Soluble starch synthase I: a major determinant for the synthesis of amylopectin in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves David Delvalle ´ 1 , Sylvain Dumez 1 , Fabrice Wattebled 1 , Isaac Rolda ´n 2 , Ve ´ ronique Planchot 3 , Pierre Berbezy 4 , Paul Colonna 3 , Darshna Vyas 4 , Manash Chatterjee 4,† , Steven Ball 1 ,A ´ ngel Me ´ rida 2 and Christophe D’Hulst 1,* 1 Unite ´ de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, UMR8576 CNRS/USTL, IFR 118, Universite ´ des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France, 2 Instituto de Bioquimica Vegetal y Fotosintesis, CSIC-USE Avda Americo Vespucio s/n, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Seville, Spain, 3 Unite ´ de Recherche sur les Polysaccharides leurs Interactions et leurs Organisations, Centre INRA de Nantes, rue de la Ge ´ raudie ` re, B.P. 71627, 44316 Nantes Cedex 3, France, and 4 Biogemma UK Ltd, 200 Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0GZ, UK Received 29 March 2005; accepted 6 May 2005. * For correspondence (fax þ33 3 20 43 65 55; e-mail [email protected]). † Present address: National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK. Summary A minimum of four soluble starch synthase families have been documented in all starch-storing green plants. These activities are involved in amylopectin synthesis and are extremely well conserved throughout the plant kingdom. Mutants or transgenic plants defective for SSII and SSIII isoforms have been previously shown to have a large and specific impact on the synthesis of amylopectin while the function of the SSI type of enzymes has remained elusive. We report here that Arabidopsis mutants, lacking a plastidial starch synthase isoform belonging to the SSI family, display a major and novel type of structural alteration within their amylopectin. Comparative analysis of b-limit dextrins for both wild type and mutant amylopectins suggests a specific and crucial function of SSI during the synthesis of transient starch in Arabidopsis leaves. Considering our own characterization of SSI activity and the previously described kinetic properties of maize SSI, our results suggest that the function of SSI is mainly involved in the synthesis of small outer chains during amylopectin cluster synthesis. Keywords: Arabidopsis, starch, amylopectin structure, starch synthase, a-glucan. Introduction Starch accumulates in plants as a highly ordered mixture of amylopectin and amylose. Both macromolecules are solely made of glucose residues that are linked together by a-1,4 (linear chains) and a-1,6 (branch points) O-glycosidic bonds (Bule ´on et al., 1998). Structural organization and physico- chemical properties of amylopectin and amylose are clearly distinct. The branching level is mostly responsible for these differences. Amylopectin is the major component of starch (up to 80% of starch weight) and is a highly branched molecule (5–6% of a-1,6 linkages) that adopts a cluster-like organization (Hizukuri, 1986; Manners, 1989). Conversely, amylose is an infrequently branched molecule (<1%) whose organization within the granule remains obscure. Metabolism of starch is under the control of a large panel of enzymatic activities commonly found in several distinct isoforms (Ball and Morell, 2003; Myers et al., 2000). This multiplicity of enzyme forms makes it difficult to understand the specific role of each component in the pathway. The presence of multiple starch synthases is an ancient trait correlating with the presence of starch metabolism within the plastid of all green plants. This was recently demonstra- ted by the finding of six sequences coding the same classes of enzymes in the genomes of those green algae that are thought to have diverged at the earliest stage from the common ancestor of the green lineage (Ral et al., 2004). Starch synthases (EC 2.4.1.21) elongate glucans by addition of a glucose residue from ADP-glucose to their non-reducing ends (NREs) through the formation of a-1,4 linkages. One form of starch synthase, granule bound starch synthase I (GBSSI) is specifically associated with the starch granule 398 ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Plant Journal (2005) 43, 398–412 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02462.x
15
Embed
Soluble starch synthase I: a major determinant for the synthesis of amylopectin in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Soluble starch synthase I: a major determinant for thesynthesis of amylopectin in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves
David Delvalle1, Sylvain Dumez1, Fabrice Wattebled1, Isaac Roldan2, Veronique Planchot3, Pierre Berbezy4, Paul Colonna3,
Darshna Vyas4, Manash Chatterjee4,†, Steven Ball1, Angel Merida2 and Christophe D’Hulst1,*
1Unite de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, UMR8576 CNRS/USTL, IFR 118, Universite des Sciences et Technologies
de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France,2Instituto de Bioquimica Vegetal y Fotosintesis, CSIC-USE Avda Americo Vespucio s/n, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Seville, Spain,3Unite de Recherche sur les Polysaccharides leurs Interactions et leurs Organisations, Centre INRA de Nantes, rue de la
Geraudiere, B.P. 71627, 44316 Nantes Cedex 3, France, and4Biogemma UK Ltd, 200 Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0GZ, UK
Received 29 March 2005; accepted 6 May 2005.*For correspondence (fax þ33 3 20 43 65 55; e-mail [email protected]).†Present address: National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK.
Summary
A minimum of four soluble starch synthase families have been documented in all starch-storing green plants.
These activities are involved in amylopectin synthesis and are extremely well conserved throughout the plant
kingdom. Mutants or transgenic plants defective for SSII and SSIII isoforms have been previously shown to
have a large and specific impact on the synthesis of amylopectin while the function of the SSI type of enzymes
has remained elusive. We report here that Arabidopsis mutants, lacking a plastidial starch synthase isoform
belonging to the SSI family, display a major and novel type of structural alteration within their amylopectin.
Comparative analysis of b-limit dextrins for both wild type and mutant amylopectins suggests a specific and
crucial function of SSI during the synthesis of transient starch in Arabidopsis leaves. Considering our own
characterization of SSI activity and the previously described kinetic properties of maize SSI, our results
suggest that the function of SSI is mainly involved in the synthesis of small outer chains during amylopectin
phosphoglucomutase and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase
(Figure 3; Table 1). Moreover, no modification of GBSSI
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 2. (a, b) Zymogram of soluble starch
synthases (SSs) from leaf extract performed
under native conditions. After migration of
150 lg of proteins on a glycogen-containing gel
and incubation overnight at room temperature
with 1 mM ADP-glucose, SS activities were
revealed by soaking the gel for 30 min in lugol
solution (I2/KI) and washed several times with
distilled water before the picture was taken.
