Soil Survey Report - Virginia Department of Transportation€¦ · Soil Survey Report 12/17/2012 12/11/2013 11/14/2014 Scott Lewis Alex Taloma Project: 0095-042-716 PPMS: 90347

Soil Survey Report 12/17/2012 12/11/2013 11/14/2014 Scott Lewis

Alex Taloma Project: 0095-042-716

PPMS: 90347

Alex.Taloma

pestamp

Table of Contents 1.0 Project Description................................................................................................................................ 0 2.0 Subsurface Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 0

2.1 Field Logs and Laboratory Testing ................................................................................................... 0 2.2 Existing Pavement Data .................................................................................................................... 2

3.0 Geotechnical Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Embankment ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Unsuitable Materials ......................................................................................................................... 3

STA 115+50 – 116+50 (Reloc. Ramp C) ........................................................................................... 3 STA 27+50 – 29+50 (Reloc. Air Park Rd) ......................................................................................... 3 STA 34+00 – 36+00 (Reloc. Air Park Rd) ......................................................................................... 3 STA 50+00 – 54+00 (Lewistown Rd, Widening Right of Constr BL)............................................... 3

3.3 Cuts ................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.4 Transitions......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.5 Slopes ................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.6 Drainage ............................................................................................................................................ 5

4.0 Pavement Recommendation.................................................................................................................. 6 4.1 Pavement Design .............................................................................................................................. 6

Ramp B (IS-95 SB On Ramp) - widening .......................................................................................... 6 Reloc. Ramp C (IS-95 NB Off Ramp) - mainline .............................................................................. 6 Ramp A (IS-95 SB Off Ramp) - widening ......................................................................................... 6 Ramp D ( IS-95 NB On Ramp) - widening ........................................................................................ 6 Reloc. Air Park Road (SR-809) - mainline ......................................................................................... 7 Lewistown Rd (SR-802) - widening ................................................................................................... 7 IS-95 NB and SB - shoulder ............................................................................................................... 7 Truck Turnaround on Lewistown Rd (SR-802) - mainline ................................................................ 8

4.2 Overlay Design ................................................................................................................................. 8 Ramp A (IS-95 SB Off Ramp)............................................................................................................ 8 Ramp B (IS-95 SB On Ramp) ............................................................................................................ 8 Ramp D ( IS-95 NB On Ramp)........................................................................................................... 8 Lewistown Rd (SR-802) ..................................................................................................................... 8

4.3 Temporary Pavement and Type A Pavement ................................................................................... 9 Ramp C (IS-95 NB Off Ramp) ........................................................................................................... 9 Variable alignments requiring Type A Pavement ............................................................................... 9 Lewistown Rd (SR-802) ..................................................................................................................... 9

4.4 Pavement Demolition........................................................................................................................ 9 Attachments .............................................................................................................................................. 10

1.0 Project Description The scope of the project is to replace the Lewistown Rd bridge over I-95, in turn requiring interchange improvement to accommodate the proposed bridge. 2.0 Subsurface Conditions The subsurface investigation consisted of four soil borings ranging at depths of 6.0 – 21.5 ft, pavement cores, and CBR sampling. Soil Unit 1 Topsoil/surficial material- the 0.5 ft soil unit was in a loose to dense, and low to high moisture condition. Soil Unit 2 Soils beneath the topsoil/surficial material classified as follows: SC, SM, CL, ML, CL-ML, and CH- the N-values ranged from weight of hammer (WH) to 51 blows per foot, and moisture content varied from relatively low to high moisture condition. 2.1 Field Logs and Laboratory Testing The table below displays condensed field and lab data. Table 1. Soil Data Station Offset

(feet) Depths (feet)

USCS LL (%)

PI (%)

Back-calculated CBR

Maximum Density (pcf)

Optimum Water Content (%)

f#200 passing (%)

27+00 RT 36.0

NA ML 16.5 2.5 8.8 118.0 13.3 64.3

37+00 RT 55.0

2.0 – 13.0

ML NA NP 9.2 122.7 10.3 52.6

33+00 LT 18.0

1.0 – 7.0

SC 27.3 11.3 9.0 123.8 9.5 46.1

37+75 RT 27.0

17.0 – 23.0

CL 36.4 21.0 11.6 120.2 13.0 58.4

49+00 LT 21.0

NA CL 31.5 17.2 NA NA NA 59.9

37+75 LT 27.0

NA SM NA NP NA NA NA 38.8

118+33 LT 105.0

2.0 – 4.0

CL 34.7 17.2 NA NA NA 68.9

118+33 LT 105.0

4.0 – 10.0

CL-ML

20.8 5.6 NA NA NA 65.4

118+33 LT 105.0

10.0 – 14.0

CL 41.9 21.1 NA NA NA 71.8

2

118+33 LT 105.0

14.0 – 20.0

SC 27.9 9.8 NA NA NA 16.8

119+62 LT 90.0

0.0 – 6.0

CL 31.3 14.2 NA NA NA 71.8

119+62 LT 90.0

6.0 – 12.0

CL 24.5 7.7 NA NA NA 53.9

119+62 LT 90.0

12.0 – 16.0

CL 40.3 20.7 NA NA NA 53.4

119+62 LT 90.0

16.0 – 20.0

CH 66.6 39.9 NA NA NA 91.9

46+00 LT 30.0

5.0 – 14.5

CL 32.7 15.8 7.1 118.4 12.7 56.6

36+81 LT 67.0

0.0 – 4.0

SC 45.4 25.1 NA NA NA 27.7

36+81 LT 67.0

4.0 – 8.0

CH 58.1 38.0 NA NA NA 78.4

36+81 LT 67.0

8.0 – 16.0

SM NA NP NA NA NA 26.5

2.2 Existing Pavement Data The existing pavement data was based on field cores and proposed pavement placed during VDOT project 0095-042-116. The following table displays pavement alignment with respect to thickness. Table 2. Pavement Structure

Alignment AC

thickness, in

Concrete thickness,

in SR 802 10.5 NA Ramp A & B 9.5 NA Ramp C & D 12 NA IS 95 shoulder, NB & SB 10 NA IS 95 mainline, NB & SB 8.0 9.0

Assume 8.0 inches dense graded aggregate beneath existing pavement structures excluding IS 95 mainline, the dense graded aggregate is noted to be 6.0 inches.

3

3.0 Geotechnical Recommendations Recommendations presented in this report are based on field conditions presented in Section 2.0. Seasonal weather and/or storm events may govern field conditions to differ from Section 2.0. Ultimately, field conditions should be evaluated by field/project engineer during construction. Additionally, borings presented in Section 2.0 may not capture entire strata that may be encountered. 3.1 Embankment Utilize CBR 10 material for borrow excavation. Additionally, on site material if moisture conditioned, may be suitable for embankment construction. Recommend 6.0 inch depth for clearing and grubbing for estimating purposes. Recommend apply 18.0 % shrinkage value for cut to fill quantities for estimation purposes. 3.2 Unsuitable Materials The project conditions documented at the time of field testing (low N-values ranging from WH to 10 bpf) along with lab testing demonstrate unsuitable material to be addressed at the following sections:

STA 115+50 – 116+50 (Reloc. Ramp C) 1) Place subgrade/embankment stabilization geosynthetic within fill limits after clearing and

grubbing. {the geosynthetic will be placed toe to toe at an elevation coinciding with the subgrade and subbase interface}

STA 27+50 – 29+50 (Reloc. Air Park Rd) 1) Undercut maximum 1.0 ft below proposed subgrade elevation, horizontal limits coinciding with

proposed fill limits 2) Place 1.0 ft borrow excavation within excavated prism

STA 34+00 – 36+00 (Reloc. Air Park Rd) 1) Undercut maximum 2.0 ft below proposed subgrade elevation, horizontal limits coinciding with

proposed subbase limits 2) Place 2.0 ft of VDOT #3 stone wrapped in subgrade stabilization geosynthetic within excavated

prism

STA 50+00 – 54+00 (Lewistown Rd, Widening Right of Constr BL) 1) Undercut maximum 2.0 ft below proposed subgrade elevation, horizontal limits coinciding with

proposed subbase limits 2) Place 2.0 ft of VDOT #3 stone wrapped in subgrade stabilization geosynthetic within excavated

prism

4

3.3 Cuts The project does not exhibit problematic cut sections requiring stabilization. 3.4 Transitions The project does not exhibit cut to fill transitions of significant magnitude requiring stabilization. 3.5 Slopes Recommend 2:1 slopes.

5

3.6 Drainage pH and resistivity results are available in the Appendix for determination of drainage element selection, with respect to acceptable materials. The table below presents drainage structure installation recommendations:

Structure INV EL Dense/Firm

EL Recommendation 4C-02 192.525 192,192 No unsuitables encountered 12-04 179.325 177 Undercut and replace with 1.5 ft #57 stone capped with 6.0 in bedding material 12-05 178.1 177 Undercut and replace with 0.5 ft #57 stone capped with 6.0 in bedding material 13-05 186.915 185 Undercut and replace with 1.5 ft #57 stone capped with 6.0 in bedding material

Structure 4C-02 will be installed under I-95, recommend remove pavement; assume existing pavement consists of 8.0 in of asphalt concrete, 9.0 in of hydraulic cement concrete, and 6.0 in of dense graded aggregate for estimating purposes. Recommend replace with I-95 pavement design presented in Section 4.0 Pavement Recommendation. The undercut and replacement prism horizontal limits are to coincide with PB-1 installation of box culverts bedding and backfill – method A.

6

4.0 Pavement Recommendation The pavement was analyzed using 1993 AASHTO pavement design software called Darwin Pavement Design System. Traffic data for analysis was provided by Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson in the IMR I-95/Lewistown Road Interchange. 4.1 Pavement Design

Ramp B (IS-95 SB On Ramp) - widening

Reloc. Ramp C (IS-95 NB Off Ramp) - mainline Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:

Thickness Pavement Structure Application Rate 2.0” SM-12.5E 220 lbs/yd2

4.0” IM-19.0E 220 lbs/yd2 X two lifts

4.0” BM-25.0D 440 lbs/yd2

12.0” 21B-Aggregate Recommend widening per WP-2 when widening finished grade comparable to existing grade.

Ramp A (IS-95 SB Off Ramp) - widening

Ramp D ( IS-95 NB On Ramp) - widening Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:


2.0” IM-19.0E 220 lbs/yd2

4.0” BM-25.0D 440 lbs/yd2

12.0” 21B-Aggregate Recommend widening per WP-2 when widening finished grade comparable to existing grade.

7

Reloc. Air Park Road (SR-809) - mainline Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:

Thickness Pavement Structure Application Rate 1.5” SM-12.5D* 165 lbs/yd2

2.0” IM-19.0D 220 lbs/yd2

3.5” BM-25.0D 385 lbs/yd2

6.0” 21B-Aggregate * - E binder may be substituted for bidding efficiency

Lewistown Rd (SR-802) - widening Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:


2.0” IM-19.0D 220 lbs/yd2

3.5” BM-25.0D 385 lbs/yd2

12.0” 21B-Aggregate Recommend widening per WP-2 when widening finished grade comparable to existing grade. Recommend UD-4 or daylight subbase as needed.

IS-95 NB and SB - shoulder Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:


4.0” IM-19.0E 440 lbs/yd2

4.0” BM-25.0D 440 lbs/yd2 12.0” 21B-Aggregate

Recommend saw cut for widening at longitudinal joint between mainline and shoulder interface. Recommend crack seal type A for longitudinal joint between proposed AC and existing pavement along I-95 median.

8

Truck Turnaround on Lewistown Rd (SR-802) - mainline Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:

Thickness Pavement Structure Application Rate 2.0” SM-12.5S 220 lbs/yd2

3.0” IM-19.0S 330 lbs/yd2

4.0” BM-25.0S 440 lbs/yd2

12.0” 21B-Aggregate Recommend UD-4 beneath proposed subbase prism, dense graded aggregate No. 21B or day light No. 21B to face of proposed slope face for all full depth pavement structures placed. 4.2 Overlay Design

Ramp A (IS-95 SB Off Ramp)

Ramp B (IS-95 SB On Ramp)

Ramp D ( IS-95 NB On Ramp)

Lewistown Rd (SR-802) The proposed typical sections shows plane, overlay, and/or buildup of existing pavement to enhance geometrics, recommend a variable mill depth of 0.0 – 2.0 inches and place the following minimum layer:


Recommend the following layers for buildup sections:

Thickness Pavement Structure Application Rate 1.5 – 2.0” SM-12.5E 165 – 220 lbs/yd2

2.0 – 3.0” IM-19.0* 220 – 330 lbs/yd2

2.5 – 4.0” BM-25.0D 275 – 440 lbs/yd2

* - Use E binder for ramp buildups, use D binder for Lewistown Rd buildups.

9

4.3 Temporary Pavement and Type A Pavement

Ramp C (IS-95 NB Off Ramp, Temporary Pavement)

Variable alignments requiring Type A Pavement Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:

Thickness Pavement Structure Application Rate 2.0” IM-19.0D 220 lbs/yd2

4.0” BM-25.0D 440 lbs/yd2

12.0” 21B-Aggregate

Lewistown Rd (SR-802) Recommend the following pavement layers for proposed typical at the routes referenced above:

Thickness Pavement Structure Application Rate 2.0” IM-19.0D 220 lbs/yd2

3.0” BM-25.0D 330 lbs/yd2

12.0” 21B-Aggregate 4.4 Pavement Demolition Recommend pavement demolition coincide with depths presented in Section 2.2 Existing Pavement Data.

10

Attachments

1993 AASHTO Pavement Design

DARWin(tm) Pavement Design System

A Proprietary AASHTOWARE(tm)Computer Software Product

Flexible Structural Design Module

0095-042-716Air Park Rd

Des. Mr = 12120

Flexible Structural Design Module Data

18-kip ESALs Over Initial Performance Period: 2,702,317

Initial Serviceability: 4.2Terminal Serviceability: 2.8

Reliability Level (%): 90Overall Standard Deviation: .49

Roadbed Soil Resilient Modulus (PSI): 12,120Stage Construction: 1

Calculated Design Structural Number: 3.62

Specified Layer Design

Struct. Drain.Coef. Coef. Thickness Width Calculated

Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-12.5D .44 1 1.5 - .662 IM-19.0D .44 1 2 - .883 BM-25.0D .44 1 3.5 - 1.544 21B-Aggregate .12 1 6 - .72

Total - - - 13.00 - 3.80

Rigorous ESAL Calculation

Performance Period (years): 20Two-Way Daily Traffic (ADT): 5,300

Number of Lanes In Design Direction: 1Percent of All Trucks In Design Lane (%): 100

Percent Trucks In Design Direction (%): 50Growth: Compound

Percent Annual Average Initial Truck Annual % Growth Accumulated 18K ESALsClass of ADT % Growth Factor (ESALs/truck) in Truck Factor over Performance Period

1 86.3 3 .0002 0 4,4892 6.8 3 .46 0 813,5363 6.9 3 1.05 0 1,884,292

Total 100.00 - - - 2,702,317

Page 1





0095-042-716Des. MR = 12120

95 Mainline Exist AC = 10.3"+ CONC = 9.0"



Initial Serviceability: 4.2Terminal Serviceability: 3






Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SMA-12.5(76-22) .44 1 2 - .882 SMA-19.0(76-22) .44 1 4 - 1.763 BM-25.0D .44 1 8 - 3.524 21B-Aggregate .12 1 10 - 1.20

Total - - - 24.00 - 7.36






1 85 3 .0002 0 126,3462 2 3 .46 0 6,837,5403 13 3 1.05 0 101,448,287

Total 100.00 - - - 108,412,173

Page 1





0095-042-716RTE 802 <turnaround>

Des. Mr = 12120Exist AC = 6.8"









Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-12.5S .44 1 2 - .882 IM-19.0S .44 1 3 - 1.323 BM-25.0S .44 1 4 - 1.764 21B-Aggregate .12 1 12 - 1.44

Total - - - 21.00 - 5.40






1 82 3 .0002 0 10,5022 3 3 .46 0 883,7383 15 3 1.05 0 10,086,141

Total 100.00 - - - 10,980,381

Page 1





0095-042-716RTE 802










Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-12.5D .44 1 2 - .882 IM-19.0D .44 1 2 - .883 BM-25.0A .44 1 3.5 - 1.544 21B-Aggregate .12 1 12 - 1.44

Total - - - 19.50 - 4.74






1 87 3 .0002 0 11,1432 3 3 .46 0 883,7383 10 3 1.05 0 6,724,094

Total 100.00 - - - 7,618,975

Page 1





0095-042-716Ramp A/D

ADT(2016 ALT B)=6700Des. Mr = 12120









Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-9.5E .44 1 2 - .882 IM-19.0D .44 1 2 - .883 BM-25.0D .44 1 4 - 1.764 21B-Aggregate .12 1 12 - 1.44

Total - - - 20.00 - 4.96






1 85 3 .0002 0 7,3852 2 3 .46 0 399,6693 13 3 1.05 0 5,929,874

Total 100.00 - - - 6,336,929

Page 1





0095-042-716Ramp B/C

ADT(2016 ALT B)=6700Des. Mr = 12120









Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-9.5E .44 1 2 - .882 IM-19.0D .44 1 4 - 1.763 BM-25.0D .44 1 4 - 1.764 21B-Aggregate .12 1 12 - 1.44

Total - - - 22.00 - 5.84






1 85 3 .0002 0 22,7462 2 3 .46 0 1,230,9813 13 3 1.05 0 18,264,012

Total 100.00 - - - 19,517,740

Page 1





0095-042-716RTE 802 <temp. pavement>










Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-12.5D .44 1 0 - .002 IM-19.0D .44 1 2 - .883 BM-25.0A .44 1 3 - 1.324 21B-Aggregate .12 1 12 - 1.44

