e u t a v o i r accès à des l i s t e s ex- h a u s t i v e s d ' i n d i v i d u s ou de f o y e r s : Danemark,

F o r each su rvey d i f f e r e n t i n d i v i d u a l s a r e i n - t e r v i e w e d - i n t h e mas te r sample o f s a m p l i n g p o i n t d e s c r i b e d above. W i t h i n t h e s e samp l i ng p o i n t s t h e i n d i v i d u a l s t o be i n t e r v i e w e d a r e chosen :

- e i t h e r a t random f r o m t h e p o p u l a t i o n o r e l e c- t o r a l l i s t s i n t h o s e c o u n t r i e s where access t o s u i t a b l e l i s t s o f i n d i v i d u a l s o r house-

Luxembourg, Pays-Bas. ; h o l d s i s p o s s i b l e : Denmark, Luxembourg,

- o r by q u o t a sampl ing . I n t h e s e cases t h e quo- des s t a t i s t i q u e s de recensement, l ' é c h a n t i l - - t a s a r e e s t a b l i s h e d by sex, age and occupa- l o n é t a n t c o n s t r u i t à p a r t i r des c r i t è r e s de t i o n on t h e b a s i s o f census d a t a : t h i s sys- sexe, âge e t p r o f e s s i o n : Be lg ique , France, t e m i s used i n Be lg ium, France, . I t a l y , I t a l i e , Royaume-Uni, I r l a n d e ; United- Kingdom, I r e l a n d ;

- s o i t p a r une méthode combinant l e s deux p récé - - o r by a method comb in ing t h e two p r e c e d e n t den tes (cheminement s y s t é m a t i q u e ) : Al lemagne, ones (" random r o u t e ' ' ) : Germany, Greece,

N e t h e r l a n d s : - s o i t p a r é c h a n t i l l o n n a g e s t r a t i f i é s u r l a base

Grèce, Espagne, P o r t u g a l . Spa in , P o r t u g a l ,

P o p u l a t i o n ( I

M i l l i e r s /Thou- +

sands

% CE/EC

12

E c h a n t i 1 l o n s / Samples ( 2 )

(Euro- Baromètre no 28)

% C E / E C

10 Da tes

(Euro- Baromètre n o 28)

B DK D GR F IRL I L NL UK

7.924 4.133

51.466 7.715

42.851 2.455

44.438 300

11.400 45.207

3.64 1.90

23.62 3.54

, 19.67 1.13

20.39 .14

5.23 20.75

3.12 1.62

20.26 3.04

16.87 .97

17.49 .12

4.49 17.79

1 .O05 1 .O08

957 1 .o00

999 998

1 .O32 302 965

1.309

08 /10 au 16 /10 /1987 26 /10 au 20 /11 /1987 21 /10 au 19 /11 /1987 12 /10 au 10 /11 /1987 19 /10 au 19 /11 /1987 20/10 au 04 /11 /1987 23 /10 au 05 /11 /1987 15 /10 au 05 /11 /1987 26 /10 au 05 /11 /1987 10 /10 au 08 /11 /1987

C E / E C , I O 2 1 7.889 100.00 85.77 9.575 06/10 au 20/11/1987

E P

28.854 7.314

11.36 2.88

1 .o19 1.000

05 /10 au 23 /10 /1987 26 /10 au 24 /11 /1987

C E / E C 12 254.057 11.594 05 /10 au 24/11/1987 100.00

I1 e s t r a p p e l é que l e s r é s u l t a t s obtenus p a r Readers a r e reminded t h a t sample su rvey r e s u l t s a r e e s t i m a t i o n s , t h e degree o f c e r t a i n t y and p r e c i s i o n o f which, e v e r y t h i n g b e i n g k e p t e q u a l r e s t s upon t h e number o f cases. W i t h samples o f abou t 1.000, i t i s g e n e r a l l y a d m i t t e d t h a t a pe rcen tage d i f f e r e n c e o f l e s s t h a n f i v e p e r c e n t i s be low t h e a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l o f c o n f i - dence.

sondage s o n t des e s t i m a t i o n s don t l e degré de c e r t i t u d e e t de p r é c i s i o n dépend, t o u t e s choses é g a l e s d ' a i l l e u r s , du nombre des i n d i v i d u s cons- t i t u a n t l ' é c h a n t i l l o n . Avec des é c h a n t i l l o n s de l ' o r d r e de 1.000, on admet généra lement qu 'une d i f f é r e n c e i n f é r i e u r e i c i n q p o u r c e n t e n t r e deux pou rcen tages e s t au-dessous du n i v e a u ac- c e p t a b l e de c o n f i a n c e .

( 1 ) 15 ans e t p l u s . / 15 yea rs and over. ( 2 ) Nombre d ' i n t e r v i e w s . / Number o f i n t e r v i e w s .

-

BELGIOUE/BELGIE

Vlaams gewest Reg ion Wa l l onne B r u x e l l e s / B r u s s e l Antwerpen B r a b a n t H a i n a u t L i e g e L imburg Luxembourg Namur Oost- Vlaanderen West- Vlaanderen

BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND

S c h l e s w i g- H o l s t e i n Hamburg N i e r d e r s a c h s e n B raunschwe ig Hannover L i lneburg Weser-Ems Bremen Nord rhe im- Wes t fa len D U s s e l d o r f .

K ö l n Muns te r De tmo ld A rnsbe rg Hessen Darms tad t K a s s e l R h e i n l a n d- P f a l z Kob lenz T r i e r Rhe inhessen- Pfa l z Baden-WDrttemberg S t u t t g a r t K a r l s r u h e F r e i b u r g Tüb ingen Baye rn Oberbayern N i e d e r b a y e r n O b e r p f a l r Obe r f ranken M i t t e l f r a n k e n U n t e r f r a n k e n Schwaben

REGIONS D'ENQUETES / GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

S a a r l a n d ITAL IA UNITED KINGDOH B e r l i n (West)

Nord- ovest N o r t h P iemonte Y o r k s h i r e and Humbers ide

L i g u r i a E a s t A n g l i a DANMARK ( V a l l e d ' A o s t a ) E a s t U i d l a n d s

J y l l a n d Lombard ia South- East S j a e l l a n d Nord- Est Sou t h-W e s t

Fyn T r e n t i n o - A l t o Ad ige West H i d l a n d s Veneto North-West F r i u l i - V e n e z i a G i u l i a Wales

C e n t r o N o r t h e r n I r e l a n d

-

FRANCE E m i l ie-Romagne S c o t l a n d

I l e de F r a n c e Toscane B a s s i n p a r i s i e n Urnbr ia Champagne-Ardennes Marche P i c a r d i e L a z i o Haute-Normandie Campan i a K e n t r i k i E l l a s k a i C e n t r e A b r u z z ;-Hol i s e E v i a Basse-Normandie A b r u z z i Pe loponn i ssos Bourgogne M o l i s e I o n i o i N i s s o i Nord-Pas de C a l a i s Sud I p i r o s E s t P u g l i a T h e s s a l i a L o r r a i n e B a s i l i c a t a Makedonia A l sace C a l a b r i a T h r a k i Franche-Cornt6 S i c i l i a N i s s o i A i g a i o u Ouest Sardegna Krit i Pays de l a L o i r e B r e t a g n e Po i t ou- Charen tes Sud-Ouest A q u i t a i n e N o r e s t e M id i -Py rénées NEDERLAND Levan te L i m o u s i n Sur Cen t re- Es t Woord-Nederland C e n t r o Rhône-Alpes Gron ingen Noroes te Auvergne F r i e s l a n d N o r t e Ué d i t e r r an 6e D r e n t h e Languedoc- Rouss i l l on Oost- Neder land Provence- Alpes- Côte O v e r i j s s e l PORTUGAL

(Corse ) West- Nederland Grande L i s b o a

-

ELLAS -

LUXEUBOURG (GRAND-DUCHE ) ESPANA -

d'Azur G e l d e r l a n d

U t r e c h t Grande P o r t o Noord- Hol land L i t o r a l

Zee land I n t e r i o r S u l IRELAND Z u i d- H o l l a n d I n t e r i o r N o r t e

Donega l Zu id- Neder land N o r t h West Noord- Brabant N o r t h E a s t L I n b u r g West M id lands E a s t M i d West South E a s t South West

-

- A 5 -

Iable/lableau Al : HAPHONY AT HOHE :1986 AND 1987 (by country, percentagesVLa tranqufllftd d I'lntdrfeur du pays: 1986 et 1987 (par pays, pourcentages)

(*) A negative difference indicates a predominantly pessimistic outlook/Le dyne n4gatlf correspond d une ontfcfpatfon n4gatfve prMohante, et fnvershent.

- A 6 -

Table/Tableau AZ: HARllOWY ABROAD: 1986 AND 1987 (by country,percentages)/La tfanqfllfte d Irexterfeur du pays:f986 et 1987 (paf pays, pourcentages)

(*) A negative difference indicates a predolinantly pessimistic outlook./le sfgne n4gatff corfes- pond d une antfcfpatfon negative predorfnante, et fnvenirent.

- A 7 -

TabelITabl eau A3: "EURO-DYNAHOHETER" (per country, percentages)/"I'euro-dyna~tre" (par pays,pourcentages)

.......................... AT UHAT SPEED I S EUROPE ADVANCING AT PRESENT?/A QUEL LE UZ TESSE PROGRESSE ACTUEL 1 E W T 1 'EUROPE?

S1 owl y l l e n t e m t (codes 1 - 3)

A t medium pace/ noyennement (code 4)

Qui cklyiRapidemt (codes 5 -7)

d. k , -n. a. /n, s o p. -s, r .

Average score/scare Myen (*)

AT UHAT SPEED SHOULD EUROPE BE ADUANCING?/A QUELLE VITESSE L'EUROPE DEVRAI T-El 1 E PROGRESSER? Slowly/lentement

(code 1 - 3)

A t medium pace/ nayennement (code 4)

Qui ck ly IRapidmt (code 5 - 7)

d. k , -n. a. /n. s. p. -s. r .

DIFFERENCE BETUEEN AVERAGE SCORES/DIFFER€HCE ENTRE LES SCORES MYENS

(*) Calculated according to the percentages o f answers corresponding to each o f the seven points on the scale; "don't knows" excluded./Calculé selon les pourcentages de réponses correspondant i chacun des sept cades de l'echelle, nmrdponses exclues.

Tabel/Tableau A4: CHANGE IN PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR EUROPEAN UNIFICATION AND FOR THE EC, SPRIII6 1987 AND AUTlN 1987 (by country)/Changerent de !'oppuf global de l'opfnfon d l'fnt4gratfon furopPenne et d l a Conunoutt?, prfnteaps 1987 et autouie 1981 ( p r pays)

............................... OIIFICATION/UHIf ICATIOH - for very much/tds pour - for to some extent/ - against to some extent/ - against very much/ - d.k.-n.a/n.s.p.-s.r.

plutat pour

plutat contre

tds contre

UEIIBEBSHIP/APPAREHAUCf - a good thinglune bonne chose - neither good nor badlune chose ni bonne nf rauvafse

- a bad thinglune rouvafse chose

- d.k.-n.a./n.s.p.-s.r.

BENEFIT/ AVAUTAGE - benefit ted/Mnt?ff cf P - not benefitted/

pas b4nt?ffcfi - d.k.-n,a./n.s.p.-s.r.

----__------______-_----------.

----_---c---______-------------

PE6PEI DISSOLUTIOI/R€SRf T DE

B S A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 32 29 48 47

7 5

1 1

12 19 ------.

69 70 19 19

4 4

9 8 ------.

65 64 15 17

20 19 ------.

43 42 45 45 1 3 10 9

DK S A -------

12 14 27 34

20 22

27 21

14 9 -------

37 39 26 29

29 29

8 4 -------

54 53 29 29

17 18 .-------

28 30 21 29 27 27 19 14

- - D

S A -------

38 29 37 49

10 10

3 3

12 10 ------.

52 62 28 24

12 5

9 9 - - - - - - . 46 54 37 27

17 19 ------.

44 51 35 31 8 6 12 13 - -

- 6R

S A -------

35 37 29 32

14 9

6 5

16 17 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 58 27 21

14 12

1 1 10 -------

54 64 25 19

21 I7 I - - - - - - .

31 36 37 40 12 8 20 16

E S A _____-- 44 39 31 33

3 3

1 2

20 23 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 58 64 20 16

8 5

14 15 - - - - - - - 14 23 66 54

20 22 -------

40 43 38 32 6 4 16 21 - -

- - F

S A -------

40 35 46 50

5 4

2 1

8 1 1 -------

73 74 16 18

7 4

5 3 -------

60 59 19 22

22 20 - - - - - -

54 52 32 36 5 3 10 9

- - IRL

S A -------

26 22 36 39

8 10

4 3

26 26 ------.

55 64 22 21

13 9

10 6

65 79 19 12

16 9 I - - - - - -.

39 52 39 34 8 6 15 8 - -

- - I

S A - - - - - - - 47 41 38 45

4 4

1 1

10 9 -------

73 79 18 15

3 3

6 3 -------

64 72 17 14

19 15 -------

47 52 39 36 2 2 12 10

- - L

S A -------

40 43 37 38

10 6

4 2

9 10 - - - - - - . 76 87 19 9

2 1

4 3 ------.

67 84 17 6

16 10 ------.

58 70 34 22 1 1 7 7 -

- - NI

S A -------

36 32 45 46

8 8

4 3

8 11 -------

82 83 1 1 10

3. 3

3 4

69 74 15 13

16 14 I------.

52 53 33 33 4 2

1 1 13 - -

P S A -------

45 51 22 22

4 3

2 1

27 23 -------

69 68 14 21

3 4

15 7 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 55 73 22 13

23 15 -------

38 42 38 46 2 3 21 10 - -

- - UK

S A ------.

29 24 42 45

10 11

6 7

13 13 ------.

43 46 25 25

26 24

6 6 ------.

39 49 46 42

14 10 ------.

28 26 42 48 24 22 6 4

- - EC 12

S A -------

38 33 39 44

7 7

3 3

13 13 -------

60 65 21 20

11 8

8 7 -------

49 56 33 28

18 17 .-------

43 45 37 37 9 7 12 1 1 - -

I

9

03 I

- A 9 -

Table/Tableau . A5: ANAPENESS AND IllPPESSION OF THE EUROPEAN COIIISSION (by coantry,percentagesl/la notorfiti de la Coufssfon Europdenne et.1 'frpressfon qu'on a eu sur elle lpar pays,pourcentagesl

......................... HEARD OE BEAD ABOUT CEC/ A YU ou LU w. SUR LA CEL yeslouf nolnon d.k. -n.a./n.s.p.-s.r.

TOTAL --------_-__-_-__________ THOSE HAVING SEEN OR HEARD SOHETHIHG HAD A IIIPEESSION.. ./CEUX AYANT

IIIPRESSION.. . .. gen'erally favourable/ plutdt'bqnne generally unfavourable/ plutdt wuvofs'e , neither favourablenor unfavourable/nf bonne ni rauvaf se d. k.

vu w LU QC. A v m r , u n E

- A l o -

Table/Tableaa A6: AWARENESS AND IHPRESSION OF THE COHHISSION BY SEX, AGE, EDUCATION, AND OPINION LEADERSHIP (percentages, EC12)/fa notorfPtP et Jffrpressfon que Jfon a de Ia Coufssion selon Je sexe, I'Jge, I'dge ffn d'&des et "opfnfon leadershlp" Ipourcentages, CE121

HAS RECENTLY HEARD OR READ ABOUT THE COHHISSION/A LU W ENTENOU WELQUE CHOSE AU SUJET DE LA CONMSIOH yeslouf nolnon d.k.1n.a. - n.s.p./s.r ................................

GENERAL IHPRESSION OF THOSE UHO HAVE RECENTLY READ OR HEARD ABOUT THE COHHISSION/ IdPRESSIOiY GENERALE OE CEUX QUI ONT VU OU LU QUELQUE CHOSE f avourabl e/bonne neither favourable nor unfavourable/nf bonne nf Rauvafse unf avourabl elrauvaf se d.k./n.a. - n.s.p./s.r.

sex

50 37 44 56 5 7

42 40

23 29

31 24 5 7

.- age

5-24 25+ --------.

37 45 57 48 6 6 ---------

49 39

27 25

18 30 6 6

educat ion(*)

-15 16-19 20t -------_-----.

36 44 60 57 50 36 8 6 4 -------_------

44 42 35

24 26 28

26 26 32 6 6 5

66 50 41 27 32 45 52 65 3 5 7 9

42 41 40 42

20 ia 20 27

35 28 25 24 4 5 6 7

( * I age of leaving full time educationldge fin d'&tes P l See technical specifications at the end of appendix B/Vofr splcfffcatfons technfques

d Ia fin de l'annexe 8

- A 11 -

72 7 9 71 79 14 10 11 12

9 6 11 3 5 5 7 6

Tab1 e/Tabl eau A7: FEELINGS ABOUT THE USA 1984, 1985, 1987 I N 8 EC MEHEER STATES (by country, percentagesl/Opinion des Etats-Unis 1984, 1985, 1987 dans 8 Etats-#&m de la CE (par pays, pourcentages)

60 63 62 70 23 18 20 21

15 15 15 5 2 4 3 4

FEEELINGS ABOUT THE US OF AHERICA/OPIHlOH SUR LES '

ETATS-UHIS (ueryl goodi(tr8s) bonne neither good nor b a d i n i bonne n i rauvaise (*I [ueryl badi(trbs1 mauvaise d , k . -n. a . in. s. p. -s. r.

.-------------------____________L TOTAL

s = Spri ngiprintemps A = Auturniautme

FEEELÍNGS ABOUT THE US OF AIIERICEVOPlHlOH SUR E S ETATS-UNI s

(ueryl good/(trbs) bonne neither good nor bad/ n i bonne n i mauvaise (*I (very) badI(tr8sJ mauvaise d. k . -n, a . /n. s. p. -s. r .

............................... TOTAL

-

B

42 49 35 38 35 25 37 36

15' 20 22 19 8 '6, 6 7

0

51 54 50 59 38 31 32 32

9 12 13 7 2 3 5 2

100 100 100 100

\

4 A87 587 A85 A84 A87 587 A85 A84

GR

34 37 25 18 27 21 21 39

29 33 44 32 10 9 10 11

100 100 100 100

NC, - y--

A87 587 A85 A84

54 48 53 67 13 17 12 22

27 29 30 6 6 6 5 5

100 100 100 100

F

A87 587 A85 A84

49 62 50 42 23 16 24 42

24 17 20 9 4 5 6 7

100 100 100 100

. UK

A87 587 A85 A84

63 64 61 75 10 11 11 16

26 23 24 7 1 2 4 2

100 100 100 100

Table /Tableau AE: US 6wERIHENT POLICY TONARDS PESTERN EUROPEAN UNIFICATION 1984, 1985, 1987 AS SEEN IN 8 EC IIEIIBEP STATES (by country, percentagesl/La polftfque des Etats-Unfs d 1'pSard de J'unfffcatfon europienne 1984, 1985, 1987 cone percue dans 8 Etats-Herbres de Ja CE (par pays, pourcentages)

supporting and actively vorking for it/fovofabJe et agf t octfverent pour celo supporting but not actively vorking for Whvorable mis n'agft pas octfvewnt pour celo opposing but not actively vorking against it/ opposk rafs Pagft pas actfvewnt contre opposing and actively uork- ing against it/ opposk et agf t actfvewnt contre

d.k.-n.a.ln.s.p.-s.r. .- - - - _- - - - - _- - __- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTAL

l o

17

20

18

35

7 6

9 11

21 22

24 29

39 32

I

A87 A85 A84 -------------

14 14 22

35 33 32

20 20 18

10 11 11

21 22 17

100 100 100 -------------

UK

A87 A85 A84 --------------

21 19 23

40 40 36

13 10 13

5 5 6

21 26 22

100 100 100 -------------.

I

3 'r ru I

- A 1 3 -

age education(*)

15-24 25+ -15 16-19 20+ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ---------------

62 68 63 66 78

81 80 75 80 87

84 78 76' 80 87

81 80 77 82 87

73 68 64 73 73

80 80 74 83 88

79 78 74 81 84

74 68 66 70 75

73 69 65 72 78

53 54 51 54 60 I

Table/Tableau A9:

(percentages "advantage", EClZ)/Avantaqe du Srand llarchd luropden selon le sexe, l'dqe, l'&e fin d'dtudes et 'opfnfon leadershfp tpourcentages uavantagPl CE121

ADVAIITAGES OF TUE SINGLE COlIllON EUROPEU MPKET BY SEX, AGE, EDUCATIOS, AllD OPINIOS LEADERSHIP

opinion leadership(**)

++ + - -- ....................

73 69 67 60

83 82 82 70

83 80 82 74

83 83 83 73

13 71 71 61

85 83 82 70

82 81 80 72

72 71 72 62

74 73 71 62

61 55 55 47

BORDER CONTROL

RESIDESCE

YORK

BUY PRODUCTS

V.A.T. CLOSER

HAKE PAYHENTS

CARRY MONEY

BUY PROPERTY

BARK ACCOUNT

PUBLIC YORES

!

It

a

sex

70 63

81 78

80 79

82 79

70 68

83 77

80 78

71 68

1 73 67

I 57 51

L

:ion/&ge f it the end

Table/Tableau Alo: THE SINGLE COHHON EUROPEAN HARKET BY THE SOCIO-POLITICAL PROFIL OF THOSE UHO ARE IN FAVOUR (percentages, ECl2)/Le Grand krch& EuropPPn selon le profile socio-politique de ceux qui sont "pour" (pourcentages, CE121

r=== SINGLE COHHON EUROPEAN HARKET IS /GRAND iARCtlE EUROPEEN ES1

a good thinglune bonne chse

COING EVEN FURTHER? f ALLER PLUS LOIN? yeslouf .................................

In WHICH DIRECTION HAINLY?/

PAuivEnr? DANS WEL DIRECTION PRINCI-

POLITICAL uixon COMOH DEFENSE

comon CURRENCY

COOPERATION SCI AND TECH

incore (**I

42 39 44 44

37 35 39 38

48 51 53 47

60 59 66 69

lf) age of leaving full tiie education/dge fin d'&des (**I quartiles in each country/quartiles dans chaque pays (***I See technical specifications at the end of appendix B/Voir spPcificcltions techniques

d l a fin de 1 'annexe B

53 45 41 34

36 36 36 4Q

53 49 49 46

71 70 62 53

Table/Tableau A1 1 : A RESPOBSIBLE EUROPEAN GOVERIIIIENT? The Socio-Political Profile of Those in Faveur (EC12, percentagesI/LE GRANO NARCHE EUROPEEN RESPONSABLE? Le profil socio- politique de ceux qÙ1 sont npouP (CEIZ, pourcentages)

45 40 -----------

A RESPONSIBLE EUROPEAN GOVERN-

RESPONSABL E? f orlpour

n E m u n souvE,wn[nr EUROPEEN

................................ AIIONG THE FOLLOWING:/ P M N I LES OOIIAINES SUIVANTES:

50 ---

SECOR ITY /DEFEUSE

ENVI RONIIEIIT

CURRENCY

COOPERATION THIRD WORLD

EXTERNAL RELATIONS

SCIEICE AUD TECHNOLOGY

income (**I

43 49 51 55

62 59 61 59

59 59 57 66

42 43 43 45

44 30 42 40

41 43 42 49

54 56 61 60

( * I age of leaving full time educationldge f in d'&des (**I quartiles in each country/quartiles dans chaque pays (***I See technical specifications at the end of appendix B / V o i r spkifications techniques

d la fin de l'annexe B

opinion (***I leadership

tt t - --

50 53 50 37

59 59 61 59

66 66 57 54

50 44 42 30

46 47 40 35

40 40 44 35

67 64 59 49

value (***I or ien tat ion

mat mix post --------------

47 50 53 --------------

61 63 45

56 60 73

41 43 45

37 41 55

30 44 59

54 60 73

self- (***I placement L C R --------------

56 49 45 --------------

55 60 69

67 50 50

46 41 44

46 39 42

46 43 46

64 59 57

table/Tableau A12: AUARENESS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIMEUT (1977-1987) [EC and by country, percentagesVla notoff&? du Parlerent Europden (1977-1987) (CE et par pays,pourcentagesl

- UK

.--- 58 44 55

55

50 31 48 72

58 54 41 '

38 34 37 41

.---

.---

I _ _ _

- -

- - CE :*>

49 50 65

66

54 37 48 75

67 61 53 49 43 45 44

.___

.---

.---

_ _ _

- - (*)until 1979 EC 9, until autumn 1985 EC 10, thereafter: EC 12//usqurd 1979 CE 9, /USqU'd

autorne 1985 CE 10, aprds: CE 12

Table/Tableau A13 : SHOULD THE EUROPEAN PARLIAHENT TO BE ELECTED IN 1989 DRAFT A CONSTITUTION FOR A EUROPEAN UNION?/ (by European parliamentary Party Preference, percentagesl/le Parlerent Europden de 1989 dwraf t preparer le profet de l'unfon europdennet (selon preference partisane europienne, pourcentages)

agree / disagree / d.k.-n.a./ d'accord pas draccord n.s.p.-s.r,

<*) See technical specifications at the end of Appendix B of full report. / Yofr spdcfflcatfons technfgues d la ffn de l'annexe B du rapport Intdgral.

- A 17 - !

E

_---

36 60

.--- 101

Table/Tableau A14: THE EUROPEAN PPO6RIVIIIE FOR FI6EIIW6 CMCER (by country ,percentages)/le programe europ4en de lutte contre l e cancer (par poys,pourcentages)

F IRL I

---- -___

50 22 59 49 73 39

5 1 5 2

100 100 100 ---- ----

READ OR HEARD MmHIW6 ABOUT IT? / l u ou entendu qc. d ce sufet?

yes/ouf 46 noinon 49 d.k. -n.a./n.s.p.-s.r. 6

TOTAL 1 O l .................................. ----

r

F

---

9 '

16

30

25

16

56

158 ---

IRL I

--- --- 8 5 8

13 11

12 9

16 10

5 9 3

34 16

13 15 3 2 .

50 63

154 135 --- ---

TableITableau A15:

YL

---

14

9 7

14

7 4

19

?9 1 1

i3

151 ---

HAUE YOU HEARD ABOUT INTERNATIONAL SPORTING EVENTS SPONSORED BY THE EC (by country, percentanes)/Ave2-vws entendu parler de mifestations sportives internationales sponsorisdes par la CE (par pays, pocirccentages)

- P

---

5 6

10

8

23

10

70

139 ---

-

D GR

--- ---

6 10

12 5

Il 3

9 4

6 3

13 7

9 5 2 .

17 80

135 117 --- ---

-

- - L

---

5

13

62

26

6

20

19 8

32

I71 _--

- -

- - UK

--- 9

18

14

17

14

20

13 6

47

I 58 ---

- -

L L

x1:

.-e-

7

12

11

14

7

18

14 3

58

44 .---

- -

- A 1 8 -

Table/Tableau Al 6: DO SPORTING EVENTS HELP TO MAKE THE EC BETTER ENOYN? (by country, percentagesVles rani festatfons sportfves afdent-elles d deux connartre la CE? (por pays,pourcentages)

Table/Tableau Al 7: FOR OR AGAINST AID TO THIRD UOBLD COUNTRIES 1983 AND 1987 (by country,percentages)/Pouf ou contre l'afde aux m y s du Tfers-Honde 1983 et 1987 (par pays,pourcentages)

1 FOR TO SORE EXTENTI plutdt pour

SOHEUHAT AGAINST/ plutdt contre

VERY RUCH AGAINST/ tRs contre

d.k. -n.a./n.s.p.-s.r.

(*) (very much formis pour : 4,very Buch againstltris contre : 1) (**) uithout E,P

Table/Tableau A18: REASONS FOR AIDING THIRD YORLD COUNTRIES (by country,percentages)/ßotffs d'aider les pays du Tfers-bonde (par pays,pourcentages)

.-___-_-------------____________________-- THEY ARE POOR AND NEED HELP/fls sont pauvres et fls ont besofn de notre afde

NEED THEM TO CONTINUE OUR OWN DEVELOPXENT/pour contf nuer d nous devel opper nous-daes

s'occuper d'abord de lutter contre la pauvret4 chez nous

NONE OF THESE THINGS/rfen de tout cela d.k. -n.a.h.S.p.-s.r.

LESS ATTENTION AND CONCENTRATE FIRST AGAINST POVERTY IN Oyll COUNTRIES/

I - _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTAL

- - I

.--.

56

17

21 4 2

I O0 .---

- -

TableITableau A19: OPINION ABOUT THE DEUELOPHENT OF NUCLEAR POUER STATIONS (by country, percentageWL 'opinion sur le diveloppement des centrales nucléaires (par pays,pourcentages)

E

22

9

46 24

1 o1

1.61

.---.

.---.

----

45

4

41 9

Tab1 e/Tabl eau A20: ATTITUDES ABOUT NUCLEAR PONER STATIONS 1978-1987 (Corunity as P whole, percentagesVAttitudes à I'cigard des centrales nucltiaires 1978-1987 (Ilensedle de la Cornunauté, pwrcentages)

I I

I_---------------------------

It is worthwhile/ Cela vaut le caup No parti cul ar i nterestl C'est sans intérlt The risks involved are unacceptabl eiCela présente des dangers inacceptables

d . k . -n. a . /n. s. p. -s. r,

1982 (EC101

-------.