Lanes WS and Col-0: wild-type references cor-
responding to ecotypes Wassilewskija and
Columbia respectively. Lanes Atss1-1 and
Atss1-2: SSI mutant samples.
(c) Western blot analysis of different SS mutants
of Arabidopsis thaliana. Soluble proteins
(100 lg) from a leaf crude extract were loaded
and separated onto an SDS-PAGE gel (7.5%
acrylamide). After transfer onto the PVDF mem-
brane, the blot was probed overnight at 4�C with
antiserum PA55 (dilution 1:200 in TBS). WS and
Col-0, wild-type samples (Wassilewskija and
Columbia ecotypes respectively). Atss1-1 and
Atss1-2, SSI mutant samples. AtSS3 and AtSS4
lanes correspond to leaf extracts of mutant lines
defective in genes At1g11720 and At4g18240
respectively (corresponding to SSIII and SSIV
type of soluble SSs).
Table 1 In vitro assays of several starch-metabolizing enzymes performed with leafcrude extracts of wild type and Atss1-1lines. Activities are expressed in nmolmin)1 mg)1 of proteins � standard error(in each case n ¼ 3) except for a-amylasefor which the activity level is expressed inarbitrary units (‘Ceralpha units’ as des-cribed by the manufacturer)
more details). SSI activity regularly increases with the size of
the acceptor malto-oligosaccharide, although maltose does
not represent an effective substrate for the recombinant
enzyme. However, branched glucans represent much better
substrates for the enzyme as witnessed by the higher level of
activity measured with BLD when compared with DP2 and
DP3 and glycogen when compared with DP7. The average
outer chain length (OCL) of branched glucans clearly influ-
ences the activity of SSI. While SSI is strongly active on
glycogen (OCL ¼ 7–8), it is less active on maize amylopectin
(OCL ¼ 12–14) and much less active on maize BLD
(OCL ¼ 2.5). The same behaviour has been described for
maize SSI (Commuri and Keeling, 2001) indicating that both
enzymes are closely related and might have the same
function in both plants. The activity of SSI was also tested
on the Arabidopsis amylopectin purified from both the wild
type and the Atss1-1 mutant lines. SSI is almost four times
more active on wild-type amylopectin suggesting that the
structure of mutant amylopectin is modified and not com-
patible with the optimal activity of SSI. These modifications
are likely to concern the most outer chains within amylo-
pectin that are expected to define the best available
substrates for SSI.
Phenotypic characterization of the mutant line
Germination percentages, rates of growth, flowering capa-
cities and formation of siliques were recorded for Atss1-1
and Atss1-2 mutant lines. All these parameters were com-
parable with those of the wild-type reference strain. Starch
levels and structure were also compared with those of the
wild-type reference. Interruption of the AtSS1 locus led to a
near-23% decrease in leaf starch level measured at the end of
the illuminated period (Table 3). However, both the wild
type and the mutant plants were essentially devoid of starch
at the end of the dark period. No accumulation of water-
soluble a-glucans was recorded in this line. The kmax of the
iodine–polysaccharide complex measured for the total
starch (after lipid removal) was slightly increased in the
mutant (from 562 nm in wild type to 567 nm in Atss1-1)
suggesting the presence of a higher level of amylose
(Table 3). Size exclusion chromatography performed on
sepharose CL-2B columns (Figure 4) and subsequent amy-
loglucosidase assay of the fractionated glucans demon-
strated that the amylose content increased from 19% of the
total starch in the wild-type line to 31% in the mutant
Table 2 Determination of the glucan primer preference of therecombinant SSI expressed in Escherichia coli. Results are themean of three independent assays (� SE) and are expressed innmol min)1 mg)1 of proteins
OCL, average outer chain length; Ø, not applicable.aThe final concentration of the glucan was 10 mg ml)1 except foramylopectin purified from the wild type and the mutant (Atss1-1)Arabidopsis lines: 1 mg ml)1.bThe activity measured for SSI has been expressed to the estimatednumber of non-reducing ends (NREs) available to the enzyme duringthe reaction for each substrate (nmol min)1 mg)1 10)18 NREs). Formalto-oligosaccharides (DP2–DP7) the number of NREs that isactually equivalent to the concentration of the molecule within thereaction buffer has been precisely calculated. However, this value hasonly been estimated for amylopectin, b-limit dextrins (BLD) andglycogen. The number of NREs for amylopectin and BLD wasestimated taking into consideration the following parameters: 105
glucose residues per amylopectin molecule with an average branch-ing level of 6%. Amylopectin b-amylolysis limit ¼ 55% (i.e. 45% ofremaining material after the digestion of amylopectin by b-amylase).For glycogen: 5.5 · 104 glucose residues per molecule with anaverage branching level of 9%.cAmylopectin was purified by size exclusion chromatography onsepharose CL-2B column.
Table 3 Leaf starch accumulation in wild type (ecotype WS) and Atss1-1 lines. The results presented in this table are the average of fiveindependent experiments (mean � SE). Starch was extracted at the end of the illuminated period. Amounts of starch, amylose and WSP weredetermined by amyloglucosidase assays (see Experimental procedures). The kmax of amylopectin and the amount of amylose were measuredafter purification through size exclusion chromatography on sepharose CL-2B columns
Wild type (WS) Atss1-1 P-valuea
Starch content (mg g)1 of FW) (n ¼ 5) 2.18 � 0.2 1.68 � 0.19 0.0384kmax of total starch (n ¼ 8) 562 � 2 nm 567 � 2 nm 0.0801kmax of amylopectin (n ¼ 8) 558 � 1 nm 564 � 3 nm 0.0773Proportion of amylose (n ¼ 6) 18.6 � 2.5% 30.6 � 2.4% 0.0036Total WSP content (mg g)1 of FW) Not detected Not detected Ø
kmax, wavelength at the maximal absorbance of the iodine–polysaccharide complex; FW, fresh weight; WSP, water-soluble polysaccharides.aCalculation based on Student’s two-sample t-test; Ø, not applicable.
