Neutrino Telescopy after the new developments in Particle and Astroparticle Physics Spyros Tzamarias School of Science and Technology Hellenic Open University
Jan 02, 2016
Neutrino Telescopy after the new developments
in Particle and Astroparticle Physics
Spyros TzamariasSchool of Science and Technology
Hellenic Open University
2
Sky view of a Mediterranean UnderSea Neutrino Telescope
>75%>25%
KM3NeT coverage of most of the sky (87%) including the Galactic Centre
FOV for up-going
neutrinos shown
From Mediterranean 24h per day visibility
up to declination d~-50°
KM3NeT consortium consists of 40 European institutes, including those in Antares, Nemo and Nestor, from 10 countries (Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Rumania, Spain, U.K)
KM3NeT is included in the ESFRI and ASPERA roadmaps KM3NeT Design Study (2006-2009) defined telescope design and outlined
main technological options Approved and funded under the 6° EU Frame Program Conceptual Design Report published in 2008 http://www.km3net.org/public.php Technical Design Report (TDR) completed => outline technology options for the
construction, deployment and maintenance of a deep sea neutrino telescope http://www.km3net.org/KM3NeT-TDR.pdf
KM3NeT Preparatory Phase (2008-2012) defines final design, production planes for the detector elements and infrastructure features. Prototype validationis under way. Legal, governance and funding aspects are also under study.
Scientific Standing Committee: External Scientific Evaluation Approved and funded by EU under the 7° EU Frame Program
4
General KM3NeT lay-out
Primary Junction box Secondary Junction boxes
Detection Units
Electro-optical cableOpticalModule (OM) = pressure resistant/tight sphere cointaining photo-multpliersDetection Unit (DU) = mechanical structure holding OMs, enviromenta lsensors,electronics,… DU is the building block of the telescope
5
Design Study TDR - Detection Unit and Optical Module Concepts
• Two different options for OMs and Dus reported in TDR
5
Flexible tower with horizontal bars equipped with large PMT OMs
Slender stringVertical sequence of multi-PMT OMs
•Preparatory Phase =>Convergence i.e. DU=Flexible tower, OM=Multi-PMT•Prototype and validation activities crucial for final choice• GOLDEN ROOL: Maximize the Discovery Potential
6
DOMBAR Prototype–Storey -
6 m
Mechanical Cable Connection
Rope & Cable Storage
Rope Storage
Bar Frame
Optical Module
Mechanical Interface
2 DOM + 1 BAR = 1 DOMBAR20 DOMBARS = DOMTOWER
The Vertical String Structure IS NOT ROOLED OUT
Fermi LAT Observation – Fermi Bubbles -
• From Meng Su, Tracy R. Slatyer, Douglas P. Finkbeiner Astrophys.J.724:1044-1082,2010
•Large extension (50°lat. 40° long.)• no spatial variation in the g spectrum
“We show below that a cosmic ray population can explain these structures” ………“…Finally, we predict that there should be a region of extended, TeV g radiation surrounding the Galactic nucleus on similar size scales to the GeV bubbles with an intensity up to E-2 Fg(TeV) ~10-9 TeV cm-1 s-1 sr-1 which should make an interesting target for future g-ray studies. Likewise, the region is a promising source for future, Northern Hemiphere, km3-volume neutrino telescope: we estimate (assuming a g=2.0 proton spectrum cut-off 1 PeV)….
The expected neutrino flux for one bubble is
E-2 Fn(TeV) ~ 10-6 GeV cm-1 s-1 sr-1 * 0.34 sr / 2.5 ~ 1.3 10-7 GeV cm-1 s-1
From M. Crocker and F. Haronian Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 101102
Gamma flux Single bubble solid angle
From g spectrum to n spectrum
Northd = -15°RA = 243°R =19°
Southd = -44°RA = 298°R =19°
Neutrino generation
homogeneous in a circular region around fixed points
one block of 154 DU
Rosa Coniglione
In Meng Su et al. bubbles are due to relativistic CR electrons that produce gamma through IC process
Galactic Candidate n Sources – SNRs -
Origin of CosmicRays SNR paradigm, VHE g but no conclusive evidence about CR acceleration
RXJ1713-39.43 and Vela JR best candidates
RXJ1713-39.43IF hadronic mechanisms => n spectrum can be calculated from VHE gspectrum ( solid redline Vissani)
Observation at 5 swithin about 5ys with KM3NeT
Hess RXJ1713-39.43
The spatial distribution of the photosensitive area is a critical parameter that affects the discovery potential of the telescope
NIM A 626-627 (2011) S188-S190
Detector Geometrical Layout
154 Towers or 77 TowersEach Tower consists of 20 bars, 6m in length and 40m apartOne MultiPMT OM at each end of the bar. 29% QE
Detectors Footprint
Use WISELY the whole Experimental Information
• Reconstruction Resolution on a track by track basis• Energy Estimation
z
x y
(θm, φm)
ψ
(θ, φ)
x *cos sinx *sin cos
tan2 2V * *
V * * V * *
U x x, y y
1
2V * * V * * V * *V * * 2 4 V * * 2
x
2 U x x
y2 U y y
P() 1
2 x y
2 x2 y
2 e
1
2
x2
x2 y
2
y2
dx dx
Psignal
angle ( x ,y ) 1
1 e
Rmax
sx2 sy
2
1
2 x y
e
1
2
x2
sx2 y
2
sy2
Pbck
angle ( x ,y ) 1
Reconstructed Energy (log of GeV)
0.5<cos(θ)<0.55
Psignal
energy (Em,m;) from MC
Pbckangle (Em ,m ) from MC
Discovery Potential (50% Discovery Probability)preliminary
3σThis Method: 1.2x 10-9 E-2 flux for 50% discoveryThis Method without Energy: 1.6x10-9
Binned method: >2.4x10-9
4σThis Method: 1.6x 10-9
This Method without Energy: 2.6x10-9
Atmosphericγ=2γ=1.8 (re-weighted))
Log(E/GeV)
L ,Ns i1
N total
Pi x ,y ,Em,m;,Ns
L0 Ns 0 i1
N total
Pi x ,y ,Em ,m;Ns 0
2sign( ˆ N s)lnL0 Ns 0
L ˆ , ˆ N s
Sign
al E
vent
s
Spectral Index
24 Signal Events on Top of Background 15 Signal Events on Top of Background
Spectral Index
Sign
al E
vent
s