Spatial patterns and effects of soil organic carbon on grain productivity assessment in China L. Ye 1 , H. T ang 2 , J. Z hu 2 , A. V erdoodt 1 & E. V an R anst 1 1 Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S8), 9000 Gent, Belgium, and 2 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhonguancun Nan Dajie, 100081 Beijing, China Abstract In this paper, we present an assessment of the content and effects of cropland soil organic carbon (SOC) on grain productivity at the national scale in China using a Web-based Land Evaluation Sys- tem. Homogeneous 5 km · 5 km grid data sets of climate, crop, soil and management parameters were created and grain production in 2005 was simulated. Attempts were made to incorporate SOC into the land evaluation procedure and to quantify the potential effects of SOC deficiency on grain productivity. Results were statistically analysed and the modelling approach was validated. National cropland SOC maps were generated. At the national scale, the cropland SOC content averaged 1.20, 0.58, 0.41, 0.31 and 0.26% for the five 20-cm sections consecutively from the surface downwards. At the regional scale it tended to decline slightly from northeast (1.63%) to southwest (1.11%). On aver- age, 64% of grain yield was lost due to SOC deficiency for the humid provinces and 7% for the arid and sub-arid ones. Soil management options are suggested based on the simulation results. Keywords: Soil organic carbon, grain productivity, land evaluation, China Introduction In 2005, in China grain crops of rice, wheat, maize, millet, sorghum, etc. occupied 78% of the sown area of all food crops (i.e. grain plus pulse, root and tuber crops) and pro- duced 88% of the total food production. The average unit yield of grain crops was 5187 kg ha )1 which was 566 kg ha )1 higher than that of food crops. The grains are the primary source of food and play the most important role in food security in China. Climate, soil, crop performance and management practices are the four most important factors that influence grain pro- ductivity. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is among a range of soil characteristics essential for crop growth. Many aspects, espe- cially geographical patterns and storage of SOC in China, as well as correlation to grain productivity, have been studied at the national (Wu et al., 2003b; c; Zhou et al., 2003; Tang et al., 2006) or regional scale (Liu et al., 2006). Although the SOC–grain productivity relationship was reported in many cases as positive (Fan et al., 2005), negative observations (Cai & Qin, 2006) were not negligible. We attempt to reveal the rationale by which the effect of SOC on grain productiv- ity should be assessed in a comprehensive approach. In par- ticular, this paper focuses on (i) the content of the cropland SOC in China and its spatial patterns, (ii) the role of SOC in grain productivity assessments and the way to integrate it into a broader process of land evaluation based on limita- tions and (iii) the effects of SOC on the productivity of grain crops, individually or collectively. Materials and methods Inventory of croplands The ‘farmland’ and ‘mosaic cropping’ classes were extracted from the GLC2000 land cover map (Wu et al., 2003a) and put into the target map of cropland (Figure 1a). The latter was then projected from WGS84 to Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area coordinate system, and its spatial resolution was downscaled to homogeneous 5 km · 5 km. The spatial distri- bution of popular cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa), wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) is shown in Figure 1b. Data manipulation The study area was divided into 808 rows by 963 columns of grid cells, each of 25 km 2 . A unique serial number, running Correspondence: E. Van Ranst. E-mail: [email protected]Received June 2007; accepted after revision September 2007 Soil Use and Management, March 2008, 24, 80–91 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00136.x 80 ª 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation ª 2008 British Society of Soil Science
12
Embed
Spatial patterns and effects of soil organic carbon on grain productivity assessment in China
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Spatial patterns and effects of soil organic carbon ongrain productivity assessment in China
L. Ye1 , H. Tang
2 , J . Zhu2 , A. Verdoodt
1 & E. Van Ranst1
1Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S8), 9000 Gent, Belgium, and 2Institute of
Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhonguancun Nan Dajie,
100081 Beijing, China
Abstract
In this paper, we present an assessment of the content and effects of cropland soil organic carbon
(SOC) on grain productivity at the national scale in China using a Web-based Land Evaluation Sys-
tem. Homogeneous 5 km · 5 km grid data sets of climate, crop, soil and management parameters
were created and grain production in 2005 was simulated. Attempts were made to incorporate SOC
into the land evaluation procedure and to quantify the potential effects of SOC deficiency on grain
productivity. Results were statistically analysed and the modelling approach was validated. National
cropland SOC maps were generated. At the national scale, the cropland SOC content averaged 1.20,
0.58, 0.41, 0.31 and 0.26% for the five 20-cm sections consecutively from the surface downwards. At
the regional scale it tended to decline slightly from northeast (1.63%) to southwest (1.11%). On aver-
age, 64% of grain yield was lost due to SOC deficiency for the humid provinces and 7% for the arid
and sub-arid ones. Soil management options are suggested based on the simulation results.