38

10

37

15

E U R O B A R O M E T E R N R . 2 8 E U R O B A R O M E T R E N 0 . 2 8

A P P E N D I X 0 A N N E X E S

PART TWO / DEUXIEHE PARTIE

- DETAILED TABLES OW EIGHTEEN TREND VARIABLES /. TABLEAUX DEETAILLES POUR DIX-HUIT VARIABLES TREND p. B1

- LIST OF SURVEYS ON ATTITUDES OF THE EUROPEANS / LISTE DES RECHERCHES SUR LES ATTITUDES DES EUROPEENS p. B141

- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOCIO-DEHOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-POLITICAL VARIABLES / SPECIFICATIONS TECHNIQUES POUR LES VARIABLES SOCIO-DEHOGRAPHIQUES ET SOCIO-POLITIQUES p. B146

- B l -

1976 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978

TABLEAU B 1 / TABLE B l

LE SENTIMENT GLOBAL DE SATISFACTION DE LA V I E / THE FEELING OF OVERALL L I F E SATISFACTION

Dans l ' e n s e m b l e , ê t e s - v o u s t r è s s a t i s f a i t , p l u t ô t s a t j s f a i t , p l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t ou p a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t de l a v i e que v o u s menez ? / On t h e w h o l e , a r e y o u v e r y s a t i s f i e d , f a i r l y s a t i s f i e d , n o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d ,

. o r n o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d w i t h t h e l i f e y o u l e a d ?

1979

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

1973 1975 1975

% % % % % % %

36 I 40

52 I 51 I

I

I 8 1 7

3 1 2

%

37

51

9

2

% %

46 I I

43 I I

8 1 I

2 1

100 100 100 100 100 ' 100 100

963 1077 988 1006 1013 1008 983

42 I I

47 I I

7 1 I

2 1

100 100

1266 1507

100

1000


T o t a l

N

1 x 1 % % % % % % % % %

I [ T r è s s a t i s f a i t / ( V e r y s a t i s f i e d / P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / l N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d I P a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / ( N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d l S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I 100

I 1009

i N

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

949 1210 1020 1038 995 1018 1035 1016 1011

- 1986 I I - I V

%

2 2

57

1 5

5 1

1 O0

1007

-

- - - 999

1986 x - X I

%

1 3

61

19

5 2

I

I 1010 1005

BELGIQUE / BELGIE

1987 I 1987 I V 1 x - X I 7 %

30 i 23

54 I 56

10 I 16

I

I

I 4 1 4 2 1 1 II-,

I %If I

I l

%

- 8 2 -

%

TABLEAU B I ( s u i t e ) / TABL E 81 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% %

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % %

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0

1973 I 1975 I 1975

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100

1199 I 1073 I 1023

1986

DANMARK I

1986 1987 1987

1976 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1978 I 1978 I 1979 I

100 100 1 O0 1 O0

I I ' I I I

I I I I I 5 1 6 1 3 1 5 1 5 1 3

1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 1 1 1

I 4 1

I 1 1

977 I 962 I 1010 I 992 I 983 I 1002 I 1073 I

1980 IV %

55

40

4

1

-

1 O0

994 -

1981 I 1982 I V I I I I - I V

59 1 57 I

I 3 1 5

I 1 1 1 1 1

-%)r

36 I 37

7

DANMARK

1982 I 1983 x 1 I I I - I V

57 I 54

-T-p-

I

I

I

39 I 41

3 1 4

. I 1 * 1983 I 1984

x I I I I - I V -7i-p-

55 I 56

40 I 37 I

I

I 4 1 4

. I 1 * x - X I 1 I I I - I V

I

I

I

%)f 58 I 63

37 I 32

3 1 3

. I 1 2 1 1

LiJTI7

1985 x - X I

x 55

40

4

1

100

995

63

32

3

1

52 I 61

42 I 35 I

I

I 4 1 3

1 1 0

48 I I

46 I I

4 1 I

1 1

i ni i3 I 997 I 992 I 1002 I I I I I I I

- 8 3 -

1973 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977 1977

TABLEAU Bl ( s u i t e ) / TABLE Bl ( c o n t i n u e d )

1978 1978 1979

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % % % %

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d 1P 1 u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans rdponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

% % %

i N

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1957 1039 1002 1004 1007 1005 999

100 100 100

996 1006 1003

1980 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985

% % % % % % % % % %

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1009 1004 1328 1012 1049 1058 992

100 100 100

1053 1007 1028

I % T r è s s a t i s f a i t / % % % % % %

T o t a l I 100

N I 987

100 100 100

1084 994 957

- 6 4 -

%

T A B L E A U B I ( s u i t e ) / T A B L E B I (con t inued)

% % % % % % % % % Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not very s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans rkponse/No rep ly

Total

N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1000 1199 1000

E L L A S I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

1981 I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 1 1983 1 1984 I 1984 1 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I IV I III- IV I x I III- IV I x I III- IV I x- XI I III- IV I x- XI I I I I - I V I

1 x 1 % %

19 1 18 I 17 I 17 I 18 I 19 I 15 I 19 1 13 I 22 I l I I I I I I l I I

1 O0 1 O0

(Très s a t i s f a i t / (Very s a t i s f i e d II P 1 utô t s a t i s f a i t / 1) Fai r 1 y s a t i s f i ed i lplutôt pas s a t i s f a i t / ] N o t very s a t i s f i e d [Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / lNot a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ]Sans rkponse/No rep ly

(Tota l

1973 1975

I 1986 1 1987 I 1987

1975 1976 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979

% % % % % % % % % %

I N I 1000 1 Id00 I 1000

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not very s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans rkponse/No rep ly

Total

N

E L L A S

7 I

I I I I I I I t 7

I 7i-p-

I

I I I I I l I

i- I

I I %

I I

l I I I I l l I l I I I I l

% %

ii- I

15 i 16 i 15 1 14 i 10 i 11 i 13 i 12 i 1'1 i 10 i 62 I 59 I 59 1 59 I 59 I 57 I 60 I 59 I 59 I 58 I

I I I l I I I l I I

I I 2 1 2 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1

100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 2227 I 1156 1 1276 I 1241 I 1356 I 1256 I 1149 I 1276 I 1194 I 1152 I

- 8 5 -

FRANCE

1980 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985

TABLEAU B1 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l ( c o n t i n u e d )

-

' T r è s s a t i s f a i t / h e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d

' P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / Mot v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% % % % % % % % f %

I IRELAND I

100

1 1973 1 1975 I 1975 I 1976 1 1976 I 1977 1 1977 I 1978 I 1978 .I 1979 1

100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 100 100

993 1004 1199 939 1011 1000 1008 1006 1017 1006

\

-

% % % % %

T o t a l I 100 I 1004 N

100 100 100

994 1002 998

% T r è s s a t i s f a i t / P l % % % % % % % %

T o t a l I 100

N I 1199

100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 100 100 100

1000 998 1007 981 1008 997 1005 1005 997

TABLEAU BI ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 81 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1980

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / No t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

i

1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985

l T r & s s a t i s f a i t / / V e r y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / ( N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d l P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d )Sans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

%

( T r e s s a t i s f a i t / \ V e r y s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / ( F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / ( N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d l P a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d [Sans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

% % % % % % % % %

I N

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100

1008 1005 1181 1007 987 1002

100 100 100 100

1000 1008 1009 1008

._ .T I REL AND

% % % % x % % % % %

100 I 100 I 100

1002 1007 1005

I I

I I 1 1 1 12 I

I I 6 1 6 1

49 I 58 I

100 I I I I I I I. 997

I i I I

I I 7 1 9 1

52 I 53 I

12 I 16 I

1973 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977

1 1 I I 1 1 I l I I I I l I

1977 1978 1978 1979

% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1909

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100 100

1043 1110 923 1052 1025 1155 1175 1030 1178

- 8 7 -

I % / % % % T rès s a t i s f a i t /

TABLEAU 81 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 81 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % %

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 100

N I 1116 1183 1301 1025

( T r è s s a t i s f a i t / [ V e r y s a t i s f i e d / P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / [ F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d I P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ISans rCponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

100 100 1 O0 100 100 100

1031 1033 I 1060 1097 1127 1047

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans rCponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0

330

_I_

1986 [ I I - I V

% -

11

61

2 1

7

- 1 O0

1103 - -

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

311 297 268 301 302 344 322 291 299

x - X I I I V

I

I

I

%(x 12 I 14

57 I 57

22 I 22

8 1 7 1 1 0

-7iJ-TI

1987 x - X I

%

11

54

24

11

1 O0

1031

I T A L I A

7 T-pr I

I I I I l l l

i-

% I I I

I I I % % %

i i I I l l l I I I I I I I l i i I

-iii- 7

- B 8 -

1 % % . % % %

TABLEAU 8 1 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B 1 (con t inued)

I I I

% % % lTrès s a t i s f a i t /

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / No t very s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse/No rep ly

Total

N

I Total I 100 1 O0 100 100 100 100

I 300 300 399 300 300 304

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not very s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse/No reply

Total

N

1 O0 1 O0

300 299

I I I- IV I x-XI 1

I I I I

7 1 5 1 l I

1 1 2 1 I 1 1

-7-p-I 39 I 41 I

53 I 51 I

Ta7i-T

1986 1986 1987 1987

% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0 1 O0

29 9 301

1 O0 1 O0

287 302

1973 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979

% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1464 1093 1006 904 1123 1033 943 1131 913

100

974

- 8 9 -

1980

TABLEAU B l ( s u i t e ) / TABLE E1 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 I I T r S s s a t i s f a i t / I V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / ] F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d l p l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / l N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d ( P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / I N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ( S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1 T o t a l

I N

% %

[ T r e s s a t i s f a i t / / V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d J P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / I N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d l P a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ISans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

( T o t a l

% % % % % % % %

100 100

47

48

4

1

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

44 I 42 1 46

48 I 52 1 44 I I

I I

I I 6 1 4 1 7

2 1 1 1 2

1986

39 I 38 1 44 l I

I I I I

53 I 51 I 48

6 1 7 1 6

2 1 3 1 1

1986 1987 1987

47 I 40

45 I 50 I

I I

5 1 6

1 1 2

% % % %

35 I I

56 I I

7 1 I

2 1

% % % % % %

100

1001

999 1 1091 I 1228 I 1056 1 998 1 1050 I 1015 I 1018 I 985 I 1068 I

100 100 100

1026 1004 96 5

I 100

I 1933

I ( T r e s s a t i s f a i t / I V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / ( F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d ] P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / [ N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d l P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / ] N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d l S a n s r b p o n s e / N o r e p l y

( T o t a l

I N

100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1328 1438 1340 1351 1414 1351 1426 1339 1317

I G R E A T BRITAIN (1973) and UNITED KINGDOM I 1 1973 1 1975 1 1975 I 1976 I 1976 1 1977 I 1977 1 1978 I 1978 1 1979 I I I X I v - V I I x - X I I v - V I I X I I I V - v 1 x - X I I v - V I I x - X I I I V 1

% % % % % % % % %

l I l l I l l I l I I 1 52 1 5 3 I 53 I 54 I 56 I 53 1 57 I 52 I 55 1 59 1 I I 11 I 1 3

l I 9 I 1 2 I 12

l I 3 1 5 1 5

I l I l I I 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 ) 8 1 1 1 1

I l I 1 I I 4 1 5 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1

- 8 1 0 -

TABLEAU B l ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B 1 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1980 1981 1982

I T r k s s a t i s f a i t / ( V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / / N o t v e r y s a t i s - f i e d l p a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d [ S a n s r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l '

I N

1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985

% % % % % % % % % %

100

1454


T o t a l

N

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1369 1419 1335 1348 1277 1355 1405 1443 1383

1 % 1 % % [ T r è s s a t i s f a i t / % % % % % % %

I T o t a l 1 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

I 1378 1318 1306 1308

1973 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979

% % % % % % % % f %

loö

13484

100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

9550 9150 8627 9210 9044 8936 9327 8788 8976

- B 11 -

%

T A B L E A U B1 ( s u i t e ) / T A B L E B1 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % [Tres s a t i s f a i t / (Very s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / [ N o t very s a t i s f i e d [Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ISans rkponse/No reply

%

I Total

I N

% %

C O M M U N A U T E / COMMUNITY ( E U R 1 0 )

%

1 9 8 0 I 1 9 8 1 1 1982 1 1982

% P l %

1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0

8 8 8 2 I 9898 I 1 1 6 7 6 I 9689

1 O0

1983 I 1983 I 1984

100 100

9790

20 I 18 I

I 5 9 I 58

9725 9746

21

56

l % l % % Très s a t i s f a i t / % % % % % % %

I k t

T o t a l I 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0

N I 9 8 2 2 9827 9 6 5 2

1 O0

9566 - i

19 1 23 I 18 I

6 0 I 56 I 57 I I I I

% % % %

9909 1 9936 I 9846 I

%

I C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 1 0 ) ( 1 ) I

% % % % %

1 O0

1 0 0 3

I I ITrès s a t i s f a i t / IVery s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / IFa i r ly s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / / N o t very s a t i s f i e d lPas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / [Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Isans réponse/do rep ly

I Tot a l 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1008 1010 998

1 9 8 5 I 1986 I 1 9 8 6 1 1987

ESPAFIA I 1987

( 1 ) Y compris l a Grèce 2 p a r t i r d ' a v r i l 1981. / Including Greece from April 1981.

- B 12 -

l i l i 1 1 1

( T r è s s a t i s f a i t / (Ve ry s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse/No r e p l y

Tot a l

N

% % %

TABLEAU B1 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B1 ( c o n t i n u e d )

-

I

%

PORTUGAL

1000

1985 x - X I

%

3

53

1000 ’ 1000 1000

28

15 1

1 O0

% l T r è s s a t i s f a i t / P l

1000

%

1986 I 1986 I 1987 I 1987

I Tot a l I 100

111849

1 O0 1 O0

11831 11837

I I

11651

% I

% I

%

11583

i i I I l I I I I I I I I I

57 I 63 I 62 I 67

25 I 24 I 25 I 19

1 2 1 7 1 8 1 5

I l I

I I I

m 7 I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I il Í

I I COMMUNAUTE / C O M M U N I T Y (EUR 12) (1)

-Gl--&- -2-p- I V I x - X I

I I I

‘23 I 19

57 I 56

15 I 18

4 1 6

I T-p- I

I I I l I I l

I LJ”d I

I I I l I I I

i- 7

( 1 ) Y compr i s l ’Espagne e t l e P o r t u g a l . / I n c l u d i n g Spa in and P o r t u g a l .

- 6 1 3 -

TABLEAU 82 / TABLE 82

I

LE S E N T I M E N T DE SATISFACTION Q U A N T A U FONCTIONNEMENT DE LA DEMOCRATIE /

1

THE FEELING OF SATISFACTION W I T H T H E W A Y DEMOCRACY WORKS

1 O0

1266

Dans l ' e n s e m b l e , ê t e s- v o u s t r è s s a t i s f a i t , p l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t , p l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t ou p a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t du f o n c t i o n n e m e n t de l a d é m o c r a t i e ( d a n s v o t r e p a y s ) ? / On t h e who le , a r e you v e r y s a t i s f i e d ,

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1077 988 1006 1013 1008 983 1032 1022 973

f a i r l y s a t i s f i e d , n o t v e r y c o u n t r y ) ?

1 O0

1210

s a t i s f i e d , o r n o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d w i t h t h e way.democracy w o r k s ( i n y o u r

1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1020 1038 995 1018 1035 1016 1011 1007 999

I I I l I I [ T r è s s a t i s f a i t / ( V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / l N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d [ P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d [Sans réponse /No r e p l y I I T o t a l

I N

I I I I I l I ( T r è s s a t i s f a i t / [ V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / ( N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d I Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / [ N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d [Sans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

- 8 14 -

% T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % % % % %

TABLEAU 8 2 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 8 2 ( c o n t i n u e d )

i

I

1987 I V %

8

45

27

13 7

1 O0

1010

DANMARK

BELGIQUE/BELGIE I

I 1'

I I I I I I I I

i I

i l

i I

6 1 I I I

l % l % / T r è s s a t i s f a i t /

39 I

% % % % % % % %

I

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0

I 1199 962 1010 992 983 1002 1073

8 1 I I I I I I I I~ 1 O0

1005

1 O0 100 100

1029 1024 1009

I DANMARK

% % % % % % J T r è s s a t i s f a i t / 1 % % % %

1 T o t a l I 100 1 O0

I 1211 995

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100 100 100

1027 1000 996 990 1030 995 1043 997

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

IN

1987

- B 1 5 -

TABLEAU 82 ( s u i t e ) / TABLEAU 82 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1987

%

DEUTSCHLAND

1 1973 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1978 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 I 1980 I 1981

% % % % % % % % I

100

992

100

1002

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

% % % % % % T r è s s a t i s f a i t / P l

I I I - I V / x .-T-l-T- 12 I 8

I

I

I

56 I 59

21 I 22

7 1 4

1 ,i-t-d

% % %

N I 1328 I 1012

T o t a l I 100

N I 1957

DEUTSCHLAND

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1007 1005 999 996 1006 1003 1005 1008 962

1983 1983 1984

12 I 7 I 12

1984 1985

i i 59 I 59 I 59

1985

i i I I

18 I 21 I 19

4 1 3 1 3

% % %

1049 1 1058 I 992

% % %

100 100 100

I I I- IV I x- XI I

11 I 12 I I I

I I I I

2 1 4 1 3 1 3 1

69 I 59 I

15 I 22 I

-7J-J 100 100

1053 1007

, 100

1028

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / No t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1987

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1987

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / V e r y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

%

I T o t a l

I,

% % % % % % % % %

- 8 1 6 -


1980 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985

1 0 0

1000

100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1000 1199 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

1986 1986 1987 1987

% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1000

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1000 1000 1000

- 8 17 -

1973

,TABLEAU 82 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 82 (con t inued)

1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979 1979 1980 1981 i I ITrès s a t i s f a i t / /Very s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / [ F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / (Not very s a t i s f i e d IPas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / /Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d (Sans rkponse/No reply

I Total

IX %

I N

XI I IV-v I x-XI 1 v-VI I x-XI I IV I x I x-XI x-XI I , % % % % % % % % ' %

100 100

2227 1356

1 O0 100 100 100 1 0 0 ' 100 100 100

1256 1149 1276 1194 1152 986 986 1006

I FRANCE

/Tras s a t i s f a i t / IVery s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / ( F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d IPIu tô t pas s a t i s f a i t / [ N o t very s a t i s f i e d / P a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / \ N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d /Sans réponse/No rep ly

I Total

%

I N

% % % % % % % % %

I 1982 I 1982 1 1983 1 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I

1 O0

1199

1 O0 1 O0 1 O 0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 100 100

939 1011 1000 1008 1006 1017 1006 1004 994

% Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d

' P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / ' N o t very s a t i s f i e d 'Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans rkponse/No rep ly

I

I Total

I N

% L % % % % % % %

I FRANCE I

% % L % % % % % % %

1 O0

1002

I 48 I 39 I I l I I I I I I

1 O0

998

I I I I l 31 I 34 I I I I I I f 10 1 15 I l

l I I I I I I I

- 8 1 8 -

% % % % % % % % T r è s s a t i s f a i t / P l


%

Sans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y I 2 I 6 I 5 I 9 I 7 I 10 I 10 I 6

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100

N I 1199 981 1008 997 1005 1005 997 1006

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

6 I 10 I, 100 100

1007 985

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

%

IRELAND I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 1

% % % % % % % % %

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1181 1007 987 1002

12

44

22

11

1 O0

1000

s l 6 1 6 1 7 l I I

l I I

I I I

41 I 39 I 37 1 43

28 I 30 I 29 I 27

16 I 19 I 20 I 16

1 O0 100 100 100

1008 1009 1008 1002

s l 6 1 6 1 7 l I I

l I I

I I I

41 I 39 I 37 1 43

28 I 30 I 29 I 27

16 I 19 I 20 I 16

100

1007

% %

6 1 8 I

I

I

38 I 41

30 I 28

20 I 17

% % % % % % % %

6 1 1 0 1 4

40 I 42 I 40

27 I 23 I 29

20 I 18 I 19

I I

I I

I I

1 O0

1005

1 O0

997

IRELAND I

I I I i l i I i 46

24

15

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I


- B 19 -

T A B L E A U B 2 ( s u i t e ) / T A B L E 82 (con t inued)

[Sans réponse/No rep ly I 1 1 3 I 2

I Total I 100 1 O0 1 O0

I 1909 1052 1025

(Très s a t i s f a i t / IVery s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y sa t i s f i ed ( P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t /

3 1 3 1 3 1 2 2 I. 2 3

1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1155 I 1175 1030 1178 1170 I 1108 I 1070

I ITALIA I

l % l % Très s a t i s f a i t /

I 1973 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1978 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 I 1980 I 1981

% % %

I IX I XI I IV-v I x-XI I v-VI I x-XI 1 'IV I x 1 x-XI 1 x-XI 1 I l % % % % % % % % %

%

I 2 1 1 1 1 I I I

l I I I 25 I 13 1 11

% % % %

1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 , 2 1 3 1 4 1 I I I l ' I I I

I I I I I I I 18 I 24 I 18 I 14 I 19 I 18 I 16 I

Total I 100

N 1301

100 100 I00 100

1025 1031 1033 1060

I ITALIA I 1 1982 1 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 1 1986

100

1097

100 100 100 100

1127 1047 1103 1097

I I ITALIA

% P l % % % ¡Tres s a t i s f a i t / IVery s a t i s f i e d \ P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / ] F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / l N o t very s a t i s f i e d / P a s s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ISans réponse/No rep ly

I Total

I N

I i i I 28 I 24 I I I I I 42 I 46 I I ' I I I 25 I 26 I I 3 1 2 1 I I I 100 I 1 O0 ~~

- I

i 1053 I 1031 i I

% i i

I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I

% %

77 I +,

n

I I I I I l I I I I I I I I

I

- - I l

- 8 2 0 -

%

T A B L E A U 82 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 82 (con t inued)

% % % % % % % % % Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not very s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse/No rep ly

Total

N

1 O0

330

LUXEMBOURG I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100

301 302 344 322 29 1 299 298 300 500

1973 I 1976 I 1977 1 1977 I 1978 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 1 1980 I 1981 I

l % l % Très s a t i s f a i t / % % % % % % % %

i I i i i i I I i i 28 I 21 I 22 I 20 I 24 1 29 I 29 I 23 1 17 I 18 I

Total I 100

u I 399

100 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

300 300 304 300 299 300 300 299 301

LUXEMBOURG I

% % I % / % % Très s a t i s f a i t /

% % % % %

Total I 100

N I 287

1 O0

302

- B 2 1 -

1973 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979 1979 1980

TABLEAU 82 ( s u i t e ) / TAELE E 2 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1981

( T r è s s a t i s f a i t / I V e r y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d l P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ISans rCponse/No r e p l y

I To t a l

I N

% % % % % % % % % %

1 0 1 1 1 4 ) 4

100 100 100 100

1464 1123 1033 943

I * JT rès s a t i s f a i t /

I Y e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / I F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d ( P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / 1 Nlo t v e r y s a t i s f i ed ( P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / l N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d ISans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

4 1 4 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 5 1

100 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1131 913 974 1092 1114 1011

NEOERLAND

1 % ) % % % % % % % T rès s a t i s f a i t /

7

% %

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

FI 1 1228 1056 998 1050 1015 1018 985

100 100 100

1068 1001 1026

% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1004

1 O0

96 5

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / Not v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t d u t o u t / Vot a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% %

- 8 - 2 2 -

TABLEAU 82 ( s u i t e ] / TABLE 82 ( c o n t i n u e d l

% % % % % % % %

100 100 I 0 0 100

1933 1351 1414 1351

I O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1426 1339 1317 1403 1432 1395

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

I

_ _

G R E A T BRITAIN (1973) and U N I T E D KINGDOM

G R E A T BRITAIN (1973) and UNITED K I N G D O M

% % % I T r è s s a t i s f a i t / P l % % % % % %

I Tot a l I 100

I 1419

I00 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100

1335 1348 1277 1355 1405 1443 1383 1378 1318

% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1306

1 O0

1308

T r è s s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1973 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978

l T r è s s a t i s f a i t / / V e r y s a t i s f i e d [ P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / ( F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d l p l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / [ N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d [ P a s s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / ( N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d (Sans rkponse /No r e p l y

1 T o t a l

I N

1979 1979 1980 1981

- B 2 3 -


% % % % % % % % % %

100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100

13484 9210 9044 8936 9327 8788 8976 9021 9001

100

9911

I I I I I I I I I I l I

30 I 28 I 30 I 28 I 30 I 32 I 31

14 I 16 I 15 I 14 I 14 I 13 I 14

1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986

7 1 7 1 8 1 I I I

42 I 47 I 43 1

% x

l I I

I I * I 31 I 28 I 30 I

14 I 12 I 13 I

% % % % %

6 1 6 1 6 1

% % %

11676 9689

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t p a s s a t i s f a i t / N o t v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse /No r e p l y

9790 9725 9746 9909 9936

I T o t a l

I N

9846

1 1987 I 1987 I

9822 9827

I C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 10) ( 1 )

I I l % l %

% I I

I I l l I I

% % % % %

I I I I I I I I

I 100

I 9 6 5 2

-t-t I I

I 1 I I I l I I I I I I l l

$It(

-ti 100

9566

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e 1980 / I n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1980.

I l T r 6 s s a t i s f a i t / [ V e r y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d I P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / (No t v e r y s a t i s f i e d lPas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / [ N o t a t a l l s a t i s f i e d /Sans réponse/No r e p l y

I T o t a l

1985 1986 1986 1987

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse/No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1987

- 8 2 4 -

TABLEAU 8 2 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 82 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % % %

1 O0 100 ' 100

1003 1008 1010

14 I 17 I 20 I 17 I 16 I I ' I I I I I I

1 O0 1 O0

998 1016

37 I 34 I 36 I 32 I 39 I

27 I 30 I 22 I 31 I 27 I I 1 I 1 I

I I I I I 1 2 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1

1985 1986 1986 1987 1987 I % % %

COMMUNAUTE / C O M M U N I T Y (EUR 12) ( 1 )

% % % % % %

Très s a t i s f a i t / Very s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t s a t i s f a i t / F a i r l y s a t i s f i e d P l u t ô t pas s a t i s f a i t / Not v e r y s a t i s f i e d Pas s a t i s f a i t du t o u t / Not a t a l l s a t i s f i e d Sans réponse/No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1000 1000 1000 1000

1 O0

1000

%

( 1 ) Y compr i s l 'Espagne e t l e P o r t u g a l à p a r t i r d l oc tob re /novembre 1985 / I n c l u d i n g Spa in and P o r t u g a l f r om October/November 1985.

% % % % % % . % %

I 100

111849

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

11831 11837 11651 11583

- B 2 5 -

1 I

TABLEAU B3 / TABLE 83

I

L'ATTITUDE FONDAMENTALE A L'EGARD DE LA SOCIETE / BASIC ATTITUDE TOWARDS SOCIETY

100

1298

Sur c e t t e c a r t e (MONTRER C A R T E ) ' s e t r o u v e n t t r o i s a t t i t u d e s f o n d a m e n t a l e s v i s - à - v i s de l a s o c i é t é dans l a q u e l l e n o u s v i v o n s . V o u l e z- v o u s c h o i s i r l ' a t t i t u d e q u i c o r r e s p o n d l e m i e u x à v o s i d é e s p e r s o n n e l l e s ? (UNE SEULE REPONSE). 1.11 f a u t c h a n g e r r a d i c a l e m e n t t o u t e l ' o r g a n i s a t i o n de n o t r e s o c i é t é p a r une a c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e . 2.11 f a u t a m é l i o r e r p e t i t 1 p e t i t n o t r e s o c i é t é p a r des r é f o r m e s (1 ) . 3.11 f a u t d é f e n d r e c o u r a g e u s e m e n t n o t r e s o c i é t é a c t u e l l e c o n t r e t o u t e s l e s f o r c e s s u b v e r s i v e s . / On t h i s c a r d (SHOW CARD) a r e t h r e e b a s i c k i n d s o f a t t i t u d e s v i s - à - v i s t h e s o c i e t y we l i v e i n . P l e a s e c h o o s e t h e one w h i c h b e s t d e s c r i b e s y o u r own o p i n i o n . 1.The e n t i r e way o u r s o c i e t y i s o r g a n i z e d m u s t b e r a d i c a l l y changed b y r e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n . 2 .0ur s o c i e t y m u s t be g r a d u a l l y i m p r o v e d b y r e f o r m s (1). 3 .0u r p r e s e n t s o c i e t y must be v a l i a n t l y d e f e n d e d a g a i n s t a l l s u b v e r s i v e f o r c e s .

l i

100 100 1 0 0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

1077 988 1006 1013 1008 983 1032 1009

I I I I I I [ A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n l R é f o r m e s / R e f o r m s [ D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / [ D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n [ S a n s r.éponse/No r e p l y

I T o t a l '

I M

I

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Rd fo rmes /Re fo rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

I I I

BELGIQUE / BELGIE I

1 O0

1022

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

949 973 1210 1020 1038 9 9 5 1018 1035

1970 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1978 I 1978 i 1979 I 1979 I 1980 I I I - I I I I X I i I V - v i x - X I i v - V I i x - X I i I V i x i I V i

% I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % 1 i i i i i i i i i

3 1 5 1 6 1 4 1 4 1 6 1 5 1 7 1 9 1

x - X I I I V I x - X I / I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x - X I 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

(1) En 1.970: p a r des r é f o r m e s i n t e l l i g e n t e s . / I n 1970: by i n t e l l i g e n t r e f o r m s .

