Top Banner
Social Influence
36

Social Influence

Feb 22, 2016

Download

Documents

ASTRA

Social Influence. Social Influence. How do we influence each other? How are we affected by pressures to conform and obey, and by group interaction? Class Activity. Ha Ha. Why did you complete (all) those silly requests?. Outline. Conformity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Social Influence

Social Influence

Page 2: Social Influence

Social Influence

How do we influence each other?

How are we affected by pressures to conform and obey, and by group interaction?

Class Activity

Page 3: Social Influence

Ha Ha

Why did you complete (all) those silly requests?

Page 4: Social Influence

Outline

Conformity Conditions that strengthen conformity;

Reasons for conformingObedience

Milgram StudyGroup Influence

Social facilitation; Social Loafing; Deindividuation

Group Interaction Groupthink; Group Polarization

Page 5: Social Influence

Social Influence

Behavior is contagious: giggling, yawning, laughter, tipping generously, smiling …

Some people take advantage of this principle: e.g. Street performers “seed” their tip containers with money

We are often unconscious of this social mimicking. We do it to feel what other people are feeling (empathy).= “the chameleon effect”

Page 6: Social Influence
Page 7: Social Influence

Conformity

Conformity = adjusting our behavior or thinking to bring it into line with some group standard

Asch’s Conformity Experiments (1955) Solomon Asch devised a simple test to

study conformity, and the extent to which people conform to others’ behavior

Page 8: Social Influence

Asch’s Conformity Experiment Imagine you are a participant in the

study…

Page 9: Social Influence
Page 10: Social Influence

Asch’s Conformity Experiment What answer would you give? Be

honest! Do you go with your instinct and risk

being seen as the oddball? Or do you conform to the standard set

by the other participants?

Asch found that over 1/3 of the time, participants were “willing to call white black”

Page 11: Social Influence

Conformity Conditions that strengthen conformity:

One is made to feel incompetent/insecure Group has at least 3 people Group is unanimous One admires the group’s status One has made no prior commitment to any

response Others in the group observe one’s behavior The culture encourages respect for social

standards

Page 12: Social Influence

Activity

Team-Building Activity

Reflection

Page 13: Social Influence

Reasons for Conforming

Frequently, we conform to avoid rejection, or to gain social approval.

Normative Social Influence

We are sensitive to social norms, the understood rules for expected and approved behavior, because the price we pay for being different may be severe!

Page 14: Social Influence

Social Norms Canadian Social Norms:

Apologize for everything Recycle and compost when possible Drive to get most places Watch ice-hockey (Toronto Maple Leafs) on

Saturday nights Stop at the local Tim Hortons for coffee

Activity: With a partner, think of 5 social norms that are

characteristic of Ghana.

Page 15: Social Influence

Reasons for Conforming

Sometimes, we conform because the group may provide valuable information.

Informational Social Influence

When we accept others’ opinions about reality. Only an uncommonly stubborn person will never listen to others.

Page 16: Social Influence

Informational Social InfluenceBaron et al (1996)

Modified the Asch Experiment to see what effect the difficulty and importance of the task had on conformity.

Participants were shown a picture of one person, and were afterwards asked to chose that correct person out of a 4-person lineup.

Page 17: Social Influence

Informational Social Influence Experiment was varied as follows:

Easy: View person for 5 secondsDifficult: View person for ½ secondUnimportant: A preliminary test of

eyewitness id procedures Important: establishing norms for

an actual police procedure.

Page 18: Social Influence

Results

Page 19: Social Influence

Informational Social InfluenceTherefore:

When we are unsure of what is right, and when being right matters, we become more receptive to others’ opinions

Page 20: Social Influence

Obedience

Milgram’s Obedience Studies (1965, 1974)

Page 21: Social Influence

Milgram’s Obedience Studies

Page 22: Social Influence

Milgram’s Obedience Studies Imagine you are the teacher. At what voltage

would you stop shocking the learner?

Imagine you were the learner, and one of your classmates was the teacher. At what point do you think your classmate would stop shocking you?

What % (if any) of the participants went all the way to the end?

Page 23: Social Influence
Page 24: Social Influence

Milgram’s Obedience Studies

Video:

Page 25: Social Influence

Milgram’s Obedience Studies Results:

63% of the participants fully complied with the instructions, all the way to the final 450-volt switch!

Further experiments revealed that obedience in his study varied from 0 to 93% according to certain factors:

Page 26: Social Influence

Obedience

Obedience was highest when: Person giving orders is close at hand,

and perceived to be a legitimate authority figure

Authority figure represents a prestigious institution

Victim was depersonalized or at a distance

There were no role models for defiance

Page 27: Social Influence

Obedience

Why was Milgram so motivated to investigate the power of authority figures and obedience? (to the point of conducting these controversial experiments)

The Holocaust of WWII, and genocide.

Page 28: Social Influence

Obedience

“The most fundamental lesson of our study is that ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process”

Evil does not require monstrous characters; all it takes is ordinary people corrupted by an evil situation.

Page 29: Social Influence

Discussion

Is a soldier to blame for shooting another if he/she is following a general’s orders?

Is an employee to blame for following orders to design, produce and market harmful chemical products?

etc…

Page 30: Social Influence

Group Influence

Social Facilitation:

In the presence of others, an individual: performs better at a task that is already

well-learned. Performs worse at a task that is normally

difficult.

Page 31: Social Influence
Page 32: Social Influence

Group Influence

Social Loafing:

Ingham et al (1974) Blind-folded participants and told them to

pull as hard as they could on a rope. Participants were fooled into believing other people were also pulling.

Exerted only 82% as much as effort as when they thought they were pulling alone.

Page 33: Social Influence

Group Influence

Social Loafing: The tendency for people in a group to exert less effort when pooling their efforts towards attaining a common goal

Deindividuation: the loss of self-awareness and self-restraint occurring in a group situations that foster arousal and provide anonymity (mob behavior).

Page 34: Social Influence
Page 35: Social Influence

Group Interaction

Group Polarization: The enhancement of a groups

prevailing attitudes through discussion within the group.

In other words, if like-minded people get together, a discussion will strengthen their attitude towards an issue they already agree on

Page 36: Social Influence

Group Interaction

Groupthink:

The mode of thinking that occurs when the desire for harmony within the group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives.