____________________________________________________ Spintronics --- Half metal and Colossal Magnetoresistance Jauyn Grace Lin Cener for Condensed Matter sciences National Taiwan Univsersity 2008/05/01
____________________________________________________
Spintronics --- Half metaland
Colossal Magnetoresistance
Jauyn Grace Lin
Cener for Condensed Matter sciencesNational Taiwan Univsersity
2008/05/01
____________________________________________________
Chapter One
Half Metal
____________________________________________________Outline
1. Definition of half metal2. Material classification3. Polarization measurement4. Applications
Half metals are the extreme case of strong ferromagnet, where not only 3d electrons are fully polarized, but also other (sp) down-spin bands do not crossthe Fermi level.(examples: NiMnSb, PtMnSb--- Hesuler phases.)
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 91 (2002)
Half-metallic ferromagnetism: Example of CrO2 (invited)J. M. D. Coey and M. Venkatesan
Physics Department, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
A half metal is a solid with an unusual electronic structure. For electrons of
one spin it is a metal with a Fermi surface, but for the opposite spin there is a
gap in the spin-polarized density of states, like a semiconductor or insulator.
This definition presupposes a magnetically ordered state to define the spin
quantization axis. The responses of a half metal to electric and magnetic field
at zero temperature are quite different. There is electric conductivity, but no
high-field magnetic susceptibility.
(CrO(CrO22,NiMnSb),NiMnSb)(Sr2FeMoO6)(Sr2FeMoO6)
(Magnetite)(Magnetite)(La(La0.70.7SrSr0.30.3MnOMnO66))
((GaAsMnGaAsMn))
(Tl(Tl22MnMn22OO77))(Doped (Doped EuOEuO & & EuSEuS))
FIG. 1. Schematic density of states for a half metal, (a) Type IA with only ↑ electrons at EF and (b) Type IB with only ↓ electrons at EF . In narrow d bands, the states at EF may be localized (type II).
FIG. 2. Schematic density of states for (a) a type IIIA half metal, whereelectrons of one spin direction are itinerant and the others are localized, (b)a semimetal, (c) a type IVA half metal, and (d), (e) two types of ferromagneticsemiconductor.
Definition of polarization Definition of polarization
νν: : fermifermi velocity of electronsvelocity of electrons
------ straightforwardstraightforward
------ real measurementreal measurement
FIG. 3. Comparison of five methods of measuring P: Photoemission, tunneljunction, point contact, Tedrow–Meservey experiment, Andreev reflection.
1.Photoemission1.Photoemission
2. 2. MagnMagn. Tunnel . Tunnel JuncJunc..
3. Point Contact3. Point Contact
4. 4. TedrowTedrow--MeserveyMeservey
5. 5. AndreevAndreev
FIG. 5. Spin polarization of the density of states of CrO2.
ΔΔSfSf : spin: spin--flip gapflip gap
FIG. 6. Resistivity of CrO2 thin films.
ρρoo= 4= 4××1010--88 ohmohm--mm~ 90 nm mean~ 90 nm mean--free pathfree path
ρρ = = ρρ oo TT22 ee--ΔΔ/T/T
with with ΔΔ ~ 80K~ 80K
FIG. 7. Magnetoresistance of a CrO2–Cr2O3 pressed powder compact, withtemperature dependence shown in the inset.
MRMR= [R(H)= [R(H)--R(0)]/R(0)R(0)]/R(0)= P= P22/(1+P/(1+P22))
a. Magneto-optical effectsLarge Kerr rotation in PtMnSb.
b. GMR applicationsSpin-valve system --- pick-up head, MRAM
c. Spin electronics--- Injection of polarized carriersi) The spin injection in a normal metal can give information on
the spin diffusion length in this metal.ii) Spin injection may act as a pair-breaking agent in a super-
conductor.iii) Half metals can also be used to build a spin transistoriv) Another possible application is as polarized tips in STM,
in order to visualize the orientation of magnetic domains.
