SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL REGIONAL LINKS: …az480170.vo.msecnd.net/6864e884-8313-4d1f-97b8-696c824cfd60/d… · Cummins, Inc. Columbus Mark St. Clair Mgr., Ohio Valley

SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

OCTOBER 2015

REGIONAL LINKS: GLOBAL CONNECTIONS

Conexus Indiana is the state’s advanced manufacturing

and logistics initiative, dedicated to making Indiana

a global leader in these high-growth, high-tech industries.

The mission of CILC is to work with a sense of urgency to

strengthen the logistics sector in Indiana by identifying and

acting on concrete opportunities for enhancement, which

better positions the State to grow existing business, attract

new business, and thereby create new jobs.

I

CONEXUS INDIANA SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

CHAIR

*Doug PratherPresidentRanger Enterprises, LLCSeymour

Jim BakerPrincipalBaker Commercial Real EstateJeffersonville

*Bob BlockerSr. VP, Sales & Customer ServiceAmerican Commercial LinesJeffersonville

Bill BoydManager, Business DevelopmentInland ServicesCeltic Logistics, The Celtic GroupLouisville, KY

Wendy Dant ChesserPresident & CEOOne Southern IndianaNew Albany

Matt ConradPlant ManagerLucas OilCorydon

Harold ForcePresidentForce Construction Company, Inc.Columbus(Multimodal, Chair)

John GoldmanPresidentLouisville & Indiana Railroad Co.Jeffersonville

*Cathy HaleCEOMadison RailroadMadison

Sandy HuffOffice ManagerHuff Contractors, Inc.West Harrison

Bob Koetter, Jr.PresidentKoetter ConstructionFloyds Knobs

Jorge LanzPrincipalJacobi, Toombs & Lanz, Inc.Louisville

Charles Latham IIGeneral ManagerTPG Mount Vernon Marine,Jeffersonville Barge ServiceUtica

John LinvilleVP, Supply ChainBatesville Casket Company, Inc.Batesville

Chuck LongManagerMG Rail - ConsolidatedGrain & Barge Co.Jeffersonville

Alan LowePresidentLowe’s Pellets & Grain, Inc.Greensburg

Stephen LukinovichPartnerMountjoy Chilton MedleyJeffersonville

Chuck MoorePresidentEagle Steel Products, Inc.Jeffersonville(Workforce Dev., Chair)

*John MooreOwnerPackaging & Logistics Solutions, Inc.New Albany

Kim MoranTerminal ManagerTanco Clark MaritimeJeffersonville

James NobbeFleet Manager, Rail Equipment GroupThe David J. Joseph Co.Cincinnati, OH

Scott RedelmanMgr, Production ControlToyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.Columbus

Jeff ShiremanPartnerJames L. Shireman, Inc.Corydon

*Noah SodrelPresident & CEOSodrel Truck Lines, Inc.Jeffersonville

II

*Steve SpauldingVP, Engine Business Purchasing and Supply ChainCummins, Inc.Columbus

Mark St. ClairMgr., Ohio Valley RegionConsolidated Grain & Barge Co.Jeffersonville

Kerry StemlerPresident & CEOKM Stemler Company, Inc.New Albany

Scott StewartPort DirectorPorts of Indiana - JeffersonvilleJeffersonville

David SummittOwner & PresidentSummitt TruckingClarksville(Public Awareness, Chair)

Tom TyraDir., Marketing & Air Service DevelopmentLouisville Regional Airport AuthorityLouisville, KY

Shorty WhittingtonPresidentGrammer Industries, Inc.Grammer(Public Policy, Chair)

Patti YountJeffersonville Office ManagerLochmueller GroupJeffersonville

* Conexus Indiana Logistics Council Member

III

IV

Regional Links: Global Connections was created by leading members of the logistics users community through Southeast Indiana.

The logistics community, made up of the four modes of transportation including air, rail, truck, and water, and advanced manufacturing, infrastructure, service providers, and warehouse/distribution companies, gathered and agreed unanimously on the key opportunities of commonality. The Conexus Indiana Logistics Council, partnering with regional economic groups and chambers of commerce in Southeast Indiana (including One Southern Indiana) created the Southeast Regional Logistics Council (SERLC) and was the catalyst in creating the forum of logistics executives to discuss issues affecting our industries and building a common agenda across all logistics sectors, including both private and public. By achieving alignment of priorities in the areas of infrastructure, public policy and workforce development, Southeast Indiana will be able to maximize short- and long-term success for the logistics sector in this region.

The logistics industry claims ownership of Regional Links: Global Connections, ensuring that items necessary for the Southeast Region’s success are in place to enhance the environment for companies to grow their business, create a more attractive business climate to locate in Southeast Indiana, and create high paying jobs for citizens in our region.

If the strategies, goals and tactics developed in this plan are implemented by the private and public sectors, the Southeast Region will continue to grow its reputation for logistics and ensure its future success.

The countless hours and dedication of the volunteer executives from the Southeast Regional Logistics Council (SERLC) provide the Conexus Indiana Logistics Council (CILC), the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), the Ports of Indiana, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation, and the regional and local economic groups and chambers of commerce with a strong foundation to make the goals outlined in this plan a reality. Conexus Indiana and the regional and local economic groups and chambers of commerce will carry out these initiatives and will drive the implementation of the tactics necessary to ensure the plan’s success.

We look forward to continuing the conversations on opportunities for the logistics sector in the Southeast Region that we might have missed, and will continue our work by updating the plan on a regular basis, This “living breathing document” will continue creating innovation, engagement and vision ensuring economic results and impact for our region.

Respectfully,

Doug Prather President, Ranger Enterprises, LLCChair, Southeast Regional Logistics Council

LETTER FROM CONEXUSSOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL CHAIR

V

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1

PROBLEM STATEMENT ..............................................................................................1

MISSION STATEMENT .............................................................................................1

OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................2

LOGISTICS STRATEGIES ....................................................................................3

INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS .........................................................................................3

PUBLIC POLICY GOALS .............................................................................................4

PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS .....................................................................................4

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ........................................................................4

IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS ............................................................................5

INFRASTRUCTURE .....................................................................................................5Regional Tactics .....................................................................................................5 Local Tactics ..........................................................................................................9

PUBLIC POLICY ......................................................................................................41

PUBLIC AWARENESS ..............................................................................................41

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................42

LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS ....................................................................43

TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSIS .............................................................43

PUBLIC POLICY SWOT ANALYSIS .............................................................................47

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT ANALYSIS ........................................................51

PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT ANALYSIS .....................................................................52

SOUTHEAST REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA ...........................................................53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

The Conexus Indiana Southeast Regional Logistics Council (SERLC) is a forum of 32 logistics executives and thought leaders from throughout Southeast Indiana representing the following logistics sectors: air, infrastructure, rail, trucking, warehousing/distribution, waterborne, advanced manufacturing and services firms. Logistics users are manufacturers, distributors/warehousing, and third-party providers.

SERLC is working to:

◆◆ Enhance the environment for companies in advanced manufacturing and logistics to grow their business, taking advantage of Indiana’s position at the heart of the global supply chain;

◆◆ Create a more attractive environment for manufacturing and logistics companies to relocate to or expand in the Southeast Region, thereby creating jobs and increasing State and local revenue; and

◆◆ Create high paying jobs for Hoosiers – the average wage of Indiana manufacturing and logistics jobs is more than 33 percent higher than the State’s median income.