- B 2 6 -



1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

( A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / [ R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n I Réfo rmes /Refo rms / D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / 1 D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n I S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1987

J T o t a l

I N

% ,% % % %

I I A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n I Réfo rmes /Refo rms / D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / I D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n [ S a n s réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

% % % %

3 1 7 1 8 6 12

1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0

1016 1011 1007 999 1010

9

1 O0

1005

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Ré fo rme s / R e f o rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans réponse /No r e p l y

1970 1976 1977 1977 1978

I T o t a l

1978 1979 1979 1980

% % % % % % % % %

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

962 1010 992 983 1002 1073

1 O0 1 O0

1029 994

1980 1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

% % % % % % % % %

I 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

I 1024 1006 1009 1211 995 1027 1000

1 O0 1 O0

996 990

- 8 2 7 -

1985 1985


1986 1986 1987 1987

1 A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i .on 1 R d f o r m e s / R e f o r m s I D k f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n ( S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% %

I T o t a l

I N

1 O0 1 O0

1030 995

100 100 1 O0 1 O0

1043 997 992 1002

I I I - I I I ] X I I IV-v I x-XI I v- VI I x-XI I I V % % % % % %

I 1 A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e /

DEUTSCHLANO

1 1980 I 1981 I 1981 1 1982 I 1982 1 1983 1 1983 I 1984 I 1984

X I I V I % %

\ T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

I 2021 1007 1005 999 996 1006 1003 1005 1009

\

% % % % % % A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / P l % %

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

N 1 1008 1004 962 1328 1012 1049 1058 992

100

1053

- B 2 8 -

% P l

T A B L E A U 83 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 83 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % % %

I DE UTSCHLAND '- I

1 100

I 1007

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Réformes/Reforms Défense c o n t r e l a subve rs ion / Defence a g a i n t s subve rs ion Sans réponse/No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1028 987 1084 994 957

% I A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / P l % % % % % % %

I I E L L A S I

I T o t a l I 100

I 1000

I I I I 1 I I , I , c

100 100 100 100 100 roo 100 100

1000 1000 1199 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

.-

II I ELLAS I

% % % A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / P l % % % % %

(1 T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

I 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

- 8 2 9 -

T A B L E A U 83 [ s u i t e ) / T A B L E 63 (con t inued)

% ¡Action , r évo lu t ionna i re / I Revolut ionar y a c t ion (Rkformes/Reforms /Défense con t re l a subversion/ (Defence a g a i n s t subversion ISans réponse/No reply

1 Total

% % % % % % % %

/Action r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I Rev o l u t ion a r y a c t i on I Rdformes/Reforms (Défense con t re l a subversion/ /Defence a g a i n s t subversion ISans réponse/No reply

I Tot a l

100

2046

I N

100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1356 1256 1149 1276 1194 1152 986 993

F R A N C E I 1970 I 1976'1 1977 I 1977 I 1978 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 I 1980

1980 1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

% % % % % % % % %

1 O 0

986

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 oò 1 O0 1 O0

991 1006 1199 939 1011 1000 1008 1006

Action r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / % %

Total I 100 1 O0 100 100 100 100

N I 1017 io06 1004 994 1 a w 998


1970 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979 1979

6

1980

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Ré fo rmes /Refo rms Défense c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans rCponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % % % % %

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Réforme s / R e f o rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

%

I REL AND I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

981 1008 997 1005 1005 997 1006

1 O0

1008

1980 1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

% % % % % % % % %

~~ 1 - I R E L A N D

100 100 100 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1007 1005 985 1181 1007 987 1002 1000

1 O0

1008

% % % % % ( A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / P l % % %

I T o t a l I 100

I 1009

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1008 1002 1007 1005 997

I I A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n IRé fo rmes /Refo rms I D k f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / [ D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n [Sans réponse /No r e p l y

/ T o t a l

I N

1970 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979 1979

- 9 3 1 -


- 1 9 8 0

¡ A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / ( R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n I ' R B f o rme s/Re f o r m s ( D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / I D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n ]Sans rkponse /No r e p l y

% % % % % % %

1 To t a l

I N

% %

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i on Réfo rmes /Refo rms Défense c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / Defence a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T,otal

IN

100

1822

100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

1052 1025 1155 1175 1030 1178 1170 1116

% % % % % x % ' % %

I T A L I A I 1980 I 1981 I 1981 I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 1

1108 1183 1070 1301 1025 1031 1033 1060 1097

S i 8 1 6 1 7 1 7 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 61 I 61 1 61 I 65 I 66 I 71 I 68 I 72 I 72 I 29 I 29 I 29 I 23 I 22 I 19 I 21 I 17 I 18 I

I l I I I I I I I 4 1 2 1 4 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 5 1 5 1 4 1

% % % % % % % % %

I T A L I A 7

3 1 3 1 5 1 3

1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1127 1047 1103 1097

1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I 1987 1 1987 I I I -7

5 5

100 1 O0

1053 1031


% ~c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / Rev o l u t i on a r y a c t i on Rk fo rmes /Refo rms Défense c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / De fence a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

u

% % % % % % % %

LUXEMBOURG

1970 I i 976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1978 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 I 1980 11-1111 X I I I V - v I x - X I I v - V I I x - X I I I V I x I I V I

100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1980

335 1 301 I 302 I ' 344 1 322 I 291 I 299 I 298 I 300 I

1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

I I LUXEMBOURG

% % % I A c t i o n r C v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I Rev o l u t i o n a r y a c t i on 1 RCfo rmes /Refo rins [ D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / ] D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n ISans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% % % % % %

I T o t a l

I N 300

i I

I I I I I

I

I - I 300 500 399 300 300 304 300 299

I LUXEMBOURG

5 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 2

% I A c t i on r é v o l u t i onna i r e / P l

64 I 66 I 67 I 64 I 60 1 67 I 65 I 72 I 64 I I I I I I I I

% % % % % % %

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0

I 300 300 299

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

301 287 302

- B 3 3 -

1970 1976 1977 1977 1978

TABLEAU 8 3 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 8 3 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1978 1979 1979 1980

R c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n R k f o rme s / R e f o r m s D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% %

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n RCfo rmes /Re fo rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % % % %

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Ré fo rme s / R e f o rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans rdponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 OD 1 O0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0

1230 1123 1033 943 1131 913 974 1092

1 0 0

999

1 9 8 0 1 9 8 1 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

% % % % % % % % %

1114 I 1 0 9 1 I 1011 I 1228 1 1056 1 998 1 1050 I 1015 I 1018 I 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 0 0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1985 1 9 8 5

5 1 5 1 4 1 3 . 1 3 1 2 1

l I l I I I 6 1 I 6 3 1 6 3 1 6 0 I 62 I 6 6 I

2 8 1 26 I 29 I 29 I 29 I 24 1

1986 1986 1987 1987 I

6 1 6 1 4 1 8 1 6 1 8 1 I l I

% % % % % % % % %

985 1 0 6 8 1 0 0 1 1026 1004 965

- 8 3 4 -


% % % % % - A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / P l % % %

I I UNITED KINGDOM I

T o t a l I : 1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

N I : 1351 1414 1351 1426 1339 1317

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n RCfo rmes /Re fo rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1 O0 100

1403 1454 ~-

T o t a l

N

% P l % % % % % % %

II II II II II

I; I

I 100

I 1432

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Ré fo rme s / R e f o r m s D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r d p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1369 1395 1419 1335 1348 1277 1355 1405

1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987

% % % % % % % % - %

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1443 1383 1378 1318 1306

1 O0

1308

- 8 3 5 -


1970 1976 1977 1977 1978 1978 1979

k t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / ?ev o l u t i on a r y a c t i on ? C f o r m e s / R e f o r m s l é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / l e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

l o t a l

v

1979 1980

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n R k f o r m e s / R e f o r m s Dé fense c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / De fence a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % % % %

I COMMUNAUTE / COMMUNITY (EUR 10) ( 1 ) I

% %

: 9210 9044 8936 ' 9327 8788 8976 9021 8882

: i 8 1 8 1 6 1 5 1 7 1 5 1 7 1 6 1 : I 6 0 1 5 5 1 ' 5 5 1 5 5 1 5 9 1 6 2 1 5 7 1 5 5 1

: I 2 6 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 7 1 2 6 1 2 9 1 3 1 1 : I 6 1 6 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 8 1

I I I I I I I I I

1980 1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

% % % %

COMMUNAUTE / COMMUNITY (EUR 10) ( 1 ) I

% % % % %

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n IR 6 f o r 111 e s / R e f o r m s

1 O0

10001

I 1985 I 1985 IIII-IVI x-XI

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 100 I 9898 9911 11676 9689 9790 9725 9746 9909

p-p- I 5 1 5

1986

I 63 I 63

1986 1987 1987

D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / I I

Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y I s l 6 IDefence a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n 1 26 I 26

I I

%

To t a l I 100 I 100 I'

% % % % %

N I 9926 I 9846

100 100 1 O0 1 O0

9822 9827 9652 9566

5 1 4 1 5 1 4 1 I 61 1 62 I 62 I 65 I I

I I I I I 28 I 28 I 26 I 25 I I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce d e p u i s o c t o b r e 1980. / I n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1980.

/

- 8 3 6 -

1986 1986 1987 1987


I

I

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n Ré fo rmes /Re fo rms D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r b p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % %

A c t i o n r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / Rev o l u t i o n a r y ac t i o n R k f o r m e s / R e f o r m s D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n / D e f e n c e a g a i n s t s u b v e r s i o n Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

%

- 1985 x - X I

1 O0

1008

%

6 69

8 17

1 O0

- 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1010 998 1016 1003

1985 1986 1986 1987 1987

%

I %

I %

I %

% % % % % % % %

I I I I I I 1 I I I I I

1 O0

1000

100 100 1 O0 1 O0

1000 1000 1000 1000

[ % I % % % % % % % %

I I COMMUNAUTE / COMMUNITY ( E U R 12) ( 1 ) I

1 T o t a l I 100

111849

100 100 1 O0 1 O0

11831 11837 11651 11583

I I A c t i on r é v o l u t i o n n a i r e / I R e v o l u t i o n a r y a c t i o n I R b f o r m e s / R e f o r m s ] D é f e n s e c o n t r e l a s u b v e r s i o n /

I 5 1 5 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 I I l I I 63 I 61 I 63 I 64 1 66 I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l ?i p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e- n o v e m b r e 1985. / I n c l u d i n g S p a i n a n d P o r t u g a l f rom Oc tober- November 1985.

- 6 3 7 -


A T T I T U D E A L'EGARD OE L'UNIFICATION DE L'EUROPE OCCIDENTALE /

ATTITUDE TOWARD THE UNIFICATION OF WESTERN EUROPE

D ' u n e f a ç o n g é n é r a l e , ê t e s- v o u s p o u r Q U c o n t r e l e s e f f o r t s q u i s o n t f a i t s p o u r u n i f i e r l ' E u r o p e o c c i d e n- t a l e ? S I P O U R , ê t e s- v o u s t r è s p o u r ou p l u t ô t p o u r ? S I C O N T R E , ê tes- vous p l u t ô t c o n t r e ou t r è s c o n t r e ? / I n g e n e r a l , a r e you f o r , o r a g a i n s t e f f o r t s b e i n g made t o u n i f y Western Europe ? I F FOR, a r e you v e r y much f o r t h i s , o r o n l y t o some e x t e n t ? I F A G A I N S T , a r e you o n l y t o some e x t e n t a g a i n s t o r v e r y much a g a i n s t ?

Données p r o v e n a n t p o u r l e s années 1962/1967, y c o m p r i s j u i n 1962, des sondages commandi tés p a r l a U.S. I n f o r m a t i o n Agency e t , p o u r l e s années s u i v a n t e s , a i n s i que p o u r f é v r i e r l m a r s 1952, des sondages commandi tés p a r l a Commission des Communautés européennes. N o n o b s t a n t q u e l q u e s d i f f é r e n c e s de f o r m u l a t i o n , l a q u e s t i o n é t a i t i n i t i a l e m e n t : I I Etes- vous en g é n é r a l p o u r o u c o n t r e l e s e f f o r t s q u i s o n t f a i t s e n vue d ' u n i f i e r l ' E u r o p e o c c i d e n t a l e I ' ? En Grande- Bre tagne (de 1955 'a 1 9 6 7 ) , en Al lemagne ( d e f é v r i e r 1955 'a a v r i l 1956, a i n s i q u ' e n j u i n 1962) , en I t a l i e ( e n 1955 e t 1962) , l a q u e s t i o n p r é c i s a i t : " . . . l 'Europe o c c i d e n t a l e , y c o m p r i s l a Grande- Bretagne" . En 1970, 1973 e t 1975, il é t a i t demandé aux i n d i v i d u s i n t e r r o g é s s ' i l s é t a i e n t f a v o r a b l e s , i n d i f f é r e n t s , ou d é f a v o r a b l e s à l ' u n i f i c a t i o n européenne. C f . : " L ' O p i n i o n p u b l i q u e e t l ' E u r o p e des S i x " ; Sondages, P a r i s , no 1 - 1963, p . 46 ; l 'Les Européens e t l ' u n i f i c a t i o n de l ' E u r o p e , B r u x e l l e s , j u i n 1972, pp. 71/72 ; Euro- Baromèt re n o 4 , décembre 1975, pp. 54/56.

The d a t a f o r 1952/1967, i n c l u d i n g June 1962, a r e f r o m s u r v e y s f i n a n c e d by t h e U.S. I n f o r m a t i o n Agency and, f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g y e a r s , as w e l l as F e b r u a r y / M a r c h 1952, f r o m s u r v e y s f i n a n c e d by t h e Commiss ion o f t h e European Communi t ies. N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g some d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e word ing , t h e q u e s t i o n was, i n i t i a l l y , as f o l l o w s : ' \A re you i n g e n e r a l f o r o r a g a i n s t mak ing e f f o r t s t o w a r d s u n i t i n g Western Europe'! ? I n G r e a t - B r i t a i n ( f rom 1955 t o 1967) . i n Germany ( f r o m F e b r u a r y 1955 t o A p r i l 1956, as w e l l as i n June 1962) , t h e q u e s t i o n s p e c i f i e d : "...Western Europe, i n c l u d i n g G r e a t - B r i t a i n " . I n 1970, 1973 and 1975, t h e i n t e r v i e w e d i n d i v i d u a l s were asked whe ther t h e y were i n f a v o u r , i n d i f f e r e n t o r n o t i n f a v o u r o f t h e European u n i f i c a t i o n . C f . : l I l l O p i n i o n p u b l i q u e e t l ' E u r o p e des S i x ; Sondages, P a r i s , n o 1- 1963, p. 46 ; I tEuropeans and European u n i f i c a t i o n f 1 , B r u s s e l s , June 1972, pp. 71/72 ; Euro- Baromèt re n o 4, December 1975, pp. 54/56.

Royaume-Uni ( y c o m p r i s N o r t h e r n I r e l a n d ) à p a r t i r de 1975. / U n i t e d Kingdom ( i n c l u d i n g N o r t h e r n I r e l a n d ) ,

f r o m 1975.

Très p o u r / For v e r y much p l u t ô t p o u r / 'or t o some e x t e n t ' l u t ô t c o n t r e / R g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t Très c o n t r e / R g a i n s t v e r y much '

Sans réponse/No r e p l y

r o t a l

N

:1-111 I 11-111

I I

I

Tp- 3 1 I 3 1

3 4 I 35

4 1 4

1 1 2 3 0 I 29

-zLTo

1973 I 1975 I X 1 v - V I

I

I I

22 1 23

38 I 32

3 1 2

2 1 1 35 1 42

-Gl-G-

BELGIQUE / BELGIE

1975 X %

21

36

3

1 39

1 O0

1 000

-

1978 1 1979 x - X I I I V

I

I I

-7-pT 27 1 27

42 I 44

4 1 6

2 1 1

-%-E-

1979 X %

23

46

6

2 23

1 O0

1032

1980 I V %

20

47

5

2 26

100

1009

1980 x - X I

%

25

40

- 8

2 25

1 O0

1022

- - -

- 6 3 8 -

I 100 I Tot a l

I N I 949


100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 100 100

973 1210 1020 1038 995 1018 1035 1016 1011 ~~

I

I I DANMARK I

BELGIQUE / BELGIE

I !T rès p o u r /

% J T r è s p o u r / P l

1 1973 I 1975 I 1975 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 I 1980 I 1980 I 1981 I 1981 1 I I X I v - V I I x I x - X I I I V I x I I V I x - X I I I V I x - X I I

% % % % % % % % %

% % % % % % % %

(Sans réponse/No r e p l y I 18 I 12

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 I 1007 999

12 I 19

1 O0 1 O0

1010 1005

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

I 1199 1073 1023 1002 1073 1029 994 1024 1006 1009 i

- B 3 9 -

IIII- IV^ x I III-IV I x % % %

T r è s p o u r / P I III-IV I x-XI I III- IV I x-XI I III-IV I X- XI I

% % % . % % %

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

N 1 1211 995 1027 1000 996 990 1022 995 1043

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t

P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

100

997

1987 1987

T r è s p o u r / I F o r v e r y much b l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t

' P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t

I T r è s c o n t r e / 1 A g a i n s t v e r y much k a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% % % % % % % % % %

100

992

100

1002

1952 1954 1955 1955 1956 1956 1957 1962 1962 1964

% )

% % % % % % % % %

100

1591

100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

836 820 813 863 1159 1299 1523 1234 1202

- B 4 0 -

1965

TABLEAU B 4 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 84 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1967 1970 1973 1975 1975 1978 1979 1979 1980

! T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t

% 1

P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r d p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% % % % % % % % %

I T o t a l

I N

1 O0 1 O0

1255 1000

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

2021 1957 1039 1002 1006 1003 1005 1009

1984 1984 1985

%

1980 x-XI

%

38

40

7

2 1 3

100

1008

-

-

% % %

DEUTSCHLAND

%

1981 1981 1982 1982

% %

1 O0

1004

1 O0 1 OD 1 O0

962 1328 1012

III- IV I x - 2 - p T

36 I 34

49 I 42 I

I

I 5 1 6

1 1 2

-5-i-e 1 O0 100

992 1053

100

1007

% I T r è s p o u r / P l % % % % % % % %

I T o t a l I 100

I 1028

1 O0 1 O0 100 100

987 1084 9 94 957

- B 41 -

I 1980 I 1981 I 1981 I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985

T o t a l I 100

N I 1000

( T r è s p o u r / ( F o r v e r y much l p l u t ô t p o u r / (IFor t o some e x t e n t ] P l u t ô t c o n t r e / I A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I Très c o n t r e / l b g a i n s t v e r y much (Sans réponse /No r e p l y I

- 100 100 1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1000 1000 1199 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

I To t a l

I N

%

i ( T r è s p o u r / [ F o r v e r y much l p l u t s t p o u r / l F o r t o some e x t e n t

. I P l u t c t c o n t r e / [ A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t 1 T r è s c o n t r e / ( A g a i n s t v e r y much ISans rkponse /No r e p l y

I Tot a l

% % % % % % % %

1565

G J - T o o o I 1000

x-XI % -

1000

27

I FRANCE I

26

1952 1954 1955 1955

15

1956 1956 1957 1962 , 1962 1964

8 24

1 O0

1 O00

-

% 1

ELLAS I

% % % % % % % % %

100

1345

100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0 100 100

847 900 805 800 1226 I 1200 1518 1307 1215

I - B 4 2 -

I 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

I 1228 1961 2046 2227 1156 1276 1194 1152


100 100

986 993

( T r e s p o u r / [ F o r v e r y much I PI u t ô t p o u r / I F o r t o some e x t e n t

/ P l u t ô t c o n t r e / [ A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I T r è s c o n t r e / l A g a i n s t v e r y much [ S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% % % %

I FRANCE

I 1965 I 1967 I 1970 I 1973 I 1975 I 1975 I 1978 1 1979 I 1979 I 1980 1 I I v-VI I v 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 I I X I v-VI I x I x I I V I x I IV I

% % 1 x 1 % I % l r è s p o u r /

%

i 1980 I 1981 1981 I 1982

T o t a l I 100 100

u I 986 991

100 100 I 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1006 1199 I 939 lGll 1000 1008 1 1006 1017

- o r v e r y much I 17 1 16 i 26 I 24

- o r t o some e x t e n t I 52 I 56 I 54 I 54

4 g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t 1 9 I 9 1 6 'I 8

' l u t ô t p o u r / I l I I

'1 u t 8 t c o n t r e / I I I I

Très c o n t r e / I I I I

I % [ %

I FRANCE

% x

1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I

I T o t a l 1 100 I 1 O0 1 O0

i i 1985 I 1986 1 1986 I 1987 I ( T r è s p o u r /

I N I 1006 I 1004 1 994

39

46

5

2 8

1 O0

1002

FRANCE

x-XI I x(x 34 I

I 50 I

I 4 1

I 1 1 + 7

- 8 4 3 -

i979 1979 1980 1980 1981


T o t a l

N

1981

[ T r è s p o u r / ! F o r v e r y much l p l u t ô t p o u r / ( F o r t o some e x t e n t ( P l u t ô t c o n t r e / I A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I T r è s c o n t r e / ( A g a i n s t v e r y much [Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

% % % % %

1 T o t a l

I N

%

I I T r è s p o u r / / F o r v e r y much [ P l u t ô t p o u r / ( F o r t o some e x t e n t l p l u t a t c o n t r e / / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I T r è s c o n t r e / [ A g a i n s t v e r y much (Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

1 O0 1 O0 100 100

997 1006 1008 1007


I

100 100

1005 985

1973 I 1975 I 1975 I 1978

100 100 1 O0

1199 1000 998

1 O0

1005

1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986

% % % % % % % %

45 I 43 I 41 I 39 I 39 I 41 I

9 1 9 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I

I I l I l I 2 1 5 1 2 1 7 1 8 1 5 1

% %

100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

1181 1007 987 1002 1000 1008 1009 1008

100 100

1002 1007

1987 1987 1 % % % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1GG5

1 O0

997 I

- B 4 4 -

1952


1954 1955 1955 1956 1956 1957 1962 1962 . 1964

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t

P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r d p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% 1 % % % % % % % % %

i i 1965

1 O0

1505

I ( T r è s p o u r /

I P l u t ô t p o u r / l F o r t o some e x t e n t

' [ F o r v e r y much

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100

808 814 803 911 : 1269 1562 1344 1175

v - V I %

65

1

1 1

1967

I P l u t C t c o n t r e / / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t 1 )

4 I T r è s c o n t r e / I ) ( A g a i n s t v e r y much I ) . ISans rgponse /No r e p l y I 31 I 1-

1970 1973 1975 1975 1978 1979 1979 1980

I T o t a l 1 100

I 1166

% % % % % % % %

100 I 100

1023 1822

100 I 100 I 100 100 I 100 1 O0

1909 1043 1110 1030 1178 1170

! !

I I 1980 1 1981 I I T r è s p o u r / ( F o r v e r y much ( P l u t ô t p o u r /

x - X I I I V

I

Tp- 39 I 36

l F o r t o some e x t e n t I 42 I 46

/ A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I 6 1 8 [ P l u t ô t c o n t r e / I I

I T r è s c o n t r e / I I I A g a i n s t v e r y much I l l 3 ISans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y I 12 I 7 I I I [ T o t a l . 1 100 1 100

1981 x - X I

%

40

42

5

2 11

1 O0

1070

1982 I I I - I V

%

32

47

6

1 14

1 O0

1301 -

I T A L I A

Gl-G- Zift x I I I I - I V

28 I 36 I

I

I

47 1 44

6 1 5

2 1 1

-2-E

x I I I I - I V 7-p- 35 I 28

I

I

I

45 I 49

5 1 7

2 1 1

-2-E

x-XI IIII- IV^ 7-p-T 32 I 39 I

I I 53 I 45 1

I I 5 1 4 1

l I 1 1 I I 9 1 1 1 1

loollool' TJJ

- B 4 5 -

l % l % T r è s p o u r /

' TABLEAU 84 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 84 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % % % %

I I P I

I l I I I I I I l l

T o t a l I 100

N I 1047

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1103 1097 1053 1031

I T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much

, P l u t ô t p o u r / I F o r t o some e x t e n t ' P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t

1 T r è s c o n t r e / ' A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

i N

I

%

I T r è s p o u r / IFor v e r y much ( P l u t ô t p o u r / [ F o r t o some e x t e n t l p l u t ô t c o n t r e / / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t 1 T r è s c o n t r e / I A g a i n s t v e r y much ) S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1 T o t a l

% % %

1970 :I-III

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

299 298 300

%

52

24

2

2 20

1 O0

335

1 O0

300

1973 I X

x - X I I I I I - I V 1 x I I I I - I V % % % %

%

47

33

1

19

1 O0

330

x I I I I - I V 1 x - X I 1 I I I - I V 1 x - X I % % % % %

1975 1 1975 v - V I I x

I

I 2 I

I 1 1 *

48 1 47

31 I 39 '

+ì-e-

1 O0

500

LUXEMBOURG

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 100

399 300 300 304 300 299 300 300

1978 x - X I

%

31

43

13

5 8

1 O0

29 1

1979 I 1979 I 1980 I 1980

LUXEMBOURG I 1981 I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I

Y 47 I

I 37 I

- B 4 6 -

% P l


I

% % % % % % % l r è s p o u r / ' o r v e r y much ' l u t ô t p o u r / ' o r t o some e x t e n t ' l u t ô t c o n t r e / 4 g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T rès c o n t r e / a g a i n s t v e r y much

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0

N I 301 287 302

I

- %

1979 1979 1980 1980

I

( T r è s p o u r / l F o r v e r y much l p l u t ô t p o u r / ( F o r t o some e x t e n t [ P l u t ô t c o n t r e / / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I Très c o n t r e / I A g a i n s t v e r y much [ S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I % % %

i N

%


T o t a l

N

9 1 16 I 12 I 26

1 O0 1 O0 100 100

779 1230 1464 1093

NEDERLAND

29 I 7

100 100

1006 913

1962 I 1970 I 1973 I 1975 I 1975 I 1978 [I-IIII 11-111 I IX I v-VI I x I x-XI

1 O0 1 O0

974 1092

62 I 30 I

25 I 44 1 I I

I I 3 1 7 1

I I 1 1 3 1

100 100

999 1114

34 I 37 I I I

I I 8 1 3 1

I I 7 1 5 1

39 I 29 I

1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985

33 I 37 I

I I

31 I 46

4 1 7

3 1 3

1985

% % % % % % % % % ,%

5 1 8 1 1 0 1 8 1 I I I I

3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 100

1091 1011 1228 1056 998 1050 1015 1018 985

100

1068

- 8 4 7 -

1986


1986 1987 1987 i I T r è s p o u r / l F o r v e r y much l p l u t ô t p o u r / l F o r t o some e x t e n t l p l u t ô t c o n t r e / ( A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t l T r è s c o n t r e / I d g a i n s t v e r y much ISans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

%

I N

% % % % % % % % %

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

1001 1026 -1004 965

% % % % % % T r è s p o u r / 1 1 % I % % %

T o t a l I 100 100 1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0

M I 1503 832 805 814 806 1210 1232 :

100 100

1261 1178

% T r è s p o u r / 1 1 % I % % % % % % % %

T o t a l I 100 100 1 O0 100 100 100 100

N 1179 992 : 1933 1328 1438 1339 1317

100 100

1403 1454

- 8 4 8 -

- 1 % I % % T r è s p o u r /


% % ,% % % % %

T o t a l I 100

N I 1432

I U N I T E O KINGDOM

1 O0 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1369 1395 1419 1335' 1348 1277 1355 1405 1443

t

1985 I 1986 1 19d6 I 1987 I 1987 I % T r è s p o u r /

F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / ~~

F o r t o some e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / d g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

u

% % % % % % % % %

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r d p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

u

1 O0

1383

1 O0 100 100 1 O0

1378 1318 1 3 0 6 - 1308

%

E U R 6 I 1962 I 1970' I 1973 I 1975 I 1975 I 1978 I I 9 7 9 I 1979 I 1980 I 1980

% % % % % % % % %

1 O0

6334

40 I 34 I 35 I 39 I 33 I 33 1 34 1 34 I 30 I 32 I I I I I I I I I I I

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

8752 9153 6149 5691 5442 5589 5583 5426 5538

- 8 4 9 -

1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1984


1984 1985 1985

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / .

A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

% % % % % % % % % %

100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100

5 5 i 8 5522 6665 5352 5427 5440 5393 5508 5452

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans réponse /No r e p l y

100

5460

I

1%

/

1G-L I I X I v-VI

I I I 33 I 34 I ' . I I 6 1 5 I I I 5 1 4

I 30 I 35

I 26 1 22 I I

( k l % % % T r è s p o u r /

T o t a l I 100 I 100

N

% % % % % %

COMMUNAUTE / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 10) ( 1 )

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

N I 5399 5501 5350 7221

I

%

1981 I 1981 IV I x-XI

I 43 I 43

I 10 I 9

I 6 1 4

77-p- 26 I 31

15 I 13

TJ-x

% % % % %

1 O0

9150

1 O0 1 O0

8788 8976

1 O0

9021

100 . 100

8882 9001

- 8 5 0 -

TABLEAU 84 [ s u i t e ) / TABLE 84 [ c o n t i n u e d )

1982


I T o t a l

1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985

% % % % % % % %

I k-rzJz-t

% %

1 O0

11676

28 I 32 I 36 I l l I

47 I 45 I 44 I

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100

9689 9790 9725 9746 9909 9936

I

I 9 1 7

4 1 3

9846

I 8 1

I 3 1

9822 9827

1 2 1 1 3 1 9 1

% % f % 3 % % % %

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r /

1 O0

999

l-

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1004 1053 919 996 1016 1033 3463 1003 1008

1987 IV %

37

F o r t o some e x t e n t I 40 ' l u t ô t c o n t r e / I A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t 1 8

Très c o n t r e / I A g a i n s t v e r y much 1 4 Sans réponse /No r e p l y I 11

T o t a l I 100 I-

u I 9652

1 I I I I I I I I I


I T o t a l

I N

7 "I" x-XI I

32 I I

46 I I

8 1 I

3 1

-A-- T


i-t-ì-

% i i

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

% %

I

T - T 19861 III- IV^

37 I I

41 I I

3 1 I

. I

(1) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e 1980.' / I n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1980. ( 2 ) C e n t r o de I n v e s t i g a c i o n e s S o c i o l d g i c a s .

- 8 5 1 -

1986

Très p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some , e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T rès c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans rdponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1987 1987 I


% % % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1010

43 I 44 I 39 I I . I I I I I I

1 O0 1 O0

998 1016

I

I

I

32 1 31

4 1 3

1 .1 2

1982 1983 1983 1984

I 33 I

I 3 1

I 2 1

1985 1986

I I I l l I l I I I I I

% % % % % % % %

1981 I 1982

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1 8 5 3 1 2017 1988 1958

T r è s p o u r / F o r v e r y much P l u t ô t p o u r / F o r t o some e x t e n t P l u t ô t c o n t r e / A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t T r è s c o n t r e / A g a i n s t v e r y much Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l 100 100

1000 1000

i x-XI i III-IV

I 22 I 17 I I I 9 1 10 I I I 2 1 4 I I I 2 1 4 I 65 I 65 I I

% % %

I 100 I 100 I I

% % % % % % %

N I 1971 I .1927

17 I 27 I 23 1 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1000 1000 1000

[ T r è s p o u r / / F o r v e r y much l p l u t ô t p o u r / [ F o r t o some e x t e n t [ P l u t ô t c o n t r e / [ A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I T rès c o n t r e / / A g a i n s t v e r y much [Sans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I I I I I I.

PORT UG AL I

I I I I i I l I I 4 1 6 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 I

I I I I I l I I I 3 1 4 1 I 1 1 4 1 - 3 1 5 1

- 6 - 5 2 -


COMMUNAUTE / C O M M U N I T Y (EUR 12) (1)

Très p o u r / Fo r v e r y much

I I I I 1985 I 1986 I x - X I I I I I - I V

P l u t ô t p o u r / I I Fo r t o some e x t e n t I 45 I 44 P l u t ô t c o n t r e / I I

Très c o n t r e / I I A g a i n s t v e r y much I 3 1 2

A g a i n s t t o some e x t e n t I 9 I 7

Sans réponse/No r e p l y I 14 I .14

T o t a l I 1TJ-Z- I I

N 111849 I 11831

x - X I I I V

I

I I

%I% 37 I 38

42 I 39

7 1 7

3 1 3

11837 I 11651

x - X I I T-p-

33 I I

44 I I

7 1 I

3 1

-3- 11583 I

% i

I I I I I I

-rp-

I +

%

(1) Y compr i s l 'Espagne e t l e P o r t u g a l . / I n c l u d i n g Spa in and P o r t u g a l .

- 6 5 3 -

T o t a l 1 100 100 1 O0

N I 1266 1017 1505


JUGEMENT PORTE SUR L'APPARTENANCE A LA COMMUNAUTE EUROPEENNE / ATTITUDE T O MEMBERSHIP I N THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100

1507 1000 963 1077 988 1006

D ' u n e f a ç o n g é n é r a l e , pensez- vous que l e f a i t ( p o u r v o t r e p a y s ) de f a i r e p a r t i e de l a Communauté Européen- n e ( M a r c h é commun) e s t une bonne chose , une mauva ise chose , ou une c h o s e n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e ? / G e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g , d o y o u t h i n k t h a t ( y o u r c o u n t r y ' s ) membersh ip o f t h e Common M a r k e t i s a g o o d t h i n g , a b a d t h i n g , o r n é i t h e r good n o r bad ?

( T o t a l I 100

I 1013

I BELGIQUE / BELGIE I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

1008 983 965 1032 1009 1022 949 973

100

1210

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1020 1038 995 1018 1035 1016 1011 1007

Bonne chose /Good t h i n g M a u v a i s e c h o s e / B a d t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / N e i t h e r good n o r bad Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

BELGIQUE / BELGIE I I I I - I V j x j I I I - I V j x j I I I - I V j x - X I j I I I - I V j x - X I j I I I - I V j

% I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

( 1 ) V o i r page 8 6 3 / S e e page 8 6 3

- 8 5 4 -

I 1986 I 1987 I 1987 I 1 % % I %

I % I

I I x-XI I I V I x-XI I I X I % I % I

I I

%

I 100 100 100 , I Tot a l

IIII- IV^ x I III-IV 1 x 1 III-IV I x-XI I III-IV 1 x-XI I III-IV 1 I X I X I X I X I X I % I X I % I % I '

I IJ I 999

Bonne chose/Good t h i n g i 33 i 35 i 35 1 35 I 31 I 33 I 29 I 35 I 51 I Mauva ise chose/Bad t h i n g I 30 I 28 1 24 I 26 I 29 I 28 I 31 1 27 I 21 I

N e i t h e r good nor bad Sans rdponse/No r e p l y

T o t a l

Chose n i bonne n i mauva ise / I I I I I I I I I I

( 1 ) V o i r page 8 63 / See , page B 63

1010 1005

DAN MARK I 1 1973 I 1974 I 1974 I 1975 1 1975 I 1976 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I I X I IV-v I x-XI I v-VI I x I v-VI I X I I IV-v I x-XI I X I X I % I % I X I % I % I % I %

I '-

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

N I 1199 1168 1100 1073 1023 977 962 1010 992

;

T o t a l I 100 100 ' 100 100 100

N I 983 1002 1073 1018 1029

100 100 100 100

994 1024 1006 1009

DANMARK

I I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986

~-

- 6 5 5 -

I T o t a l I 100

I 1957


1 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 - 1060 1042 1039 1002 I 0 0 4 1007 1005 999 I

I T o t a l I 100

I N I 1328

I I DEUTSCHLAND I

100 100

1012 1049 1058 992 1053 1007 1028 987

100 100 100 100 100 100

I 1973 I 1974 1 1974 I 1975 1 1975 I 1976 I 1976 I 1977 1 1977 1 I I X 1 IV-v I x-XI I v-VI I x I v-VI I X I I IV-v 1 x-XI I 1 % 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % r

I I DEUTSCHLAND I

i . (Bonne chose/Good t h i n g I Mauvaise chose/Bad t h i n g IChose n i bonne n i mauva ise / [ N e i t h e r good n o r bad ISans réponse/No r e p l y I

1 1978 1 1978 I 1979 1 1979 I 1979 I 1980 I 1980 I 1981 I 1981 1

1 T o t a l I 100 I 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 I 100 1 100 I I 996 I 1006 I 1003 I 807 I 1005 1 1009 1 1008 I 1004 1 962 I

I I DEUTSCHLAND

l I I

I 1982 1 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 1 1985 1 1986 1 I I I I - I V I x i III- IV j x i III- IV i x-XI i I I I- IV j x- XI [ I I I- I V i 1 % 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

- B 5 6 -

I DEUTSCHLAND

I T o t a l I 100

I 1084

1 1981 1 1981 1 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 1

1 O0 1 O0

994 957

I E L L A S I

Isonne chose/Good t h i n g I Mauvaise chose/Bad t h i n g [Chosë n i bonne n i mauvaise/ ( N e i t h e r good no r bad (Sans réponse/No r e p l y

I T o t a l

N I 1000

FRANCE I

1000 1199 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

' T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0

1 T o t a l I 100 100

I 1000 1000

100 1 O0 1 O0

1000 1000 1000

1 O0

2227

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

1308 1237 1156 1276 1241 1356 1256 1149

- 6 5 7 -

1978 1978 1979


1979 197.9 1980 1980 1981 1981

(Bonne chose/Good t h i n g I M a u v a i s e chose/Bad t h i n g IChose n i bonne n i mauva ise / I N e i t h e r good n o r bad ISans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l 1 0 0 1 0 0 100

1276 1194 1152 iN

!O0 100 100 100 100 100

1002 986 -993 986 991 1006

T o t a l 1 100 100 100

N I 1199 939 1011

v-VI j x-XI i IV i VI (1) i x i IV i x-XI i IV i x-XI i % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

100 100 100 100 100 100

1000 1008 1006 1017 1006 1004

N I I 994

I FRANCE I

1002 998

I 1982 I 1982 1 1983 I 1983 1 1984 I 1984 I 1985 1 1985 ' 1 1986 1 IIII- IV^ x ' 1 III- IV I x I III- IV I x-XI I III- IV 1 x-XI 1 III- IV I 1 x 1 % I % I ' % I 2 1 % I % I % I % T

I T o t a l , 1 100 100 100

I N I 1199 1000 1000

100 100 100 100 100 100

1000 998 1007 9 8 1 1008 997

- 8 5 8 -

1978 1978 1979


1979 1979 1980 1980 1981 1981

I I I I [Bonne chose/Good t h i n g I Mauva ise chose/Bad t h i n g IChose n i bonne n i mauva ise / ] N e i t h e r good n o r bad ISans rdponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l 100

1005 i N

100 100, 100 100 100 100 100 100

1005 997 1276 1006 1008 1007 1005 985

I I R E L A N D

Bonne chose/Good t h i n g Mauvaise chose/Bad t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i mauva ise / U e i t h e r good n o r bad Sans réponse /No r e p l y

l o t a l

U

l T o t a 1 I 100

I N 1 1181

ITALIA

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

1007 987 1002 1000 1008 1009 1008 1002

I

( 1 ) V o i r page 8 63 / See page 8 63

T o t a l 1 100

N I 1007

100 100

1005 997

100

1909

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

1030 1021 1043 1110 923 1052 1025 1155

- 6 5 9 -

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1175 1030 1178 985 1170 1116 1108

T A B L E A U 85 ( s u i t e ) / T A B L E 85 ( c o n t i n u e d )

100 100

1183 1070

Bonne chose/Good t h i n g Mauvaise chose/Bad t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i mauva ise / N e i t h e r .good n o r bad Sans réponse/No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

I

I T A L I A I

I T A L I A

1978 I 1978 I 1979 1 1979 1 1979 1 1980 I 1980 1 1981 I 1981 I

I T o t a l I 100 1 0 0 100 100 100 100 100

I 1301 1025 1031 1033 1060 1097 1127

v - V I I x - X I I I V I V I ( 1 ) I x I I V I x - X I 1 I V 1 x - X I I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I '

100 100

1047 1103

I T o t a l I 100 100 100

I 1097 1053 1031

I T o t a l 1 100

I N I 330

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

3 0 8 297 3 1 1 297 268 301 302 344

I l ~

1

I

LUXEMBOURG I

LUXEMBOURG

T o t a l 1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

N I 322 291 299 298 300 300 300 500

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100

N I 399 300 300 304 300

Bonne chose/Good t h i n g Mauvaise chose/Bad t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i mauva ise / N e i t h e r good n o r bad Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

100 100 100 100

299 300 300 ' 299

I T o t a l I 100 100 100

( 1 ) V o i r page 8 63 / See page B 63

~

I 301 287 302

1973 1974 1974 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977 1977

100

1464

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1000 1012 1093 1006 904 1123 1033 943

- 6 6 1 -

100

1131


100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

913 974 1159 1092 999 1114 1091 1011

I I NEOERLANO I

'1982 I982

I I I B o n n e c h o s e / G o o d t h i n g ( M a u v a i s e c h o s e / B a d ' t h i n g [ C h o s e n i b o n n e n i m a u v a i s e / I N e i t h e r g o o d n o r b a d I S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986

i N

100

1228

Bonne c h o s e / G o o d t h i n g M a u v a i s e c h o s e / B a d t h i n g Chose n i b o n n e n i m a u v a i s e / N e i t h e r g o o d n o r b a d

' S a n s re ' ponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

1056 998 1050 1015 1018 985 1068 1001

1987 1987 I

III-IVI x I III-IV 1 x IIII-IV i x-XI i III-IV i x-XI i III-IV i % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

1 0 0

1004

74 I 74 I 77 I 80 I 80 I 79 I 77 I 84 I 8 3 I

100

965

4 1 5 1 4 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 ' 5 1 3 1 2 1 I l I I I I I I I

16 I 1 5 I 1 5 I 10 I 1 3 I 1 3 1 11 I 10 I 11 I

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 -

11986 .I x - X I 1-

N 1 1028 1933

Bonne c h o s e / G o o d t h i n g

Chose n i b o n n e n i m a u v a i s e / M a u v a i s e c h o s e / B a d t h i n g 1 2

N e i t h e r g o o d n o r b a d I 14 Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y 17

I

T o t a l I 100

N I 1026

1031 1039 1328 1438 1077 992 1340 I

- 8 6 2 -

T o t a l I 100 100

1 1038 976


I I r

100 100 100

1351 1697 1414

I . I I

100

945

I UNITED KINGDOM I

I V I I I I X I X I I I I I V - v I V I I x I x- X I 1 v - V I I 1 1976 I 1976 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1977 I 1977 I 1977 I 1978 1

100 100 100

954 1351 1426

I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

33 i 37 i 35 i 29 i 42 I 33 1 37 1 38 I

I 981

I 1 - I I 18 I 22 I 23 I 28 1

1339 1317 925 1009 1403 948 943 1454

1980 1980 1980 1980 1981 1981 1981 1981

I I I leonne chose/Good t h i n g IMauva ise c h o s e / l a d t h i n g IChose n i bonne n i mauvaise/ I N e i t h e r good n o r bad (Sans réponse lNo r e p l y

1982

I T o t a l

I N

100 100 100 1 100 100 100 100 100

1015 1046 921 1432 923 1369 972 1395

~

I UNITED KINGDOM I 1 1978 1 1978 1 1979 I 1979 1 1979 1 1979 1 1980 I 1980 I 1980 1

100

1419

I 48 I 31 I 34 I 42 1 54 I 41 I 55 I 57 1 -49 I I I I I I I I I I I

1982 1982 1982 1983 1983 1983 1983 1984 1984

l I I (Bonne chose/Good t h i n g IMauvaise chose/Bad t h i n g (Chose n i bonne n i mauvaise/ I N e i t h e r good n o r bad (Sans réponse/No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

I 100

1 977

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1335 950 134R 918 910 1277 1898 1013

Bonne chose/Good t h i n g Mauvaise chose/8ad t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i mauvaise/ N e i t h e r good n o r bad Sans réponse/No r e p l y

1 T o t a l

I N ~~ ~~ ~

( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) V o i r page 863 / See Page 8 63

- 8 6 3 -

T o t a l I 100 1 O0

N I 1355 96 1

100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

997 960 1405 930 1443 I 1383 I 1378

Bonne chose /Good t h i n g M a u v a i s e chose /Bad t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / H e i t h e r g o o d n o r b a d Sans réponse -/No r e p l y

T o t a l

N 1 O0

I UNITED KINGDOM I

100 100

Bonne chose /Good t h i n g M a u v a i s e chose /Bad t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / N e i t h e r good n o r b a d Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1973 1974 1974 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977 1977

x - X I I I V I x - X I 1 I l I I l I I

% I I

% I I

X I (3) I I % I % I

I I I I I I 27 I 26 I 24 I I I I I I I

I l I I I I l I I 26 I 25 I 25 I I 1 % I I I I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

42 I 43 I 46 I

100

9153

100 100 -100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

5723 6114 6149 5691 5303 5916 5609 5596

1318 I 1306 I 1308 I I I I I I I

I X i I V - v i x - X I i v - V I i x i v - V I i X I i I V - v i x - X I i % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

(1) I n t e r n a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f C o m m u n i c a t i o n s (London) . (2) S o c i a l S u r v e y s ( G a l l u p P o l l ) . P o p u l a t i o n o f 18 y e a r s and more, o n l y G r e a t B r i t a i n . / P o p u l a t i o n de 18

ans e t au- de là , s e u l e m e n t Grande- Bre tagne . (3) The E u r o p e a n Omnibus S u r v e y . P o p u l a t i o n o f 15 y e a r s a n d more. G r e a t B r i t a i n f r o m 1973 t o 1974 ;

U n i t e d Kingdom a s f rom 1975. / P o p u l a t i o n de 15 ans e t au- de là . G r a n d e- B r e t a g n e de 1973 à 1974 ; Royaume-Uni d e p u i s 1975.

(4) NOP M a r k e t Research . P o p u l a t i o n o f 18 y e a r s a n d more, o n l y G r e a t B r i t a i n . / P o p u l a t i o n de 18 ans e t a u - d e l i , s e u l e i e n t Grande- Bre tagne .

- 8 6 4 -


1 9 7 8 1 9 7 8 1979 1979 1979 1980 1980

I I / B o n n e chose /Good t h i n g I M a u v a i s e c h o s e / B a d t h i n g IChose n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / I N e i t h e r g o o d n o r b a d [Sans re 'ponse/No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 9 8 1 1 9 8 1

Bonne chose /Good t h i n g M a u v a i s e c h o s e / 8 a d t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / N e i t h e r good n o r b a d Sans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

T o t a l #

N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

5913 5442 5589 4918 5583 5426 5538 5518

E U R 6 I

1 O0

5522

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

6665 5352 5427 5440 5393

v-VI i x-XI i IV i V I i x i IV i x-XI I I V I x-XI 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

5508 5452 5460 5399

T o t a l I 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0

N I 5 5 0 1 5 3 5 0 7221

E U R 6 r

1973 1974 1974 1975 1975 1976 1976 1977 1977

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

13484 8 9 2 2 9253 9550 9150

Bonne chose /Good t h i n g M a u v a i s e c h o s e / B a d t h i n g Chose n i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / N e i t h e r good n o r b a d Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

8627 9210 9044 8936

I X i IV-v i x-XI i v-VI i x i v-VI i X I i IV-v i x-XI i % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % i

- B 6 5 -

I T o t a l

I N I 9327

TABLEAU 85 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE E5 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

8788 8976 8126 9021 8882 9001 9898 9911 ~-

1 T o t a l 1 100

111676

I C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 10) (1) I

1 O0 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

9689 9790 9725 9746 9909 9936 9846 9822

I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 1 1985 I 1986 1

T o t a l I 100

N I 9827

IIII- IV^ x I III-IV I x 1 III-IV I x-XI I III-IV I x-XI I III-IV 1 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % i

100 100

9652 9566

T o t a l I 100

N I 1980

I I I I

I I I I

I

I I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1009 1010 999 1004 1053 919 996 1016

- 8 6 6 -

ESPANA

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 1 O0 100

I 1029 1033 1000 1003 1008

1 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 1 1987 I 1987 I t I x I IV I VI-VII I x-XII I III-IV I x-XI I I V I x-XI I I

% % I % % % % % I % I ' I 1 % 1 I

I Mauvaise chose/Ead t h i n g I 8 1 6 1 9 1 7 1 4 1 4 1 8 1 5 1 I IChose n i bonne n i mauvaise/ I l I l I I I I I I ( N e i t h e r qood n o r bad I 16 I 21 19 I 20 I 14 I 16 I 20 I 16 I I

I I 6 0 I 62 I 61 I 57 I 62 I 66 I 58 I 64 ( 1 (Bonne chose/Good t h i n g

1 O0 100 100

1010 998 1016

1965

I I /Bonne chose/Good t h i n g [Mauva ise chose/Ead t h i n g [Chose n i bonne n i mauvaise/ I N e i t h e r good n o r bad ]Sans réponse/No r e p l y

( T o t a l

IN

'

1974 1971 1927 1853 2017 1988 1958 1985

PORTUGAL I

1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987

1980 I 1981 I 1981 I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I x-XI 1 v-VI 1 x-XI I III-IV 1 x-XI I IV I x-XI 111-111 I x-XI I

% I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I '

I I l I I I I I I

24 I 31 I 20 I 24 I 23 I 28 I 30 I 28 I 27 I 6 1 6 1 7 1 7 1 6 1 8 ) 9 1 1 2 ) 1 1 1

11 I 10 I 13 I 14 I 16 I 16 I 23 I 19 I 16 I 59 1 53 I 60 I 55 I 55 1 48 I 38 I 41 I 46 I

I

I T o t a l I 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

I N 111849 11831 11837 11651 11583 , .

I - l l8onne chose/Good t h i n g /Mauva ise chose/Ead t h i n g [Chose n i bonne n i mauvaise/ I N e i t h e r good n o r bad ISans rkponse/No r e p l y I

I % I V I - V I I I x-XI 1,111-IV I x-XI I IV I x-XI I I

% I % I % I % I % I % I % I 28 I 42 I 60 I 67 I 69 I 68 I I I I 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 ) 4 ) 3 ) 4 ) I I I

I I I I I I I I I 17 I 18 I 18 I 15 I 13 I 21 I I I I 4 5 ) 3 0 1 1 8 1 1 4 ) 1 5 ) 7 ) I I I

' I % I

I I I I I I

I Tot a l I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I I I I I 1954 I 1000 I 1000 I 1000 I 1000 I 1000 I

- 8 6 7 -

1983 1984 1984


LE SENTIMENT QUE SON PAYS A BENEFICIE OE SON APPARTENANCE A LA COMMUNAUTE /

1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987 1987

THE FEELING T H A T H I S COUNTRY H A S BENEFITED FROM B E I N G A MEMBER OF T H E EUROPEAN C O M M U N I T Y

Tou t b i e n c o n s i d é r é , es t imez- vous que { ( v o t r e p a y s ) a b é n é f i c i é ou non de son a p p a r t e n a n c e à l a Communauté européenne (Marché commun)? / T a k i n g e v e r y t h i n g i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n , wou ld you say t h a t ( y o u r c o u n t r y ) has on b a l a n c e b e n e f i t e d o r n o t f r o m b e i n g a member o f t h e European Community (Common M a r k e t ) ? Les c h i f f r e s p o u r 1987-1 s o n t e x t r a i t s de l ' é d i t i o n s p é c i a l e 308me a n n i v e r s a i r e " Europe 2000" de l a C.C.E., B r u x e l l e s , Mars 1987, p . A4 / The f i g u r e s f o r 1987-1 a r e t a k e n f r o m t h e S p e c i a l 3 0 t h A n n i v e r s a r y E d i t i o n I lEurope 2000" o f t h e C.E.C., B r u s s e l s , March 1987, p. A4.

35 I 29 I 24 I 24 I 21 I 28

100 100 100 100 100 100

1038 1018 1035 1016 1011 1007

I l I A bén é f i c i é / B e n e f i t ed I N ' a pas b é n é f i c i é / I N o t b e n e f i t e d ISans réponse/No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

15 I 19 I 20 I 19

100 100 100 100

999 1002 1010 1005

T o t a l I 100 100

N I io27 996

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

990 1030 995 io43 997 io03 992 1002

T o t a l I 100

N 1 1049

100 ' 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 100 100 . 992 1053 1007 1028 987 1084 1057 994 957

- 8 6 8 -

I

T A B L E A U 86 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 86 ( c o n t i n u e d )

ELLAS

1 O0 100

I 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 600 1000

1 T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

I I I A b é n é f i c i é I 8 e n e f i t e d / N ' a p a s b é n é f i c i é / 1 Not b e n e f i t e d ( S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1 T o t a l

I N

100

1000

I I I A b é n é f i c i é / B e n e f i t e d ( N ' a p a s b é n é f i c i é / ]No t b e n e f i t e d I S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

iF1

100

A b é n é f i c i é I B e n e f i t e d N ' a p a s b é n é f i c i é / N o t b e n e f i t e d

k a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1011 1008 1006 1017 1006

I T o t a l

I N

1004 994 I 1000 1002 I 998 I

-~

FRANCE I

1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987

1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 1 1986 I 1986 I 1987 I 1987 I 1987 I

1987

III- IV^ III- IV I x-XI I III- IV I x-XI I III- IV I x-XI I I 1 I V I x-XI I % j

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 100

i i i i i i l i I I 21 I 24 I 28 I 26 1 26 I 24 I 25 I 23 I 18 I 21 I

100

987 1000 1008 1009 1008 I 1002 I 1007 I 1399 1005 I 997 I

56 I 59 I 61 I 62 I 67 I 66 I 71 I 58 I 65 I 79 I

1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

- 1 I I I I I l I I I 28 I 29 I 28 I 27 I 24 I 22 I 20 I 28 1 19 I 12 I

1987 1967

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1031 1060 1097 1127 1047 1103 1097 1030 1053 1031

- 8 6 9 -

100 100 100 ' 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 I T o t a l I 100 1 O0


100

I 300 300 299 300 300 299 301 743 287 302

I I I A b é n é f i c i é / B e n e f i t e d I N ' a p a s b é n é f i c i é / ( N o t b e n e f i t e d 1Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

T o t a l I 100

N I 998

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100

1015 1018 985 1068 1001 1026 1044 1004 965

1348 I 1355 1 1405 1 1443 I 1383 I 1378 I 1318 I 1048 I 1306 1 1308 I .-

1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987 1987

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100 100 100

( T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0

I N I 9790 9746 9909

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 100 100

9936 9846 9822 9827 9926 9652 9566

- 8 7 0 -

100 100 100


100 100

A b k n é f i c i k / l e n e f i t e d N ' a pas b é n é f i c i é / Not b e n e f i t e d Sans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

T o t a l I 100 100 100

N I 1000 1000 980

ESPARA 1

100 100

I000 1000

T o t a l I 100 I 100 I 100

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

III-IV/ x-XI I I I I V I x-XI I I % I % I % I % I % I % I

100 100

9 1 2 0 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 2 3 1 i I I I I I I

65 I 52 I 62 I 66 I 54 I I

i i i I I I I I I

1008 I 1010 I 1014 I 998 I 1016 I I I I I I I PORTUGAL I

I % (

I % I

I % I

I % I

I I I I - I V I x-XI I I I I V I x-XI I I 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I

N 111831 1 11837 I 11920 I 11651 I 11583 I I I I I I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e / n o v e m b r e 1985 / I n c l u d i n g S p a i n and P o r t u g a l f rom October /November 1985.

- 8 7 1 -


1971 1973 1974 1974 1975 1975

L'ATTITUDE EN C A S D'ABANDON DU M A R C H E COMMUN / ATTITUDE I F THE COMMON M A R K E T HAD B E E N SCRAPPED

1977 1981

De 1971 3 1973: S i l ' o n vous a n n o n ç a i t demain que l e Marché commun e s t abandonné... En 1974 e t mai 1975: S i l ' o n vous a n n o n ç a i t demain que ( v o t r e p a y s ) q u i t t e l a Communauté européenne (Marché commun) ... A p a r t i r de novembre 1975: S i l ' o n vous a n n o n ç a i t demain que l a Communauté européenne (Marché commun) e s t abandon- née... / f r o m 1971 t o 1973: I f you were t o b e t o l d tomorrow t h a t t h e Common M a r k e t had been sc rapped ... I n 1974 and May 1975: I f y o u were t o b f t o l d tomor row t h a t ( y o u r c o u n t r y ) was l e a v i n g t h e Common Market..:As f r o m November 1975: I 1 you were t o be t o l d tomor row t h a t t h e Common Marke t had been s c r a p p e d ...

