stance Page 1 - University of Oulu · PDF filestance_ Page 1 Abraham, Werner, ... Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154

stance_bibliography.enl Page 1

Abraham, Werner, Givón, Talmy & Thompson, Sandra A., ed. (1995). Discourse Grammar and Typology: Papers in Honor of John W. M. Verhaar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Abu-Lughod, Lila (1986). Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Agha, Asif (1993). Structural Form and Utterance Context in Lhasa Tibetan: Grammar and Indexicality in a Non-configurational Language. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Aijmer, Karin (1997). I think – an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik, (ed.), Modality in the Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–47.

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Erguvanli-Taylan, Eser (1998). The function of relative clauses in narrative discourse. In Lars Johanson, (ed.), The Mainz meeting: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. August 3-4, 1994. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 271–284.

Andersen, Gisle & Fretheim, Thorstein (2000). Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Andrews, Avery (1985). The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen, (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154.

Auer, Peter (1996). The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics 6(3): 295–322.

Auer, Peter, Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Muller, Frank (1996). Language in Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barbiers, Sjef, Beukema, Frits & van den Wurff, Wim, ed. (2002). Modality and Its Interaction with the Verbal System. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Barton, Ellen L. (1993). Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English 55(7): 745–769.

Barton, Ellen L. (2000). The interactional practices of referrals and accounts in medical discourse: Expertise and compliance. Discourse Studies 2(3): 259–281.

Bazzanella, Carla, ed. (1996). Repetition in Dialogue. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Beach, Richard & Anson, Chris M. (1992). Stance and intertextuality in written discourse. Linguistics and Education 4(3–4): 335–357.

Beach, Wayne A. & Metzger, Terri R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research 23(4): 560–585.

Bencini, Giulia M. L. & Goldberg, Adele E. (2000). The contribution of argument


structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of memory and language 43(4): 640–651.

Benveniste, Emile (1971 [1958]). Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. 223–230.

Besnier, Niko (1989). Literacy and feelings: The encoding of affect in Nukulaelae letters. Text 9(1): 69–91.

Besnier, Niko (1993). Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae atoll. In Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine, (ed.), Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 161–181.

Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11: 1–34.

Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1): 93–124.

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward (1999). The grammatical marking of stance. In Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. 966–986.

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward (1999). The grammar of conversation. In Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. 1037–1125.

Brenneis, Donald (1984). Grog and gossip in Bhatgaon: Style and substance in Fiji Indian conversation. American Ethnologist 3: 487–506.

Brenneis, Donald (1986). Shared territory: Audience, indirection and meaning. Text 6(3): 339–347.

Brenneis, Donald & Meyers, Fred R., ed. (1984). Dangerous Words: Language and Politics in the Pacific. New York, NY: SUNY Press.

Briggs, Charles L. (1996). Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict, and Inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bruner, Jerome (1985). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Budwig, Nancy (2000). Language and the construction of self. In Nancy Budwig, Ina C. Užgiris & James V. Wertsch, (ed.), Communication: An Arena of Development. Stamford, CT: Ablex. 195–214.

Budwig, Nancy (2000). Language, practices, and the construction of personhood. Theory & Psychology 10(6): 769–786.

Budwig, Nancy, Užgiris, Ina C. & Wertsch, James V., ed. (2000). Communication: An Arena of Development. Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Bybee, Joan (1998). The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society 34: 421–435.


Bybee, Joan (2001). Frequency effects on French liaison. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper, (ed.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 337–359.

Bybee, Joan (2002). Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Bertram Malle & Talmy Givón, (ed.), The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107–132.

Bybee, Joan & Fleischman, Suzanne (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul, ed. (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bybee, Joan L. & Noonan, Michael, ed. (2002). Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Chafe, Wallace (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols, (ed.), Evidentials: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Vol. XX. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 261–272.

Chafe, Wallace (1993). Prosodic and functional units of language. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin A. Lampert, (ed.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 33–42.

Chafe, Wallace (1998). Language and the flow of thought. In Michael Tomasello, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 1. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 93–111.

Chafe, Wallace L. & Nichols, Johanna (1986). Evidentials: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Channell, Joanna (2000). Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 38–55.

Chappell, Hilary & Thompson, Sandra A. (1992). The semantics and pragmatics of associative DE in Mandarin discourse. Cahiers Linguistiques Asie Orientale XXI: 199–229.

Chen, Ping (1986). Discourse and particle movement in English. Studies in Language 10(1): 79–95.

Cheshire, Jenny (1996). That jacksprat: An interactional perspective on English that. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 369–393.

Clark, Herbert, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clayman, Steven E. (2002). Disagreements and third parties: Dilemmas of


neutralism in panel news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11): 1333–1669.

Clayman, Steven E. & Heritage, John (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversialness in the press conferences of U.S presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication 52(4): 749–775.

Clift, Rebecca (1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28(4): 523–553.

Clift, Rebecca (2000). Stance-taking in reported speech. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 32.