SSI mutant of Arabidopsis 403
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
Figure 5. Comparison of the chain length (CL) distribution profiles for wild type and mutant amylopectins. (a) WS. (b) Atss1-1. (d) Col-0. (e) Atss1-2. After
purification on CL-2B column, amylopectin was debranched with isoamylase and pullulanase. The resulting glucans were analysed by HPAEC-PAD. The relative
proportions for each glucan in the total population are expressed as a percentage of the total number of chains (thin vertical bars correspond to standard deviation
calculated for each DP; the presented results are the average of two independent experiments). (c, f) Difference plots between the wild type and the mutant lines
(c ¼ b ) a; f ¼ e ) d).
SSI mutant of Arabidopsis 405
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
several tissues (leaves, flowers and stems). Our results indi-
cate that SSI is expressed at similar levels throughout the
plant (Supplementary Material). This result closely correlates
with that of MPSS data generated for Arabidopsis (available
at http://mpss.udel.edu/at/java.html). Moreover, the expres-
sion pattern of SSI in the leaves was established by semi-
quantitative RT-PCR through a 12 h day/12 h night cycle
(Supplementary Material). It was found that the level of
mRNA is at maximum levels at the end of the illuminated
period and progressively decreases during the night down to
a minimum level 3 h before lights are turned on (three inde-
pendent experiments). These results closely match those
described for transcriptomics experiments in short- and
long-day periods (available at http://www.starchmetnet.org/
Datapages/AtSS1/AtSS1Frameset.htm). This suggests that
the increase in SSI mRNA level anticipates the onset of light.
Nevertheless, the observed oscillation at the mRNA level
correlated neither with fluctuations in protein content
(Western blot) nor with those of enzyme activity levels
seems to be regulated by some additional unidentified post-
transcriptional mechanisms in Arabidopsis leaves.
Discussion
This work reports the phenotypic analysis of two inde-
pendent mutant lines of A. thaliana having a T-DNA insertion
in the AtSS1 (At5g24300) gene encoding a type I form of
starch synthase. These insertion mutations lead to the syn-
thesis of abnormal transcripts together with the absence of a
protein of 67 kDa that matches the predicted mature size for
SSI, which is able to interact with an antibody raised against
one of the highly conserved regions of starch synthases. We
have also shown that in both T-DNA insertion lines, one
soluble starch synthase activity is missing although other
starch-metabolizing enzymes remain unaffected by the
mutation. Therefore, the phenotypic effects observed on
starch metabolism in both lines arise from the deficiency in
SSI activity encoded by the AtSS1 locus and cannot be easily
explained by the presence of unidentified secondary muta-
tions. Moreover, biochemical characterization of recombin-
ant SSI expressed in E. coli has shown that this enzyme is
closely related to maize SSI (Commuri and Keeling, 2001).
Although extensive biochemical work has been carried
out on SSI from different plant sources, its function during
1
345678
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40012345678
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
0
1
2
3
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
012345678
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40012345678
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
0123456
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
–2
–1
–2
–1
–2–3
–1
0
1
2
3
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
2
0
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(g)
(f)
(e)
Degree of polymerization
Rel
ativ
e pr
opor
tion
of e
ach
DP
in %
Figure 6. Comparison of the chain length (CL) distribution profiles for wild type and mutant amylopectins after b-amylolysis. (a) WS wild-type amylopectin.
(b) Atss1-1 amylopectin. (c) Wild-type amylopectin after b-amylolysis. (d) Atss1-1 amylopectin after b-amylolysis. After purification on CL-2B column, amylopectin
was subjected to b-amylolysis prior to debranching with isoamylase and pullulanase. The resulting glucans were analysed by HPAEC-PAD. The relative proportion
for each glucan is expressed as a percentage of the total number of chains (thin vertical bars correspond to standard variation calculated for each DP; the presented
results are the average of two independent experiments). (e, f) Difference plots between the CL distribution profiles before and after b-amylolysis for the wild type
and mutant amylopectin respectively (e ¼ c ) a; f ¼ d ) b). (g) Difference plot between CL distribution profiles of wild type and mutant amylopectins after
b-amylolysis (g ¼ d ) c).
406 David Delvalle et al.
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
in vitro (Commuri and Keeling, 2001). This result suggests
that SSI activity displays very little (or even no) overlap with
the activities of other enzymes of the starch-synthesizing
machinery, especially other soluble or granule starch
synthases.
From the perspective of activity, SSI can be viewed as a
major filling enzyme with little capacity to extend chains and
generate suitable substrates for the branching enzymes. A
possible explanation for the fact that an increased number of
longer outer chains is witnessed in the mutant is that the
slow release of SSI by its substrate would therefore tend to
inhibit its replacement by another elongation enzyme and
subsequently tend to terminate the synthesis of a cluster.
Competition, for both primer and substrate, between SSI
and enzymes capable of generating very long chains to
initiate a novel cluster (such as SSIII) might constitute an
effective way to regulate the growth and size of the
amylopectin molecule. The absence of SSI would thus
redirect the activity of one (or several) of the remaining
starch synthases (including GBSSI) towards the synthesis of
longer outer chains in the mutant amylopectin. Generation
of double mutant lines defective in SSI and other starch
synthases would help in defining which isoform is respon-
sible for the observed phenotype in the Atss1-1 line.
