Software Project Management Presentation Final

Date: 17-Dec-2016

Software Project ManagementTeam: 7

Team Members

• InitiationProject InitiationDomain AnalysisBusiness Case

• PlanningProject Planning

• ExecutionSRS Software Architecture

• Software Demonstration• Monitoring & Control

Risk ManagementConfiguration ManagementRelease NotesChange ControlTesting Document

• ClosingProject Summary

1/51Contents

Initiation

• Review management• Data Sharing• Idea/Problem discussion• Profile management

2Description

• Researcher can easily get their draft papers reviewed by the related subject experts

• Researcher can share/sell research related data

• Researchers/potential researchers may create both public and private discussion rooms on different topics

3Goals & Outcomes

• SPM Reports• Web Based Tool

4Deliverables

• Researchers• Paper Reviewers• Developers

5Stakeholders

6Budget Summary

Type Sector Breakdown Frequency Amount (BDT)

Opex

Project staffingTotal work hours 420

Daily 63,000/= BDTCost per person per hour

150/= BDT

Logistic

Transport 1,000/= BDT

Ongoing 11,500/= BDTReport Printing 1,500/= BDT

Web hosting 9,000/= BDT

UtilityInternet bills (7

person, 2 months)7,000/=

BDT Ongoing 7,000/=

Miscellaneous Ongoing 2,000/=

CapexLaptop Laptop computers 7 Pcs One time 2,80,000/=

Desktop Desktop computers 3 Pcs One time 1,20,000/=Premises Ongoing 2,40,000/=

Total anticipated costs 7,23,500 /=

• Public and Private Universities• Research Institutes• Medical College• Public Health Research Institutes• Other Non-University Research Institutes

7Target Market

8Market Strategy

9SWOT Analysis Positive Negative

Internal

Strengths Offer research paper review, share research

idea/problem and data sharing in one single platform

Reading authentic, unbiased reviewswith competitive price

Offer research data to share/sell/buy first-mover advantage in the local market Professional reviewers get feedback on them

to enrich their profile. More affordable marketing strategies

Weaknesses Lack of market research data for market

analysis

Lack of marketing knowledge

Limited time to complete the whole project

Limited number of resource

External

Opportunities Number of researchers are increasing build entry barriers for any possible new

competitor. Similar services on the market are not as

reliable or are more expensive to get online with international transaction

Service could be on the market for ideal time

Threats Competitors have a similar Web based

service for research manuscript review Competitors have launched a new

advertising campaign Lack of research fund may mean

researchers will spend less for review service

Execution

• User will be able to post review request and any other user will be able to bid on that.

• Dataset can be shared by all users. • Users can open discussion room and post comment

there.• Users will be able to chat with other users.• There needs to be effective search function and other

functionality. • The system will be highly secured. Any issues related

the payment and privacy will be handled effectively.

10Requirements

11Use Case Diagram (Level 1)

Authentication

Authenticated user Guest user

Review Management

Data Sharing

Discussion

Search

Profile Management

View

12Data Objects

Users- CV, Email, Profile Photo, Short Biography, Social Website, Personal Information, Professional Information, Performance Information

Review Request- Research Domain, Work Overview, Comment, Expertise Tag, Payment, Time Limit

Data Sharing- Description, Dataset, Preview, Payment, Comment, Rating, Tag, Purchase Count

Discussion- Comment, Members, Discussion Type, Creator, Topic, Tag, Votes

13ER Diagram

Review Post Request

Time Limit

Expertise Tag

Comments

Research Domain

Work Overview

Payment

User Profile

Profile Photo

Social Website Personal

Info

Email

CV

Professional Info

Performance Info

Short Biography

Data Sharing

Comments Tag

Preview

Payment

Dataset

Purchase Count

Description

Rating

Discussion

Creator

Members

Tag

Votes

Discussion Type

Comments

Topic

Create

Join

Review

Purchas

• AuthenticatedUser • DiscussionRoom • Payment • Dataset • PersonalInformation • ProfessionalInformaton • PerformanceInformation

14Class List

15Class Diagram

16Identifying Events

Event Initiator Collaboratorsearch posts, datasets, discussions rooms, and researchers

Authenticated User, Guest User

post review request Authenticated User (Researcher)

response to interested review requests

Authenticated User (Reviewer)

Authenticated User (Researcher)

converse one-to-one Authenticated User

send a get request to the dataset owner

Authenticated User ( Researcher)

Authenticated User (Dataset Owner)

create public or private discussion rooms

Authenticated User (Discussion Room Creator)

add users to the discussion Authenticated User ( Discussion Room Creator)

