Page 1
1
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Spent Fuel Pool safety and performance
Development and application of MAAP5 Spent Fuel
Model for enhancement of EOPs and SAMGs in light
of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
Power Plant and stress test evaluations.
Chan Young Paik, Quan Zhou
Fauske and Associates, LLC., USA
Oleg Solovjanov , Robert Prior
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Belgium
Page 2
2
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Outline
1. Motivation
2. Features needed
3. Modeling
4. Testing
5. Status and Future Plans
Page 3
3
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Motivation - Spent Fuel Pool Model
– Model development started before Fukushima
– Motivated by the need to evaluate Accident Management
strategies and provide (not unnecessarily conservative) inputs to
PSA level 2:
• Pool heatup times;
• Effects of boiling:
• Building thermal-hydraulics.
• Hydrogen from radiolysis.
• Source term analysis.
• Accident management and severe accident management strategy
evaluation
– In line with MAAP philosophy, aim was to produce best estimate
predictions.
Page 4
4
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Features Required
• Fuel rack design.
• Heat loads and inventories.
• Heat sinks and gas space behavior including hydrogen.
• Fuel damage and melt progression:
– Cladding oxidation in air.
– Ru release.
• The model uses a special MAAP containment control
volume with additional models.
Page 5
5
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
The MAAP Code
• Modular Accident Analysis Program
• Integrated code for severe accident analysis.
• Applications include:
– SAM strategy verification
– PSA2 sequence analysis and source term analysis
– Design of mitigation systems
• Increasingly used for „pre-core damage‟ scenarios.
• EPRI owns MAAP and manages development.
• FAI is main developer.
• MAAP5 includes major model upgrades, including
improved primary system modeling, neutron kinetics.
Page 6
6
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Key Features of MAAP5 Spent Fuel Pool Model
• The storage pool is represented by a water pool model in the
MAAP containment (reactor building) model.
• Current model does not calculate water natural circulation
within fuel racks.
• MAAP calculates a gas natural circulation once the water level
decrease below the bottom of the fuel rack or fuel rack melted
away.
• Current model allows up to 40 channels.
• Each channel can have filled or empty cells, and hot and cold
fuel assemblies, but the decay power within a channel is
homogenized.
Page 7
7
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Key Features of MAAP5 Spent Fuel Pool Model (Continued)
• The checker board configuration can be modeled by
dividing channels based on assemblies (i.e., individually
modeling “hot” assembly as one channel and “cold”
assemblies as another channel).
• Each channel is homogenized. Thus, in-homogeneity and
non-symmetrical nature of the SFP pool must be modeled
at the hierarchical level of channel. Users are allowed to
use up to 40 channels and each rack can be modeled as
multiple channels.
• The storage pool wall is represented by distributed heat
sink model.
Page 8
8
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Key Features of MAAP5 Spent Fuel Pool Model (Continued)
• Spent fuel rack and fuel assemblies are modeled similar to the
MAAP5 core model (uses identical models).
– Spent fuel racks and assemblies are modeled as 2-D (channels and
axial nodes) objects. There can be one or more channels for each rack.
– Up to 20 different types of fuel assemblies can be specified in each
channel.
– The rack wall (steel with boraflex plate) is modeled as one of the core
components surrounding each fuel assembly, such as control blades in
BWR.
– Boiled-up level for each channel is calculated based on the steam
generation rate within the channel.
Page 9
9
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Defining Inputs for Representative Types of Spent Fuel Assembly
• Maximum of 20 different types of fuel
assemblies (power groups) can be defined
– Cycle and Burn-up History
– How long for each cycle and how much
accumulated burn-up at the end of the cycle
– Cooling time
– Time the fuel assembly is cooled in the
spent fuel pool (including time from
shutdown to transfer into pool)
– Initial Enrichment
– Masses of Materials
– UO2, Zr, Ag-In-Cd, B4C, Stainless Steel, etc.
