Solid Waste Collection Alternatives Assessment Study Presentation to the City of Lakeland Commission May 1, 2009
Feb 20, 2016
Solid Waste Collection Alternatives Assessment
StudyPresentation to the City of Lakeland
Commission
May 1, 2009
Focus of Study
1. Study and Analyze Conversion to Automated Collection Service
2. Evaluate Alternatives for Alley Collection3. Study and Evaluate City Roll-Off
Collection Services
Solid Waste Division
Services Provided• Residential Collection
– Bulk Waste– Yard Waste
• Recyclables Collection• Commercial Waste
Collection
Division Staffing
Position Budgeted Number
City Pay Grade
Salary Range ($)
Manager of Solid Waste
1 65 61,630 – 95,617
Supervisor of Solid Waste
3 54 47,132 – 73,153
Solid Waste Foreman 2 47 39,748 – 61,630 Solid Waste Collection Driver III
17 31 26,894 – 41,724
Account Clerk III 1 29 25,604 – 39,748 Office Associate II 1 29 26,894 – 41,724 Solid Waste Collection Driver II
15 29 25,604 – 39,748
Customer Service Representative II
1 29 26,894 – 41,724
Solid Waste Collection Driver I
10 24 22,692 – 35,172
Customer Service Representative I
1 24 22,692 – 35,172
Solid Waste Collector 33 20 20,571 -31,907 Total 85
Trucks in Operation
Program Services
Trucks in Operation Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Refuse (Residential and Commercial)
15 14 0 15 14
Yard Waste 0 0 15 0 0 Single- Family Recycling
5 5 5 5 5
Multi-Family Recycling
1 1 1 1 1
Grapple Yard Waste
4 4 4 4 4
Grapple Junk 1 1 1 1 1 Appliance 1 1 1 1 0 27 26 27 27 25
Residential Routes
Worker Safety
• Add Movie
Workers Compensation ClaimsType of Injury Number of
Claims Total
Compensation ($)
Back/ Neck 388 139,123.91 Eyes 60 4,473.73 Fall or Thrown from Vehicle 90 21,694.98 Groin 33 27,135.56 Hopper 8 613.53 Insect Bite 51 5,042.01 Knee/ Ankle/ Leg 1,316 828,673.18 Laceration or Stab 67 8,825.44 Miscellaneous 126 22,756.28 Shoulder 323 120,951.01 Toes/ Foot 29 2,522.62 Wrist/ Elbow/ Arm 148 23,543.79
Total 2,639 1,205,356.04
America’s Most Dangerous Professions
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) Report, 2007
Ranking Profession Deaths Per 100,000 Workers
Number of Deaths
1 Fisherman 111.8 38 2 Loggers 86.4 87 3 Aircraft Pilots 66.7 82 4 Iron and Steelworkers 45.5 40 5 Farmers and Ranchers 38.4 285 6 Roofers 29.4 79 7 Electrical Workers 24.1 30 8 Truckers 26.2 904 9 Solid Waste Collectors 22.8 18 10 Police Officers and Sheriffs 21.4 143
Advantages of Automated Collection
• Residents– Convenient and easy method– Wheeled containers are more
maneuverable and safer– High capacity– Keep rodents and pets out of
trash– Cleaner neighborhoods
• City– Improved efficiency– Reduced worker injuries– Lower turnover rate– Reduced Worker’s
Compensation claims
Disadvantages of Automated Collection
• Vehicles will require more maintenance• Homeowners will require education at
initiation• May not work in areas with on street parking
Man’s Carbon Footprint
Reduction Due to Automation
Comparisons
Issues With Alley Collection
Vehicle Mirror Clearances
Right Angle Turns
Alley Narrower Than Vehicle
Helpers Assist Driver
Issues With Alley Collection
Utility Pole Obstacles
Industry Trends
Benchmarking
City Number of Alley Customers
Number of Alley Routes
Extra Costs/Charges to Customers
Problems Experienced by City Attempt to move away from Alley Collection?