Authenticated User (Non-Member)

maintain profile information Authenticated User

17Sequence Diagram: Posting Review Request

Authenticated user (Review

request poster)System

Posting

Respond to Review

Requests

System

Ready

Authenticated user (Reviewer)

Responding

to request

Converse one to one

Confirm DealReceive

confirmation

Review request

Posted

Post Review

Work

18Context Diagram

ResearchColab

Authenticated User

Guest User

19Archetypes (ResearchColab)

Researchcolab

Review Management

Data Sharing

DiscussionProfile Management

Authentication Search

20Archetypes (Authentication)

Authentication

Registration Access Management

21Archetypes (Profile Mgmt.)

Profile Management

Update Information

Manage Performance Information

22Archetypes (Review Mgmt.)

Review Management

Manage Review Request

PaymentContract Management

23Archetypes (Data Sharing)

Data Sharing

Manage Dataset Sharing

Payment

24DFD (Level 1)

25DFD (Data Sharing)

26Architectural Diagram (Data Sharing)

27Deployment Model

Software Demonstration

Monitoring & Control

• Scheduling Risk• Requirement Risk• Project Management Risk• Product/Technology Risk• Customer Risk• Human Resources & Contractors Risk

28 Risk Identification

• Evaluating The Risk• Making Decision What Should Be Done to

the Risks• Taking Prudent Margins Over Best-Estimate

Assumptions

29 Risk Quantification

• Developing Strategic Options • Determining Actions• Enhancing Opportunities• Reducing Threats

30 Risk Response

31Heat Map

• Tracking Identified Risks• Monitoring Residual Risks• Identifying New Risks• Executing Risk Response Plans• Evaluating Their Effectiveness

32Risk Monitoring and Control

33Human Resource Management

Key: R – Responsible for completing the work A – Accountable for ensuring task completion/sign off C – Consulted before any decisions are made I – Informed of when an action/decision has been made

34Configuration Management

Generate Change Request

Log CR status

Evaluate CR Authorize CR

ImplementCR

35Sample Format for CRChange Request

Project: Researchcolab.com Date: 20/11/2016 Change Requestor: Minhas Kamal Change No: CR002 Change Category (Check all that apply): □ Schedule □ Cost □ Scope □ Requirements/Deliverables

□ Testing/Quality □ Resources Does this Change Affect (Check all that apply): □ Corrective Action □ Preventative Action □ Defect Repair □ Updates

□ Other Describe the Change Being Requested: Discussion rooms can have multiple administrators. Describe the Reason for the Change: To give more user authority to the discussion room Describe all Alternatives Considered: N/A Describe any Technical Changes Required to Implement this Change: N/A Describe Risks to be Considered for this Change: Estimate Resources and Costs Needed to Implement this Change: N/A Describe the Implications to Quality: Disposition: □ Approve □ Reject □ Defer Justification of Approval, Rejection, or Deferral: This requirement change is not too much important & does not add much value to the system.

36Change Log

Configuration Change Log Project: Researchcolab.com Date: 25/11/16 Change No.

Change Type Description of Change

Requestor Date Submitted

Date Approved

Status Comments

CR001 Design Payment should be an independent module, rather than under Data Sharing and Review Request module. Data Sharing and Review Request module should simply use it.

Minhas Kamal

17/11/2016 18/11/2016 Accepted This request was approved to ensure the Ease of use the payment system.

CR002 Requirement Discussion rooms can have multiple administrators.

Minhas Kamal

20/11/2016 21/11/2016 Denied This requirement change is not too much important & does not add much value to the system.

37Release

• About this release• Deliverables• Compatible Products• Change Notes• Bugs and limitations

38Change Control

Generate Change Request

Log CR status

Evaluate CR Authorize CR

ImplementCR

39Change Types

• Scope• Time• Duration • Cost • Resources • Deliverables• Product• Processes• Quality

40CR Status

• Open• Work in progress• In review• Testing• Closed

41Sample Format for CC RequestChange Request

Project: Researchcolab.com Date: 20/11/2016 Change Requestor: Minhas Kamal Change No: CR002 Change Category (Check all that apply): □ Schedule □ Cost □ Scope □ Requirements/Deliverables

□ Testing/Quality □ Resources Does this Change Affect (Check all that apply): □ Corrective Action □ Preventative Action □ Defect Repair □ Updates

□ Other Describe the Change Being Requested: Discussion rooms can have multiple administrators. Describe the Reason for the Change: To give more user authority to the discussion room Describe all Alternatives Considered: N/A Describe any Technical Changes Required to Implement this Change: N/A Describe Risks to be Considered for this Change: Estimate Resources and Costs Needed to Implement this Change: N/A Describe the Implications to Quality: Disposition: □ Approve □ Reject □ Defer Justification of Approval, Rejection, or Deferral: This requirement change is not too much important & does not add much value to the system.

