7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
1/24
STABILIZATION OF SUBGRADE BY USING FLY ASH RELATED TO ROAD
PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN AT JALAN JAYA
GAD NG
MOHD ASHRAF BIN MOHD USSIN
A reported subm itted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the
degree of Bachelor of Clvii Engineering
Faculty of Civil Engineering Earth Resources
Universiti Malaysia Pahang
DECEMBER 2010
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
2/24
A B S T R A C T
Th is project aims to study the effectiveness of adding fly ash by percentage to the
subgrade with increasing the C alifornia Bearing Ratio (C B R ) value. The fly ash will
be added to the plain soil (subgrade) by using 4 and 8 fly ash and tested by
following ASSHTO as guidance steps. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) is a
commonly used directly as to assess the stiffness modulus and shear strength of
subgrade in pavement design work. If the CB R value is increasing by adding the fly
ash to the soil
it s shown its effectiveness in increasing soil strength and vice versa
Overall, when California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value increases, the thickness of
pavement design can be reduced and subsequently the road construction of the
affected road section will be more econom ically.
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
3/24
T BLE OF CONTENTS
CH PTER
ITLE
P GE
DECL R TION
DEDIC TION
CKNOW LEDGEM ENTS
v
BSTR CT
v
T BLE OF CONTENT
v
LIST OF T BLES
x
LIST OF FIGURES
x
LIST OF SYMBO LS
x
LIST OF PPENDICES xiii
NTRODUCTION
1 1 INTRODUCTION
1 2 Problem Statement
1 3 Objectives Of The Study
1 4 Scope Of Study
A
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
4/24
2
L I T E R A T U R E R E V I E W
2 .1
Introduction
7
2.1 .1
oil properties
7
2 .1 .2
ddit ives
9
2.1 .3
ly Ash
9
2 .1 .4
tabilization
2 1 5
odification
2 .1 .6
echanical Stabilization
2 .1 .7
dditive Stabilization
2
2 .2 Soil classification
2
2 .3
Soil Engineering P ropert ies
3
2.3 .1
t terberg Limits
3
2.3 .2
oisture C ontent
5
2 .3 .3
he L iqu id L imi t
6
2.3 .4
he Plast ic Limit
6
2 .4
Soil
onsisten y
17
2 .5
Soil Strength
8
R E S E A RC H M E T H O D O L O G Y
3.1 Genera l
2 1
3 .2
Flow Char t
2 2
3.3
Summ ary fo r Ma te ria l & Equipment
2 3
3 .4
Labora tory Test
2 4
3.4.1
oisture Content
2 5
3.4 .2
he Liquid Lim it of Soil
2 6
3.4 .1
he Plast ic Limit of Soil
2 8
3.4 .4
article Size Analysis
3
3 4 5
tandard Proctor Test
3 2
3.4 .6
he California Bearing Ratio (CBR )
3 3
v i i
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
5/24
V
ESULT AND ANALY SIS
4.1
ntroduction
3 5
4 .2
aboratory test results
3 6
4424 1 Moisture content
3 6
4.2.2 Particle size analysis
3 6
4 23
Atterberg limIt
4.2.3.1 L iquid limit
4 1
4232 Plastic limit
4 2
4.2.3.3 Plastic Index
4 3
4.2,4
tandard proctor test
4 4
4 5
alifornia bearing ratio CBR )
4 7
4 .3
umm ary of Pavement Design
5 4
4 .4
osting of T hickness Design
56
O NC LUS I O N AND REC O M M ENDAT I O NS
5 1 Conclusion
7
5 2 Recommendations
8
REFEREN ES Appendices Ant
8 7 .