PROBLEM STATEMENTThe Southeast Region’s transportation network has opportunities for improvement due to transportation “bottlenecks,” lack of direct rail service, underutilized air facilities with little international freight movement, lack of efficient mode-to-mode connectivity (e.g. road to rail, road to water, road to air, rail to water), a decaying lock and dam infrastructure, and lack of dredging that prohibits barges/ships to maximize capacity. This disconnect has created higher costs, potential environmental impacts, inefficient freight movement, loss of productivity for Southeast Region business, and safety impacts.

MISSION STATEMENTThe mission of the Southeast Regional Logistics Council is to create, enhance and maximize unique opportunities for the logistics industry (air, rail, truck, water, warehouse/distribution) in the Southeast Region.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

2

OBJECTIVES

1. Executive Forum: Provide a forum for Southeast Region logistics executives to discuss issues affecting the industry;

2. Infrastructure: Develop a comprehensive plan to strengthen the Southeast Region’s public and private logistics infrastructure;

3. Public Awareness: Develop paid and earned media to promote the sector;

4. Public Policy: Identify State and Federal public policy areas that impact the logistics industry, and work with State and Federal thought leaders from government, academia and associations to enhance the sector;

5. Workforce Development: Develop and implement strategies to build the human capital needed to support the growing demand for logistics services through innovative workforce programs in the Southeast Region.

3

◆◆ Increase the flow of goods originating, terminating, and adding value within the Southeast Region over the next five years, thereby creating an increase of net new jobs and growing the logistics sector.

◆◆ Provide a broad-based forum consisting of Southeast Region business executives throughout the logistics industry for collectively vetting critical relevant logistics public policy issues of commonality, therefore optimizing the business climate.

◆◆ Strengthen and grow the logistics qualified workforce in the Southeast Region by creating portable skills curricula leading to academic degrees/certifications that will increase the pipeline of qualified workers over the next five years.

◆◆ Increase the public’s awareness of the importance of the logistics industry on the Southeast Region’s economy.

INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS

1. Reduce bottlenecks in the Southeast Region to improve the reliability and efficiency of freight movement leading to less congestion, reduced infrastructure repairs, and lower emissions.

2. Ensure global access by connecting Southeast Region cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.

3. Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports via roads and rail modes and improve the reliability and efficiency of water freight movement to and from the Southeast Region.

4. Develop a fast and efficient process for unplanned economic development infrastructure needs.

5. Develop and implement transportation networks that provide direct rail, truck access and air cargo expansion leading to the improvement and establishment of multimodal and intermodal service and air cargo facilities.

LOGISTICS STRATEGIES

4

PUBLIC POLICY GOALS

1. Ensure Federal, State, and local Government do not legislate or regulate barriers to the safe, efficient, and innovative movements of goods and resources that are necessary to support the growth of the logistics sector.

2. Ensure Federal, State, and local Government provide the necessary funding for the public infrastructure needed to support the efficient and cost effective operation of the Southeast Region’s logistics sector.

3. Ensure SERLC is recognized by governmental entities as a resource of first resort and the voice for the logistics industry within the Southeast Region.

PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS

1. Develop brand awareness of SERLC.

2. Create general public understanding of logistics by ensuring that the population has a basic understanding of logistics.

3. Increase the perception of the need to improve/expand the Southeast Region’s infrastructure.

4. Highlight the Southeast Region’s logistics companies by bringing awareness to their products and services.

5. Increase the public’s understanding of the positive impact of global trade on the Southeast Region’s economy and jobs.

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

1. Increase the skill levels of the Southeast Region’s logistics workers through workforce education programs.

2. Increase the upward mobility and job prospects of current and future Southeast Region logistics workers.

5

REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING SERLC INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING AVIATION GOALS

◆◆ Air Cargo Volume Study: Conduct a private sector study on air cargo volume for integrated and non-integrated freight and air passenger travel, with the long-term objective of maximizing the use of air capacity

◆ REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS

PROJECT # COUNTY SOUTHEAST REGIONAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4

1008 Bartholomew, Clark, Jackson, Scott I-65 Additional Lanes

1009 Bartholomew, Clark, Jackson, Scott Indianapolis to Louisville Rail Line Upgrade

1010 Clark Ohio River Bridges

1011 Clark Ports of Indiana Jeffersonville

2204 Floyd Sherman Minton Bridge Reconstruction

3101 Floyd, Harrison I-64 Additional Lanes

3904/6903 Decatur, Franklin, Jefferson, Ripley US 421 Additional Lanes

6506 Out of State Olmsted Lock Reconstruction

7202 Jefferson, Scott Madison Connector

2202 Floyd, Harrison SR 111 Improvements

2203 Floyd, Harrison, Washington US 150 Road Improvements

3605 Jackson, Jennings US 50 Road Improvements

7801 Decatur, Ripley, Switzerland Kentuckiana Corridor

8801 Clark, Washington SR 60 4-Lane Highway

IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS

o

o

!

!

!!!

!

!

!!!¹º»¼

¹º»¼

!

!

!

¹º»¼

!

¬«211

¬«462

¬«42

¬«750

¬«148

¬«203

¬«144

¬«235

¬«362

¬«356

¬«67

¬«335

¬«337

¬«252

¬«45

¬«121

¬«258¬«262

¬«39

¬«446

¬«129 ¬«101

¬«160

¬«37

¬«1

¬«7

¬«244

¬«350

¬«229

¬«250

¬«48

¬«256

¬«60

¬«9

¬«11

¬«46

¬«44

¬«58

¬«62

¬«135

¬«3

¬«56

£¤27

£¤421

£¤150

£¤52

£¤50£¤31

§̈¦265

§̈¦64

§̈¦74

§̈¦65

MONROE

LAWRENCE

U N I O N

B A R T H O L O M E W

C L A R K

J O H N S O N

S C O T T

S W I T Z E R L A N D

ORANGE

MORGAN

J E F F E R S O N

J E N N I N G S

D E A R B O R N

W A S H I N G T O N

B R O W N

J A C K S O N

H A R R I S O N

R I P L E Y

R U S H

O H I O

F R A N K L I N

CRAWFORD

F L O Y D

S H E L B Y

D E C A T U R

F A Y E T T E

6902

7801

3610

3610

1603

2402

7201

3605

03033905

4001

1502

8802

7204

1504

0304

1010

7802

6901

1002

7202

2202

3904

1503

7801

8801

2401

3606

3906

1501

3101

2203

6903

8801

1008

1008

1009

1009

1604

3602

0306

3608

7205

3104

1007

0307

1006

Ü0 105

Miles

Date: 9/8/2015

Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter

Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region

IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State FacilitiesMobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)

State Facility

New Terrain, StateFacility

Local Facility

New Terrain, LocalFacility

New Rail Capacity(new rail line or addedcapacity)

OperationalImprovements(Intersectionimprovements, newinterchange, interchangemodification, and spotimprovements)

! State Facility

! Local Facility

¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement

Multi-ModalEnhancements

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements

Other FacilitiesNon-Interstate

Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits

Data; Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management

Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportationinfrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholdersfor graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposesonly. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identifyoptimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decisionmaking. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at thetime and is subject to change.

State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that canuse state or local funds.