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1364 1266 1017 1505 1507 1000 1006 949 973

I I E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be I- de g rands r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y 1 - de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t 1 - un v i f sou lagement / 1 r e l i e v e d ISans réponse/No r e p l y

I To t a l 100

1210 I N

1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1 9 t 5 1986 1986 1987

V I I i I X i I V - v i x- X I i v - V I i x i x - X I i I V i x- X I i I I I - I V ( % I % I % I X I X I X I % I X I X I % I

I T o t a l I 100 100 1 0 0 100 100 100

I 1020 1038 995 1018 1035 1016

100 100 100 100

1011 1007 999 1010

1 x j I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V i x - X I I I I I - I V I x - X I I I I I - I V I x - X I I I V I 1 % 1 % I % I X I % I % I % I % I % I % I

- 8 7 2 -

T o t a l I 100 1 O0

I 1199 1168 N


I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1100 1073 1023 992 1006 1009 1211 995

I I ( E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be I- de g r a n d s r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y 1 - de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t I- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I r e l i e v e d ( S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

-_

I T o t a l

I N

1983 1983

1987 x-XI

%

42

45

3 10

1 O0

1005

1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986

BELGIQUE / BELGIE

1 O0

1027

I %

I % I

I I I l I I l

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0

1000 996 990 1022 995 1043 997

%

E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be - de g r a n d s r e g r e t s /

- de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e /

- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t /

Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y

i n d i f f e r e n t

r e l i e v e d

I Ti-T-G-1

I V I x-XI I % I % i

I I I I

I I I 1

28 I 30 I

27 I 29 I

26 1 27 I 19 I 14 I -zJ-iJ\


- . de 1 ' i n d i f f érer .Ce/



T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O 0

2000 1957 1060 1042

I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 --LJ-LJ 1039 1002 999 1004 962 1328

I I I E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be 1 - de g r a n d s r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y I - de l ' i n d i f f é r , e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t I - un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I r e l i e v e d I- Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985

i N

1986 1986 1987



' - un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t /


v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

L T o t a l

I N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

1049 1058 992 1053 1007

- 6 7 3 -


100 1 O0 100 100

1028 987 1084 994

DEUTSCHLAND - I 1971 I 1973 I 1974 I 1974 I 1975 I 1975 I 1977 I 1981 1 1981 I 1982 I VI I I I X I IV-v I x- XI I v-VI I x I x- X I - 1 I V I x-XI I I I I - I V ~

% I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

52

29

i i I I

I I 57 I 53 1 55

24 I 28 I 27

I I I I I I I I I I I I

I l I I I I 55 I 53 I 53 1 42 1 51 I 51 I

1982 X %

45

30

10 15

1 O0

1012

DEUTSCHLANO 1

I i

5 1 I I

3 1 i 6 1

I

I I I

%- I I I I

I I l I 1 I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I ' I I I I I

12 I I I I I I I I I I 1 O0

957

- 6 7 4 -

I Total I 100 1 O0

I 1000 1000

TABLEAU 87 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 87 (con t inued)

100 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1199 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

1971 1973

I I IEprouveraient/Would be I- de grands r e g r e t s / I very sor ry I- de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t 1 - u n v i f soulagement/ I r e l i e v e d

1974 1974 1975 1975 1977 1981 1981 1982

I I I I - I V 1% I I I 32 I

I 1 1 I 36

1 O0

1806

ELLAS

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

2227 1308 1237 1156 1276 1149 991 1006 1199

1986 I 1987 I 1987 I x-XI I I V I x- XI I

% I % I % I %

i i i %

I % I

I %

I % I

I l l I I I I

%

I lSans réponse/No rep ly I 21

I T o t a l I 100 I 100 1 100 I 100 I I 1000 I 1000 I 1000 I 1000 I

Eprouveraient/Would be - d e grands r e g r e t s /


- u n v i f soulagement/

Sans réponse/No reply

very sor ry


r e l i e v e d

1 Tot a l

- B 75 - I


1983




Sans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

1984 1984 ,1985 1985 1986 G-rK x I III-IV % I % % r--% 1 %

I I I l

I I I . 4 0 I 43 I I I 6 1 4

I 44 I 40

1 10 I 13

% I % I %

I 939 I 1011 I 1000 I 1008 I 1006 I 1017 I 1006 I 1004 I 994

I I I I

I I 42.1 44 I 42

1002

39 I 38 I 46 l I

7 1 4 1 4 11 I 14 I 8

100

qqR

I I I I I I

50 I 53 I 51

1973

37 I 36 I 36 I I

5 1 4 1 3 8 1 7 1 10

1974 1974 1975 1975 1977 1981 1981 1982 1982

I Gt

x-XI 1 IV 1 % I % I

I I I I

49 I 53 I I I

I I 5 1 5 1 9 1 1 0 1

37 I 32 I

100

1999

100 1 O0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1000 1000 1000 998 997 1005 985 1181 1007

I I I E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be I- de g r a n d s r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y I- de l ' i n d i f f b r e n c e l I i n d i f f e r e n t I- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I r e l i e v e d [ S a n s réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N




Sans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

u

v e r y s o r r y


r e 1 i e v e d

FRANCE I

E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be - de grands- r e g r e t s /




T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e 1 i e v e d

1983

E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d b e - de g r a n d s r e g r e t s /

- de l ' ! . n d i f f é r e n c e /



v e r y s o r r y


r e 1 i e v e d

1983 1984 1 9 8 4 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987

T o t a l

1 O0

9 8 7





T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1002 4 0 0 0 1008 1009 1008 1002 1007 1005 997

- B 7 6 -


1 9 7 1 1973 1974 1974 1975 1975 1977 1981 1 9 8 1 1982

1 O0

2 0 0 0

1982 X %

4 2

4 3

3 1 2

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1909 1030 1021 1043 1 1 1 0 1155 1183 1070 1301

1 O0

1025

1 9 8 3 1 9 8 3 1 9 8 4 1 9 8 4 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

I I I I I l I I I

1 0 3 1 1 0 3 3 1060

I I I I I I I I I 2 1 5 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1

1 0 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 9 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 7 1 1 2 1

1097 1127 1047 1103 1097 1053

- 8 7 7 -

T o t a l I 100

N I 302

TABLEAU 87 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B 7 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

330 308 297 31 1 297 344 300 500 399




Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

1984

I T A L I A

1987 I

% I ' I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I x - X I I I

% I % I I . I I I I

I l

I I I I I I

l I I I I I I

l I

l I l

I l

I I I

l I I

I 52 I

I I I

I I

I I

I I

I I I I I I I I I I I l I

36 I I

I I

I I I I

I~ I

I I

I I

I I 2 1 I

10 I I I I I 1 O0

1031

1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

100

300

I 1 1982 I 1983 I 1983

'100 1 O0 100 100 100 100

299 300 300 300 301 287

i x i I I I - I V i x I ' % I % I %

E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be I i i - de granci$. r e g r e t s / I I I

- de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I l I

- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I l I

v e r y s o r r y . I 54 I 57 I 60

i n d i f f e r e n t 1 36 I 32 I 28

r e l i e v e d I 4 1 3 1 7 Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y I 6 I 8 I 5

I I l

T o t a l I 100 I 100 I 1 C O

N I 300 I 300 I 304

I I i l I

l I

I I

64 I 62 I 63

26 I 30 I 29

2 1 5 1 4

I I l I I I I l l I

I l I l I

I I I l I I 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1

1 , 6 1 I 69 1 61 I 58 I

I 29 I 20 I 33 1 34 I

- 8 7 8 -

loti.! I 110

N i 1198


~

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1464 1000 1012 1093 1006 943 1058 1011 1228





v e r y s o r r y


r e 1 i e v e d

I T o t a l

I N

1982

LUXEMBOURG I

1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

x-XI I I % I % I

I I l I I I I I I

I l I I I I I

I I I I I l l

I I I I

l l I

70 I I I I I

I l I I I I I

I I I I I

I I I I

22 I I l I l I I I I

I I I I I I I I I , I I

1 1 I 7 1 I I I I I I

1 O0

302

1986 1987

I


1 O0

1056

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

998 1050 1015 1018 985 1068





T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e 1 i e v e d

1 O0

1001

NEDERLAND

100 100

1026 1004

x i III-IV i x I i III-IV i x-XI i III-IV i x-XI % I % I % I % I % I % I %

I I I I I I 50

34

4

I I I

l I I

l I I

56 I 54 I 51 I 48

31 I 32 I 38 I 41

3 1 4 1 2 1 2

I

I

I

49 I 56

38 I 33

4 1 3

I I

I

I

57 1 . 50

30 I 37

2 1 3

52

33

4

- 8 7 9 -

I T o t a l 1 1 0 0

I 965


T o t a l I 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 100 1 O0

N 1028 924 1013 873 8 8 5 998 8 1 8 1933

1 0 0 100

902 906

UNITED KINGDOM I

1 0 0 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 1 0 0

1054 1055 1007 1031 985 908 817 1006

i 1972 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 I 1973 i

100 1 0 0

1039 988

I l I I E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be I - de g r a n d s r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y I - de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t I- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I r e l i e v e d [Sans rCpc..r,se/No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r page 8 8 1 / See page 8 81.

- 6 8 0 -


U N I T E O K I N G O O M

I 1975 I 1975 I 1976 I 1976 I 1976 I 1976 I 1977 I 1977 I 1977 1 1979

I i

I l I I E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d b e I- de g r a n d s r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y I- de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t I- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I r e l i e v e d I S a n s r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

l E p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d be I- de g r a n d s r e g r e t s / I v e r y s o r r y 1 - de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I i n d i f f e r e n t I- un v i f s o u l a g e m e n t / I r e l i e v e d ] S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

100

I N

I 1328 1438 1077 992 1038 976 945 954 1351 1009

UNITED KINGDOM

1979 1980 1980 1980 1980

I I I I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

948 943 1015

1 O0 1 O0

1046 92 1

1981 11-111

% ( 1 )

18

29

4.9 4

1982 1982 1982 1983 1983 1983 1983 1984 1984

~~

100

923

1984

1981 I V

% ( 2 )

21

29

46 4

% % % % % % % % %

1 O0

1369

%

v I x - X I ( 1 ) . I ( 2 ) % I %

I l

I

I

16 I 21

28 I 34

50 I 39 *

1 O0 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

977 1335 950 1348 918 910 1277 1013 1355

100

960

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r page B 81 / See page 8 81.

- 8 8 1 -

% x % % %

TABLEAU 87 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 8 7 ' ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % i p r o u v e r a i e n t / W o u l d b e - de g r a n d s r e g r e t s /


- u n v i f s o u l a g e m e n t /


T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

100 1 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 I

' 1405 930 1443 1383 1378 1318 1306 1308




r;:r 5 , I i I I :.F :l'i r P F 1 y

T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

EURO 6

1971 1973 1974 1974 1975 1975 1977 1981 1981 1982

-

-;;o1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

8670 9153 5723 6114 6149 5691 5596 5518





T o t a l

N

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

100 100 ~

5522 6665

I EURO 6 I 1 1982 1 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 1 1986 1 1986 I 1987 1

100 100 100

5427 5440 5393

i x 1% l I I 43 I I 38 I 1 6

100 100 100 100 100 100

5508 5452 5460 5399 5501 5350

I 13 I 100

I 5352

III- IV I x I III- IV I x-XI I III- IV I x-XI I III- IV I x-XI I IV I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

( 1 ) S o c i a l S u r v e y s ( G a l l u p P o l l ) . P o p u l a t i o n o f 18 y e a r s a n d more. O n l y G r e a t B r i t a i n . S l i g h t d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e w o r d i n g o f t h e q u e s t i o n : i n 1972: v e r y s o r r y , i n d i f f e r e n t , p l e a s e d ; f r o m V/75: v e r y s o r r y , i n d i f f e r e n t , r e l i e v e d .

( 2 ) The E u r o p e a n Omnibus S u r v e y . P o p u l a t i o n o f 15 y e a r s a n d more. O n l y G r e a t B r i t a i n f r o m 1973 t o 1974 U n i t e d K ingdom f r o m 1975.

- 8 8 2 -

I Tot a l I 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

113484 8922 9253 9550 9150 8936 9898 9911 11676


100

9689

1 I EURO 6 I I 1987 I

I % j

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I l I I I

I I I- de grands r e g r e t s / I I I I I ve ry s o r r y I 51 I l I I I l I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I- de l ' i n d i f f é r e n c e / I I I I I i n d i f f e r e n t I 35 I I I l l I I I- un v i f soulagement/ I I l l l I l l I l I

I I I I I I I I,

I I l

I r e l i e v e d I 4 1 I I sans réponse/-Fo r e p l y I 10 I I I I I I I

I % I

I % I

I x-XI I I % I 1 x 1

IEp rouve ra ien t /Wou ld be I

l l o t a l I 100

I 7221

9790 9725 9746

Eprouvera ient /Would be - de grands r e g r e t s /


- un v i f soulagement/

Sans rCponse/No r e p l y

v e r y s o r r y


r e l i e v e d

I T o t a l

I, 9936 9846

1983 I 1983 I 1984

9822

[II-IV[ x I III- IV % I % I %

i I

41 I I

39 I I

I I I

I

40 I 38

37 I 39

9 I 11 I 10 11 I 12 I 13


1984 x-XI

% L_

39

42

10 - 9 -

1 O0

9909

- -

1985 I 1985 I 1986 III- IV I x-XI I III- IV

% I % I % I I I I

41 I 43 I 43

I i I I

38 I 37 I 36

11 I 10 I 9 10 I 10 I 12

1986 x-XI

%

41

39

10 10

1 O0

9827

1987 IV %

43

37

9 11

1 O0

9652

el x-XI I

7 I I

45 I I

38 I I

8 1

*I 95661

( 1 ) Y compr is l a Grèce 2 p a r t i r d ' a v r i l 1981 / i n c l u d i n g Greece f rom A p r i l 1981.

- 8 8 3 -


T o t a l 1 100

N 1 1003

I I ESPARA I I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I 1987 I 1987 1

100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1008 1010 998 1016

I % I ' I % I

I % I

I % I

I x- XI 1 I I I- IV I x- XI I I V I x- XI I I 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I

T o t a l I 100

N I 1000

1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

1000 1000 1000 1000

T o t a l I 100

N (11849

I

I I I I l I l I I I

I 1 O0 100 100 1 O0

11831 11837 11651 11583

(1) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l 3 p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e / n o v e m b r e 1985 / I n c l u d i n g S p a i n and P o r t u g a l f r o m Oc tober /November 1985.

- 6 8 4 -

1977


1978 1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1985 1986

L'ENTENTE E N T R E LES PAYS DE LA C O M M U N A U T E E U R O P E E N N E AU COURS DES DOUZE DERNIERS M O I S

T H E UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN T H E C O U N T R I E S OF THE EUROPEAN C O M M U N I T Y O V E R THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS

I I

Au c o u r s des 12 d e r n i e r s mo is , à v o t r e a v i s , l ' e n t e n t e e n t r e l e s p a y s de l a Communauté eu ropéenne (Marché commun) a - t - e l l e , dans l ' e n s e m b l e , p l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é , p l u t ô t r é g r e s s é o u e s t - e l l e r e s t é e à peu p r è s sans changement ? / I n y o u r o p i n i o n , o v e r t h e l a s t 12 months,' has t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g be tween t h e c o u n t r i e s o f t h e European Community (Common M a r k e t ) i n g e n e r a l i n c r e a s e d , dec reased , o r s t a y e d a b o u t t h e same ?

I I

I I l I

1 O0

1005

( P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / 1 I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l l p l u t a t r é g r e s s é / I D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l I A peu p r è s sans change- I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same [Sans réponse /No r e p l y

I T o t a l

I

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l P1 u t ô t r é g r essé / Decreased i n g e n e r a l A p e u -p r è s sans change ment /Abou t t h e same Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l I 100

N I 992

I T o t a l

I N

100 100 100 100 100

1002 1006 1009 1211 995

I 2 1 I

I 18 I

I 3 4 I

. I 27 I

I 8 1

I 35 I

I 10 I

I 3 0 I

I 32 I

8

38

32

I l I I

I I I I

l I I I

11 I 11 I 18 I 17 I

25 I 27 I 23 I 23 1

38 I 36 I 38 I 46 1

I 28 I

I 14 I

I 44 I

27 I 3 0 1 28 I 21 1 22 I 26 I 26 I 21 1 1 4 1 14 I 1 0 0 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I

1006 I 1008 I 949 I 973 - 1 1210 1 1020 1 1038 I 995 I 1016 I 999 I

1987 I i i I l

% I % I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I x - X I 1 I

% ( ' % I I I l I I I l l l I

28 I I I I I l I l I I I I I I I I I I I I

1 3 i i i I l I I l I I I I I

4 9 I I I I l I I I I I

I DANMARK l i x - X I i x - X I i I V i x - X I i I I I - I V i x 1 x 1 X I % I % I % I %

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I

P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / I I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l I 1 9

Decreased i n g e n e r a l I 3 1 A peu p r è s sans change- I ment /Abou t t h e same 1 4 0

I l I

l I I

I I I

16 I 11 I 9 } 11

1 9 I 35 1 36 I 35

43 I 35 I 40 I 4 0

12

24

50

1983 1 1983 I 1985 I 1986' I I I I - I V 1 x I I I I - I V I x - X I I

% I % I % I % I I l I i I I I I

I l l I

9 1 1 3 1 1 0 . 1 1 8 1

24 1 30 I 28 I 12 I

49 I 43 1 42 I 53 1 18 I 14 I 20 I 17 I

100 1 100 I 100 1 i:: 1 1027 1000 1022

- B 8 5 -

TABLEAU 88 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE E8 ( c o n t i n u e d )

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 100

N I 999 1006 1004 962

I DANMARK I I

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100

1328 1012 1049 1058 1007 1084

I I I I l I I I I I I I 1987 I I I I I I I I l I

1 O0

957 -

I % I %

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I l I I I I I I I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l I 20 I l I l I I I P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / I I I I I I I I Decreased i n g e n e r a l I 14 I I I I I I I A peu p r è s sans change- I I I I I I I I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same I 58 1 l I I I I I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I

I x - X I I I 1 x 1 % I

I I % I 2 1

l I I I I I I l l l I I

Sans réponse /No r e p l y I 7 I I I l l I I I I I T o t a l I 100

N I 1002

I DEUTSCHLAND

1 1977 I 1978 I 1981 1 1981 I 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1985 I 1986 1 I I x - X I I x - X I I I V 1 x - X I I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x - X I I 1 % 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I '

I I ( P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l l p l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / I D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l l ( A peu p r è s sans change- l \ment /Abou t t h e same IlSans r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I IN

~

I ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~

DEUTSCHLAND

I 1987 I I I I I I I I I I

I % I '

I % I

x- X I I .I I I I % , I % I

I % I

I % I

I % I % I % I % I

- B 8 6 -

1977 1978 1981

TABLEAU E8 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE E8 ( c o n t i n u e d )

I 1981 1982 I 1982 1983

I I I

: inoo inoo i i 9 9

I I J P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / ( I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l l p l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / I D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l I A p e u p r è s sans change- I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same ISans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N inoo i n n n i nno

x - X I I x - X I I I V 1 x - X I j I I I - ï v 1 x I I I I - I V % I % I % I % I % I % I %


: I : I 2 3 ) 2 7 ) 1 7 ) 2 7 1 22

: I : I 9 1 1 1 1 1 3 ) 9 1 7

: I : I 3 1 1 3 2 1 3 4 ) 3 2 1 31

i n n n inon

: I : I 3 7 1 3 0 1 3 6 1 3 2 1 40

1 O0

1 O00

1977

I I l

1983 I 1985 1 1986

1978 1981 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1985 1986

x I I I I - I V I x - X I 1 % I % [ : : I

100

1149

I I I

l l I

I I I

21 I 1 7 1 31 1

1 4 1 1 8 ) 6 )

34 I 33 1 38 I 31 I 32 I 25 I

1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

1194 991 1006 1199 939 1011 1002 1017 994

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l A peu p r è s sans change- m e n t / A b o u t t h e same Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l A peu p r è s sans change- m e n t / A b o u t t h e same Sans r 6 p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l \ N

'i

- 8 8 7 -

I I


I 1

I T o t a l I 1 0 0

1 998

IRELAND I

I x - X I I x - X I I I V I x - X I I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x - X I I 1 % 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I ' I 1977 I 1978 I 1 9 8 1 I 1981 I 1982 1 1982 I 1983 1 1983 I 1985 I 1986

T o t a l 1 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

N I 997 1005 1005 985 1 1 8 1 1007 987

1 O0 100 . l o o 1002 1009 1007

/ P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l [ P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / I O e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l ( A p e u p r è s s a n s change I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same [ S a n s r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I M

IRELAND

1 9 8 7 I I I I I I l I I I I

% I I

% I I

% I I

% I x - X I I I

% I % I I I I I I l I I I

33 I I I I l I I I I I I I l I l I l I l I I

I I I I I I I I I I

6 1 I I I I l I l I I

4 4 I I I I I I I I l I 17 I I I I I l I I I I,

1 - 1 % I % I

I % I

I % I

1 0 0

997

- 8 8 8 -

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

I 1155 1030 1183 1070 1301 1025 1031 1033

TABLEAU 88 [ s u i t e l / TABLE 88 ( c o n t i n u e d )

100 100

1127 1097

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 1 O0

I 344 291 300 500 399 300 300 304

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l A peu p r è s s a n s change- m e n t / A b o u t t h e same Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

100 100

300 301

1987 x - X I

%

25

5

50 20

- I

I T A L I A

I I I

%

l I I I I I

I % I I % I

I X I

I l I I I I I I I I l I I l I I I I

I LUXEMBOURG

I I ,1977 I 1978 I 1981 I 1981 1 1982 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1985 I 1986 i x - X I i x - X I i I V i x - X I i I I I - I V i x 1 I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x - X I I I X I % I X I X I X I X I % I % I % I % 1

- 6 8 9 -

I

TABLEAU 8 8 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE É8 ( c o n t i n u e d )

I I I I I j I 1 P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / 1 I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l [ P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / [ D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l I A p e u p r è s s a n s change- I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same / S a n s r d p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l 1 O0

302


T o t a l

N

1977 1978 1 9 8 1 1981 1982 1982 1983 1983 1985 1986

1 O0

9 4 3

1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0 100 1 0 0

9 1 3 1 0 9 1 1011 1228 1056 998 1050 985 1026

P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l A p e u p r è s s a n s change- m e n t / A b o u t t h e same Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

- 8 9 0 -

1977 1978 1 9 8 1 1981 1982 1982 1983


1983 1985 1986


T o t a l

N 1351 1403 1369 1395 1419 1335 1348

I I I I [ P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / ( I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l [ P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / t i l e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l ( A p e u p r è s sans change- I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same [Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I To t a l

I N

1277 1443 1318

I I I I I I [ P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l / P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / I D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l IA peu p r è s sans change- I m e n t / A b o u t t h e same ISans r é p o n s e / N o r t p l y

I T o t a l

I N

I 1 1 I

32

17

42

15 I 22 I 16 I 1 4 I 16 I 16 1 17 I 15 1 15

1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

8936 8788 9898 9911 11676 9689 9790 9725 9936

i I

I

27 I 1 1

17 I 5 1

43 I 30

1 4 1 100

, 9827

i I

I

15 I 11

34 I 39

42 I 42

I I

I

11 I 1 1

35 I 25

46 I 52

I I

I I

I I

13 I 17 I 13

23 1 17 I 15

56 I 57 I 62

C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 1 0 ) ( 1 ) I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e 1980 / I n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1980.

- B 9 0 b i s -

I

TABLEAU 88 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE BE ( c o n t i n u e d )

I

T o t a l I 1 0 0

N I 9566

ESPAlOA I I 1 I 1 I I r

1) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e 1980 / i n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1980.

T o t a l I 1 0 0

N 1 1010

1 O0

1016

I I 1 I I I I

T o t a l 1 100

N I 1000

1 O0

1000

- 8 9 1 -

100 100

11837 11583


P l u t ô t p r o g r e s s é / I n c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l P l u t ô t r é g r e s s é / D e c r e a s e d i n g e n e r a l A peu p r è s s a n s change- m e n t / A b o u t t h e same Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l / I n c l u d i n g P o r t u g a l and S p a i n .

T A B L E A U E9 / T A B L E E9

1 % 1 % % I

L A N O T O R I E T E DU P A R L E M E N T E U R O P E E N

% % % % % % %

A W A R E N E S S OF T H E E U R O P E A N P A R L I A M E N T

% P l I % % % % % % % %

I I ~~~ I

--__ I

I I B E L G I Q U E / B E L G I E I

- .-- - - -- ~- --__ -_ - D A N M A R K

l % l % % % % % % % % %

I D A N M A R K

I % / % % % % % % % % %

% P l % % % % % % % %

- 8 9 3 -

D E U T S C H L A N D

T A B L E A U 89 (suite) / T A B L E 89 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1985 1986 1986 1987 1987

% x - X I I I I I - I V I x - X I I I I I - I V I x - X I I I

% % % % % O I

I %

I %

I %

1985

49 i 39 i 39 i 46 i 36 i I I I I I

1986 1986 1987 1987

I I E L L A S I

% % % % % % % % % %

1977 1978 -1 9 7 9 1979 1982 1983 1983

45 I 37 I 40 1 36 1 40 I i i i

1984 1984 1985

i i

% % % % % % % % % %

I IV-v 1 x-XI 1 IV I x I x I III-IV I x I III-IV I x-XI IIII-IV/ % % % % % % % % %

F R A N C E I 1985 1986 1986 1987 1987 I

I %

i %

i %

i %

i x - X I i I I I - I V i x - X I I I I I - I V i x - X I i i 1 1 % % % % %

I I R E L A N D I I 1977 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 I 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 1

I I i I I _ I l l I I i


l % l %

I ’ IRELAND I

% % % % % % % %

% % P l I

I T A L I A

% % % % 1 ” % 1 %

I 1977 I l y 7 8 I 1979 I 1979 i 1982 1 1 9 8 3 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985

% % % F l I % % % % % %

1987 1987

I

I(*) I

% %

1 1977 I 1978 I 1979 I 1979 1 1982 I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 1 I I V - v I x - X I I I V I x I x I I I I - I V I x I I I I - I V I x - X I t I I I - I v l

% % % % %

% % % % % % % % %

% P l

I 1985 1 1986 I 1986

% % % % % % % %

i x - X I i I I I - I V i x - X I % %

LUXEMBOURG

66 i 60 i I I i i I.

- 8 9 5 -

1985 1986 1986


1987 1987

( * i . V o i r / s e e page 8 92

% % % % % % % % % %

1977 1978

50 I 44 I 40 I 40 I 32 I I I I I I

1979 1979 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985

% % % % % % % % % %

58 I 44 I 55 I 55 I 50 I 31 I 48 I 72 I 58 I 54 I

% Pl P l % % % % % % %

I ( * ) I

1977 1978 1979 1979 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985

%

I C O M M U N A U T E / COMMUNITY ( E U R 10) ( 1 ) I 1 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I 1987 I 1987 I I I

% % % % % % % % %

I %

i %

i %

i %

i x - X I I I I I - I V I x - X I i I I I - I V j x - X I i i % % % % % P l

1 1986 I 1986 I 1967 I 1987 I ~ I

I I I I I

I % / % % % % % % % % %

TABLEAU E9 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE E9 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % %

I PORTUGAL I

% % % % %

[ % I %

(*) V o i r / s e e page B 92

% % % % % %

(1, Y c o m p r i s l ’ E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l 2 p a r t i r de 1986 / I n c l u d i n g Spai-n and P o r t u g a l f r o m 1986. - .

- 8 9 7 -

1982 1983 1985 1985 1986 1986


1987

L'IMPRESSION QUE L'ON A SUR LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN DIAPRES CE QUE L'ON A LU OU ENTENDU

THE IMPRESSION PEOPLE HAVE ON THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FOLLOWING ON WHAT THEY H A V E READ OR HEARD

x 'I I I ? - I V I I I I - I V % % %

P l u t ô t bonne / r a t h e r good N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / n e i t h e r good n o r bad( 1 ) P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / r a t h e r bad Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

I %

I %

x - X I I I I I - I V I x - X I I x - X I 1 I . % % % % %

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

567 318 668 583 454 447 478 I

20 i 34 i 31 I 37 i 39 I 33 I 42 I 34 1 31 I 34 I 41 1 33 I 44 1 33 I

21 I 21 I 30 1 19 I 23 I 18 1 20 I

I I I I l l I

I I I l I I I I I I I I I I

% % % % % P l u t ô t bonne / P l % % % %

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

N I 416 323 610 566 6 74 382

P l u t ô t b o n n e / r a t h e r good N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / n e i t h e r good n o r bad( 1) P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / r a t h e r bad Sans r é p o n s e / no r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1 O0

604

1982 1983 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

24

28

29

%

19 -

% % % % % % % % %

70 3 - 1 O0

350

37 I 20 I 23 1 29

32 I 35 I 41 I 36

20 I 42 I 35 I 30

I I I

I l I I I I

100 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

555 508 405 450 342

22 I 32 I i I I I

40 I 40 1 I I I I

33 I 27 I I I I I

( 1 ) Réponse s p o n t a n é e d e s p e r s o n n e s i n t e r r o g é e s / V o l u n t e e r e d .

- 6 9 8 -

1982

TABLEAU B l 0 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l 0 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1 9 8 3 1 9 8 5 1985 1986 1986 1987

I P l u t ô t bonne / [ r a t h e r good / N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / [ n e i t h e r g o o d n o r bad( 1) / P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / Ir a t h e r bad I s a n s r é p o n s e / ( n o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

%

[ P l u t ô t bonne / ( r a t h e r good I N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / l n e i t h e r good n o r bad( 1) ( P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / Ir a t h e r bad (Sans r é p o n s e l

% % % % % % % % %

1 O0

5 7 3

FRANCE I

1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 T

3 7 3 5 3 4 4 5 1 3 6 7 400 4 0 1 I

% % % % % % % % x %

27 I 25 I 32 1 42

4 3 1 29 I 4 0 I 32

I 25 I 27 I 21 I 1 9

I I I

I I I I I l I I

l T o t a 1 I 1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 1 0 0

I N I 372 306 7 0 0 550 574 458 469

I I I

I l I 16 1 1 8 I 15 I

( P l u t ô t bonne / l r a t h e r good I N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / I n e i t h e r g o o d n o r bad( 1) ( P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / Ir a t h e r bad [Sans r é p o n s e / I n o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

1982 X %

29

25

3 3

1 3

1 O0

6 0 0

1983- I 1 9 8 5 III-IV i III-IV tlf

36 i 38

27 I 25

2 2 I 3 1

15 I 6

I

I

I

1985 x-x I

%

4 1

1 9

33

7

1 O0

539

IRELAND

1986 1 1986 III-IV i x-XI %If

5 4 I 4 1

1 9 I 25

2 1 I 27

I

I

I 6 1 7

1 0 0 I 100

1987 x-XI

%

6 2

1 8

17

3

100

392

I + - %

I[ 1) Réponse s p o n t a n é e des p e r s o n n e s i n t e r r o g é e s / v o l u n t e e r e d .