Various balances of activity between these isoforms in
different tissues would thus lead to different structures that
would be more or less accessible to degradation. One can
speculate that having more external clusters in transitory
starches of leaves will provide best-suited substrates for a
rapid degradation by exoenzymes such as b-amylases that
are known to be effective in plant leaves (Scheidig et al.,
2002). SSI is indeed thought to have less impact on storage
starch synthesis. Indeed, a preliminary report of a rice
mutant defective in SSI activity in the endosperm (unpub-
lished data reported in a review by Nakamura, 2002) showed
a lesser impact on storage starch structure.
Experimental procedures
Materials
ADP [U-14C] glucose, CL-2B sepharose column and Percoll wereobtained from Amersham Biosciences (Orsay, France). ADP-glucose was from Sigma (Lyon, France). Starch assay kit waspurchased from Enzytec (Toulouse, France).
Arabidopsis lines, growth conditions and media
Wild type (Wassilewskija, WS and Columbia, Col-0) and mutantlines of A. thaliana were obtained from the T-DNA mutant collec-tions generated at URGV, INRA, Versailles (Bechtold et al., 1993;Bouchez et al., 1993) and Syngenta (Sessions et al., 2002). Standardprocedures were employed for plant germination and growth. Theplants were grown on peat-based compost (seeds were previouslyincubated at 4�C before sowing) under 8 h dark/16 h light cycle with
temperature ranging from 16�C (during the night) to 21�C during theilluminated period.
RT-PCR amplifications
Approximately 2 g of fresh tissue was harvested in the middle of thelight phase (see culture conditions described above) for total RNAextraction with the Plant RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Courtabouef, France)following the supplier’s instructions. Twenty nanograms of purifiedtotal RNA was used to perform RT-PCR amplifications using the OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). Three different regions surrounding theT-DNA insertion site were targeted for amplification: upstream,downstream and spanning the T-DNA insertion site. The followingprimer pairs were used: Upstream region (305 bp fragment) prim-ers – SS5for51: 5¢-AACAACCAGACGAAATCAAACA-3¢ and SS5rev5:5¢-AAGCCAAGAACGGAGCCAGAAC-3¢. Spanning region (286 bpfragment) primers – AtSS5for1: 5¢-TTTCCGTCCGATCGCCAGT-CTC-3¢ and AtSS5rev1: 5¢-TACGCCAAAGTCAGCCATTACAA-3¢.Downstream region (554 bp fragment) primers – SS5for32: 5¢-AT-GTTTGTGGTTCTTTGCCGATAG-3¢ and SS5rev32: 5¢-CCACCCGAC-TGCTCCATACC-3¢.
Determination of starch and WSP contents and spectral
properties of the iodine–starch complex
A full account of amyloglucosidase assays and kmax (maximalabsorbance wavelength of the iodine–polysaccharide complex)measures can be found in Delrue et al. (1992). Starch and water-soluble glucan contents in leaves were determined as described inZeeman et al. (1998).
Extraction and purification of starch
Arabidopsis leaves were harvested at the end of the light period.Approximately 10 g of fresh material was homogenized using aTissue Tearor (Biospec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) in30 ml of the following buffer: 100 mM 3-(N-morpholino) propane-sulphonic acid (MOPS), pH 7.2, 5 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) ethanediol.The homogenate was filtered through two layers of Miracloth andcentrifuged for 15 min at 4�C and 4000 g. The pellet was resus-pended in 30 ml Percoll 90% (v/v) and centrifuged for 40 min at 4�Cand 10 000 g. The starch pellet was washed six times with distilledsterile water (10 min at 4�C and 10 000 g between each wash).Starch was finally stored at 4�C in 20% ethanol.
Separation of starch polysaccharides by size exclusion
chromatography
Starch (1.5–2.0 mg) was dissolved in 500 ll of 10 mM NaOH andsubsequently applied to a Sepharose CL-2B column (0.5 cmi.d. · 65 cm), which was equilibrated and eluted with 10 mM NaOH.Fractions of 300 ll were collected at a rate of one fraction per1.5 min. Glucans in the fractions were detected by their reactionwith iodine and levels of amylopectin and amylose were deter-mined by amyloglucosidase assays.
Chain length distribution of polysaccharides
Amylopectin CL distribution was established by HPAEC-PAD(Dionex, Voisins Le Bretonneux, France) after complete debranching.
408 David Delvalle et al.
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
A complete description of this technique can be found in Fontaineet al. (1993). Debranching procedure is as follows: after purificationon sepharose CL-2B column, 500 lg of amylopectin was dialysedagainst distilled water and subsequently lyophilized. The amylo-pectin pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 55 mM sodium acetate, pH3.5, and incubated overnight at 42�C with 20 U of isoamylase (Ha-yashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Okayama, Japan) and 1 U ofpullulanase (Sigma). Salts were subsequently removed by runningthe sample through an ‘Extract-clean’ Carbograph column (Alltech,Deerfield, IL, USA).
b-amylase digestion of amylopectin
After purification on sepharose CL-2B column, 500 lg of amylo-pectin was dialysed against distilled water and lyophilized. Theamylopectin pellet was resuspended in 500 ll of 55 mM sodiumacetate, pH 3.5, and incubated for 4 h at 30�C with 17 U of b-amylasefrom sweet potato (Sigma). To ensure complete digestion, sameamount of b-amylase was added to the sample for a further 20 hincubation (production of reducing power is monitored during thereaction using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid assay at 540 nm). Enzymaticreaction was stopped by boiling the sample for 5 min. The samplewas then debranched as described above by isoamylase (20 U) andpullulanase (1 U) and the corresponding glucans were analysed byHPAEC-PAD chromatography (Dionex).
Branching level determination
Branching level of amylopectin was measured by methylationanalysis. Amylopectin (200 lg) was dissolved in 300 ll of anhy-drous dimethyl sulphoxide at 80�C for 1 h. Methylation was per-formed with 500 ll iodomethane in the presence of 50 mg NaOH.The sample was sonicated in a water bath for 1 h and left in the darkovernight at room temperature. The reaction was stopped byaddition of chloroform (2 ml), two crystals of sodium thiosulphateand water (2 ml). The chloroform phase was washed six times withwater (2 ml), dried and lyophilized. Another cycle of methylationwas performed to ensure complete methylation of the polysaccha-ride. The sample was suspended in 25 ll of acetone and washydrolysed in trifluoroacetic acid 4 M (1 ml) for 4 h at 100�C.Trifluoroacetic acid was removed by four cycles of distillation withethanol. The sample was dried. Reduction was performed by addi-tion of BD4Na 20 mg ml)1 (500 ll) in ammoniac for 2 h at roomtemperature. The reaction was stopped by addition of acetic acid5%. Boric acid was removed by six rounds of distillation withmethanol. The sample was dried and lyophilized. Peracetylationwas performed by addition of 500 ll acetic anhydride for 4 h at100�C. The sample was dried and suspended in 1.5 ml of chloro-form. The chloroform fraction was washed six times with 2 ml ofwater and was filtrated on anhydrous Na2SO4. Quantitative analysisof the sample was performed by gas chromatography [Varian 3400apparatus equipped with a flame ionization detector and a glassstick evaporator (Varian, Les Ulis, France)] on a capillary column(EC.Tm-1, 30 m · 0.25 mm; Alltech). Column temperature was setfrom 120 to 240�C, with a temperature gradient of 2�C min)1.Detector temperature was set at 250�C.
Zymogram techniques
Soluble starch synthase activities. Proteins (100 lg) from a leafcrude extract were loaded on a native PAGE (7.5% acrylamide)containing 0.3% of rabbit liver glycogen. After migration (under
native condition for 3 h at 4�C at 15 V cm)1), the gel was incubatedovernight at room temperature in the following buffer: Glygly/NaOH50 mM (pH 9), (NH4)2SO4 100 mM, b-mercaptoethanol 5 mM, MgCl25 mM, BSA 0.25 g l)1 and ADP-Glc 1 mM. Starch synthase activitieswere revealed by iodine solution.
enzymes). Proteins (100 lg) from a leaf crude extract were loa-ded on native PAGE (7.5% acrylamide) containing soluble potatostarch (0.3% final concentration). After migration (under nativecondition for 3 h at 4�C at 15 V cm)1), the gel was incubated over-night at room temperature in the following buffer: Tris/HCl 100 mM
(pH 7.0), MgCl2 1 mM, CaCl2 1 mM and DTT 1 mM. Starch-modifyingactivities were revealed by iodine staining.
Starch phosphorylases. Proteins (100 lg) from a leaf crudeextract were loaded on native PAGE (7.5% acrylamide) containing0.75% (w/v final concentration) of rabbit liver glycogen and separ-ated for 3 h at 4�C at 15 V cm)1 under native conditions. Aftermigration, the gel was incubated overnight at room temperature insodium citrate 100 mM (pH 7.0) and G-1-P 20 mM (glucose-1-phos-phate). Iodine staining of the gel revealed starch phosphorylaseactivities.
Phosphoglucomutases. Proteins (100 lg) from a leaf crude ex-tract were loaded on native PAGE (7.5% acrylamide). After migra-tion (under native condition for 3 h at 4�C at 15 V cm)1), the gel wasincubated at room temperature in the following buffer: Tris/HCl200 mM (pH 7.0), EDTA 1 mM, MgCl2 50 mM, glucose-1-phosphate15 mM, NAD 0.5 mM, NADP 0.25 mM, glucose-1,6-diphosphate0.05 mM, 17 U of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide 1 mM and 5-methyl-phena-zinium methyl sulphate 0.5 mM. The reaction wasusually stopped after 1 h of incubation at room temperature.
Pullulanase. Proteins (100 lg) from a leaf crude extract wereloaded on native PAGE (7.5% acrylamide) containing azure-pullulan(0.3% final concentration). After migration (under native conditionfor 3 h at 4�C at 15 V cm)1), the gel was incubated overnight at roomtemperature in the following buffer: Tris/HCl 100 mM (pH 7.0), MgCl21 mM, CaCl2 1 mM and DTT 1 mM. Pullulanase activity appears as awhite band on the gel.
In vitro assays of starch-metabolizing enzymes
Soluble starch synthases. Proteins (50 lg) were incubated at30�C for 30 min in 100 ll of the following buffer: Glygly/NaOH50 mM (pH 9), (NH4)2SO4 100 mM, b-mercaptoethanol 5 mM, MgCl25 mM, BSA 0.25 g l)1, [U14C]ADP-glucose (333 mCi mM
)1) 0.75 nM
and glycogen 10 mg ml)1. For the determination of the Km for ADP-glucose, various concentrations of non-radiolabelled ADP-glucosewere added to the buffer. For regular soluble starch synthase assay,1 mM of ADP-glucose was added to the reaction mixture. Thereaction was stopped by boiling for 10 min. After the addition of1 ml of 75% methanol/1% (w/v) KCl solution, the sample was cen-trifuged at 10 000 g at 4�C for 10 min. The pellet was rinsed twicewith 1 ml of 75% methanol/1% (w/v) KCl solution and dried at roomtemperature for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in 300 ll ofdistilled water, and finally counted in a scintillation counter after theaddition of 2 ml of counting solution (UltimaGold; Perkin-Elmer,Boston, MA, USA).
SSI mutant of Arabidopsis 409
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
Determination of the kinetics parameters of the recombinant
SSI. An equivalent of 5 lg of proteins was incubated at 30�C for30 min in 100 ll of the following buffer: Glygly/NaOH 50 mM (pH9), (NH4)2SO4 100 mM, b-mercaptoethanol 5 mM, MgCl2 5 mM,BSA 0.25 g l)1, [U14C]ADP-glucose (333 mCi mM
)1) 0.75 nM.10 mg ml)1 of malto-oligosaccharides (DP2–DP7), maize amylo-pectin, maize BLD or rabbit liver glycogen were added to thebuffer depending on the substrate to be tested. A final concen-tration of 1 mg ml)1 was used for incubation with wild type andAtss1-1 mutant amylopectin. Except for malto-oligosaccharides(DP2–DP7) the reaction was stopped by boiling for 10 min. Afterthe addition of 1 ml of 75% methanol/1% (w/v) KCl solution, thesample was centrifuged at 10 000 g at 4�C for 10 min. The pelletwas rinsed twice with 1 ml of 75% methanol/1% (w/v) KClsolution and dried at room temperature for 30 min. The pelletwas resuspended in 300 ll of distilled water, and finally countedin a scintillation counter after the addition of 2 ml of countingsolution.