2204

7

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING INTERSTATE/HIGHWAY GOALS

◆◆ Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of the Interstate to a minimum of 6 lanes. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $2.086 billion

◆◆ Project 1010: Ohio River Bridges – Develop a partnership between Indiana and Kentucky to build two new bridges between Jeffersonville, Indiana, and Louisville, Kentucky, and reconfigure Louisville’s Kennedy interchange design and build two bridges from Jeffersonville, Indiana, to Louisville, Kentucky. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 2202: SR 111 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 111 from New Boston to Main Street in New Albany. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion and safety on SR 111 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $60.8 million

◆◆ Project 2203: US 150 Road Improvements – Convert US 150 from 2 lanes to 3 lanes from Buck Creek Road at Galena to French Lick. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on US 150 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $339 million

◆◆ Project 2204: Sherman Minton Bridge Reconstruction – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the Sherman Minton Bridge along I-64. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on I-64 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: Not Available

◆◆ Project 3101: I-64 Additional Lanes – Convert from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from State Line to Corydon. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-64 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 3605: US 50 Improvements – Convert US 50 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from US 31 to the North Vernon Bypass. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


8

◆◆ Project 3904/6903: US 421 Additional Lanes – Convert US 421 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from I-71 at Exit 34 in Kentucky to I-74 at Exit 132 in Indiana. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 421 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $235.9 million/$233.1 million

◆◆ Project 7202: Madison Connector – Reconstruct and widen SR 256 as a 4-lane expressway between I-65 in Austin and SR 56/62 near Madison. Reason: Ensure global access by connecting cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.


◆◆ Project 7801: Kentuckiana Corridor – Convert SR 129 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from SR 56 to I-74. Reason: Create economic development with direct connection to industries creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 8801: SR 60 4-Lane Highway – Upgrade the existing 2-lane highway to a 4-lane highway from I-65 to SR 37. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on SR 60 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING RAIL GOALS

◆◆ Project 1009: Indianapolis to Louisville Rail Lane Upgrade – Support the Louisville & Indiana Railroad rail line upgrades from Indianapolis to Louisville allowing 286,000 pound rail cars. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for heavier rail cargo shipments.


◆◆ Project 1011: Ports of Indiana/River Ridge Commerce Center Rail Connection – Connect the Ports of Indiana to River Ridge Commerce Center by constructing rail along the Transportation Corridor. Reason: Create economic development by allowing better multi-modal connectivity to the Ports of Indiana.


◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WATERBORNE GOALS

◆◆ Project 6506: Olmsted Lock Reconstruction – Replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53, known as the Olmsted Locks and Dam, which are under construction between Illinois and Kentucky upstream from the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Olmsted will replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53 and greatly reduce tow and barge delays through the busiest stretch of river in America’s inland waterways. Reason: Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports.


9

◆ LOCAL PRIORITY PROJECTS

PROJECT # COUNTY SOUTHEAST LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4

0301 Bartholomew SR 46/SR 11 Interchange Improvements and Rail Grade Separation (Overpass)

1007 Clark I-265/SR 62 Interchange

3609 Jackson US 50 Rail Grade Separation (with an overpass)

0307 Bartholomew Flat Rock River Rail Bridge Replacement

1001 Clark River Ridge Airport Connector

1002 Clark SR 62 Road Improvements

1503 Dearborn West Lawrenceburg Truck Corridor

3107 Harrison Louisville Connector Bridge

3601 Jackson South Seymour Truck Corridor

3603 Jackson US 50/I-65 Interchange Improvement

3604 Jackson US 50/US 31 Intersection Improvement

3610 Jackson Seymour Rail Intersection Improvements

3901 Jefferson US 421 Extension

3903 Jefferson SR 62/SR 256/SR 56 Intersection Improvement

4001 Jennings North Vernon Bypass

6901 Ripley US 50 Road Improvements

7205 Scott Industrial Rail Spur

0303 Bartholomew SR 58 Improvements

0304 Bartholomew North Side Columbus Truck Corridor

0305 Bartholomew North Marr Road Relocation

0306 Bartholomew Columbus Municipal Airport Runway Extension

1004 Clark Clark Regional Airport Control Tower

1501 Dearborn SR 1 Improvements

2401 Franklin SR 229 Improvements

2402 Franklin West Brookville Truck Corridor

3103 Harrison Landmark Avenue Northeast/SR 135 Intersection Improvements

10

PROJECT # COUNTY SOUTHEAST LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4

3602 Jackson East CR 340 North Rail Grade Separation

3606 Jackson SR 258 Improvements

3608 Jackson South Walnut Street Rail Grade Separation

3905 Jefferson Michigan/Milton Road Improvements

3906 Jefferson SR 62 Improvements

5801 Ohio SR 56 Improvements

6902 Ripley US 421 Improvements

7201 Scott US 31 Improvements

7204 Scott West Scottsburg Truck Corridor

7802 Switzerland SR 101 Extension

0302 Bartholomew Lowell Road Interchange

1006 Clark Old SR 403/US 31 Rail Grade Separation

1502 Dearborn Pribble Road Improvements

1504 Dearborn Wilson Creek Road Improvements

1601 Decatur East Barachel Lane/North Montgomery Road Intersection Improvements

1602 Decatur East Freeland Road/North Montgomery Road Intersection Improvements

1603 Decatur West CR 300 North Improvements

1604 Decatur North CR 80 Northeast Interchange

3102 Harrison Valley Road Truck Corridor

3104 Harrison SR 337 Interchange

3106 Harrison Harrison Way Northwest Railroad Improvements

7203 Scott South Lake Road South/CR 100 West Improvements

8802 Washington Salem Bypass Extension

11

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

301:

SR

46/S

R 11

Inte

rcha

nge

Impr

ovem

ents

an

d Ra

il G

rade

Sep

arat

ion

(Ove

rpas

s) –

Re-

engi

neer

, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

SR 4

6/SR

11

inte

rcha

nge

and

build

and

des

ign

a ra

il gr

ade

sepa

ratio

n (o

verp

ass)

at th

e Lo

uisv

ille

Indi

ana

Railr

oad.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottl

enec

k of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

0 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

302:

Low

ell R

oad

Inte

rcha

nge

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild

an in

terc

hang

e at

I-65

at L

owel

l Roa

d. R

easo

n: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent w

ith d

irect

con

nect

ion

to in

dustr

ies

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

0 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

303:

SR

58 Im

prov

emen

ts –

Exte

nd S

R 58

from

I-6

5 to

SR

7. T

his

conv

erts

Wes

t CR

450

Sout

h/Ea

st C

R 40

0 So

uth

to S

R 58

from

I-65

to S

R 7.

Rea

son:

Cre

ate

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t with

dire

ct c

onne

ctio

n to

indu

strie

s cr

eatin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$27

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

304:

Nor

th S

ide

Col

umbu

s Tr

uck

Cor

ridor

–

Des

ign

and

build

a n

ew ro

ad W

est o

f the

airp

ort f

rom

C

entra

l Ave

nue

to E

ast C

R 50

0 N

orth

/W

est C

R 50

0 N

orth

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pa

ssen

ger c

ar c

onge

stion

thro

ugh

Col

umbu

s cr

eatin

g be

tter

truck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$27.

4 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

305:

Nor

th M

arr R

oad

Relo

catio

n –

Re-e

ngin

eer,

reco

nfigu

re a

nd re

desig

n N

orth

Mar

r Roa

d fro

m A

rnol

d St

reet

to

Eas

t CR

500

Nor

th. R

easo

n: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

by a

llow

ing

for e

xpan

sion

of a

irpor

t Eas

t of N

orth

Mar

r Roa

d.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$ .2

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

306:

Col

umbu

s M

unic

ipal

Airp

ort R

unw

ay

Exte

nsio

n –

Con

vert

the

leng

th o

f the

runw

ay fr

om 6

,400

to

7,5

00 fe

et. R

easo

n: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent b

y al

low

ing

larg

er p

lane

s to

acc

ess

airp

ort.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

6.5

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

307:

Fla

t Roc

k Ri

ver

Rail

Brid

ge R

epla

cem

ent –

D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

new

repl

acem

ent r

ail b

ridge

ove

r the

Fl

at R

ock

Rive

r allo

win

g 28

6,00

0 po

und

rail

cars

. Rea

son:

C

reat

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent b

y al

low

ing

for h

eavi

er ra

il ca

rgo

ship

men

ts.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

Incl

uded

in re

gion

al p

roje

ct c

ost f

or

Proj

ect 1

009

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

9: In

dian

apol

is to

Lou

isvi

lle R

ail L

ine

Upg

rade

–

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

BA

RTH

OLO

MEW

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

!

!

¹º»¼

o

0305

0303

0304

1008

¬ «3¬ «750

¬ «135

¬ «252

¬ «135

¬ «9

¬ «58

¬ «11¬ «7

¬ «46

¬ «46

¬ «3

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

§̈ ¦65

Col

umbu

s

Jone

svilleC

liffo

rd

Hop

e

Edin

burg

h

Har

tsvi

lle

Eliz

abet

htow

n

0305

0303

03041009

10091008

1008

0302

0306

0307

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Bar

thol

omew

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

0301

13

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

CLA

RK

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

001:

Riv

er R

idge

Airp

ort C

onne

ctor

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

new

road

Wes

t of t

he a

irpor

t con

nect

ing

the

Rive

r Rid

ge C

omm

erce

Cen

ter.

Reas

on: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic

deve

lopm

ent w

ith d

irect

con

nect

ion

from

airp

ort t

o in

dustr

ies

in R

iver

Rid

ge C

omm

erce

Cen

ter c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Estim

ated

Cos

t: N

ot A

vaila

ble

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

002:

SR

62 R

oad

Impr

ovem

ents

– C

onve

rt SR

62

from

4 la

nes

to 6

lane

s fro

m S

R 3

at C

harle

stow

n to

I-2

65. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd

pass

enge

r car

con

gesti

on a

long

SR

62 c

reat

ing

bette

r tra

ffic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $6

7 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

004:

Cla

rk R

egio

nal A

irpor

t Con

trol T

ower

– B

uild

an

d de

sign

a ne

w c

ontro

l tow

er a

t the

Cla

rk R

egio

nal

Airp

ort.

Reas

on: S

afet

y of

airp

lane

s m

ovin

g ca

rgo

ensu

ring

effic

ient

air

traffi

c flo

w.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $4

.5 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

006:

Old

SR

403/

US

31 R

ail G

rade

Sep

arat

ion

–

Build

and

des

ign

a ra

il gr

ade

sepa

ratio

n at

the

Loui

sville

In

dian

a Ra

ilroa

d at

Old

US

403/

US

31. R

easo

n: S

afet

y of

tru

cks

mov

ing

carg

o en

surin

g ef

ficie

nt tr

affic

flow

in S

elle

rsbur

g.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

Not

Ava

ilabl

e

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

007:

I-26

5/SR

62

Inte

rcha

nge

– C

ompl

ete

desig

n an

d bu

ild o

f int

erch

ange

at I

-265

at S

R 62

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $6

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

9: In

dian

apol

is to

Lou

isvi

lle R

ail L

ine

Upg

rade

–

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

880

1: S

R 60

4-L

ane

Hig

hway

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pr

ojec

t refl

ecte

d on

the

map

on

page

6.

!

!

!

o

¬ «11

¬ «203

¬ «265

¬ «111

¬ «62

¬ «64

¬ «335

¬ «3

¬ «160

¬ «62

¬ «60

£ ¤150

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

§̈ ¦65

Jeffe

rson

ville

Selle

rsbu

rg

New

Prov

iden

ce

Utic

a

Cla

rksv

ille

Cha

rlest

own

1001

1013

1010

1002

1008

8801

1009

100910

07

1006

Ü 03.

51.

75M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/8/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Cla

rk C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

1010

3906

15

DEARBORN COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ Project 1501: SR 1 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 1 from US 50/I-275 to I-74 at Exit 164. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion and safety on SR 1 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo from Lawrenceburg to I-74.


◆◆ Project 1502: Pribble Road Improvements – Improve and widen Pribble Road from SR 1 to SR 48. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along SR 1 and SR 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 1503: West Lawrenceburg Truck Corridor – Design and build a West Lawrenceburg truck corridor from SR 56/US 50 at Aurora to US 50/SR 1 East of Lawrenceburg. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion through Lawrenceburg creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 1504: Wilson Creek Road Improvements – Improve and widen Wilson Creek Road from US 50 to SR 48. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ *Project 5801: SR 56 Improvements – This is a local project reflected in the Ohio County map on page 32.

* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.

5801

Aurora

Dillsboro

Lawrenceburg

St. Leon

Greendale

WestHarrison

MooresHill

¬«156

¬«56

¬«148

¬«62¬«262

¬«262

¬«350

¬«350

¬«46

¬«46

¬«101

¬«101

¬«1

¬«1

¬«48

¬«48

¬«56

1502

1504

1503

1501

£¤52

£¤50

£¤50

§̈¦275

§̈¦74

Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Dearborn County

Ü0 2.51.25

MilesCoordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter

Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regionaltransportation infrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholders for graphic representation. Use of this map should belimited to preliminary planning purposes only. Additional planning, environmentalstudy, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identify optimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decision making. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at the time and issubject to change.

Date: 9/1/2015IdentifiedEnhancementCategories for Localand State Facilities

Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)

State Facility


Local Facility


New Rail Capacity(new rail line oradded capacity)

Operational Improvements(Intersection improvement,new interchange,interchange modification,and spot improvements)

! State Facility

! Local Facility



o AirportImprovements


Other FacilitiesExisting Rail

Non-Interstate

Interstate

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can use state or local funds.

17

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

601:

Eas

t Bar

ache

l Lan

e/N

orth

Mon

tgom

ery

Road

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

– Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

an

d re

desig

n Ea

st Ba

rach

el L

ane/

Nor

th M

ontg

omer

y Ro

ad

inte

rsec

tion.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

an

d pa

ssen

ger c

ar tr

affic

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r th

e m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

602:

Eas

t Fre

elan

d Ro

ad/N

orth

Mon

tgom

ery

Road

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

– Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

an

d re

desig

n Ea

st Fr

eela

nd R

oad/

Nor

th M

ontg

omer

y Ro

ad

inte

rsec

tion.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

an

d pa

ssen

ger c

ar tr

affic

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r th

e m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

603:

Wes

t CR

300

Nor

th Im

prov

emen

ts –

Impr

ove

and

wid

en W

est C

R 30

0 N

orth

from

Old

US

421

to 2

nd

Stre

et in

Ada

ms.

Rea

son:

Cre

ate

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t by

prov

idin

g fro

ntag

e ro

ads

from

Gre

ensb

urg

indu

strie

s.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$3.8

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

604:

Nor

th C

R 80

Nor

thea

st In

terc

hang

e –

Des

ign

and

build

an

inte

rcha

nge

at I-

74 a

t Nor

th C

R 80

Nor

thea

st.

Reas

on: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent w

ith d

irect

co

nnec

tion

to in

dustr

ies

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for

the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$8 m

illion

◆◆

*Pro

ject

690

3: U

S 42

1 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

DEC

ATU

R C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

!!

