Top Banner
Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University
26

Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Jan 17, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Social Perspectives on Gender

© 2009, John B. Pryor

Illinois State University

Page 2: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

20 Traits: Male or Female? independent logical neat need for security never cries not emotional objective quite religious tactful worldly

active acts as a leader aggressive aware of others’

feelings direct dominant easily expresses

tender feelings enjoys art & literature gentle

Page 3: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Gender Stereotypes Broverman et a. (1972)

Competency clusterCompetency cluster::

aggressive, direct, aggressive, direct, independent, active, independent, active, not emotional, not emotional, objective, worldly, objective, worldly, logical, dominant, logical, dominant, acts as a leader, acts as a leader, never criesnever cries

warmth-warmth-expressiveness expressiveness cluster:cluster:

gentle, tactful, quite, gentle, tactful, quite, religious, neat, religious, neat, aware of others’ aware of others’ feelings, easily feelings, easily expresses tender expresses tender feelings, enjoys art & feelings, enjoys art & literature, need for literature, need for securitysecurity

Page 4: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Describe a healthy, mature, socially competent

a) male, b) female, or c) adult (sex unspecified)

Healthy women are Healthy women are expected to be expected to be less:less:

independentindependent adventurousadventurous aggressiveaggressive competitivecompetitive

Healthy women are Healthy women are expected to be expected to be more:more:

submissivesubmissive easily influencedeasily influenced excitable in minor excitable in minor

crisescrises conceited about conceited about

their appearancetheir appearance

from Broverman, et al.

Page 5: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Consequences of stereotypes

at work Ideal managers are described as more male-like

(women no longer believe this in the U.S.) Stereotypes of people who earn more money involve

strong increases in positive male qualities (e.g., independence) moderate increases in negative male qualities (e.g., aggressiveness) and overall decreases in female qualities

Employees question the competency of female managers

Female leaders receive more negative non-verbal cues from groups members than men

Page 6: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Equal pay for equal Equal pay for equal work?work?

How far have we come How far have we come to achieving this goal?to achieving this goal?

Page 7: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Women's Earnings in the US as a Percent of Men's Earnings

63.963.963.963.963.963.363.86361.360.7

59.259.358.959.159.957.657.858.258.959.459.5

57.956.658.858.860.258.959.459.760.259.2

61.763.663.764.664.365.266

68.771.6

69.970.871.57271.473.874.273.272.273.3

76.376.675.576.67776.977.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

195119521953195419551956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007

Page 8: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

College-educated women may actually be falling further behind

62% 62%

Page 9: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Gender Wage Gap Comparing USA to Selected European Countries

75.578 78 79 79 81 81 82 83

86 86 87 88 89 9195

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

United States

Ireland

United Kingdom

Austria

Netherlands

FinlandGermany

Luxembourg

SwedenDenmarkSpain Greece FranceBelgium

ItalyPortugal

countries

percent

Data from 2003

Page 10: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Women expect lower salaries-why?

They are aware of reality--they know that earn less

Women expect to take more time off work (e.g. for child rearing)

Women place less importance on job outcomes than men

Women have lower self-confidence in many achievement situations

Page 11: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Gender stereotypes are maintained even when the

evidence is conflicting.

Research by Deaux

Page 12: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Weiner’s Taxonomy

LUCK

TASKDIFFICULTY

ABILITY

EFFORT

EXTERNALINTERNAL

TEMPORARY

STABLE

ATTRIBUTIONS ABOUTPERFORMANCE

Why do womenfail?Why do women succeed?Why do menfail?Why do mensucceed?

“He’s skilled, she’s lucky”Swim & Sanna, 1996

Page 13: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Women generally do not score as high as men on

standardizedtests of math and

science competence.Why?

Page 14: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

The Performance of Women on Masculine-Tasks is Influenced by

Stereotype Threat Stereotype Threat is being concerned about a

negative stereotype of your group. For example, women might be concerned about the stereotype that women are inferior in math.

This concern can lead to distress and distraction when stereotypes are thought to be relevant to performance

This distress can interfere with performance Some women are more conscious of group

membership (I.e., being a woman) than others

Page 15: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Schmader (2003)

Male & Female college students selected who scored 500-700 on quantitative part of SAT

Measured Collective Self-Esteem: e.g., “Being a woman/man is an important part of my self-image.”

Participants told either that their scores on a test would be compared to other students or that males and females would be compared--Gender Relevance Manipulation

Participants took math section of GRE

Page 16: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Gender Identification as a Moderator of Gender Identity Relevance Effects on Women's and Men's Math Performance (Schmader,

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Men Women Men Women

Gender Identity Not Relevant Gender Identity Relevant

Math Test Performance

Low IdentifiedHigh Identified

Only significantMale/femaledifference

Page 17: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

How do women in How do women in leadership roles leadership roles

behave differently behave differently from men?from men?

Page 18: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Leadership Styles of Women and MenFrom Eagly, Johannesen-Schmidt, & Engen (2003)

•Women are more likely than men to be TRANFORMATIONAL LEADERS

-Transformational leaders communicate values, purpose,and importance of organization’s mission-Transformational leaders exhibit optimism & excitementabout goals-Transformational leaders examine new perspectives forsolving problems-Transformational leaders focus on the development andmentoring of followers

•Men are more likely than women to be TRANSACTIONAL or LAISSEZ-FARE LEADERS

Page 19: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

What are the actual gender differences in psychological

variables?

Page 20: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Gender Differences from Meta-Analyses (Hyde,

2007)

Cognitive variables» Mathematics problems solving (M>F)» Mathematics (M>F)» Reading comprehension (F>M)» Mental rotation (M>F)

Communication variables» Self-disclosure (F>M)» Smiling (F>M)

Page 21: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Gender Differences from Meta-Analyses (Hyde,

2007)

Social Personality Variables» Physical aggression (M>F)» Verbal aggression (M>F)» Helping behavior (M>F)» Leadership effectiveness (F>M)» Self-esteem (M>F)» Depression symptoms (F>M)» Attitudes about casual sex (M>F)

Miscellaneous» Throwing velocity (M>F)» Moral reasoning (M>F)

Page 22: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Why do women

and men differ in

theirsocial

behaviors?

Page 23: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Three types of explanations of sex differences (Wood & Eagly,

2002)

Social constructionism - e.g., Eagly’s Social-Role Theory - sex differences are the products of arbitrary socialization experiences

Evolutionary psychology - sex differences are “hard-wired” - the results of evolutionary pressures

Biosocial theory - sex differences are emergent from biological differences (e.g., male size & female capacity to bear children), developmental experiences (e.g., socialization), and cultural factors

Page 24: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Analyses from 185 societies show male/female divisions of labor

Percent of male participation

Predominantly masculine activities: Hunting large land fauna (99.3%)

Quasi-masculine activities:House building (77.4%)

Swing activities:Care of small animals (35.9%)

Quasi-feminine activities:Cooking (8%)

Page 25: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Eagly’s Social-Role Theory ofsex differences in social behavior

Gender-RoleExpectations

Division of LaborBetween the Sexes

Sex-TypedSkills & Beliefs

Sex Differencesin Social Behavior

Page 26: Social Perspectives on Gender © 2009, John B. Pryor Illinois State University.

Analyses from 185 societies show male/female divisions of labor