Keywords: Soil organic carbon, grain productivity, land evaluation, China
Introduction
In 2005, in China grain crops of rice, wheat, maize, millet,
sorghum, etc. occupied 78% of the sown area of all food
crops (i.e. grain plus pulse, root and tuber crops) and pro-
duced 88% of the total food production. The average unit
yield of grain crops was 5187 kg ha)1 which was 566 kg ha)1
higher than that of food crops. The grains are the primary
source of food and play the most important role in food
security in China.
Climate, soil, crop performance and management practices
are the four most important factors that influence grain pro-
ductivity. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is among a range of soil
characteristics essential for crop growth. Many aspects, espe-
cially geographical patterns and storage of SOC in China, as
well as correlation to grain productivity, have been studied
at the national (Wu et al., 2003b; c; Zhou et al., 2003; Tang
et al., 2006) or regional scale (Liu et al., 2006). Although the
SOC–grain productivity relationship was reported in many
cases as positive (Fan et al., 2005), negative observations
(Cai & Qin, 2006) were not negligible. We attempt to reveal
the rationale by which the effect of SOC on grain productiv-
ity should be assessed in a comprehensive approach. In par-
ticular, this paper focuses on (i) the content of the cropland
SOC in China and its spatial patterns, (ii) the role of SOC in
grain productivity assessments and the way to integrate it
into a broader process of land evaluation based on limita-
tions and (iii) the effects of SOC on the productivity of grain
crops, individually or collectively.
Materials and methods
Inventory of croplands
The ‘farmland’ and ‘mosaic cropping’ classes were extracted
from the GLC2000 land cover map (Wu et al., 2003a) and
put into the target map of cropland (Figure 1a). The latter
was then projected from WGS84 to Lambert Azimuthal
Equal Area coordinate system, and its spatial resolution was
downscaled to homogeneous 5 km · 5 km. The spatial distri-
bution of popular cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa), wheat
(Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) is shown in
Figure 1b.
Data manipulation
The study area was divided into 808 rows by 963 columns of
grid cells, each of 25 km2. A unique serial number, runningCorrespondence: E. Van Ranst. E-mail: [email protected]
Received June 2007; accepted after revision September 2007
Soil Use and Management, March 2008, 24, 80–91 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00136.x
80 ª 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation ª 2008 British Society of Soil Science
R U S S I A
MONGOLIA
KAZAKSTAN
MYANMAR
LAOSTHAILAND
VIETNA
M
PHILIPPINES
N. KOREA
S. KOREA
SouthChinaSea
EastChinaSea
YellowSea
0 500 1000250
Kilometers
Legend
River, lake
Urban area
Mosaic cropping (3%)
Farmland (97%)
80°E 90°E 100°E 110°E 120°E
40°N
30°N
20°N
70°E
(a)
(b)
70°E 80°E 90°E 100°E 110°E 120°E 130°E 140°E50°N
40°N
30°N
20°N
50°N
Rice Wheat
Maize
0 30001500Kilometers
Northern rice
Early and late rice
Early, interm. & late rice
Spring wheat
Winter wheat
Spring & winter wheat
Spring maize
Summer maize
Figure 1 Map of cropland in China in 2000 (a) and spatial distribution of grain crops and cultivars (b).
Soil OC effects on grain productivity assessment 81
ª 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation ª 2008 British Society of Soil Science, Soil Use and Management, 24, 80–91
from 1 at the upper left to 778 104 at the lower right corner of
the coverage, was assigned to every cell. This cell number was
used as an index to store the climatic, soil, crop and manage-
ment data in a SQL Server 2000 database for easy and fast
access. The dataset collected and required by the Web-based
Land Evaluation System (WLES) for model run is summa-
rized in Table 1. The crop, soil and management parameters
were first geo-referenced, projected and then rasterized to
Arc ⁄ Info GRID format with 5 km · 5 km as the resolution.