Total - - - 17.00 - 3.64






1 87 3 .0002 0 1,7352 3 3 .46 0 137,5953 10 3 1.05 0 1,046,919

Total 100.00 - - - 1,186,249

Page 1





0095-042-716Ramp B <temp. pavement>

ADT(2016 ALT B)=7700Des. Mr = 12120









Layer Material Description (Ai) (Mi) (Di) (in) (ft) SN1 SM-9.5E .44 1 0 - .002 IM-19.0D .44 1 2 - .883 BM-25.0D .44 1 4 - 1.764 21B-Aggregate .12 1 12 - 1.44

Total - - - 18.00 - 4.08






1 85 3 .0002 0 2,0002 2 3 .46 0 108,2483 13 3 1.05 0 1,606,078

Total 100.00 - - - 1,716,326

Page 1

Class % of ADT % Growth ESALS/Truck

1 86.3 3 0.0002

2 6.8 3 0.46

3 6.9 3 1.05

100

Growth Rate (Provided)

4.2

2.8

90

Accum 18K ESALs over Perf Per 67,560

Intial Serviceability

Terminal Serviceability

Reliability Level (%)


Performance Period

Initial Year ADT

% All Trucks in Design Lane

% All Trucks in Design Direction

4

5300

100

50

3

Accum. 18K ESALs over Perf. Period

67,560



DARWin™ Pavement DesignFlexible Structural Design Module

0095-042-716 *Air Park Rd*

**Shoulder Pavement**

Layer Str. Coef. Thick. Width Calc. SN

1 0.44 1.5 12 0.66

2 0.44 2 12 0.88

3 0.44 0 12 0.00

4 0.12 10 12 1.20

0 0 0 0 0.00

Total 13.5 2.74

Drainage Coefficient = 1.0

21B-Aggregate

0


Mat'l Description

SM-12.5D

IM-19.0D

BM-25.0D

Roadbed Soil Reilient Modulus

Calculated Design Structural No

90

0.49

12120

1.89


Overall Standard Deviation

Class % of ADT % Growth ESALS/Truck

1 86.3 3 0.0002

2 6.8 3 0.46

3 6.9 3 1.05

100

Growth Rate (Provided)

4.2

2.8

90

Accum 18K ESALs over Perf Per 420,454

Intial Serviceability

Terminal Serviceability



Performance Period

Initial Year ADT

% All Trucks in Design Lane

% All Trucks in Design Direction

4

5300

100

50

3

Accum. 18K ESALs over Perf. Period

420,454



DARWin™ Pavement DesignFlexible Structural Design Module

0095-042-716 *Air Park Rd*

**Shoulder/Temporary Pavement**

Layer Str. Coef. Thick. Width Calc. SN

0 0.44 0 12 0.00

1 0.44 4 12 1.76

0 0.44 0 12 0.00

2 0.12 8 12 0.96

0 0 0 0 0.00

Total 12 2.72

Drainage Coefficient = 1.0

21B-Aggregate

0


Mat'l Description

SM-12.5D

IM-19.0D

BM-25.0D

Roadbed Soil Reilient Modulus

Calculated Design Structural No

90

0.49

12120

2.60


Overall Standard Deviation

Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010

Soil Sample ReportMaterials Division

Project No. : Report No. :

UPC No. : Sample No. :

Route No. : Submitted By :

For Use In : At :

Date of Report: 8/28/2012

Tests :

USCS (ASTM) Soil Classification (h):

Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-4 (0)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 2.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 6.0 0.1% 99.9%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 7.0 0.1% 99.7%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.8% 98.9%

0.850mm

(#20) 1.1 0.8% 99.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 3.8% 95.1%

0.425mm

(#40) 5.2 3.9% 95.3%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 7.8% 87.3%

0.250mm

(#60) 10.5 7.8% 87.5%

54-104-120095-042-716,RW201, C501

802 (Lewistown Rd.)

Scott Lewis

Embankments

Mechanical Analysis of Total Sample (e) Mechanical Analysis of -#10 Sieve (e)

Sandy SILT (ML)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)

Physical Characteristics of Soil

Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

16.5%

14.0%

2.5%

T87 T88 T89 T90 T99 D2487

Optimum Water Content (a)

Total Soil N/A

13.3%(#60) 0.0 7.8% 87.3% (#60) 10.5 7.8% 87.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 8.1% 79.2%

0.180mm

(#80) 10.9 8.1% 79.5%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.9% 75.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 5.3 3.9% 75.5%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 11.0% 64.3%0.075mm

(#200) 14.9 11.1% 64.5%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 64.3% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 64.5%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion

Total 5679.0 Total 134.8

23 30.56

31.77 40.76

50.87 39.51

48.14 1.25

2.73 8.95

16.37 14.0%

16.7%

16.5%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :

Reported By : Paul Baldwin for John Schuler, PE, For : Andy Babish, PE Geotechnical Program Manager State Materials Engineer

Test procedures include: a=T99 (VTM 1), b=T89 (VTM 7), c=T90 (VTM 7), d=T193 (VTM 8), e=T88, f=M145, g=T265 & h= D2488 (D2487). Page 1 of 2

Sample drawn on 8/13/12 and packed in a canvas bag. Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

Sampled from theWater Content:

VDOT

(Hanover County) 36 feet right of station 27+00

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:

Weight of Dish + Wet Soil:

Weight of Water:Weight of Dish + Dry Soil:

N/A

% Swell After Soaking

Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value

Weight of Dish + Dry Soil:


118

Total Soil

-4 Portion

Maximum Density (lbs./cu. ft.) (a)

"

Report No. : 54-104-12

109.0

109.5

110.0

110.5

111.0

111.5

112.0

112.5

113.0

113.5

114.0

114.5

115.0

115.5

116.0

116.5

117.0

117.5

118.0

118.5

9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0%

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH

CBR Stress-Strain Graph

Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)

Penetration (Inches)


Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-4

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 2.0 0.1% 99.9%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 16.0 0.6% 99.3%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 1.3% 98.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 1.8 1.3% 98.7%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 3.4% 94.6%

0.425mm

(#40) 4.8 3.4% 95.3%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 6.4% 88.3%

0.250mm

(#60) 9.1 6.4% 88.9%

T87 T88 T89 T99 D2487


Total Soil N/A

10.3%

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

N/A

Non-Plastic

Non-Plastic

Sandy SILT (ML)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


54-105-120095-042-716

2

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 6.4% 88.3% (#60) 9.1 6.4% 88.9%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 7.6% 80.7%

0.180mm

(#80) 10.8 7.6% 81.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 4.4% 76.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 6.3 4.4% 76.9%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 23.7% 52.6%0.075mm

(#200) 33.9 23.9% 53.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 52.6% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 53.0%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 Non-Plastic

0

N/A

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



122.7

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A


station 37+00

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:

Liquid Limit could not be determined due to sample sliding in test cup. Sample drawn on 8/14/12 and packed in a canvas bag. Tests

performed at Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

2' - 13'


"

Report No. : 54-105-12

116.0

117.0

118.0

119.0

120.0

121.0

122.0

123.0

7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0%

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-6 (2)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 12.0 0.3% 99.7%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 76.0 1.8% 97.9%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 5.9% 92.1%

0.850mm

(#20) 9.1 6.0% 94.0%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 12.9% 79.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 20.0 13.2% 80.8%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 13.5% 65.7%

0.250mm

(#60) 20.9 13.8% 67.1%

T87 T88 T89 T90 T99 D2487


Total Soil N/A

9.5%

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

27.3%

16.0%

11.3%

Clayey SAND (SC)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


Road Building, Embankments

54-106-120095-042-716,PE101,RW201,C501

RM-1

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 13.5% 65.7% (#60) 20.9 13.8% 67.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 7.9% 57.8%

0.180mm

(#80) 12.2 8.0% 59.0%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.2% 54.6%

0.150mm

(#100) 5.0 3.3% 55.7%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 8.5% 46.1%0.075mm

(#200) 13.1 8.6% 47.1%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 46.1% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 47.1%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


25 30.56

34.37 39.06

55.9 37.89

51.28 1.17

4.62 7.33

16.91 16.0%

27.3%

27.3%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



123.8

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A


18' left of station 33+00 (Hanover County)

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:

(UPC 90347). Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab. Sample drawn on 8/22/12 and packed in a canvas bag.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

1' - 7'


"

Report No. : 54-106-12

116.0

117.0

118.0

119.0

120.0

121.0

122.0

123.0

124.0

125.0

7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0%

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-6 (9)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 7.0 0.2% 99.8%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 47.0 1.1% 98.7%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 1.7% 97.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 2.1 1.7% 98.3%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 4.8% 92.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 5.9 4.9% 93.4%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 8.6% 83.6%

0.250mm

(#60) 10.5 8.7% 84.6%

T87 T88 T89 T90 T99 D2487


Total Soil N/A

13.0%

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

36.4%

15.4%

21.0%

Sandy lean CLAY (CL)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


Approval Fill, Embankments

54-107-120095-042-716-PE101,RW201,C501

802 Lewistown Rd.

RM-2

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 8.6% 83.6% (#60) 10.5 8.7% 84.6%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 8.3% 75.3%

0.180mm

(#80) 10.1 8.4% 76.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.9% 71.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 4.8 4.0% 72.3%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 12.9% 58.4%0.075mm

(#200) 15.8 13.1% 59.2%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 58.4% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 59.2%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


23 31.64

34.32 39.89

52.05 38.79

47.28 1.10

4.77 7.15

12.96 15.4%

36.8%

36.4%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



120.2

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A


(Hanover County) 27' right of station 37+75

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:

(UPC 90347). Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab. Sample drawn on 8/22/12 and packed in a canvas bag.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

17' - 23'


"

Report No. : 54-107-12

104.0

106.0

108.0

110.0

112.0

114.0

116.0

118.0

120.0

122.0

6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0%

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-6 (7)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 1.7% 98.3%

0.850mm

(#20) 3.4 1.7% 98.3%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 4.7% 93.7%

0.425mm

(#40) 9.6 4.7% 93.7%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 7.6% 86.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 15.6 7.6% 86.1%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

31.5%

14.3%

17.2%


Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


54-108-120095-042-716

95

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 7.6% 86.1% (#60) 15.6 7.6% 86.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 7.2% 78.9%

0.180mm

(#80) 14.9 7.2% 78.9%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.5% 75.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 7.3 3.5% 75.3%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 15.4% 59.9%0.075mm

(#200) 31.8 15.4% 59.9%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 59.9% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 59.9%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


28 34.58

34.11 44.35

53.61 43.13

48.99 1.22

4.62 8.55

14.88 14.3%

31.0%

31.5%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A


21 feet left of station 49+00

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:

Sample drawn on 8/29/12 and packed in a car. Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:


"

Report No. : 54-108-12

0.0

0.3

0.5

0.8

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-4

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.1% 99.9%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.1 0.1% 99.9%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 0.6% 99.3%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.4 0.6% 99.3%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 2.4% 96.9%

0.250mm

(#60) 1.5 2.4% 96.9%

54-109-120095-042-716

95

Scott Lewis


Silty SAND (SM)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

N/A

Non-Plastic

Non-Plastic

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 2.4% 96.9% (#60) 1.5 2.4% 96.9%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 3.5% 93.4%

0.180mm

(#80) 2.2 3.5% 93.4%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.0% 90.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 1.9 3.0% 90.3%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 51.5% 38.8%0.075mm

(#200) 32.2 51.5% 38.8%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 38.8% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 38.8%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 Non-Plastic

0

N/A

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



Liquid Limit could not be determined due to sample sliding in testing cup. Sample drawn on 8/29/12 and packed in a car. Tests performed at

Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-109-12

0.0

0.3

0.5

0.8

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-6 (10)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.7% 99.3%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.9 0.7% 99.3%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 2.3% 97.0%

0.425mm

(#40) 3.2 2.3% 97.0%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 4.9% 92.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 6.7 4.9% 92.1%

54-110-120095-042-716

95

Scott Lewis



Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

34.7%

17.5%

17.2%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 4.9% 92.1% (#60) 6.7 4.9% 92.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 5.6% 86.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 7.7 5.6% 86.5%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.0% 83.5%

0.150mm

(#100) 4.1 3.0% 83.5%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 14.5% 68.9%0.075mm

(#200) 19.9 14.5% 68.9%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 68.9% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 68.9%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


22 32.61

30.55 40.60

45.75 39.41

41.79 1.19

3.96 6.80

11.24 17.5%

35.2%

34.7%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



Sample drawn on 8/29/12 and packed in a glass jar. Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

2 - 4 Feet



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-110-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-4 (1)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.5% 99.5%

0.850mm

(#20) 1.1 0.5% 99.5%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 2.3% 97.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 4.9 2.3% 97.2%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 5.1% 92.0%

0.250mm

(#60) 10.9 5.1% 92.0%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

20.8%

15.2%

5.6%

Sandy silty CLAY (CL-ML)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


54-111-120095-042-716

95

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 5.1% 92.0% (#60) 10.9 5.1% 92.0%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 6.6% 85.4%

0.180mm

(#80) 14.1 6.6% 85.4%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.6% 81.8%

0.150mm

(#100) 7.7 3.6% 81.8%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 16.4% 65.4%0.075mm

(#200) 34.8 16.4% 65.4%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 65.4% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 65.4%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


25 30.60

34.36 39.64

47.91 38.45

45.58 1.19

2.33 7.85

11.22 15.2%

20.8%

20.8%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:


Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

4 - 10 Feet


"

Report No. : 54-111-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-7-6 (14)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.9% 99.1%

0.850mm

(#20) 1.1 0.9% 99.1%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 2.0% 97.1%

0.425mm

(#40) 2.6 2.0% 97.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 4.0% 93.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 5.2 4.0% 93.1%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

41.9%

20.8%

21.1%

Lean CLAY with sand (CL)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


54-112-120095-042-716

95

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 4.0% 93.1% (#60) 5.2 4.0% 93.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 5.3% 87.9%

0.180mm

(#80) 6.8 5.3% 87.9%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 2.9% 84.9%

0.150mm

(#100) 3.8 2.9% 84.9%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 13.1% 71.8%0.075mm

(#200) 17.0 13.1% 71.8%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 71.8% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 71.8%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


22 32.61

31.75 41.04

47.7 39.59

42.94 1.45

4.76 6.98

11.19 20.8%

42.5%

41.9%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:


Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

10 - 14 Feet


"

Report No. : 54-112-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-2-4 (0)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 24.0 2.0% 98.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 136.0 11.4% 86.6%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 153.0 12.9% 73.7%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 11.8% 61.9%

0.850mm

(#20) 33.4 16.0% 84.0%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 20.2% 41.7%

0.425mm

(#40) 57.3 27.4% 56.6%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 17.7% 24.0%

0.250mm

(#60) 50.2 24.0% 32.5%

54-113-120095-042-716

95

Scott Lewis


Clayey SAND (SC)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

27.9%

18.1%

9.8%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 17.7% 24.0% (#60) 50.2 24.0% 32.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 3.9% 20.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 11.0 5.3% 27.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 1.0% 19.1%

0.150mm

(#100) 2.8 1.3% 25.9%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 2.3% 16.8%0.075mm

(#200) 6.5 3.1% 22.8%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 16.8% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 22.8%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


25 31.30

30.56 39.78

50.02 38.48

45.77 1.30

4.25 7.18

15.21 18.1%

27.9%

27.9%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :




Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

14 - 20 Feet



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-113-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST

Date of Report: 9/5/2012 Submitted By : Scott Lewis

Project Number : 0095-042-716 Sample Number : 1

County : Hanover For Use In : Fill & Embankments

Central Office Report Number : 54-114-12 pH : 4.6

Location : 90' left of sta. 119+62 Remarks : T288 performed at Elko Sloils Lab.

T289 performed at Elko Chemistry Lab.

