Top Banner
SPONDYLITIS TUBERCULOSIS vs PYOGENIC Dr. Tjuk Risantoso, SpB, SpOT(K)
40

Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Feb 23, 2023

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

SPONDYLITIS TUBERCULOSIS

vsPYOGENIC

Dr. Tjuk Risantoso, SpB, SpOT(K)

Page 2: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

OVERVIEWSPONDYLITIS TUBERCULOSIS PYOGENIC

EPIDEMIOLOGY increasing incidence of TB in United States due to increasing immunocompromised population583.000 cases per yearIndonesia is the 3rd most populous after China and India50% of osteoarticular TB.15% of extrapulmonary TB3-5% of all TB cases.More affects children and yound adults

2 - 4% all cases of “osteomyelitis”Rare: 1 in 250,000/yr but rising incidence Biphasic/bimodal ageMostly in elderlyMean age for childhood discitis is 7y.oThe second peak is ij 50 y.o

CLINICAL FEATURES

Chronic illnessMalaisenight sweatsweight loss back pain kyphotic deformityneurologic deficits (present in 10-47% of patients)

Acute onsetPain and focal tendernessFeverRoot symptoms/signsAbnormal neurologydeformity, muscle spasms, meningism, sinus, and unexplained septicaemia

ETIOLOGY Mycobacterium tuberculosisOther Mycobacterium sp. (rare)

Staphylococcus aureus (50%)Haemophillus influenzaEscherichia coli, Pseudomonas sp. Proteus sp. Streptococcus viridans

Page 3: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 4: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Pathoanatomy(Spondylitis TB)

Early infection •begins in the metaphysis of the vertebral body •spreads under the anterior longitudinal ligament and leads to

•contiguous multilevel involvement •skip lesion or noncontiguous segments (15%) •paraspinal abscess formation (50%)

•usually anterior and can be quite large (much more common in TB than pyogenic infections) 

•initially does not involve the disc space (distinguishes from pyogenic osteomyelitis, but can be misdiagnosed as a neoplastic lesion)

Page 5: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Pathogenesis(Spondylitis TB)

• Secondarily focus infection from the other organ hematogenically

• Small tubercle activate Chaperonin 10 high stimulator of bone resorption destructs anterior part of vertebrae body kyphotic deformity respiratory problem & paraplegia

• Granulomatous reaction blocks bone formation relatively avascular sequester

• Reach the soft tissue paravertebrae abscess following the fascia of psoas muscle psoas abscess ( cold abscess )

• Narrowing of adjacent disc ( being avascular )

Page 6: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Chronic infection leads to  •severe kyphosis

•because the infection is often diagnosed late, there is often much more severe kyphosis in granulomatous spinal infections compared to pyogenic infections

•sinus formation •Pott's paraplegia

•spinal cord injury can be caused by abscess/bony sequestra or meningomyelitis •abscess/bony sequestra has a better prognosis than meningomyelitis as the cause of spinal cord injury

Page 7: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 8: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 9: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Mycobaterium tuberculosis ingested by macrophage.

If it cannot be killed, then it will replicate inside the macrophage, and form the primary Focus of Ghon

Which is tubercle formed

Page 10: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

While the macrophage dying, the tubercle bacilli was released and form the caseous center make a colony surrounded by cellular imunity and live dormantly so called focus of Simon

When the immune system getting worse this focus will be activated

Page 11: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 12: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

DIVIDED INTO 5 STAGES:1.Implantation2.Early destruction3.Late destruction4.Neurological deficit5.Residual deformity

Page 13: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

CLASSIFY INTO:•DUE TO INFECTION SITES:1.Peridiscal2.Central3.Anterior4.Posterior (RARE)

Page 14: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Risk Factors for Pyogenic Infections

Page 15: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 16: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Laboratory FindingsTB

• Leukocyte >>>• ESR is prolonged• CRP (C-reactive protein )• ELISA ( false negative >> )• PCR (95% sensitivity and 93% accuracy)

• Tuberculin test ( Mantoux )

Page 17: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Immunology Test

• Intradermal tuberculin test ( Mantoux )

• 67,5 – 87,5 % positive

Page 18: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Biopsy

• Identification basil tuberkel definitive diagnosis acid stain, fluorokrome and Ziehl-Nielsen or culture

Page 19: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 20: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

IMAGING StudiesTB

early infection shows involvement of anterior vertebral body with sparing of the disc space

late infection shows disk space destruction, lucency and compression of adjacent vertebral bodies, and development of severe kyphosis

• PYOGENIC

Vertebral metaphyseal blurring (osteolysis)

