Top Banner
Spiciness anomalies generated in the SouthEast Pacific are subducted in the thermocline and flow in the SEC towards the SouthWest Pacific (Fig 1). The SEC feeds the Solomon Sea western boundary New Guinea Coastal Undercurrent (NGCU) which is a primary source of the EUC. Thus, variations of the NGCU characteristics might impact on the equatorial features and more generally on decadal climate variability. Therefore, the study of the Solomon Sea is one of the key issues of the SPICE program. Here, we focus on the variability of the Solomon Sea in term of sea level. It is a region of high sla variability (Fig 2), mostly because of ENSO (Ridgway 1993) and the SECC variability for the annual period (Qiu and Chen 2004 and Chen and Qiu 2004). However, previous altimetric studies didn’t distinguished this semi closed sea from the rest of the SouthWest Pacific since they used gridded products. We propose an original method to focus on the Solomon Sea and its specific behaviour. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction 2. Methods 2. Methods 3. Results 3. Results This study reveals a high sla variability in the Solomon Sea, mainly at interannual and seasonal time scales. The Solomon Sea evolves in phase but most of the variability is in the eastern part, characterized by complex recirculations, even if the western part is governed by a WBC dynamic. The eastern part is highly related to the east side of the Solomon islands at both seasonnal and interannual time scales. This can be due to the penetration of Rossby waves in the Solomon strait. At seasonnal time scale, there is no transport from the south of 11°S into the Solomon Sea : the seasonal variability is generated by Rossby waves from the east of the Solomon Islands and / or local wind forcing. At interannual time scale, the high variability in the Solomon Sea is associated with high eke. The Bismark Sea and the east side of the Solomon Islands signals are highly related. What is the exact role played by the NGCC to transport anomalies signal to the equator? At this time, we are not able to depict the variability associated to the narrow NGCC but we will investigate it with along track altimetric data. It could explain why the variability in the west is so small. Most of these questions will be investigated from a modelling approach with a hierarchy of high resolution (1/4° 1/12°) regional models. The altimetric dataset will be used to perform a realistic simulation of the regional circulations through data assimilation. 4. 4. Conclusions/Perspecti Conclusions/Perspecti ves ves VARIABILITY IN THE SOLOMON SEA FROM ALTIMETRIC SEA LEVEL DATA VARIABILITY IN THE SOLOMON SEA FROM ALTIMETRIC SEA LEVEL DATA Angélique Melet 1 , Lionel Gourdeau 2 , William S. Kessler 3 , Jacques Verron 1 1.LEGI, France 2. LEGOS, IRD Nouméa 3. NOAA/PMEL, Seattle Altimetric Data : This work is based on original along track Topex- Poseidon data (Fig4). New data processing (CTOH/LEGOS) has been applied to recover proper data and to gain more information on the altimetric signal (Fig 5) in this region of complex topography with numerous islands (Fig 3). A track by track specific and customized post processing has been used to finalize the dataset. We also used the AVISO sla gridded product for the T/P period. Tide Gauges : These new altimetric data have been assessed against tide gauge data (JASL dataset, daily SSH corrected from atmospheric effects with altimetric corrections). 11 tide gauges were used (Fig 4), an exemple is given for Honiara and TP086. Numerical Simulations : Model 1 : - Resolution : ¼°, 46 levels. - Regional with four open and radiative boundaries forced by the Drakkar OGCM. - Interannual forcing (CORE – radiations and precipitations- and ERA40 –atmospheric data-). - Initial conditions : Levitus T and S fields. - Starts in 1987. Years 1991 to 2000 have been exploited. Model 2 : model 1 with a nested high resolution grid over the Solomon Sea. - Resolution : 1/12° -Nest : Agrif 2 ways (retroaction of the fine grid on the coarse grid). Fig 1. Source : Spice Spice Scientific Background. Salinity on the isopycnal 25.5 (color) and isopycnal depth (contours) from Levitus climatology. Fig 2. Rms of sla from aviso gridded product. Fig 9. Mean vertical transport from the regional simulation (1991- 2000). Fig 7. Track TP086 and Honiara tide gauge positions. Fig 8. Altimetric and tide gauge sla time series. Raw data Inter annual Seasonal Intra seasonal Fig 11. Rms of sla for different temporal scale. Fig 15. Eof of sla from aviso gridded product 1992-2004. Mode 1. Fig 17. Aviso gridded product 1 cpy harmonic. 1/4° resolution isn’t enough to generate eddy scales, thus the variability isn’t well represented in the model. The first mode of sla eof represents 71% of the variance in altimetric data and seems to be highly correlated with ENSO. The high sea level variability in the northeastern part of the Solomon Sea occurs in an area of high EKE which exhibits a high interannual activity. Strongest sla variability in the PSW is located on each side of the Solomon Islands from Interannual to seasonnal time scales. The interannual signal is higher than the annual cycle. In the Solomon Sea, there is a lower variability on the west side (characteristic of the WBC) than on the east side (complex recirculations dynamic). Emergence of a 60 days frequency in the Solomon Sea ? The eastern and western parts of the Solomon Sea are not directly correlated. The western part of the Solomon Sea is better correlated with the south side of PNG (NGCC fed by NQC and maybe by a more direct path from the Coral Sea at the Louisiade archipelago). The eastern part of the Solomon Sea is better correlated with the east side of the Solomon Islands (the archipelago is not an obstacle for the sla signal). The Bismarck Sea is better correlated with the east side of the Solomon Islands than with the western part of the Solomon Sea. Fig 4. TP tracks, tide gauges. Fig 5. Number of cycles and sla rms for aviso and the new altimetr ic dataset (TP251). Maximum of amplitude in the SE part of the Solomon Sea. Phase jump at the south limit of the Solomon Sea : no direct inflow between 155 and 163°E. Rossby waves propagation near 6.5°S east of the Solomon Sea. Solomon Sea evolves in phase with sla maximum in march (phase of the Rossby wave entering by the Solomon Strait. Fig 20. Amplitude and phase for the 1 cpy harmonic. The phase jump at 10°S isn’t similar to the altimetric one, because of a ill-defined bathymetry ? Fig 19. Eof for interannual sla. Maximum of variability isn’t north enough. Different temporal variabilities : Fig 12. Rms of sla and spectrum in the Solomon Sea. lations between different areas in and around the Solomon Sea : East of Solomon Islands Solomon Sea, East side North of New Britain 3°S East of the Solomon Is. West Solomon Sea side East Solomon Sea side South of PNG,Coral Sea West Solomon Sea side South of PNG:11.5,13°S West Solomon Sea side 13. Mean areas in and around the Solomon Sea spectrum and sla time series. Interannual variability : Fig 14. Mean EKE from aviso gridded product 1992-2004. Fig 16. EKE time serie for 150:155°E 5:9°S from aviso gridded product 1992- 2004. Seasonal variability : Model : Fig 18. Hovmuller of seasonal sla at 6.5°S.
1