Coates, Jennifer (1990). Modal meaning: The semantics–pragmatics interface. Journal of Semantics 7: 53–63.

Collins, Peter (1998). The deictic-presentation construction in English. In Peter Collins & David Lee, (ed.), The Clause in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 67–80.

Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56–73.

Cortazzi, Martin & Jin, Lixian (2000). Evaluating evaluation in narrative. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 102–120.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting, (ed.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 366–405.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret (1996). Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting, (ed.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11–55.

Dahl, Östen (2001). Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7(1): 37–77.

Davidse, Kristin & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie (2001). Functions of Language. Aspects of interpersonal grammar: Grounding, modality, and evidentiality.

de Haan, Ferdinand (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18(1): 83–101.

Delahunty, Gerald & Gatzkiewicz, Laura (2000). On the Spanish inferential construction ser que. Pragmatics 10(3): 301–322.

Diessel, Holger (1997). Verb-first constructions in German. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser, (ed.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 51–68.

Downing, Angela (2001). "Surely you knew!": 'surely' as a marker of evidentiality and


stance. Functions of Language 8(2): 253–285.

Downing, Pamela A. (1994). 'Territory of information' and its relation to referential choice: The use of proper names in English conversation. Milwaukee Studies on Language 8: 13–50.

Drew, Paul (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In Ivana Marková & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 21–48.

Du Bois, John W. (1986). Self-evidence in ritual speech. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, (ed.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 313–336.

Du Bois, John W. (1999). Pragmatic differential in the structure of dialogic interaction. Santa Barbara, Department of Linguistics, University of California:

Du Bois, John W. (1999). Dialogic Syntax - theory in progress. Santa Barbara, Department of Linguistics, University of California:

Du Bois, John W. (2001). Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Santa Barbara, Department of Linguistics, University of California:

Du Bois, John W. (2001). Stance: Intersubjectivity and the pragmatic differential in dialogic interaction. Santa Barbara, Department of Linguistics, University of California:

Du Bois, John W. (2003). Argument structure: Grammar in use. In John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby, (ed.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 11–60.

Du Bois, John W. (2003). Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 2. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 47–87.

Du Bois, John W. (forthcoming). The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson, (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Duranti, Alessandro (1986). The audience as co-author: An introduction. Text 6(3): 239–247.

Duranti, Alessandro (1994). From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Duranti, Alessandro & Brenneis, Donald (1986). Text. The audience as co-author.

Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles, ed. (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duranti, Alessandro & Ochs, Elinor (1990). Genitive constructions and agency in Samoan discourse. Studies in Language 14(1): 1–23.


Edwards, Derek (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 347–373.

Englebretson, Robert (2003). Searching for Structure. The Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Englebretson, Robert, ed. (forthcoming). Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Falk, Jane (1980). The conversational duet. Berkeley Linguistics Society 6: 507–514.

Ferrara, Kathleen (1991). Accommodation in therapy. In Howard Giles, Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland, (ed.), Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 187–222.

Ferrara, Kathleen (1994). Reflections: The role of repetition. In Therapeutic Ways with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 108–127.

Field, Margaret (1997). The role of factive predicates in the indexicalization of stance: A discourse perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 27(6): 799–814.

Fillmore, Charles J. (1989). Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In Rainer Dietrich & Carl F. Graumann, (ed.), Language Processing in Social Context. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 17–38.

Flint, Amy Seely (1997). Building Sand Castles and Why Ralph and Keith Are Friends: The Influence of Stance, Intertextuality, and Interpretative Authority in Meaning Construction. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California.

Foppa, Klaus (1995). On mutual understanding and agreement in dialogues. In Ivana Marková, Carl F. Graumann & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 149–175.

Ford, Cecilia A. (2002). Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In Joan L. Bybee, (ed.), Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse. Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 61–78.

Ford, Cecilia A. (2004). Contingency and units in interaction. Discourse Studies 6(1): 27–52.

Ford, Cecilia E. (1993). Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E. (2001). At the intersection of turn and sequence: Negation and what comes next. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting, (ed.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 51–79.

Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia A. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson, (ed.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 14–38.


Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (2003). Social interaction and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 119–143.

Fox, Barbara A. (1994). Contextualisation, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar. Language Sciences 16(1): 1–37.

Fox, Barbara A. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson, (ed.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, Barbara A. (1999). Directions in research: Language and the body. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32(1–2): 51–59.

Fox, Barbara A. (2001). Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2): 167–192.

Gardner, Rod (2001). When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine & Coupland, Nikolas, ed. (1991). Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Goodwin, Charles (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas, (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 97–121.

Goodwin, Charles (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50: 272–302.

Goodwin, Charles (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Goodwin, Charles (1986). Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62(1–2): 29–49.

Goodwin, Charles (1986). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6(3): 283–316.

Goodwin, Charles (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychological Quarterly 50(2): 115–131.

Goodwin, Charles (1989). Turn construction and conversational organization. In Brenda Dervinet al., (ed.), Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Exemplars. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Goodwin, Charles (1993). Recording human interaction in natural settings.


