*Small Exploratory Study* Some differences include: • CLSC students had more activities but lower weekly frequency of recreational activities • CLSC students had slightly smaller networks on average with more authority figures • CLSC students have more variability in their social networks related to both numbers of people and activities Relationship Types Reciprocity Closeness Social Activities Participants • 2 years college experience • Undergraduate students (n=8) • CLSC Students (n=9) Data Collection • Semi-structured interview focused on the past year v Social Network Activities o Location, frequency, purpose, integration v Social Network People o Relation, sex, time known, how met, close, reciprocity Analysis • Descriptive Statistics v Size and composition of network v Number and type of activities What are some of the differences in social networks between students in the CLSC program and their peers? Methods • Limited research exists about the social networks of undergraduate college students • People with intellectual disabilities tend to have smaller less diverse networks than typically developing peers • Social networks are a source of support, protection and friendship • There is a trend toward expanding post-secondary opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities Literature Review Social Network: Defined in terms activities a person participates in and the people they connect with in those activities CLSC: Career Life Studies Certificate program, 2-year certificate program for students with intellectual disabilities, academic and career instruction Terminology Results Research Question Discussion Points Social Network Comparison of College Students with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Undergraduate Peers Samantha Leonard % Undergraduate CLSC Family 15 12 Peers 69 60 Incidental 5 5 Caregiver 0 0 Authority 9 23 Number of People in Networks Number of Activities Results Current Focus: • Size and composition of networks in comparison Future: • Use larger sample • Look at variables that predict long term outcomes • Different types of social networks • Longitudinal analysis Directions for Future Research • University of Delaware Undergraduate Research Program • Stephanie Espie, Graduate Advisor • Laura Eisenman, Faculty Mentor • CLSC Program Acknowledgements Undergraduate CLSC Average 27 20 Range 19-32 7-37 Undergraduate CLSC Average 8 10 Range 8-9 7-20 % Undergraduate CLSC Equal 76 63 Receive 14 9 Give 9 16 Mix 0 6 Undecided 0 2 % Undergraduate CLSC Very Close 55 44 Sort of 33 43 Mix 0 6 Undecided 12 1 % Undergraduate CLSC Weekly 73 41 Monthly 8 10 Occasional 11 35 Annual 8 14
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
*Small Exploratory Study*Some differences include:• CLSC students had more activities but
lower weekly frequency of recreational activities
• CLSC students had slightly smaller networks on average with more authority figures
• CLSC students have more variability in their social networks related to both numbers of people and activities
Relationship Types
Reciprocity
Closeness
Social Activities
Participants• 2 years college experience• Undergraduate students (n=8)• CLSC Students (n=9)
Data Collection• Semi-structured interview focused on
the past yearv Social Network Activitieso Location, frequency, purpose,
integrationv Social Network Peopleo Relation, sex, time known, how
met, close, reciprocityAnalysis• Descriptive Statistics
v Size and composition of networkv Number and type of activities
What are some of the differences in social networks between
students in the CLSC program and their peers?
Methods
• Limited research exists about the social networks of undergraduate college students
• People with intellectual disabilities tend to have smaller less diverse networks than typically developing peers
• Social networks are a source of support, protection and friendship
• There is a trend toward expanding post-secondary opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities
Literature Review
Social Network: Defined in terms activities a person participates in and the people they connect with in those activitiesCLSC: Career Life Studies Certificate program, 2-year certificate program for students with intellectual disabilities, academic and career instruction
Terminology
Results
Research Question
Discussion Points
Social Network Comparison of College Students with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Undergraduate Peers
Samantha Leonard
% Undergraduate CLSCFamily 15 12Peers 69 60Incidental 5 5Caregiver 0 0Authority 9 23
Number of People in Networks
Number of Activities
Results
Current Focus: • Size and composition of networks
in comparisonFuture: • Use larger sample• Look at variables that predict long
term outcomes• Different types of social networks• Longitudinal analysis
Directions for Future Research
• University of Delaware Undergraduate Research Program
• Stephanie Espie, Graduate Advisor• Laura Eisenman, Faculty Mentor• CLSC Program
Acknowledgements
Undergraduate CLSCAverage 27 20Range 19-32 7-37
Undergraduate CLSCAverage 8 10Range 8-9 7-20
% Undergraduate CLSCEqual 76 63Receive 14 9Give 9 16Mix 0 6Undecided 0 2
% Undergraduate CLSCVery Close 55 44Sort of 33 43Mix 0 6Undecided 12 1
% Undergraduate CLSCWeekly 73 41Monthly 8 10Occasional 11 35Annual 8 14
Related Documents