Spiciness anomalies generated in the SouthEast Pacific are subducted in the thermocline and flow in the SEC towards the SouthWest Pacific (Fig 1). The.

Jan 20, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Spiciness anomalies generated in the SouthEast Pacific are subducted in the thermocline and flow in the SEC towards the SouthWest Pacific (Fig 1). The.

Spiciness anomalies generated in the SouthEast Pacific are subducted in the thermocline and flow in the SEC towards the SouthWest Pacific (Fig 1). The SEC feeds the Solomon Sea western boundary New Guinea Coastal Undercurrent (NGCU) which is a primary source of the EUC. Thus, variations of the NGCU characteristics might impact on the equatorial features and more generally on decadal climate variability. Therefore, the study of the Solomon Sea is one of the key issues of the SPICE program. Here, we focus on the variability of the Solomon Sea in term of sea level. It is a region of high sla variability (Fig 2), mostly because of ENSO (Ridgway 1993) and the SECC variability for the annual period (Qiu and Chen 2004 and Chen and Qiu 2004). However, previous altimetric studies didn’t distinguished this semi closed sea from the rest of the SouthWest Pacific since they used gridded products. We propose an original method to focus on the Solomon Sea and its specific behaviour.

1. Introduction1. Introduction

2. Methods2. Methods

3. Results3. Results

This study reveals a high sla variability in the Solomon Sea, mainly at interannual and seasonal time scales. The Solomon Sea evolves in phase but most of the variability is in the eastern part, characterized by complex recirculations, even if the western part is governed by a WBC dynamic. The eastern part is highly related to the east side of the Solomon islands at both seasonnal and interannual time scales. This can be due to the penetration of Rossby waves in the Solomon strait. At seasonnal time scale, there is no transport from the south of 11°S into the Solomon Sea : the seasonal variability is generated by Rossby waves from the east of the Solomon Islands and / or local wind forcing. At interannual time scale, the high variability in the Solomon Sea is associated with high eke.The Bismark Sea and the east side of the Solomon Islands signals are highly related. What is the exact role played by the NGCC to transport anomalies signal to the equator? At this time, we are not able to depict the variability associated to the narrow NGCC but we will investigate it with along track altimetric data. It could explain why the variability in the west is so small. Most of these questions will be investigated from a modelling approach with a hierarchy of high resolution (1/4° 1/12°) regional models. The altimetric dataset will be used to perform a realistic simulation of the regional circulations through data assimilation.

