Top Banner
Social Thinking Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 Chapter 16, Lecture 1 connections are powerful and can us. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourse ’ remarked the novelist Herman Mel ives are connected by a thousand ble threads.’” - David Myers
16

Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Social ThinkingSocial ThinkingChapter 16, Lecture 1Chapter 16, Lecture 1

“Human connections are powerful and can beperilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselvesalone,’ remarked the novelist Herman Melville.‘Our lives are connected by a thousandinvisible threads.’”

- David Myers

Page 2: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Focuses in Social Psychology

Social psychology scientifically studies how we think about, influence, and

relate to one another.

Page 3: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Social Thinking

Social thinking involves thinking about others, especially when they engage in

doing things that are unexpected.

1. Does his absenteeism signify illness, laziness, or a stressful work atmosphere?

2. Was the horror of 9/11 the work of crazed evil people or ordinary people corrupted by life events?

Page 4: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Attributing Behavior to Persons or to Situations

Attribution Theory: Fritz Heider (1958)

suggested that we have a tendency to give

causal explanations for someone’s behavior,

often by crediting either the situation or

the person’s disposition.

http://ww

w.stedw

ards.edu

Fritz Heider

Page 5: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Attributing Behavior to Persons or to Situations

A teacher may wonder whether a child’s hostility reflects an aggressive personality

(dispositional attribution) or is a reaction to stress or abuse (a situational

attribution).

http://ww

w.bootsnall.org

Dispositions are enduring personality traits. So, if Joe is a

quiet, shy, and introverted child, he is

likely to be like that in a number of situations.

Page 6: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Fundamental Attribution Error

The tendency to overestimate the impact of personal disposition and

underestimate the impact of the situations in analyzing the behaviors of

others leads to the fundamental attribution error.

Take a look at Handout 16-2!!!

Page 7: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Effects of AttributionHow we explain someone’s behavior

affects how we react to it.

Page 8: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Attitudes & Actions

An attitude is a belief and feeling that predisposes a person to respond in a particular

way to objects, other people, and events.

If we believe a person is mean, we may feel dislike for the person and act in an

unfriendly manner.

Page 9: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Attitudes Can Affect Actions

Our attitudes predict our behaviors imperfectly because other factors, including the external

situation, also influence behavior.

The central route to persuasion occurs when interested people focus on the

arguments that are directly related to the issue at hand. In contrast, the

peripheral route to persuasion is characterized by the use of incidental

cues, such as a speaker’s attractiveness.

Page 10: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Actions Can Affect AttitudesNot only do people stand for what they

believe in (attitude), they start believing in what they stand for.

Cooperative actions can lead to mutual liking (beliefs).

D. M

acD

on

ald

/ Ph

oto

Ed

it

Page 11: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Small Request – Large Request

In the Korean War, Chinese communists solicited cooperation from US army

prisoners by asking them to carry out small errands. By complying to small errands they

were likely to comply to larger ones.

Foot-in-the-Door Phenomenon: The tendency for people who have first

agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request.

Page 12: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Role Playing Affects Attitudes

Zimbardo (1972) assigned the roles of guards and prisoners to random students

and found that guards and prisoners developed role- appropriate attitudes.

Orig

inally p

ub

lished

inth

e N

ew

York

er

Ph

illip G

. Zim

bard

o, In

c.

Page 13: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Suppose you had volunteered to participate in a psychology experiment on campus. Upon arrival, you were seated at a table and asked to undertake a series of dull, meaningless tasks for about an hour. Afterward, the experimenter convinced you to extol the virtues of the tasks you had performed by describing them to other potential participants as highly worthwhile, interesting, and educational. You were paid either $1 or $20 to do this. Suppose you were then asked to privately rate your enjoyment of the tasks on a questionnaire. After which amount do you believe your actual enjoyment rating of the tasks would be higher - $1 or $20?

Page 14: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Actions Can Affect Attitudes

Why do actions affect attitudes? One explanation is that when our attitudes and

actions are opposed, we experience tension. This is called cognitive

dissonance.

To relieve ourselves of this tension we bring our attitudes closer to our actions

(Festinger, 1957).

Page 15: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

Cognitive Dissonance

Page 16: Social Thinking Chapter 16, Lecture 1 “Human connections are powerful and can be perilous. Yet ‘we cannot live for ourselves alone,’ remarked the novelist.

“Cruel acts shape the self. But so do acts ofgood will. Act as though you like someone,and you soon will. Changing our behavior canchange how we think about others and how wefeel about ourselves.”

- David Myers

HomeworkRead p.673-691