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
6/24
LIST
O
TABLES
T A B L E
NO
TITLE
P A G E
3 .1
M ateria l and equipm ent for soi l tes t
2 3
4 .1
Sieve analysis data
3 7
4 .2
classif icat ion of soi l sample by A ASH TO
3 9
4 .3
Liquid Limit data
4 1
4 .4
Plastic limit data
4 2
4 5
Penetra t ion value of o riginal sample
4 8
4 .6
Value of CD R for original sample
4 8
4 .7
Penetra t ion value of 4 f ly ash
5
4 .8
Value of CD R for 4 f ly ash
50
4 .9
Penetra t ion value of 8 f ly ash
5
4 . 1 0
Value of CD R for 8 f ly ash
52
4 .11
Thickness layers each sample
4 . 12
Costing for 1km soil sample
56
i x
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
7/24
L I S T O F F I G U R E S
F IG U R E N O
T I T L E
P A G E
1 A
The damage of pavement
4
1 2
Site location
6
2 .1
Usa ge of fly ash at the construction site
1
2 .2
Atterberg Limit and soil volume relat ionship
1 4
2 ,3
The con sis tency s tate of soi l
1 7
2 .4
The soil core b eing s t ressed by com pressive, tensi le and
1 8
shearing
5
Graph for soi l s t rength index
2 0
3 4 1
Flow chart of methodology
2 2
3.2
The sam ple that need be inserted in the oven
2 5
3.3
Sample that be penet rated by cone penet rometer .
2 7
3 .4
The sam ples that have been rol led.
2 9
3 .5
The vibrator s ieve shaker
3
3.6
Mould for CBR test
3 4
4.1
Grain size distribution curve
3 8
4.2
The grain size distribution curve of fly ash
4 0
Penetrat ion of cone vsi m oisture content
4 3
4 .4
Com pact ion curve of the soi ls (original sample)
4 5
4.5
Com pact ion curve of the soi ls (4 f ly ash)
4 6
4 . 6 :
Com pact ion curve of the soi ls (8 f ly ash)
4 6
4.7
Graph
ad VS
Penetration for original
samp le
9
x
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
8/24
x i
4.8
raph Load VS Penetration for 4 additive fly ash
4.9
raph Load VS Penetration for 8 additive fly ash
4.10
ross section of flexible pavem ent
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
9/24
L I ST O F S Y M B O L S N D B B R E V I T I O N S
A A S H T O
A merican A ssociation of State H ighway and Transportat ion
Officials
A PT
Av erage daily traffic
ASTM
Am erican Society for Testing and Materials
C B R
California Bearing Ratio
C D
Consolidated drained
C U
Consolidated undrained
C U
Consolidated undrained with pore water pressure measurements
ef
equivalence factor
ESA L
Total Equ ivalent Standard Ax le Load
JK R
Jabatan Kerja }ya
L L
Liqu id limit
n
Design period (years)
Optimum moisture content
Pc
Percentage of commercial vehicles
P 1
Plastic index
PL
Plastic limit
r
Estimate the rate of annual traffic growth
SSA
Specific surface area
T
Equ ivalent thickness
U U
Unconsolidated undrained
V
he total number of comm ercial vehicles
V .
he initial yearly comm ercial vehicle traffic
Yd.max
aximum dry density
x l i
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
10/24
L I S T O F P P E N D I C E S
P P E N D I X
I T L E
G E
A
ata for mois ture content
Data for
ois ture correc t ion Factor
C
ata for Co mpact ion Test
D
ata for Cal ifornia Bear ing R atio (CBR ) tes t
8
E
ata for Calculat ion thickness design
4
xli
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
11/24
CHAPTER
INTRODUCTION
1 1 Background of Study
Fly ash is a by product of the pulverized coal combustion process usually
associated with electric pow er generating plants. Fly ash is a fine grained dust and is
primarily com posed of silica, alumina an d various ox ides and alkalies. It is pozzolanic in
nature and can react with hydrated lime to produces cementitious products. Braja
M.Das)
A certain type of fly ash is obtained from the burning of coal prelim inary from the
western United States to as Type C fly ash. It contains a fairly large proportion of free
lime that, with the addition of water, will react with other fly ash com poun ds to form
cem entatious products. This m ay eliminate the need to add m anufactured lime. (Braja
M.Das)
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
12/24
The soil stabilization is the alteration of soil properties to impro ve the eng ineering
performance of soils. The properties most often altered are density water content
plasticity and strength. Modification of soil properties is the temp orary enha ncem ent of
sub g rade stability to ex pedite construction.
Fly ash can be an binder for stabilizing soils for highway bases
Howe ver , limi ted informa t ion exists on the reuse of high carbo n off-spec f ly ash in
construction of highway pavem ents. This is particularly important when h igh carbon fly
ash is non-cem entit ious and calcium -rich activators are required to generate p ozzolanic
react ions. Thus, there is a need to ev aluate the s t rength and st i f fness of base layers
stabilized with high carbon fly ash.
Fly ash can be used to stabilize bases or subgrades, to stabilize backfill to reduce
lateral earth pressures and to stabilize em bankm ents to impro ve slope stabili ty. Fly ash
has been used successful ly in m any projects to improve the s trength character is tics of
soils. Typical stabilized soil depths are 15 to 46 centimeters 6 to 18 inches). The primary
reason fly ash is used in soil s tabilization ap plications is to improve the com pressive and
shearing strength of soils.
For fly ash stab il ization, the selection of a m ixture of soil , f ly ash, and water
usually depends on which one wou ld provide the intended geotechnical properties on a
short- term basis . The long-term perfo rma nce of fly ash stabilized soils in the context of
field environm ents after exposure to successive different weather cycles, such as wet dry
or freeze thaw cycles is often ignored. The effect of weathering cycles on natural soils
and soils stabilized with other cementitious materials such as lime and/or cement
suggests tha t the weathering act ion m ight have a pronou nced effect on the long-term
performan ce of fly ash stabilized soils.
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
13/24
1 2 Problem Statement
In Malaysia, road is an important form of com munication that connects to a
destination to other destination. In this study case, I referred at Jaya Gading road b ecause
the road condition was v ery bad and not satisfactory. Because of that, we can see many
accidents occur at Jaya Gading road.
Added the roads at Jaya Gading always have problems such as holes and damaged
on the roads and cracking pavement. Poor m aintenance of road such as potholes, water
ponding debris on the road edges, drains are not properly maintained, poor construction,
wrong design and poor road surface. Others, the consolidation of the soil also not good
and have settlement at certain soil, That s all factors can cause drivers to make surprise
manoeuvres and increase the risk of accident.
The poor condition of road could probably cause by the unstable sub g rade, The
engineering properties of sub grade need to b e taken into consideration as it influence the
ability of sub grade to resist force from the upper layer. The b ad condition of road at Jaya
G ading was the result from poor construction of the road. In site investigation of road, the
most important thing is in determination of the engineering properties of soil. In this case
study, the contractor need to confirm the soil classification in order to used the parameter
for design. Poor c lassification could be the problem of the b ad condition of road.
Commonly, the type of soil at Jaya G ading is soft soil. if the soil under the surface
layer is not good, then the upper layer will be brok en dow n. in any road in the world,
especially at Malaysia (Jaya G ading), the sub g rade layer is the critical part we m ust
obtain their strength so that there are not have any problems to the users.
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
14/24
In order to avoid the surfacing course from dam age easily, a good compaction for
obtaining opt imu m m ois ture content OMC) should be done. OMC of a soil would
inf luence the pe rcentage value of California Bearing Ratio CBR). For this case study, i t
would come from a lower percentage value of CBR.
In other words, we must m ake sure that the soil under the road especially the sub
grade mu st be strong and available to use and if the so i l is not f lul f i ll of cri teria of the
JKR ro ad, we must upgrade the so il with some m ethod to m ake sure the soil is safe to be
use as road base.
.
-7
.. -. ---. --
. ,....................... .
- t
Figure 1.1:
the damage of pavement
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
15/24
1 3
bjectives of Study
The ob jectives of this study are;
i.
To identify the engineering properties of soil
ii.
To know the re la tionship between pe rcentage fly ash and CBR value.
iii.
To determ ine the thickness and costing of the pavement.
1 4 Scope Of Study
This s tudy i s done based on the spec i f ic s cope in o rde r to ensu re the prec i sion o f the
study area. Besides it is also done in order to achieve the objective of the study.
There fore, , its l imit has been spe cific to specific scopes which are:
i.
Site Location
Th e locat ion of the project s ite is l im ited for dist r ic t of Jaya lading roads
Several s i tes which involved in soil embankm ent in Kuantan are being vis ited.
ii.