Pragmatics 3(2): 181–209.

Goodwin, Charles (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606–633.

Goodwin, Charles (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3): 233–260.

Goodwin, Charles (1995). Sentence construction within interaction. In Uta M. Quasthoff, (ed.), Aspects of Oral Communication. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. 198–219.

Goodwin, Charles (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1489–1522.

Goodwin, Charles (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In Charles Goodwin, (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 90–116.

Goodwin, Charles (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In Sotaro Kita, (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 217–241.

Goodwin, Charles (2003). Recognizing assessable names. In Phillip J. Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron & Jenny Mandelbaum, (ed.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 151–162.

Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IprA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1): 1–54.

Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). Interstitial argument. In Allen D. Grimshaw, (ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 85–117.

Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin, (ed.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 147–189.

Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1992). Context, activity and participation. In Peter Auer & di Aldo Luzo, (ed.), The Contextualisation of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–99.

Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In Nancy Budwig, Ina C. Užgiris & James V. Wertsch, (ed.), Communication: An Arena of Development. Stamford, CT: Ablex. 33–53.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1996). Informings and announcements in their


environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work setting. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting, (ed.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 436–461.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Goodwin, Charles (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62(1–2): 51–75.

Graumann, Carl F. (1989). Perspective setting and taking in verbal interaction. In Rainer Dietrich & Carl F. Graumann, (ed.), Language Processing in Social Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 95–122.

Graumann, Carl F. & Kallmeyer, Werner, ed. (2002). Perspectivity and Perspectivation in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Grimshaw, Allen D., ed. (1990). Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guendouzi, Jackie (2001). 'You'll think we're always bitching': The functions of cooperativity and competition. Discourse Studies 3(1): 29–51.

Gumperz, John J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin, (ed.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 229–252.

Günthner, Susanne (1997). The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven, (ed.), The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 247–276.

Günthner, Susanne (1998). Polyphony and the "layering of voices" in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 3.

Haddington, Pentti (2002). Congruent gaze points, mutual gaze and evasive gaze: Some ways of using gaze in stance-taking sequences in a conversation. In Elise Kärkkäinen, James Haines & Timo Lauttamus, (ed.), Studia Linguistica et Litteraria Septentrionalia: Studies presented to Heikki Nyyssönen. Oulu: Department of English, University of Oulu.

Haddington, Pentti (2004). Stance taking in news interviews. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 101–142.

Haddington, Pentti (2005). The Intersubjectivity of Stance Taking in Talk-in-Interaction. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oulu.

Haddington, Pentti (2005). The linguistic NEG + POS pattern and two action combinations as resources for interviewee stance taking in news interviews. In Leena Kuure, Elise Kärkkäinen & Maarit Saarenkunnas, (ed.), Kieli ja sosiaalinen toiminta [Language and social action]. AFinLA Yearbook 2005. 85–107.

Haddington, Pentti (forthcoming). Positioning and alignment as activities of stance taking in news interviews. In Robert Englebretson, (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse:


The intersubjectivity of interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Haddington, Pentti (to appear in 2006). Identity and stance taking in news interviews - A case study. In Inger Lassen, Jeanne Strunck & Torben Vestergaard, (ed.), Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 69–95.

Haddington, Pentti (to appear in 2006). The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking. Text and Talk.

Hakulinen, Auli (2001). On some uses of the discourse particle 'kyl(lä)' in Finnish conversation. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, (ed.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 171–198.

Halliday, Michael A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Harré, Rom, ed. (1986). The Social Construction of Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.

Harris, Sandra (2001). Fragmented narratives and multiple tellers: Witness and defendant accounts in trials. Discourse Studies 3(1): 53–74.

Haviland, John B. (1991). 'Sure, sure': Evidence and affect. Text 9(1): 27–68.

Haviland, John B. (1996). Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson, (ed.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 271–323.

Hayashi, Makoto (2001). Postposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation: An interactional account of grammatical practice. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, (ed.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 317–343.

Hayashi, Makoto, Mori, Junko & Takagi, Tomoyo (2002). Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation: An analysis of talk, gaze, and gesture. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson, (ed.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 81–122.

He, Agnes Weiyun (1993). Exploring modality in institutional interactions: Cases from academic counselling encounters. Text 13(2): 503–528.

Heath, Christian (1992). Diagnosis and assessment in the medical consultation. In Paul Drew & John Heritage, (ed.), Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235–267.

Heath, Christian (1992). Gesture's discreet tasks: Multiple relevancies in visual conduct and in the contextualisation of language. In Peter Auer & Aldo di Luzio, (ed.), The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 101–128.

Helt, Marie E. (1997). Discourse Marker and Stance Adverbial Variation in Spoken American English: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation. Northern Arizona University.


Heritage, John (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage, (ed.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 299–345.

Heritage, John (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments. A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In Cecilia A. Ford, Barbara Fox & Sandra A. Thompson, (ed.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 196–224.

Heritage, John (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1427–1446.

Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.

Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey (forthcoming). Constructing agreement: Resources for managing epistemic independence in second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction.

Hill, Jane H. & Irvine, Judith T. (1993). Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hoey, Michael (1983). On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.

Hoey, Michael (2000). Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: A stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 28–37.

Holmes, Janet (1990). Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech. Language & Communication 10(3): 185–205.

Holt, Elizabeth (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3): 219–245.

Holt, Elizabeth (2000). Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 425–454.

Hopper, Paul J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–157.

Hopper, Paul J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 155–176.

Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299.

Hopper, Robert & Glenn, Phillip (1994). Repetition and play in conversation. In Barbara Johnstone, (ed.), Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 29–40.


Horvath, Barbara & Eggins, Suzanne (1995). Opinion texts in conversation. In Peter H. Fries & Michael Gregory, (ed.), Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 29–46.

Hunston, Susan (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 176–207.

Hunston, Susan & Sinclair, John (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74–101.

Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff, ed. (2000). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hutchby, Ian (1997). Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV. Text 17(2): 161–179.

Infantidou, Elly (2001). Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Irvine, Judith (1982). Language and affect: Some cross-cultural issues. In Contemporary Perceptions of Language: Interdisciplinary Dimensions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 31–47.

Irvine, Judith (1990). Registering affect: Heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Catherine A. Lutz & Lila Abu-Lughod, (ed.), Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 126–161.

Irvine, Judith T. (1996). Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In Michael Silverstein & Greg Urban, (ed.), Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 131–159.

Iwasaki, Shoichi (1993). Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Jefferson, Gail (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 2: 181–199.

Jefferson, Gail (1984). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In George Psathas, (ed.), Everyday Language. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers. 79–96.

Jefferson, Gail (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage, (ed.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press. 346–369.

Jefferson, Gail (2002). Is ''no'' an acknowledgment token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1345–1383.

Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey & Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee, (ed.), Talk and Social


Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 152–205.

Johnstone, Barbara (2000). The individual voice in language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 405–424.

Jordan, Michael P. (1998). The power of negation in English: Text, context, and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 29(6): 705–752.

Kamio, Akio (1994). The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21(1): 67–100.

Kamio, Akio (1995). Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 235–264.

Kamio, Akio (1997). Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kamio, Akio (2001). English generic we, you, and they: An analysis in terms of territory of information. Journal of Pragmatics 33(7): 1111–1124.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (1991). Modality as a strategy in spoken interaction: A discourse analytical and pragmatic approach with a particular focus on the English language. Licentiate's Dissertation. University of Oulu.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (1992). Modality as a strategy in interaction: Epistemic modality in the language of native and non-native speakers of English. In Lawrence F. Bouton & Yamuna Kachru, (ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning. University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language. 197–216.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (1996). Preferred Argument Structure and subject role in American English conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 675–701.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (1998). The Marking and Interactional Functions of Epistemic Stance in American English Conversational Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (2002). Asennoituminen keskustelun osanottajien yhteistoimintana [Stance as joint activity between discourse participants]. In Anna Mauranen & Liisa Tiittula, (ed.), Kieli yhteiskunnassa - yhteiskunta kielessä. AFinLA Yearbook 2002. 85–100.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (2003). Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (2003). 'Is she vicious or dense?' Dialogic practices of stance taking in conversation. In Toshihide Nakayama, Tsuyoshi Ono & Hongyin Tao, (ed.), Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 12. Recent Studies in Empirical Approaches to Language. University of California, Santa Barbara: 48–66.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (2004). Interactional practices and linguistic resources of stance taking in spoken English. In Jan-Ola Östman, (ed.), PIC Bulletin 7. University of Helsinki. 45–48.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (2005). Paikallinen kielellinen rutiini: I guess asennoitumisen


jäsentäjänä [A local linguistic routine: I guess as on organizer of stance-taking activity]. In Leena Kuure, Elise Kärkkäinen & Maarit Saarenkunnas, (ed.), Kieli ja sosiaalinen toiminta [Language and social action]. AFinLA Yearbook 2005. 109–126.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (forthcoming). The role of I guess in conversational stance taking. In Robert Englebretson, (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kärkkäinen, Elise (to appear). Stance-taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies.

Kärkkäinen, Elise, Keisanen, Tiina, Rauniomaa, Mirka, Niemelä, Maarit & Haddington, Pentti (2004). Not just old hat: Stance as an emergent, contingent and dialogic concept. In Jan-Ola Östman, (ed.), PIC Bulletin 7. University of Helsinki. 48–59.

Kärkkäinen, Elise, Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa (to appear in 2006). Discourse structure. In Timothy Shopen, (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karlsson, Susanna (2003). Interactional uses for an epistemic marker: The case of 'jag tycker'/'tycker jag' in Swedish. Melbourne Papers in Linguistics and Applied Linguistics 3(1): 5–23.

Keevallik, Leelo (2003). From Interaction to Grammar: Estonian Finite Verb Forms in Conversation. Doctoral Dissertation. Uppsala University.