Applications of Half metals
____________________________________________________
Chapter Two
Colossal Magnetoresistance
____________________________________________________Outline
1. Introduction2. Material3. Physical Properties4. Experiments
a. bulkb. film, bilayers
1. Introduction ---何謂電阻(率)
電阻 Rρ = R*A/w
ρ ρ ρ
T金屬 半導體 超導體
e-
____________________________________________________
Introduction ---物質的基本磁性
順磁
鐵磁
斜磁
反鐵磁
亞鐵磁
____________________________________________________
Introduction ---何謂磁阻
H = Ha
H = 0 大電阻
小電阻
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________Introduction --- 何謂龐磁阻(CMR)
1) Very high magnetoresistance(99% at Tp)
2) Polarization 100% (half metal)
3) M- I (F/AF) transition4) Phase separation5) Charge ordering6) Orbital ordering
S. Jin et al. Science 265 (1994)
MR =[ρ(H)-ρ(0)]/ρ(H=6 tesla )
Type MR Field Temp. Sample
OMR 0.01% ~Tesla RT Cu,Al
AMR 2 ﹪ 10 Oe RT Fe,Co,Ni
GMR 10 ﹪ 2 Oe RT Fe/Cr/Fe
CMR 10 (99)% ~Tesla RT(LT) La-Sr-Mn-O
TMR 40 ﹪ 10 Oe RT Co/AlO/Co
____________________________________________________MR ratio of MR ratio of spintronicspintronic materialsmaterials
c=7.77ÅLa,Sr
La, Sr
Mn+3
b=5.5Å
a=5.471Å
2. Material PerovskitePerovskite layered structurelayered structure
LaMnO3: Cubic (insulator,Antiferromagnetic)
(La,Sr)MnO3: orthorhombic
(Metal, Ferromagnetic)
(0.70 (0.70 Å))(1.32 (1.32 Å))(1.216 (1.216 Å))
____________________________________________________X X –– ray diffraction patternray diffraction pattern
Bragg condition:Bragg condition:
nnλλ = 2dsin= 2dsinθθ
20 30 40 50 60
x=0.3
x=0.25
x=0.2
x=0.15
x=0.1
x=0.05
x=0
(312
)
(114
)(1
31)
(040
)(2
20)
(202
)(0
22)
(021
)
(112
)
(111
)
(110
)
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)dd
____________________________________________________Phase diagrams of R1-xAxMnO3
degrees of freedom: charge, spin, orbital
What’s the new physics
____________________________________________________
3. Physical properties & mechanism
SP
O-2 t2g
eg
Mn+4: 3d3 (t2g3 eg0)Mn+3: 3d4 (t2g3 eg1)
t2g
ege- h+
____________________________________________________Double exchange (1951, Zener)
(La,Sr,)MnO3
Mechanism vs. degree of freedomMechanism vs. degree of freedom_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_
♣ FM/AFM superexchange♣ Charge/orbital ordering♣ double exchange♣ Lattice distortion
(John-Teller effect)
--- spin--- charge/orbital--- charge/spin--- lattice
Physical Review B, Volume 58, Number 17 1 November 1998-I Phase diagram of manganese oxide
Ryo Maezono, Surnio Ishihara, and Naoto NagaosaDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
__________________________________________________________________________________________
SonHundK HHHHH +++= site
ddtH jiij
ijK ')('
'σγσγ
σγγ
γγ +∑=
∑ ⋅−=i
ieitHHund gg SSJH 2
)~~( 2i
2site on iei gSTH αβ +−= ∑
jtij
itSS gg SSJH 22)(
⋅= ∑
(Kinetic energy of eg electrons)
(Hund coupling between eg & t2g spins)
(Coulomb interaction between eg-electrons)
(Super exchange t2g spins)
G
2D-F
A
1D-F
Charge Ordering (Mn+4/Mn+3 = n/8)
Chen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997)
(0.67~5/8)
(0.5=4/8)
Mn+3 Mn+4 Mn+4 Mn+3
Spin/orbital structure
Neutron diffractionNeutron diffractionMagnetic Magnetic DichroismDichroism
Nd1-xSrxMnO3
Kajimoto et al., PRB 30, 9506 (1999)
Tobe, PRB 67, 140402 (2003)
Orbital switching in A-type spin state
Spin A-Type :
from d3z2-r2 to dx2-y2
at TN ~ 220 K
Spin C-type :
remains d3z2-r2
with TN ~ 270 K
FMFM AFMAFM
Origin of CMR: Phase separationOrigin of CMR: Phase separation
M. Uehara, et all, Nature 399 (1999)M. Uehara, et all, Nature 399 (1999)
Metallic ClusterMetallic Cluster
AFM Melting as HAFM Melting as H≧≧1 Tesla (insulator)1 Tesla (insulator)
Spin line up (metal)Spin line up (metal)
4-a. Experiment --- bulk
Phase separation--- fine tuning the MR value by
Ionic radius size
____________________________________________________
Key parametersKey parameters_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_
• hole concentration(charge/orbital/spin)
• radius of A-site(lattice/ spin)
Mn3+ Mn4+
Mn3+
O2-
Mn4+
____________________________________________________Bulk MakingBulk Making
Step 1 Pre-heating R2O3: 900℃/ 3 h .