UPC : Depth: 0.2' - 7'

Box Constant = 6.643 cm

Meter Readings Resistivity

(ohms) (ohm-cm)

24000 159432

7300 48494

5400 35872

4600 30558

4000 26572

3600 23915

3600 23915

0

0

0

Minimum Resistivity = 23915 ohm-cm

Reported By: Paul Baldwin for John Schuler, PE For: Andy Babish, PE

Geotechnical Program Manager State Materials Engineer

Form Revised: 5/27/10

Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-6 (8)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.5% 99.5%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.9 0.5% 99.5%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 2.3% 97.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 4.4 2.3% 97.2%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 4.6% 92.6%

0.250mm

(#60) 8.9 4.6% 92.6%

54-115-120095-042-716

95

1 - 3

S. Lewis

SWMB


Lean CLAY with sand (CL)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

31.3%

17.1%

14.2%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 4.6% 92.6% (#60) 8.9 4.6% 92.6%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 5.5% 87.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 10.6 5.5% 87.1%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 3.1% 84.0%

0.150mm

(#100) 5.9 3.1% 84.0%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 12.2% 71.8%0.075mm

(#200) 23.3 12.2% 71.8%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 71.8% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 71.8%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


22 34.57

32.7 42.71

50.22 41.52

45.99 1.19

4.23 6.95

13.29 17.1%

31.8%

31.3%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



Sample drawn on 9/5/12 and packed in a jar. Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

0' - 6'


90 Feet left of station 119+62

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-115-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-4 (1)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.4% 99.6%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.8 0.4% 99.6%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 2.5% 97.1%

0.425mm

(#40) 4.8 2.5% 97.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 6.6% 90.5%

0.250mm

(#60) 12.6 6.6% 90.5%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

24.5%

16.8%

7.7%


Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


SWMB

54-116-120095-042-716

95

4 - 6

S. Lewis

(#60) 0.0 6.6% 90.5% (#60) 12.6 6.6% 90.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 8.4% 82.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 16.1 8.4% 82.1%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 4.7% 77.4%

0.150mm

(#100) 9.0 4.7% 77.4%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 23.6% 53.9%0.075mm

(#200) 45.2 23.6% 53.9%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 53.9% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 53.9%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


25 31.63

30.53 40.46

45.81 39.19

42.8 1.27

3.01 7.56

12.27 16.8%

24.5%

24.5%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:


Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

6' - 12'


"

Report No. : 54-116-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-7-6 (8)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.3% 99.7%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.4 0.3% 99.7%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 2.5% 97.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 3.7 2.5% 97.2%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 10.1% 87.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 14.9 10.1% 87.1%

54-117-120095-042-716

95

7 & 8

S. Lewis

SWMB


Sandy Lean CLAY (CL)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

40.3%

19.6%

20.7%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 10.1% 87.1% (#60) 14.9 10.1% 87.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 12.5% 74.6%

0.180mm

(#80) 18.3 12.5% 74.6%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 5.7% 69.0%

0.150mm

(#100) 8.3 5.7% 69.0%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 15.5% 53.4%0.075mm

(#200) 22.8 15.5% 53.4%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 53.4% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 53.4%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


28 31.54

30.6 39.54

46.32 38.23

41.85 1.31

4.47 6.69

11.25 19.6%

39.7%

40.3%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :




Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

12' - 16'



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-117-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-7-6 (42)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.5% 99.5%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.9 0.5% 99.5%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 1.3% 98.2%

0.425mm

(#40) 2.4 1.3% 98.2%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 1.7% 96.5%

0.250mm

(#60) 3.2 1.7% 96.5%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

66.6%

26.7%

39.9%

Fat CLAY (CH)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


SWMB

54-118-120095-042-716

95

9 & 10

S. Lewis

(#60) 0.0 1.7% 96.5% (#60) 3.2 1.7% 96.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 1.7% 94.7%

0.180mm

(#80) 3.2 1.7% 94.7%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 0.8% 94.0%

0.150mm

(#100) 1.4 0.8% 94.0%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 2.0% 91.9%0.075mm

(#200) 3.7 2.0% 91.9%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 91.9% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 91.9%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


26 31.76

31.31 40.68

47.44 38.80

41.01 1.88

6.43 7.04

9.7 26.7%

66.3%

66.6%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:


Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

16' - 20'


"

Report No. : 54-118-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0.06 2.06 4.06 6.06 8.06 10.06 12.06 14.06 16.06 18.06 20.06

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-6 (6)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 4.0 0.1% 99.9%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.5% 99.5%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.7 0.5% 99.5%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 4.0% 95.5%

0.425mm

(#40) 6.0 4.0% 95.6%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 9.7% 85.8%

0.250mm

(#60) 14.6 9.7% 85.9%

54-119-120095-042-716

Scott Lewis

Embankments



Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

32.7%

16.9%

15.8%

T87 T88 T89 T90 T99 D2487


Total Soil N/A

12.7%(#60) 0.0 9.7% 85.8% (#60) 14.6 9.7% 85.9%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 10.4% 75.4%

0.180mm

(#80) 15.7 10.4% 75.4%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 4.7% 70.7%

0.150mm

(#100) 7.1 4.7% 70.7%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 14.1% 56.6%0.075mm

(#200) 21.3 14.1% 56.6%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 56.6% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 56.6%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


22 31.63

32.61 41.25

49.93 39.86

45.61 1.39

4.32 8.23

13 16.9%

33.2%

32.7%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



Sample drawn on 9/17/12 and packed in a canvas bag. Tests performed at Elko Soils Lab.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

5' - 14.5'


30' left of station 46+00

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



118.4

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-119-12

110.0

111.0

112.0

113.0

114.0

115.0

116.0

117.0

118.0

119.0

9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0%

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST

Date of Report: 10/1/2012 Submitted By : Scott Lewis

Project Number : 0095-042-716 Sample Number :

County : Hanover County For Use In : SWMB - Airport Road

Central Office Report Number : 54-120-12 pH : 4.9

Location : 78 ft left of station 37+89 Remarks : T288 performed at Elko Sloils Lab.

T289 performed at Elko Chemistry Lab.

UPC : 2103 Depth: 0' - 6'

Box Constant = 6.643 cm

Meter Readings Resistivity

(ohms) (ohm-cm)

11000 73073

4300 28565

3400 22586

2900 19265

2400 15943

2200 14615

0

0

0

0

Minimum Resistivity = 14615 ohm-cm

Reported By: Paul Baldwin for John Schuler, PE For: Andy Babish, PE

Geotechnical Program Manager State Materials Engineer

Form Revised: 5/27/10

Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-2-7 (0)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 5.0 0.7% 99.3%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 39.0 5.7% 93.5%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 11.5% 82.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 19.5 12.3% 87.7%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 19.7% 62.3%

0.425mm

(#40) 33.4 21.1% 66.6%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 16.1% 46.2%

0.250mm

(#60) 27.3 17.2% 49.4%

54-125-120095-042-716

Scott Lewis

SWMB


Clayey SAND (SC)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

45.4%

20.3%

25.1%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 16.1% 46.2% (#60) 27.3 17.2% 49.4%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 9.3% 36.9%

0.180mm

(#80) 15.8 10.0% 39.5%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 2.9% 34.0%

0.150mm

(#100) 5.0 3.2% 36.3%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 6.3% 27.7%0.075mm

(#200) 10.6 6.7% 29.6%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 27.7% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 29.6%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


27 31.64

34.55 40.64

52.56 39.12

46.97 1.52

5.59 7.48

12.42 20.3%

45.0%

45.4%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :




Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

0' - 4'


67 feet left of station 36+81 Hanover County

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-125-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-7-6 (30)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 2.0 0.4% 99.6%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 0.2% 99.4%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.2 0.2% 99.8%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 0.6% 98.8%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.8 0.6% 99.2%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 2.7% 96.1%

0.250mm

(#60) 3.4 2.7% 96.5%

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

58.1%

20.1%

38.0%

Sandy fat CLAY (CH)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion


SWMB

54-126-120095-042-716

Scott Lewis

(#60) 0.0 2.7% 96.1% (#60) 3.4 2.7% 96.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 4.0% 92.1%

0.180mm

(#80) 5.0 4.0% 92.5%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 2.8% 89.3%

0.150mm

(#100) 3.5 2.8% 89.7%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 10.9% 78.4%0.075mm

(#200) 13.7 11.0% 78.7%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 78.4% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 78.7%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


24 31.76

34.57 39.81

52.79 38.46

46.07 1.35

6.72 6.70

11.5 20.1%

58.4%

58.1%

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:



N/A


67 feet left of station 36+81 Hanover County

Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:


Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

4' - 8'


"

Report No. : 54-126-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



Form TL-32A (5/31/2005)

Revised: 5/27/2010





For Use In : At :


Tests :


Sieve SizesGrams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

Sieve

Sizes

Grams

Retained

Percent

Retained

Percent

Passing

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

>63.00mm

(+2 1/2 in.)

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

63.00mm

(2 1/2 in.)

50.00mm

(2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%50.00mm

(2 in.)

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

37.50mm

(1 1/2 in.)N/A

25.00mm

(1 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

25.00mm

(1 in.)A-2-4 (0)

19.00mm

(3/4 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

19.00mm

(3/4 in.)

9.50mm

(3/8 in.) 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

9.50mm

(3/8 in.)

4.75mm

(#4) 49.0 3.4% 96.6%

4.75mm

(#4)

2.00mm

(#10) 122.0 8.4% 88.2%2.00mm

(#10) 100.0%

0.850mm

(#20) 0.0 5.4% 82.8%

0.850mm

(#20) 9.9 6.1% 93.9%

0.425mm

(#40) 0.0 4.5% 78.3%

0.425mm

(#40) 8.2 5.1% 88.8%

0.250mm

(#60) 0.0 4.6% 73.7%

0.250mm

(#60) 8.5 5.3% 83.5%

54-127-120095-042-716

Scott Lewis


Silty SAND (SM)

Water Content (g):

Plasticity Index:

-4 Portion

Richmond

AASHTO Soil

Classification: (f)


Liquid Limit:

Plastic Limit:

N/A

Non-Plastic

Non-Plastic

T87 T88 T89 T90 D2487


Total Soil N/A

N/A(#60) 0.0 4.6% 73.7% (#60) 8.5 5.3% 83.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 0.0 17.2% 56.5%

0.180mm

(#80) 31.5 19.5% 64.0%

0.150mm

(#100) 0.0 12.8% 43.7%

0.150mm

(#100) 23.4 14.5% 49.5%

0.075mm

(#200) 0.0 17.1% 26.5%0.075mm

(#200) 31.3 19.4% 30.1%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 0.0 26.5% 0.0%

<0.075mm

(-#200 on

Pan) 30.1%

Compacted

Specimen

Specimen

After

Immersion


0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 0.00

0 Non-Plastic

0

N/A

Location :

Depth :

Representing :

Remarks :



Liquid Limit could not be determined due to the sample sliding in the testing cup. Tests perforemd at Elko Soils Lab. Sample drawn on

9/24/12 and packed in a glass jar.

Liquid Limit (b)

Number of Blows

Weight of Dish:

8' - 16'



Liquid Limit:

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit (c)

Weight of Dish:

Weight of Water:



N/A


Property of :

Weight of Dry Soil:

Plastic Limit:

CBR Data (d)

% Water

% Density

CBR Value



N/A

Total Soil

-4 Portion


"

Report No. : 54-127-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Dry

Un

it W

eig

ht

(pcf)

Water Content (%)

COMPACTION GRAPH


Page 2 of 2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Resis

tan

ce (

psi)



95 3

30095-042-716

Matc

hline Sta. 2

7+0

0 Sheet 4

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d90347003.dgn

Plotted By: alex.taloma4:09:23 PM

12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY

DESIGN SUPERVISED BY

DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

(TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE)

(Location), Virginia

VDOT (Division) or Co. Name

REFERENCES

( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE

DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. )

Telephone: 804-524-6262

Contact: Matt Colvin

Colonial Heights, Virginia 23834

P. O. Box 3402

Virginia Department of TransportationTraffic Control:

[email protected] (no phone number provided)Contact: Jeremy R. Brown

Richmond, Virginia 23294

7500 West Broad Street

Dominion Virginia Power

Electric:

Telephone: 804-772-5978

Contact: William Swann Jr.

Richmond, Virginia 23230

2600 Brittons Hill Road

Verizon

Telephone:

Telephone: 757-466-5441

Contact: Victoria Duff

Norfolk, Virginia 23502

3719 East Virginia Beach BoulevardVirginia Natural Gas

Gas:

Telephone: 804-365-6099

Contact: Erin Armentrout

Hanover, Virginia 23069

7516 County Complex Road

Department of Public Utilities

Hanover County

Water:

Utility Owners

Roadway Engineer

Richmond, Virginia

VDOT Location & Design

ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY

RELOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED

BEYOND THE PROPOSED RIGHT- OF-

WAY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.

LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAYBOARD DATED 01/20/2010

BY RESOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION

DATED 10/04/1956

BY RESOLUTION OF HIGHWAY COMMISSION

Denotes area of proposed pavement

Denotes overlay of existing pavement

Denotes area of demolition of pavement

Denotes Construction Limits in Fills

Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts

F

C

Note :Dot - dashed lines denote Permanent Easements. Note :Dot - dot - dashed lines denote Temporary Easements.

Denotes Wetland Limits

Woolpert Inc.

Jason Henry, P.E (804)786-5975 (Central Office)

Alexander Owsiak, P.E (804)-524-6154 (Richmond District)>

J. Craig Hall, (804)-786-6743 (Central Office)

RW-201, C-501

PE-101,

0095-042-716,

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

OF CONSTRUCTION OR THE

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr._____

Mainline Profile____Sheet 3A

Lewistown Road Route 802

15" Pin

e

15" Pin

e

15" Pin

e

15" Pin

e

Conc.

North Lakerid

ge Pkwy.

14 15 16

17

18

19

20

21

S.D.P.B. 8, P

G. 487

Per

manent

Slo

pe Ease

ment

Varia

ble

Width

P.B. 36, PG. 630

Permanent Slope Easement

Variable Width

2.5’

C&

G

2.5’

C&

G

Asphalt

(General Vicinity Per Plat)D.B. 361, PG. 58

VEPCO Guy Stub Easement

Woven Wire Fence Metal Post

Woven Wire Fence

Plastic Sign Post

AL

UMINIU

M

SIG

N

Lewstown Rd.

Lakerid

ge Park

way

North Lakerid

ge Park

way

Conc.

Conc.

Exist R/W Based On Proj. #0095-042-116

Exist R/W Based On Proj. #0095-042-116

+16.3

7

149.0

8’

+78.7

1

104.6

7’

+00.6

1

117.5

4’

+36.7

4

55.2

8’

+08.95

85.42’

Easement For Dominion Virginia PowerVariable With Standard Utility

P.B. 36, PG. 63020’ Electrical Easement

Inv.

Out 201.5

6’

Inv. In 203.2

3’

In Pl.

15"

Conc. Pip

e

Inv.

Out 202.7

6’

Inv. In 203.3

9’

In Pl.

15"

Conc. Pip

e

Veriz

on #ss

T

T

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TCLP

TCLP

FHWV

WV

WV

WV

GMP

TCHH

TC

TC

TCHHTC

TCLP

WV

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TC

FH

WV

TC BoxTCHH

TC

TCHH

TCHHTC

TCHHTC

TCLP

UNK. MH

GV

FH

WV

Tele. Ped.N

o#

T

In

Ground

Box

TC

WV(2)

TC

TC1

Traffic Sig

nal Pole

FH

Traffic Contr

ol

Box

Traffic Contr

ol

Box

Traffic Contr

ol

Box

T

Tel. P

ed.

Traffic Contr

ol

Box

Traffic Contr

ol

Box

Vepco #C

H 99

Vepco No #

Guy

Wire

Traffic Contr

ol

Box

3.762 Ac.P.B. 36, PG. 91

D.B. 1310, PG. 333Parcel ID 7788-57-3629

17.988 Ac.P.B. 38, PG. 242

D.B. 2876, PG. 1540Parcel ID 7788-67-3064

HANOVER COUNTY, VIRGINIA

LEWISTOWN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC

6’ Paved Shoulder

6’ Paved Shoulder

400’ Taper

+38.85

32.98’

6’ Paved Shoulder

6’ Paved Shoulder

PO

T 20+0

0.0

020

21

22

23

24 P

C 24+3

8.3

7

25

26

27

+48.0

0+4

9.5

2

+50.0

0

100.48’ Transition

+.01.00

253’ Dual Left Turn Lanes

Sta. 22+49.52 Lewistown Constr. BL

Begin Proj. 0095-042-716, PE-101, C-501 @

001

DEVELOPMENT CORP.DOMINION LAND

18.305 AC.P.B. 36, PG. 693

D.B. 2987, PG. 1324Parcel ID 7788-58-8148

R = 20,000.00’

PI = 29+07.69

T = 469.32’

24+38.37PC =

33+76.84

L = 938.47’

Lewistown Rd. Constr. BL

12’

12’

12’

12’

13’

13’

12’


St’d. GR-9 Guardrail Terminal Req’d.

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

3-1

2’R

R= 20,008’

R= 20,004’

DV= 45 MPH

E = Normal CrownPT =

DV= 45 MPH

E = Normal Crown

PT =

St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.



3-2

5’R

St’d. Rad. CG-2 Req’d.

St’d. GR-11 Guardrail Req’d.F CC F

C

St’d. GR-2 Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. FE-W1 Fence Req’d.

Prop. R/W & Limited Access LineStation 22+11.97Line & Proposed R/WBegin Limited Access

253.92’ WBL Transition

236.29’ EBL Transition

Begin Pavement Constr.

205.86

95 4RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

Matc

hline Sta. 3

4+0

0 Sheet 5

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

40095-042-716

Matc

hline Sta. 2

7+0

0 Sheet 3

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347004.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.











See Sheet 3For Utility Owner Information

Matchline Sta. 14+50.00 Sheet 4C





LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY

DATED 10/04/1956


BOARD DATED 01/20/2010







F

C


DV= 45 MPH

E = No Super

PT =



Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Rp. B Spur Prof__Sheet 4E

Rp. B Profile__Sheet 4D, 4E

Rp. A Spur Prof__Sheet 4B

Rp. A Profile_____Sheet 4B

Drainage Descr.___

Mainline Profile___Sheet 4A

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347004.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.






Wooded

Asp

halt

N 55° 33’ 01" E 22

23

24 25

26

27

28

PL

= 68°04’34" Rt.

PI 29+82.12 R

oute 8

02 S

urvey

Baseline

PI 67+52.34 I-9

5 Survey Baseli

ne

PB. 36, PG. 630

20’ Electrical Easement

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0660-042-163, C

501

Inv.

Out

= 202.0

8

Inv. In =

202.9

8

In Pl. 2

7"

CM

P

Top of 54"

CM

P

Vertical Pip

e =

206.4

2

In Pl. O

verflo

w

Contr

ol

Devic

e

Asp

halt

Asphalt

4’ W

oven Wire

Fence

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

In Pl. 24" Conc. Pipe

Woven Wire Fence

Woven

Wire F

ence

Elev 198.00 SB

L E

NT

RA

NC

E

RA

MP

SBL

EXIT R

AMP

+51.88

131.28’

+19.7

0

164.5

2’

+61.80

+03.6

9

57.2

9’

+23.7

5

40.0

0’

Conc.

Conc. Ditch

Inv Out 200.9

1’In

v. In 201.97’

In Pl. 3

0" Plastic Pip

eIn Pl. C

onc. H

ead

wall

Inv. Out 203.68’

In Pl. 15" Plastic Pipe

Fl 206.08’

Top 210.64’

In Pl. Metal Grate

Inv. O

ut 200.3

0’

Inv. In 201.49’

In Pl. 2

4" Plastic Pip

e

Painted Median

TC

TCHHTC

WV

WV

WV

FH

WV

FH

WV

WV

FH

Water Vault (

AR

V)

Vepco # EI 07

Vepco # EI 39

Guy

Wire

Guy

Wire

Guy

Wire

Traffic Contr

ol

Box


6’ Paved Shoulder

6’ Paved Shoulder

8’ Paved

Shoulder

12’ P

aved Should

er

+76.8421.00’

+83.39

33.84’

+05.04

33.00’

+52.56

26.27’

6’ Paved Shoulder

27

28

29

30

31

32

33 P

T 33

+76.8

4

34

6’ Paved Shoulder

4’ Paved

Shoulder

PI = 29+07.69

T = 469.32’

R = 20,000.00’

24+38.37PC =

33+76.84

L = 938.47’

100’ Shoulder Transition

+00.0

0

+00.0

0

6’

8’

100’ Shoulder Transition

8’ Paved Shoulder8’6’

+43.0

0

+43

+00

8’ Paved Shoulder

+06.0

0

+01.00

405’ WBL Transition (12’)

PI =

12+97.9

0

T = 1

32.57’

L = 2

49.66’

R = 3

00.00’

11+65.33

PC =

14+14.