Keisanen, Tiina (2002). Keskustelijoiden asennoitumiseen käyttämiä vuorovaikutuksellisia ja kielellisiä keinoja naurua sisältävissä sekvensseissä [Interactional and linguistic practices of stance taking in sequences with laughter in conversational American English]. In Anna Mauranen & Liisa Tiittula, (ed.), Kieli yhteiskunnassa - yhteiskunta kielessä. AFinLA Yearbook 2002. 101–119.

Keisanen, Tiina (forthcoming). Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker. In Robert Englebretson, (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Keisanen, Tiina (to appear in 2006). Patterns of stance taking: Negative yes/no interrogatives and tag questions in spoken American English. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oulu.

Kendon, Adam (1967). Some function of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63.

Kendon, Adam (1992). The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin, (ed.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 323–334.

Kendon, Adam (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23(3): 247–279.

Kendon, Adam (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 109–128.


Keppler, Angela & Luckmann, Thomas (1991). 'Teaching': Conversational transmission of knowledge. In Ivana Marková & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 143–165.

Kiesling, Scott Fabius (2002). "Now I gotta watch what I say": Shifting constructions of masculinity in discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 250–273.

Kim, Kyu-hyun (1995). Wh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation: Cases of topicalization. In Pamela Downing & Michael Noonan, (ed.), Word Order in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 247–296.

King, Ruth & Nadasdi, Terry (1999). The expression of evidentiality in French-English bilingual discourse. Language in Society 28(3): 355–365.

Klewitz, Gabriele & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1999). Quote – unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 12.

Knoblauch, Hubert (1991). The taming of foes: The avoidance of asymmetry in informal discussions. In Ivana Marková & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 166–194.

Komter, Martha L. (1995). The distribution of knowledge in courtroom interaction. In Paul ten Have & George Psathas, (ed.), Situated Order. Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Lanham, MD: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America. 107–128.

Koshik, Irene (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics 34(12): 1851–1877.

Koshik, Irene (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5(1): 51–77.

Kotthoff, Helga (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193–216.

Kotthoff, Helga (1998). Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 5.

Krauss, Robert M., Fussell, Susan R. & Chen, Yihsiu (1995). Coordination of perspective in dialogue: Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. In Ivana Marková, Carl F. Graumann & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 124–145.

Kumpf, Lorraine (2002). Information flow, NP form, and gesture. In Language and Gesture. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Labov, William (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. 354–396.


Labov, William & Fanshel, David (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. (1998). Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 1. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1–41.

Lazard, Gilbert (2001). On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 359–367.

Leech, Geoffrey & Coates, Jennifer (1980). Semantic indeterminacy and the modals. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik, (ed.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk. London: Longman. 79–90.

Lemke, Jay L. (1992). Interpersonal meaning in discourse: Value orientations. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli, (ed.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice. London: Pinter. 82–194.

Lenk, Uta (1998). Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

Lerner, Gene H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20(3): 441–458.

Lerner, Gene H. (1996). On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson, (ed.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 238–276.

Lerner, Gene H. (1996). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: 'Second person' reference in multi-party conversation. Pragmatics 6(3): 281–294.

Lerner, Gene H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society 32(2): 177–201.

Linell, Per (1995). Troubles with mutualities: Towards a dialogical theory of misunderstanding and miscommunication. In Ivana Marková, Carl F. Graumann & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 176–213.

Linell, Per (1998). Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Linell, Per & Luckmann, Thomas (1991). Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In Ivana Marková & Klaus Foppa, (ed.), Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1–20.

Lucy, John, ed. (1993). Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lutz, Catherine A. (1988). Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a


Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Lutz, Catherine A. & Abu-Lughod, Lila, ed. (1990). Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Macken-Horarik, Mary (2003). APPRAISAL and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text 23(2): 285–312.

Macken-Horarik, Mary (2003). Envoi: Intractable issues in appraisal analysis? Text 23(2): 313–319.

Macken-Horarik, Mary & Martin, J. R. (2003). Text. Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation.

Mandelbaum, Jenny (1989). Interpersonal activities in conversational storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 114–126.

Mandelbaum, Jenny (1993). Assigning responsibility in conversational storytelling: The interactional construction of reality. Text 13(2): 247–266.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 142–175.

Martin, J. R. (2003). Introduction. Text 23(2): 171–181.

Matoesian, Gregory M. (1999). The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society 28(4): 491–521.

Maynard, Douglas W. (1991). The perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, (ed.), Talk and Social Structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 164–194.

Maynard, Senko (1993). Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Maynard, Senko K. (1991). Pragmatics of discourse modality: A case of the Japanese emotional adverb doose. Pragmatics 1(3): 371–392.

McNeill, David (1992). Hand and Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

McNeill, David (2000). Analogic/Analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2): 43–60.

McNeill, David, ed. (2000). Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Medin, Douglas L., Goldstone, Robert L. & Gentner, Dedre (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review 100(2): 254–278.

