@txtbks Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition www.sparc.arl.org @SPARC_NA #openeducationwk #sparcOEW Libraries Leading the Way on OER A Free SPARC Webcast March 13, 2014 Moderator: Nicole Allen (@txtbks), Director of Open Education for SPARC
65
Embed
SPARC Webcast: Libraries Leading the Way on Open Educational Resources
This webcast features three librarians who have been leading OER projects on their campuses. Each will provide an overview of the project, discuss the impact achieved for students, and provide practical tips and advice for other campuses exploring OER initiatives.
Marilyn Billings, Scholarly Communication & Special Initiatives Librarian, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries. Marilyn coordinates the Open Education Initiative, which has saved students more than $750,000 since 2011 by working with faculty to identify low-cost and free alternatives to expensive textbooks.
Kristi Jensen, Program Development Lead, eLearning Support Initiative, University of Minnesota Libraries. The University of Minnesota has emerged as a national leader through its Open Textbook Library, which is a searchable catalog of more than 100 open textbooks. The Libraries also partnered with other entities on campus for their Digital Course Pack project, which has helped streamline the course pack process and make materials more affordable for students.
Shan Sutton, Associate University Librarian for Research and Scholarly Communication, Oregon State University Libraries. The OSU libraries are partnering with the OSU Press for a pilot program to develop open access textbooks by OSU faculty members. The program issued an RFP in the fall, and recently announced four winning proposals that will be published in 2014-2015.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Two one-hour workshops reviewing available Open Educational Resources and library licensed resources: 1) library, partners; 2) faculty
Individual consulting sessions for faculty with Scholarly Communication and subject liaison librarians, IT staff and others as needed
Topics covered: OER availability, copyright and licensing issues, Creative Commons licenses, accessibility concerns, creating a sustainable curriculum with OERs, managing resources in the LMS, assistance with creation of new content
Faculty OEI Support
Faculty Award Letter
Liaison Assignment
Peer-Review by IT Minor academic program faculty
Consultation with partners prior to award
April 23, 2012 Living the Future Conference
16
Faculty Proposal Development
Basic course information List current textbook(s) and cost, plus number of students Narrative (500 words) ID alternative sources - workshop, liaisons Evaluation of course – outcomes, value of
alternative resources, sustainability Anticipated start date Participation in follow-up assessment
OEI Summary 2011-13, Rounds 1-3
Over 30 faculty participants, 44 courses• Humanities• Social Sciences• Sciences• Professional Schools
$46,000 invested, over $700,000 student savings for more than 5000 students
Demonstrated results!
We want more!!
Why the Academic Library?
Form a nexus of communication Create strategic partnerships
• Academic Computing, Center for Teaching and Faculty Development, Center for Educational Software Development, University Press and more
Promote Open Access initiatives Curate digital materials Provide expertise on metadata, author rights, fair
use rights, copyright Provide expertise on content, accessibility Provide education and workshops
Faculty Survey Results
• My teaching needs were met by the Open Educational Resources implemented in the course. (4.27)
• Student performance improved compared to past semesters
when a traditional textbook was used. (4.36) • Student engagement increased compared to past semesters
when a traditional textbook was used. (4.09)
On a scale of 1 to 5, 5 being the highest
Faculty Comments
Benefits
Convenience Enhanced functionality, reuse, mixing
• Full searching• Multimedia• Linking of references
Kristi Jensen, MLSProgram Development LeadeLearning Support Initiative
U of M Libraries
eLearning Team and Partners
• Shane Nackerud, Technology Lead, eLearning Support Initiative
• John Barneson, Web Developer• Nancy Sims, Copyright Program Librarian• Danika Stegman, Eelctronic Reserves Coordinator• David Ernst, CIO, College of Education and Human
Development• Dale Mossestad, Copyright Permissions Center• Bob Crabb, Martha Hoppe, Neil Olness – U of M Bookstore• Treden Wagoner, College of Education and Human
Development
Libraries eLearning Goals
• Student affordability• Lowered student and faculty frustration selecting and
• Streamline faculty processes related to course content - save faculty time
• Support for open education and open access initiatives• Contribute to U of M eLearning efforts as they develop
further• Provide guidance around copyright and IP concerns
Digital Coursepack Pilot
• Began with CEHD to support an iPad project and specific classes/instructors (Fall 2012).
• Expanded to include a variety of campus partners (Copyright Permissions, Bookstore).
• Includes a variety of content types including open content, library licensed content, royalty based content, fair use content, and faculty created content in one “online package.”
• Integrated into Moodle (CMS) environment.• Support services developing around open content and
other alternative course content.
Digital Courepack in Reserves Direct
Digital Coursepack in Moodle
Why focus on Open Textbooks?
Informal Faculty Survey by the Libraries related to Course Content in Fall 2013 indicates that:• ~2/3 of Faculty surveyed still use a traditional textbook• Over 2/3 of Faculty surveyed are willing to consider an
open textbook as an alternative to their current course content – but many commented they need to learn more about open textbooks – what they are, how to use them, etc.
Open Textbooks and the CEHD Pilot
• Answering the question – What is keeping faculty from adopting Open Textbooks?
• Identify barriers and develop tools and strategies to address the barriers.
• Faculty don’t know:– what open textbooks are– how to find open textbooks– the quality of open textbooks– have little sense of urgency for change
What did we do?
• Develop resources to help faculty who might be interested– Open Textbook Library (open.umn.edu)– Faculty development program– Engagement strategy
University of Minnesota
A small pilot (10 faculty) has potentially saved students nearly
$200,000
since Fall 2012.
Developing a Model
Next Steps
• Held a workshop for Librarians, Academic Technologists, Instructional Designers on February 20th.
• Campus wide faculty workshop at University of Minnesota on March 27th.
• Share strategies and lessons learned with others – Hewlett Grant funds working at 7 other institutions.
• Developing a toolkit of resources to support others running Open Textbook programs.
What Can You Do?
• Educate your faculty about Open Textbooks and Educational Resources.
• Advocate for the review of Open Textbooks by faculty at your institution.
• Implement an Open Textbook Program at your school or on your campus.