When incubated with malto-oligosaccharides, the reaction wasstopped by boiling for 10 min and the glucans were elongated byincubation overnight at 30�C with 7.5 U of phosphorylase ‘a’ fromrabbit muscle (Sigma) in the presence of 50 mM of Glc-1-P (finalconcentration). The reaction was stopped by addition of 3.5 ml of75% methanol/1% (w/v) KCl solution and the samples were furthertreated as described above before counting.
ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. ADP-glucose pyrophospho-rylase (AGPase) activity was measured upon the degradation ofADP-glucose in the presence of PPi to produce ATP and Glc-1-P. Glc-1-P is transformed to Glc-6-P (glucose-6-phosphate) by phospho-glucomutase. Glc-6-P is oxidized to D-gluconate-6-phosphate byglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and NADP. The production ofNADPH, Hþ is finally monitored at 365 nm.
Proteins (100 lg) from a leaf crude extract were added to areaction mixture to provide a final volume of 500 ll with thefollowing concentration: GlyGly/NaOH 80 mM (pH 7.5), PPi 1 mM,MgCl2 60 mM, glucose-1,6-diphosphate 0.05 mM, NADP 0.25 mM,NAF 10 mM, ADP-glucose 1 mM and acid 3-phosphoglyceric (3-PGA) 3 mM (added when necessary). After 30 min incubation at30�C, the sample was boiled for 10 min to stop the reaction. Thesample was cleared by centrifugation and the supernatant wascollected to measure the concentration of Glc-1-P. After addition of1 U phosphoglucomutase and 1 U glucose-6-phosphate dehydrog-enase, the absorbance was monitored at 365 nm.
a and b-Amylases, pullulanase, a-1,4 glucanotransferase, starch-phosphorylase, starch branching enzymes and maltase activitieswere determined as described in Zeeman et al. (1998).
Western blot analysis
Soluble proteins (100 lg) were separated by electrophoresis onSDS-PAGE gel (7.5% acrylamide and 0.1% SDS). Before blottingproteins onto PVDF membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech),gels were incubated for 10 min in a Western blot buffer [48 mM Tris,39 mM glycine, 0.0375% (w/v) SDS, and 20% methanol]. The transferwas carried out using the Mini Trans-Blot Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules,CA, USA), for 90 min at 100 mA with the same Western blot buffer.After blocking for 1 h in a 1% milk solution made in TBS-T buffer[20 mM Tris base, 137 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween20, pH 7.6 with 1 M
HCl], membranes were incubated overnight at 4�C with the anti-serum diluted in TBS buffer [20 mM Tris base, 137 mM NaCl, pH 7.6with 1 M HCl]. After incubation, membranes were rinsed severaltimes in TBS-T buffer at room temperature before immunodetection
with a biotin and streptavidin/alkalin phosphatase kit (Sigma) fol-lowing the supplier’s instruction.
Cloning of the SSI cDNA and expression in E. coli
The open reading frame of SSI was amplified by PCR usingprimers containing the recombination sequences of the GatewayCloning System (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France). The PCRproduct was cloned by recombination in the Gateway pDONR201vector following the manufacturer’s instruction. The SSI cDNAwas then inserted by a second recombination step in the GatewaypDEST15 vector, allowing the expression of the N-terminus GST-tagged fusion protein in E. coli BL21 strain. After a 4-h inductionin LB medium containing 0.2% L-arabinose, the GST-tagged pro-tein was purified using the MagneGST purification system fol-lowing the supplier’s instruction.
Transmission electron microscopy
To avoid material losses as well as heterogeneous distribution, wetsamples were first embedded in 3% (w/v) agar solution (tempera-ture below 40�C). After the agar solution had solidified, small cubesof samples (1 mm3) were cut out and treated for 20 min in 1%periodic acid, washed in deionized water, treated in a saturatedsolution of thiosemicarbazide for 24 h, washed again and finallytreated with 1% (w/v) AgNO3 for 24 h (PATAg treatment) accordingto Gallant et al. (1973). Samples were then washed and embeddedin Nanoplast (Helbert et al., 1996). After Nanoplast polymerization(10 days), the samples were again embedded in LR White HardGrade. Sections (0.1 mm thick) were obtained using a diamondknife (Microm MT-7000, Bal-Tec RMC; Tucson, AZ, USA), andexamined under 80 keV with a JEOL (Croissy sur seine, France) 100Stransmission electron microscope.
X-ray diffraction measurements
Crystallinity level of the starch samples was determined by X-raydiffraction as already described in Pohu et al. (2004).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Genoplante (program no. Af2001030),the CNRS, the Region Nord-Pas de Calais (program ARCir), theMinistere Delegue a la Recherche (grant no. JC5145 ACI Jeunes-Chercheurs) and the Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencias(grant no. BIO2003-00431). We are grateful to Frederic Chirat for hisassistance with FACE and Yves Leroy for his assistance with HPAEC-PAD and gas chromatography.
Supplementary Material
The following supplementary material is available for this articleonline:Figure S1. Determination of the intracellular localization of SSI.Figure S2. Determination of GBSSI level.Figure S3. Expression and purification of recombinant SSI ex-pressed in E. coli.Figure S4. Determination of the transcription level of SSI in differentorgans of Arabidopsis.Figure S5. Evolution of the transcript level of SSI in Arabidopsisleaves during a 24 h cycle.
