Solving Today’s Sponsorship Problems
Sep 06, 2014
Solving Today’s Sponsorship Problems
OVERVIEW > Our Vision
To solve the problems between sponsors and nonprofits using online technology, while enhancing the sponsorship relationship among all stakeholders.
OVERVIEW > Our Strategy / Product
To solve the problems between sponsors and nonprofits using online technology, while enhancing the sponsorship relationship among all stakeholders.
Vision
Strategy
Product
?
?
Assumptions on Business Model Canvas (B.M.C.)
OVERVIEW > 1st Problem
2 Sided Market : Who’s First?
Sponsors First
Nonprofits First
OVERVIEW > 1st Solution
We chose Nonprofits!• Easier accessible• They need sponsorship
Yeah!!!
Target one side!
OVERVIEW > Our Classic B.M. Canvas
Our assumptions to help nonprofits with sponsorship
OVERVIEW > Our Classic B.M. Canvas
We believed - Brand visibility &- Logo management
were big issues with nonprofits.
OVERVIEW > OAP Focus
Determine market size/opportunity
Understand riskiest part of BMC
Create hypotheses based on risk
Test Hypotheses
1 2
34
Opportunity Analysis
The Plan
MARKET ANALYSIS >
MRKT ANALYSIS > Nonprofit Mrkt
1.6M Nonprofits in the US
$1.4Tr in Expenditure
in 2009
A lot of nonprofits & they spend a lot
MRKT ANALYSIS > Sponsorship Mrkt
Corporate Cause Spending (2011) - $1.6B
US Sponsorship Market (2011) - $18B
Global Sponsorship Market (2011) - $48B
Companies spend a lot on sponsorship!
MRKT ANALYSIS > Assumptions
What if…. • Nonprofits pay $5 to $25 per month for a solution
• 30% of nonprofits have website (480,000)
• 5% of those with websites purchase a solution (24,000)
MRKT ANALYSIS > Summary
$0
US Market Opportunity: $1.4M to $7.2M
Total US Market Size: $96M to $480M
US Corp Cause Spending: $1.8B
Revenue assumptions from nonprofits.
$$$$
MRKT ANALYSIS > Sponsor Corps
Any revenue from sponsor companies?
Coming soon to a PPT slide near you!After we complete nonprofit analysis
UNDERSTAND RISK >
UNDERSTAND RISK > ON B.M. Canvas
Value Prop is riskiest. Nothing else matters...
…until Value Prop is validated
UNDERSTAND RISK > ON B.M. Canvas
Create assumptions to test if nonprofits want a solution for:- Brand visibility &- Logo management
Next Step:
HYPOTHESIS ASSUMPTIONS >
HYPOTHESIS > Create Assumptions
(1) They are looking for sponsorship (2) they currently have sponsors (3) They will want Bar if it is free (4) They can install the bar (themselves or through developer) (5) They can add Bar to their Sponsorship Levels (6) They will add logos to the Bar (7) They will sell the bar to Sponsors (8) They are looking for creative ways (9) They will consider the pop-up as a form of advertising (10) They don't mind brands social advertising about other events on their site, once they get more sponsorship in return
UVP Assumptionsto create
HYPOTHESIS > Test Plan
(1) They are looking for sponsorship (2) they currently have sponsors (3) They will want Bar if it is free (4) They can install the bar (themselves or through developer) (5) They can add Bar to their Sponsorship Levels (6) They will add logos to the Bar (7) They will sell the bar to Sponsors (8) They are looking for creative ways (9) They will consider the pop-up as a form of advertising (10) They don't mind brands social advertising about other events on their site, once they get more sponsorship in return
Assumptions to create Interview Questions
Landing Page Testto create
TEST HYPOTHESIS ASSUMPTIONS >
TEST HYPOTHESIS > Location
27 nonprofits15 face-to-face Interviews
Customer Observation on landing page
TEST HYPOTHESIS > Learning (2 of 8)
The solution (and new value proposition) should address helping nonprofits with increasing & managing resources to get more sponsorship. Only 1 out 11 nonprofits said they would be interested in proposed solution immediately
The solution should take into consideration the ability to help nonprofits who have not started looking for sponsorship.
1
2
TEST HYPOTHESIS > Learning (4 of 8)
Nonprofits tend to look for sponsors in their value-chain and geographical location (impact zone).
Sponsors visibility was the highest importance to nonprofits, but it was never listed as problem. Therefore, the conclusion is - nonprofits believe they are giving sponsor companies the best visibility they can get.
3
4
TEST HYPOTHESIS > Learning (8 of 8)
The solution should should be compatible with wordpress plugin and drupal.
Logo management is not necessary.
The solution must not present the sponsor’s brand like an advertisement, and our value proposition should not include the word “advertising” in it.
The landing page does not clearly explain the solution and the benefit. It also does not address the nonprofits biggest challenges - no time & resources.
5
6
7
8
WHAT WE LEARNED >
LEARNING > Dig Deeper
- Our UVP Failed
LEARNING > Dig Deeper
- Our UVP Failed
- But we have not tested it with Sponsor Companies
LEARNING > Dig Deeper
- Our UVP Failed
- But we have not tested it with Sponsor Companies
- Were our interviews done right?
NEXT STEPS >
NEXT STEPS > Use Lean B.M. Canvas
Separate UVP into Problem & Solution Hypotheses
To test whether solution or problem failed.
NEXT STEPS > Test New Hypothesis
Test new UVP (and old UVP) through Solution / Problem Hypothesis
NEXT STEPS > Interview Process
Use Ash Maurya’s Interview Process
STILL Solving Today’s Sponsorship Problems
And continuing to OEP!