SOLUTION TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLES OF CONTAMINATED · PDF fileSOLUTION TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLES OF CONTAMINATED SITES AND SOIL GEOSTATISTICS : « ON SITE » ANALYSIS - ENVISOL -...

Gaël PLASSART October 2013 - Banff

Advanced technology in characterisation and rehabilitation

SOLUTION TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLES OF CONTAMINATED SITES AND SOIL GEOSTATISTICS :

« ON SITE » ANALYSIS

- ENVISOL

- Principles of geostatistics - Environmental assessments - Cost / benefit study and conclusion

Introduction

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Engineering office founded in France in 2009

Mutlidisciplinary team – 20 consultants (engineers, doctors, university

graduates)

3 locations (Paris, Lyon and Montréal)

Envisol is specialized in characterizing and rehabilitation of contaminated sites

Our values: Passion – Expertise – Reactivity – Innovation

R & D centre

2013 forecast turnover : 2 millions CAD

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

They trust us Petrochemical and

chemical industry

Real estate developer

Mines

Nuclear industry

Rehabilitation

company

Transportation

company

Municipalities

Government agency

Army

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Geostatistic : A tool commonly used and had been for decades in the oil and mining industry

Geostatistic to optimize the remediation of contamined sites

Associate global site analysis for scientific approach : Refine volumes of contaminated soils depending on the spatial variability of soil contamination Modelling, mapping 3D volumes of contaminated soil Decontamination plan Asses accuratly the financial risk of the project

Geostatistic greatly reduces the financial risk for remediation projects key in hand

The larger the project is important (many drilling and analysis) the more geostatistic is effective

1. Site data integration

2. Exploratory data analysis

3. Experimental variograms modelling

4. Interpolation methods : Krigging

5. Modelling, 3D mapping, estimated volume of contaminated land

Methodology

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Detailed environmental assessment : step long, expensive and rough ! - Analytical laboratories expensive, time high - Intervention (drills) - Blindly sampling - Result:

Decrease the number of analyzes and sampling point Contaminated volumes : absence of estimation uncertainty

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

How to improve the characterization of contaminated sites ?

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Detailed environmental assessment : step long, expensive and rough ! - Analytical laboratories expensive, time high - Intervention (drills) - Blindly sampling - Result:

Decrease the number of analyzes and sampling point Contaminated volumes : absence of estimation uncertainty

On site analysis Geostatitic

Optimisation of the field work Better estimation of the volume of the contaminated soil

- Cheap - Fast - Easy to use

- Interpolate accuratly the results

- Estimate uncertainty

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

How to improve the characterization of contaminated sites ?

Detailed environmental assessment : step long, expensive and rough ! - Analytical laboratories expensive, time high - Intervention (drills) - Blindly sampling - Result:

Decrease the number of analyzes and sampling point Contaminated volumes : absence of estimation uncertainty

Studies

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Geology, hydrogeology -Alluvial deposits : sand, silt and gravel -Groundwater is 6 m deep

Manufacturing site of railway tie Site : -Old site, 1900 -The study was carried out on part of the site, 16 000 m2 -Preventive treatment of wood, -Railway tie, electric poles,

Chimicals : -Creosote -Mixture of creosote and oil -Compounds: PAHs and et BTEX (up to 90%); -Denser than water

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Risk areas Sump

Setting pond

Storage of chemicals

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Choice - Risk area - Delimitation of pollution - Drilling number - No empty area

- 39 boreholes - 70 laboratory analysis - 68 colorimetric tests - 308 PID mesures

Sampling strategy studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Critères: -Contaminants -concentration range -data quality -practicality -Price

Colorimetric test - THC / PAHs - Extraction - visual

PID portable

- VOC - Direct measurement

Choice of on site analyzis studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

PID Colorimetric test

Sampling

PID Colo test

• 2 boreholes analysis • 68 samples • 14 % in common with lab

• Measures each 0.50 m • 308 measures • 26 % in common with lab

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Colorimetric test

On site analysis - geostatistic studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Colorimetric test

On site analysis - geostatistic

Classe Observations Gamme de concentration moyenne de concentration16 HAP (mg/kg) 16 HAP (mg/kg)

1 blanc 0-4,8 2,52 gris clair 40-140 903 vert 1300-2500 19004 vert foncé 4400-7700 6000

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Colorimetric test

On site analysis - geostatistic

Classe Observations Gamme de concentration moyenne de concentration16 HAP (mg/kg) 16 HAP (mg/kg)

1 blanc 0-4,8 2,52 gris clair 40-140 903 vert 1300-2500 19004 vert foncé 4400-7700 6000

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Mesures PID

Nombre Moyenne Ecartype Minimum Maximum Médiane Coefficient de variation

Mesures PID (ppmv) 0 14,1 30,9 0,3 189,9 3,2 2,2Mesures 16 HAP laboratoire (mg/kg) 79 542,6 1398,4 0 7700 12 2,6

On site analysis - geostatistic studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Results studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Results

Sump Settings pond

Storage of chemicals

section A-A’

A

A’

A A’

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

P 5 ( 12524.00)P10 ( 11928.00)

P15 ( 11588.00)

P50 ( 10492.00)

P85 ( 9538.00)P90 ( 9264.00)

P95 ( 8942.00)

8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16

Volume (m3)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Frequencies

Results

Thyssen Polygons

Volume = 20 305 m3

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Conventional method versus innovative approach

Volume of polluted soil

Real : 11 000 m3

Geostatistic : 10 500 m3 ; 4.5 %

Conventional : 20 000 m3 ; 80 %

Cost/benefit study

Time spent in the field : + 40 %

Time spent at the office : + 15 %

Total analysis cost : + 10 %

studies conclusions Geostatistics Envisol

Conventional method versus innovative approach

Thank you for your attention