99

11

PC 11+65.33

12

13

14

PT 14

+14.9

9

15

PO

T 15

+59.4

6

POT 10+00.00

10

11

12

13

10

11

12

13

10

11

12

13

10

11

12

Sta. 11+00.00 RPA Constr. BL

Begin Const. Ramp A @

Sta. 13+00.35 RPA Constr. BL

End Const. Ramp A @

Sta. 14+35.98 RPAS Constr. BL

End Const. Ramp A Spur @

Sta. 11+00.00 RPAS Constr. BL

Begin Const. Ramp A Spur @

Sta. 11+89.89 RPBS Constr. BL

Begin Const. Ramp B Spur @PI = 10+99.04

T = 99.04’

L = 198.08’

R = 20,033.00’

10+00.00PC =

11+98.08

PI = 13

+82.11

T = 18

4.03’

L = 286.73’

R = 18

0.00’

11+98.08

PRC =

14+84.81

Sta. 12+95.09 RPB Constr. BL

Begin Const. Ramp B @

001

DEVELOPMENT CORP.

DOMINION LAND

18.305 AC.

P.B. 36, PG. 693

D.B. 2987, PG. 1324

Parcel ID 7788-58-8148

DEVELOPMENT CORP.DOMINION LAND

10.413 Ac. (Plat)

P.B. 36, PG. 693

D.B. 2987, PG. 1324

Parcel ID 7788-68-3202


Ram

p A Constr. B

L

Ramp A S

pur

Constr. B

L

Ra

mp B

Constr. B

L

Ram

p B Spur C

onstr. BL


17.988 Ac.

P.B. 38, PG. 242

D.B. 2876, PG. 1540

Parcel ID 7788-67-3064

17.5’

17.5’

22’

23’

13’

12’

13’

12’

12’

13’

12’

13’ 13’

13’

12’

12’

Lewistown Rd. Constr. BL Ramp B Spur Constr. BL

Ram

p B Spur C

onstr. BLDV = 2

5

MPH

E = 8

%

PT =

Ramp A S

pur

Constr. BL

DV = 2

5 MPH

E = 6.85

%PT

=

Rad.= 35’ L = 80’

St’d. G

R-2 Req’d.



St’d. G

R-2

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2



St’d. G

R-2

Req’d.

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

+91.62

28.80’

4-5

1’R

4-7

2’R

4-6

5’R

4-1

10’R

4-2

2’R

4-3

61.5’ R

R= 20,008’

4-4

2’R

R= 20,004’R= 20,008’

362’ Lt. Turn Lane

DV= 45 MPH

E = Normal Crown

PT = PRC =

13

14

Median Req’d.

St’d. MS-1

Median Req’d.

St’d. MS-1

Median Req’d.

St’d. MS-1

8’ P

aved Shoulder

4’ Paved Shoulder

Var. Width Paved Shoulder

+06.44

33.00’

+16.80

17.50’

+76.84

33.00’

+80.52

43.95’

+16.80

21.50’

Islan

d Re

q’d.

St’d. SI-2 Sign

F C

FC

FC

F

CF

F


Prop. R/W & Limited Access Line

St’d. FE-W

1 Fence R

eq’d.

St’d. F

E-W1 F

ence R

eq’d.

Prop. R/

W

& Li

mited Access

Line

Prop. R/W

& Limite

d Access Line

Station 30+47.45

Line & Proposed R/W

Limited Access

Begin Mod.

Delta = 47° 21’ 58.77

" Lt.

POC 31

+49.05 Lewisto

wn R

oad

Constr. B

L

POT 13+59.29

Ramp A C

onstr.

BL

Delta = 91°50’16.58" Lt.

POC 31+96.54 Lewistown Road Constr. BL

POT 12+66.47 Ramp B Constr. BL

Fixed Object Attachment Req’d.

St’d. GR-FOA-2 Type 1 Guardrail

Rad. GR-2 Guardrail Req’d.


PC 10

+00.0

0

11

PR

C 11+9

8.0

812

13

14

Curve RPBS2

PI = 10+99.04T = 99.04’

L = 198.08’

R = 20,033.00’

10+00.00

PC =PRC =11+98.08

Curve RPBS3

PI = 13+82.11T = 184.03’

L = 286.73’

R = 180.00’11+98.08

PRC =PT =

14+84.81

2700205.86

2975205.67

3375204.15

4C-01

4C-02

30"

42"

4C-03

AIP

AIP

AIP

AIP

TBR

TBR

5-08

24"

4C-04

42"

95

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

0095-042-716

REFERENCES










Matchline Sta. 533+50.00 Sheet 5

Matchline Sta. 14+50 Sheet 4



Matchline She

et 12

Matc

hlin

e Sheet 12

C

Matchline Sheet 5

4C

4C

DATED 10/04/1956



BY RESOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY



Denotes area of demolition of pavementDenotes Construction Limits in Fills


F

C


Denotes slope correction

Jason Henry, P.E. (804) 786-5975 (Central Office)

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

Note :Figures in brackets and dot - dashed lines denote Permanent Easements. Note :Figures in parenthesis and dot - dot - dashed lines denote Temporary Easements.

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347004c.dgn

Plotted By: alex.taloma9:12:57 AM

12/12/2013

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.





SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE

Woolpert Inc., 8/13/10

THE SPECTRA GROUP INC, 8/10/10

Janet Hedrick, P.E. (804) 524-6146 (Richmond District)



Plans____________20 SeriesUtility AdjustmentSignal Plans_______19 SeriesMarkings__________18 SeriesSign & PavementProfiles___________17 SeriesStorm SewerDrainage Descr.____16 SeriesSWM Pond Details______R/W Sheet________Sheet 4CRWRamp B Spur Profile_Sheet 4ERamp B Profile___Sheet 4D, 4EControl plan_______Sheet 4GErosion and SedimentData_______ Sheets 1E-1E(4)Constr. Alignment

AIP

TBR

RP

Existing Drainage Item to be Removed.

Existing Drainage Item to Remain.

Existing Drainage Item to be Abandoned in place in accordance with St’d. PP-1.


AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR

ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION.

11/22/13

Sig

n

Sign

Air P

ark R

oad Route 8

09

Sign

I-95 S

BL

I-95

NB

LAsphalt

Asphalt

Wooded

Wooded

Asphalt

Asp

halt

Sig

n

Inv. =

191.5

0

In Pl. 2

4" Co

nc. Pipe

In Pl. F

ES

24" Oak

Conc. Flume

Guardrail

(b)

66

67

68

= 68°04’34" Rt.

PI 29+82.12 R

oute 8

02 S

urvey

Baseline

PI 67+52.34 I-9

5 Survey Baseli

ne

RW Mon

+57.91 215.53’

D. B. 16

02, P

G. 19

5

Variable Width Utility E

asem

ent

195.68

195.2

2

193.49

192.5

119

0.99

191.37

192.95

193.94

194.86

198.78

198.31

197.86

196.57

197.25

196.84

Inv. O

ut = 18

9.37

In Pl. 2

4" C

MP

Inv. In = 18

9.42

Rim

= 195.87

In Pl. DI

Inv. = 19

1.35

In Pl. 2

4" Co

nc. Pipe

In Pl. E

ndaw

all

Refle

ctor

Refle

ctor

Wooded

Woo

ded

Woo

ded

Woo

ded

Gra

vel

Gra

vel

4’ W

oven Wire

Fence

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

Elev 195.63Inv. Out


Metal

Guardrail

Conc.

Head

wall

Metal

Guardrail

Elev 198.00Inv. In

SB

L E

NT

RA

NC

E

RA

MP

SB

L E

NT

RA

NC

E

RA

MP

+61.80

165.88’

Conc. Ditch

Exist. R/

W

&

Limited

Access

Hwy. Project 0660-0

42-163, C

501

Appro

x. Location Of Exist. Limited Access

Gas Marker Post

Eoi E

oi

Eoi

T11

T16

T

S

S

Gas Test Station

Inv. Out = 190.96

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Inv. In = 190.99

Rim = 201.35

In Pl. SM

H

Vepco #FI98

Tel. Ped. #4

FH

WV

WV

Next Structure Inaccessible

Inv.

Out = 190.27

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Inv.

In = 190.47

Rim = 196.32

In Pl.

SMH

6.0 +/-

Ac.

D.B. 505, P

G. 10

D.B. 1400, P

G. 799

D.B. 2818, P

G. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5

706

HANOVER-L

EWIS

TO

WN-6, LL

C

LE

WIS

TO

WN

CO

MM

ER

CE

CE

NT

ER, L

LC

17.9

88

Ac.

P.B. 3

8, P

G. 2

42

D.B. 2

876, P

G. 15

40

Parcel ID

7788-6

7-3

064

4’ P

aved Should

er

8’ P

aved Should

er

8’ P

aved Should

er

4’ P

aved Should

er

14’

Sta. 15+46.13 RPBS Constr. BL

End Const. Ramp B Spur @

530

531

532

PT 532+48.94

533

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

Ra

mp B

Constr. B

L

Ra

mp B

Spur Constr. B

L

PI = 25+54.11

Rte. I-95 NB Constr. BL

532+48.94

PI = 522+07.66

T = 1,048.11’

L = 2,089.39’

R = 10,569.00’

511+59.55PC =

PT =

Rte. I-95 Baseline

St’d. G

R-2

Guardrail R

eq’d.

St’d. G

R-2

Guardrail R

eq’d.

Terminal Treatment Req’d.

St’d. GR-9 Guardrail

MB-3 Req’d.

Median Barrier

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence Req’d.

12’ Paved Shoulder


22

23

24

PT 24+12.69

25

15

16

17

PC 17+15.01

18

Ra

mp B

Spur

PI = 19

+30.5

0

T

= 149.9

8’

L = 2

98.7

7’

R

= 1,364.0

0’

17+8

0.5

2P

CC =

PT

=20+7

9.2

9

PT 14+84.81

15

16

17

PC 17+15.01

PCC 17+80.52

18

16

17

18

19

PT 19+

25.33

Curve SBEP2PI = 14+62.91

T = 462.91’L = 925.33’R = 11,616.00’

10+00.00PC =

PT =19+25.33

Ramp B Constr. BLPI = 20+26.44

T = 311.43’L = 612.49’R = 1,372.00’

17+15.01PC =

23+27.49

Taper

300’

L = 2

86.7

3’

PI = 13

+82.11

T

= 184.0

3’

R

= 180.0

0’

11+98.0

8P

RC =

14+8

4.8

1

Ra

mp B

Spur Constr. B

L

St’d. U

D-4

Req’d.

St’d. U

D-4 Req’d.

St’d. U

D-4 Req’d.

Req’d.

St’d. U

D-4

Req’d.

St’d. U

D-4 12’

&

Varia

ble Paved Shoulder

St’d. U

D-4

Req’d.

Ra

mp B

Spur

PI = 17

+47.7

7

T

= 32.7

6’

L = 6

5.5

1’

R

= 1,358.0

0’

17+15.0

1P

C =

PC

C =17

+80.5

2

296.3

2’ M

erge Lane

14’

Rp. B

+81.16

Rp. B

+84.81

I-95 BL

+58.90

I-95 BL

+88.00

Prop. R/

W

&

Limited

Access Lin

e

LR

= See Profile Sheet

DV = 2

5

MP

H

E

= 7.7

%

PT

=

LR= See Profile Sheet

DV = 50 MPH

E = 6.5%

PT =

CF

FC

Curve DITCH-2

PI = 203+21.52T = 98.06’

L = 160.18’

R = 110.00’202+23.46

PC =PT =203+83.64

PC 20

2+23.46

203

PT 203+8

3.64

Ditc

h

13BH-0

08

13BH-0

09

009

001

RW PLANS

0095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

5

95 5Matchline Sta. 537+75 Sheet 5B

Matchline Sta. 11+25 Sheet 5B

RW-201, C-501, B-660

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347005.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matc

hline Sta. 3

4+0

0 Sheet 4

Matc

hline Sta. 4

1+25 Sheet 6

Matchline Sta. 533+50 Sheet 4C

Matchline

Sheet 12

C

Matchline Sheet 12CMatchline Sheet 4C

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706

HANOVER-LEWISTOWN-6, LLC

MG LEWISTOWN ROAD 3, LLC

Less D.B. 784, PG. 675

Less D.B. 1400, PG. 796

2.5 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 619

Parcel ID 7788-78-5271

TRUST

HPT TA PROPERTIES

25.144 Ac.

D.B. 2844, PG. 259

Parcel ID 7788-79-0393

019*

019*






DATED 10/04/1956






F

C







Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr.____

Rp. D Profile______Sheet 5C Mainline Profile____Sheet 5A

Shrub

Sign

Ram

p


Air Park

Road

Route 80

9

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sign

Sign

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

15" Pines (3)

15" Pines (2)

Wooded

Wooded

Wooded

I-95 S

BL

I-95

NB

L

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Wooded

Asp

halt

Asphalt

Sig

n

Sig

n

O/H

Sign

Guardrail

Sig

n

Guardrail

Guardrail

Inv.

Out

= 206.14

Inv. In =

207.16

In Pl. 12"

Conc. Pip

e

Conc.

Clearance = 14.8

4’

Clearance = 15.16’

Clearance = 14.66’

Colu

mn

Colu

mn

Colu

mn

Colu

mn

Colu

mn

Colu

mn

Barrier

Jersey

Barrier

Jersey

PI 33

+88.9

9

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

N 12

° 31’ 3

3"

W

69

70

71

72

D.B. 1302, PG. 18

15’ x 15’ Water Easement

RW

Mon +13.71

124.39’

=

10°5

8’3

0" Lt.

= 68°04’34" Rt.

PI 29+82.12 R

oute 8

02 S

urvey

Baseline

PI 67+52.34 I-9

5 Survey Baseli

ne

For Virgini

a Power

Variable W

idth Easeme

nt

= 15.0

0’

Clearance

203.95 205.67207.59 207.89206.53

207.65 207.71 207.86

207.88

202.81

194.71

Exist. R/W Hwy. Project 0809-042-275, C501

Double Guardrail

Guardrail

Guardrail

Guardrail

Refle

ctor

Woode

d

Wooded

Wooded

With Asphalt Bridge Deck

Conc. and Steel Bridge

Steel Railing

Steel Railing

Guardrail

Double Guardrail

Asp

halt & Gra

velAsp

halt & Gra

vel

Asphalt

Asphalt

4’ Woven Wire Fence

4’ W

oven Wire

Fence

4’ Woven Wire

Fence

Retainin

g

Wall

Retainin

g

Wall

Retainin

g

Wall

Retainin

g

Wall

Eoi

Eoi

Eoi

WV

Eoi

WV

Eoi

(QL C)

(QL C)

W3

W1

T2

U1

T

WV(Flushin

g

Hydrant)

W3

W3

W4

Water Vault (

AR

V)

T11

U5

T11

W8

S

S

T

Inv. Out = 192.54

In Pl. 8" P

VC Pipe

Inv. In = 192.56

Rim = 205.10

In Pl. SM

H

FH

Vepco No #

Tel. Ped.

#3

Vepco No #

Guy

Wire

WV

6’ Paved Shoulder6’ Paved Shoulder

6’ Paved Shoulder

100’ Taper

34

35

36

37

38

39

40 P

C 40+11.79

41

175’ Lt. Turn Lane362’ Lt. Turn Lane

100’ Taper10

11

Delta= 86°34’03.67" Lt.

POT 40+01.34 Lew

istown R

d. Constr. BL

POT 10+00.00 R

amp D Constr. B

L

Sta. 10+45.07 RPD Constr. BL

Begin Const. Ramp D @

534

535

536

537

TRUST

HPT TA PROPERTIES

25.144 Ac.

D.B. 2844, PG. 259

Parcel ID 7788-79-0393

009

002


PI = 45+94.72

T = 582.93’

L = 1,151.83’

R = 3,035.00’

40+11.79PC =

51+63.62

W= 0

LR= 104’

DV= 45 MPH

E = 3.1%

PT =



Begin Bridge Proj. 0095-042-716, B-660 @

End Proj. 0095-042-716, B-660 @Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

Ra

mp

D

Constr. B

L

13’

13’

12’

12’

12’

13’

13’

12’

12’

13’

13’

12’

12’

16’

Min.

4’ Paved Should

er


Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2



288.52’ Lt. Turn La.

5-1

2’R

5-2

2’R R= 3,043’R= 3,039’

St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d. St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.

Median Req’d.

St’d. MS-1

+62.02

33.00’

+64.56

39.00’

St’d. GR-11 Guardrail Terminal Req’d.

8’ Paved Shoulder


FC

FF

F

F

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-11

MB-3 Req’d.

Median Barrier

MB-3 Req’d.

Median Barrier


Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2A

St’d. GR-2A Guardrail Req’d.

Prop. RW & Limited Access Line


Delta= 86°34’03.67" Lt.

POT 40+01.34 Lew

istown R

d. Constr. BL

POT 10+00.00 R

amp D Constr. B

L

Delta= 113°23’30.62" Lt.

POT 535+81.60 R

te. I-95 BL

POT 35+80.86Lew

istown R

d. Constr. BL

12’

&

Varia

ble Paved Shoulder


St’d. GR-FOA-2 Type 1 Guardrail Object Attachment Req’d.