42Change Log

Change Log

Project: Network Upgrade Project Date: 04/01/20xx

Change No.

Change Type

Description of Change

Requestor Date Submitted

Date Approved

Status Comments

CR001 Equipment This change request calls for the purchase of wlan routers.

Minhas Kamal

07/08/16 08/08/16 Denied This request was denied by the change control board because there is not adequate funding available for the purchase of new routers and because the request is outside of the project's scope.

43Testing Types

• Function Testing • User Interface Testing • Data and Dataset Integrity Testing • Security and Access Control Testing • Configuration Testing • Load Testing

44Test Item Pass/Fail Criteria

• Data and Database Integrity Testing Criteria• Function Testing Criteria• User Interface Testing Criteria• Load Testing Criteria• Security and Access Control Testing Criteria• Configuration Testing Criteria

45Functional Testing

46Features to be Tested

• User Registration.• Log in.• Log out.• Review Request Posting.• Biding review request.• Sharing data• Requesting for sharing data• Search

47Sample Test Case

Test Suite ID TS-6Test Case ID TC-6Test Case Name Sharing DataTest Case Summary Authenticated User can share dataRelated Requirements Precondition Must be logged inPrerequisites Test Description 1. Select ‘Share Data option’.

2. Enter title.3. Give description.4. Add expertise tag.5. Add Data File6. Click on ‘Share’ button.

Created by Md Rakib HossainDate of Creation 12 November 2016Executed by Md Rakib HossainDate of Execution 15 November 2016Test Environment OS: Windows 10

Browser: Google Chrome

47Sample Test Case (Cont.)

Step Action Expected System response Pass/Fail Comment1 Click Post review Request Link Review request form passed 2 Give required Data(

Tittle, description, file tag) and click Post button

Successfully shared data passed

3 Give required Data(Blank Tittle, description, file, tag) and click Post button

Tittle is required passed

4 Give required Data(Tittle, blank description, tag) and click Post button

Description is required passed

5 Give required Data(Tittle, description, blank tag) and click Post button

Tag is required passed

6 Give required Data( Tittle, description, invalid file format tag) and click Post button

File format is invalid passed

7 Give required Data( Tittle, description, long size file tag) and click Post button

File size is too large passed

Closing

48Project Deliverables

Planned Deliverable

Actual Deliverable Summary

Project Management Reports.

The team provided the entire project plan. It contains which development process to follow, how to coordinate between team members, which development tools to follow.

This deliverable was completed as planned

SRS & Design document

The analyst team provided the architecture of the software and UX design is described in this report.


Configuration Manual

The documentation team provided with a configuration manual that describes about how to configure the tools and what environment is required for running the software.


Executable code module

The development team has deployed the actual web application to be used.


49Project Schedule

Project Phase Scheduled Completion

Actual Completion Comments

Initiation September 29, 2016 September 29, 2016 Completed on time

Planning October 30, 2016 October 30, 2016 Completed on time

Design November 8, 2016 November 8, 2016 Completed on time

Build November 12, 2016 November 20, 2016 Not Completed on time

Testing November 15, 2016 November 22, 2016 Completed on time

Trial Build/Install November 22, 20xx November 25, 2016 Not Completed on time

Transition to Ops November 22, 2016 November 26, 2016 Not Completed on time

Project Closure November 26, 2016 TBD Progressing on time

50Project Cost

Project Phase Budgeted Cost Actual Cost Comments

• Project staffing 63,000/= BDT 65,000/= BDT Staffing cost were over budget due toSchedule pressure

• Logistic 11,500/= BDT 10000/= BDT Logistics were over budget due to under estimation

• Utility 7,000/=BDT 6000/= BDT Utility costs came in under budget

• Miscellaneous 2,000/=BDT 5000/= BDT Miscellaneous cost was over budget

• Laptop 2,80,000/=BDT 2,80,000/=BDT costs were on budget

• Desktop 1,20,000/=BDT 1,20,000/=BDT costs were on budget

• Premises 2,40,000/=BDT 2,20,000/=BDT costs were on budget

51EVM Chart

THANKS