Service Costs to City/Damages
Incurred St. Petersburg Estimated 40% Estimated 40% None Damage to fences, low hanging
phone and cable wires, and building eaves
No (more efficient) No major costs
Tampa 8,000 homes Five; Bi-weekly service
None Damage to eaves, overgrowth, low-hanging wires, encroachment
on City’s right-of-way
Yes, though not successful (limited parking makes the
transition problematic)
No major costs
Jacksonville 800 premises Roughly 2 None Damage to trucks due to overgrowth, hit eaves
First attempted in 1994 – have attempted every few years since then
15%-20% increase in costs for alley
services Kissimmee 15 containers
(commercial) One Standard
commercial rate Overhanging wires (Fully
Automated Collection)/ Delivery trucks parked in alley
No Nothing major – One incident with
an eave (new driver)
North Miami Beach Average 975 containers per day
(twice weekly service)
Estimated 60% None Damage to trucks from overgrowth, Cans in alleyway
Yes, currently attempting Repairs to collection vehicles for damage from
overgrowth Lake Wales Estimated 70% Estimated 70% None Trucks have difficulty staying in
right-of-way (damage roads and curbs)
Brief discussion – Residents vocal about keeping
service
Have to resurface alleys and fix curbs
Ocala Prior to termination of service*, estimated
30% of residential collection service
Estimated 30% None Overgrowth, property infringement, corner lot damage
(curbs, roadways)
Discontinued service* Repairs to roadway
West Palm Beach Estimated 10% One route is half alleys, other
routes have an alley or two
None Overgrowth, telephone wires & polls, bags in alleyway
Have moved away from alley collection with exception of one neighborhood
Some minor damage to trucks
Sanford Estimated 5% of 12,000 homes
Multiple routes contain some
alley collection
None Overgrowth, damage to water meters and roads
Some discussion, no formal movement
Repairs to roads and utility equipment
Orlando 2,000 homes Two neighborhood
routes
None Overgrowth, damage to eaves & curbs
No Nothing major – curb reparation
Roll Off Collection
Non-Exclusive Franchisees
Entity Agreement Date Status/Comment Accurate Waste Systems November 1, 2006 Not in Operation B&S Land Development, LLC February 20, 2008 Dumpsterite April 25, 2006 Florida Refuse Services, Inc. June 15, 2000 Freedom Waste February 13, 2004 Sold to Florida Refuse Johnson’s Excavation and Service August 3, 2005 JVS Contracting, Inc. October 16, 2007 Liberty Waste June 15, 2000 Pulled Out Prescott Septic August 3, 2005 No work since 2005 Stidham’s Rental, Inc. October 1, 2003 Sunshine Recycling September 1, 2006 Pulled Out The Dumpster Company August 29, 2005 WCA of Florida, LLC July 9, 2007 Waste Management, Inc. June 15, 2000 Waste Services of Florida March 12, 2008 Webb’s Can-It March 12, 2008 Small Jobs only
Benchmarking
City Number of Roll-Off
Companies
City Provides Direct Roll-Off
Service
Service Length Franchise or Permit
Operation
Cost of Permit/Franchis
e Fee
Exclusive or Open
Competition
City Provided Compactor Container Service
Annual Franchise Audit
St. Petersburg Approx. 7 Yes Temporary and Permanent
Yes $1.62 x size of container
Exclusive Yes Yes Internal
Gainesville Estimated 10-12
No N/ A Yes, Franchise Flat fee dependent upon axles
$500-$1,500 N/ A N/ A Yes Internal
Jacksonville 3 major/ 6 small
No N/ A Yes, Franchise 17% N/ A No Yes Internal
Largo 1 Yes Temporary and Permanent
No N/ A Exclusive Yes N/ A N/ A
Miami 22 Yes (City facilities)
Temporary and Permanent
Yes, Franchise 22% Exclusive No Yes Internal
Dunedin 2 permanent 6 temporary
Yes Temporary and Permanent
Yes, Franchise 25% Open No No N/ A
Clearwater Estimated 15-20
Yes Temporary and Permanent
Yes, Permit 15% Open Yes Yes Internal
Daytona Beach 19 Yes (Garbage1/ C
&D 19)
Temporary and Permanent
Yes $1,000/ year (permit)
$1 per yard (franchise)
Open No No Audit, as
needed, external
Lake Worth 1 No Temporary and Permanent
Yes, Franchise N/ A Exclusive No Yes Internal
Tallahassee Approx. 8 Yes Permanent No N/ A Garbage Exclusive/ C&D Open
No No N/ A
Lighthouse Point 1 No N/ A No N/ A N/ A No No N/ A Plantation 3-7 No N/ A Yes, Franchise Under
negotiation Open No Yes Internal
OptionsKey Components Service Scenarios Method Exclusive Franchise,
Private Operation Exclusive Franchise, City Operation
Current Multiple, Private Provider System and Department Service
Collector Selection Bid Sole source Permitting of as many collectors as are qualified and willing to operate within City
Service Collector to provide regular service to all residence and commercial businesses requesting service
Department to provide regular service to all residence and commercial businesses requesting service
Collectors to provide regular service to all residence and commercial businesses requesting service
Term Five year Five year Annual renewal Service Area City-wide service area City-wide service
area City-wide service area
Rates and Fees Rate is established in franchisee bid; generators pay collector
City sets rate; generators pay City
Companies operate in competitive market
Reporting and Auditing Single audit with responsibilities established by contract; monthly submittal of franchise fee
Uses City accounting system
Monthly submittal of franchise fee. Difficult and costly to audit permittee books and records
Disposal Franchisee is required to use County Landfill; enables all City generators to receive County tipping fee discount
City uses County Landfill; enables all City generators to receive County tipping fee discount
Permit holders can use any permitted Landfill; City generators maybe receive County tipping fee discount
Recycling/Diversion City/ franchisee provides free audit information
City provides free audit information to generators
No information provided
Emergency Services Single source responsibility for debris management
Single source responsibility for debris management
Current system does not mandate that they will provide services
Comparisons
Exclusive Franchise System Non-Exclusive Franchise System Lowest competitive and equitable rates for
all businesses (large and small) More efficient vehicle collection routes
resulting in less vehicles, reduced greenhouse gas emissions and less wear-and-tear on City streets
More efficient and successful diversion of recyclables from the waste stream
Accountability for diversion of commercial recyclables and sharing of non-compliance risk
Provides City the ability to manage performance and customer service satisfaction levels through performance clauses in franchise agreement
Greater customer choice Greater ability to adapt to unique
customer needs The ability (in some cases) to
easily change haulers if the customer is dissatisfied
Recommendations
• Automated Collection
Recommendations
• Alley Collection
Recommendations
• Roll-Off Collection