Top Banner
Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007
17

Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Some thoughts on artefacts

Sally Fincherhci Disciplinary Commons

Third Meeting: 7th December 2007

Page 2: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

The story so far …

Page 3: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

We’ve explored “institutional” context

• Me, my background, my colleagues

• The sort of University/Department I teach in

• The sort of students I teach

• The expectations of my environment (“standards”)

• The sort (and size) of my class

• The sort of space and place I work in

Page 4: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

We’ve started to explore “disciplinary” context

• What stuff do I teach? (Why?)

• Which textbook do I use? (Why?)

• Who gets to choose?

• What can I change?

• Why would I change it?

• What influences my decisions here?

Page 5: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

We’re documenting our reflections/discoveries

• Portfolio construction

• The problem of artefacts What do they illustrate? What function do they serve?

Page 6: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Research artefacts: Angwandte ChemieResearch artefacts

Page 7: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Angwandte Chemie

• [a typical paper] … is about three pages long. Almost one page contains experimental detail. Half a page is endnotes. The body of the article is then about one and a half printed pages, of which roughly a third consists of graphics

Page 8: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Angwandte Chemie: research results

“The authors speak, as chemists today do, of molecules that they do not see, but for which they have excellent indirect evidence … I have written of this incredible process, and the way that the chemists’ necessity to move simultaneously in macroscopic and microscopic worlds forces chemists to use a mixture of symbolic and iconic representation of compounds/molecules”

Hoffman (2002)

Page 9: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Angwandte Chemie: research artefact

A particular feature of Angwandte Chemie is the mandatory inclusion at the end of any experimental paper is an “Experimental Section”, detailing procedures for the experiments carried out

Page 10: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

“Experimental Section” as artefact

“This is a general statement that, in effect, states that anyone, anytime, anywhere who treats the same ingredients in the same way as I did, will make the same chemical compound”

- and yet, it is based on a single empirical study at one specific time and in one specific place

Page 11: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

But we’re not researchers … we’re commoners …

• We do not have the guarantee of scientific method

• Equally, we’re not interested in abstraction

• Nor are we interested in generalisation

• We are pursuing a different sort of knowledge, with a different sort of representation (a portfolio, not a paper)

• Our focuswith the greatest clarity we can musteris on the specific, the particular

Page 12: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

The power of situation

• In a society that attaches particular value to "abstract knowledge," the details of practice have come to be seen as nonessential, unimportant, and easily developed once the relevant abstractions have been grasped.

• Abstractions detached from practice distort or obscure intricacies of that practice. Without a clear understanding of those intricacies and the role they play, the practice itself cannot be well understood, engendered (through training), or enhanced (through innovation).

(Seely-Brown & Duguid, 1991)

Page 13: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Situation: a familiar power

“To cook rice correctly requires not only patience and skill but an abstract conception of an idealized form.

So what I turned to for help was the basic artisanal sense of task. Make it simple by making it particular: what can I do with this rice, this rice pot, this need, this temperament?”

“The problem, I gradually realized, was that I wanted to simply follow a set of instructions, whereas what was required of me was to establish a close working relationship with a particular cooking vessel—my personal rice pot.”

(Thorne & Thorne, 2000)

Page 14: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Losing the particular

“I've never been much for technology, so when I bought a car recently that came with GPS, I imagined that the device would go largely unused. But a few months later, on my way to visit friends at their new home in Oakland, California, I decided to give it a try. A patient yet firm woman's voice guided me easily to the exact location, and much to my surprise, I fell in love with the feature.

Then one night, as I drove to see my friends for the fourth or fifth time, I realized that I had no idea how to get there. I'd been blindly following instructions from a disembodied voice without paying attention to where I was going.”

(Patterson, 2006)

Page 15: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

Our artefacts

• Don’t think recipes: think ricepots

Page 16: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

References

• Roald Hoffman (2002) Writing (and Drawing) Chemistry in Jonathan Monroe (ed) Writing and Revising the Disciplines, Cornell University

• John Seely Brown, Paul Duguid Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation 1991, The Institute of Management Sciences http://www2.parc.com/ops/members/brown/papers/orglearning.html

• John Thorne, Matt Lewis Thorne, Serious Pig: An American Cook in Search of His Roots, 2000, North Point Press

• Daniel Patterson Do Recipes Make You a Better Cook? Food & Wine Magazine June 2006

Page 17: Some thoughts on artefacts Sally Fincher hci Disciplinary Commons Third Meeting: 7th December 2007.

This work is licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales Creative Commons License