Step 2 Mix R2O3 ,CaCO3, SrCO3, MnCO3
Step 3 Reaction: 1200℃/ 24 h
Step 4 Pellet :d = 1 cm, Thickness =3 mm, 3 tons/ cm-2
Step 5 Anneal: 1400℃ /16 h
⇒⇒
____________________________________________________
0 – 7 Tesla1.4 – 400 KHall effectresisitivityAC susceptibility
Physical Property measurement System (PPMS)
T (K)T (K)M
(M
( em
uem
u ))
____________________________________________________Basic M Basic M –– T curveT curve
ParaPara-- to to antiferromagneticantiferromagnetic
TTcc
ParaPara-- to ferromagneticto ferromagneticM
(M
( em
uem
u ))
T (K)T (K)
TTNN
M ~ C/T , C/(T+TM ~ C/T , C/(T+TN N ), C/(T), C/(T--TcTc) )
T (K)T (K)
ρρ(o
hm(o
hm-- c
m)
cm)
T (K)T (K)ρρ
(ohm
(ohm
-- cm
)cm
)
____________________________________________________Basic R Basic R –– T curveT curve
metalmetal insulatorinsulator
ρρ = = ρρoo ++ρρ11TTαα ρρ = = ρρoo exp(C/Texp(C/Tββ))
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, VOLUME 65, 024422 (2001)Thermal and magnetic instability near the percolation threshold of
Nd0.5Ca0.5-ySryMnO3C. W. Chang,* A. K. Debnath,† and J. G. Lin‡
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 0
0
4
8
1 2
1 6
y = 0 .1
8 th ru n
1 s t ru n
ρ (o
hm-c
m)
T (K )
0
2
4
6
y = 0 .0 9
8 th ru n
1 s t ru n
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, VOLUME 65, 024422 (2001)Thermal and magnetic instability near the percolation threshold of
Nd0.5Ca0.5-ySryMnO3C. W. Chang,* A. K. Debnath,† and J. G. Lin‡
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 0
0
4
8
1 2
1 6
y = 0 .1
8 th ru n
1 s t ru n
ρ (o
hm-c
m)
T (K )
0
2
4
6
y = 0 .0 9
8 th ru n
1 s t ru n
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
H = 100Oe
T (K)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
H = 100Oe
y = 0.08
y = 0.1
25 50 75 100 125102
103
104
105
106
y = 0.08 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
ρ (o
hm-c
m)
T (K)
0 50 100 150 200 250 30010 -110 010 110 210 310 410 510 6
y = 0 .08
H = 0
H = 0 .5T
H = 1 .3Tρ (o
hm-c
m)
T (K )
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, VOLUME 65, 024422 (2001)Termal and magnetic instability near the percolation threshold of
Nd0.5Ca0.5-ySryMnO3C. W. Chang,* A. K. Debnath,† and J. G. Lin‡
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, VOLUME 65, 024422 (2001)Thermal and magnetic instability near the percolation threshold of
Nd0.5Ca0.5-ySryMnO3C. W. Chang,* A. K. Debnath,† and J. G. Lin‡
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
0 50 100 150 200101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108170K
150K
130K120K100K65K11K
ρ (o
hm-c
m)
T (K)
1. 3 Tesla1. 3 Tesla
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, VOLUME 65, 024422 (2001)Thermal and magnetic instability near the percolation threshold of
Nd0.5Ca0.5-ySryMnO3C. W. Chang,* A. K. Debnath,† and J. G. Lin‡
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
1 10 100 1000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
A
T (K)
50K
11K150K
130K80K
120K
100K
110K
Δρ/
ρ (%
)
Time (min)
0 100 200 300
Δρ/ρ = Α lnt+const.
J OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 90 (2001)Enhancement of magnetoresistance in the intermediate state
of Pr0.5Sr0.3Ca0.2MnO3C. W. Chang and J. G. Lin
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10764
FIG. 2. I –V curves for Pr0.5Sr0.3Ca0.2MnO3 at 120, 100, and 80 K, respectively.The arrows denote the jumps of voltage. The inset shows the temperaturedependence of the onset voltage of the jump with the forward scan(increasing ) and the backward scan (decreasing).
J OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 90 (2001)Enhancement of magnetoresistance in the intermediate state
of Pr0.5Sr0.3Ca0.2MnO3C. W. Chang and J. G. Lin
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10764
J OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 90 (2001)Enhancement of magnetoresistance in the intermediate state
of Pr0.5Sr0.3Ca0.2MnO3C. W. Chang and J. G. Lin
Center for Condensed Matter Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10764
FIG. 2. I –V curves for Pr0.5Sr0.3Ca0.2MnO3 at 120, 100, and 80 K, respectively.The arrows denote the jumps of voltage. The inset shows the temperaturedependence of the onset voltage of the jump with the forward scan(increasing ) and the backward scan (decreasing).
4-b. Experiment : films & bilayers
____________________________________________________
Subject (1): Nanocrystalline LSMO films--- High electroresistance
& low field MR effects
____________________________________________________
Experiment Flow ChartExperiment Flow Chart
Target preparation (Solid State ReactionSolid State Reaction)
Structure Analysis (XRDXRD)
Resistance
MorphologyMagnetism
Composition
EDSEDS
PPMS & SQUIDPPMS & SQUID
PPMSPPMS TEMTEM
Thin Film Deposition (Sputtering,PLDPLD)
Thin Film Charaterization
Nd0.7Ca0.3MnO3 (NCMO):
Nd2O3, CaCO3, MnCO3 Powder100°C (3 hrs.) in air 1100°C (24 hrs.) in air
YBaYBa22CuCu33OO77 (YBCO)
Y2O3, BaCO3, CuO2 Powder100°C (3 hrs.) in air 1050°C (36 hrs.) in oxygen400°C (12 hrs.) in oxygen
____________________________________________________
Solid state reaction
Target preparationTarget preparation
Powders
____________________________________________________RF sputter system (Millton CVT, 13.6 MHz)
10-8 torrfour guns1000 °C
Ar
LaAlO3 substrate
Reactive co-sputtering process
O2
LSMOYBCO
Film making
• Substrate ⇒ Si (100) , LaAlO3(100)
• Target ⇒
• Base pressure ⇒ 3 × 10-7 torr
• Mixed gas ⇒ Ar:O2=98:2
• Sputtering pressure 70 mtorr
• Base temperature ⇒ Room temperature
• pre-sputtering ⇒ 3 minutes
• Working distance ⇒ 10 cm
• Annealing tempert.
Annealing time ⇒
800 – 920 ℃ (700 ℃)
• 1 hrs
• RF power ⇒ 80 Watt
YBCO, LSMO
NonNon--uniform strain in Launiform strain in La0.670.67CaCa0.330.33MnOMnO33 filmfilm
InterfaceLow strainHigh strain
PRB 61, 9665 (2000)
____________________________________________________
Lattice parameter a
LCMO=3.86Å
NGO(110)=3.86 Å (no strain)
LAO(100)=3.79 Å (Compressive)
STO(100)=3.91 Å (Tensile)
AFM - granular
50 -100 nm
Rrms = 3 nm
____________________________________________________20 30 40 50 60 70
2θ
*LaAlO3
(001
)*
(002
)*
(002
)
Structures of LSMO layer
XRD – monoclinic
c-oriented
20nm
H=500 Gauss
ZFC(black line); FC (red line)
10nm0 50 100 150 200 250 300
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
M (
emu
/cm
3 )
T (K)
30nm
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
M (e
mu
/ cm
3 )
T (K)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
M (
emu
/ cm
3 )
T (K)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
M (
emu
/ cm
3 )
T (K)
?
