Top Banner
UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGÓGICA EXPERIMENTAL LIBERTADOR INSTITUTO PEDAGÓGICO DE CARACAS DEPARTAMENTO DE IDIOMAS MODERNOS PROGRAMA DE INGLÉS CÁTEDRA DE LINGUISTICA DIDÁCTICA DEL INGLÉS Professor: Nahir Aparicio Participant : Pérez, Caracas, November 2011
4
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sociological View of CLT

UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGÓGICA EXPERIMENTAL LIBERTADORINSTITUTO PEDAGÓGICO DE CARACAS

DEPARTAMENTO DE IDIOMAS MODERNOSPROGRAMA DE INGLÉS

CÁTEDRA DE LINGUISTICADIDÁCTICA DEL INGLÉS

Professor:Nahir Aparicio

Participant:Pérez, Veruska

Caracas, November 2011

Page 2: Sociological View of CLT

•Hymes

•Wilkins

•Van Ek

•Widdowson

•Candlin

•Brumfit

• Johnson and

other British linguists

REPRESENTATIVES

SOME PRINCIPLES

• Language learning is learning to communicate.

• Teachers help learners in any way that motivates them to work

with the language.

• Language is created by the individual often through trial and

error.

• Intrinsic motivation will spring from an interest in what is being

communicated by the language.

• Communicative competence is the desired goal (i.e. the ability to

use the linguistic system effectively and appropriately).

To develop what Hymes

(1972) referred to as

"communicative competence”

Page 3: Sociological View of CLT

Hymes's theory of communicative

competence was a definition of what a speaker

needs to know in order to be communicatively

competent in a speech community. In Hymes's

view, a person who acquires

communicative competence acquires both

knowledge and ability for language use.

Canale and Swain (1980) identified four dimensions:

• Grammatical competence.

• Sociolinguistic competence.

• Discourse competence.

• Strategic competence.

Page 4: Sociological View of CLT

Howatt distinguishes between a "strong" and a "weak"

version of Communicative Language Teaching:

“Using English to learn it”

Advances the claim that language is acquired through

communication.

“Learning to use”

Stresses the importance of providing learners

with opportunities to use their English for

communicative purposes.