Scope of work
In this project , sam ple are taken from the Jaya lading site and tested at the laboratory in
order to d etermine the e ngineering propert ies of the soi l samples, laboratory test ing such
as particle size distribution moisture content and atterberg limit will assessing the
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
16/24
characterist ic of the soi l samples Others laboratory test such as compaction and CB R are
important in determined the thickness of paveme nt
Figure 1 2:
Site location
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
17/24
CHAPTER
LITERATURE REVIEW
2 1 INTRODUCTION
2 1 1 Soil Properties
Naturally occurring ma terials that are used for the c onstruction of all except the
surface layers of pavem ents concrete and asphalt) and that are subject to classification
test AST M D 2487) to provide a general conce pt of their engineering characteristics.
Gordo n R Sullivan 1994)
Peop le describe soil types in all kind of w ays such as he avy, light, clay and loam,
poor or go od. Soil scientist describes soil type by how m uch sand , si lt and clay a re
Present. This is called texture. It is possible to change the texture by adding different
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
18/24
things. Changing texture ca n help in providing the right condition needed for plant
growth.
Sand is the largest particle in the soil. When y ou rub it, it feels rough. This is
because it has sharp edges. Sand doesn t hold m any nutrients. Silts are soil particle w hose
size is between sand and clay. Silt feels smooth and pow dery. When w et, it feels smooth
but not sticky.
Clay is the smallest of particles. Clay is sm ooth w hen dry and sticky w hen w et.
Soils high in clay content are called heavy soils. Clay also holds a lot of nutrients but
doesn t let air and w ater through it well.
Particle size has a lot to do w ith soils drainage and nutrients holding capacity. To
better understand how this big three soil, we can im agine that if a particle of sand w ere
the size of basketball, then silt w ould be the size of a baseball, and clay would be the size
of a golf ball. Line them up, and w e can see how these particle compare in size.
onstruction of roadways over soft subgrade is one of the most common
problems for highw ay construction in many parts of the w orld as w ell as in our country,
M alaysia. The usual approach to soft subgrade stabilization is to remove the soft soil, and
replace it with a stronger m aterial of crushed rock . The high cost of replacement has
caused highw ay agencies to evaluate alternative methods of highw ay construction on soft
subgrade.
O ne approach is to use fly ash to stabilize the soft sugared. The strength values of
the soil fly ash mixtures w ere evaluated to characterize the performance of stabilized soil
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
19/24
W
as a road subbase. Unconfined comp ression strength and California bearing ratio CB R)
tests were performed to determine the strength properties of the soil fly ash mixtures and
the optimum mixture contents for construction.
2 1 2 Additives
Manu factured com me rcial products that, wh en added to the soil in the proper
quantities, improv e some engineering characteristic, and plasticity Gordon R . Sullivian,
1994 ). Additives addressed in this manual are limited and only focus on the fly ash.
2 3 Fly Ash
Fly ash is one of the m ost plentiful and versa tile industrial by-prod ucts. It is
generated in large q uantities as a b y-product of burning co al at electric power plants;
Class C fly ash is usually recy cled as an en gineering material to take advantage of i ts
pozzo lanic characteristics.
his type of fly ash provides the opportunity for applications where other
activators would not be required. It offers more eco nomical alternatives for a w ide range
of soil stabilization ap plications. The potential for using fly ash in soil stabilization has
increased significantly in Malaysia due to increased av ailability and the introduction of
new environmental regulations that encourage the use of fly ash in geotechnical
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
20/24
1 0
applications w hen it is environmen tally safe. Results of various investigations showed
that soil stabilization with Class C fly ash without any other ac tivator is encouraging. The
improve d engineering properties of fly ash stabilized soil are also reported Edil et al.,
2000
200 2; Senol et aL 200 3; Turner, 1997)
Figure 2 1:
usage of fly ash at the construction site
Fly ash consists primarily of oxides of silicon aluminum iron and calcium.
Magnesium, potassium, sodium, titanium, and sulfur are also present to a lesser degree.