- B 9 9 -


% P l u t ô t bonne / P l % % % % % % % %

P l u t ô t bonne / r a t h e r good N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / n e i t h e r good n o r bad( 1 ) P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / r a t h e r bad Sans r é p o n s e / no r e p l y

/ T o t a l

I N

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

N I 537 514 765 721 667 562 477

P l u t ô t bonne / r a t h e r good N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / n e i t h e r good n o r bad( 1 ) P l u t ô t m a u v a i s e / r a t h e r bad Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

T o t a l

N

% % % % % % %

x I I I I - I V

23 I 15

25 I 19

42 I 61

I

I I

%

% % %

I I I - I V I x- X I

I

I

I

-T-p- 22 I 24

22 I 37

49 I 34

+i-t

1 O0 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

70 1 486 615 541 429 421

LUXEMBOURG

1 O0

326

1986 I 1986 1 1 y ; x;1

73-k

27 I 26 I

I

I

34 I 34

36 I 36

1987 I x - X I 1

27 I I

36 I I

34 I I

%I$

+ NEDERLAND

1982 I 1983 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I 1987 I

(1) Réponse s p o n t a n é e d e s personnes . i n t e r r o g é e s / v o l u n t e e r e d .

- 8 100 -

‘TABLEAU 810 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 810 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1983 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

P l u t ô t b o n n e / r a t h e r good N i bonne n i m a u v a i s e / n e i t h e r good n o r bad( 1) P l ù t ô t m a u v a i s e / r a t h e r bad Sans r é p o n s e l no r e p l y

T o t a l

l

N

%

1982 X %

1 8

16

59

7

% % % % % % % %

1 O0

661

1 0 0 1 0 0 100 100 1 O0 1 O0

415 I

783 599 517 426 516

1 x 1 % P l u t ô t bonne / % % % % % % % %

T o t a l I 100

N I 5252

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 T 3579 6067 5278 4754 4184 4186

(1 ) Réponse spon tanée des p e r s o n n e s i n t e r r o g é e s / v o l u n t e e r e d . ( 2 ) Moyenne p o n d é r é e / w e i g h t e d average .

P l u t ô t bonne / l % l % I % l % % % % % % %

T o t a l I 100

N I 559

1 O0 1 O0

432 539 T

- - 8 101 -

1"1 %


% % % % % % % %

I T o t a l I 100 100 100

I 565 450 545

% I P l u t Ô t bonne / P l

(1) Réponse spon tanée des p e r s o n n e s i n t e r r o g k e s l v o l u n t e e r e d . ( 2 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l .

% % % % % % % %

I T o t a l I 100 100 100

I 5877 5065 5272

I (.

I.

- B 102 -

I

TABLEAU B l l / TABLE B l l

, L'IMPORTANCE DU ROLE ACTUEL DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN DANS LA VIE DE LA C O M M U N A U T E EUROPEENNE ( 1 )

BELGIQUE / BELGIE

IMPORTANCE F O THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S PRESENT ROLE I N THE L I F E OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

% % % % % % % % %

r r è s i m p o r t a n t / / e r y i m p o r t a n t [ m p o r t a n t 'eu i m p o r t a n t / i o t i m p o r t a n t 'as i m p o r t a n t du t o u t / i o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l ;ans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

[ n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

1984 1984 - 1977 I V - v

% -

6 17

31

5 41

2.40 - -

1985 1983 I I I - I V

%

14 32

14

5 35

2.85

%

DAN M A R K

% % % %

i I 9 1 8 1 10

%

2.73 I I

2.87

1985 x - X I

% .

1 3 31

19

7 35

2.72 2.58 2.64

1986 I I I - I V

%

28 34

11

5 22

3.08 2.63

1 % % % % T rès i m p o r t a n t /

17 i 14 i i I I I

6 1 7 1 I

% % % % % %

Très i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t Pas i m p o r t a n t du t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e l n o r e p l y

I n d i c e / i n d e x (1)

%

'; I I

% % % % % % % % %

l T rès i m p o r t a n t /

' v e r y i m p o r t a n t ' I m p o r t a n t 1Peu i m p o r t a n t / 1 n o t i m p o r t a n t 'Pas i m p o r t a n t du t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

I I n d i c e / i n d e x (1) I

.

Très i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t

¡Pas i m p o r t a n t d u t o u t / ' n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l 'Sans reponse /no r e p l y

I I n d i c e / i n d e x (1)

2.96 2.67 2.86 2.72 2.86 3.01 3.02 3.03

- 8 103 -

TABLEAU Bl1 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 811 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1977 1983

ELLAS I

1984 1984

1977 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 1 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I 1987 I

% % % % % % % % %

2.36

5 1 9 1 6 1 7 28 I 45 I 38 1 41

2.77 2.61 2.59 2.74 2.85

FRANCE I

2.73 2.81

1985 I I I - I V

%

10 48

27

2 13

2.77

1977 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

% % % % % % % % % %

2.80 3.03 2.78 2.75 2.90 2.69 3.06 3.00 3.02

(1) C a l c u l é e n a f f e c t a n t r e s p e c t i v e m e n t des c o e f f i c i e n t s 4, 3, 2 e t 1 l e s d i f f é r e n t s codes de réponse ; non- réponses e x c l u e s du c a l c u l . Le p o i n t c e n t r a l c o r r e s p o n d donc au s c o r e 2.5. / C a l c u l a t e d by a p p l y i n g t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s 4 , 3, 2 and 1 r e s p e c t i v e l y t o t h e v a r i o u s answer codes; " d o n ' t know" a r e e x c l u d e d f rom t h e c a l c u l a t i o n . The m i d- p o i n t c o r r e s p o n d s t o 2.5.

I I I I I I I

- B 1 0 4 -

% %

TABLEAU 8 1 1 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l 1 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % T r è s i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t Pas i m p o r t a n t d u t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

P n d i c e / i n d e x ( 1 )

%

I T A L I A I

% % % % I % T 1977 I 1 9 8 3 I 1 9 8 4 I 1 9 8 4

2.80 2.87 2.65 2.81 2.80

__

1 9 8 5 I 1 9 8 5 I 1 9 8 6 I 1 9 8 6 I 1987 I T

2.77 2.86 2.73 2.80 T

1977 1 9 8 3 1 9 8 4 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

I I i i ' i I i i i I

% % % % % % % % % % T r è s i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t Pas i m p o r t a n t d u t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e l n o r e p l y

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 1 ) 2 .60 2.57 2.48 2.39 2.53 2.53 2.58 2.49 2.54 I I I I I I I I I I

( 1 ) V o i r p a g e / s e e page 8 103.

-B 105 -

%

TABLEAU 811 ( s u i t e l / TABLE 811 ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % % % % % T r è s i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t Pas i m p o r t a n t du t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e l n o r e p l y

I I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 1 )

18 I 16

2.73 2.73

T r è s i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t Pas i m p o r t a n t d u t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e l n o r e p l y

1 5 1 8 1 1 3 1 1 6 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 I 2.52 2.63 2.75 2.73 2.69 2.76 2.70

1 1 I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 1 ) II

1977 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

UNITED KINGDOM I

% % % % % % % % % %

24 I 17 I 19 I 9

2.49 2.69 2.55 2.58

( 1 ) V o i r p a g e / s e e page 8 103

( 2 ) Moyenne p o n d é r é e , y c o m p r i s l a G r è c e 3 p a r t i r de 1983 / W e i g h t e d a v e r a g e , i n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m 1983.

14 1 17 1 16 I 15 I 14 I I 2.67 2.63 2.71 2.63 2.68

1986 1986 1987 I

% % % % % % % % % % T r è s i m p o r t a n t / v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t

' P a s i m p o r t a n t d u t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e l n o r e p l y

3.12 3.10 3.17

-6 106 -

% % %

TABLEAU Bl l ( s u i t e ) / TABLE Bll ( c o n t i n u e d )

% % % % % % l T r è s i m p o r t a n t /

v e r y i m p o r t a n t I m p o r t a n t Peu i m p o r t a n t / n o t i m p o r t a n t Pas i m p o r t a n t du t o u t / n o t i m p o r t a n t a t a l l Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 1 ) 3.27 3.07

PORTUGAL I

3.22

T r è s i m p o r t a n t / [ % I % % % % % % % % %

21 i 15 i 22 i I i i i i i i 31 I 33 I 36 1 I I I I I I I

I I l I l l I I l i 4 1 s l S l I I I I I I l

I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 2 1 1 1 I l I I l I I

i i i -I- I i i i i i i_

1) V o i r / s e e p a g e 8 103

2 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l à p a r t i r de 1986 / I n c l u d i n g S p a i n and P o r t u g a l f r o m 1986.

- 8 107 -


% %

LE ROLE SOUHAITE POUR LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ( 1 )

THE R O L E DESIRED FOR THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

% % , % % % %

1984 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987

% R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t /

x , % % % % % % % -

% % % % % % % %

'Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y 1 33 I 2 1 1 2 1 I 20 I 25 l I I I I I ,

1985 1986 1986 1987

% % R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t /

% % % % %

I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 1 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I I V I x 1%

R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / more i m p o r t a n t r o l e I 48 I 50 Même r i i l e l s a m e r o l e ( 2 ) I 16 1 16

l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e I 6 I 12 Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y I 30 I 22

R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / I I

53 2 1

56 1 54 I 57 22 I 20 I 22

l . I 1 1 I 10 I 6 11 I 16 I 15

48 I 52 I 47 1 I

4 1 8 1 7

26 1 26 I 29

I I 26 I 14 1 17

10 16

i I . I i I I

I 1983 '1 1983 1 1984 I I V I x I I I I - I V

more i m p o r t a n t r o l e I 17 I 19 Même rÔ le / same r o l e ( 2 ) I 29 I 30

l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e 1 16 1 22 Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y 1 38 I 29

R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / I I

15 26

16 i. 12 34 I 26

20 I 23 I

13 24

13 1 13 i 16 32 I 30 I 3 1

I I 27 I 17 I 25 19

40 26

30 I 39 1 37 I 28 I 4 0 I 28 I I I I I I I I I

DEUTSCHLAND

R â l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / 'mo re i m p o r t a n t r o l e Même rÔ le / same , r o l e ( 2 ) R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

44 20

55 i 49 18 J 2 0

I

5 1 16

10 I 12 I 11 I 14 26 I 15 I 20 I . 19

i i i I I I

ELLAS

I I 1983 I 1983 I 1984 1 1984 1 1985 I I V I x I I I I - I V I x - X I I I I I - I V I

61 more i m p o r t a n t r o l e I 58 i 70 Même rÔ le / same r o l e ( 2 ) I 6 I 5 R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / I I l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e I 3 1 4

. 65 10

61 I 60 11 I 8

8 1 7 I

50 12

56 1 59 I 56 9 I 12 I 14

I I 5 1 6 1 5

30 I 23 I 25 8

30 4

( 1 ) Pou r chaque sondage e t chaque p a y s a i n s i que p o u r l ' e n s e m b l e de l a Communauté,' l e t o t a l des p o u r c e n t a g e s e s t é g a l à 100 / F o r e a c h c o u n t r y as w e l l as f o r t h e who le Communi ty , t h e t o t a l p e r c e n t a g e s e q u a l s 100.

( 2 ) Réponse s p o n t a n é e / v o l u n t e e r e d .

- El 108 -

1983

TABLEAU B l 2 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE El12 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

1 9 8 4 1984 1985 1985 1986

IRÔle p l u s i m p o r t a n t / / m o r e i m p o r t a n t r o l e (Même rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) ! R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / ( l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e [Sans r é p o n s e l n o r e p l y I

%

[ R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / [more i m p o r t a n t r o l e (Même rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) ( R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / ( l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e I s a n s r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y I

% % % % %

1983 IV %

55 16

3 26

% % %

1983

6 0 1 5 4 I 65 1 4 1 1 8 I 1 4

I I 5 1 4 1 4

2 1 I 24 I 17

1 9 8 3 1 9 8 4 1 9 8 4 1985 1985 1986 1986 1 9 8 7

69 I 6 3 I 6 1 24 I 1 8 I 17

I I 3 1 5 1 4 4 1 1 4 I 1 8

% % % % % % % % % %

% R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / more i m p o r t a n t r o l e Même rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e Sans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

% % %

1983

I I I I

1983 1 9 8 4 1 9 8 4 1985 1985 1986 1986 1 9 8 7

R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / more i m p o r t a n t r o l e Même rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e Sans. r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

%

) ( 2 ) V o i r / s e e page B 107.

% % % % % % % % %

I I I I I

- 8 109 -

1983 1983 1984 1984 1985

TABLEAU 812 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 812 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

1985 1986 1986 1987 I I l R Ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / l m o r e i m p o r t a n t r o l e IMtme r a l e / s a m e r o l e ( 2 ) ( R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / [ l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e [ S a n s r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y I

% % % % % %

I [ R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / l m o r e i m p o r t a n t r o l e /Même rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) [ R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / ( l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e [ S a n s r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y I

% % % %

% % % % %

58 I 56 i 56 i 63 i 54 20 I 18 I 2 1 I 16 I 19

8 1 1 0 1 8 1 7 1 10 1 4 I 16 I 15 1 14 I 17

I I I I

% % % % % % %

59 i 57 i 53 i 48 i 16 I 2 1 I 24 I 23 I

% %

i I i i 9 1 9 1 9 1 9 1

16 I 13 I 14 I 20 I

% 1 % % . % % R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t /

i i i i i i i I i i

% % % % %

U N I T E D K I N G D O M

1983 I 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985

34 i 48 i 34 i 43 i 40 2 0 I 17 I 23 I 19 I 19

i i I I 2 7 I 20 I 24 I 24 I 23 19 I 15 I 19 I 14 I 19

1985 I 1986 x-XI I III-IV

39 i 33 15 1- 19

I 3 1 I 29 15 I 19

1986 I 1987 x-XI I x-XI $)%

41 I 36 24 I 24

1 9 I 24 16 I 16

I

T f l I

I l I I I I

II I COMMUNAUJE / COMMUNITY (EUR 10) ( 3 ) I li ¡ 1983 ¡ 1983 I 1984 I 1984 I 1985 I 1985 I 1986 I 1986 I 1987 1 t / ( m o r e i m p o r t a n t r o l e I 52 I 59 I 50 I 60 I 56 1 56 I 53 I 53 I 51 I I IIMdme rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) I 16 I 13 I 17 I 16 I 18 I 15 I 16 I 20 I 20 I I I IRÔle m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / I I I I I I I I I I I I l l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e 1 10 I 10 I 10 I 10 I 10 I 12 I 12 I 9 I 11 I I I lSans r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y I 22 I 18 I 23 I 14 I 16 I 17 I 19 I 18 I 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I

- 8 110 -

1986 1986

TABLEAU 812 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l 2 ( c o n t i n u e d ) (1 )

1987

R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / . n o r e i m p o r t a n t r o l e Même r ô l e / s a m e r o l e ( 2 ) R ô l e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e Sans r é p o n k e / n o r e p l y

%

I J R ô l e p l u s i m p o r t a n t / /more i m p o r t a n t r o l e /,Même rÔ le /same r o l e ( 2 ) I!R81e m o i n s i m p o r t a n t / I l e s s i m p o r t a n t r o l e I s a n s r é p o n s e / n o r e p l y

% % % % % % % % %

% % f

! C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 12) ( 3 )

% % % % % % %

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r / s e e page B 107. ( 3 ) Y c o m p r i s l ’ E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l à p a r t i r de 1986 / i n c l u d i n g P o r t u g a l and S p a i n f r o m 1986.

~~

- 8 111 -

1980 1981 1982

TABLEAU 813 / TABLE B l 3

1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 I

L'ANNEE PROCHAINE : MEILLEURE OU M O I N S BONNE / THE N E X T Y E A R : B E T T E R OR WORSE ( 1 )

100 100 100

1022 973 1020

En c e q u i vous concerne , pensez- vous que l ' a n n é e p r o c h a i n e (...) s e r a m e i l l e u r e ou mo ins bonne que l ' a n n é e q u i s ' a c h è v e ? / So f a r as you a r e concerned , do you t h i n k t h a t t h e n e x t y e a r (...) w i l l be b e t t e r o r worse t h a n t h e y e a r u h i c h i s e n d i n g ?

100 100 100 100 100

995 1035 1011 999 1005

M e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r Mo ins bonne / Worse Sans changement / Same Sans r é p o n s e / No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

1980 1981

[ M e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r / M o i n s bonne / Worse /Sans changement / Same I s a n s r é p o n s e / N O r e p l y

I T o t a l

1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

I N 1024 995 1000 990 995 997 1002

% X I i X X I i x i x i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i I i

100 100 100 100 100 100

1 O08 962 1012 1058 1053 1028

100 100

1084 957

1 DANMARK I

I % I

x- X I I x - X I 1 x I x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x- X I I I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I 14 I : 1 14 I 27 30 I 32 1 ' 25 1 26 1 4 2 1 : I 4 7 1 1 9 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 1 3 7 ) : I 3 1 1 4 7 1 4 7 1 5 1 1 4 7 1 4 5 1

i i I I I I

7 1 : I 8 1 7 1 6 1 6 1 7 1 5 1 I I

I OE UTSCHL A N O I i

I l l e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r ( U o i n s bonne / Worse )Sans changement / Same I s a n s rbponsc / NO r e p l y

I T o t a l

IN

I

I X I I % I % I % I % I % I X I X I X I % I

37 I 28 I 22 I 17 I 12 I 11 I 10 I 11 I I I 48 I 50 I 53 1 51 I 58 I 56 I 52 I 56 I I I

8 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 0 1 2 5 1 2 7 1 2 9 1 2 6 1 I I

( 1 ) The G a l l u p I n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n .

- B 112 -

1000

TABLEAU B l 3 [ s u i t e ) / TABLE E13 ( c o n t i n u e d l

1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

II Y I M e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r I M o i n s bonne / Worse [Sans changement / Same ~ l s a n s r é p o n s e / N O r e p l y

1 T o t a l

1980

I N

1 9 8 1 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 I II I M e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r I M o i n s bonne / Worse [Sans changement / Same [ S a n s r é p o n s e / N O r e p l y

I T o t a l 1 O0

986 I N

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 0 0 100

1006 939 1000 1006 1006 994 998

.__ -

I ELLAS

1 9 8 0 I 1 9 8 1 1 1982 1 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 I

1 T o t a l I 100

1 1010

I % I x - X I I x - X I I x I x 1 x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

985 1007 1002 1008 1008 1007 997

3 9 I 72 I 5 9 I 50 I 53 I 26 I 36 I 32 I 3 9 1 6 1 1 8 1 2 7 1 2 1 ) 4 5 1 3 7 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 9 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 9 1 1 7 ) 2 3 1

" 9 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 8 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 I I

I T o t a l I 1 0 0 I 1108

1 0 0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

1070 1025 1033 1097 1047 1097 1031

i IRELAND

I I T A L I A I 1 1980 1 1 9 8 1 1 1982 1 1983 I 1 9 8 4 I 1985 1 ' 1 9 8 6 I 1987 I I I

I % I

I x - X I I x - X I I x I x 1 x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I 1 % 1 X I % I % I % I % I % I X I % I

- B 113 -

300 500 300 304 299

TABLEAU Bl3 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE Bl3 ( c o n t i n u e d )

300 301 302

I M e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r I M o i n s bonne / Worse I S a n s changement / Same I s a n s r é p o n s e / NO r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

I 100 I 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

LUXEMBOURG 1

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

1980 I 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 1 I l I

% I x - X I I x - X I I x 1 x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I 1 x - X I I I

% I % I % I % I . % I % I % I % I % I 141 1 1 1 8 1 1 8 1 261 3 5 1 3 3 1 321 45 I 51 I 56 I 30 I 23 I 16 I 13 I 13 I 37 I 37 I 33 I 50 I 48 I 45 I 50 I 52 I 4 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 ’ 4 1 3 1 I I

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

I NEDERLAND I I

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0

N I 1432 1395 1335

M e i l l e u r e / B e t t e r M o i n s bonne / Worse Sans changement / Same Sans r é p o n s e / No r e p l y

T o t a l

N

100 1 O0 100 100 1 O0

1277 1405 1383 1313 1308

I I % I

I x - X I I x - X I I x I x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % ’ I

13 I 15 I 16 I 18 I 26 I 33 I 31 I 25 I I I 49 I 41 I 49 I 46 I 28 I 16 1 20 I 21 I l I 34 I 40 I 30 I 33 I 41 I 46 1 43 1 47 I l I

I 1980 I 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 1 1985 1 1986 I 1987 I l

I T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0

I N )1OOO4 9911 9689

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100

9725 9909 9846 9827 9566

I 1114 I 1011 I 1056 1 1050 I 1018 I 1068 1 1026 I 965 I I I

i I

i % I 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

j x - X I j x- X I i x i x i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I j x - X I i I

- B 114 -

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

T o t a l I 1 O0 1 O0 100 100 100 100

1015 1001 1000 1035 1003 1010

100

1016

(1) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l . / I n c l u d i n g S p a i n a n d P o r t u g a l .

T o t a l I 100 1 O0 1 O0 1 O0 100 100

N I 1965 1853 1998 1000 1000 1000

T o t a l 1 100 1 O0

N (11849 11837

1 O0

11583

- 8 115 -

TABLEAU Bl4 / TABLE 14

I Tot a l I 100 100 100

I 1022 973 1020

C E QUE L'ON ATTEND DE L'ANNEE PROCHAINE / THE E X P E C T A T I O N S FOR THE N E X T Y E A R ( 1 )

100 100 100 100 1 O0

995 1035 1011 999 1005

Quand vous pensez 2 ( l ' a n n é e p r o c h a i n e ) , c r o y e z- v o u s que l e s g r è v e s e t c o n f l i t s s o c i a u x (dans v o t r e p a y s ) ... / L o o k i n g ahead t o ( n e x t y e a r ) do y o u t h i n k t h a t s t r i k e s and i n d u s t r i a l d i s p u t e s ( i n t h i s c o u n t r y ) . . . .

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100

N I 1024 995 1000 990

I l BELGIQUE / BELGIE

I 1980 I 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 I

100 1 O0 1 O0

995 997 1002

i x - X I i x - X I i x j x i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i i 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % [

T o t a l I 100 100

N I 1008 962

100 100 100 100 100 100

1012 1058 1053 1028 1084 957 I I

I D A N M A R K I I i I l I

I l I I I I

i 1980 I 1981 1 1982 I 1983 1 1984 1 1985 1 1986 1 1987 I I x - X I I x - X I I x I x 1 x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I 1 % 1 % I % I % I 4 1 % I % I % I % I '

DEUTSCHLAND

I 1980 I 1981 1 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 1 1986 I 1987 1 I I x - X I I x - X I I x 1 x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I / % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I 2 1


- 8 116 -

T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

N I 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000


I T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 I 100 100 100 100

I 986 1006 939 1000 I 1006 1006 994 998

I ELLAS I I 1980 I 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 I

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

I I I

T o t a l I 100

I FRANCE I

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

I 1980 I 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 I I

N I 1108 1070 1025 1033 1097 1047

i X-XI i X-XI i x i x i X-XI i X-XI i X-XI i X-XI i i 1 x 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I ‘

1097 1031 -

I . . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ? l . . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l dec rease ? I . . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ? I / w i l l r e m a i n t h e same ? (Sans réponse/No r e p l y I I T o t a l

I N

l I I T A L I A i

- B 117 -

TABLEAU 814 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE Bl4 ( c o n t i n u e d )

LUXEMBOURG I , 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 i

I

I 300 500 300 304 299

i . . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ? 1 25 I . . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l d e c r e a s e ? I 5 [ . . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ? 1 I / w i l l r e m a i n t h e same ? I 63

300 301 302

29 I 43 I 29 I 25 I 26 5 1 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 9

I I I I 63 I 51 I '62 I 57 I 59

I T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

28 I 30 8 1 8

I 63 I 57

100

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

1114 1011 1056 1050 1018 1068 1026 965

i . . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ? I . . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l dec rease ? ( . . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ? I / w i l l r e m a i n t h e same ? ISans réponse /No r e p l y

I Tot a l

1395 I 1335 I 1277

I N

I

1405 1383

. . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ?

. . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l d e c r e a s e ?

. . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ?

Sans réponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

/ w i l l r e m a i n t h e same ?

100 100

10004 9911

I I I I I . . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ? I . . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l dec rease ? ( . . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ? I / w i l l r e m a i n t h e same ? ISans réponse /No r e p l y

I Tot a l 100 100 100 100 100 100

9689 9725 9909 9846 9827 9566 I N

I NEDERLAND

1980 I 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 1 1987 I I x - X I I x - X I I x I x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I

% I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

1980 x - X I

%

38 26

32 4

1 O0

1432

UNITE0 KINGDOM

1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 x - X I I x I x I x - X I I x - X I

% I % I % I % I %

I I I I

42 I 39 I 32 1 41 I 36 19 I 19 I 23 I 20 I 24

33 I 37 I 42 I 33 I 35 6 1 5 1 3 1 6 1 5

100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100

1986 I 1987 x - X I I x - X I

% I %

22 I 23 21 I 25

51 I 49 I

-+-I+ C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 10) ( 1 ) I

1980 1 1981 I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 1 1985 1 1986 1- 1 i 8 7 - 1

- * - * - /

x - X I j x - X I j x i x j x - X I j x - X I j x - X I j x - X I j i % I % I % I % I % I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e 1980. / I n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1980.

- B 118 -

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986


1987

, . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ? , . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l d e c r e a s e ? . . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ?

j a n s rCponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

u


1982

1 . . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ? 1. . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l d e c r e a s e ? a . . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ?, I / w i l l r e m a i n t h e same ? ISans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

1983

1 T o t a l

I N

1 O0

. . a u g m e n t e r o n t / w i l l i n c r e a s e ?

. . d i m i n u e r o n t / w i l l d e c r e a s e ?

. . r e s t e r o n t au n i v e a u a c t u e l ?


T o t a l


N

100 100

1853 1998

1 O0 1 O0 1 O0

11849 11837 11583

I I I I . I 24 I 28 I 23 I 23

I

I l I I I

32 I 33 I 39 1 I

l 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 1 1015 1 1001 I 1000 I 1035 1 1003 1 1010 1 1016 I I

1980 x-XI

%

18 17

12 53

1 O0

1965

POR T U G A L

%

1985 x-XI'

%

26 20

26 28

1 O0

1 O00

1986 x-XI

%

26 23

35 16

1 O0

1 O00

39 I I

30 I e-ì- 7

C O M M U N A U T E / C O M M U N I T Y (EUR 12) ( 1 ) I

36 I 34 I 34 1 I I I I I I 17 I 15 I 15 I I

I I I I 39 I 43 I 44 I I


( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l . / I n c l u d h g S p a i n and P o r t u g a l . . .

- B 119 -

1980 1981


1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

CE QUE L'ON ATTEND DE L'ANNEE PROCHAINE / T H E E X P E C T A T I O N S FOR THE NEXT Y E A R ( 1 )

Quand vous p e n s e z à ( l ' a n n é e p r o c h a i n e ) , c r o y e z- v o u s que c e s e r a une année a s s e z t r a n q u i l l e e t s a n s beaucoup de c o n f l i t s i n t e r n a t i o n a u x , ou une année a g i t é e avec beaucoup de q u e r e l l e s i n t e r n a t i o n a l e s , OU

comme m a i n t e n a n t ? / L o o k i n g ahead t h e ( n e x t y e a r ) , d o y o u t h i n k i t w i l l be a p e a c e f u l y e a r more o r l e s s f r e e o f i n t e r n a t i o n a l d i s p u t e s , a t r o u b l e d y e a r w i t h much i n t e r n a t i o n a l d i s c o r d , or r e m a i n t h e same ?

1024

I A s s e r t r a n q u i l l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r I A g i t é e / T r o u b l e d y e a r I Comme m a i n t e n a n t / IRema in t h e same ]Sans r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

995 1000 990 995

1 T o t a l

I N

1980

i 1 .

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

¡ A s s e r t r a n q u i l l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r I A g i t é e / T r o u b l e d y e a r I Comme m a i n t e n a n t / IRema in t h e same [ S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1008

T o t a l

I N

962 1012 1058 1053 1028 1084 957

( A s s e z t r a n q u i l l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r I A g i t é e l T r o u b l e d y e a r JComme m a i n t e n a n t / IRema in t h e same / S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I N

x - X I I x - X I I x I x 1 x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I % I '

55 1 61 i 52 i 51 i 44 i 35

32 I 26 I 31 I 37 1 43 I 50 9 1 9 1 1 1 1 8 1 5 1 6

I I l l I 38 I 38 1

I I 45 I 44 I

7 1 9 1

100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I 100 I I I 1022 I 973 I 1020 1 995 1 1035 I 1011 I 999 I 1005 I I

DANMARK

1980 I 1981 1 1982 I 1983 I 1984 1 1985 x - X I j x - X I i x i x j x - X I i x - X I

% I % I % I % I % I %

I I I I I 32 I : I 32 I 33 I 48 I 48

9 1 : I 6 1 8 1 8 1 10

36 I 42 I I l I I

46 I 42 I I 1 0 1 4 1 I

100 1 ' 100 1 997 I 1002 I I

x - X I I x - X I I x I x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I '

6 1 1 0 1 ' 5 1 8 1 1 8 ) 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 5 1 55 1 54 I 51 I 48 I 26 I 29 I . 27 1 36 I


- B 120 -

I TABLEAU 815 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 815 ( c o n t i n u e d )

ELLAS

. .