410 David Delvalle et al.
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
Abel, G., Springer, F., Willmitzer, L. and Kossmann, J. (1996) Clo-ning and functional analysis of a cDNA encoding a novel 139 kDastarch synthase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J. 10,981–991.
Baba, T., Nishihara, M., Mizumo, K., Kawasaki, T., Shimada, H.,
Kobayashi, E., Ohnishi, S., Tanaka, K.-I. and Arai, Y. (1993) Iden-tification, cDNA cloning, and gene expression of soluble starchsynthase in rice (Oryza sativa L.) immature seeds. Plant Physiol.103, 565–573.
Ball, S.G. and Morell, M.K. (2003) From bacterial glycogen to starch:understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Annu.Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 207–233.
Ball, S.G., van de Wal, M.H.B.J. and Visser, R.G.F. (1998) Progress inunderstanding the biosynthesis of amylose. Trends Plant Sci. 3,462–467.
Balzergue, S., Dubreucq, B., Chauvin, S. et al. (2001) Improved PCR-walking for large-scale isolation of plant T-DNA borders. Bio-techniques, 30, 496–504.
Bechtold, N., Ellis, J. and Pelletier, G. (1993) In planta Agrobacteri-um mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsisthaliana plants. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Life Sci. 316, 1194–1199.
Bouchez, D., Camilleri, C. and Caboche, M. (1993) A binary vectorbased on Basta resistance for in planta transformation of Ara-bidopsis thaliana. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Life Sci. 316, 1188–1193.
Boyer, C.D. and Preiss, J. (1979) Properties of citrate-stimulatedstarch synthesis catalyzed by starch synthase I of developingmaize kernels. Plant Physiol. 64, 1039–1042.
Buleon, A., Gallant, D., Bouchet, B., Mouille, G., D’Hulst, C., Koss-
mann, J. and Ball, S. (1997) Starches from A to C: Chlamydo-monas reinhardtii as a model microbial system to investigate thebiosynthesis of the plant amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 115,949–957.
Buleon, A., Colonna, P., Planchot, V. and Ball, S. (1998) Starchgranules: structure and biosynthesis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 23,85–112.
Cao, H., James, M.G. and Myers, A.M. (2000) Purification andcharacterization of soluble starch synthases from maize endo-sperm. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 373, 135–146.
Commuri, P.D. and Keeling, P.L. (2001) Chain-length specificities ofmaize starch synthase I enzyme: studies of glucan affinity andcatalytic properties. Plant J. 25, 475–486.
Delrue, B., Fontaine, T., Routier, F., Decq, A., Wieruszeski, J.-M., van
den Koornhuyse, N., Maddelein, M.-L., Fournet, B. and Ball, S.
(1992) Waxy Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: monocellular algalmutants defective in amylose biosynthesis and granule-boundstarch-synthase activity accumulate a structurally modifiedamylopectin. J. Bacteriol. 174, 3612–3620.
Denyer, K., Sidebottom, C., Hylton, C. and Smith, A.M. (1993) Sol-uble isoforms of starch synthase and starch-branching enzymealso occur within starch granules in developing pea embryos.Plant J. 4, 191–198.
Denyer, K., Barber, L., Burton, R. et al. (1995) The isolation andcharacterization of novel low-amylose mutants of Pisum sativumL. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1019–1026.
Denyer, K., Clarke, B., Hylton, C., Tatge, H. and Smith, A. (1996) Theelongation of amylose and amylopectine chains in isolated starchgranules. Plant J. 10, 1135–1143.
Duprat, F., Gallant, D., Guilbot, A., Mercier, C. and Robin, J.-P. (1980)L’amidon. In Les polymeres vegetaux (Monties, B., ed.). Paris,France: Gauthier-Villars, pp. 176–231.
Edwards, A., Marshall, J., Denyer, K., Sidebottom, C., Visser, R.G.F.,
Martin, C. and Smith, A. (1996) Evidence that a 77-kilodalton
protein from the starch of pea embryos is an isoform of starchsynthase that is both soluble and granule bound. Plant Physiol.112, 89–97.
Edwards, A., Fulton, D.C., Hylton, C.M., Jobling, S.A., Gidley, M.,
Rossner, U., Martin, C. and Smith, A.M. (1999) A combinedreduction in activity of starch synthases II and III of potato hasnovel effects on the starch of tubers. Plant J. 17, 251–261.
Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H. and von Heijne, G. (1999) ChloroP, aneural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transitpeptides and their cleavage sites. Protein Sci. 8, 978–984.
Fontaine, T., D’Hulst, C., Maddelein, M.-L. et al. (1993) Toward anunderstanding of the biogenesis of the starch granule. Evidencethat Chlamydomonas soluble starch synthase II controls thesynthesis of intermediate size glucans of amylopectin. J. Biol.Chem. 268, 16223–16230.
Gallant, D., Derrien, A., Aumaitre, A. and Guilbot, A. (1973) Degra-dation in vitro de l’amidon par le suc pancreatique. Etude parmicroscopie electronique a transmission et a balayage. Starch,25, 56–64.
Gao, M., Wanat, J., Stinard, P.S., James, M.G. and Myers, A.M.
(1998) Characterization of dull1, a maize gene coding for a novelstarch synthase. Plant Cell, 10, 399–412.
Guan, H.-P. and Preiss, J. (1993) Differentiation of the properties ofthe branching isoenzymes from maize (Zea mays). Plant Physiol.102, 1269–1273.
Helbert, W., Schulein, M. and Henrissat, B. (1996) Electron micro-scopic investigation of the diffusion of Bacillus lichenformisa-amylase into corn starch granules. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 19,165–169.
Hizukuri, S. (1986) Polymodal distribution of the chain lengths ofamylopectins, and its significance. Carbohydr. Res. 147, 342–347.
Hovenkamp-Hermelink, J., Jacobsen, E., Ponstein, A., Visser, R.,
Vos-Scheperkeuter, G., Bijmolt, E., de Vries, J., Witholt, B. and
Feenstra, W. (1987) Isolation of an amylose-free starch mutant ofthe potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 75, 217–221.