0 50 100 150 200 250 30060
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
M (
emu
/cm
3 )
T (K)
40nm 50nm
0 50 100 150 200 250 30060
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
M (
emu
/cm
3 )T(K)
60nm
____________________________________________________Magnetization for LSMO
10 nm10 nm
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500.05
0.10
0.15
0.20(C)
T (K)
-MR
(%)
ρ (Ω
-cm
)
T(K)
0 100 200 3004
8
12
16
0.08
0.16 (b)
-MR
(%)
T (K)0 100 200 300
5
10
15
20
0.4
0.6
0.8(a)
-MR
(%)
T (K)
H = 0 H = 1T
0 100 200 300
6121824
60 nm
80 nm
100 nm
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 67, 064412 (2003)Current-induced giant electroresistance in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films
A. K. Debnath* and J. G. Lin†Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
-8000 -4000 0 4000 8000-4
-3
-2
-1
03.85%(c)
ΔR/R
o (%
)
H (Oe )
-4
-3
-2
-1
0 2.85%(b)
-4
-3
-2
-1
0 2.96%(a)
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.430
31
32
33
-ER
(%)
I (mA)
(c)
dV/d
I (K
Ω)
I (mA)
22
24
26
-ER
(%)
I (mA)
(b)
108
112
116
120
124
-ER
(%)
I (mA)
(a)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40246
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
2
4
6
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00369
12
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 67, 064412 (2003)Current-induced giant electroresistance in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films
A. K. Debnath* and J. G. Lin†Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
thickness (nm) MRH (%) MRI (%) ratio
60 2.96 5.6 (I = 0.3) 1.9
80 2.85 6.4 (I = 0.3) 2.311.3 (I = 0.9) 4.0
100 3.85 3.5 (I = 0.3) 0.94.6 (I = 0.9) 1.2
_______________________________________________________________________
Current in Current in nanowirenanowire of LSMO inducedof LSMO inducedmagnetic field, and the thermalmagnetic field, and the thermalenergy delocalized the electrons.energy delocalized the electrons.
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 67, 064412 (2003)
Current-induced giant electroresistance in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin filmsA. K. Debnath* and J. G. Lin†
Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Subject (2): Nanocrystalline YBCO/LSMObilayers
--- Proximity effect, spin injection& vortex pinning
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________Multilayer devices
YBCO
LSMOYBCO
YBCO
YBCO
LSMO
LSMO
LSMO
V IV
IinjectVI
I
Spin-injectionIc - depression
proximity effectTc - depression
FM/N/FM structureMR enhancement
____________________________________________________Interesting topics on YBCO/LSMO
1) Proximity effects 2) Andreev reflection3) Spin injection4) Spin-accumulation5) π –phase shift
Superconductor
Ferromagnet
Cooper pair
FM spin
____________________________________________________Proximity effect
1) Influence of magnetism on supercond.
Intermixing ⇒ effective exchange field
Heffect = Hex [dF/(ds+dF)], Tc oscillation
2) Influence of supercond. on magnetism
Intermixing ⇒ reconstruction of magnetic order
Tcurie oscillation
____________________________________________________
●● Normal electron injected to Normal electron injected to superconductor will besuperconductor will bereflected as a hole;reflected as a hole;
●● Polarized electron injectedPolarized electron injectedinto superconductor will kill into superconductor will kill a Cooper pair.a Cooper pair.
Spin-injection
____________________________________________________
●● YBaYBa22CuCu33OO77 ξS ~ 3-10 nm●● Critical parameter Tc = 90 K, Hc2 ~ 165 T ●● SQUID, Bolometer, Filter, ResonatorSQUID, Bolometer, Filter, Resonator……
SuperconductorSuperconductor: : RRBaBa22CuCu33OO77, R = Y or rare earth element, R = Y or rare earth element
Ba
Y
Ba
a=3.89Å
c=11.7Å
Wu, Chu et al., PRL (1987)
Half metal: (RHalf metal: (R,,Ca)MnOCa)MnO33, R = La, , R = La, NdNd, Pr, Pr……..
c R,Ca
R, Ca
Mn+3
b
a
___________________________________________________
●● Ferromagnetic with 90 % polarizationFerromagnetic with 90 % polarizationfor LCMO. for LCMO. ξξMM ~ 10 -15 nm
●● Colossal Colossal magnetoresistancemagnetoresistance (CMR)(CMR)●● Sensor, pickSensor, pick--up head, MRAMup head, MRAM
Jin et al, Science (1995)
dd--bandband
SS--bandband
____________________________________________________
LCMO = 15 unit cell ~ 10 nmLCMO = 15 unit cell ~ 10 nmN = unit cell of YBCON = unit cell of YBCON = 3 to 12N = 3 to 12
~ 3.5 to 14 nm~ 3.5 to 14 nmΔΔTcTc ~ 62 to 2 K~ 62 to 2 K
EEeffeff--exex ~ 0.74 to 0.42 of ~ 0.74 to 0.42 of EEexexN = 12N = 12
N = 1N = 1
____________________________________________________Vortex pining device
YBCO
LSMO
V
I
____________________________________________________
Critical current ICNormal state resistance RnEnergy gap Δ
Ic = I(V=1 μV) IC Rn = π ∆ / 2
= 3.52 π KB TC / 4
I-V characteristic
-4 -2 0 2 4-0.9
-0.6
-0.3
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.940nm
30nm20nm
10nm
YBCO
V (v
olt)
I (mA)
____________________________________________________I- V Characteristic (1.9 K)
Ic decreases with increasing thicknessof LSMO
____________________________________________________Hysteresis in YBCO/LSMO(30nm)Hysteresis in YBCO/LSMO(30nm)
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
2T
5T
3T4T
1T0T
V (v
olt.)
I (mA)
YBCOYBCO
Subject (3): Epitaxial YBCO/NCMObilayers
--- How the superconductivity is affected by weak ferromagnetic insulator ?
____________________________________________________
La1-xSrxMnO3
E. Dagotto et. al., Physics Reports 344, 1-153 (2001)
____________________________________________________
R0.7(Ca,Sr)0.3MnO3
C. N. R. Rao et al. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 487 (1998)
____________________________________________________Substrate criteriaSubstrate criteria
1. Atomically flat2. Chemically comparable3. Well lattice mismatch
For YBCO, LaAlO3 (100) is ~ 0.4%;SrTiO3(100) is 0.2% for a-parameter, 0.3% for b-parameter; NdGaO3 (110) is 0.7 % for a- and b-parameters
YBa2Cu3O7 (001), orthorhombic
LaAlO3 (100), rhombohedra
LaAlO3a=b=c=3.79 Åα=β=γ=90.12o
o-YBa2Cu3O7a=3.82 Å, b=3.85 Å, c=11.63 Å; α=β=γ=90o
3.79Å
3.79Å
b
a
c
Nd0.7Ca0.3MnO3 (001), orthorhombic
5.42Å
5.46Å5.44Å
5.44Å
o-Nd0.7Ca0.3MnO3a=5.42 Å, b=5.46 Å, c=7.72 Å;α=β=γ=90o
PulsePulse--LaserLaser--Deposition system Deposition system ––NeoceraNeocera 180180
Chamber
10-8 torr
PumpFlow meterVacuum gauge
KrF Laser (248 nm) Focus Len
PulsePulse--Laser Deposition system (II) Laser Deposition system (II) -- ChamberChamber
YBCO
NCMO
NCMO/YBCO NCMO/YBCO heterostructureheterostructure
Nd0.7Ca0.3MnO3, (40 -350 nm)
780oC for 1 hour in 50 mtorr O2
LaAlO3 (100)
YBa2Cu3O7(100-600 nm)
850 oC for 1 hour
400 °C for 6 hours
in 300 mtorr O2
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
10 20 30 40 50 600
2
4
10 20 30 40 50 600
4
8
2θ
NCMO(004)NCMO
(002)
YBCO(004)
YBCO(003)
YBCO(006)
YBCO(007)
YBCO(005)
LAO
YBCO(002)
(b)
Inte
nsity
(abi
tary
)
LAO(a)
X-ray Diffraction Patterns & TEM image
●● Both NCMO & YBCOare with c-axis perpendicularto the film surface
2nm001
LAONCMO
●● Epitaxial growth along [001]
____________________________________________________Basic characterizationBasic characterization
(Scanning EDX)
____________________________________________________Magnetization(MMagnetization(M) vs. Temperature (T) ) vs. Temperature (T) –– by SQUIDby SQUID
100 200
-0.4
0.0
0.4
50 1000
50
100
M (
10-6em
u)
T(K)
ZFC FC
NCMO
80 85 90 95 100
-50
0
50
ZFC FC
M(1
0-6em
u)
T(K)
YBCO
M(1
0-3 e
mu)
T(K)
ZFC FC
(a)
(b)
●● Tc is 88 K for YBCO; TN is ~ 75 K for NCMO; Both transition temperature do not change in NCMO(40nm)/YBCO(160nm).
