Top Banner
Space Instrumentation
47

Space Instrumentation

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

ashlyn

Space Instrumentation. George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA Introduction (Basic Principles) Detectors Light Emitting Material ( Scintillators ) Electron Multipliers Semiconductor Detectors Cluster and Wind Experiments. Definition. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Space Instrumentation

Space Instrumentation

Page 2: Space Instrumentation

Definition

Page 3: Space Instrumentation

How do we measure these particles?

h

p+e-

Device Signal

Source

Page 4: Space Instrumentation

Short History

Page 5: Space Instrumentation
Page 6: Space Instrumentation

Early Imaging Device (Image Intensifier)

photocathode

photoelectron

………….........

Light

1000V

0V

Fluorescence screen

Lens

Signal processing

Page 7: Space Instrumentation

Early Image Intensifiers

Page 8: Space Instrumentation

Early Image Intensifier (cont’d)

Page 9: Space Instrumentation

Major Discovery

Page 10: Space Instrumentation

Dynodes

Page 11: Space Instrumentation

Continuous Electron Multiplier (CEM)

Page 12: Space Instrumentation

Detector (Modern)

Page 13: Space Instrumentation

Modern Image Intensifier

Page 14: Space Instrumentation

Principles of Detectors

Page 15: Space Instrumentation

Coulomb Interaction (Classical)

• During “collision”, moves very little, so electric field can be calculated (Not valid if V ~ ve).

• Calculate momentum acquired by electron, e-.

• Impulse acquired by the electron = (electrostatic force) (time of collision)

o

b

me

zeV

Δp= F∫ dt = F⊥∫ dt = ze2

b2

⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟

bV

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

Ion

Electron

Page 16: Space Instrumentation

Coulomb Interaction (Cont’d)

• As charged particles lose energy by electromagnetic interactions, electrons of the matter are raised to excited energy states.

- If to continuum, electron ionized (otherwise electrons excited)

• The rate of energy loss per unit of path length by ions

z = charge of the particle, n= number of e- /cm3, b = impact parameter. €

dEdx ⎛

⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ions

= 4πz2e4nmv2

⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟lnbmax

bmin

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

Page 17: Space Instrumentation

Energy loss of charged particles (Ions)

• Energy loss of heavy charged particle through matter is (H. Bethe)

where v and ze are velocity and charge of the primary particle, I is average ionization potential of the absorber (detector), and N and Z are the number density and atomic number of the absorber.

• For v << c, only first term in bracket significant.

• Equation valid for different types of charged particles if v >> vorbital of

electrons in absorber.• For v << c, dE/dx varies as 1/v2.

• Energy transfer maximum when charged particles have low energy and spends more time in the vicinity of electron in the matter.

• z2 dependence means particles with high z have larger energy loss

(dE/dx for He++ > p+).

dEdx

=−4πNZz2e4

mov2 ln2mov2

I−ln1−v2

c2

⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟−v2

c2

⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢

⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

Page 18: Space Instrumentation

Energy loss of meson in Cu

Page 19: Space Instrumentation

Energy loss of Ions through air

Page 20: Space Instrumentation

Range of ions

R= dEdx ⎛

⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟Eo

0∫

−1

dE

Si

Page 21: Space Instrumentation
Page 22: Space Instrumentation

dEdx

=−2πNZe4

mov2 ln mov2E2I 2(1−β 2)

−ln2(2 1−β 2 −1+β 2

⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢

⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

+(1−β 2)+18

(1− 1−β 2 )2)

dEdx

=−NEZ(Z+1)e4

137mo2c4

4ln 2Em

oc2

−43

⎢ ⎢ ⎢

⎥ ⎥ ⎥

Page 23: Space Instrumentation

Range of Electrons

R= dEdx ⎛

⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟Eo

0∫

−1

dE

backscatter straggle

Page 24: Space Instrumentation

Range of Electrons• Range similar in different material

Page 25: Space Instrumentation

Electron Backscattering

• When an electron hits an atom it can undergo a very large angle deflection, (can often scatter out of the material).

• Larger Z has more backscattering.

Page 26: Space Instrumentation

Electron Energy Loss by Radiation (Bremsstrahlung)

• Radiation loss (Bethe)

dEdx

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟=−NEZ(Z+1)e4

137mo2c4

4ln 2Em

oc2

− 43

⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟

• Presence of E and Z2 in the numerator indicates radiation losses important for high energy electrons and for material of high atomic number Z.

