Top Banner
Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway
23

Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Jan 19, 2016

Download

Documents

Scot Montgomery
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work

Programmes

Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway

Page 2: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Session Format

• Plan ‘A’ was to ask you to vote using handsets.• Today we are using plan ‘B’!• Ask you to discuss in tables and give feedback.• Results used to inform priorities over next 3

years.• Feedback given via regional networks and

newsletters.

Page 3: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Structure

• 3 Sections• Career Framework• Building organisational capability in workforce

planning and modernisation• The Evidence Base• Each table will be asked to look at one section

(15 mins)• Results collated and fedback.

Page 4: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Assumptions

• Respond thinking about your organisation or give your opinion.

• Think about next 3 years• No right or wrong answers • Your views• 8 Facilitators available • Give a consensus in tables

Page 5: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Should the development of Assistant /Associate Practitioner roles continue to be a focus?

1. Yes, these are a priority.2. No, these are mainstream.3. Partly, but equal weight given to other

priorities.

Page 6: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Should the development of Advanced Practitioner roles continue to be a focus?

1. Yes, these are a priority.2. No, these are mainstream.3. Partly, but equal weight given to other

priorities.

Page 7: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

How should the issue of regulation for APs move forward?

1. Wait until there is a national decision2. Interim, regional approach, employer

led, voluntary register3. Lack of regulation not a barrier to

developing the role.

Page 8: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

How should the issue of regulation for Advanced Practitioners move forward?

1. Wait until there is a national decision2. Interim, regional approach, employer

led, voluntary register3. Lack of regulation not a barrier to

developing the role.

Page 9: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Where in the Career Framework are your main Workforce Challenges?

1. Bands 1 - 32. Band 43. Band 54. Band 65. Band 7 6. Band 8a/b7. Band 8 c/d8. Band 9

Page 10: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Modernising Scientific Careers (MSC) is a national priority. How will it affect your workforce?

1. We have begun to look at the impact it will have.

2. We know it will have an impact but not sure what this will be.

3. We are aware of it but would like to know more.

4. We don’t have any scientific roles.

Page 11: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

End of section 1

Page 12: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Is there still work to be done around raising awareness of AP/AdP roles?

1. Yes, still a need to raise awareness2. No need to raise awareness3. No, current focus is on embedding roles

and maximising benefits.

Page 13: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

How has your organisation benefitted most from the regional Workforce Modernisation Network?  1. Seeing how new roles operate elsewhere2. Sharing blockages3. Sharing strategy/approach 4. Debating issues5. Understanding the processes6. Developing knowledge/expertise

Page 14: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

There have been a number of outputs from the networks, which has been most valuable for your organisation?

1.Guidance / policy documents2.Task and finish group work3. Showcasing events 4. Joint meetings with planners5. Topical guest speakers

Page 15: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Which of the following would you like to see more of from the WM Hub?1. Workshops and master classes2. Short webinars3. Showcasing events, sharing practice

across the region4. Focussed work around

specialities/pathways5. Policy and Guidance

Page 16: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Would you like to see the work of the NW WM Hub focused around particular clinical pathways?

1. Yes2. No, pathway work is not my

preference3. Yes, particularly cross organisation

working

Page 17: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Which of the following would you most like help with to meet QIPP challenges?

1. Service redesign2. Approaches to workforce planning3. Skill mix review4. Role redesign

Page 18: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Should the NW WM Hub continue to address clinical/direct care roles only?

1. Yes2. No, it should incorporate support

services3. No, it should incorporate medical

roles4. No, it should incorporate all

health and social care roles

Page 19: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

End of Section 2

Page 20: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

There is a range of evidence to support implementing new roles. Which is most useful?

1. Knowledge management and benchmarking data (eWIN)

2. Evaluation reports3. Case Studies4. Journal articles

Page 21: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Which additional things would you value most?

1. Consensus events2. Benefits realisation framework3. Senior Managers Briefings4. Newsletters/bulletins/fact sheets5. Webex based resources

Page 22: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

What is the biggest barrier to collecting evidence and assessing impact for your own internal evaluation?

1. Identifying baseline information2. Knowing what to measure/audit3. Don’t see the need to audit4. Isolating the impact of the new

role in a team environment

Page 23: Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway.

Would you welcome further support with work based learning?

1. Yes2. Yes, including stronger partnership

working3. Yes, around assessment of competency4. Yes, around mentor preparation5. No, thank you