Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation David Attwood University of California, Berkeley (http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/AST/srms) Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Spatial and Temporal Coherence;Coherent Undulator Radiation
David Attwood
University of California, Berkeley
(http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/AST/srms)
Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
d
Ch08_F00VG.ai
λθ
λ
e–
Pinhole
d
λ
λθ
lcoh = λ2/2∆λ {temporal (longitudinal) coherence}
d θ = λ/2π {spatial (transverse) coherence}
or d 2θFWHM = 0.44 λ
(8.3)
(8.5)
(8.5*)
Pcoh,λ/∆λ = 1– ƒ(K)
(8.6)
(8.9)
Pcoh = Plaser (8.11)
(λ/2π)2
(dxθx)(dyθy)
(λ/2π)2
(dxθx)(dyθy)
ωω0
eλuIη(∆λ/λ)N2
8π0dxdy
Pcoh,N = Pcen
λu
COHERENCE AT SHORT WAVELENGTHSChapter 8
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
d θ
λλ
CH08_YoungsExprmt_v3.ai
Young’s Double Slit Experiment: Spatial Coherence and the Persistence of Fringes
Persistence of fringes as the source grows from a point source to finite size.
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
d 2θ|FWHM λ/2
λcoh = λ2/2∆λ = Ncohλ12
Spatial and Spectral Filteringto Produce Coherent Radiation
Ch08_F08VG.ai
Courtesy of A. Schawlow, Stanford.Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_F01VG.ai
Coherence, Partial Coherence, and Incoherence
θd
λ λ, ∆λ
Point source oscillator– < t <
Source of finite size,divergence, and duration
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Spatial and Temporal Coherence
Ch08_Eq1_12_F2VG.ai
(8.1)
(8.12)
(8.3)
(8.5)
Mutual coherence factor
Longitudinal (temporal) coherence length
Full spatial (transverse) coherence
Normalize degree of spatial coherence(complex coherence factor)
A high degree of coherence (µ → 1)implies an ability to form a high contrastinterference (fringe) pattern. A low degreeof coherence (µ → 0) implies an absenceof interference, except with great care.In general radiation is partially coherent.
Transverse (spatial)coherence
Longitudinalcoherence length
Point source,harmonic oscillator
P1
P2
P2
coh = λ2/2∆λ
P1
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Spectral Bandwidth andLongitudinal Coherence Length
Ch08_F03VG.ai
(8.3)
Define a coherence length coh as the distance of propagation over which radiation of spectral width ∆λ becomes 180° out of phase. For a wavelength λ propagating through N cycles
and for a wavelength λ + ∆λ, a half cycle less (N – )
Equating the two
so that
λ ∆λ
∆λ
λcoh
180 phase shift1.00
coh = Nλ
coh = (N– ) (λ + ∆λ)
N = λ/2∆λ
12
12
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
• Associate spatial coherence with a spherical wavefront.• A spherical wavefront implies a point source.• How small is a “point source”?
Ch08_XBL 915-6740AVG.ai
From Heisenberg’s UncertaintyPrinciple (∆x · ∆p ≥ ), the smallest source size “d” you can resolve, withwavelength λ and half angle θ, is
d · θ = λ2π
d
λ
θ
2
A Practical Interpretationof Spatial Coherence
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_XBL883-8849.modf.ai
Partially Coherent Radiation ApproachesUncertainty Principle Limits
∆x ∆p ≥ /2
quantities1e
∆x k∆θ ≥ 1/2
∆x ∆k ≥ /2
2∆x ∆θ ≥ λ/2π
Standard deviations of Gaussian distributed functions(Tipler, 1978, pp. 174-189)
Spherical wavefronts occurin the limiting case
or(d 2θ)FWHM λ/2 FWHM quantities
Note: ∆p = ∆k ∆k = k∆θ
d = 2∆x
(spatially coherent)d θ = λ/2π
θ
∆k∆θk
(8.4)
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 20077
Ch08_F05VG.ai
Propagation of a Gaussian Beam
r0
Waist
λ
z Gaussian intensitydistribution, sphericallypropagating wave
r(z) θ
In
with waist diameter d = 2r0, we have TEM00 radiation with d θ = λ/2π
(Siegman, Lasers)
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_HeisenbergVG.aiProfessor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Spatially Coherent Undulator Radiation
λ = 11.2 nm λ = 13.4 nm
1 µmD pinhole
25 mm wide CCDat 410 mm
Ch08_Coh_SXR_Sci .PPTProfessor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley
Courtesy of Patrick Naulleau, LBNL.
Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_SpatialFiltrng.ai
Spatial Filtering of Undulator Radiation
Undulator central radiation cone ( = N ; θ = ):
With spatial filtering (a pinhole and an angular aperture):
(5.41a)
(8.6)
(8.9)
With eq.(5.28), . Convert to photon
energies where for θ = 0, , and where
corresponds to K = 0. For small electron beamdiverence, σ′ << θcen, the spatially coherent power is
λ∆λ
1γ* N
≤ 1 ≤ 1
2 2x,y
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
500 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
5
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
Photon energy (eV)
Tuningcurve
Coh
eren
t pow
er (
mW
)
λ∆λ = N
Pcoh = · Pcen
coh = Nλ/2
(λ/2π)2
(dxθx)(dyθy)
Spatially Filtered Undulator Radiation
Ch08_F09VG.ai
(8.6)
(8.9)
Using a pinhole-aperture spatial filter, passing only radiation that satisfies d θ = λ/2π
for dx = 2σx, dy = 2σy, θTx → θx, θTy → θy,and σ′2 << θcen.2
Photon energy (eV)
Pce
n (W
)
Tuningcurve
λ∆λ = N
Pcen = ·πeγ 2I0λu
K2f(K)
(1 + K2/2)2
λu = 8 cmN = 551.9 GeV0.4 ampn = 1(only)
0 100 200 300 4000
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00Undulatorradiation
d
Spatialfilter
Pinhole
N periods
1 γ∗1
Nγ∗
1
Nγ∗
θcen =
θcen = ; = N; γ* = γ/ 1 + K2/2
λ = (1 + + γ2θ2)λu
2γ2
λ∆λ cen
θ
Angularaperture
K2
2
e–
λu
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_SpatialSpectral.ai
Spatial and Spectral Filtering of Undulater Radiation
In addition to the pinhole – angular aperture for spatialfiltering and spatial coherence, add a monochromator for narrowed bandwidth and increased temporal coherence:
which for σ′ << θcen (the undulator condition) gives thespatially and temporally coherent power ( ; )
which we note scales as N2.
(8.10a)
(8.10c)
2 2x,y
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Spatially and Spectrally FilteredUndulator Radiation
Ch08_F11VG.ai
(8.10a)
(8.10c)
• Pinhole filtering for full spatial coherence• Monochromator for spectral filtering to λ/∆λ > N
M1planemirror
M2spherical
mirror
Water-cooledbeam definingapertures
8.0 cm periodundulator
EUVinterferometer
166°
Variedline-
spacegrating
Exitslit
166°
M6bendable
EntrancepinholeM5
planeM4
bendable
M3retractable
planemirror
M0retract-
ableplanemirror
EUV/soft x-rayphotoemission
microscope
500 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 4500
100
50
200
150
Photon energy [eV]
Coh
eren
t pow
er (W
)
λ∆λ = 103
8.0 cm period, N = 551.9 GeV, 400 mAd θ = λ/2πcoh = 103λ/2η = 10%
Tuningcurve
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_CohOptBLwGraf_Feb07.ai
Tuningcurves
8.0 cm period, N = 551.9 GeV, 400 mAd θ = λ/2πcoh = 1000 λ/2ηeuv = 10%, ηsxr = 10%
Coherent Power with a Monochromator
M2spherical2 mirror
Water-cooledbeam definingapertures
8.0 cm periodundulator
Variedline-space
grating
Exitslit172°
M4bendable2 mirror
M3bendable2 mirror
M0retractable
plane2 mirror
Entrancepinhole
CoherentSoft X-ray
End Station
K-Bfocus
system
Coherent Soft X-Ray Beamline: Use of a Higher Harmonic (n = 3) to AccessShorter Wavelengths
0
100
200
300
102 103
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ (
µW)
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 103
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power at the ALS
Ch08_U8_Feb07.ai
1.9 GeV, 400 mAλu = 80 mm, N = 550.5 ≤ K ≤ 4.0σx = 260 µm, σx′ = 23 µrσy = 16 µm, σy′ = 3.9 µr
0 200 400 600 800 10000
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
100
200
300