____________________________________________________
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0
5.0x103
1.0x104
1.5x104
2.0x104
ρ (m
ohm
-cm
)
T(K)
YBCO
NCMOTcon
Tcoff
V
LAO
NCMO
I
●● YBCO : Tc ~ 88 K & ΔT < 2 K; NCMO: Insulating
44--Probe methodProbe method
____________________________________________________●● For Ia = 1 – 90 mA, normal state increases & Tc drops
with a rate 0.1K/mA.●● open a gap at 230 K ?open a gap at 230 K ?
Resistivity (ρ) vs. Temperature (T)
YBCO(200nm)
50 100 150 200 2500.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
80 85 900.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
ρ (1
0-3oh
m-c
m)
T(K)
0.1mA 10 mA 30 mA 50 mA 70 mA 90 mA
ρ (1
0-3 o
hm-c
m)
T(K)
____________________________________________________
●● For Ia = 5 – 30 mA, resistivity decreases.
Resistivity (ρ) vs. Temperature (T)
NCMO(200nm)
100 150 200 250
100
101
102
103
104
200 250
10-1
5 mA 10 mA 20 mA 30 mA
ρ (o
hm-c
m)
T(K)
0.0001mA 0.001mA 0.01mA 0.1mA 1mA
ρ (o
hm-c
m)
T(K)
____________________________________________________
0 50 100 150 200 2500.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
40mA
1mA
ρ (m
ohm
-cm
)
T(K)
1mA
40mA
●● For Ia = 1 – 40 mA, normalstate increases & Tc dropswith a rate of 1.0 K/mA.
Resistivity (ρ) vs. Temperature (T)
NCMO(200nm)/YBCO(200nm)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
2
4
6
8
10
R (o
hm)
T(K)
1 mA
40mA
30mA
20mA
10
Crossing point
____________________________________________________
●● For Ia = 1 – 40 mA, normalstate decreases 30% & Tc drops with a rate of 1.4 K/mA.
Resistivity (ρ) vs. Temperature (T)
NCMO(40nm)/YBCO(160nm)
0 50 100 150 200 2500
5
10
15
0.001mA 0.01mA 0.1mA 1mA
ρ (1
0-3 o
hm-c
m)
T(K)
40mA30mA 20mA
10mA
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140 0.001mA 0.01mA 0.1mA 1mA
R(o
hm)
T(K)
40mA30mA
20mA10mA
____________________________________________________
●● Tc is suppressed by proximityin NCMO/YBCO at I < 1 mA.
●● Tc-suppresion rate at I > 1 mAis one order higher in bilayerdue to the spin-injection.
Superconducting temperature vs. applying current
0 20 40 60 80 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
T c (K
)
I (mA)
YBCO
NCMO(40)/YBCO(160)
NCMO(200)/YBCO(200)
____________________________________________________
●● Current induces spin-injection effect
Observe a threshold of effective current I > 1 mALarge Tc-suppresion in a rate of 1.4 K/mA.
●● Proximity effect
Heff-ex = Hex {dF/(dS + dF)}
0.5Hex for NCMO(200nm)/YBCO(200nm)0.2Hex for NCMO(40nm)/YBCO(160nm)
ΔTc ~ 34K / 16K
Half metal is the future material forall kinds of spintronic devices !!!
____________________________________________________