I Tot a l I 100

1 1000

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

l I FRANCE

I 1980 1 1981 1 1982 1 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 1 1987 I

1 T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100

I 986 1006 939 1000 1006

I x - X I I x - X I I x I x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I I I I % ] % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

100 100 100

1006 994 998

1 T o t a l I 100

I 1010

IRELAND I

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

985 1007 1002 1008 1008 1007 997

1 1980 1 1981 1 1982 1 1983 I 1984 1 1985 I 1986 I 1987 1 t

l T o t a 1 1 100 100

I N I 1108 1070

I x - X I 1 x - X I I x I x I x - X I 1 x - X I I x - X I 1 x - X I I I 1 % 1 % I $ 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I

100 100 100 100 100 100

1025 1033 1097 1047 1097 1031

- B 121 -

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984

TABLEAU B l 5 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 8 1 5 ( c o n t i n u e d )

1985 1986 1987

i Assez t r a n q u i 1 l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r I A g i t é e l T r o u b l e d y e a r lcomme m a i n t e n a n t / [ R e m a i n t h e same I S a n s r é p o n s e / No r e p l y

) T v t a l 100

300

1 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100

500 300 304 299 300 301 302

x - X I j x - X I j x j x j x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i % I % I % I % I % I % I %

I T o t a l I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

IN. I 1114 1011 1056

l I U N I T E D KINGDOM I 1 1980 I 1981 I 1982 1 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 I

1050 1018 1068 1026 965

i x - X I i x - X I i x i x j x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i x - X I i I 1 % 1 % I % I % I % I % I % I % I % I

I 100 I 1 0 0

1 Assez t r a n q u i l l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r I A g i t é e / T r o u b l e d y e a r I Comme m a i n t e n a n t / I R e m a i n t h e same [ S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1 T o t a l 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

I N

I T o t a l I 100

I N )1O004

1 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 1 O0

9911 9689 9725 9909 9846 9827 9566

I 1432 I 1395 I 1335 I 1277 I 1405 1 1383 1 1318 I 1308 1 I

- B 122 -

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986


1987

T o t a l I 1 O0 100 100 1 O0

N I 1015 1001 1000 1035

1 O0 100 1 O0

1003 1010 1016

i I 1 Assez t r a n q u i l l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r l A g i t é e / T r o u b l e d y e a r I Comme m a i n t e n a n t / / R e m a i n t h e same [ S a n s r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

1980 1982 1983 1985 1986

¡ N

1987

I I I A s s e z t r a n q u i l l e / P e a c e f u l y e a r I A g i t k e l T r o u b l e d y e a r I Comme m a i n t e nan t / [ R e m a i n t h e same [ S a n s r k p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

1985 1986 1987

¡ N

I

I '.

1 O0

11849

1 O0 1 O0

11837 11583

29 I i 31 i 45 i i 35 i 29 i 21 i i l l I I I 1 24 1 28 I 29 I I

I I I I 13 ' 1 I 18 I 18 I 46 I I 42 I 31 I I 1 9 1 1 1 1 9 1 I

100 I 1 100 I 100 I 1 100 1 100 I 100 I I 1965 I 1 1853 1 1998 1 1 1000 1 1000 I 1000 I I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l . / I n c l u d i n g S p a i n and P o r t u g a l .

- B 123 -

T A B L E A U 816 / T A B L E Bl6

100.0

3.23

1020

L E O A N b E R D ' U N E N O U V E L L E G U E R R E M O N D I A L E A U C O U R S D E S D I X P R O C H A I N E S A N N E E S /

100.0 100.0

2.78 2.80

995 1035

R I S K OF A NEW W O R L D WAR I N T H E N E X T T E N Y E A R S

100.0

2.10

1011

V o i c i une s o r t e d ' é c h e l l e ( M O N T R E R C A R T E ) . Vou lez- vous me m o n t r e r à q u e l e n d r o i t , s u r c e t t e é c h e l l e , vous p l a c e z l e danger qu 'une n o u v e l l e g u e r r e m o n d i a l e se p r o d u i s e dans l e s d i x p r o c h a i n e s années ? Here i s a s o r t o f s c a l e ( S H O W C A R O ) . Would you, w i t h t h e h e l p o f t h i s c a r d , t e l l me how you assess t h e chance o f a w o r l d war b r e a k i n g o u t i n t h e n e x t 10 y e a r s ?

T'

100.0 100.0

2.63 3.00

999 1005

i ( ~ a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / / W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e l n e x t t e n y e a r s 100 I I I I I I I I I / N o danger o f n a r O

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

IAucun danger de g u e r r e /

(Sans rCponse/No r e p l y

1:,::: moyen/nean s c o r e

I N

I V I I I x - X I

% I %

I I

1971 I 1977

2 I 3.3 O I 1.7 1 I 3.8 1 I 4.0

8 I 11.5 4 I 5.0 8 I 7.4 8 I 7.9

3 I 4.7

1 1 1 9.4 I

40 I 26.9 14 I 14.5 x

J-L-

I 1980 I 1981

I V i x - X I % I %

i I

4.5 I 3.6 3.9 1 3.2 8.0 I 5.9 5.6 I 7.0 6.0 I 6.9 13.5 I 12.9 6.0 I 6.3 7.1 I 7.0 8.0 I 6.2 7.1 I 6.5

14.1 I 17.5 16.1 I 17.0

I

Zz-T-ET -- B E L G I Q U E / B E L G I E

I I 1982 I 1983 I 1984

x i x i x - X I X I % I %

- 8 124 -

% I %


%

DANMARK

t a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 100

9 0 8 0 70 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 20 10

Aucun d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y No d a n g e r o f war O

I T o t a l

' S c o r e moyen/Mean S c o r e

I N

I l I L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / [ W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e l n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0

I I I I I I I I ]No d a n g e r o f war O

9 0 8 0 70 6 0 5 0 4 0

I 3 0 20 10

I A u c u n d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

ISans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

1 T o t a l

' I s c o r e moyen/Mean s c o r e I I N

1971 V I I

%

-

1977 1 1980 I 1981

I I

3.2 1 2 .7 0.5 I 2.3 1.5 _I 3.6 1.4 1 3.0 2.2 I 2.6 9.5 1 14.9 1.3 I 4.1

5.7 I 5.2 4.7 I 5.7

7.4 I 9.1

I 47.9 I 26.3 14.6 I 20.5

G J l T

992 I 9 9 4

1 9 8 2 1 1983 X I X % I %

I I

1.7 I 2.1 0.9 I 0.6 1.0 1 2.5 2.8 I 3.1 2.4 I 4.3

14.5 I 14.7 6.3 I 6.2 6.9 I 7.7 7.7 I 8.4

14.1 I 13.6

26.5 I 13.6 15.3 I 13.1

I

zJ%T x 995 I 1000

1 9 8 4 x - X I

%

0.8 O. 6 6.0 1.6 2.7

12.8 4.4 8.0

10.3 13.6

30.5 8.6

100.0

2.50

9 9 0

1985 1 1986 x - X I i x - X I

% I %

I I

0.6 I 0.9 0.5 1 0.8

2.5 I 1.4 f .2 I 1.5

10.8 I 8.9 3.8 I 4.2 8.2 I 8.1

14.8 I 15.0

35.5 1 38.4 13.0 I 10.0

1.3 I 0.5

7.7 1 10.2

I

ii-lTKJ -K lTT

995 I 997

1987 x - X I

%

0.8 O. 5 1.3 1.4 2.0

10.3 4.6 9.8

14.7 15.9

32.2 6.5

100.0

2.03

1002

1971 V I I

%

O. 6 O. 7 1.8 2.6 4.6

11.0 7.2

11.9 10.6 11.0

30.4 8.0

100.0

2.44

2000

1977 I 1980 x - X I I I V

% I %

i I

1.1 I 1.3 1.8 I 2.7

2.3 I 5.6 3.8 1 4.7 3.1 I 7.6

8.0 I 9.4 11.5 I 11.5 15 .1 I 8.9 14.9 I 8.1

21 .0 I 13.8 8.0 I 13.6

9.3 I 12.9

I

iJ--K TJ-E

1981 x - X I

%

4.4 1.6 6.4 9.3 7.3

12.5 6.6 9.6

10.5 8.1

12.7 11.0

100.0

4.11

962

DE UTSCHLAND

X I X % I %

i I '

2.6 I 2.5 2.5 I 1.2 2.5 1 3.4 3.8 I 4.0

11.5 I 11.4. 6.7 I 8.4

11.4 I 9.0 8.9 I 8.6 8.1 I 10.4

20.7 I 25.2 16.7 I 10.6

4.7 I 5.3

I

KJiz- -GJTF9

1984 x - X I

%

1.8 1.0 1.4 4.7 3.7 9.6 5.2 9.9

12.3 . 9.8

31.0 9.5

100.0

2.50

1053

1985 I 1986 x - X I I x - X I

% I %

i 2.6 I 1.8 0.2 1 0.6

2.8 I 2.4

9.3 I 7.8 7.0 I 4.3 9.8 I 8.8

12.4 I 9.0 11.8 I 11.7

-28 .9 I 33.8 9.9 I 14.2

1.7 I 1.3

3.5 I 4.3

I

1028 I 1084

1987 x - X I

%

1 .2 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.9 7.1 6.4

11.1 13.2 12.7

30.3 10.7

.oo.o 2.21

957

- B 125 -

100.0

4.85

9 9 3

t a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

/ A u c u n d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

/ S a n s r é p o n s e l N o r e p l y

/i:::: moyen/Mean s c o r e I

I I I I I l I N o d a n g e r o f war O

100.0 100.0

3.04 3.47

1006 939

I N

L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / W o r l d u a r w i t h i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0

90 8 0 70 60 50 40 30 20 1 0

Aucun d a n g e r de g u e r r e / N o d a n g e r o f n a r Sans rCponse /No r e p l y

Total

S c o r e noyen/Mean s c o r e

N


ELLAS

1971 1 1977 I 1980 V I I I x - X I I I V

% % I % x - X I 1 x

% I %

I I

1.2 I 1.8

1.8 I 1.2 0.3 I 1.1

2.2 I 1.7 1.4 I 2.0 6.6 I 5.9

7.2 I 7.6 6.1 I 6.9

12.6 I 11.2

45.9 I 40.9 11.3 I 15.8

3.4 I 3.9

I

GJ-iz-

x I x - X I % I %

I, 1.8 I 2.5 1.2 I 0.5 2.4 I 2.3 1.8 I 2.3 3.2 I 2.0

6.8 1 3.4

8.5 I 6.2

8.7 I 9.1

8.2 I 7.7

11.2 I 11.9 I

9.8 I 7.4 36.4 1 44.7

Zz-lTE

FRANCE

x - X I I x - X I % I %

I I

1.1 I 2.2

7.3 I 8.3

8.3 I 9.9 9.9 I 12.2

I 48.5 I 39.4

1.4 I 1.6 0.4 I 0.7

1.4 1 1.9 1.8 I 3.1

3.1 I 5.6 6.3 I 7.6

10.5 I 7.5

KJ-GK TJ-L

1987 x - X I

%

1.4 O. 8 3.2 3.3 2.5 7.5 4.0 6.6

11.7 10.7

36.0 12.3

! O O . O

2 - 1 9

1 O00

V 1 ! I x - X I - T v

I I

2 I 2.3

3 I 3.3 2 1 2.1

4 I 4.7

1 1 1.7

2 I 3.0 13 1 14.2

8 I 9.4 8 I 7.6

1 0 I 11.6

32 I 28.1 15 I 11.9

I

GJXT G-T-E-

x I x - X I % I %

I I

4.4 1 2.4 2.6 I 0.8 5.0 I 2.7 5.5 I 3.8 5.4 1 2.7

18.6 I 19.1 7.1 I 6.4 8.7 I 10.9

11.8 I 11.1 10.4 I 13.7

17.6 I 24.7 2.8 I 1 .7

I

ZJTZ TJ-z

1985 x - X I

%

1.4 O. 6 2.1 2.7 4.0

15.4 4.9

10.4 12.6 14.7

30.7 0.5

100.0

2.49

1006

1986 x - X I

%

1.4 1.2 1.7 3.8 3.1

13.1 7.7

12.7 12.3 16.8

25.1 1.2

100.0

2.61

9 9 4

x - X I 1 T

1 1

1.5 1 1.2 I 2.5 3.6 3.9

13.5 5.9

11.5 12.4 15.7

27.2 1.2

OO. o 2.63

I98

- - - -

- 8 126 -

1983


1984 1985

I

I I

100.0

3.98

1116

I L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / I W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e l n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0 I I I I I I I I I INo d a n g e r o f war O