The climatic data set was derived from 374 stations (IAP &
CDIAC, 1991; ISSAS & ISRIC, 1994; WMO, 1996) to provide
a representative cover for the study area (Figure 2a). Due to
the multi-source, multi-density nature of the point datasets,
climatic parameters were interpolated to generate continuous
surfaces of 5 km · 5 km cells using ordinary kriging (ESRI,
2001). Figure 2b shows the annual reference evapotranspira-
tion (ETo), summed from monthly subdivisions that were
calculated from these generated climatic surfaces. Spatial
patterns of high-low ETo values were found to match
climatic, ecological and topographical conditions.
The soil dataset was extracted and converted from the
ISRIC-WISE database of 5¢ · 5¢ (Batjes, 1997, 2002a) basedon an inventory of the FAO soil units in China (FAO, 1999)
correlated to the revised Legend (FAO-UNESCO-ISRIC,
1990). WISE is intrinsically profile-based. A locally represen-
tative soil profile was linked at the very beginning by native
experts, with each FAO soil unit within the original
0.5� · 0.5� grid cell of the Digital Soil Map of the World, on
which the unique soil mapping unit number (SNUM) was
based. The type and relative area of the component soil
units, including the dominant, associated and included units,
occurring at the centre of each 5 km · 5 km grid cell were
identified and characterized using FAO composing rules
FAO (1999). Priority had been given to local experts on esti-
mating missing values. The median of all soil units within
the same grouping was used as the last resort in filling
parameter gaps where local knowledge was unavailable. The
WISE data set was considered appropriate for SOC inven-
tories at the national (Batjes, 2004, 2005, 2006), continental
(Batjes, 2002b) and global (Batjes, 1996) scales. A grid cell
was viewed as a virtual soil profile of five equal sections of
20 cm down to 1 m. Crop physiological and phenological
data were arranged according to cropping system and
agro-ecological zones. The crop ID was used to link crop
parameters to crop rotations and the zone ID to attribute
geographical coordinates to cropping systems.
Assessment of grain productivity
The quantitative assessment of grain productivity was con-
ducted using WLES (http://weble.ugent.be) (Ye & Van
Ranst, 2004; Ye et al., 2004) as the evaluation engine which
uses a three-step, hierarchical, deterministic land evaluation
model (Ye & Van Ranst, 2002), based for specific crops on
the radiation regime (FAO, 1984), and the water-limited and
land production potentials (Sys et al., 1991; Tang et al.,
1992). The evaluation process was looped to iterate all the
778 104 grid cells with data retrieved from and results saved
in the database. The potential productivities were then analy-
sed and mapped.
The average productivities of rainfed (Yrain) and irrigated
(Yirri) grains were assessed using the following equations,
respectively:
Yrain ¼Xcropi¼ 0
Bn �HI � fW � Sy �My
� �i
ð1Þ
Yirri ¼Xcropi¼ 0
Bn �HI � Sy �My
� �i
ð2Þ
where Bn is the net biomass, HI harvest index, fW yield
reduction coefficient due to water stress, Sy soil index and
My management index. To calculate Sy, crop-specific soil
requirement tables (Sys et al., 1993) were used to obtain rat-
ing values of (i) CEC-soil, SOC and the more limiting one
between pH-H2O and exchangeable S(Ca2++Mg2++K+)
for regions of LGP ‡ 120 days (FAO, 1996), or (ii) CaCO3,
gypsum and the more limiting one between EC and ESP for
regions of LGP < 120 days where LGP is length of growing
period. The soil requirements for summer maize, for exam-
ple, are given in Table 2. The Sy was achieved as the product
of the rating values:
Sy ¼Yi
Ri
100
� �ð3Þ
where R is the rating of a soil parameter with a value 0–100.
The My was assigned to a crop in relation to a particular
level of factor inputs (Table 3) which was defined on the
basis of the overall scores from correlation with factor inputs
(Table 4). The actual grain productivity (Y) was therefore
Table 1 Parameters required by the WLES
Category Parameters
Climatic Tmax, Tmin, RH, P and frequency, daily sunshine
duration, wind speed
Crop Name and cultivar, leguminity, photosynthetic