Merritt, Marilyn (1994). Repetition in situated discourse – exploring its forms and


functions. In Barbara Johstone, (ed.), Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 23–36.

Mithun, Marianne (1991). Active/Agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67: 510–546.

Moerman, Michael (1993). Ariadne's thread and Indra's net: Reflections on ethnography, ethnicity, identity, culture, and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 85–98.

Mori, Junko (1999). Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese. Connective Expressions and Turn Construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Morita, Emi (2002). Stance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences: Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanese. In Noriko Akatsuka, Susan Strauss & Bernard Comrie, (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics. Vol. 10. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 220–233.

Morita, Emi (2003). The Japanese Interactional Particles ne and sa: An Analysis of Their Conditional Relevance for Conversation. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California.

Müller, Frank Ernst (1996). Affiliating and disaffiliating with continuers: Prosodic aspects of recipiency. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting, (ed.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 131–176.

Mushin, Ilana (1997). Maintaining epistemological stance: Direct speech and evidentiality in Macedonian. Chicago Linguistic Society 30: 296–308.

Mushin, Ilana (2001). Japanese reportive evidentiality and the pragmatics of retelling. Journal of Pragmatics 33(9): 1361–1390.

Mushin, Ilana (2001). Discourse Analysis: Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Myers Scotton, Carol (1983). The negotiation of identities in conversation: A theory of markedness and code choice. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 44: 116–136.

Niemelä, Maarit (2005 (forthcoming)). Voiced direct reported speech in conversational storytelling: Sequential patterns of stance taking. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18.

Nikula, Tarja (1996). Pragmatic Force Modifiers: A Study in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.

Norrick, Neal R. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text 7(3): 245–264.

Norrick, Neal R. (1994). Repetition as a conversational joking strategy. In Barbara Johnstone, (ed.), Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 15–28.


Norris, Sigrid (2002). The implication of visual research for discourse analysis: Transcription beyond language. Visual Communication 1(1): 97–121.

Nuyts, Jan (2001). Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 383–400.

Ochs, Elinor (1983). Evolving discourse – the next step. In Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin, (ed.), Acquiring Communicational Competence. London: Routledge. 40–49.

Ochs, Elinor (1986). From feelings to grammar: A Samoan case study. In Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin, (ed.), Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 251–272.

Ochs, Elinor (1988). Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor (1988). The linguistic expression of affect. In Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168–188.

Ochs, Elinor (1989). Text. The pragmatics of affect.

Ochs, Elinor (1992). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson, (ed.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 407–437.

Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi (1989). Language has a heart. Text 9(1): 7–25.

Ochs, Elinor, Schieffelin, Bambi & Platt, Martha (1979). Propositions accross utterances and speakers. In Elinor Ochs & Bambi Schieffelin, (ed.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press. 251–268.

Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In Richard A. Shweder & Robert A. LeVine, (ed.), Culture Theory. Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 276–320.

Ochs Keenan, Elinor (1977). Making it last: Repetition in children's discourse. In Susan Ervin-Tripp & Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, (ed.), Child Language. New York, NY: Academic Press. 125–138.

Ono, Tsuyoshi, Thompson, Sandra & Suzuki, Ryoko (2000). The pragmatic nature of the so-called subject marker ga in Japanese: Evidence from conversation. Discourse Studies 2(1): 55–84.

Page, Ruth E. (2003). An analysis of APPRAISAL in childbirth narratives with special consideration of gender and storytelling style. Text 23(2): 211–237.


Painter, Clare (2003). Developing attitude: An ontogenetic perspective on APPRAISAL. Text 23(2): 183–209.

Park, Yong-Yae (1998). A discourse analysis of contrastive connectives in English, Korean and Japanese conversation: With special reference to the context of dispreferred responses. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv, (ed.), Discourse Markers. Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 277–300.

Pennycook, Alastair (1994). Incommensurable discourses? Applied Linguistics 15(2): 115–138.

Peräkylä, Anssi & Silverman, David (1991). Owning experience: Describing the experience of other persons. Text 11(3): 441–480.

Pomerantz, Anita (1980). Telling my side: 'Limited access' as a 'fishing' device. Sociological Inquiry 50: 186–198.

Pomerantz, Anita (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage, (ed.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57–101.

Pomerantz, Anita (2004). Investigating reported absences: 'Neutrally' catching the truants. In Gene Lerner, (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–129.

Potter, Jonathan (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative processes. European Review of Social Psychology 9: 233–266.

Potter, Jonathan & Hepburn, Alexa (2003). “I’m a bit concerned”—Early actions and psychological constructions in a child protection helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(3): 197–240.

Precht, Kristen (2003). Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation. Text 23(2): 239–257.

Rauniomaa, Mirka (forthcoming). Stance markers in spoken Finnish: minun mielestä and minusta in assessments. In Robert Englebretson, (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Raymond, Geoffrey (2000). The Structure of Responding: Type-Conforming and Nonconforming Responses to Yes/No Type Interrogatives. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California.