Guardrail Fixed

St’d. GR-FOA-2 Type 2

Object Attachment Req’d.

Guardrail Fixed

St’d. GR-FOA-2 Type 1


St’d. GR-FOA-2 Type 2 Guardrail



19

20

21

22

26

27

28

29S

BE

P

Constr. B

L

NB

EP

Constr. B

L

1100212.92

3775205.68

PC-N

B-53500

201.51

PC-SB-53500

201.30

95

0

SCALE

25’ 50’ 0095-042-716

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347005d.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.
















LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAYBY RESOLUTION OF HIGHWAY COMMISSION

DATED 10/04/1956






F

C

Note :Dot - dot - dashed lines denote Temporary Easements.

Note :Dot - dashed lines denote Permanent Easements.



Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Matchline Sta. 541+50 Sheet 5B

5D

5D


Sign

Sign

Sig

n

Sign

Sign

Gate

Parkin

g

Parkin

g

10" Pear 10" Pear

Wooded

Wooded

Wooded

I-95 S

BL

I-95

NB

L

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Wooded

Asphalt A

sphalt

Parkin

g

Sig

nReflector

Reflector

Reflector

Sig

nSig

n

Reflector

Sig

n

Sign

Sig

n

Wooded

Asphalt Sig

n

Sig

n

Asphalt

Sig

n

N 13

° 02’ 50"

W

77

78

79

80

81

(L=

343.3

5’)

(R=

982.74’)

(L= 15

0.17’)

(R= 394.0

4’)

(L=

341.96’)

(R=

982.7

4’)

RW Mon +11.58123.08’

208.02

207.77

206.83

206.24

206.54

206.47

207.70

207.17

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0660-0

42-163, C

501

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0095-0

42-101, G

2

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 660-0

42-163, C

501

10" Pear

10" Pear

10" Pear

0.5’ Curb

0.5’ Curb

0.5’ Curb

0.5’ Curb

Shrubs

Sign

Double Guardrail

Double Guardrail

In Pl. Endwall Inv. Outfall = 204.13Inv. = 205.95 In Pl. 15" Conc. Pipe

In Pl. Endwall Inv. Outfall = 203.79Inv. In = 204.01 In Pl. 24" Conc. PipeIn Pl. Endwall

Underdrain

In Pl.

Asphalt &

Gravel

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

Pad

Du

mpster

Elec. Box

Unknown Box

G1

G1

Unknown Box

E

U4

U3

LP

No#

LP

No#

LP

No#

LP

No#

POT 15+0

0.00

542

543

544

545

546

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

12’ Paved Should

er

12’ Paved Should

er

27

POT 27+80.45

34

35

36

37

SB

EP

Constr. B

L

NB

EP

Constr. B

L

PO

C Sta. 5

42

+59.7

1 Rte. I-9

5

Baseline (5

6.4

7’ Lt.)

PO

T

Sta. 2

7+8

0.4

5 S

BE

P

Constr. B

L

End S

B

Rte 1-95

Overla

y

@

PO

C Sta. 5

46+15.2

8

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline (5

7.14’

Rt.)

PC Sta. 3

7+6

9.2

1 N

BE

P

Constr. B

L

End

NB

Rte 1-95

Overla

y

@

PC-NB-54500209.57

Paved Flume

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

0095-042-716 6

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716, 695

Matc

hline Sta. 4

8+0

0 Sheet 7

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347006.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.













Matc

hline Sta. 4

1+25 Sheet 5

Matchline Sh

eet 12

C

Matchline Sheet 6C





DATED 10/04/1956



BY RESOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY




F

C






Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr.____

Rp. C Profile______Sheet 6B

Mainline Profile____Sheet 6A

(a)

(b)

(a)(b)

Inv. = 2

03.7

7In Pl. 18"

Conc. F

ES

In Pl. 2-2

4"

Conc. Pip

es

Botto

m of Str

ucture =

201.03

Rim

= 205.8

8In Pl. Drain

age Junction Box

Asphalt

Asphalt

6" Crape

Myrtle

Asphalt

2" Fern

Sig

n

Crosswalk

Vacuum

Phone Booth

Sig

n

Lewistown Road Rou

te 802

Conc

Conc

Asphalt

Sig

n

Conc

Conc

Conc

Conc

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

Conc

2"

Oak

2"

Oak

6" Pear

Post

2"

Oak

2"

Oak

Shrubs (12)

2" Pears (3)

Sig

n

Sig

n

w/

Landscape Tim

bers

6" Crape

Myrtle

Well

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

ns (3)

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

3" Pin

e

Sig

n

Sig

n

Cut

Over Area S

mall V

ario

us Trees

Sig

n

Sig

n

Asphalt

Wooded

Sig

nConc. Isla

nd

Gravel

Asphalt

Asphalt

Brick Paving Stones

of Previo

us Str

ucture

Unable to Deter

min

e Location

Inv. = 2

02.8

3In Pl. 8

" P

VC Pip

e

Sig

n

PI 39+2

2.9

6

N 44° 3

4’ 31" E

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

(L= 89.35’)

(R= 572.96’)

Varia

ble

Width Drain

age Ease

ment

PL

PL

PL

D.B. 1302, PG. 18

15’ x 15’ Water Easement

IP +

82.23

6.65’

Pip

e +9

7.5

719

5.9

4’

IP +39.13

75.34’

RW

Mon Broken +9

4.5

9

24.75’

=

29°5

4’5

3" Rt.

For Virginia Power

Variable Width Easement

Well

207.86

207.88

209.44208.18

206.28

203.91

201.05 201.54

200.90

201.05

200.80201.05

200.80

201.05

200.56

201.05

204.11204.61205.55

207.25


Exist. R/W Hwy. Pr

oject 0809-

042-275, C5

01

Brush

Brush

Conc. Ditch

0.5’

Curb

0.5’ Curb

0.5’ Curb

0.5’ Curb

0.5’

Curb

0.5’

Curb

Shed

Fr.

Inv. Out (b) = 2

02.56

Inv. Out (a) = 2

02.61

In Pl. 2

-24" C

onc. Pipes

In Pl. E

ndwall

Inv. In =

In Pl. 18" Conc. Pip

e

Inv.

Out = 2

01.55


e

Inv. In =

201.64

Rim

= 205.9

5

In Pl. C

onc.

DI

Inv.

Out = 2

02.0

1


e

Inv. In =

202.0

6

Rim

= 206.0

6

In Pl. DI

Inv. Out (b) = 199.51

Inv. Out (a) = 199.47

In Pl. Endwall

Shed

Fr.

#10114

1 - Sty Fr. Bldg

Shed

Fr.

Inv. Outfall = 199.33

Inv. Out = 200.05


Rim = 203.45In Pl. DI

Caps

Gas Filler

for Bell Atlantic

9.842’ Wide Utility Easement

D.B. 2971, P

G. 18

77

Per

manent

Drain

age Ease

ment

Varia

ble

Width

for Bell Atlantic

9.842’ Wide Utility Easement

for Bell Atlan

tic9.842’ Wide U

tility Easemen

t

0.5’ Curb

0.5’ Curb

Asphalt

Gravel

Gravel

0.5’

Curb

Shrubs

Shrubs

Shrubs

Over Gas Pu

mps

Canopy


6’ Chain Link Fence

Wooded

Brush

Brush

Brush

Scattered 2" Oak

s

Separator Tank

Oil/

Water

Inv. = 203.39

of Next Structure

Unable to Determine Location

In Pl. 21" CMP

Inv. = 203.46

In Pl. Endwall

Easement

Construction

Permanent

T

T

Eoi

Eoi

Eoi

WV

Eoi

WM(2)

Irr Box(2)

Eoi

GV

Elec. V

ault

Elec. V

ault

Elec. V

ault

Eoi

Elec. V

ault

Water

Marker Post

T2

T3

W5

Elec. Vault

E

Eoi

Eoi

G1

T4

E

G2

W5

E

G3G3

E

T2

T1

T2

T1

T8T8

T2

T1

T8

G1

E

T7

E

Elec. B

ox

T7

U2

WM

Eoi

W7

Water Monitor S

tation #10137

T12

W10

WV(2)

Irr. H

ot

Box

Irr. V

alve

E3

T12

EoiEoi

GV

W/

Gas Test

Station

W9

Tel. P

ed. N

o#

T13

S

S

S

S

S

LP

No#

LP

No#

LP

No#

Vepco H

K 37

Vepco H

K 26

Vepco #GK26

T

T

TT

T

Marker

Fib

er Optic

Gas Lin

e

Marker

Inv.

Out

= 19

7.9

8

In Pl. 6

" P

VC Pip

e

Inv. In =

197.9

9

Rim

= 206.4

2

In Pl. S

MH

Inv.

Out

= 19

7.12

In Pl. 8

" C.I. Pip

eIn

v. In =

197.17

Rim

= 205.0

8In Pl. S

MH

(a)

(b)

(c)

Inv.

Out (c) =

197.0

9In Pl. 8

" C.I. Pip

eIn

v. In (b) =

196.7

3In Pl. 8

" C.I. Pip

eIn

v. In (a) =

196.12

Rim

= 205.2

3In Pl. S

MH

Inv.

Out

= 19

5.3

0In Pl. 8

" P

VC Pip

eIn

v. In =

195.3

1Rim

= 206.3

8In Pl. S

MH

Inv. Out = 193.78In Pl. 8" PVC PipeInv. In = 193.79Rim = 207.13In Pl. SMH

FH

LP

NO #

LP

NO #

Vepco G

L 60

Vepco G

K 67

Tel. P

ed

Veriz

on #2

Tel. Ped. #SS

Tel. P

ed # 5

Tel. P

ed # H

H 12

1 F

OAccess Box

Tel. Ped. #SS

1 Ac.

D.B. 966, PG. 491

D.B. 1385, PG. 714

Parcel ID 7788-78-7730

25.144 Ac.

D.B. 2844, PG. 259Parcel ID

7788-79-0393

THIRD GENERATION, L. P.

HPT TA PROPERTIES TRUST

LLEWELLYN COLEMAN

MATTIE COLEMAN &

6’ Paved Shoulder

PI = 45+94.72

T = 582.93’L = 1,151.83’R = 3,035.00’

40+11.79PC =

51+63.62

W= 0

LR= 104’

DV= 45 MPH

E = 3.1%

PT =

42

43 44

46

47

48

14’

8’ Paved Should

er

14’14’

14’

4’ Paved Should

er

45

Sta. 128+94.61 RPC Constr

. BLEnd Const. Ramp

C @

10

11

12POT 12+00.00

Type 1V 4.4

%

Grade

26’

Mod. C

G-11 Entr. R

eq’d.

019*

020*

HPT TA PROPERTIES TRUST

25.144 Ac.

D.B. 2844, PG. 259

Parcel ID 7788-79-0393

021*

TRUSTHPT TA PROPERTIES

021*

002

003 004


WEST ENGINEERING COMPANY, INCORPORATED16.87 Ac.

D.B. 506, PG. 743

D.B. 506, PG. 768

Parcel ID 7788-79-7366

MG LE

WIS

TO

WN

RO

AD 3, LLC

Less D.B. 784, P

G. 675

Less D.B. 14

00, P

G. 796

2.5

Ac.

D.B. 2958, P

G. 619

Parcel ID 7788-7

8-5

271


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026 LLEWELLYN COLEMAN

MATTIE COLEMAN &

1.5 Ac.

D.B. 249, PG. 432

Parcel ID 7788-88-0405

Ra

mp C

Constr. B

L

Type 1V 3.9

%

Grade

40’ St’d. C

G-11 Entr. R

eq’d.

Type 1V 3.9

%

Grade

40’ St’d. C

G-11 Entr. R

eq’d.

12’

13’

13’

12’

12’

13’

13’

12’

15’

286.96’ Taper

+52.3

2

13’

13’

12’

15’

8’ Paved Shoulder

17’ 17’15’14’


478’

Dual Left

Turn Lanes

570’ Rig

ht

Turn Lane

Req’d. (CG-3)St’d. MS-1 Median

R= 3,043’

R= 3’039’

6-1

2’R

6-2

2’R

6-3300’R

6-5

13’R

6-650’R

6-7

2’R

6-8

2’R

6-935’R

6-1025’R

6-115’R

6-1225’R

6-14

5’R

6-1325’R

6-15

5’R

6-1425’R

6-4257’R

6-1660.45’R

R= 3,043’

R= 3,027’

Std. CG-3 Curb Req’d.

Std. C

G-3

Curb Req’d.

R = 3,083’ R = 3,095’

R = 3,083’

Std. C

G-3

Curb Req’d.

53’ Lt.

+20.3

9

37.42’ Rt.

+70.00

20.74’ Rt.

+82.9

0

18.75’ Lt.

+79.35

13.00’ Lt.

+00.00

Curb Req’d.

Std. C

G-3

Curb Req’d.Std. Rad. CG-3

Std. CG-3 Curb Req’d.

288.52’ Lt. Turn La.


Req’d. Median

St’d. MS-1

FC

CF

C F

St’d. CG-7 Req’d.

Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Limited

Access Line

Prop. R

W

&


for Entrance

Constr. Easement

Prop. Temp.

for Entrances

Constr. Easement

Prop. Temp.

for Entrance

Constr. Easement

Prop. Temp.

Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Easement for Entrance

Prop. Temp. Constr.

Ease

ment for Entrance

Prop. T

emp. C

onstr.

Easement for Slopes

Prop. Temp. Constr.


St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence Req’d.

for Slopes

Constr. Easement

Prop. Temp.

Station 43+25End Mod. Limited Access

Delta= 91°01’09.74" R

t.

POC 44+13

.86 Lewistow

n Rd. Constr. B

L

POT 129+15.3

7 Ram

p C Constr. BL

Prop. RW & Limited Access Line


PO

T 11+6

7.6

0

Sta. 11+70.00 Constr. BL

End Const. ENT4382 @

St’d. SI-3 Req’d

St’d. M

S-1A

Media

n Req’d.

Sta. 10+45.01 Constr. BL

Begin Const. ENT4382 @

Delta = 88° 53’ 14.39" Rt.

POC 43+82.78 Lewistown Rd. Constr. BL

POT 10+00.00 ENT4382 Constr. BL

128

PT 128+84.21

129

123+22.73

Curve RPC16

PI = 126+25.76

T = 303.04’

L = 561.48’

R = 602.00’

PC =128+84.21

DV = 45 MPHE = -8%PT =

12750208.31

4250208.23

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

0095-042-716

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716, 6C95

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347006c.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matchline S

heet 14

Matchline Sheet 7

Matchline Sheet 6

Matc

hlin

e Sheet 12

C

Matchline Sheet 13

6C






Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Well

Metal

Contain

er

Accordin

g to O

wner)

Septic Tank (A

bandoned

(140

Yards)

P LP L

PL

PL

316.5

3’

IP

+07.9

0

Shed

Fr.

Shed

Fr.

8

Visible Graves

Ce

metery

Accordin

g to O

wner)

Priv

y (A

bandoned

Trailer #10103

Wooded

Wooded

Vepco G

K 96

Vepco No #

Less D.B. 1448, PG. 488

1 �Ac.

W.B. 29, PG. 378

Parcel ID 7788-88-2348

Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026

1.5 Ac.

D.B. 249, PG. 432

Parcel ID 7788-88-0405

MELINDA TYLER


LLEWELLYN COLEMAN

MATTIE COLEMAN &

004

003

007

018*


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026 LLEWELLYN COLEMAN

MATTIE COLEMAN &

1.5 Ac.

D.B. 249, PG. 432

Parcel ID 7788-88-0405

ROAD 3, LL

C

MG LE

WIS

TO

WN

Less D.B. 664, P

G. 609

12.68 Ac.

D.B. 2958, P

G. 615

Parcel ID 7788-88-7413

95 7

70095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347007.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.











Matc

hline Sta. 5

5+0

0 Sheet 8


Matc

hline Sta. 4

8+0

0 Sheet 6


Matchline Sheet 6C











F

C




Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

7B

7A

Drainage Descr.____

AirPark Rd. Profile_Sheet

Mainline Profile____Sheet

Inv.

Out

= 204.7

6

Inv. In =

204.9

0

In Pl. 12"

Conc. Pip

e

Inv.

Out

= 203.7

5

Inv. In =

203.8

1

In Pl. 15"

CM

P

Gravel

Asphalt

Shrubs (4)


Conc

Asphalt

6"

Crabapple

12"

Gu

m

Sig

n

1 -

Sty.

Met. G

arage

Conc Walk

ShrubW

ell

Sig

n

Shrubs

Well S

hrub

Sig

n

Sig

n

Gravel

Sig

n

Wooded

Wooded

Wooded

#10111

1 - Sty. Fr. Dwl.

Gravel

Ste

ps

Ste

ps

Ste

ps

N 74° 29’ 24" E

43 44

45

46

47

48

49

PL

PL

PL

(140

Yards)

(140

Yards)

PL

PL

IP

+03.9

1

39.4

5’

IP +2

5.74

29.3

2’

IP +27.6134.24’

(Dividin

g Lin

e Location is

Approxim

ate Per Tax

Map)

(8)Shrubs



Exist. R/W Hwy. Project 0802-042-238, M501

Exist. R/W Hwy. Project 0802-042-238, M501

Brush

Brush

Brush

Inv.

Out

= 203.3

9In

v. In =

203.4

1In Pl. 15" C

MP

Shed

Fr.

#10095 1 - Sty. Fr.

Dwl.

For Virginia Power

Variable Width Utility Easement

Asphalt

Asphalt

Shrubs

Trailer #10103

Wooded

Wooded

Tank

T

Eoi

Eoi

Eoi

T5

T7T6T7

T9

T6

Eoi

W7

Tel. P

ed.#1

WV(2)

T14

W/

Gas Test

Station

W/

Gas Test

Station

S

T

Vepco G

H 50

Vepco H

K 88

Tel. P

ed #2

T

T

T

Gas Lin

e

Marker

Tel. P

ed. #1

Gas Lin

e

Marker

WM

Guy

Wire (2)

WM

Tel. P

ed

Guy

Wire

Guy

Wire

Inv.