4. 4. Conclusions/PerspectiConclusions/Perspecti

vesves

VARIABILITY IN THE SOLOMON SEA FROM ALTIMETRIC SEA LEVEL DATAVARIABILITY IN THE SOLOMON SEA FROM ALTIMETRIC SEA LEVEL DATA

Angélique Melet1, Lionel Gourdeau2, William S. Kessler3, Jacques Verron1

1.LEGI, France 2. LEGOS, IRD Nouméa 3. NOAA/PMEL, Seattle

Altimetric Data :This work is based on original along track Topex-Poseidon data (Fig4). New data processing (CTOH/LEGOS) has been applied to recover proper data and to gain more information on the altimetric signal (Fig 5) in this region of complex topography with numerous islands (Fig 3). A track by track specific and customized post processing has been used to finalize the dataset.We also used the AVISO sla gridded product for the T/P period.

Tide Gauges :These new altimetric data have been assessed against tide gauge data (JASL dataset, daily SSH corrected from atmospheric effects with altimetric corrections). 11 tide gauges were used (Fig 4), an exemple is given for Honiara and TP086.

Numerical Simulations :Model 1 : - Resolution : ¼°, 46 levels.- Regional with four open and radiative boundaries forced by the Drakkar OGCM. - Interannual forcing (CORE –radiations and precipitations- and ERA40 –atmospheric data-).- Initial conditions : Levitus T and S fields. - Starts in 1987. Years 1991 to 2000 have been exploited.Model 2 : model 1 with a nested high resolution grid over the Solomon Sea.- Resolution : 1/12° -Nest : Agrif 2 ways (retroaction of the fine grid on the coarse grid).

Fig 1. Source : Spice Spice Scientific Background. Salinity on the isopycnal 25.5 (color) and isopycnal depth (contours) from Levitus climatology.

Fig 2. Rms of sla from aviso gridded product.

Fig 9. Mean vertical transport from the

regional simulation (1991-2000).

Fig 7. Track TP086 and Honiara tide gauge positions. Fig 8. Altimetric and tide gauge

sla time series.

Raw data Inter annualSeasonal Intra seasonal

Fig 11. Rms of sla for different temporal scale.

Fig 15. Eof of sla from aviso gridded product 1992-2004.

Mode 1.

Fig 17. Aviso gridded product 1 cpy

harmonic.

1/4° resolution isn’t enough to generate eddy scales, thus the variability isn’t well represented in the model.

The first mode of sla eof represents 71% of the variance in altimetric data and seems to be highly correlated with ENSO.The high sea level variability in the northeastern part of the Solomon Sea occurs in an area of high EKE which exhibits a high interannual activity.

Strongest sla variability in the PSW is located on each side of the Solomon Islands from Interannual to seasonnal time scales.The interannual signal is higher than the annual cycle. In the Solomon Sea, there is a lower variability on the west side (characteristic of the WBC) than on the east side (complex recirculations dynamic). Emergence of a 60 days frequency in the Solomon Sea ?

The eastern and western parts of the Solomon Sea are not directly correlated.The western part of the Solomon Sea is better correlated with the south side of PNG (NGCC fed by NQC and maybe by a more direct path from the Coral Sea at the Louisiade archipelago). The eastern part of the Solomon Sea is better correlated with the east side of the Solomon Islands (the archipelago is not an obstacle for the sla signal). The Bismarck Sea is better correlated with the east side of the Solomon Islands than with the western part of the Solomon Sea.

Fig 4. TP tracks, tide gauges.

Fig 5. Number of cycles and sla rms for aviso and the new altimetric dataset

(TP251).

Maximum of amplitude in the SE part of the Solomon Sea. Phase jump at the south limit of the Solomon Sea : no direct inflow between 155 and 163°E. Rossby waves propagation near 6.5°S east of the Solomon Sea. Solomon Sea evolves in phase with sla maximum in march (phase of the Rossby wave entering by the Solomon Strait.

Fig 20. Amplitude and phase for the 1 cpy harmonic. The phase jump at 10°S isn’t similar to the altimetric one, because of a ill-defined bathymetry ?

Fig 19. Eof for interannual sla. Maximum of variability isn’t north enough.

Different temporal variabilities :

Fig 12. Rms of sla and spectrum in the Solomon Sea.

Relations between different areas in and around the Solomon Sea :

East of Solomon IslandsSolomon Sea, East side

North of New Britain 3°SEast of the Solomon Is.

West Solomon Sea sideEast Solomon Sea side

South of PNG,Coral SeaWest Solomon Sea side

South of PNG:11.5,13°SWest Solomon Sea side

Fig 13. Mean areas in and around the Solomon Sea spectrum and sla time series.

Interannual variability :

Fig 14. Mean EKE from aviso gridded

product 1992-2004. Fig 16. EKE time serie for

150:155°E 5:9°S from aviso gridded product 1992-2004.

Seasonal variability :

Model :

Fig 18. Hovmuller of seasonal sla at 6.5°S.