W hen used as a m ineral admixture in concrete, fly ash is classified as either Class C or
Class F ash based on its chemical com positions Fineness of fly ash is most closely related
to the operating condition of the coal crushers and the grind ability of the coal itself, A
coarser gradation can result in a less reactive ash and could contain higher carbon
contents. Limits on fineness are addressed by ASTM and state transportation department
specifications,
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
21/24
2 1 4 Stabilization
Stabilization is the proce ss of blending and m ixing with a soil to improve c ertain
properties of the soil. The process m ay include the blending o f soil to achieve a desired
gradation or the m ixing of com mercially available additives that ma y alter the gradation,
texture or plasticity, or act as a binder for cem entation of the soil. Gord on R. Sullivan,
1 9 9 4
2 1 5 M odification
Modification refers to the stabilization process that results in improvem ent in
some properties of the so il but thus not by de sign result in a significant increase in soil
and durability W illiam
Wildman, 1981)
21 6 Mech anical Stabilization
Mechanical stabilization is accomp lished by mixing or blending soil of two or
more gradations to obtain a m aterial meeting the required specification. The soil blending
may take place at the construction site, a central plant, or a borrow area. The blended
material is then spread and com pacted to required densities by the conve ntional means.
Gordon
R
Sullivan, 1994)
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
22/24
2
2 1 7
dditive Stabilization
Ad ditive stabilization is achieved b y the addition of proper percentag e of cemen t,
lime, fly ash, bitum en, or com bination of these m aterials to the soil. The selection of type
and determ ination of the percen tage of addit ive to be used is depending upo n the soil
classification and the deg ree of improvem ent in soil quality desired (Gordon R . Sullivan,
1994) .
Gen erally, smaller amounts of ad ditives are required whe n it is s imply d esired to
mo dify soil properties such as gradation, workab ility, and plasticity. W hen it is desired to
improve the strength and durability significantly, larger quantities of additives are used.
After the additive has been m ixed with the soil, spreading and comp action are achieved
by conventional means.
2 .2
oil Classification
Soil classification is a way of systematically categorizing soils according to their
probab le engineering c harac teristics. The c lassification of a soil is based on its particle
distribution and, if the soil isfine-grained, on its plasticity (LL an P1 ). The m ost widely
used classification systems used in road engineering are the unified soil classification
system, AASHTO classification and British Standard Classification. Soil classification
should only be regard ed as a m eans of obtaining a general idea of soil behavior and i t
should nev er be used as a su bstitute for detailed investigation of soil properties. (Richard
Robinson Bent Thagesen, 2004)
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
23/24
3
2.3
oil Engineering Prop erties
To hav e an understand ing of soil action, an engineer m ust be familiar with certain
basic soi l propert ies. We are al l fam iliar with the ba sic propert ies of o ther engineering
materials such as steel wood and concrete. A soil engineer must have familiar
know ledge relative to soil (Paul H. Wright/Karen K . Dixon, 2004).
2.3.1 Atterberg Limits
The liquid limit may be defined as the minimum m oisture content at which the
soil will flow u nder the a pplication of a very sma ll shear force. At this moisture content
the soil is assum ed to behave practically as a liquid. The plasticity limit ma y be defined
in general term as the minimu m m oisture content at which the soi l remains in a plast ic
cond ition. This lower lim it of plasticity is rather arbitrarily defined, and the plastic limit
ma y be further describe as the lowest mo isture content at wh ich the soil can be rolled
into a thread of 1/8 in. (3.2mm ) diameter w ithout crum bling. (Paul h. Wright/Karen k.
Dixon, 2004)
The plastic index P1)
of a soi l is defined as the num erical difference between
the liquid and plastic limits. It thus indicates the range of m oisture content over w hich the
soil is in a plastic condition. Sandy so il and silts, particularly those of the rock-flour type,
have ch aracteristically low PIs, wh ile clay soil show s high value of the plasticity index .
7/23/2019 Stabilization of Subgrade by Using Fly Ash
24/24
4
Ge nerally speaking, soils that are highly plastic as indicated by a high value of the
plasticity index are a lso highly
com pressible. It is also ev ident that the p last ic index is
measure of cohesiveness with a high value of the P1 indicating a high degree of
cohesion; So ils that do not have a plastic limits such as cohe sionless sands are repo rted as
being non plastic (NP). (Paul h, wright Karen k. Dixon 2004)
volum
Water on ten t
Figure 2 2:
Atterberg L imit and soil volume relationship