Top Banner
1 Solar Spectrum
91

Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

Nov 26, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

1

Solar Spectrum

Page 2: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

2

Solar Spectrum

-Black body radiation

Light bulb 3000°K Red->Yellow->White Surface of Sun 6000°K

Page 3: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

3

Solar Spectrum

-Black body radiation

Light bulb 3000°K Red->Yellow->White Surface of Sun 6000°K

Page 4: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

4

Solar Spectrum

-Black body radiation

Light bulb 3000°K Red->Yellow->White Surface of Sun 6000°K

Page 5: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

5

Solar Spectrum

-Atmospheric Absorption and Scattering

Light bulb 3000°K Red->Yellow->White Surface of Sun 6000°K

Page 6: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

6

Solar Spectrum

-Atmospheric Absorption and Scattering

Light bulb 3000°K Red->Yellow->White Surface of Sun 6000°K

Page 7: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

7

Solar Spectrum

-Atmospheric Absorption and Scattering Air Mass through which solar radiation passes

Page 8: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

8

Solar Spectrum

-Atmospheric Absorption and Scattering Air Mass through which solar radiation passes

Page 9: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

9

Page 10: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

10

Page 11: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

11

Page 12: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

12

30% lost to Rayleigh Scattering λ-4 (blue sky/orange sunset) Scattering by aerosols (Smoke, Dust and Haze S.K. Friedlander)

Absorption: Ozone all below 0.3 µm, CO2, O2, H2O

Page 13: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

13

10% added to AM1 for clear skies by diffuse component Increases with cloud cover

½ lost to clouds is recovered in diffuse radiation

Page 14: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

14

Page 15: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

15

Page 16: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

16

Direct and Diffuse Radiation

Global Radiation = Direct + Diffuse Radiation

AM1.5 Global AM1.5G irradiance for equator facing 37° tilted surface on earth (app. A1)

Integral over all wavelengths is 970 W/m2 (or 1000 W/m2 for normalized spectrum) is a standard to rate PV Close to maximum power received at the earths surface.

Appendix A1

Page 17: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

17

Standard Spectrum is compared to Actual Spectrum for a site Solar Insolation Levels

March

June

September

December

Page 18: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

18

Cape Town/Melbourne/Chattanooga Gibraltar/Beirut/Shanghai

Page 19: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

19

Appendix B

Page 20: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

20

Page 21: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

21

Page 22: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

22

Need: -Global radiation on a horizontal surface -Horizontal direct and diffuse components of global value -Estimate for tilted plane value Equations given in Chapter on Sunlight

Peak sun hours reduces a days variation to a fixed number of peak hours for calculations

SSH = Sunshine Hours Total number of hours above 210 W/m2 for a month

Equations in Chapter 1 to convert SSH to a useful form.

Page 23: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

23

Estimates of Diffuse Component Clearness Index KT = diffuse/total This is calculaed following the algorithm given in the chapter Use number of sunny and cloudy days to calculate diffuse and direct insolation Described in the book

Page 24: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

24

Tilted Surfaces

PV is mounted at a fixed tilt angle

Page 25: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

25

Sunny versus Cloudy

Page 26: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

26

Page 27: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

27

Calculation for Optimal Tilt Angle

Given in the Chapter

Page 28: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

28

1cosθ

Page 29: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

29

P-N Junctions and Commercial Photovoltaic Devices Chapter 2

Page 30: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

30

Page 31: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

31

Page 32: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

32

Czochralski Process

Page 33: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

33

Page 34: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

34

Page 35: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

35

Page 36: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

36

Page 37: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

37

Page 38: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

38

Page 39: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

39

Hot Wall CVD

Page 40: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

40

Plasma CVD

Page 41: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

41

Page 42: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

42

Page 43: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

43

Market Share

CIS= Copper Indium Gallium Selenide a-Si= Amorphous Silicon Ribbon= Multicrystalline Silicon from

Molten Bath CdTe= Cadium Telluride/Cadmium Sulfide Mono = Monocrystalline Silicaon Multi= Muticrystalline Silicon

Page 44: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

44

Positive ion cores

Negative ion cores Depleted of

Free Carriers

http://www.asdn.net/asdn/physics/p-n-junctions.shtml

Page 45: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

45

Carrier Generation Carrier Recombination Carrier Diffusion Carrier Drift in Depletion Region

due to inherent field

On average a minority carrier Travels the diffusion length Before recombining This is the diffusion current Carriers in the depletion region Are carried by the electric field This is the drift current In equilibrium drift = diffusion Net current = 0

Page 46: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

46

Page 47: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

47

I–V characteristics of a p–n junction diode (not to scale—the current in the reverse region is magnified compared to the forward region, resulting in the apparent slope discontinuity at the origin; the actual I–V curve is smooth across the origin).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode

Page 48: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

48

I–V characteristics of a p–n junction diode (not to scale—the current in the reverse region is magnified compared to the forward region, resulting in the apparent slope discontinuity at the origin; the actual I–V curve is smooth across the origin).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode

Page 49: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

49

Electron-hole pair -Generation

-Recombination

Carrier lifetime (1 µs) Carrier diffusion length (100-300 µm)

Page 50: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

50

Page 51: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

51

N=photon flux α=abs. coef.

x=surface depth G=generation rate

e-h pairs

Page 52: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

52

N=photon flux α=abs. coef.

x=surface depth G=generation rate

e-h pairs

Page 53: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

53

Page 54: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

54

Page 55: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

55

I0 is dark saturation current q electron charge V applied voltage

k Boltzmann Constant T absolute temperature

Page 56: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

56

N=photon flux α=abs. coef.

x=surface depth G=generation rate

e-h pairs

At x = 0 G =αN Function is G/Gx=0 = exp(-αx)

Electrons absorb the band gap energy

Page 57: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

57

Diode Equation Photovoltaic Equation

Silicon Solar Cell

Page 58: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

58

Efficiency of Light Conversion to e-h pair

Page 59: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

59

Short Circuit Current, V = 0

Page 60: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

60

Inefficiency of the e-h pair formation and collection process

Page 61: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

61

Voc drops in T because I0 increases

Open Circuit Voltage

http://pvcdrom.pveducation.org/CELLOPER/TEMP.HTM

Page 62: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

62

Maximum Power

Page 63: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

63

Effect of Shunt Resistance on fill factor

http://www.pv.unsw.edu.au/information-for/online-students/online-courses/photovoltaics-devices-applications/syllabus-details

Fill Factor

Page 64: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

64

Effect of Shunt Resistance on fill factor

http://www.pv.unsw.edu.au/information-for/online-students/online-courses/photovoltaics-devices-applications/syllabus-details

Fill Factor

Page 65: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

65

Page 66: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

66

Spectral Response

Quantum Efficiency = number of e-h pairs made per photon Band gap determines when this is greater than 0

Need band gap between 1.0 and 1.6 eV to match solar spectrum Si 1.1 eV Cd 1.5 eV

Page 67: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

67

Issues effecting quantum efficiency Absorption spectrum

Band Gap Spectral Responsivity = Amps per Watt of Incident Light

Short wavelengths => loss to heat Long wavelengths => weak absorption/finite diffusion length

Page 68: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

68

Page 69: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

69

Chapter 4 Cell Properties

Lab Efficiency ~ 24% Commercial Efficiency ~ 14%

Lab processes are not commercially viable

C is Cost of Generated Electricity ACC Capital Cost O&M is Operating and Maintenance Cost t is year E is energy produced in a year r is discount rate interest rate/(i.r. + 1)

Page 70: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

70

C is Cost of Generated Electricity ACC Capital Cost O&M is Operating and Maintenance Cost t is year E is energy produced in a year r is discount rate interest rate/(i.r. + 1)

Increased Efficiency increases E and lowers C. Can also reduce ACC, Installation Costs, Operating Costs To improve C For current single crystal or polycrystalline silicon technology Wafer costs account for ½ of the module cost. ½ is marketing, shipping, assembly etc. We can adresss technically only the efficiency E

Page 71: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

71

Solar Cell Module Efficiency

Optical Losses Due to Reflection

1)  Minimize surface contact area (increases series resistance)

2)  Antireflection coatings ¼ wave plate transparent coating of thickness d1 and refractive index n1 d1 = λ0/(4n1) n1 = sqrt(n0n2)

2) Surface Texturing Encourage light to bounce back into the cell.

3)  Absorption in rear cell contact. Desire reflection but at Random angle for internal reflection

Page 72: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

72

d1 = λ0/(4n1) n1 = sqrt(n0n2)

Page 73: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

73

Page 74: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

74

Dobrzanski, Drygala, Surface Texturing in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, J. Ach. In Mat. And Manuf. Eng. 31 77-82 (2008).

Page 75: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

75

Page 76: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

76

Reduce recombination at contacts by heavily doping near contacts

Page 77: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

77

Recombination Losses

Red

Blue

Page 78: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

78

Recombination Losses

Page 79: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

79

Recombination Losses

Page 80: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

80

Page 81: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

81

Page 82: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

82

Page 83: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

83

Bulk & Sheet Resistivity

Sheet Resistivity

Page 84: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

84

Eglash, Competition improves silicon-based solar cells, Photovoltaics December, 38-41 (2009).

Page 85: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

85

SunPower San Jose, CA 20% eficiency from Czochralski silicon

Page 86: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

86

Eglash, Competition improves silicon-based solar cells, Photovoltaics December, 38-41 (2009).

Page 87: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

87

Suntech, Wuxi, China multi crystalline cast silicon

Efficiency 16.5% Cost $1.50 per watt

Page 88: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

88

Eglash, Competition improves silicon-based solar cells, Photovoltaics December, 38-41 (2009).

Page 89: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

89

Page 90: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

90

Page 91: Solar Spectrum - University of Cincinnati

91