Rouchota, Villy (1998). Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv, (ed.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97–126.

Sacks, Harvey (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling. In Richard Bauman & Joel Sherzer, (ed.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press. 337–353.


Sacks, Harvey (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee, (ed.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 54–69.

Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation [1964-1968]. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation [1968-1972]. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Sacks, Harvey & Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In George Psathas, (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers. 15–21.

Sandlund, Erica (2004). Feeling by Doing: The Social Organization of Everyday Emotions in Academic Talk-in-Interaction. Doctoral Dissertation. Karlstad University.

Sapir, Edward (1994). The unconscious patterning of behavior in society. In Ben G. Blount, (ed.), Language, Culture, and Society. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press. 29–42.

Sarangi, Srikant (2003). Editorial: Evaluating evaluative language. Text 23(2): 165–170.

Schegloff, Emanuel A (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In Deborah Tannen, (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 71–93.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1984). On some gestures' relation to talk. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage, (ed.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 266–296.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1986). The routine as an achievement. Human Studies 9: 111–151.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In Jeffrey Alexanderet al., (ed.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 207–234.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 25: 201–218.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in-interaction. In Bruce Dorval, (ed.), Conversational Organization and Its Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 51–77.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, (ed.), Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press. 44–70.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Confirming allusions: An empirical account of action.


American Journal of Sociology 102(1): 161–216.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. In Eduard H. Hovy & Donia Scott, (ed.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account. Heidelberg: Springer. 3–38.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction. In Barbara A. Fox, (ed.), Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 437–485.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8(2): 165–187.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research 65(3): 535–595.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999). What next?: Language and social interaction study at the century's turn. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32(1–2): 141–148.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29(1): 1–63.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2000). On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 715–720.

Scheibman, Joanne (2000). I dunno ... A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1): 105–124.

Scheibman, Joanne (2001). Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper, (ed.), Frequency Effects and Emergent Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 61–89.

Scheibman, Joanne (2002). Point of View and Grammar: Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Schenkein, Jim (1978). Identity negotiations in conversation. In Jim Schenkein, (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York, NY: Academic Press. 57–78.

Schiffrin, Deborah (1980). Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry 50: 199–236.

Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schütze-Coburn, Stephan (1992). Prosodic phrase as a prototype. In Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania. 171–180.

Schütze-Coburn, Stephan, Shapley, Marian & Weber, Elizabeth G. (1991). Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language


and Speech 34: 207–234.

Selting, Margret (1994). Emphatic speech style – with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 375–408.

Selting, Margret (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics 6(3): 357–388.

Selting, Margret (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 29(4): 477–517.

Shi-xu (2000). Opinion discourse: Investigating the paradoxical nature of the text and talk of opinions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(3): 263–289.

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1992). Contextual conditions for the interpretation of poder and deber in Spanish. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman, (ed.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 67–105.

Silverstein, Michael (1977). Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In Muriel Saville-Troike, (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 139–151.

Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie (1992). The interactional utility of of course in spoken discourse. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 6: 213–226.

Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie (1996). Image-building through modality: The case of political interviews. Discourse & Society 7(3): 389–415.

Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie (2000). The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1): 41–62.

Simpson, JoEllen M. (1994). Regularized intonation in conversational repetition. In Barbara Johnstone, (ed.), Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 41–49.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (1996). Repeats and responses in Finnish conversation. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson, (ed.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 277–327.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2001). Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Speer, Susan A. & Potter, Jonathan (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse & Society 11(4): 543–572.

Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1988). Echoic utterances and irony. In Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 237–243.

Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan, ed. (1995). Subjectivity and Subjectivisation:


Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stivers, Tanya & Heritage, John (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering "more than the question" during comprehensive history taking. Text 21(1–2): 151–185.

Strauss, Susan & Kawanishi, Yumiko (1996). Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American. In Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki & Susan Strauss, (ed.), Japanese-Korean Linguistics. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 149–165.

Streeck, Jürgen (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs 60: 275–299.

Streeck, Jürgen (1995). On projection. In Esther N. Goody, (ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 87–110.

Streeck, Jürgen & Hartge, Ulrike (1992). Previews: Gestures at the transition place. In Peter Auer & di Aldo Luzo, (ed.), The Contextualisation of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 135–158.

Streeck, Jürgen & Knapp, Mark L. (1992). The interaction of visual and verbal features in human communication. In Fernando Poyatos, (ed.), Advances in Nonverbal Communication: Sociocultural, Clinical, Esthetic and Literary Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–23.

Stubbs, Michael (1986). A matter of prolonged field work: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics 7(1): 1–25.

Sudnow, David N. (1972). Studies in Social Interaction. New York, NY: Free Press.

Suzuki, Ryoko (1990). The role of particles in Japanese gossip. Berkeley Linguistics Society 16: 315–324.

Swigart, Leigh (2000). The limits of legitimacy: Language ideology and shift in contemporary Senegal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1): 90–130.

Szczepek, Beatrice (2000). Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 21.

