Staffordshire & Stoke on Trent Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub

Staffordshire & Stoke on TrentMulti-Agency Safeguarding Hub

John MaddoxMASH Development Officer

Information Sharing in action

Your Speaker today and the dark arts !!

WHY ?

• Why do we need MASH in Staffordshire

• The Evidence was clear and difficult..we lost children

• BSK410 & NS10

• Sharing more information.

• Undertaking Early Risk Assessment

• A ‘whole family’ approach to safeguarding.

• Enhanced data sharing and analysis to join up the information available about a family to support and/or intervene to protect the vulnerable.

• Creating a confidential environment where proportionality necessity & justification allow information to be released to operational staff.

Concept

• Who is in MASH

• Staffordshire County Council Children & Adults• Staffordshire Police• Staffs & Stoke NHS Partnership Trust• Stoke on Trent City Council Children & Adults• SWMPT (MAPPA)• North Staffs Combined Mental Health (maybe)

• Culture• Fear • Knowledge• Ignorance• The law• Doing what we have always done• Not my responsibility

The Challenges

• Having a face to face process• Creating a Confidential Environment• An agreed MOU• Right level of decision maker• Professionally Disagree• Applied Multi agency thinking• Professional judgement• Trust & Confidence

Solutions

• Builds on existing agreements• Two stage process – Reveal & Disclose• Audit Process• Have a legal basis• Handling Protocols & info ownership• Escalation process

MOU

• Governance

Essential Elements

Draft Governance Structure (initial 12 months of operation) v2 (9th Jan 2012)

MASH

Staffordshire Police (PVP)

Staffordshire County Council (SCC) First Response (FR) Emergency Duty Service

(EDS) Adult Protection (AP)

FORTNIGHTLY TACTICAL GROUP

QUARTERLY STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GP

Stoke City Council (StCC)

Adult Protection

Child Protection (CP)

MASH LEADERSHIP GROUP

MONTHLY STAFF FORUM / BUILDING USER GROUP

COMMISSIONERS

Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Adult Safeguarding

Partnership

Staffordshire Local Children’s Safeguarding Board

Stoke-on-Trent Local Children’s Safeguarding

Partnership

SSOTP

Safeguarding Children

Head of Families First (Chair), Chief Operating Officer (SSOTP), DSupt (Police), Strategic Manager (StCC Adults), County Commissioner (SCC Adult Safeguarding), AD (StCC Children Services), Strategic Lead (SCC Safeguarding), Head of Responsive Services (SCC), Mash Development Officer (SCC).

Head of Responsive Services (SCC Chair), MASH Development Officer (SCC), TM (SCC SAPIT), Operational Staff (StCC adults & Children), Head of Children Safeguarding (SSOTP), DI (Police), DCI (Police), TM First Response (SCC) TM EDS (SCC).

Designated Agency Representatives

Cohorts/Populations:-High Risk Children referrals (Safeguarding & above) Vulnerable Adult (No secrets) referrals Domestic Abuse-Victims & Perpetrators and repeat cases Domestic Violence screening for Children & Vulnerable Adults Missing persons Child Sexual Exploitation Hate Crime Some Professional Concern cases (issues raised by professionals but not clear as to the cohort at referral stage)

SO WHAT !!

More referral's equals more information sharing

More Information Sharing equals more opportunity for Safeguarding

More Safeguarding means opportunity for early intervention

Early intervention means less need acute services

More discussions mean better decisions about who should attend

• (February & March 2013)• Total throughput = 6723• MASHED = 1919 (as of 21/05/13= 3851)

• Equals = 29% info sharing• 41% Domestic Abuse• 36% Children• 10% Adults• 4% Child Sexual Exploitation• 9% other cohorts

Performance

• What impact re Risks• Exit severities following Mashing :• From Single agency assessment incoming to output by MASH

• 66% Unchanged• 27% Raised• 7% Lowered

• Re referral rate = 5.2%

• Prepare for change

• How to eat an elephant – one piece at a time ;Gradual introduction of cohorts of cases Design of the physical change of

information sharing

Things to watch out for

We view full information sharing as a compliment to already established systems.

Introducing a wave of multiagency demand through a single point of information sharing is likely to result in a monumental bottle neck.

It’s worth it

• Questions