102 103102 103
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
U8
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 55
λ∆λ = 55
λ∆λ = 165
λ∆λ
= 103
λ∆λ
= 103
ηeuv = 10%ηsxr = 10%
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power at the ALS
Ch08_U5_Feb07.ai
1.9 GeV, 400 mAλu = 50 mm, N = 890.5 ≤ K ≤ 4.0σx = 260 µm, σx′ = 23 µrσy = 16 µm, σy′ = 3.9 µrη = 10%
U5
0 500
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
1000 1500 20000
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
100
200
300
400
102 103102 103
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
λ∆λ
= 89 λ∆λ
= 103
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_ALS_U5epu_Feb07.ai
1.9 GeV, 400 mAλu = 50 mm, N = 270.5 ≤ K ≤ 4.0σx = 260 µm, σx′ = 23 µrσy = 16 µm, σy′ = 3.9 µrθcen = 61µr @ K = 0.87 (500 eV)
U5 EPU
0 500
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
η = 1.3%
n = 3
1000 1500 20000
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
5
10
15
20
0
2
4
6
102 103102 103
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
λ∆λ
= 27 λ∆λ = 103
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power for an EPU at the ALS
0 200 400 600 800 10000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
2
4
6
8
102 103102 103
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
Ch08_MAXII_Feb07.ai
1.5 GeV, 250 mAλu = 52 mm, N = 490.1 ≤ K ≤ 2.7σx = 300 µm, σx′ = 26 µrσy = 45 µm, σy′ = 20 µrη = 10%
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 49 λ∆λ
= 103
0
10
20
30
40
Coherent Power at MAX II
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power at Elettra
Ch08_Elettra_Feb07.ai
2.0 GeV, 300 mAλu = 56 mm, N = 810.5 ≤ K ≤ 2.3σx = 255 µm, σx′ = 23 µrσy = 31 µm, σy′ = 9 µrη = 10%
0
0.5
1.5
2.0
1.0
0
5
10
15
20
0
50
100
150
102 103102 103
102 103
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(m
W)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 81
λ∆λ
= 81
λ∆λ
= 103
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
PohangPowerCurves.ai
2.5 GeV, 180 mAλu = 70 mm, N = 590 ≤ K ≤ 6.5σx = 433 µm, σx′ = 43 µrσy = 27 µm, σy′ = 6.8 µrθcen = 33 µr @ K = 1η = 10%
0 500
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
1000 1500 2000 25000
0.5
1
1.5
0
2
4
6
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
101 102 103101 102 103
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
λ∆λ
= 59
λ∆λ
= 59
λ∆λ
= 1000
Coherent Power at the Pohang Light Source
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power at New Subaru
Ch08_NewSubaru_Feb07.ai
1.0 GeV, 100 mAλu = 54 mm, N = 2000.3 ≤ K ≤ 2.5σx = 450 µm, σx′ = 89 µrσy = 220 µm, σy′ = 18 µrη = 10%
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
5
10
15
20
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
101 103102102101 103
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
λ∆λ
= 103λ∆λ
= 200
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
CohPwr_CLS_Feb07.ai
2.9 GeV, 500 mAλu = 75 mm, N = 21.50 ≤ K ≤ 5.2σx = 440 µm, σx′ = 47 µrσy = 88 µm, σy′ = 21 µrθcen = 47 µr @ K = 1η = 10%0 1000 20001500 2500 3000500
1020
4
6
2
8
10
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
n = 1
n = 3
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3λ
∆λ = 103
0
1
2
4
3
5
0
1
2
3
4
102 103 103 3 1033 103
Photon Energy (eV)
CLS, 75 mm EPU
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
n = 1
λ∆λ = 22
λ∆λ = 65
λ∆λ = 22
Coherent Power at the Canadian Light Source