Out

= 19

9.2

0In Pl. 6

" P

VC Pip

eRim

= 206.3

5In Pl. S

MH

Tele

phone

MH

FH

Vepco H

L 80

WM

Vepco No # (A

bandonded)

Vepco H

K 69

Tel. P

ed # 3

Tel. P

ed # H

H 12

1 F

O

Access Box

Less D.B. 664, PG. 609

12.68 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 615

Parcel ID 7788-88-7413

6 Ac.

D.B. 2144, PG. 354

Parcel ID 7788-88-2167

B

UP12-DP-1

WLD-DP-1

WLD-10

WLD-11

WLD-12

WLD-13

WLD-14

DP-3DP-2

WLD-5

WLD-4WLD-3

WLD-2

WLD-1

WLD-6

WLD-7

WLD-8

WLD-9

WLB-1

WLB-2

WLB-4

WLB-3

WLA-4

WLA-5

WLA-6

WLA-3

WLA-1

WLA-2

WLADP-1


DOMINION LAND AND DEVELPOEMENT PARTNERSHIP

6’ Paved Shoulder

+25.59

40.00’

6’ Paved Shoulder

48

49 5

0

51 PT 51+63.6

2

52

53

54

55

143’ Lt. Turn Lane

+75.09

12’18’

200’ Taper

48

ST 48+75.09

49

50

18’ 12’

205’ Pave

ment

Transitio

n

200’ Taper 325’ Left Turn Lane

Sta. 49+68.85 APR1 Constr. BL

End Const. Air Park Road @

005

008

007

Type 1V 4.4

%

Grade

26’

Mod. C

G-11 Entr. R

eq’d.

FRANCES T. TYLERCHARLES RANDOLPH TYLER &

Less D.B. 661, PG. 832

0.46 Ac.D.B. 223

, PG. 59Parcel ID 7788-8

8-2542

018*

021*

006

004


L = 1,151.83’

PI = 45+94.72

T = 582.93’

R = 3,035.00’40+11.79PC =

51+63.62

W= 0

LR= 104’

DV= 45 MPH

E = 3.1%

PT =

WEST ENGINEERING COMPANY, INCORPORATED

16.87 Ac.

D.B. 506, PG. 743

D.B. 506, PG. 768

Parcel ID 7788-79-7366

Less D.B. 1448, PG. 488

1 �Ac.

W.B. 29, PG. 378

Parcel ID 7788-88-2348

MELINDA TYLER

LLEWELLYN COLEMANMATTIE

COLEMAN &

1.5 Ac.D.B.

249, PG. 43

2Parc

el ID 778

8-88-040

5


Less D.B. 664, PG. 609

12.68 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 615

Parcel ID 7788-88-7413

5 Ac.

D.B. 2144, PG. 354

Parcel ID 7788-89-5191

DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPDOMINION LAND AND

007

Reloc. Air Park Rd. C

onstr. B

L

12’

13’

13’

12’

13’

12’

13’

286.96’ Shift 13’

13’

12’

6’ Paved Should

er

6’ Paved Should

er

6’ Pa

ved S

houlder


PI = 45+16.10

T = 225.74’L = 421.80’R = 478.00’LS IN = LS OUT = 205.00’

42+48.29SC =CS =46+70.09

TS = 40+43.29

DV= 40 MPH

E= 8%

ST = 48+75.09

Reloc. Air Park Rd. Constr. BL

Reloc. Air P

ark

Rd. Constr. B

L

234’

Rt. T

urn Lane

R= 3,043’

R= 3,027’ R= 3,038.46’

R= 3,039’

7-2

2’R

7-1

2’R

100’ Right Turn Lane

Req’d. Median St’d. MS-1

Median Req’d.

St’d. MS-1

F C

CF

F C

FC



Prop. R

W

Prop. R

W

Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Prop. R

W

Pro

p. R

W

Prop. RW

for Entrance

Constr. E

asem

ent

Prop. T

emp.

for Entrance

Easement

Constr.

Prop. Temp.

Prop. RW

for Entra

nceEaseme

ntConstr. Pro

p. Temp.

for SlopesConstr. Eas

ementProp. Temp

.

Type I -1.91%

Grade

24’ St’d. C

G-9

D

Req’d.

Type 111 -6.2

8%

Grade

12’ St’d. C

G-9

D

Req’d.

Delta= 89°18’09.65" Rt.


POT 50+02.02 Airpark Road Constr. BL

Station 48+75.00

Limited Access

End Proposed


POT 10+00.00

10

POT 10+88.83

PO

T 10

+00.0

0

10

11

PO

T 11+6

7.6

0

ENT4917CONN Constr. BL

Begin Const. @ Sta. 10+00.00

ENT4917CONN Constr. BL

End Const. @ Sta. 11+67.60

ENT4917 Constr. BL

End Const. @ Sta. 10+88.83

ENT4917 Constr. BL

Begin Const. @ Sta. 10+33.58

4800203.59

4900205.59

5200203.67

5400201.82

Delta= 89°18’09.65" Rt.



80095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

895

Matc

hline Sta. 5

5+0

0 Sheet 7

Drainage Descr.

Mainline Profile

REFERENCES



REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347008.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.





















F

C



Woolpert Inc.



RW-201, C-501

PE-101,

0095-042-716,






PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr.____

Mainline Profile____Sheet8A

Sign

15" Maple

8" Maple

36" Oak

Sign

Sign

8" Pine

Gravel

Asphalt

Asphalt

Shrubs (3)

Gravel

Ashcake Road

Route 657

Conc Walk

Conc

Walk

Shrubs

8" Maple

18" Pine

Sig

n

10"

Oak

Sig

n

12" Hollys (2)

Shrubs (2)

Shrubs (4)

Shrubs (2)

Conc

Conc. Blocks w/Horiz. 4x4 post

thru them1.5’ Tall Barricade consisting of

Vertical

Brick Landscape Flower Bed Border

24" Maple w/Brick Landscape Border

Sig

n

Sig

n

Wooded

Wooded

Steps

Sig

n

Sign

PI 53

+49.5

6

50 5

1

52

53

Permanent Drainage Easement

IP

+41.41

33.5

9’

22.76’

IP +44.51

Dwl.

1 - Sty. Bl.

Dwl.

1 �- Sty. Br.

Inv. Out = 200.44Inv. In = 200.92In Pl. 12" Conc. Pipe

Inv. Out = 202.15Inv. In = 202.56In Pl. 15" CMP

Gravel

Gravel

Gravel

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Wooded

Sig

n

Signs (2)

Gravel Ent.

In Pl. 15

" Conc. P

ipe

In Pl. 15"

CM Pipe

Tel. M

arker Post

T

TM

H

DE

W6

T3

T

WV(2)

WV(2)

GV(QL C

)

T10

T15

T15

Tel. Ped No #

Tel. Ped # SS

Tel. P

ed # S

S

T

T

Tel. B

ox #

MH 25 on Conc. Pad

S

S

S

S

TT

Tel. Ped #42-2

Tel. Ped #42-2

(a)

(b)(c)

Tel. Fib

er Optic Cabin

et #P

G 28

Elec. M

eter Box

FH

Vepco JI 54

WM

FH

Vepco JL 28

Vepco JL 43

Guy Wire

Vepco JL 24

Guy Wire

WM (2)Test Station

Guy Wire

Water Line Marker

Inv. Out (c) = 196.32

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Inv. (b) = 196.72

In Pl. 4" PVC Pipe

Inv. In (a) = 196.63

Rim = 205.68

In Pl. SMH



WM

Inv. Out = 197.29

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Inv. In = 197.46

Dept. Of Public Util

itiesProject #22145 Ha

nover Co.Stubbed Per Water

& Sewer PlansIn Pl. 8" P

VC PipeRim = 20

5.24In Pl. SMH

Guy

Wire

JL-52

3 Guy Wir

e

5 Ac.D.B. 2144, PG. 354

Parcel ID 7788-89-5191

WLC-1

WLC-2 WLC-3

WLC-4

DOMINION LAND AND DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP

6’ Paved Shoulder

6’ Paved Shoulder

+83.19

21.00’

+83.19

21.00’

+58.93

66.61’

+57.62

283.04’

+75.93

122.85’

L = 18.41’

Rad. = 50’

Rad. = 75’ L

= 61.3

1’

Rad. = 3

50’ L =

58.8

2’

55

56

57

58 P

OT 58+5

7.9

3

143’ Lt. Turn Lane 200’ Taper

End Proj. 0095-042-716, PE-101, C-501 @

Sta. 58+54.66 Lewistown Road Constr. BL

007



Less D.B. 664, PG. 609

12.68 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 615

Parcel ID 7788-88-7413

DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPDOMINION LAND AND

008

13’

13’

8-1

5’R

8-2

50’R

Median Req’d.

St’d. MS-1

CF F

C

C F FC

Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Prop. R

W

Delta= 89°18’09.65" Rt.



5700202.69

95 9

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

0095-042-716 9

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347009.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matc

hlin

e Sta. 5

19+5

0 Sheet 10






DATED 10/04/1956









F

C




Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS


Ramp C Prof._____Sheet 10B

AirPark Rd. Profile_Sheet 10A

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347009.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.





O/

H

Sig

n

I-95 SBL

Conc.

In Pl. E

nd

wall

Inv.

Outf

all = 162.10

Inv. In =

165.8

3

In Pl. 6’

X 6’

Box

Culvert

In Pl. E

nd

wall

Throat

= 17

4.6

5

In Pl. C

onc. Flu

me

Botto

m of Box

Culvert

= 16

5.0

1

Botto

m of

DI Str

ucture =

172.0

2

Rim

= 17

5.5

2

In Pl. DI

Over Box

Culvert

Guardrai

l

SS 50+0

0.0

0

51

52

53

54

(43.82’)

PL

RW

Mon +2

5.0

2

145.2

7’

PL

PL

LC Relocated Branch

P.B. 34, PG. 324

480’ +/- Old Miry Branch Per

Exist. R/W Hwy. Proje

ct 0660-042-163, C

501

6’ Chain Link Fence


(68.19’)

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt E

nt.

Asphalt E

nt.

Ele

v 17

8.9

6

FL

FL

In Pl. M

etal

Grate

In Pl. C

onc.

DI

In Pl. 2

4" C

M

Pip

e

In Pl. 3

6" C

onc. Pip

e

Ele

v 18

3.5

5

Rim

Split Rail Fence

Chain L

ink Fen

ce

Chain Link FenceChain Link Fence

Metal Sign

In Pl. 3

6" C

onc. Pipe

S

S

Inv.

Out = 164.4

6In Pl. 8

" P

VC Pip

eIn

v. In =

164.4

8Rim

= 17

9.8

4

In Pl. S

MH

Inv.

Out = 163.8

1In Pl. 8

" P

VC Pip

eIn

v. In =

163.8

2Rim

= 18

0.9

3

In Pl. S

MH

Guy

Wire

Guy

Wire

Fib

er Optic

Marker #H

H

GG-13

GF-0

5

GF-16

550F4-G

F-2

4

Gas Lin

e

Marker

Ele

v 18

4.8

7In Pl. S

MH

S

Ele

v 19

1.71

In Pl. S

MH

S

In Pl. S

MH

S

Ele

v 18

5.6

4

In Pl. S

MH

S

Ele

v 18

5.6

7

In Pl. S

MH

S

Fib

er Optic

Marker #H

H 3

FT

In Pl. T

ele. V

ault

T

Fib

er Optic Vault

T

#8

T

271-

D

T

FIB-L

OC

T

#271-

A

T

FH

FH

Blo

w

Off

WV

WV

WV

Ele

v 18

4.9

0

Rim

PO

T 20+0

0.0

020

Sta. 20+00.00 APR1 Constr. BL

Begin Const. Air Park Road @

016

513 514

515

516

517

518

519

R = 10,569.00’

L = 2,089.39’

PI = 522+07.66

T = 1,048.11’

511+59.55PC =

PT = 532+48.94

NORTH GAYTON COMPANY

3.04 Ac. More or LessD.B. 1618, PG. 700D.B. 514, PG. 632

Parcel ID 7788-76-4627

N 5° 40’ 27" WN 4° 10’ 54" E

Rte. I-95 Baseline

Prop. 12’ Paved Shoulder

12’

12’

12’

12’

Rte. I-95 Baseline

Guardrail Req’d.

St’d. GR-2

Reloc. Ramp C Constr. BL

F

NORTH GAYTON COMPANY

3.04 Ac. More or LessD.B. 1618, PG. 700D.B. 514, PG. 632

Parcel ID 7788-76-4627

Prop. RW

Access LineProp. Limited

Access Line Station 106+57.20Begin Mod. Limited

PC

Reloc. Ramp C Constr. BLPI = 108+74.29

T = 216.94’L = 433.42’R = 3,834.00’

106+57.35PRC =

110+90.77

DV= 50 MPH

E= 3%

PCC =

L = 335.62’

PI = 104+89.55

T = 167.82’

R = 12,885.48’103+21.73PC =

106+57.35


DV = 70 MPH

E = -2% Lt.

PRC =

101 10

2 103 P

C 10

3+2

1.73

104

105

106 PR

C 10

6+5

7.3

5

107

Curve RPC13PI = 104+89.55

T = 167.82’L = 335.62’R = 12,885.48’

103+21.73PC =PRC =106+57.35


T = 216.94’L = 433.42’R = 3,834.00’

106+57.35PRC =PCC =110+90.77

PC 10

+00.0

010

11

NBEP Constr. BL

POC Sta. 518+53.31 Rte. I-95 Baseline (57.01’ Rt.)

PC Sta. 10+00.00 NBEP Constr. BL

Begin NB Rte 1-95 Overlay @

POC Sta. 518+53.31 Rte. I-95 Baseline (69.01’ Rt.)

PRC Sta. 106+57.35 RPC Constr. BL

Begin Const. Reloc. Ramp C @

10700

190.7

1

95 10

100095-042-716

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347010.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.











0

SCALE

25’ 50’



Matchline Sta. 112+25 Sheet 11Matchline Sta. 524+25

Sheet 11

Matchline Sta. 519+50 Sheet 9ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY






DATED 10/04/1956






F

C




Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS


Rp. C Profile______Sheet 10B

AirPark Rd Profile_Sheet 10A

Air Park Road

Route 809

I-95

NB

L

I-95 S

BL

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Conc.

Pole

Shed

Wooded

Sign

N 09° 26’ 49"

W

55

56

57

58

59

PL

PL

Pipe +15.32

362.72’

IP +39.15

142.30’

150.19’RW Mon +73.39

D. B. 16

18, P

G. 700

Varia

ble

Width Utility Ease

ment

P.B. 34, P

G. 324

480’ +/-

Old

Mir

y Branch Per

PL

PL

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0660-0

42-163, C

501

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0660-0

42-163, C

501

Wooded

Scattered Trees

Asphalt

Double Guardrail

Asphalt

Gravel

Gravel

6’ Chain Link Fen

ce

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

Wooded

R/W Mon.

Elec. Meter

E

Tel. Vault

Elec. Box

WV(2)

Elec. Box (2)

P/P No#

EE

W/Gas Test Station

T19

T

T

S

S

S

Gas Line Marker Post

(a)

(b)

(c)

S

Camera LP

Inv. Out = 166.45In Pl. 8" C. I. PipeInv. In = 166.49Rim = 171.89In Pl. SMH

Inv. Out = 166.22In Pl. 8" C. I. PipeInv. In = 166.26Rim = 172.10In Pl. SMH

PP No # w/Elec. Meter

Vepco #GG 09

Vepco #FH 95

Tel. Ped # 7

Tel. Ped # 6

Inv. Out = 165.54In Pl. 8" PVC PipeInv. In = 165.56Rim = 179.16

In Pl. SMH

FH

Guy Wire

Guy Wire

#7T

3.0

4

Ac. M

ore or Less

D.B. 16

18, P

G. 700

D.B. 514, P

G. 632

Parcel ID 7788-7

6-4

627

NO

RT

H

GA

YT

ON

CO

MP

AN

Y

21

22

PC 22+32.29

23

24

25

8’ Paved Should

er

016

520

521

522

523

524

001

013

LE

WIS

TO

WN

CO

MM

ER

CE

CE

NT

ER, LLC

17.9

88

Ac.

P.B. 38, P

G. 242

D.B. 2876, P

G. 15

40

Parcel ID 7788-6

7-3

064

4.841 Ac.D.B.

1735, PG. 31

7Parc

el ID 778

8-77-6113

HANOVER COUNTY

GA

YT

ON

CO

MP

AN

YN

OR

TH

Ra

mp C

Constr. B

L


onstr. B

L

R

= 1,300.0

0’

PI =

30+5

1.23

T

= 818.9

4’

L =

1,461.59’

22

+32.2

9P

C =

36+9

3.8

9

DV=

40

MP

H

E=

5.1

%

PT

=

N 0° 48’ 11"

W

N 5° 40’ 27"

W

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

12’ 12’

12’ Paved Should

er

4’ Paved Should

er

75’ Taper

6’ Paved Should

er

6’ Paved Should

er

R

= 10,5

69.0

0’

L =

2,0

89.3

9’

PI =

522

+07.6

6

T

= 1,048.11’

511+5

9.5

5P

C =

PT

=532

+48.9

4

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline


onstr. B

L



St’d.

GR-2

Guardrail R

eq’d.

St’d.

GR-2

Guardrail R

eq’d.

PT 23+43.08

PI = 22+15.54

Curve RPB6

T = 128.27’

L = 255.81’

R = 1,391.61’

20+87.27PC =

PT = 23+43.08

+47.85

12’

+52.69

19’

CF

FC

CF

FC

Ter

min

al Treatm

ent

Req’d.

St’d.

GR-9

Guardrail

Prop. R

W

Prop. Limited

Access Lin

e

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence Req’d.

