Top Banner
GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
20

Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS)

show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Page 2: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Earthquakes in California & Nevada, 1970-2003

Page 3: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

The San Andreas is NOT “the PAC-NA plate boundary.”

This diagram applies at the

latitude of Bakersfield or

San Luis Obispo.

Red arrow: predicted

motion: 50 mm/yrBlue arrows:

subsetsof the motion that

“add up” to the predicted motion.

.

predicted at latitude of central CA

(51 ± 3 mm/yr, N32W)

San Andreas fault zone(35 ± 4 mm/yr, N34W)

Basin & Range(12 ± 1 mm/yr, N35W)

discrepancy

0

10

20

30

40

102030

velocity of PAC to W (mm/yr = km/Ma)

32°

just like on a map

North

West

Page 4: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

23

94-8?

17-23

9>6

17 96

2-5?

17? 23?

15

7-10?1-3?

FarallonIslands

~Stockton

About 36 mm/yr happens on the San Andreas in central CA, but northwest of Hollister, things are a LOT messier.

The ~36 mm/yr must be divided up

on many faults. Geologists study

each to determineindividual rates.Let’s add up the slip

on faults along four paths to see

whether we’ve found the ~36

mm/yr.

Page 5: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Seismic Hazards and Risks

Seismic hazard: A natural process caused by an EQ

Seismic risk: The potential for casualties andproperty loss due to a seismic hazard or hazards.

Example 1: Landslide in built-up Los Gatos vs.landslide in the Sierra Nevada backcountry

Example 2: Tsunami at Los Angeles harbor vs. tsunami at the Big Sur coastline.

Page 6: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Surface rupture

Landslides

Dust & Disease

Tsunamis

Liquefacton & subsidence

Ground shaking

Natural Seismic Hazards

Page 7: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Surface RuptureEarth’s surface breaks and shif

Only affects construction built directly atop the fault.

Affects the smallest area of all the seismic hazards.

Includes creep and earthquakes.How could you evaluate the level of

riskdue to surface rupture?

ts at an active fault.

Page 8: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 9: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 10: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

LandslidesDownslope movement of Earth materials due to gravity

Most affect soil or loose sediment, but some affect rock.

May be triggered by earthquakes or heavy rainfall.

How could you evaluate the level of risk

due to landslide?

Page 11: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 12: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 13: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

TsunamiDestructive sea waves (NOT tidal waves)

Caused by processes that abruptly moves ocean water:

earthquake submarine volcanic eruptioncoastal/submarine landslide ET impact

Time of arrival can be predicted—public warnings

How could you evaluate the level of risk

due to tsunami?

Page 14: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Possible tsunami“run-up” zones

Page 15: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

LiquefactionAccompanies M6+ EQs.Water escape often causes the ground surface to subside.Subsidence can damage pipes, foundations, etc.How could you evaluate the level of

riskdue to liquefaction & subsidence?

Page 16: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 17: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Ground ShakingDue to passage of P, S, and surface waves

Ground type controls amplitude and duration of shaking:

Bedrock shakes least, shortestMud-rich soil shakes most, longest

How could you evaluate the level of risk

due to ground shaking?

Page 18: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 19: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.
Page 20: Spaced-based measurements (VLBI and GPS) show that PAC-NA motion in CA is ~50 mm/yr.

Effect of Ground Type on Shaking

Seismograms for a

M4 aftershockof the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.