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power Predictedwith SPEAR 3 at SSRL
Ch08_SPEAR3_SSRL_Feb07.ai
3.0 GeV, 500 mAλu = 3.3 cm, N = 1050 ≤ K ≤ 2.2σx = 436 µm, σx′ = 43 µradσy = 30 µm, σy′ = 6.3 µradθcen = 17 µrad @ K = 1η = 10%
Photon Energy (eV)
n = 1
n = 3λ∆λ
= 103
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (keV)
n = 1
n = 3λ
∆λ= 105
0 2 4 6 8
104103104103
P coh
, N (m
W)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
15
10
5
0
0
5
10
n = 1
n = 3
0
50
100
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power at the Australian Synchrotron
CohPwr_AustralSynch_Feb07.ai
Photon Energy (eV)
n = 1
n = 3λ
∆λ= 103
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 80
λ∆λ
= 80
λ∆λ= 240
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
104103104103
P coh
, N (m
W)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
8
6
2
0
0
2
4
6
n = 1
n = 3
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
3.0 GeV, 200 mAλu = 22 mm, N = 800 ≤ K ≤ 1.8σx = 320 µm, σx′ = 34 µradσy = 16 µm, σy′ = 6 µradθcen = 23 µrad @ K = 1η = 10%
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Coherent Power at the UK’s Diamond Synchrotron Facility
CohPwr_DiamondUK_Feb07.ai
3.0 GeV, 300 mAλu = 2.4 cm, N = 820 ≤ K ≤ 1.4σx = 123 µm, σx′ = 24 µrσy = 6.4 µm, σy′ = 4.2 µrθcen = 23 µr @ K = 1η = 10%1000 5000 900070003000
103 1040
200300
100
400500600
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
n = 1
n = 3
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3λ
∆λ= 103
0
2
4
8
6
10
0102030405060
103 104
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
) n = 1
λ∆λ
= 82
Courtesy of Brian Kennedy (King’s College London),Susan Smith (Daresbury), and Yanwei Liu (LBNL)
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherernce; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_ESRF_highβ_Feb07.ai
6.0 GeV, 200 mAλu = 42 mm, N = 380 ≤ K ≤ 2.1σx = 395 µm, σx′ = 11 µrσy = 9.9 µm, σy′ = 3.9 µrη + 10%(high beta)
Photon Energy (eV)
n = 1
n = 3λ
∆λ= 103
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (keV)
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 38
0 5 10 15 20 25
104103104103
P coh
, N (m
W)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
15
10
5
0
0
5
10
15
0
20
40
60
n = 1
n = 3
Coherent Power at ESRF
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_APS_Feb07.ai
7.00 GeV, 100 mAλu = 33 mm, N = 720.5 ≤ K ≤ 3.0σx = 320 µm, σx′ = 23 µrσy = 50 µm, σy′ = 7 µrη = 10%
0 10 20 30 400
5
10
15
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
2
4
6
104103 105 103 104 105
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (eV)
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)
APS
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 1
n = 3
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 72 λ∆λ
= 103
Coherent Power at the APS
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007
Ch08_SPring8_Feb07.ai
8 GeV, 100 mAλu = 32 mm, N = 1400 ≤ K ≤ 2.46σx = 393 µm, σx′ = 15.7 µrσy = 4.98 µm, σy′ = 1.24 µrη = 10%
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
n = 1
n = 3
λ∆λ
= 103λ∆λ
= 140
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
5
10
15
20
0
5
10
15
20
0
100
200
300
Photon Energy (eV)
Photon Energy (keV)
103 104 105
Photon Energy (eV)103 104 105
Pco
h, N
(mW
)
Pco
h, λ
/∆λ
(µW
)
Pce
n (W
)Coherent Power at SPring-8
Professor David AttwoodUniv. California, Berkeley Spatial and Temporal Coherence; Coherent Undulator Radiation, EE290F, 22 Feb 2007