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

[ A u c u n d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

[ S a n s r & p o n s e / N o r e p l y

~~~~~~ moyen/Mean s c o r e

I N

100.0 100.0

3.11 2.68

1070 1025

I I I L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / I W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e ] n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0 I I I I I

I I I ( N N O d a n g e r o f war O

90 80 70 60 50

I 40 30 20 10

[ A u c u n d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

[Sans r é p o n s e / N o r e p l y

I T o t a l

I S c o r e noyen/Mean s c o r e

I N

100.0

3.03

1033

1971 V I I

%

100.0 100.0

2.37 2.20

1097 1047

1977 I 1980 x - X I I I V % I 2

I I

2.6 I 4.0 1.8 1 4.4 2.8 I 7.0 2.2 I 7.4 3.3 I 5.3

5.7 I 7.5 10.7 I 15.1

4.9 I 6.7 6.7 I 8.5 7.9 I 7.6

46.1 I 16.3 5.1 I 10.1

I

TJ-K 997 I 1008

1981 x - X I -

%

5.9 3.5 5.3 6.3 5.4

14.8 5.6 6.2 6.5 5.3

29.9 5.2

100.0

3.62

98 5

IRELAND

1982 X %

3.0 3.3 5.3 5.2 6.6

13.2 6.5 7.8 6.9 8.9

27.9 5.6

100.0

3.33

1007

x I x - X I % I %

I I

4.2 I 2.2 2.8 I 2.5 3.2 I 4.3 7.9 I 4.1 6.8 I 3.7

13.9 1 12.4 5.0 I 4.3 7.8 I 5.5 7.2 I 7.5 7.4 I 8.8

26.2 I 36.9 I

7.7 I 7.9

3.50 I 2.70

G&G-

x - X I I x - X I % I %

I I

4.5 I 2.2 3.4 I 4.4

10.9 I 11.1

2.5 I 2.2 1.6 I 1.4

3.1 I 4.8

6.1 I 7.3 5.6 I 8.9 6.6 I 8.2 6.8 I 9.7

35.9 I 30.8 13.0 I 8.9

I

GJTG- TJG-

- 1987 x - X I

%

2.9 1.8 3.3 5.1 4.9

11.2 8.4 6.7 0.2 7.5

32.0 7.8

.oo.o 2.94

997

- - -

1971 V I I

% -

3.5 1.3 2.0 2.5 3.0 7.0 6.1 8.5 9.1 9.5

37.7 9.8

OO. o 2.34

2017

- - - -

1977 x - X I

%

2.7 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.4 8.8 5.1 9.3 8.7

12.6

38.6 3. O

100.0

2.38

1155

I T A L I A

1980 I 1981 I 1982 I V I x - X I I x % I % I %

x i x - X I i x - X I % I % I %

x - X I I x - X I 1 % I a 1

1.9 I 1.0 I 1.0 I 1.2 I 1.9 I 1.7 I 2.6 I 2.7 I 3.0 I 4.4 I

12.2 I 9.6 I 6.8 I 7.3 I

12.0 I 11.4 I 11.5 I 12.6 I 14.2 I 14.2 I

i i 32.2 I 32.8 I

- B 127 -

.

1983 1984 1985


1986 1987

I

1977 1980

LUXEMBOURG ' I

1981 1982 - 1971 V I I

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

%

1 O 2 1 2

1 3 2 9 7 5

42 16

100.0 100.0

L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10



T o t a l

S c o r e moyen/#ean s c o r e

N

No d a n g e r o f war O

344 300

.oo.o 1.95

302

- - - 500 300

I 3.07 1 2.78 I 1.79 I 1.98 12.10

304 I 299 I 300 I 301 ( 3 0 2 I

NEDERLAND - 1987 x - X I

% -

o. 2 O. 5 0 .8 2.0 2.8 9.4 5 . 5

13.6 12.9 27.4

20.1 4.8

OO. o -

- 1983

X %

1.2 O. 8 2.4 3:1 4.6

15.9 8.8

12.0 14.1 12.7

20.4 4. O

100.0 -

1980 I V

1986 x - X I . %

O. 5 O. 3 1 .3 o. 9 3.1 7.6 6.0

12.1 14.4 25.6

25. O 3.1

1oo:o

2.03

1026

-

-

1982 X

1981 x - X I x - X I I x - X I

% I %

I I

0.7 I 1.7 0.4 I 1 .3 2.2 I 1.3 3.8 I 2.2 3.1 I 3.3

13.3 I 9.5 7.0 I 6.0

14.2 I 12.6 13.2 I 12.1 16.8 I 23.4

20.7 I 21.6 I

4.4 I 4.9

V I I I x - X I % I %

I I

1 I 1 .9

3 I 3.5 2 I 5.3 2 I 3.9

1 I 1.8

13 I 19.0 4 I 8.3 6 I 14.7

10 I 12.6 17 I - 9 . 5

27 I 16.5 14 I 2.9

I

%

0.0 .4.4 6.7 4.0 5.2 8.6

10.5 10.0 20.4

6.5

9.5 14.3

100.0

%

\

2.2 1.6 3.9 3.9 6.3

16.9 8 .5

12.7 11.2 11.5

15.5 5.7

100.0

%

2.4 1.9 2.7 5.6 6.2

21.0 8.6

12.3 9.7

10.8

13.3 5.6

100.0

¡ L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / I W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e l n e x t t e n y e a r s 100 I I I 1 I I I I I INo d a n g e r o f war O

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

/ A u c u n d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

I S a n s rCponse /No r e p l y

I:::,: moyen/Mean s c o r e

I N

> 1

2.38 1 3.41 3.66 3.43 2.67 1 2.43

GJ-G !. 17 2.91

1050

3.65

1011 1198 I 943 999 1056 965 I

- 8 128 -

5.6 I 4.7

100.0 100.0

3.15 2.53


5.0

100.0

2.26

9725 9909 I 9846

I UNITE0 KINGDOM

I 1971 1 1977 I 1980 I 1981 1985 I 1986 I 1987 1982 X %

3.8 o. 9 3.6 3.1 4.5

12.7 4.9 8.4 7.7 9.5

34.8 6.1

100.0

2.73

1335

x - X I I 7

x- X I x I X r X I % I %

I I

2.0 I 3.0 1.4 I 1.0 4.2 I 3.1 5.0 I 3.7 4.1 I 2.6

14.9 I 11.1 6.7 I 4.5

12.7 I 8.1 11.8 I 7.1 12.5 I 8.5

20.4 1 42.9 I

4.2 I 4.4

100.0 I 100.0

GlYT3 1277 I 1405

+y+- x- X I %

1.7 0.7 1.2 2.5 3.2 9.1 4.5 8.6 8.0

13.8

41.9 4.8

100.0

1.98

%

1.9 1.1 1.6 2.0 2.6

10.1 5.6 9.1 9. o

12.2

39.9 4.9

100.0

2.12

i 1

: I 3.6 : I 0.8 : I 2.1 : I 3.1 : I 2.5 : I 10.0

: I 7.5 : I 7.5

: 1 3.6

: 1 8.4

: I 44.6 : 1 6.2

I

. 1 100.0

-7lTl : I 1351

I I

1.3 I 3.1 I 3.1 I 9.7 I

9.5 I

2.6 I 0.7 I

6.3 I 10.5 I

12.3 I

I I

4.8 1 4.0 9.3 1 1.7 6.8 I 4 .7 8.5 1 4.0

- 6 . 7 I 5.5 15.2 I 16.0

3.6 1 6.5

7.7 I 7.0 5.4 I 7.0

18.9 1 28.7 7.0 I 6.1

5.9 1 8.8

I

100.0 I 100.0

TJ--E7 1454 I 1395

L a g u e r r e , e s t c e r t a i n e / k l o r l d war w i t h i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10


Sans r b p o n s e / N o r e p l y

T o t a l

S c o r e moyen/Mean s c o r e

N

No d a n g e r o f war O 36.0 I 4.9 1

.oo.o I 2.3111

1383 1318

COMMUNAUTE / COMMUNITY ( E U R 10) ( 1 ) I 1971 I 1977 V I I I x - X I

% I % I I

: I 2.6

: I 2.6 : I J . 4

: I 3.2 : I 3.1 : I 11.0 : I 5.5 : I 9.5 : I 9.9 : I 11.6

: I 32.1 I

: I 7.4

1983. I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 1980 I V %

3.5 4.3 9.4 6.9 7.1

14. O 7.2 9.1 8.6 6.7

15.7 7.7

1981 x - X I

%

3.5 2.1 4.5 6. O 5.8

14.8 7.2 9.4 8.5 9.3

20.3 8.9

100.0

3.54

9911

- - -

1982 X %

3.0 1.7 2.9 4. O 4.6

13.4 6.5

10.6 9.1

10.1

26.3 7.7 -

100.0 - 3.01

96 89

- -

I I I L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e /

n e x t t e n y e a r s 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

Aucun d a n g e r de g u e r r e / No d a n g e r o f war O Sans rCponse /No r e p l y

T o t a l

S c o r e tnoyen/Mean s c o r e

N

W o r l d war w i t h i n - t h e

x 1 x - X I I x - X I % 1 % 1 %

I I

x - X I I T

I I

1.0 I 2.0 I

3.5 I

11.0 I 12.0 I

I

1 .5 1

2.8 I 9.7 I 6.3 I

14.3 I 31.0 I

2-1 EJ

x - X I . %

1.6 o. 9 1.8 2.6 3.3

10.3 6.1

10.5 10.6 14.2

32.7 5.5

100.0

2.32

9827

- - I 100.0 l -z- 100.0

4.20

8882

- - -

~~

: I 8936

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l a Grèce à p a r t i r d ' o c t o b r e 1981. / I n c l u d i n g Greece f r o m O c t o b e r 1981.

- 8 129 -

1982


1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

La g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / World war w i t h i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

Aucun danger de g u e r r e /

Sans réponse lNo r e p l y

T o t a l

Score moyen/Mean sco re

N

No danger o f war O

100.0 100.0 100.0

2.86 3.87 3.14

1001 1000 1035

x

100.0 100.0 100.0

2.42 2.51 2.07

1003 1010 1016

T o t a l I Score moyen/Mean sco re I N I

x

100.0 100.0

3.22 4.38

1853 1998

I

l I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I

PORTUGAL I

La g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / Wor ld war u i t h - i n t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 I I I I 5 1 4 1

Aucun danger de g u e r r e / I I I I I I No danger o f war o l I I I 20 I 10 I

x - X I I x - X I % I x

I I

2.4 I 1.7 1.7 I 0.7 3.0 I 1.7 5.2 i 4.1

12.1 I 12.3 9.0 I 11.6 9.0 I 13.0

5.7 I 3.8

8.5 I 11.0 8.5 I 9.0

I 21.3 I 19.9 13.6 I 11.2

100.0 I 100.0

x - X I I I % I x [

I I I l

2.0 I I 0.5 I I 2.6 I I 2.2 1 I 2.3 I I 9.7 I I 6.4 I I 6.1 I I 8.8 I I

10.9 I I I I

36.6 1 I 11.9 I I

100.0 I I - E J l

- B 130 -

I I ( L a g u e r r e e s t c e r t a i n e / ] W o r l d war w i t h i n t h e [ n e x t t e n y e a r s 1 O0 I I I 1 I I I I I INo d a n g e r o f war O

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

IAucun d a n g e r de g u e r r e /

[ S a n s rCponse /No r e p l y

1:::;: moyen/Mean s c o r e

I N


COMMUNAUTE / C O M M U N I T Y ( E U R 12) ( 1 ) I 1985 x - X I

%

1.8 o. 9 1.9 2.6 3.4 10.3 5.6 9.5 10.5 13.2

34.5 5.6

100.0

2.31

11849

-

1986 x - X I

%

1.6 1.0 1.8 2.8 3.3 10.4 6.1 10.3 10.6 13:7

32.1 6.5

100.0

2.36

11827

x - X I I % I %

I l

1.5 I 1.0 I 2.0 I

3.3 I 9.5 I

2.8 1

6.1 I 10.7 I 11.6 I 13.9 I

32.0 I I

5.7 I r

%

I %

I $ 1

I I I I I I I I I I I I I l + 7 :

I %

I % I

I I

. I I l . I I I I l I I I I + I I

-t I 7

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

7 I

( 1 ) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l . / I n c l u d i n g Spa<n a n d P o r t u g a l .

l - B 1 3 1 -

1982 1983 1 9 8 4 1 9 8 5

l TABLEAU B l 7 / TABLEAU B l 7

EVALUATION DES CHANGEMENTS DE LA SITUATION E C O N O M I Q U E DES REGIONS A U COURS DES DOUZE DERNIERS MOIS ( 1 )

ASSESSMENT OF THE CHANGES I N THE COUNTRY'S ECONOMIC SITUATION O V E R T H E PAST TWELVE MONTHS

1986

.'

Beaucoup m i e u x / a l o t b e t t e r Un p e u m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / a l i t t l e u o r s e Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n a l o t w o r s e

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

% % % %

Beaucoup m i e u x / a l o t b e t t e r Un peu m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / a l i t t l e worse Beaucoup m o i n s b i e h a l o t worse

%

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

% % %

1.65 1.92 1.96 2.38 2.15

/ BELGIE

1982

1 9 8 7 I 1

1983 1 9 8 4 1985 ' 1986 1987

%

i i 2 0 I I 40 I I

I I 2 5 I I

I I

% % % % % % % % %

11 I I 2.23

1.63

I I

2.79 2.59 2.65 2.26 2.19

i I

i I

I i - 7

4 1 5

4 3

I l I I l I I I I I I l I l I I l I

1 ) L e s " s a n s r é p o n s e s I 1 n e . s e t r o u v e n t p a s dans l e t a b l e a u m a i s s o n t c o m p r i s dans l e c a l c u l d e s p o u r c e n t a g e s / I1Don1 t knows1I e x c l u d e d f r o m t h e t a b l e b u t i n c l u d e d i n t h e c a l c u l a t i o n o f p e r c e n t a g e s .

2 ) C a l c u l é e n a f f e c t a n t r e s p e c t i v e m e n t d e s c o e f f i c i e n t s 4, 3, 2 e t 1 l e s r é p o n s e s I fbeaucoup m ieux" , "un p e u m ieux" , I l un p e u m o i n s b i e n " e t " beaucoup m o i n s b i e n " . L e s r é p o n s e s r e s t a n t l e s mêmes a i n s i que l e s I l ne s a i t p a s t 1 s o n t e x c l u e s . Le p o i n t c e n t r a l e s t de 2.50. En d e s s o u s de c e n i v e a u , l e s r é p o n s e s n é g a t i v e s p r é d o m i n e n t , e t e n d e s s o u s de c e n i v e a u p r é d o m i n e n t l e s r é p o n s e s p o s i t i v e s / I n d e x c a l c u l a t e d b y a p p l y i n g t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s 4, 3, 2 a n d 1 r e s p e c t i v e l y t p t h e r e p l i e s I la l o t b e t t e r " , I l a l i t t l e b e t t e r " , l i t t l e worse l l and I la l o t worseu f . R e p l i e s t h a t t h e s i t u a t i o n r e m a i n e d t h e same a r e e x c l u d e d , a s a r e t h e " d o n ' t knowst1. The m i d - p o i n t i s 2.50. Be low t h i s l e v e l , t h e n e g a t i v e a n s w e r s p r e d o m i n a t e and above, t h e p o s i t i v e ones .

- B 1 3 2 -

1 9 8 2

TABLEAU B 1 7 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 8 1 7 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

DEUTSCHLAND I

1983 1 9 8 4 1985 1986 1 9 8 7

Beaucoup mieux / a l o t b e t t e r Un peu m'ieux/ a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un peu moins b i e n / a l i t t l e worse Beaucoup moins b i e n

%

3 0 1 37

4 3 I 29 I

I

% % % % % % % % %

a l o t worse I 1 9 1 7

2.75

1 9 8 4 1 1985 I 1 9 8 6

2.49 2.45 1.73 2.17 2.09

x-XI I x-XI i x-XI % [ % I %

1982

3 i 3 i ' 7

1983 1 9 8 4 1985 1986 1987

i i 25 I 30 I 42 4 5 I 42 I 3 8

%

I l / 20 1 19 I 9

l I 5 1 3 1 2

% % % % % % % % %

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 ) I 1.76 I 2.29 I 2.47 1 2.59 1 2.89

1.92

¡Beaucoup mieux / ( a l o t b e t t e r l u n peu mieux / l a l i t t l e b e t t e r [Même c h o s e / t h e same ] U n peu moins b i e n / ( a l i t t l e worse 1 Beaucoup moins b i e n l a l o t worse

1.98 1.79 2.12 2.25 2.07

( I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

Beaucoup mieux / a l o t b e t t e r Un peu mieux / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un peu moins b i e n / a l i t t l e worse Beaucoup moins b i e n a l o t w o r s e

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

1987 1, I %

x-XI 1 I

54 I I I I

23 I I I I

2 1 I

-I-t I I

I I l l l I l I I l I I I I

% 1 % 1

2.44 I I

! - B 133 -

%

TABLEAU B l 7 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l 7 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

% % % % % % % %

1982 i 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

I , (Beaucoup

x l a l o t b e lun p e u m l a l i t t l e

% % % % % % % % % m i e u x / t e r e u x / b e t t e r

Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / a l i t t l e w o r s e Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n a l o t worse

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

% % t % %

1.75 I 1.94 I 2.29 I 2.25 I 2.72 I 2.26 1 I I 1 1

i1982 I x I T -

i I

l a l o t b e t t e r l . l u n p e u m i e u x / I l a l i t t l e b e t t e r 1 6

IUn p e u m o i n s b i e n / I l a l i t t l e worse I 4 3

I 25

(Beaucoup m i e u x /

lMême c h o s e / t h e same I 24

[Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n I

I 1.75

1983 I 1984 x I x - X I

1 1 1 I

I

I

"I"

9 I 32 22 I 27

53 I ,31

11 I 5

1.98 I 2.42

LUXEMBOURG I 1985 I 1986 x- X I I x - X I

4 1 6 I

48 I 5 1 26 I 29

1 4 I 10 I

I 5 1 2

2.73 I 2.88

3 1 I I i i 2.56

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r / s e e page B 131.

- B 134 -

% Beaucoup m i e u x / P l

TABLEAU 817 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 81'7 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

% % % % % % % %

a l o t worse I 3 4 I 15

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 ) I 1.67 I 2.08

I (Beaucoup m i e u x / l a l o t b e t t e r l u n p e u m i e u x / l a l i t t l e b e t t e r IMême c h o s e / t h e same /Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / l a l i t t l e worse /Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n

8 1 . 3 1 3 1 4 1 I I I I 2.54 I 2.81 I 2.79 I 2.45 I

I JBeaucoup m i e u x / l a l o t b e t t e r (Un p e u m i e u x / l a l i t t l e b e t t e r IMtme c h o s e / t h e same l u n p e u m o i n s b i e n / l a l i t t l e worse (Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n

%

U N I T E D KINGDOM T

% % % % % % % % %

2.11 2.14

16 I 22 1 16 I 2 1 I 22 I 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

2 6 I 27 I 33 I 32 I 32 I 17 I I I 1 I I l I l I I l I I I

1.93 2.05 2.07 2.66

1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r / s e e page B 131.

%

( 3 ) Moyenne p o n d d r d e / w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e .

% x % % % % % % %

1.88 2.10 2.15 2.27 2.48 2.34

Beaucoup m i e u x / a l o t b e t t e r Un p e u m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / a l i t t l e w o r s e Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n a l o t w o r s e


I I

7 1 5 1 I

Beaucoup m i e u x / a l o t b e t t e r Un p e u m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / a l i t t l e w o r s e Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n a l o t worse

I


% %

Beaucoup m i e u x / a l o t b e t t e r Un p e u m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b ien - / a l i t t l e w o r s e . Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n a l o t w o r s e


% %

- B 135 -

TABLEAU Bl7 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE Bl7 ( c o n t i n u e d ) (1)

1986

1985 x - X I

% -

3

24 26

28

12 - I

1987

ESPANA

%

1986 I 1987 I I

% % %

%

3 1 3 1 i I I I

28 I 31 I I 28 I 36 I I

2 % % % % % % % %

I I I 29 I 22 1 l

I I I

2.26

I 7-p- I

I I I I I I

,2.48 2.38

% I I

I I I I I - I I I I l I I I I

% %

1985 x - X I

%

1

16 33

30

14

2.06

PORTUGAL

12 I 11 I i I I I

3. I 2 .I I

2.80 I 2.91 I I

I +

* I l I I I l I

I +

Í

I I I I I I l

%

COMMUNAUTE / COMMUNITY (EUR 12), (3) I

i I

26 I 32 I 25 I I I I I I I I

2 j 4 1 3 j i i i i i i I I I I I I I I I

(1)(2) V o i r / s e e p a g e B 131.

(3) Y c o m p r i s l ' E s p a g n e e t l e P o r t u g a l à p a r t i r de 1985 / i n c l u d i n g P o r t u g a l a n d S p a i n s i n c e 1985.

- B 136 -

% %

T A B L E A U Bl8 / T A B L E Bl8

% % % % % % % %

E V A L U A T I O N D E S C H A N G E M E N T S D A N S L A S I T U A T I O N D E S M E N A G E S A U C O U R S D E S D O U Z E D E R N I E R S M O I S ( 1 )

1.86

A S S E S S M E N T OF T H E C H A N G E S I N T H E F I N A N C I A L S I T U A T I O N OF I N D I V I D U A L H O U S E H O L D S O V E R T H E P A S T T W E L V E M O N T H S

1.94 2.02 2.05 2.15 1.99

i I IBeaucoup m i e u x / l a l o t b e t t e r [Un peu m i e u x / I a l i t t l e b e t t e r IMême c h o s e / t h e same lun p e u m o i n s b i e n / l a l i t t l e worse IBeaucoup m o i n s b i e n

I l I D A N MARK I l 1 1982 I 1983 1 1984 I 1985 1 1986 I 1987 I

I I I I x I x I x - X I I x - X I I x - X I 1 x - X I 1

I I I I Un p e u m i e u x / I I I I l I I I I I I a l i t t l e b e t t e r I 13 I 15 I 17 I 18 I 18-1 19 1 I I I I Même c h o s e / t h e same I 46 I 52 I 50 1 50 I 46 I 46 I l l l I Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / I I I I l l I I I I I

I I l I Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n I I I I I I I l I l I a l o t worse I 6 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 5 1 5 1 I I I I

% I

% I

% % % % % % % Beaucoup m i e u x / P l a l o t b e t t e r I 3 1 5 1 5 1 6 1 5 1 6 1

a l i t t l e worse I 25 1 19 1 20 I 19 I 22 1 23 I

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 ) I 2.29 I 2.46 I 2.46 I 2.55 I 2.46 I 2.34 I

B E L G I Q U E / B E L G I E

% IBeaucoup m i e u x / P l

T

% % % % % % % %

- B 137 -

1982 1983 1984 1985

TABLEAU 818 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE 818 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

1986

ELLAS I

% ' % % % % % % % % % Beaucoup mieux / a l o t b e t t e r Un peu m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un peu moins b i e n / a l i t t l e w o r s e Beaucoup moins b i e n a l o t w o r s e

% %

10

32 36

1 5

% %

7 1 7 1 2 1 7 I I I

l l I

25 I 26 I 11 I 23 35 I 40 I 39 I 32

1.85 1.78 1.89

4 1 I

2 1 I 32 I

I 22 I

I

1.99

I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I

1983 1984

23 i 18 I 28 I 23 I I I

1986 1986

1 0 i 8 18 i 14

% % % ' %

1.70 1.75 1.93 1.91

6

i I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 ) 2.74 I 2.44 I 2.55 I , 1 . 9 4 I 2.34

FRANCE

7 x-XI I

2 1 I

8 1 43 I

I 30 I

I

3-

1982 X % -

1

9 3 8

35

14

1.96 - -

1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I T-p- I

I I I I I I I +-

- % Beaucoup mieux /

a l o t b e t t e r Un peu mieux / a l i t t l e b e t t e r M8me c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u moins b i e n / a l i t t l e w o r s e Beaucoup moins b i e n a l o t w o r s e

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

2 1 2 ' 1 1 1 2

8 1 5 1 9 1 9 I 1 I

IRELAND

19871 -Tp-- x-XI I

1 1 I

9 1 37 I

I 33 I

I -s-í--

7 I

I l I I I I I t

1982 X % -

1

5 32

34

2 6

1.73

- -

- % Beaucoup mieux /

a l o t b e t t e r Un peu mieux / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u moins b i e n / ~

a l i t t l e w o r s e Beaucoup moins b i e n a l o t w o r s e

31 I 3 1 I 40 I 34

3 1 I 34 I 30 I 30 I I I

I I I

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r n o t e s du t a b l e a u 817 p a g e B 1 3 1 / s e e n o t e s t o t a b l e E17 p a g e 8 131.

- B 138 -


TABLEAU 818 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l 8 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

% % % % % % % %

Beaucoup m i e u x / a l o t b e t t e r Un peu m i e u x / a l i t t l e b e t t e r Même c h o s e / t h e same Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / a l i t t l e worse Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n a l o t worse

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 1

I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

I I T A L I A I I 1982 I 1983 I 1984 I 1985 I 1986 I 1987 I

I I x I x I x - X I I x- X I 1 x - X I I x - X I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 15 I 17 I 17 I 19 I 24 I 20 I I l I I I 5 0 I 50 I 54 I 52 I 54 I 58 I I I I I l I I I I I l I I l I I 24 1 24 I 19 I 20 I 15 I 16 I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I 8 1 7 1 7 1 6 1 4 1 4 1 I I l l

% I

% I

% % % % % % % 1 % I 2 1 1 1 2 1 i / 2 1 2 1

I 2.21 I 2.24 I 2.31 I 2.36 I 2.54 I 2.02 I

2.08 2.05 2.19 2.34 2.80 2.28

I

I I I I I I I I I I I

1 % 1 % Beaucoup m i e u x / % % % % % % % %

( 1 ) ( 2 ) V o i r n o t e s d u t a b l e a u B l 7 page B 131 / see n o t e s t o t a b l e 817 page 8 131.

- B 1 3 9 -

% % % %

TABLEAU Bl8 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE B l 8 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )

% % % % % % i IBeaucoup m i e u x / l a l o t b e t t e r [ U n p e u m i e u x / l a l i t t l e b e t t e r [Même c h o s e / t h e same [ U n p e u m o i n s b i e n / l a l i t t l e worse IBeaucoup m o i n s b i e n l a l o t worse

2.12 2 .19 2.16 2.26 ) I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 ) 2.29 2.61

I IBeaucoup m i e u x / l a l o t b e t t e r l u n peu m i e u x / l a l i t t l e b e t t e r [Même c h o s e / t h e same I U n p e u m o i n s b i e n / I a l i t t l e worse [ B e a u c o u p m o i n s b i e n l a l o t worse

1 9 8 2

[ I n d i c e / i n d e x ( 2 )

1 9 8 3 1 9 8 4 1 9 8 5 1 9 8 6 1 9 8 7

[Beaucoup m i e u x / l a l o t b e t t e r

. /Un p e u m i e u x / l a l i t t l e b e t t e r (Même c h o s e / t h e same IUn p e u m o i n s b i e n / l a l i t t l e worse IBeaucoup m o i n s b i e n l a l o t worse

% % % %

I I n d i c e j i n d e x ( 2 )

% % % % % %

UNITED KINGDOM I

2.14 2.15 2 .18 2 .22 2 . 3 5 2.18

COMMUNAUTE / COMMUNI TY ( E U R 10). ( 3 ) I

% % % % % % % % % %

2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 4

4 5 I 44 I 4 5 I 47 I 47

I I I I 1 3 I 1 4 I 1 4 I 16 I 1 9

4 1 I

1 8 I 50 I

ESPAlOA I

1 i - 1

I .I I

I I I

1 4 1 1 3 I 1 8 I 5 1 I 5 2 I 5 6 I 2 2 I 24 I 16 I

8 1 5 1 5 1 I l I I I l I

2.25 I 2 .22 I 2 . 0 3 I I I I I I 'I I ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) V o i r n o t e s d u t a b l e a u B I 7 p a g e s 8 1 3 1 e t B 1 3 4 / see n o t e s t o t a b l e B 1 7 pages 8 1 3 1 a n d B 134.

- B 140 -

1

TABLEAU Bl8 ( s u i t e ) / TABLE Bl8 ( c o n t i n u e d ) ( 1 )


PORTUGAL I

% % % % % % % %

% Beaucoup m i e u x /

I COMMUNAUTE / C O M M U N I T Y (EUR 12) ( 3 )

%

I 1985 I 1986 I /987

a l o t b e t t e r I 3 1 4 1 4 Un p e u m i e u x / I I I

Un p e u m o i n s b i e n / I I I Beaucoup m o i n s b i e n I I I

a l i t t l e b e t t e r I 15 I 19 I 19 Même c h o s e / t h e same 1 47 I 47 I 51

a l i t t l e worse I 23 I 20 1 18

a l o t worse ! 1 0 1 8 1 7

I n d i c e / i n de x ( .2) I 2.21 I 2.35 I 2.17

I 1 l I I I I I

7 %

I

I %

I I

I I I I l +

I l I I l I +

( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) V o i r n o t e s d u t a b l e a u 817 p a g e s B 131 e t B 135 / see n o t e s t o t a b l e Bl7 pages B 131 a n d B 135.

B - 141 -

R E C H E R C H E S S U R L E S A T T I T U D E S a D E S E U R O P E E N S S U R V E Y S ON A T T I T U D E S OF T H E EUROPEfSNS

( 1 ) "LES EUROPEENS ET L'UNIFICATION DE L'EUROPE" / "EURO- PEANS AND EUROPEAN UNIFICATION" (FR/EN) Sondage de février-mars 1970 / Survey carried out in Febru- ary-March 1970 Juin 1972 / June 1972 - 240 p.

( 2 ) "L'OPINION DES EUROPEENS SUR LES ASPECTS REGIONAUX ET AGRICOLES DU MARCHE COHHUN, L'UNIFICATION POLITIQUE DE L'EUBOPE ET L'INFORHATION DU PUBLIC" (FR) Sondage du juillet 1971 / Survey carried out in July 1971 Décembre 1971 / December 1971 - 64 p.

( 3 ) "SATISFACTION ET INSATISFACTION QUANT AUX CONDITIONS DE VIE DANS LES PAYS DE LA COHHUNAUTE EUROPEENNE" (FR) Sondage de septembre 1973 / Survey carried out in September 1973 Juin 1974 / June 1974 - 120 p.

( 4 ) "L'EUROPE VUE PAR LES EUROPEENS" (FR) Sondage de septembre 1973 / Survey carried out in September 1973 Août 1974 / August 1974 - 48 p .

( 5 ) "EURO-BAROHETREw/"EUROBAROHETERn (Disponible dans toutes les langues communautaires /Available in all Community languages) Sondage semestriel dont les resultats sont publids depuis juin 1 9 7 4 . 1 Half-yearly survey published as from June 1974 .

( 6 ) "FEHHES ET HOHHES D'EUROPE" / "EUROPEAN HEN AND UOHEN" (FR/EN) Décembre 1975 / December 1975 - 215 p.

( 7 ) "LE CONSOHHATEUR EUROPEEN" / "EUROPEAN CONSUHER" ( F R / E N 1 Mai 1976 / May 1976 - 175 p .

( 8 ) "LA PERCEPTION DE LA HISERE EN EUROPE" / "THE PERCEPTION OF POVERTY IN EUROPE" (FR/EN/DE/NL/DAI Mars 1977 / March 1977 - 144 p. - 2è édition (FR) septembre 1 9 8 1 .

B - 142 -

(9) "LA SCIENCE ET L'OPINION PUBLIQUE EUROPEENNE" / "SCIENCE AND EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION" (FR/EN/DE/IT/NL) Octobre 1977 / October 1977 - 98 p .

(10)"LES ATTITUDES DE LA POPULATION ACTIVE A L'EGARD DES PERSPECTIVES DE LA RETRAITE" / "THE ATTITUDES OF THE YORKING POPULATION TO RETIREHENT" (FR/EN/DE/IT/NL/DA) Mai 1978 / May 1978 - 52 p .

(11l"LES ATTITUDES DU PUBLIC EUROPEEN FACE AU DEVELOPPEHENT SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE" / "THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC'S ATTITUDES TO SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL DEVELOPHENT" (FR/EN) Février 1979 / Fevruary 1979 - 67 p .

(12)"FEHHES ET HOHHES D'EUROPE EN 1978" / "EUROPEAN HEN AND WOHEN IN 1978" (FRIEN/DE) Février 1979 / February 1979 - 248 p .

(13)"CHOHAGE ET RECHERCHE D'UN EHPLOI: attitudes et opinions des publics européens" (FR + résumés en /summaries available in: EN/DE/NL/IT/DA) Septembre 1979 / September 1979 - 74 p .

(14)"LES EUROPEENS ET LEURS ENFANTS" / "THE EUROPEANS AND THEIR CHILDREN" (FR/EN/DE/NL/IT/DA) Octobre 1979 /October 1979 - 102 p .

(15)"LES FEHHES SALARIEES EN EUROPE: comment elles percoivent les discriminations dans le travail" / "EUROPEAN WOHEAN IN PAID EHPLOYHENT: their perception of discrimination at work" (FR/EN/DE/NL/IT/DA) Decembre 1980 / December 1980 - 72 p .

(161"LES EUROPEENS ET LEUR REGION: étude exploratoire sur la perception des disparitdis socio-économiques" / "EUROPEANS AND THEIR REGION: public perception of the socio-economic disparities: an exploratory study" (FR/EN/DE/NL/IT/DA) D6cembre 1980 / December 1980 - 62 p .

O

(17)"L'OPINION EUROPEENNE ET LES QUESTIONS ENERGETIQUES" / "THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION AND THE ENERGY PROBLEH " (FR/EN .t r6sum4s dans les autres langues communautaires) / (FR/EN +

summaries in o t h e r languages of the Community). Octobre 1982 / October 1982 - 79 p.

1

B - 143 -

(18)"LES JEUNES EUROPEENS: étude exploratoire des jeunes &ges de 15 P 2 4 ans dans les pays de la Communauté euro- péenne" / "THE YOUNG EUROPEANS: Exploratory study on young people aged between 15 and 2 4 years in the countries of the European Community" - (FR/EN/DE/NL/IT/DA/EL)) Décembre 1982 / December 1982 - 139 p.

(19)"LE PARLEHENT EUROPEEN ET L'ELECTION DE 1984" (FR) Août 1983 / August 1983 - 105 p.

0

(20) "LES EUROPEENS ET LEUR ENVIRONNEMENT" / "EUROPEANS AND THEIR ENVIRONHENT" (FR/EN/NL/IT/DA) Novembre 1983 / November 1093 - 64 p.

(21)"LES EUROPEENS ET L'AIDE AU DEVELOPPEHENT" / "EUROPEANS AND AID TO DEVELOPHENT" (FR/EN) Sondage de septembre-octobre 1983 / Survey carried out in September/October 1983 Mai 1984 /May 1984 - 134 p .

(22)"FEHHES ET HOHHES D'EUROPE EN 1983 / "EUROPEAN YOHEN AND HEN IN 1983" - (FR/EN + résumés disponibles dans les autes langues communautaires / F R I E N + summaries available in other languages of the Community). Juin 1984 / June 1984 - 186 p.

(23)"LES FEHHES SALARIEES EN EUROPE - 1984" / "EUROPEAN UOHEN' IN PAID EHPLOYHENT" (FRIEN). Décembre 1984 / December 1984 - 118 p .

(24)"LE PUBLIC EUROPEEN ET LIINFOl?HATION DES CONSOHMATEURS:

Mars 1985 / March 1985 - 18 p. COHPARAISOWS 1975-1 985" (FR 1

(25)"L'OPINION EUROPEENE ET LES QUESTIONS ENERGETIQUES EN 1984 " / "THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION AND THE ENERGY PROBLEH IN 1984" (FR + résumés DE/EN) / (FR + summaries DEIEN) Juillet 1985 / July 1985 - 99 p .

(26)"L'OPINION DES SALARIES EUROPEENS SUR LA FLEXIBILITE DANS LES CONDITIONS DE TRAVAIL" (FR) Juillet 1985 / July 1985

- 1 4 4 -

(26a) "ENQUETE AURPES DES TRAVAILLEURS SALARIES SUR LA FLEXIBILITE DANS LES CONDITIONS DE TRAVAIL" / "EHPLOYEE SURVEY ON LABOUR HARKET FLEXIBILITY" (Economie européenne / European Economy no 27) Mars 1986 / March 1986

(27)"LE PUBLIC EUROPEEN ET L'ECU" / "EUROPEANS AND THE ECU" (FRIEN/DE). Enqu&te faite dans sept pays de la Communauté européenne à l'initiative d'un groupe de banques. / Survey carried out in seven EC countries on behalf of a group of banks. Novembre 1985 / November 1985 - 43 p.

(28)"LES EUROPEENS ET LES VACANCES" / "EUROPEANS AND THEIR HOLIDAYS" (Disponible dans toutes les langues communautaires / Available in all Community languages. Sondage de mars-avril 1986/Survey carried out in March-April

Mars 1987/March 1987 - 104 p. 1986.

(29)"EUROPE 2000" / "EUROPE 2000" (available in all Com- munity languages/disponsible dans toutes les langues communautaires). Survey carried out in December 1986 - January 1987./Sondage de d4cembre 1986 - janvier 1987 Special 30th Anniversary Edition of the EUROBAROMETER, March 1987lEdition spéciale 30è Anniversaire, mars 1987 - 58 p.

(30)"LES EUROPEENS ET LEUR ENVIRONNEHENT EN 1986"/ "EUROPEANS AND THEIR ENVIRONHENT IN 1986" (Disponible dans toutes les langues communautaires/available in all Community languages. Sondage de mars-avril 1986 /Survey carried out in March- April 1986. Mars 1987/March 1987 - 107 p.

(31)"LES EUROPEENS ET LA SECURITE ROUTIERE" / "EUROPEANS AND ROAD SAFETY" Sondage d'octobre-novembre 1986/Survey carried out in October-November 1986. A paraître en 1988/Forthcoming 1988

(32)"L'OPINION EUROPEENNE ET LES QUESTIONS ENERGETIQUES EN 1986" / "EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION AND THE ENERGY PROBLEM IN 1986" (Disponible dans toutes les langues communautaires/available in all Community languages). Sondage d'octobre-novembre 1986/Survey carried out in October-November 1986. Janvier 1988/January 1988 - 163 p .

B - 145 -

(33)"L'EUROPE CONTRE LE CANCER. Les européens et la prévention du cancer: Une étude d'opinion publique " / "EUROPE AGAINST CANCER: Survey: Europeans and the prevention of cancer" (Disponible dans toutes les langues communautaires/Available in all Community languages. Sondage de mars-avril 1987/Survey carried out in March-April 1987. Octobre 1987/0ctober 1987 - 41 p.

(34)"LES EUROPEENS. LEUR AGRICULTURE ET LA POLITIQUE AGRICOLE COHHUNE " / "EUROPEANS, AGRICULTURE AND THE COHHON AGRICULTRUAL POLICY" (FRIEN; disponible dans les autres languages communautaires en été 1988/available in the other languages of the Community by Summer 1988 ; Résumé disponible dans les autres languges communautaires/summary available in the other languages of the Community). Sondage de mars-avril 1987/Survey carried out in March-April 1987. Edition spéciale de 1'Euro-Baromètre - Février 1988 / Special edition of the Eurobarometer - February 1988 - 6 0 p.

(35)"HOHHES ET FEHHES D'EUROPE 1987. Evolution des opinions et des attitudes" / "EUROPEAN HEN AND UOHEN IN 1987. The evolution of opinions and attitudes". Sondage de mars-avril 1987/Survey carried out in March-April 1987. A paraître en 1988/Forthcoming in 1988.

(36)"L'OPINION EUROPEENNE ET LES QUESTIONS ENERGETIQUES EN 1987 / "EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION AND THE ENERGY PROBLEH IN 1987". Sondage d'octobre - novembre 1987/Survey carried o u t in October - November 1987. A paraître en 1988/Forthcoming in 1988.

(37)"LES EUROPEENS ET L'AIDE AU DEVELOPPEHENT EN 1987" / "EUROPEANS AND AID TO DEVELOPHENT". Sondage d'octobre - novembre 1987/Survey carried out in October-November 1987. A paraître 1988/Forthcoming in 1988.

(38)"LES JEUNES EUROPEENS EN 1987" / "THE YOUNG EUROPEANS IN 1987". Sondage d'octobre-novembre 1987 / Survey carried out in October-November 1987. A paraître 1988/Forthcoming in 1988.

B - 146 -

Technical Specifications for Socio-demographic and Socio-political Variables Used in Crosstabulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SOCIAL CLASS

is based upon answers to the question on occupation of the head of household of the person interviewed. From the categories used to code occupation:

Self-employed ( 1 ) Farmers, fishermen (skippers) ( 2 ) Professional -lawyers, accountants,etc. ( 3 ) Business - owners of shops, craftsmen,

proprietors

Employed ( 4 ) Manual worker ( 5 ) White collar - office worker ( 6 ) Executive, top management, director

Not employed ( 7 ) Retired ( 8 ) Housewife, not otherwise employed ( 9 ) Student, military service ( O ) Unemployed

only those cases falling into the groups "employed" and llself-employedll are used for the respective analyses.

Categories ( 1 1 , ( 2 1 , ( 3 ) and ( 6 ) are labelled "UPPER AND OLD MIDDLE CLASS", category ( 5 ) is labelled llNEW MIDDLE CLASS", category ( 4 ) is labelled "WORKING CLASS".

EUROPEAN PABLIAHENTARY PARTY PREFERENCE

is based upon the question "If there were a General Election tomorrow (say i f c o n t a c t under 18: and you had a vote), which party would you support?" in each country in the wording usually used for this topic. Answers are grouped according t o the affiliation of the representatives of the respective party to a group in the European Parliament. If a party is not represented in the European Parliament at the time the survey is carried out but had been represented before, i t l s supporters are grouped with the EP group their party had been affiliated with. Supporters of parties represented in the European Parliament but their Members of the Euro- pean Parliament not being affiliated to any group are labelled N. I. Supporters of parties not represented in t h e European Parliament are labelled "other". Labels are presented in the order in which they figure in the

B - 1 4 7 -

"List of Members" of the European Parliament of Oct. 1 9 8 7 . Abbreviations in tables are also taken from this publication:

s = PPE =

.ED = COM = LDR = RDE =

ARC

DR = NI =

Socialist Group Group of the European People's Party

European Democratic Group Communist and Allies Group Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group Group o f the European Renewal and

Rainbow Group: Federation of the Green-

(Christian Democratic Group)

Democratic Alliance

Alternative European Link, Agalev-Ecolo, The Danish People's Movement against Mem- bership of the European Community and the European Free Alliance in the European Parliament

Group of the European Right Non-attached

Weighted average of non-responses to this question for the European Community is 27%. Consequently among those who d o reply, loyal and regular supporters of the respective parties tend to be overrepresented.

OPINION LEADERSHIP

is based on the answers to the following two questions : (A) "When you get together with your friends, would y o u say you discuss political matters frequently, occa- sionally o r never?" and ( B l "When you, yourself hold a strong opinion, d o you ever find yourself persuading your friends, relatives o r fellow workers to share your views? If s o , does this happen often, from time to time o r rarely?" <No = never>. Labels are : + + , + , - , - - . Interviewees giving affirmative answers to both questions are labelled + + , Interviewees giving negative answers ko both questions are labelled - - . Middle cate- goriek are constituted correspondingly.

VALUE ORIENTATION

is based on the following question:

"There is a lot of talk these days about what this countryls goals should be for the next ten or fiftee-n years. On this card are listed some of the goals that different people say should be given top priority ( s h o w c a r d ) . would you please say which of them you yourself consider most important in the long run?'' Ishow t h e c a r d l t o n e a n s w e r o n l y )

8 - 1 4 8 - i consider most important in the long run?" tshbw the card) tone answer only)

"And what would be your second choice?"

( 1 ) Maintaining order in the nation ( 2 ) Giving the people more say in im-

portant government decisions ( 3 ) Fighting rising prices ( 4 ) Protecting freedom and speech

c

Respondents combining item ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) are labelled "materialist", those combining items ( 2 ) and ( 4 ) are labelled "post-materialist", others are labelled "mixed"< 1 > .

SELF-PLACEHENT ON THE LEFT-BIGHT-SCALE

is based upon answers to the question "In political matters, people talk of "the left" and the llrightll. How would you place your views on this scale? (Show card) (Do not prompt. The 10 Boxes o f the card are numbered. Ring choice. I f contact hesitates, ask h i m . to try agaf nl

Left Right

In this report, those who reply are grouped in tertiles of the one third of respondents placing themselves most left, the one third most right, and the centre third, for each country. The usual weighting according to each countryvs population aged 1 5 and more is applied. i

f

CLOSENESS TO A PARTY

is based upon answers to the following question: "Do you consider yourself to be close to any particular party? I f s o , do you feel yourself to be very close to this party, fairly close or merely a sympathizer?" labels were given as follows:

+++...........very close ++............fairly close +.............merely a sympathizer O.............close to no particular party

-I-_.- I

I 1 > For additional theoretical and methodological details cf. Ronald Inglehart, The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Uestern Publics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1977.

r r

Standard Eurobarometer 28 - Public Opinion in the European ...ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/eb/eb28/eb28... · PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ... Al

Documents