!

¬ «121

¬ «46

¬ «7

¬ «48

¬ «350

¬ «129

¬ «9

¬ «46

¬ «46

¬ «229

¬ «3

£ ¤52

£ ¤421

§̈ ¦74

New

Poin

t

Gre

ensb

urg

St. P

aul

Millh

ouse

n

Wes

tpor

t1603

6903

1601

1602

1604

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Dec

atur

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

19

FLOYD COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 2202: SR 111 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ *Project 2203: US 150 Road Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ *Project 2204: Sherman Minton Bridge Reconstruction – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ *Project 3101: I-64 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.


!

!

Georgetown

Greenville

NewAlbany

¬«62

¬«403

¬«311

¬«335

¬«111

¬«64

¬«11

¬«62

¬«62

¬«111

¬«111

¬«60

¬«60

2204

2203

2202

3101

£¤31

£¤31

£¤150

£¤150

§̈¦64

§̈¦64

§̈¦265

§̈¦65

Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Floyd County

Ü0 21





State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Non-Interstate

Interstate

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits



21

FRA

NK

LIN

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

◆◆

Proj

ect 2

401:

SR

229

Impr

ovem

ents

– Im

prov

e an

d w

iden

SR

229

from

I-74

exi

t 149

to U

S 52

at M

etam

ora.

Rea

son:

Re

lieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er

cong

estio

n an

d sa

fety

on

SR 2

29 c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Estim

ated

Cos

t: $5

2.1

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 2

402:

Wes

t Bro

okvi

lle T

ruck

Cor

ridor

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

new

road

Wes

t of C

liff S

treet

alo

ng th

e In

dian

a &

O

hio

Railr

oad

line

from

US

52 N

orth

to U

S 52

Sou

th n

ear

Pear

l Stre

et. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n U

S 52

thro

ugh

Broo

kville

cr

eatin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$9 m

illion

¬ «1

¬ «101

¬ «244

¬ «129¬ «12

1

¬ «1

¬ «1

¬ «101

¬ «252

¬ «229

¬ «46

£ ¤52

£ ¤52

§̈ ¦74

Ced

arG

rove

Laur

el

Old

enbu

rg

Broo

kville

Mou

ntC

arm

el

24022401

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Fra

nklin

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

23

HARRISON COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 2202: SR 111 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ *Project 2203: US 150 Road Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ *Project 3101: I-64 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 3102: Valley Road Truck Corridor – Design and build a new road East of the Tyson Foods facility connecting to SR 62. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for expansion of industries.


◆◆ Project 3103: Landmark Avenue Northeast/SR 135 Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign Landmark Avenue Northeast/SR 135 intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic and safety creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $.5 million

◆◆ Project 3104: SR 337 Interchange – Design and build an interchange at I-64 at SR 337. Reason: Create economic development with direct connection to industries creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 3106: Harrison Way Northwest Railroad Improvements – Improve the Lucas Oil Railroad crossings on Harrison Way Northwest. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo.

Estimated Cost: .037 million

◆◆ Project 3107: Louisville Connector Bridge – Design and build a bridge from SR 111 to I-264 in Kentucky. Reason: Create economic development with direct connection to industries creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.



!!

Elizabeth

Lanesville

Laconia

NewAmsterdam

Mauckport

Corydon

NewMiddletown

Crandall

Palmyra

¬«62¬«62

¬«211

¬«462

¬«335

¬«335¬«66

¬«66

¬«337

¬«337

¬«111

¬«111

¬«64

¬«64

¬«11

¬«11

¬«135

¬«135

¬«66

¬«60

3103

3104

310231

06

2203

3101

£¤150

£¤150

§̈¦64

Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Harrison County

Ü0 3.51.75





State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Non-Interstate

Interstate

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits



2202

3107

25

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

JACK

SON

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

9: In

dian

apol

is to

Lou

isvi

lle R

ail L

ine

Upg

rade

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

601:

Sou

th S

eym

our

Truc

k C

orrid

or –

Des

ign

and

build

a

new

road

from

Bur

khar

t Bou

leva

rd to

US

50 o

n th

e W

est s

ide

of S

eym

our.

Reas

on: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd

pass

enge

r con

gesti

on o

n U

S 50

thro

ugh

Seym

our c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

1.7

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

602:

Eas

t CR

340

Nor

th R

ail G

rade

Sep

arat

ion

– Bu

ild

and

desig

n a

rail

grad

e se

para

tion

at th

e Lo

uisv

ille In

dian

a Ra

ilroa

d.

Reas

on: S

afet

y on

Eas

t CR

340

Nor

th c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$2 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

603:

US

50/I

-65

Inte

rcha

nge

Impr

ovem

ent –

Re-

engi

neer

, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

US

50 in

terc

hang

e at

I-65

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: N

ot A

vaila

ble

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

604:

US

50/U

S 31

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ent –

Re-

engi

neer

, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

US

50 in

ters

ectio

n at

US

31. R

easo

n:

Relie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

605:

US

50 R

oad

Impr

ovem

ents

– Th

is is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

606:

SR

258

Impr

ovem

ents

– Im

prov

e an

d w

iden

SR

258

from

Bel

l For

d D

rive

in S

eym

our t

o SR

58.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

onge

stion

and

saf

ety

on

SR 2

58 c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $5

3.8

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

608:

Sou

th W

alnu

t Stre

et R

ail G

rade

Sep

arat

ion

– Bu

ild a

nd

desig

n a

rail

grad

e se

para

tion

at C

SX tr

acks

. Rea

son:

Saf

ety

on S

outh

W

alnu

t Stre

et c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

0 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

609:

US

50 R

ail G

rade

Sep

arat

ion

(with

an

over

pass

) – B

uild

an

d de

sign

a ra

il gr

ade

sepa

ratio

n at

the

Loui

sville

& In

dian

a Ra

ilroad

rail

lines

at U

S 50

/Tip

ton

Stre

et in

Sey

mou

r. Re

ason

: Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on a

nd sa

fety

on U

S 50

/Tip

ton

Stre

et c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $6

5 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

610:

Sey

mou

r Ra

il In

ters

ectio

n Im

prov

emen

ts –

Redu

ce

the

num

ber o

f rai

l int

erse

ctio

ns in

Sey

mou

r fro

m 6

inte

rsec

tions

to

2. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

co

nges

tion

and

safe

ty in

Sey

mou

r cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r th

e m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $7

0 m

illion

◆◆

*Pro

ject

720

1: U

S 31

Impr

ovem

ents

– Th

is is

a lo

cal p

roje

ct re

flect

ed

in th

e Sc

ott C

ount

y m

ap o

n pa

ge 3

6.

!

!!

¹º»¼

¬ «7

¬ «135

¬ «235

¬ «11

¬ «11¬ «13

5

¬ «446

¬ «256

¬ «39

¬ «258

¬ «135

¬ «250

¬ «58

£ ¤31

£ ¤50

§̈ ¦65

Brow

nsto

wn

Med

ora

Cro

ther

sville

Seym

our

3605

3610

3609

3601

3606

1009

100910

08

1008

3602

3603

3608

Ü 03.

51.