Szczepek, Beatrice (2001). Prosodic orientation in spoken interaction. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 27.

Tainio, Liisa (1997). Mä muistan ... mä en muista. Muisteluvuoroista arkikeskustelussa [I remember... I don't remember. On remembering turns in everyday conversation]. In Katarina Eskola & Eeva Peltonen, (ed.), Aina uusi muisto: Kirjoituksia menneen elämästä meissä. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. 289–317.

Takanashi, Hiroko (2000). Stance differential in parallelism: Dialogic syntax of argumentation in Japanese. In Enikö Németh, (ed.), Pragmatics in 2000: Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. 2. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. 570–582.


Tannen, Deborah (1987). Repetition in conversation as spontaneous formulaicity. Text 7(3): 215–243.

Tannen, Deborah (1987). Repetition and variation as spontaneous formulaicity in conversation. Language 63: 574–605.

Tannen, Deborah (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tannen, Deborah, ed. (1993). Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tao, Hongyin (2001). Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. In Rita C. Simpson & John M. Swales, (ed.), Corpus Linguistics in North America. Selections from the 1999 Symposium. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 116–144.

Thompson, Ewan (2001). Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(5–7): 1–32.

Thompson, Geoff (1996). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Thompson, Geoff (1998). Resonance in text. In Antonio Sánchez-Macarro & Ronald Carter, (ed.), Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 29–46.

Thompson, Geoff & Hunston, Susan (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–27.

Thompson, Geoff & Zhou, Jianglin (2000). Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, (ed.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 121–141.

Thompson, Sandra A. (2002). 'Object complements' and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–163.

Thompson, Sandra A. (2003). Functional grammar. In William Frawley, (ed.), Oxford International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, Sandra A. & Hopper, Paul J. (2001). Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper, (ed.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 27–60.

Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony (1991). A quantitative perspective on the grammaticisation of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth Clauss Traugott & Bernd Heine, (ed.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 313–329.

Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony (1991). The discourse conditions for the


use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–251.

Tomasello, Michael (1998). Introduction: A cognitive-functional perspective on language structure. In Michael Tomasello, (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 1. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. vii–xxiii.

Tomasello, Michael (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambrigde, MA: Harvard University Press.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright, (ed.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 31–54.

Tsui, Amy B. M. (1991). The pragmatic functions of I don't know. Text 11(4): 607–622.

Turnbull, William & Saxton, Karen L. (1997). Modal expressions as facework in refusals to comply with requests: I think I should say 'no' right now. Journal of Pragmatics 27(2): 145–181.

Vesala, Kari Mikko & Rantanen, Teemu, ed. (to appear). Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa. [Argumentation and interpretation. An approach to qualitative stance research].

Voloshinov, Valentin Nikolaevich (1973 [1930]). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Watson, Greg (1999). Evidentiality and affect: A quantitative approach. Language and Literature 8(3): 217–240.

Watson-Gegeo, Karen Ann & White, Geoffrey M. (1990). Disentangling: Conflict Discourse in Pacific Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Weber, Elizabeth G. & Bentivoglio, Paola (1991). Verbs of cognition in spoken Spanish: A discourse profile. In Suzanne Fleischman & Linda R. Waugh, (ed.), Discourse-Pragmatics and the Verb. The Evidence from Romance. London: Routledge. 194–213.

Weber, Tilo (1997). The emergence of linguistic structure: Paul Hopper's emergent grammar hypothesis revisited. Language Sciences 19(2): 177–196.

Wells, Bill & Macfarlane, Sarah (1998). Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech 41(3–4): 265–294.

Wetherell, Margaret (1998). Positioning and interpreting repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism. Discourse & Society 9(3): 387–412.

Whalen, Jack & Zimmerman, Don H. (1998). Observations on the display and


management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of 'hysteria' in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly 61(2): 141–159.

Whalen, Marilyn & Zimmerman, Don H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 172–185.

Whalen, Marilyn & Zimmerman, Don H. (1990). Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society 19: 465–492.

White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23(2): 259–284.

Willet, Thomas (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97.

Wilson, Thomas P. (1991). Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman, (ed.), Talk and Social Structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Winter, Eugene O. (1982). Towards a Contextual Grammar of English: The Clause and Its Place in the Definition of Sentence. London: Allen & Unwin.

Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele, ed. (2002). New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Wong, Jean (2000). Repetition in conversation: A look at "first and second sayings". Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 407–424.

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004). Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Zimmerman, Don & Boden, Deirdre (1991). Structure in action: An introduction. In Deirdre Boden & Don Zimmerman, (ed.), Talk and Social Structure. Oxford: Polity Press. 3–21.

Zimmerman, Don H. (1992). The interactional organization of call for emergency assistance. In Paul Drew & John Heritage, (ed.), Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 418–469.

Zimmerman, Don H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe, (ed.), Identities in Talk. London: Sage. 87–106.

stance Page 1 - University of Oulu · PDF filestance_ Page 1 Abraham, Werner, ... Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154

Documents