16’

+27.69

Ra

mp B

Constr. B

L NO

W

SH

OW

N IN

DE

SIG

N FIL

EF

OR

TH

E I-95

NB

LA

NE

SP

ROP. E

P’S

&

PA

VE

D

SH

OU

LD

ER’S

NB

RT

EP

ALIG

NM

EN

T

US

ED

TO S

ET

R=11,036’

Rmp Gore)(South ofPI

Reloc. R

amp C

Constr. B

LPI =

115+17.0

5

T

= 426.2

8’

L =

839.2

0’

R

= 1,939.0

0’

110+9

0.7

7P

CC =

119+2

9.9

7

DV =

50

MP

H

E

= 5.2

%

PT

=

108

109

110

PCC 110+90.77

111

112

R

= 3,8

34.0

0’

PI =

108+7

4.2

9

T

= 216.9

4’

L =

433.4

2’

106+5

7.3

5P

RC =

110+9

0.7

7

Reloc. R

amp C

Constr. B

L

DV =

50

MP

H

E

= 3

%

PC

C =

11

12

13

14

15

NB

EP

Constr. B

L

POC Sta. 5

24+75.00 Rte

. I-95 Ba

seline (5

9.04’ Lt.)

PC Sta. 10

+00.00

SBEP Const

r. BL

Begin S

B Rte 1-

95 Over

lay @

10900

191.73

11100

202.59

2400

201.22

177.9

8178.1

0

95 11

110095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347011.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matchli

ne Sta. 5

28+50

Sheet 12

Matchlin

e Sheet 12





Matchline

Sta. 524

+25 Shee

t 10

Matchline

Sheet 12

Matchline

Sta. 18

+00

Sheet 4

C

1.544

Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-3

258

HOP

KIN

S

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S, II, LLC

015

015

014






DATED 10/04/1956






F

C







Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS


Rp. C Profile_______Sheet 11A

AirPark Rd Profile_Sheet 11A

In Pl. Underdrain

15" Pin

e

15" Pin

e

Sign

Sign

Woo

ded

I-95 S

BL

I-95

NB

L

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Sign

Inv. Outfall = 191.03Inv. Out = 191.57In Pl. 18" Conc. PipeIn Pl. Endwall

Conc. F

lume

Wooded

Sign

PostDelineator

Sign

Dense

Woods

Post

Post

60

61

62

(42.09’)

(42.87’)

A

(13.60’)

PL

(48.31’)

PL

10’ Per

manent Sanitary S

ewer E

asem

ent

D.B. 1114, P

G. 57

IP +30.69

188.67’

232.18’ IP +37.03IP +

49.48 22

7.13’

IP

+51.76

232.3

9’

Flat Iron Bent +51.59

232.67’

Axle Bent +15.62

206.06’

IP +73.68

434.90’

138.50’RW Mon +69.24

RW Mon Disturbed +47.23

192.94’

D. B. 16

18, P

G. 700

Varia

ble

Width Utility Ease

ment

D. B. 16

06, P

G. 449

Varia

ble

Width Utility Easement

193.11

194.49

195.11

192.98

191.97

191.72

191.22

190.30

196.75

195.09

198.17

PL

PL

PL

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0660-0

42-163, C

501

Exist. R/

W

Hwy. Project 0660-0

42-163, C

501

Wooded

Overla

p

Area

Possible Deed

During SurveyNo Evidence Found

D.B. 1114, PG. 57"Burial Grounds" Approximate Limits of

D.B. 283, PG. 373

VEPCO Easement of Unspecified Width

Reflector

Reflector

Reflector

Double Guardrail

Gravel

Gravel

Asphalt

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

4’

Wove

n

Wire Fence

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

Sign

WV

T

TMH(QL C)

T18

T

S

S

S

Inv. Out = 184.28 In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe Inv. In = 184.31 Rim = 200.21 In Pl. SMH


Vepco FH 99

FH

Guy Wire


A

0.9

565

Ac.

P.B. 25, P

G. 10

9W.B. 7, P

G. 365

CIVIL B

OO

K 14, P

G. 13

82

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-4

075

HA

NO

VE

R

CO

UN

TY

300’ Taper

8’ P

aved Shoulder

PI = 19+11.32

T = 159.42’

L = 316.80’

R = 1,145.92’

17+51.90PC =

20+68.71

25

26

27

28

PI = 30+51.23

T = 818.94’

L = 1,461.59’

R = 1,300.00’

22+32.29PC =

36+93.89

DV= 40 MPH

E= 5.1%

PT =

16’

4’ Paved Should

er

014

013

001

1.544

Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-3

258

HOP

KIN

S P

ROP

ER

TIE

S, II, LLC

015

1.544

Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-3

258

HOP

KIN

S

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S, II, LLC

017*

525

526

527

013

0.063 Ac.

P.B. 39, PG. 468D.B. 2966, PG. 708

Parcel ID 7788-77-2175

HOPKINS PROPERTIES, II, LLC

017*A

LE

WIS

TO

WN

CO

MM

ER

CE

CE

NT

ER, LLC

17.9

88

Ac.

P.B. 38, P

G. 242

D.B. 2876, P

G. 15

40

Parcel ID 7788-6

7-3

064

4.8

41

Ac.

D.B. 17

35, P

G. 317

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-6

113

HA

NO

VE

R

CO

UN

TY

4.8

41

Ac.

D.B. 17

35, P

G. 317

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-6

113

HA

NO

VE

R

CO

UN

TY

016

GA

YT

ON

CO

MP

AN

YN

OR

TH

3.0

4

Ac. M

ore or Less

D.B. 16

18, P

G. 700

D.B. 514, P

G. 632

Parcel ID 7788-7

6-4

627

N 0° 48’ 11"

W

Ra

mp C

Constr. B

L


onstr. B

L

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

PI = 23+04.72

T = 704.72’

L = 1,407.65’

R = 11,435.30’

16+00.00PC =

30+07.65

12’ Paved Should

er

8’ Paved Should

er

6’ Paved Should

er

6’ Paved Should

er

Ramp B Constr. BL

DV = 50 MPH

E = 7.2%

PT =



R = 10,569.00’L = 2,089.39’

PI = 522+07.66

T = 1,048.11’

511+59.55PC =

PT =532+48.94

Rte. I-95 Baseline

Guardrail R

eq’d.

St’d.

GR-2

Guardrail R

eq’d.

St’d.

GR-2

Ter

min

al Treatm

ent

Req’d.

St’d.

GR-9

Guardrail

PT =

Curve RPB6

PI = 22+15.54

T = 128.27’

L = 255.81’

R = 1,391.61’

20+87.27PC =

PT =23+43.08

18

19

20

PT 20

+68.71

PC 20

+87.27

21

22

23

4’ P

aved Shoulder

8’ P

aved Shoulder

FC

CF

FC

CF

FC

C

CF

F

F

C

Guardrail R

eq’d.

St’d.

GR-2

Prop. R

W

Prop. Limited

Access Lin

e

St’d. FE-W

1 Fence R

eq’d.

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence Req’d.

Prop. R/

W

& Limited Access Line

Prop. R/

W

&

Limited

Access Line

Acquisitio

n Lin

e

Prop.

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence Req’d.

Lin

e Station 23+0

0Limited

Access

End

Mod.

12’

+67.85

Ra

mp B Spur Constr. B

L

PI = 20+27.09

T = 233.95’

L = 461.69’

R = 1,158.53’

17+93.14PC =

PT = 22+54.83

Ramp B Spur Constr. BL

PC 17+93

.14

18

19

20

21

22

PT

Sta. 2

0+71.3

8 RPB

Constr. BL

Ramp B O

utside S

hldr. C

onstr. @

End

Const. R

amp

B &

Conti

nue

POT Sta. 52

3+75.00 Rte. I-9

5 BL

(72.27’ Lt.)

PT Sta. 22

+54.83 R

PB Sp

ur C

onstr. B

L

POC Sta. 2

2+57.11

RPB Co

nstr. BL

End

Outsi

de S

hldr. C

onst. Ra

mp B @

420’ Transitio

n

NO

W

SH

OW

N IN

DE

SIG

N FIL

E

FO

R

TH

E I-95

NB

LA

NE

S

PR

OP. E

P’S

& P

AVE

D S

HO

ULD

ER’S

NB

RT

EP

ALIG

NM

EN

T

US

ED

TO S

ET

R=11,036’

Curve)(Entire PI

113

114

115

110+90.77


PI = 115+17.05

T = 426.28’

L = 839.20’

R = 1,939.00’

PCC =

119+29.97

DV = 50 MPH

E = 5.2%

PT =

12’ Paved Should

er

PC 10+00.00

10

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

Curve NBEP2

PI = 17+07.31

T = 707.31’

L = 1,412.69’

R = 11,036.00’

10+00.00PC =

PT =24+12.69

SB

EP

Constr. B

L

NB

EP

Constr. B

L

SB

EP

Constr. B

L

POC Sta. 52

4+75.0

0 Rte. I-95 B

aseli

ne (59.04’ Lt.)

PC Sta. 10

+00.00 S

BEP Co

nstr.

BL

Begin S

B Rte 1-95 O

verlay @

11300

201.86

11500

198.84

1925

201.84

2600

199.73

75’ - 6

x 6 Box Culver

t

80’ - 6

x 6 Box Culvert

178.

10

178.2

179.00

1%

179.45

180.20

1%

SWM

BASIN

BASIN/

TEMP SEDI

MENT

204.9

9

202.3

6

200.3

3

95 12

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

0095-042-716 12

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716, VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347012.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.











REFERENCES





Matchlin

e Sta. 115

+50 Sheet 11

Matchlin

e Sta. 2

8+2

5 Sheet 11


Matc

hlin

e Sta. 3

3+5

0 Sheet 13

Matc

hlin

e Sta. 12

1+50 Sheet 12

C

Matchline She

et 4C

Matc

hline Sheet 11

Matchline Sh

eet 12

C

0.063 Ac.P.B. 39, PG. 468

D.B. 2966, PG. 708Parcel ID 7788-77-2175


017*

1.262 Ac.

D.B. 1617, PG. 421

Parcel ID 7788-77-8389

HANOVER COUNTY

011






DATED 10/04/1956






F

C







Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr.____

Ramp C Profile____Sheet 12B

Airpark Rd. Profile_Sheet 12A

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347012.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.





Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Conc. Flume

(a)

(c)

Soil

Ent.

PI 64

+04.09

63

64

65

PL

PLPL

PL

PL

181.15’

IP +

70.17

178.84’

IP +

13.07

IP +42.61 29

5.65’

IP +71.66 52

4.65’

= 3

°04’44

" Lt.

(31.9

6’)

(61.07’)

(52.42’)

(24.71’)

D.B. 18

10, PG.

408

Cemetery

D. B. 16

06, P

G. 456

16’

Wide

Utility E

asem

ent

D. B. 16

02, P

G. 19

5


asem

ent

218.76’

RW

Mon +3

3.39

620.27’

IP +8

3.80

196.39

196.07

196.31

191.8

4

189.62

186.40

182.07

182.09

185.98

182.53

181.6

2181.4

4

181.0

7 181.6

4

Wooded

Wooded

Woo

ded

Inv. O

utfall = 18

5.63

In Pl. (c)

Out

= 186.30

In Pl. 3

6" Co

nc. Pipe

Inv. (b) In

= 186.30

In Pl. 2

4" CMP

Inv. (a) In = 18

6.45

Rim

= 191.

50

In Pl. DI

In Pl. O

ut = 19

1.89 (Filled w/D

ebris)

Inv. In

= 191.

75

In Pl. 18

" Conc. Pipe

D.B. 283, P

G. 373

VEP

CO Easem

ent of Unspecified

Width

D.B. 2

83, P

G. 37

3

VEPCO

Ease

ment

of U

nspecified Width

Mainline has

Fallen in Ditc

h

is S

eparated Fro

m

End

wall w/E

nd of

Pipe

Brush

Woo

ded

Double Guardrail

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

Brush

Brush

Graves in this

Area

Unabl

e to L

ocate

Actual

Eoi

T17

Tel. Pe

d. #5

T

S

Tel.

MH

Tel. Fiber

Optic M

arker #3

FP

Tel. Fiber

Optic M

arker #H

H121

Vepc

o No #

Brace

Pole

Vepc

o #FJ8

0

Next Structure N

ot F

ound

Inv. Out =

190.27

In Pl.

8" P

VC Pipe

Inv. In = 19

0.47

Rim = 196.32

In Pl. SM

H

Vep

co

#73772

Guy

Wire

Inv. O

ut =

185.4

3

In Pl. 8" P

VC Pipe

Inv. In

= 185.52

In Pl. 8" P

VC Pipe

Previou

s Structure N

ot Fo

und

Rim

= 197.19

In Pl. S

MH

1.544

Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-3

258

4.8

41

Ac.

D.B. 17

35, P

G. 317

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-6

113

HOP

KIN

S P

ROP

ER

TIE

S, II, LLC HA

NO

VE

R

CO

UN

TY

29

30

31

32

33

4’ Paved S

houlder

8’ Paved S

houlder

4’ Paved S

houlder

8’ Paved S

houlder

015

011

012

1.544 A

c.

P.B. 3

9, P

G. 468

D.B. 2

966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7

788-77-325

8

HOPKI

NS P

ROPERTI

ES, II, L

LC

015

528

529

530

013

1.544 Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-77-3

258

HOP

KIN

S PR

OPERTIE

S, II, LL

C

017*

009

PI = 30+51.23

T = 818.94’

L = 1,461.59’

R = 1,300.00’

22+32.29PC =

36+93.89

DV= 40 MPH

E= 5.1%

PT =

T = 454.11’

L = 907.68’

R = 10,625.00’

21+00.00PC =

30+07.68

PI = 522+07.66

T = 1,048.11’

L = 2,089.39’

R = 10,569.00’

511+59.55PC =

PT = 532+48.94

1.262 Ac.

D.B. 1617, PG. 421

Parcel ID 7788-77-8389

HANOVER COUNTY

2.615 Ac.

D.B. 1810, PG. 408

Parcel ID 7788-77-8389

HANOVER COUNTY

4.841 Ac.

D.B. 1735, PG. 317

Parcel ID 7788-77-6113

HANOVER COUNTY

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


009

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


012

013

013

4.841 Ac.

D.B. 1735, PG. 317

7788-77-6113

Parcel ID

COUNTY

HANOVER

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

Reloc. Air P

ark R

d. Constr.

BL

535.81’ T

aper

200’ Taper

16’

12’

12’

6’ Pa

ved S

houlder

6’ Pa

ved S

houlder

Rte. I-95 Baseline

PI = 25+54.11



Guardr

ail Req

’d.

St’d. G

R-2

St’d. G

R-2

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

Reloc. R

amp

C Co

nstr. B

L

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

St’d. G

R-2

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

St’d. G

R-2

PT =

DV = 50 MPH

E = 7.2%

PT =

FC

CF

C F

FC

C F

FC

FC

F C

St’d.

GR-11

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

Terminal Req’d.St’d. GR-11 Guardrail

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

St’d.

GR-11

Prop. R

W

Prop. R

W

Prop. R

W

Prop. R

W &

Limited

Access Line

Prop. R

W &

Limited

Access Line

Prop. Limite

d Access Line

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence R

eq’d.

St’d. F

E-W1 F

ence R

eq’d.

NO

W S

HO

WN IN

DESIG

N FIL

E

FO

R

TH

E I-95

NB

LA

NES

PR

OP. E

P’S

& P

AVE

D S

HO

ULD

ER’S

NB

RT

EP

ALIG

NM

ENT

US

ED

TO S

ET

116

117

118

119

PT 119

+29.97

120

121

110+90.77


PI = 115+17.05

T = 426.28’

L = 839.20’

R = 1,939.00’

PCC =

119+29.97

DV = 50 MPH

E = 5.2%

PT =


15

T = 427.26’

R = 11,616.00’

10+00.00

18+54.13

19

20

21SB

EP

Constr. B

L

NB

EP

Constr. B

L

11650187.21

11700205.11

11833204.12

11900203.82

11962205.5112100199.36

2900184.13

3100199.47

3300197.37

PC-SB-53000

198.09

12-04

12-05

4’ x 4’ B

OX

CULVE

RT

4’ x 4’ B

OX

CULVE

RT

TBR

TBR

TBR

95 12

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

0095-042-716 12

RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716, VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347012.dgn


12/12/2013

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.











REFERENCES





Matchlin

e Sta. 115

+50 Sheet 11

Matchlin

e Sta. 2

8+2

5 Sheet 11


Matc

hlin

e Sta. 3

3+5

0 Sheet 13

Matc

hlin

e Sta. 12

1+50 Sheet 12

C

Matchline She

et 4C

Matc

hline Sheet 11

Matchline Sh

eet 12

C

LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAYDATED 10/04/1956






F

C





Denotes slope correction

Jason Henry, P.E. (804) 786-5975 (Central Office)


DESIGN BY

SURVEYED BY, DATE Woolpert Inc., 8/13/10

SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE THE SPECTRA GROUP INC, 8/10/10




R/W Sheet________Sheet 12RW

SWM Pond Detail_____

Ramp C Profile____Sheet 12B

Air Park Rd Profile_Sheet 12A

Control Plan_______Sheet 12E

Erosion and Sediment

Data_______ Sheets 1E-1E(4)

Constr. Alignment

AIP

TBR

RP



place in accordance with St’d. PP-1.Existing Drainage Item to be Abandoned in




Plans____________20 Series

Utility Adjustment

Signal Plans_______19 Series

Markings__________18 Series

Sign & Pavement

Profiles___________17 Series

Storm Sewer

Drainage Descr.____16 Series

Entr. Profiles_____Sheet 15A

7/30/13

9/19/13

10/10/13

10/11/1311/22/13

xxx

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Asphalt

Conc. Flume

(a)

(c)

Soil

Ent.

PI 64

+04.09

63

64

65

PL

PLPL

PL

PL

181.15’

IP +

70.17

178.84’

IP +

13.07

IP +42.61 29

5.65’

IP +71.66 52

4.65’

= 3

°04’44

" Lt.

