Poh-chin LAI and Kim-hung KWONG Department of Geography The University of Hong Kong Spatial Analysis of the 2008 Influenza Outbreak of Hong Kong 23-26 March 2010
Jun 09, 2015
Poh-chin LAI and Kim-hung KWONGDepartment of Geography
The University of Hong Kong
Spatial Analysis of the 2008 Influenza
Outbreak of Hong Kong
23-26 March 2010
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 2
ContensContens
Background Methodology
Data Analytical methods
Results Maps of standard deviational ellipses Nearest neighbor distance statistics Grid-based spatial autocorrelation Kernel density maps
Observations and implications
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 3
BackgroundBackground
Hong Kong: flu outbreaks at schools, a hospital and a nursing home for the elderly since 6 March 2008
13 March 2008: suspended classes of all kindergartens, child care centers, and primary schools for two weeks
Measure to shut down all schools did lower the disease incidence but received mixed comments from the public
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 4
DataData
Three sets of data were compiled (6-13 March 2008): affected schools, non-affected schools, and background
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 5
Analytical Methods Analytical Methods (1)(1)
Statistically testing spatial patterns exhibited by case and control data
Used GIS techniques ArcGIS developed by ESRI GeoDA developed by Luc Anselin
Used a variety of different methods Standard deviational ellipses Nearest neighbor distance statistics Local indicators of spatial autocorrelation Kernel density maps
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 6
Results Results (1)(1)
Schools affected About 5.7 percent of the total More primary schools
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 7
Results Results (2)(2)
Standard deviational ellipses locations of mean and
weighted mean (adjusted by student population of each school) centers were indifferent
Infected cases
Control cases
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 8
Results Results (3)(3)
Nearest neighbor distance statistics
Control cases Infected cases Nearest Neighbor Observed Nearest Neighbor Observed Mean Distance = 112.11 Mean Distance = 648.92 Expected Mean Distance = 463.73 Expected Mean Distance
=1456.07 Nearest Neighbor Ratio = 0.24 Nearest Neighbor Ratio = 0.44Z Score = -64.66 Standard Deviations Z Score = -11.52 Standard
Deviations
more compact
Statistically significant clustering
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 9
Results Results (4)(4)
Spatial autocorrelation of quadrat counts
Point data about schools were aggregated into areal units of two different sizes 1 km x 1 km
500 m x 500 m Contains an average of 120 buildings per cell
Ignoring detailed locational information
Data masking to protect individual identity
Keeping the number of cells manageable for desktop computer operations
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 10
Results Results (5)(5)
1km x 1km cells A few patches of ‘high-high’ occurrences or hot spots Hot spots not extensive in their local coverage and
buffered by cells of ‘low-high’ values
1km x 1km Cells1km x 1km Cells
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 11
Results Results (6)(6)
500 m x 500 m cells Similar patterns to 1kmx1km but more
disjoint hot spots Manifests difference of cell sizes on visual
impact
500m x 500m Cells500m x 500m Cells
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 12
Results Results (7)(7)
Kernel density maps
bandwidth yields a smoother surface with low intensity levels
Too small a cell size defeats areal generalization
Cell size: 500m x 500m Cell size: 250m x 250mBandwidth: 1 km Bandwidth: 500 m
Cell size: 1 km x 1 km Cell size: 500m x 500mBandwidth: 1 km Bandwidth: 500 m
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 13
Observations Observations (1)(1)
Visual impression of hot spots projected by these maps were quite different even though cell sizes are the same
Kernel density surfaces appeared smoother and the patterns more contoured
Spatial autocorrelation reveals hot spots as a discrete category along with other categories not identifiable on a kernel density surface Pockets of hot spots buffered by spatial outliers
implied that the disease had remained localized
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 14
Implications Implications (1)(1)
Graphic, statistical, and spatial analyses work together to provide clues on clustering tendency and cluster areas
The degree of clustering should be evaluated with respect to the usually non-uniform population distribution
Geo-epidemiological models that enable the identification of disease variance in space can help guide interventions in areas with a higher disease burden
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 15
Implications Implications (2)(2)
A better understanding of spatial distribution of hot and cold spots would help formulate policies to target specific community groups e.g. movements of primary school students are
controlled to school districts thereby reducing cross district interaction
designated isolation of infected primary schools and schools around the hot spots will likely be an effective intervention measure
settings with less movement restrains (such as secondary schools and hospitals) may be modeled in similar fashion but ……
more radical intervention approach may be warranted
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 16
Implications Implications (3)(3)
Time lags between notification of suspected cases and confirmation of statutory notifiable diseases may distort counts more effective means of communication can
decrease the likelihood of disease transmission and possibly contain a potential flu pandemic
further opportunity to undertake cross-level interactions and how social mixing patterns might affect disease spread
Need for careful assessment of the aggregation level and comparison of different visualization and presentation techniques
Lai & Kwong, HKU Geography, 2010 17
More InformationMore Information
Please contact
Dr. P.C. LaiAssociate ProfessorDepartment of GeographyThe University of Hong KongEmail: [email protected]: (852) 2859 2830Fax: (852) 2559 8994