75M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Jac

kson

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

7201

3604

27

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

901:

US

421

Exte

nsio

n –

Des

ign

and

build

a n

ew

road

from

Eas

t 2nd

Stre

et in

Mad

ison

to S

R 56

. Rea

son:

Re

lieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

ar

cong

estio

n al

ong

US

421

crea

ting

bette

r tra

ffic

flow

for t

he

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$18

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

903:

SR

62/S

R 25

6/SR

56

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ent –

Re-

engi

neer

, rec

onfig

ure

and

rede

sign

SR 6

2/SR

256

/SR

56

inte

rsec

tion.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

ar tr

affic

cr

eatin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Es

timat

ed C

ost:

Incl

uded

in re

gion

al p

roje

ct c

ost f

or

Proj

ect 7

202

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

390

4: U

S 42

1 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

905:

Mic

higa

n/M

ilton

Roa

d Im

prov

emen

ts –

Impr

ove

and

wid

en M

ichi

gan/

Milt

on R

oad

from

US

421

to S

R 62

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

an

d pa

ssen

ger c

ar c

onge

stion

alo

ng M

ichi

gan/

Milt

on R

oad

crea

ting

bette

r tra

ffic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

2 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

906:

SR

62 Im

prov

emen

ts –

Impr

ove

and

wid

en S

R 62

from

Mar

ble

Hill

Road

to S

R 25

6. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

con

gesti

on

alon

g SR

62

crea

ting

bette

r tra

ffic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f ca

rgo.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $5

6 m

illion

◆◆

*Pro

ject

720

2: M

adis

on C

onne

ctor

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pr

ojec

t refl

ecte

d on

the

map

on

page

6.

JEFF

ERSO

N C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

¬ «250

¬ «203

¬ «56

¬ «356

¬ «203

¬ «362

¬ «250 ¬ «35

6

¬ «250

¬ «250

¬ «62

¬ «129

¬ «56¬ «56

¬ «7

¬ «256

¬ «62

¬ «3

£ ¤31

£ ¤421

Mad

ison

Broo

ksbu

rg

Dup

ont

Han

over

3904

7202

3905

3906

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Jef

fers

on C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

3901

29

JENNINGS COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 3605: US 50 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 4001: North Vernon Bypass – Design and build a new road from US 50 to SR 3. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion through North Vernon creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.



Vernon

¬«46

¬«250¬«250

¬«7

¬«7

¬«7

¬«7

¬«3

¬«3

¬«3

4001

3605

£¤31

£¤50

£¤50

§̈¦65

Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Jennings County

Ü0 31.5





State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Non-Interstate

Interstate

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits



31

OH

IO C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

◆◆

Proj

ect 5

801:

SR

56 Im

prov

emen

ts –

Re-e

ngin

eer,

reco

nfigu

re a

nd re

desig

n SR

56

from

Risi

ng S

un to

Aur

ora.

Re

ason

: Saf

ety

on S

R 56

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r th

e m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

4.5

milli

on

¬ «101

¬ «156

¬ «62

¬ «262

¬ «56

£ ¤50

Ris

ing

Sun

5801

Ü 01.

50.

75M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Ohi

o C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

33

RIPLEY COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 2401: SR 229 Improvements – This is a local project reflected in the Franklin County map on page 22.

◆◆ *Project 3904/6903: US 421 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 6901: US 50 Road Improvements – Convert US 50 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from US 421 to South CR 675 East. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along SR 50 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 6902: US 421 Improvements – Convert US 421 by adding acceleration/deceleration lanes to the existing 2 lanes from West CR 200 South to South Industrial Park Boulevard. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 421 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ *Project 7801: Kentuckiana Corridor – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.


Napoleon

Holton

Batesville

Sunman

MilanOsgood

Versailles

¬«262

¬«129

¬«129

¬«229

¬«48

¬«350

¬«350

¬«129

¬«129¬«101

¬«101

¬«62

¬«62

¬«46

¬«46

6902

6901

3904

7801

6903

£¤421

£¤421

£¤421

£¤50

£¤50

§̈¦74

Private Sector Identified Regional NeedsSoutheast Region: Ripley County

Ü0 31.5





State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Non-Interstate

Interstate

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits



7801

2401

7801

35

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

SCO

TT C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

9: In

dian

apol

is to

Lou

isvi

lle R

ail L

ine

Upg

rade

–

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 7

201:

US

31 Im

prov

emen

ts –

Con

vert

US

31 fr

om

2 la

nes

to 4

lane

s fro

m W

est B

ooe

Road

/C

R 45

0 N

orth

to

I-65.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pa

ssen

ger c

ar c

onge

stion

alo

ng U

S 31

cre

atin

g be

tter t

raffi

c flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$25

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

720

2: M

adis

on C

onne

ctor

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pr

ojec

t refl

ecte

d on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 7

203:

Sou

th L

ake

Road

Sou

th/C

R 10

0 W

est

Impr

ovem

ents

– Im

prov

e an

d w

iden

Sou

th La

ke R

oad

from

M

id-A

mer

ica

Scie

nce

Park

to W

est M

cCla

in A

venu

e/SR

56.

Re

ason

: Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er

cong

estio

n on

Sou

th La

ke R

oad

Sout

h/C

R 10

0 W

est c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

.2 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 7

204:

Wes

t Sco

ttsbu

rg T

ruck

Cor

ridor

– Im

prov

e an

d w

iden

Wes

t Moo

nglo

Roa

d fro

m U

S 31

to N

orth

Boa

tman

Ro

ad a

nd N

orth

Boa

tman

to S

R 56

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

onge

stion

th

roug

h Sc

ottsb

urg

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$18

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 7

205:

Indu

stria

l Rai

l Spu

r –

Des

ign

and

build

a ra

il sp

ur fr

om th

e Lo

uisv

ille In

dian

a Ra

ilroa

d tra

cks

north

of S

R 35

6 an

d ea

st of

US

31. R

easo

n: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent

givi

ng fu

rther

rail

acce

ss to

Nor

thw

ind

Cro

ssin

g in

dustr

ies.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

milli

on

¹º»¼

¬ «203

¬ «7¬ «25

0¬ «25

0

¬ «356

¬ «203

¬ «362

¬ «356

¬ «250

¬ «160

¬ «56

¬ «62

¬ «39

¬ «56

¬ «3

¬ «3

¬ «256

¬ «256

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

§̈ ¦65

Scot

tsbu

rg

Aust

in

7201

7204

7202

1008

1008

1009

1009

7205

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Sco

tt C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

0301

7203

37

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

780

1: K

entu

ckia

na C

orrid

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 7

802:

SR

101

Exte

nsio

n –

Des

ign

and

build

a n

ew

road

from

SR

101

to S

R 25

0. R

easo

n: C

reat

e ec

onom

ic

deve

lopm

ent b

y al

low

ing

for a

Nor

th/

Sout

h tru

ck c

orrid

or.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $5

4 m

illion

SWIT

ZER

LAN

D C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

¬ «101

¬ «62

¬ «129

¬ «250

¬ «156

¬ «56

Veva

y

Patri

ot

7802

7801

7801

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Sw

itzer

land

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

39

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

WA

SHIN

GTO

N C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

220

3: U

S 15

0 Ro

ad Im

prov

emen

ts –

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

880

1: S

R 60

4-L

ane

Hig

hway

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pr

ojec

t refl

ecte

d on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 8

802:

Sal

em B

ypas

s Ex

tens

ion

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild

a ne

w ro

ad fr

om S

R 13

5 to

SR

60. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n SR

60/

SR 5

6/SR

135

thro

ugh

Sale

m c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck

traffi

c flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$16.