• For monoenergy electron, bremsstrahlung X-ray spectrum is continuous and extends to as high as the electron energy.

• Shown is 5.3 MeV electron on Au-W target

Page 27: Space Instrumentation

Energy loss electrons (Cont’d)• Total Loss

• Ratio

where E is in MeV and Z is the atomic number of the absorber.

• For Silicon, for example. Z~14. Radiation loss ~Collision loss when E ~ 50 MeV. For Pb, Z=82, so E ~8.5 MeV.

dEdx

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟= dE

dx

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟c

+ dEdx

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟r

dEdx

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟T

=

dEdx

⎛ ⎝ ⎜

⎞ ⎠ ⎟r

dEdx

⎛ ⎝ ⎜

⎞ ⎠ ⎟

c

≈ EZ700 Useful Formula

Page 28: Space Instrumentation

Photon interaction with Matter

Page 29: Space Instrumentation

Photon interaction with matter• Photoelectric effect: the photon kicks loose an electron. The energy of the electron is the incident photon energy minus the binding energy.

• Compton effect: the photon hits an electron and some of the energy is transferred but the photon keeps going.

• Pair production: the incident photon interaction in the matter creates electron positron pair.

• Each of these processes produces electrons (positrons) interacting with scintillators (matter) that emit photons (uv-visible) characteristic of the scintillator that the PMTs can “see.”

Page 30: Space Instrumentation

Photon Interaction-1

E=hν −Eb

σ=k× Z n

(hν )3.5

Page 31: Space Instrumentation

Photon Interaction-2

hν '= hν1+ hν

moc2 (1−cosθ)

Page 32: Space Instrumentation

Photon Interaction-3

E−+E

+=hν −m

oc2

Page 33: Space Instrumentation

Absorption coefficient in Si

Page 34: Space Instrumentation

Design a photon Instrument

• Designing an X- and -ray instrument requires taking into account all three interaction processes.

• For example, if the goal is to measure of X-ray energy spectra,

one needs to reduce Compton effect.

• Compton scattering degrades energy spectra.

• Here, x must be thick enough to capture the photon with good efficiency but thin enough to minimize the Compton interaction.

I = Ioe−(μ ph+μc+μ pp)x

Page 35: Space Instrumentation

Simulation Tools

Page 36: Space Instrumentation

Ion Simulation Software

Page 37: Space Instrumentation

CASINO Simulation

Page 38: Space Instrumentation

Protons in Silicon

dE/dx

Page 39: Space Instrumentation

Alpha particles in Silicon

Page 40: Space Instrumentation

CASINO -" monteCArloSImulationof electroNtrajectory in sOlids".

Page 41: Space Instrumentation

CASINO Simulation result in Si

Page 42: Space Instrumentation

Electrons in Silicon

Page 43: Space Instrumentation

The End

Page 44: Space Instrumentation

dEdx

=−2πNZe4

mov2 ln mov2E2I 2(1−β 2)

−ln2(2 1−β 2 −1+β 2

⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢

⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

+(1−β 2)+18

(1− 1−β 2 )2)

dEdx

=−4πNZz2e4

mov2 ln2mov2

I−ln1−v2

c2

⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟−v2

c2

⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢

⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

Page 45: Space Instrumentation

Empirical Formula for Energy loss

• Feather’s rule (electron)

R = 0.542E – 0.133 for E >0.8 MeV

in Al, but OK for other substance. R in gm/cm2, E in MeV.

For example, R~2 MeV/gm/cm2; 1 cm plastic scintillator will stop 2 MeV particles .

• Wilson’s formula (R. R. Wilson, 1951)

R = ln 2[1+E/(Ec ln2)]

Ec= 700/(Z+1.2) MeV defined as that energy at which the ionizatio loss = radiation energy loss.

Page 46: Space Instrumentation

Design a photon Instrument

I = Ioe−(μ ph+μc+μ pp)x

• Designing an X-ray instrument requires taking into account all three interaction processes. • For example, if the goal is to measure of X-ray energy spectra, must reduce Compton effect.• Compton scattering degrades energy spectra.

• Here, x must be thick enough to capture the photon with good efficiency but thin enough to minimize the Compton interaction.

Page 47: Space Instrumentation

TRIM/SRIM Ion Simulation