Forster, C., Wasserman, B.P. and Keeling, P.L. (1998) Molecularcloning of starch synthase I from maize (W64) endosperm andexpression in Escherichia coli. Plant J. 14, 613–622.
Kossmann, J., Abel, G.J.W., Springer, F., Lloyd, J.R. and Willmitzer,
L. (1999) Cloning and functional analysis of a cDNA encoding astarch synthase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) that ispredominantly expressed in leaf tissue. Planta, 208, 503–511.
Li, Z., Rahman, S., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Mouille, G., Appels, R. and
Morell, M.K. (1999) Cloning and characterization of geneencoding wheat starch synthase I. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98,1208–1216.
Li, Z., Sun, F., Xu, S. et al. (2003) The structural organization of thegene encoding class II starch synthase of wheat and barley andthe evolution of the genes encoding starch synthases in plants.Funct. Integr. Genomics, 3, 76–85.
Lloyd, J.R., Landschutze, V. and Kossmann, J. (1999) Simultaneousantisense inhibition of two starch-synthase isoforms of potatotubers leads to accumulation of grossly modified amylopectin.Biochem. J. 338, 515–521.
SSI mutant of Arabidopsis 411
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412
Van Den Koornhuyse, N., Fontaine, T., Wieruszeski, J.M., Decq,
A. and Ball, S.G. (1994) Toward an understanding of the biogen-esis of the starch granule: determination of granule-boundand soluble starch synthase functions in amylopectin synthesis.J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25150–25157.
Marshall, J., Sidebottom, C., Debet, M., Martin, C., Smith, A. and
Edwards, A. (1996) Identification of the major starch synthasein the soluble fraction of potato tubers. Plant Cell, 8, 1121–1135.
Morell, M.K., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Cmiel, M., Samuel, M.S., Chandler,
P., Rahman, S., Buleon, A., Batey, I.L. and Li, Z. (2003) Barley sex6mutants lack starch synthase IIa activity and contain a starch withnovel properties. Plant J. 34, 173–185.
Wasserman, B.P. (1994) Association of a 76 kDa polypeptide withsoluble starch synthase I activity in maize (cv B73) endosperm.Plant J. 6, 151–159.
Mu-Forster, C., Huang, R., Powers, J.R., Harriman, R.W., Knight, M.,
Singletary, G., Keeling, P. and Wasserman, B.P. (1996) Physicalassociation of starch biosynthetic enzymes with starch granulesof maize endosperm. Granule-associated forms of starch syn-thase I and starch branching enzyme II. Plant Physiol. 111, 821–829.
Myers, A.M., Morell, M.K., James, M.G. and Ball, S.G. (2000) Recentprogress toward understanding biosynthesis of the amylopectincrystal. Plant Physiol. 122, 989–997.
Nakamura, Y. (2002) Towards a better understanding of the meta-bolic system for amylopectin biosynthesis in plants: rice endo-sperm as a model tissue. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 718–725.
Pohu, A., Planchot, V., Putaux, J.L., Colonna, P. and Buleon, A.
(2004) Split crystallisation during debranching of maltodextrins athigh concentration by isoamylase. Biomacromolecules, 5, 1792–1798.
Ral, J.-P., Derelle, E., Ferraz, C. et al. (2004) Starch division andpartitioning a mechanism for granule propagation and mainten-
ance in the picophytoplanktonic green alga Ostreococcus tauri.Plant Physiol., 136, 3333–3340.
Scheidig, A., Frohlich, A., Schulze, S., Lloyd, J.R. and Kossmann, J.
(2002) Downregulation of a chloroplast-targeted b-amylase leadsto a starch-excess phenotype in leaves. Plant J. 30, 581–591.
Sessions, A., Burke, E., Presting, G. et al. (2002) A high-throughputArabidopsis reverse genetics system. Plant Cell, 14, 2985–2994.
Takeda, Y., Guan, H.-P. and Preiss, J. (1993) Branching of amyloseby branching isoenzymes of maize endosperm. Carbohydr. Res.240, 253–263.
Tanaka, K.-I., Ohnishi, S., Kishimoto, N., Kawasaki, T. and Baba, T.
(1995) Structure, organization, and chromosomal location of thegene encoding a form of rice soluble starch synthase. PlantPhysiol. 108, 677–683.
Tsai, C.-Y. (1974) The function of the Waxy locus in starch synthesisin maize endosperm. Biochem. Genet. 11, 83–95.
van de Wal, M., D’Hulst, C., Vincken, J.-P., Buleon, A., Visser, R. and
Ball, S. (1998) Amylose is synthesized in vitro by extension of andcleavage from amylopectin. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22232–22240.
Wattebled, F., Buleon, A., Bouchet, B., Ral, J.-P., Lienard, L.,
Delvalle, D., Binderup, K., Dauvillee, D., Ball, S. and D’Hulst, C.
(2002) Granule bound starch synthase I: a major enzyme involvedin the biogenesis of B-crystallites in starch granules. Eur. J. Bio-chem. 269, 3810–3820.
Zeeman, S.C., Northrop, F., Smith, A.M. and ap Rees, T. (1998) Astarch-accumulating mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana deficient ina chloroplastic starch-hydrolysing enzyme. Plant J. 15, 357–365.
Zeeman, S.C., Thorneycroft, D., Schupp, N., Chapple, A., Weck,
M., Dunstan, H., Haldimann, P., Bechtold, N., Smith, A.M. and
Smith, S.M. (2004) Plastidial a-glucan phosphorylase is notrequired for starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves but has arole in the tolerance of abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 135, 849–858.
Zhang, X., Colleoni, C., Ratushna, V., Sirghie-Colleoni, M., James,
M.G. and Myers, A.M. (2004) Molecular characterization demon-strates that the Zea mays gene sugary2 codes for the starchsynthase isoform SSIIa. Plant Mol. Biol. 54, 865–879.
412 David Delvalle et al.
ª Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2005), 43, 398–412