3 m

illion

¬ «37

¬ «356

¬ «335

¬ «39

¬ «337

¬ «256

¬ «135

¬ «135

¬ «160

¬ «60

¬ «60

¬ «56

£ ¤150

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

§̈ ¦65

Littl

eYo

rk

Cam

pbel

lsbu

rg

New

Peki

n

Har

dins

burg

Livo

nia

Salti

llo

Sale

m

8802

2203

8801

8801

Ü 03.

51.

75M

iles

Dat

e: 9

/1/2

015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

; Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Roa

dway

Enha

ncem

ents

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acilit

y

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

41

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC POLICY GOALS

◆◆ Air Pilot Duty Time (Federal)

◆◆ Reduce through Federal legislation or regulation the Federal Aviation Administration rules for pilot certification and qualification requirements for air carrier operations commonly referred to as the “First Officer Qualification Rule” or “1,500 Hour Rule”

◆◆ Boat Captain Regulations (Federal)

◆◆ Reduce through Federal legislation or regulation the U.S. Coast Guard boat pilot requirements

◆◆ Truck Driver Hours of Service (Federal)

◆◆ Reduce through Federal legislation or regulation the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrations Hours of Service Regulation for commercial motor vehicles

◆◆ Aviation Land Restrictions (Federal)

◆◆ Revise the Federal Aviation Administration rules on off-airport development to balance the needs of air safety while ensuring that locals have the ability to control land use for development of commercial business relating to airport activity

◆◆ Setback & Stoplight Policies (State)

◆◆ Pass legislation to create a setback and traffic light policy on high trafficked Federal Interstate and State highways in Indiana

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS

◆◆ “Did You Know Stories” in the Southeast Region to educate the public on the importance of logistics industry to the Southeast Region and therefore the need for world-class logistics infrastructure

◆◆ Newspaper/Magazine online opinion pieces in the Southeast Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ Editorial boards in the Southeast Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ SERLC Strategic Plan launch press conferences; editorial boards; newspaper/online opinion pieces to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Southeast Region

◆◆ TV/Radio interviews to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Southeast Region

42

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

◆◆ Support the concept of implementing a statewide CDL+ Program

◆◆ Support and expand the Conexus Indiana A+ Partners Program and implement the Conexus Indiana HIRE Tech curriculum into high schools to develop job skills in logistics and operations for the Southeast Region

◆◆ Develop a plan to address the logistics shortages for air cargo pilots; truck drivers; and warehouse/logistics maintenance technicians in the Southeast Region

◆◆ Develop a plan to address the lack of logistics certifications and 2-year degree programs in the Southeast Region

◆◆ Work with other regional organizations to support and market a plan to recruit military veterans with CDLs in the Southeast Region

43

LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSISStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) for Indiana’s Southeast Regional Logistics Sector

INFRASTRUCTURE SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Strong network of airport facilities

◆◆ Two of top 125 cargo airports: Louisville International Airport #3, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport #9

◆◆ One airport with 11,890 feet or more of runway – Louisville International Airport

◆◆ 12 Regional Public Airports: Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport; Clark Regional Airport; Columbus Municipal Airport; Freeman Municipal Airport; Greensburg Municipal Airport; Lee Bottom Airport; Louisville International Airport; Madison Municipal Airport; North Vernon Airport; Robinson Airport; Salem Municipal Airport; Scottsburg Airport

◆◆ Midwest location

◆◆ Existing excess air capacity

◆◆ Strategic geographic coverage of aviation facilities located around the Southeast Region

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Two Class I railroads: CSX and Norfolk Southern Railway

◆◆ Seven Class II and Class III railroads: Central Railroad Company of Indiana; Indiana and Ohio Railway; Indiana Eastern Railroad; Indiana Rail Road; Louisville and Indiana Railroad; Lucas Oil Rail Line; and Madison Railroad

◆◆ Two intermodal facilities – CSX and Norfolk Southern Railway

44

◆◆ Trucking (Roads):

◆◆ Reputation as “Crossroads of America”

◆◆ Five major Interstates and 5 major highways: I-64, I-65, I-74, I-265, I-275, US 31, US 50, US 52, US 150, US 421

◆◆ Strong Midwest location: Borders two states (Ohio & Kentucky)

◆◆ Proximity to Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Louisville, and Nashville markets

◆◆ Proximity to UPS distribution hub at Louisville International Airport

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ One public port on Ohio River – Port of Indiana Jeffersonville

◆◆ 30 private ports on the Ohio River

◆◆ McAlpine Locks and Dam

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Indiana has a trade surplus

◆◆ Leader in exports/imports of important commodities (coal, iron/steel products, grain, food products, scrap metal, etc.)

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Southeast Region airports have minimal international domestic air cargo business

◆◆ Jet fuel prices in Southeast Region

◆◆ Lacking a large distribution hub

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Partially reliant on Louisville intermodal services

◆◆ Lack of large volume intermodal facilities

◆◆ Limited railroad access to Jeffersonville port

◆◆ Primarily pass through region rail intermodal


◆◆ Bottlenecks or traffic congestion – Jeffersonville/New Albany

◆◆ Lack of adequate capacity on Indiana’s Interstate highways

45

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Decaying lock infrastructure on Ohio River

◆◆ Dredging issues for ports and waterways on Ohio River

◆◆ Limited railroad access to Jeffersonville port

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lack of import/export diversification

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Create a strategy to better utilize the Southeast Region’s airports

◆◆ Utilize excess air capacity

◆◆ Utilize runways and facilities at several airports to accommodate air shipping opportunities

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)

◆◆ Build additional/better railroad access to Jeffersonville port


◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to USDOT

◆◆ Relieve bottlenecks around Southeast Region: Jeffersonville/New Albany

◆◆ Upgrade Southeast Region strategic bridges that are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete

◆◆ Build dedicated truck lanes that separate trucks from passenger cars on I-65

◆◆ Encourage the design of truck lanes on I-65 that can accommodate future technological innovations and uses

◆◆ Allow increase in truck weight limits along Kentucky and Ohio borders

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Re-engineer and repair the decaying lock infrastructure on the Ohio River

◆◆ Dredge the areas around ports and waterways on the Ohio River

◆◆ Build additional/better railroad access to Indiana ports

46

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to USDOT

◆◆ The value of U.S. imports and exports is expected to be equivalent to 60 percent of GDP by 2030

◆◆ Work for diversification of exports/imports

THREATS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Continued underutilization of Southeast Region airports

◆◆ Dependence on increasing bottlenecks leading to inefficient air cargo service

◆◆ Lack of state funding to meet infrastructure needs

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Continuation of the Southeast Region as a pass through area for rail

◆◆ Reliance on surrounding cities for intermodal services

◆◆ Surrounding states pushing for rail investment

◆◆ Lack of Class 1 rail access to major industrial sites


◆◆ Lack of funding to build roads to relieve bottle necks or traffic congestion

◆◆ Lack of funding to upgrade Southeast Region strategic bridges that are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Failure of decaying lock infrastructure, leading to stoppage of all barge traffic on Ohio River

◆◆ Inability to provide necessary access by not dredging the Ohio River

◆◆ Loss of business due to inadequate railroad access to ports

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lack of diversification of exports/imports

◆◆ Lack of funding for all infrastructure modes

◆◆ Impact of Federal Government energy policy on all modes of transportation

47

PUBLIC POLICY SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Federal Government reimburses up to 90 percent of costs for qualified airport projects

◆◆ Local funding of all Southeast Region airports

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Ports of Indiana bonding authority for rail facilities

