Tous droits réservés © Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1993 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Document generated on 07/25/2022 3:06 a.m. Sociologie et sociétés Discours et débats autour de la scientificité des entretiens de recherche Discoure and Debates on the Scientific Nature of Research Interviews Jean POUPART Volume 25, Number 2, automne 1993 La construction des données URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/001573ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/001573ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal ISSN 0038-030X (print) 1492-1375 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article POUPART, J. (1993). Discours et débats autour de la scientificité des entretiens de recherche. Sociologie et sociétés, 25(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.7202/001573ar Article abstract This paper deals with the evolution of discourse and debates over the scientific nature of research interviews, emphasizing however qualitative type interviews. Special attention is accorded to the debate over the respective merits of the qualitative interview and the standard interview, to the question of bias in interviewing in general and to the status of data produced by it. This paper attempts to demonstrate that, from the 1970s on, discourse on interviews evolved from a basically positivist conception to a more constructivist one. In this sense, discourse is seen as being socially produced and constructed.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Tous droits réservés © Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1993 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit(including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can beviewed online.https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/
This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal,Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is topromote and disseminate research.https://www.erudit.org/en/
Document generated on 07/25/2022 3:06 a.m.
Sociologie et sociétés
Discours et débats autour de la scientificité des entretiens derechercheDiscoure and Debates on the Scientific Nature of ResearchInterviewsJean POUPART
Volume 25, Number 2, automne 1993La construction des données
URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/001573arDOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/001573ar
See table of contents
Publisher(s)Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal
ISSN0038-030X (print)1492-1375 (digital)
Explore this journal
Cite this articlePOUPART, J. (1993). Discours et débats autour de la scientificité des entretiensde recherche. Sociologie et sociétés, 25(2), 93–110.https://doi.org/10.7202/001573ar
Article abstractThis paper deals with the evolution of discourse and debates over the scientificnature of research interviews, emphasizing however qualitative typeinterviews. Special attention is accorded to the debate over the respectivemerits of the qualitative interview and the standard interview, to the questionof bias in interviewing in general and to the status of data produced by it. Thispaper attempts to demonstrate that, from the 1970s on, discourse on interviewsevolved from a basically positivist conception to a more constructivist one. Inthis sense, discourse is seen as being socially produced and constructed.
Related Documents
