Top Banner
Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008
30

Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Sociolinguistics

October 29, 2008

Page 2: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Sociolinguistics: Methods

1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period

of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys and questionnaires 5. Accent Judgment Test 6. Language attitude studies 7. Role-playing 8. Discourse Completion Tests

Page 3: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

6. Language Attitude Studies

How do you conduct language attitude studies?

examine what people think about certain dialects and why they think it

examine what effect these attitudes have on the way people think about the speakers of the dialect

examine what effect these attitudes have on the way people interact with speakers of the dialect

This type of research is sometimes called “folk linguistics”

Page 4: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

social perceptions and dialects

Two types of social perception: Status (we admire these people):intelligence, businesslike, correct, dependable Solidarity (we like these people):friendly, pleasant, funny, similar to you

Do we perceive speakers of some varieties of English as being more intelligent or more friendly?

Page 5: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

background: Preston’s (1992, 1999) research on language attitudes

Tested Northerners (Michiganders) and Southerners (Alabamans) on their perception of northern and southern speech

Participants rate speakers from different states on scales of solidarity and status:

Example:

Politeness

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Language attitude studies

Page 6: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

perceptions of American English

Page 7: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

perceptions of American English 2

Page 8: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

correctness by Michiganders

Page 9: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

correctness by Alabamans

Page 10: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

pleasantness by Michiganders

Page 11: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

pleasantness by Alabamans

Page 12: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

background: results

Who scored highest on status characteristics?

Michigan Who scored highest on solidarity

characteristics?AlabamaIn other words, we tend to admire

speakers of some dialects, but think they are unfriendly. We think speakers of other dialects are friendly, but kind of dumb

Page 13: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

background: child attitude studies

How old are you when you acquire these attitudes?

Rosenthal, 1974

Standard English and African American English speaking children

Interacted with two boxes—one that spoke standard English and one that spoke African American English

Page 14: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

background: child attitude studiesTakingWhich box has nicer

presents?Which box sounds nicer?Which box talks better?Which box do you like

better?Which box do you want to

take your present from?

GivingWhich box wants it

more?Which box needs it

more?Which box sounds

nicer?Which box do you want

to give it to?

Page 15: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

background: child attitude studies

Who did they want to take from?

The Standard English box

Who did they want to give to?

The African American English box

How old were the children?

3-5 years old

Page 16: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

social perception of dialects (David Bowie)Replication of Preston’s work, but with

Californians, Floridians and Utahans

Status: correct, intelligentSolidarity: pleasant, similar to you

States marked in red on the following maps indicate that participants thought this state “very strongly” had this characteristic; pinks and blues indicate that participants thought this state “very strongly” did not have this characteristic

Page 17: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

California

Utah

Florida

1. correct

Page 18: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

California

Utah

Florida

2. intelligent

Page 19: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

California

Utah

Florida

3. pleasant

Page 20: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

California

Utah

Florida

4. similar to you

Page 21: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

conclusions Californians: think they are correct, pleasant

and very intelligent Floridians: think they are correct, intelligent

and pleasant and that no one is like them Utahans: Don’t think they are correct, don’t

think anyone is intelligent and think everyone is pleasant

Utahans display the most linguistic insecurity Californians and Floridians think they score

high on both status and solidarity characteristics

Don’t see as strong north/south prejudice as in eastern U.S.

Page 22: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Sociolinguistics: Methods

1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period

of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys and questionnaires 5. Accent Judgment Test 6. Language attitude studies 7. Role-playing 8. Discourse Completion Tests

Page 23: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Which of the speakers is male? Which is female? How do you know?

M: What kind of salad dressing should I make?K: Oil and vinegar, what else?M: What do you mean “what else”?K: Well, I always make oil and vinegar, but if you want we could try something else.M: Does that mean you don’t like it when I make other dressings?K: No, I like it. Go ahead. Make something else.M: Not if you want oil and vinegar.K: I don’t. Make a yogurt dressing(M. makes a yogurt dressing, tastes it ,and makes a face)K: Isn’t it good?M: I don’t know how to make yogurt dressing.K: Well, if you don’t like it, throw it out.M: Never mind.K: What never mind? It’s just little yogurt.M: You’re making a big deal out of nothing.K: You are!

Page 24: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Conversation Analysis: Some terms

Some definitions:1. Face 2. Power and Solidarity 3. Politeness (directness) 4. Speech Acts5. Floor

solidarity

power

+p, +s

-p, +s

+p, -s

-p, -s

Page 25: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Politeness

Situation Positive (desire to include)

Negative (desire to avoid)

1. Person walks into room and trips

make a joke pretends doesn’t happen

2. Friendliness include person in all activities

allow person to do things on their own

3. Sees someone with zipper undone

tells the person a. ignores

b. tells person later

4. Request includes in activity “Let’s take the garbage out

hedge: “I wonder if you could help out?”

5. Complaint make a joke “you sure are a good housekeeper”

nominalize: “Your poor performance on the exam . . .

Page 26: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Conversation Analysis: Holding the floor

a. P: Your Honor, we request immediate sentencing and waive the probation report.

J: What's his record?P: He has a prior drunk and GTA. Nothing serious. This is just a shoplifting

case. He did enter the K-Mart with the intent to steal. But really all we have here is a petty theft.

J: What do the people have?D: Nothing either way.J: How long has he been in?D: Eighty-three days.

b. D: I wonder how our parents and grandparents thought about Thanksgiving.S: Could we get this off the table?D: Y'know, if they used to do it for the kids or whether they really felt it.P: I'd like to get this off the table.S: It keeps coming back on the table.

Page 27: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Example Speech Act: Compliments

1. Who gets compliments?

2. Who gives compliments?

3. Who evades/deflects/rejects compliments?

4. What do men/women compliment (appearance, possessions, skills?)

Page 28: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Who gives/receives compliments?

Page 29: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Who accepts, rejects and evades compliments?

Page 30: Sociolinguistics October 29, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys.

Compliments and Types of Compliments that vary by Social Distance