◆◆ Local rail investment

◆◆ Industrial Rail Service Fund


◆◆ P3 funding for Indiana highways and roads

◆◆ State of Indiana focus on road construction

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Ports of Indiana (public and private): Jeffersonville

◆◆ Ports of Indiana bonding authority for port activity

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Indiana’s use of public/private partnerships to facilitate the funding of key projects in the Southeast Region

◆◆ Transportation and Logistics Tax Credit

◆◆ Tax abatement for vacant buildings

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Lack of true Indiana regional airport for freight

◆◆ Lack of “ownership” by public entities on air freight movement

◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding for the Southeast Region

◆◆ Pilot shortages

◆◆ Airline pilot duty and entry level requirements for flight time

48

◆◆ Rail:◆◆ Continued need for private rail investment compared to surrounding states◆◆ Lack of “ownership” by public entities on rail freight movement◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding◆◆ Railroad employee hours of service requirements


◆◆ Federal/State use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs

◆◆ Lower truck weight limits compared to Kentucky

◆◆ Inefficiencies in collection of fuel taxes

◆◆ Changes to Hours of Service regulations

◆◆ Truck driver shortages

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Use of Harbor Maintenance Tax for other general Federal revenue needs

◆◆ Lack of “ownership” by public entities of waterborne shipping

◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding

◆◆ Lack of public and legislator understanding of importance of locks infrastructure

◆◆ Boat pilot time requirements

◆◆ Barge captain shortages

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Increase in unemployment insurance (UI) tax on State level

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Dedicated air fund creating more Federal funding

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Federal and State investment tax credit incentivizing private rail investment

◆◆ Funding for inter/multimodal rail development

49


◆◆ Federal and State firewall on gas taxes for highway use only

◆◆ Dedicated truck lanes on I-65

◆◆ Allow increase of truck weight limits at Kentucky and Ohio borders

◆◆ Use of state sales tax on gasoline

◆◆ New innovative funding mechanisms for roads

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Adequate funding for locks projects

◆◆ Federal firewall on Harbor Maintenance Tax for waterways use only

◆◆ Harbor Assistance Program to incentivize ports and private investments

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lower UI tax on State level

◆◆ Lower capital gains tax on Federal level◆◆ Reduction of personal property tax

THREATS:◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Surrounding state of Tennessee offers grants/loans/tax credits for air economic development/private investment

◆◆ Loss of matching dollars from Federal Government because of lack of State investment

◆◆ Federal cap and trade legislation/regulation

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee offer grants/loans/tax credits for rail economic development/private investment

◆◆ Federal cap and trade legislation/regulation

◆◆ Trucking (Roads):◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois, Ohio, and Tennessee offer grants/loans/tax credits for

trucking economic development/private investment◆◆ Lack of Federal/State highway dollars for new/existing roads◆◆ Continued use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs◆◆ Competitiveness issues due to higher truck weight limits in Illinois and Kentucky◆◆ Continued inefficient collection of fuel taxes◆◆ Federal cap and trade legislation/regulation

50

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Surrounding states of Ohio and Tennessee offer grants/loans/tax credits for waterborne economic development/private investment

◆◆ Continued use of waterways taxes for other general Federal revenue needs

◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding for locks infrastructure repair

◆◆ Warehousing/Distribution:

◆◆ Surrounding states of Ohio and Kentucky offer grants/loans/tax credits for warehousing/real estate economic development/private investment

◆◆ Further State tax increases for UI

◆◆ Lack of speculative buildings for warehousing/distribution in Southeast Region

◆◆ Current use of vacant warehouse/distribution facilities

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lack of policy action leading to loss of private investment

◆◆ Lack of a State funds for unexpected economic development infrastructure needs

◆◆ Continued lack of growth in national economy

51

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT

STRENGTHS:◆◆ Public/private postsecondary institutions with ability to reach mass of workers

◆◆ Entrepreneurs creating online curriculum programs

◆◆ State Government officials who understand importance of up-skilling Hoosier workers

◆◆ Growth of logistics firms in the Southeast Region

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Lack of skilled workers

◆◆ Public misconception of warehouse jobs

◆◆ Assorted logistics education curriculum not meeting industry needs

◆◆ Air cargo pilot, truck driver, and boat captain shortages

◆◆ Warehouse/Logistics maintenance technician shortages

◆◆ 4-year logistics degree supervisor shortages

◆◆ Lack of fork lift certifications

OPPORTUNITIES:◆◆ Identify logistics job skills gap areas

◆◆ Curriculum development with postsecondary education to meet job skills gap areas

◆◆ Create online program to up-skill Indiana logistics workers from places of employment

◆◆ Continued growth of logistics jobs in the Southeast Region

◆◆ Connect to surrounding states’ job training programs

THREATS:

◆◆ Loss of logistics economic development due to workforce gaps

◆◆ Continued perception of logistics industry as undesirable work

◆◆ Lower skill workers remaining in lower level positions

◆◆ Lack of 4-year degree student interested in logistics careers

◆◆ Lack of air cargo pilots, truck drivers, and boat captains

◆◆ Lack of warehouse logistics maintenance technicians

◆◆ Lack of 4-year logistics supervisors

52

PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Positive visibility of trucking

◆◆ Viewed as a center for surrounding major cities

◆◆ Easy access to all four modes of transportation

◆◆ Unified regional support for bi-state cooperation

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Lack of public understanding of logistics

◆◆ Lack of public understanding of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Public misperception of logistics jobs

◆◆ Public misperception of global trade & positive impact on the Southeast Region

◆◆ Lack of awareness of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of logistics industry

◆◆ Explain the facts on how the logistics industry impacts everyday life

◆◆ Educate public on need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Educate public on high-skill, high-wage jobs in logistics

◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of global trade

◆◆ Increase understanding of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes

THREATS:

◆◆ Continued public misperception of the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ Lack of awareness of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Continued public misperception of logistics jobs

◆◆ Continued public misperception of road and rail congestion to quality of life

◆◆ Lack of awareness of positive impacts of global trade

53

SOUTHEAST REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

◆◆ Air

◆◆ 12 Southeast Public Airports

◆◆ Two of Top 125 Cargo Airports Nationally: Louisville International Airport #3 and Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport #9

◆◆ #1 UPS Hub at Louisville International Airport

◆◆ One Airport with 11,890 Feet or More of Runway – Louisville International Airport

◆◆ Rail

◆◆ Two Class I Railroads

◆◆ Seven Class II and III Railroads

◆◆ Two Intermodal Facilities

◆◆ Trucking:

◆◆ Five Major Interstates and 5 Major Highways: I-65, I-64, I-74, I-265, I-275, US 31, US 50, Us 52, US 150, US 421

◆◆ Reputation as “Crossroads of America”

◆◆ Proximity to UPS Distribution Hub at Louisville International Airport

◆◆ Waterborne

◆◆ One Public Port on the Ohio River

◆◆ 30 Private Ports on the Ohio River

FOR MORE INFORMATION

CONTACT:

DAVID W. HOLT Vice President Operations & Business Development

Conexus Indiana111 Monument Circle

Suite 1800Indianapolis, IN 46204

Phone: (317)638-2108email: [email protected]

www.conexusindiana.com

Brought to you in part by

111 Monument Circle, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-638-2108

www.conexusindiana.com

SOUTHEAST REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL REGIONAL LINKS: …az480170.vo.msecnd.net/6864e884-8313-4d1f-97b8-696c824cfd60/d… · Cummins, Inc. Columbus Mark St. Clair Mgr., Ohio Valley

Documents