• Loss of disc height• Endplate blurring• Subchondral reactive bone formation

• Bone destruction (and deformity)

• Soft-tissue shadows e.g.psoas abscess

Page 21: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

TB

PG

Page 22: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

T1= signalT2= signal Ring enhancementPYOGENIC

SPONDYLITIS

Page 23: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Ms. SA/F/20y.o/Spondylitis

TB

Page 24: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic
Page 25: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

TB Pyogenic

Page 26: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Epidural Abcess in Pyogenic Spondylitis

Page 27: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Abcess formation through the Petite Triangle

Page 28: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

CT-SCAN & MRI

CT-SCAN :• Calcification of soft tissue abscess

• Posterior element• Osteolytic lesion MRI :• Central necrosis (abscess)

• Inhomogen appearance

Page 29: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Histo - pathology

Granuloma and caseous appearance, Consists central zone granular and acidophilic which is circled by the epitheloid cell and Langhans giant cell with cluster of lymphosit at the outer margin of the granuloma.

Page 30: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Spinal InfectionsTreatment

Antibioticssensitivitiesadequate dose (iv then oral)ensure MBC reachedadequate duration (> 6 weeks)monitor response (clinical/ indices/ imaging)

toxicity profile and monitoring

Page 31: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Spinal InfectionsTreatment

Immobilisation– bed rest

– moulded orthoses (low thoracic / lumbar)

– halo-vest or orthosis (cervical / high thoracic)

Page 32: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Treatment for TB• The aim : eradicate the infection, stabilize the vertebrae & to correct the khypose

• The combination of chemotherapy or surgical therapy

• INH ( 5-15mg/KgBW/ day ) orally• Rifampicin ( 10-15mg/KgBW/day ) orally

• Pirazinamid ( 25-35/KgBW/day ) orally

• Ethambutol ( 15-20mg/KgBW/day ) orally

• Streptomycin ( 15-30mg/KgBW/day ) IV

Page 33: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Surgical TherapyThe indications :• Failed of chemotherapy treatment in 3 – 6 months

• Recurrent infection• Cervical segment abscess• Posterior lesion with abscess or sinus• Sequester formation• Vertebrae instability / progressive kyphosis

• Significant neurological deficit

Page 34: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Mrs.A/F/50y.o

BEFORE (IMPLANT FAILURE)

AFTER REVISION

Page 35: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Surgery Techniques

• Hongkong Methods ( anterior debridement & strut grafting )

• Anterior fusion ( Upadhay et al )• Anterior instrumentation & strut graft ( Yilmaz )

• Anterior bone graft & posterior osteotomy & arthrodesis

Anterior approach Posterior approachCostotransversectomy approach

Page 36: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

List of Problems:• Infection• Poor general condition• Multiple lesion• Cold abcess• Pain• Pathologic fracture• Instability• Neurological deficit• Deformity • Kyphus progression by

growth• Socioeconomic• Psychogenic• Cor• Lung

List of type of treatment:• Basic treatment:

- Anti TB drugs - Supportive treatment - External support (Plaster body jacket/ spica or brace ) - Bed rest - Abcess drainage

• Costotransversectomy• Thoracoscopic debridement• Anterior debridement and

strutgrafting ( Hongkong Method )• Anterior instrumentation• Posterior instrumentation• Transpedicular debridement and

biopsy• Translateral or posterior lumbar

interbody debridement and fusion• Shortening procedures for kyphus

correction• Rehabilitation

Total Treatment

Page 37: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

Treatments alternative:1. Basic tx only2. HK methode (AD, struthgrafting, plester body

jacket)3. Antor debride (AD), fussion(F) w/wo antor

instrmt (AI)4. AD, F + PI for nonrigid kyphotic (combined

approach: antor & postor approach)5. Alternative 4 for rigid kyphotic deformity6. PD (Costotransversectomy + laminectomy), PI +

Fussion for thoracal region7. PD (laminectomy), PI + Fussion (PLIF + TLIF)

for lumbal region8. PD (Transpedicular laminectomy), PI + Fussion

for upper thoracal (Th 2, 3, 4)

9. Alternative 7 + Circumferrential decompr for kyphotic curve

60o - 90o

10. Alternative 9 for kyphotic curve >90o w/wo shorthening &

distraction

Page 38: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

• Total treatment with 10 alternatives treat all existing problems in TB-Spine with the aim healing of the infection in stable and painless spine without unacceptable deformity with return of function, return to the society, family and occupation

Page 39: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic

• Total treatment is the most acceptable, comprehensive, rational and problem solving approach to the management of tuberculosis of the spine CURRENT TREATMENT

Page 40: Spondylitis TB vs Pyogenic