(31.9

6’)

(61.07’)

(52.42’)

(24.71’)

D.B. 18

10, PG.

408

Cemetery

D. B. 16

06, P

G. 456

16’

Wide

Utility E

asem

ent

D. B. 16

02, P

G. 19

5


asem

ent

218.76’

RW

Mon +3

3.39

620.27’

IP +8

3.80

196.39

196.07

196.31

191.8

4

189.62

186.40

182.07

182.09

185.98

182.53

181.6

2181.4

4

181.0

7 181.6

4

Wooded

Wooded

Woo

ded

Inv. O

utfall = 18

5.63

In Pl. (c)

Out

= 186.30

In Pl. 3

6" Co

nc. Pipe

Inv. (b) In

= 186.30

In Pl. 2

4" CMP

Inv. (a) In = 18

6.45

Rim

= 191.

50

In Pl. DI

In Pl. O

ut = 19

1.89 (Filled w/D

ebris)

Inv. In

= 191.

75

In Pl. 18

" Conc. Pipe

D.B. 283, P

G. 373

VEP

CO Easem

ent of Unspecified

Width

D.B. 2

83, P

G. 37

3

VEPCO

Ease

ment

of U

nspecified Width

Mainline has

Fallen in Ditc

h

is S

eparated Fro

m

End

wall w/E

nd of

Pipe

Brush

Woo

ded

Double Guardrail

4’

Woven

Wire Fence

Brush

Brush

Graves in this

Area

Unabl

e to L

ocate

Actual

Approx. L

ocation

Of Exist. Limited

Access

Eoi

T17

Tel. Ped. #5

T

S

Tel. MH

Tel. Fiber Optic Marker #3FP

Tel. Fiber Optic Marker #HH121

Vepco No #

Brace Pole

Vepco #FJ80

Vep

co

#73772

Guy Wire

Inv. Out = 185.43

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Inv. In = 185.52

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Previous Structure Inaccessible

Rim = 197.19

In Pl. SMH

Next Structure Inaccessible

Inv.

Out = 190.27

In Pl. 8" PVC Pipe

Inv.

In = 190.47

Rim = 196.32

In Pl. SMH

S

Unable To Open

Inaccessible

Rim = 192.14

In Pl. SM

H

1.544

Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-3

258

4.8

41

Ac.

D.B. 17

35, P

G. 317

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-6

113

1.544 Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-77-3

258

HOP

KIN

S PR

OPERTIE

S, II, LL

C

1.262 Ac.

D.B. 1617, PG. 421

Parcel ID 7788-77-7353

HANOVER COUNTY

2.615 Ac.

D.B. 1810, PG. 408

Parcel ID 7788-77-8389

HANOVER COUNTY

4.841 Ac.

D.B. 1735, PG. 317

Parcel ID 7788-77-6113

HANOVER COUNTY

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


4.841 Ac.

D.B. 1735, PG. 317

7788-77-6113

Parcel ID

COUNTY

HANOVER

0.063 Ac.

P.B. 39, PG. 468

D.B. 2966, PG. 708

Parcel ID 7788-77-2175


HOP

KIN

S P

ROP

ER

TIE

S, II, LLC HA

NO

VE

R

CO

UN

TY

29

30

31

32

33

4’ Paved S

houlder

8’ Paved S

houlder

4’ Paved S

houlder

8’ Paved S

houlder

528

529

530

PI = 30+51.23

T = 818.94’

L = 1,461.59’

R = 1,300.00’

22+32.29PC =

36+93.89

T = 454.11’

L = 907.68’

R = 10,625.00’

21+00.00PC =

30+07.68

PI = 522+07.66

T = 1,048.11’

L = 2,089.39’

R = 10,569.00’

511+59.55PC =

PT = 532+48.94

Rte. I-9

5

Baseline

Reloc. Air P

ark R

d. Constr.

BL

536.49’ T

aper

200’ Taper

16’

12’

12’

6’ Pa

ved S

houlder

6’ Pa

ved S

houlder

Rte. I-95 Baseline

PI = 25+54.11



Guardr

ail Req

’d.

St’d. G

R-2

St’d. G

R-2

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

Reloc. R

amp

C Co

nstr. B

L

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

St’d. G

R-2

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

St’d. G

R-2

PT =

St’d.

GR-11

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

Guar

drail R

eq’d.

St’d.

GR-11

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence R

eq’d.

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence R

eq’d.

116

117

118

119

PT 119

+29.97

120

121

110+90.77


PI = 115+17.05

T = 426.28’

L = 839.20’

R = 1,939.00’

PCC =

119+29.97


19

20

21

SB

EP

Constr. B

L

NB

EP

Constr. B

L

15

St’d. U

D-4 Req’d.

St’d. U

D-4 Req’d.

St’d. UD-

4 Re

q’d.

St’d. U

D-4

Req’d.

St’d. UD-4

Req’d.

+19.88

+22.73

Prop. R

W

Prop. R

W

Prop. R

W

Prop. Limite

d Access Line

Limited

Access Line

St’d. UD-

4 Re

q’d.

St’d. UD-

4 Re

q’d.


DV = 50 MPH

E = 6.5%

PT =

LR= See Profile SheetDV = 50 MPH

E = 5.2%

PT =


DV= 40 MPH

E= 5.1%

PT =

FE-4, Ty

pe II R

eq’d.

St’d.

Water Gate

CF

CF

F C

Prop. Acquisition Line

Prop. R

W

CF

FC

FC

Curve DITCH-1

PI = 200+84.76T = 51.71’

L = 93.50’

R = 88.00’200+33.05

PC =PT =201+26.55

POT 200+00.00

200

PC 20

0+33.05

201

PT 201+26.55

202

PC 20

2+23.46

Ditc

h

Guardr

ail Req

’d.

St’d. G

R-7

Guardrai

l Req’d.

St’d. GR-7

+4.8

6%

Grade

Req’d. T

ype I

16’ St’d. P

E-1

+3.64%

Grade

16’ Typ

e I

St’d. GR-2

Guardrail

Req’d.

Do Not Distrurb

POT 10+00.00

10

11

POT 9+7

5.0

0

10

POT 10

+77.0

0

11

13BH-0

01

13BH-0

02

13BH-0

03

13BH-0

04

011

011

011

011

011

015

011

009

009

015

015

and Dominion Power Easement

Prop. Perm. VDOT Utilityan

d Dominion

Pow

er E

asem

ent

Prop. Per

m. V

DOT Utility

and Do

minion

Power E

asement

Prop. P

erm. VDOT

Utility

RW PLANS

0095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

95RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347012c.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matchline

Sheet 5

12C

12C

Matc

hlin

e Sheet 6

C


Matchline

Sheet 6

Matchline Sheet 5

Matc

hlin

e Sheet 4

C

Matchline Sh

eet 12

Matc

hlin

e Sta. 12

1+50 Sheet 12

Matchline Sheet 13







Note :Dot - dashed lines denote Permanent Easements.




Note :Dot - dot - dashed lines denote Temporary Easements.



F

C



Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr.____

Rp. C Profile______Sheet 12D

Inv. O

ut = 19

7.54

Inv. In = 19

8.02

In Pl. 12" C

MP

Inv.

Out

= 203.6

6

Inv. In =

203.8

4

In Pl. 12"

Conc. Pip

e

Inv. Out = 2

02.40

Inv. In

= 202.66

In Pl. 12" C

onc. Pipe

Mtl P

ost

Mixed Small Pines & Cedars

Cut

Over Area S

mall V

ario

us Trees

Wooded

Sig

n

PL

PL

IP

Bent

+48.7

9

207.0

5’

For Virgi

nia Power

Variable W

idth Ease

ment

199.96

200.65

199.87 200.64


Exposed Asphalt

Rough Edge of

Wooded

for Bell Atlantic9.842’ Wide Utility Easement

Woo

ded

Woo

ded

Woo

ded

Brush

Mixed Small Pines & Cedars

Brush

Brush2

384.2

7’

RM-2

+49.94

352.6

8’

RM-2

+95.97

192.6

6’

RM-2 +2

5.8

9

190.6

3’

RM-2 +5

1.15

WV

WV

Water

Marker Post

T2

T2

T2

WCOWater Monitor Station #10137

Inv. O

ut = 191.8

5

In Pl. 8" P

VC Pipe

Inv. In = 191.8

5

Rim = 203.43

In Pl. S

MH

Vepc

o #FJ7

7

Vepco #F

K90

FH

Vepco #G

K52

Guy

Wire

Guy

Wire

Less D.B. 784, PG. 675

Less D.B. 1400, PG. 796

2.5 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 619

Parcel ID 7788-78-5271

6.0 +/-

Ac.

D.B. 505, P

G. 10

D.B. 14

00, P

G. 799

D.B. 2818, P

G. 15

3

Parcel ID 7788-7

7-5

706

DP-1

DP-7

STA. 26+00

RAMP C CL

WLE-6

WLF-4

WLF-6

WLF-1

WLF-2

WLF-3

WLF-5

WLF-7

WLE-2

WLE-5

WLE-1

WLE-4

WLE-3


HA

NO

VE

R-L

EWIS

TO

WN-6, LLC 8’

Paved S

houlder

4’ Paved S

houlder

002

009

009

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


1.544 Ac.

P.B. 39, P

G. 468

D.B. 2966, P

G. 708

Parcel ID 7788-77-3

258

HOP

KIN

S PR

OPERTIE

S, II, LL

C

003

009

002


Less D.B. 784, PG. 675

Less D.B. 1400, PG. 796

2.5 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 619

Parcel ID 7788-78-5271


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


Ramp C C

onstr.

BL


535.81’ T

aper

200’ Taper

14’

14’

14’

14’

535.81’ T

aper

478’ D

ual Left Tur

n La

nes

570’ Right Tur

n La

ne

CF

FC

Limited Access Line

Prop. RW &

Prop. R

W

& Li

mited A

ccess

Line

Prop. R

W

& Limited

Access Line

Prop. R

W &

Limited

Access Line

St’d. F

E-W

1 Fence Req’d.

St’d. FE-W

1 Fence R

eq’d.


Prop. A

cquisition Line

122

123

PC 12

3+2

2.73

124

125

126

127


T = 303.04’L = 561.48’R = 602.00’

123+22.73PC =

128+84.21

DV = 45 MPH

E = -8%

PT =

12300201.38

12500199.52

208.31

135’ 6 x 4 B

ox C

ulvert

189.3

5

BERM 199.0

SWM BASIN

BASIN/

TEMP SEDIMENT

185.4

8

187.9

8

130095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

1395RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

Matc

hline Sta. 3

3+5

0 Sheet 12

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347013.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matc

hlin

e Sta. 4

0+5

0 Sheet 14

Matchline Sheet 12C

Matchline Sheet 6C











F

C



Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr._____Airpark Rd. Prof.___Sheet 13A

Dense Woods

PL

PL

PL

(31.9

6’)

Wooded

Wooded

34

35 36

PT 36+9

3.8

9

37

38

39

40

TS 40+4

3.2

9+4

3.2

912’

12’

003

003

009

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


012010*

? Ac.

D.B. ?, PG. ?

Parcel ID ?

??? ???

PI = 30+51.23

T = 818.94’

L = 1,461.59’

R = 1,300.00’

22+32.29PC =

36+93.89

DV= 40 MPH

E= 5.1%

PT =

PI = 45+16.10

T = 225.74’L = 421.80’R = 478.00’LS IN = LS OUT = 205.00’

42+48.29SC =

CS =46+70.09

TS = 40+43.29

DV= 40 MPH

E= 8%

ST = 48+75.09

2.615 Ac.

D.B. 1810, PG. 408

Parcel ID 7788-77-8389

HANOVER COUNTY


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


12’

12’

6’ Paved Shou

lder

6’ Paved Shoulde

r

Reloc. Air Park Rd. Constr. BLReloc. Air Park Rd. Constr. BL

St’d. GR-2 Guardrail Req’d.Terminal Treatment Req’d.



St’d. GR-7 Guardrail St’d. GR-2 Guardrail Re

q’d.

F C

F C

F C

CF

Prop. RW

Prop. RW


Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Prop. R

W

Prop. RW

Prop. R

W &

Limited

Access Line

3500192.27

3681194.37

3700206.41

3789194.91

3800195.40 4000204.32

13-05

4’ x 4’ B

OX CU

LVERT

130095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

1395RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

Matc

hline Sta. 3

3+5

0 Sheet 12








Matc

hlin

e Sta. 4

0+5

0 Sheet 14

Matchline Sheet 12C

Matchline Sheet 6C






F

C




VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347013.dgn


12/12/2013

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.





SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE THE SPECTRA GROUP INC, 8/10/10

Woolpert Inc., 8/13/10







AIP

TBR

RP



Existing Drainage Item to be Abandoned in place in accordance with St’d. PP-1.




7/30/13

R/W Sheet_______Sheet 13RW

SWM Pond Detail____

Air Park Rd Profile_Sheet 13A

Control Plan_______Sheet 13B

Erosion and Sediment

Data_______ Sheets 1E-1E(4)

Constr. Alignment

Plans____________20 Series

Utility Adjustment

Signal Plans_______19 Series

Markings__________18 Series

Sign & Pavement

Profiles___________17 Series

Storm Sewer

Drainage Descr.____16 Series



9/19/13

10/11/1311/22/13

xxx

Dense Woods

PL

PL

PL

(31.9

6’)

Wooded

Wooded

4.007 Ac.

D.B. 1535, PG. 686

Parcel ID 7788-87-0468

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


2.615 Ac.

D.B. 1810, PG. 408

Parcel ID 7788-77-8389

HANOVER COUNTY


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026

6.0 +/- Ac.

D.B. 505, PG. 10

D.B. 1400, PG. 799

D.B. 2818, PG. 153

Parcel ID 7788-77-5706


2.808 Ac.D.B. 1723, PG. 277

Parcel ID 7788-87-3693

1.19 Ac.

D.B. 1535, PG. 686

Parcel ID 7788-87-2505

HANOVER COUNTY

HANOVER COUNTY

HANOVER COUNTY

34

35 36

PT 36+9

3.8

9

37

38

39

40

TS 40+4

3.2

9+4

3.2

912’

12’

PI = 30+51.23

T = 818.94’

L = 1,461.59’

R = 1,300.00’

22+32.29PC =

36+93.89

PI = 45+16.10

T = 225.74’L = 421.80’R = 478.00’LS IN = LS OUT = 205.00’

42+48.29SC =

CS =46+70.09

TS = 40+43.29


12’

12’

6’ Paved Shoulder

6’ Paved Sho

ulder

Reloc. Air Park Rd. Constr. BLReloc. Air Park Rd. Constr. BL

St’d. GR-2 Guardrail Req’d.Terminal Treatment Req’d.



St’d. GR-7 Guardrail St’d. GR-2 Guardra

il Req’d.

Prop. R

W

Prop. RW


Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Prop. R

W

Limited

Access Line

Prop. R

W &

Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Prop. R

W

@ Sta. 35+00.00

End St’d. UD-4

@ Sta. 36+05.00

Begin St’d. UD-4

@ Sta. 34+45.00

End St’d. UD-4

@ Sta. 36+05.00

Begin St’d. UD-4


DV= 40 MPH

E= 5.1%

PT =


DV= 40 MPH

E= 8%

ST = 48+75.09

Proposed Perm. Slope Ease.

Proposed Perm. Slope Ease.

CF

FC

FC

Slope Ease.

Proposed Perm.

13BH-0

05

13BH-0

06

13BH-0

07

002

002

011

009

011

011

011

and Dominion Power Easement

Prop. Perm. VDOT Utility

RW PLANS

0095-042-716

0

SCALE

25’ 50’

95RW-201, C-501

0095-042-716,

Matchlin

e Sta. 4

7+5

0 Sheet 7

Matchline Sta. 4

0+5

0 Sheet 13

REFERENCES



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


d90347014.dgn


12/14/2012

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY


DESIGNED BY

PROJECT SHEET NO.












Matchline

Sheet 6

C

14

14











F

C



Woolpert Inc.








PFI PLANS

Drainage Descr.____Airpark Rd. Prof.__Sheet 14A

Dense

Woods

PL

PL

Less D.B. 14

48, P

G. 4

88

1 �Ac.

W.B. 2

9, P

G. 3

78

Parcel ID

778

8-88-2348

TS 40+4

3.29

41

42

SC 42+4

8.2

9

43

44

45

46

CS 46+7

0.09

47

PI = 45+16.10

T = 225.74’

L = 421.80’

R = 478.00’

LS IN = LS OUT = 205.00’

42+48.29SC =

CS = 46+70.09

TS = 40+43.29

DV= 40 MPH

E= 8%

ST = 48+75.09

6’ Paved

Shoulder

+44.0

0

+44.00

200’

Taper

6’ Paved

Shoulde

r

205’ Pavement Transition

205’ Pavement Transition

003

003

007

007

018*

Less D.B. 1448, PG. 4881 �Ac.

W.B. 29, PG. 378Parcel ID 7788-88-2348MELINDA TYLER


Less D.B. 664, PG. 609

12.68 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 615

Parcel ID 7788-88-7413


Less D.B. 664, PG. 609

12.68 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 615

Parcel ID 7788-88-7413

Less D.B

. 664, PG. 6

0912.68 Ac.D.B.

2958, PG. 6

15

Parcel ID 77

88-88-74

13


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


Less D.B. 665, PG. 177

7.2155 Ac.

D.B. 2958, PG. 623

Parcel ID 7788-88-0026


14.8

9’

14.8

9’

14.8

9’

14.8

9’


Prop. RW

Prop. RW

Prop. A

cquisition Line

4200

205.0

1

4400

205.4

8

4600

205.5

6

Soil Survey Report - Virginia Department of Transportation€¦ · Soil Survey Report 12/17/2012 12/11/2013 11/14/2014 Scott Lewis Alex Taloma Project: 0095-042-716 PPMS: 90347

Documents