– Number of Fuel Pins and Non-Fuel Rods
Page 10
10
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Spent Fuel Rack Designs
Page 11
11
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Spent Fuel Channel (Rack) Modeling
• Currently, only the High Density Rack (HDR) and square type racks are modeled.
• Spent fuel pool can be divided into 2-D model:
– # of channels (racks) * # of axial nodes
(up to 40) (up to 100)
• User can specify types and number of fuel assemblies for each channel (rack).
• For a given channel, there can be filled or empty cells. Averaged fuel assembly properties are used to represent filled cells
Page 12
12
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Defining Inputs for Spent Fuel Channel (Rack)
• Geometric Information
– Number of storage cells for each channel (rack)
– Number of fuel assemblies (filled cells) for each channel (rack)
– Center-to-center distance between two adjacent cells
– Thickness of rack wall
– Thickness of Boraflex sheet in the rack wall
– Total height of the spent fuel rack
– Height of the top and bottom non-fuel regions in the spent fuel rack
• Assemblies in the Rack
– Number of specific type of spent fuel assemblies in the rack
Page 13
13
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Zr Oxidation in Air
• Zr + O2 → ZrO2 + ∆HZr
∆HZr : Heat of reaction per mole of Zr
(=1.1 x 109 J/kg–mole [1])
[1] D.A. Powers, “Technical Issues Associated with Air Ingression During
Core Degradation,” SAND2000-1935C, Sandia National Laboratories,
2000
• MAAP5 uses NUREG Correlations (NUREG/CR-6218)
Page 14
14
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Relocation Model
• Relocation model is similar to core relocation model except:
– Sideward relocation between channels is not allowed.
– Molten mass at the bottom node is allowed to relocate into the floor
without forming a crust.
• Molten steel from steel rack is relocated one axial node at a
time.
• Fuel rod collapse criteria is based on the model used in the
core based on the Larson-Miller approach (time at
temperature).
• Fuel rack collapse is modeled based on the bottom node
temperature using the Larson-Miller approach.
Page 15
15
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Example Cases
• 4-Loop PWR Spent Fuel Pool is modeled as one reactor building node
• Spent fuel pool fuel assemblies are modeled as 30 channels (racks)
with 22 axial nodes
• Total decay heat ~ 7.73 MW with 840 fuel assemblies
• Pool floor area = 178 m2
• Limited gas circulation between upper space and fuel region
• Condensate in the walls and ceiling return to the water pool
• For a normal water level, it will take a more than a week to uncover the
top of fuel assemblies for a loss of pool cooling event
• Three Cases:
– 1) Normal Initial water level (12.0 m) with a loss of pool cooling
– 2) Initial water level is set to 5.0 m with a loss of pool cooling
– 3) No water in the spent fuel pool (just to test the models)
Page 16
16
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Example: PWR Spent Fuel Pool
Page 17
17
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Channel Nodalization (30 channels)
1 3 2 5 4 6
7 9 8 11 10 12
13 15 14 17 16 18
19 21 20 23 22 24
25 27 26 29 28 30
Spen
t
Fuel
Chan
nel
Page 18
18
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Case 1 (Normal Water Level)
• It will take about one week to uncover the top of fuel
assemblies.
Top of fuel
assembly
Page 19
19
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Case 2 (Water level and Pressure )
Corium
Level
Hydroge
n burn
Page 20
20
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Case 2 (Gas Temperature and Hydrogen Mole Fraction)
Page 21
21
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Case 2( Fuel Node Temperatures)
Page 22
22
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Case 2 (Mass of Hydrogen and Molten Corium Mass )
Page 23
23
Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Status and Future Development
• MAAP 5.01 (December 2011), first version – includes Spent
Fuel Pool model.
Planned developments:
• Radiolysis.
• Tests for other types of spent fuel pool designs.
• Improvements to radiation and natural circulation models.
• Validate the model against available data and other detailed
codes.