Top Banner
Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois
35
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Social Impact of Technologies in Education

Chip Bruce

University of Illinois

Page 2: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Laws

• Moore: # transistors/chip doubles every two years

• Metcalfe: network value increases as the (# users) 2

Page 3: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Pivot Points

• Digital libraries

• Multimedia

• Collaboration systems

• Ubiquitous computing

• Tools for lifelong learning

Page 4: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

In the Future Already

X-Files: on-line forum to discuss show’s direction

Science fiction itself has remained the same. We have caught up to it...We are a science-fiction generation.

–Ray Bradbury

We can’t think far enough ahead anymore.

–Ron Shusett

Page 5: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Opportunity: Digital Libraries

• Learning challenges: integrating knowledge from multiple sources; finding information

• Social challenges: reliability of information; hate sites, etc.; access

• Add’l learning challenges:; integrating knowledge; learning how to find problems

Page 6: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Electronic Communication

• 5,000 electronic journals

• 100,000,000 web users

• Net traffic measured in terabytes

• => 100,000 War & Peace/day

• E-mail communities

• MOOs, MUDs

Page 7: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Kenya

• “my grandmother in Kenya”

• ATT leaves out continent

• windup radio

Page 8: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Opportunity: Multimedia

• Learning challenges: new representations of knowledge; visualization; new skills (Sheldrake); inquiry-based learning

• Social challenges: loss of common knowledge; corporatization; reification of dominance

• Add’l learning challenges: meta-knowledge; reflective understanding

Page 9: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Reification of Dominance “well-trodden battle-lines of social conflict”

• access to tools & information

• construction of disability

• ascii

• netiquette

• desktop metaphors

• web architecture

• domain name system

Page 10: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Opportunity: Collaboration

• Learning challenges: new ways to work together to solve problems; understanding the perspective of others; using new tools

• Social challenges: plagiarism; ownership; inclusion/exclusion

• Add’l learning challenges:social understanding

Page 11: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Opportunity: Ubiquitous Computing

• Learning challenges: understanding hybrids; new ways to explore the world

• Social challenges: surveillance; control; deskilling society

• Add’l learning challenges: reading technology/reading the world

Page 12: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Surveillance

• The road to freedom via a two-way Information Highway may turn into a one-way Surveillance Street, used to condition people’s thoughts and control their behavior.

• – Crawford,1994• Video surveillance is now so ubiquitous that we’re

on television more than we watch it.• CSCW research (program committee)

Page 13: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Opportunity: Lifelong Learning

• Learning challenges: new frames for learning, neither time- nor space-bound; learning how to learn

• Social challenges: new roles for teachers, forms of accreditation, learning institutions, etc.

• Add’l learning challenges: self-direction

Page 14: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Pivot Points

• Digital libraries

• Multimedia

• Collaboration systems

• Ubiquitous computing

• Tools for lifelong learning

Page 15: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Classroom Realities

• Power strips stolen!

• 50% typewriters broken

• An Apple II on the info. superhighway

• “Haven’t used it yet this year”

Page 16: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Alternate Realizations

Idealization

A

B

C

D

E

Page 17: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Separate Spheres?

We are taught to view the political and the technological as separate spheres, the former having to do with values, ideology, power, and the like, the latter having to do with physical artifacts exempt from such vagaries of social life.

–L. Suchman (1988)

Page 18: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Technology as Social Practice

• Construct technologies out of social values & practices (Akrich; Bromley; Selfe; Spender)

• Conceive technologies in terms of our socially-constructed views of reality (Turkle)

• Construct ourselves through technologies (Haraway; Kramarae)

Page 19: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Closing

• Dramatic changes in educational practices

• More democracy, liberatory education?

• Technologies alone do not produce change

• Need to understand & shape these changes

• Call for dialogue

Page 20: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Return to Basic Questions

• What is literacy? How does it develop?

• What is its relation to schooling and life?

• What is learning?

• What is teaching?

• What does it mean to be human?

Page 21: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Possible Consequences

• Information as a commodity

• Reification of dominance

• Hybridization

• Virtual reality

Page 22: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Smart Highways

• Video scanners for electronic tags, radio transponders

• Help with congestion, parking

• But, monitor movements

• Insurance, legal issues

Page 23: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

The Computer Hybrid

• Like Music Minus One

• Listens, follows, adapts, ...

• New conceptions of practice, performance, music

• Can it be too adaptive?

Page 24: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Opportunity to Learn?

• Prior experiences--computer at home; museum trips; parental support

• Existing practices--pullout programs; classroom experts; social networks

• Multiple ways to learn; learning difficulties--emotional, physical, cognitive

• Second-order--the treatment of difference

Page 25: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Social/Technology Relations

• (1) Tech. + {Social} –> {Social*}

• (2) Tech. + {Social} –> {Social*}

• (3) Tech. + {Social} –> {Social*} –> {Social*.} –> {Social*} –> {Social*} –>

Page 26: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Assumptions about Net Use

• Reliable network • Software updates• Adequate training• Personal accounts• Work on the net• Compatible schedules (cf. the wizard)• Equitable access (cf. Foucault)

Page 27: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Knowledge => Info.

Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate.

–Thoreau, Walden

Deep Blue not programmed to accept draw

Page 28: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Definition of Self

• Barbie & Her Magical House– Visual discrimination: home decorating– Cause/effect: select music– Decision-making: choosing make-up

• Materials-centered

Page 29: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

The Autonomy Myth

• We need to prepare for a strange future.

• We can select specific aspects of new Ts.

• We’re unaffected by T if we choose.

• We can stand apart from Ts.

Page 30: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Mutual Constitution

• Can’t pull the plug; Ts are integral to our social fabric.

• We––– build Ts on social values & practices; – conceive Ts in terms of our socially-

constructed views of reality;– construct ourselves through Ts

Page 31: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Hopes & Realities

• Conflict between hopes and realities• Computer not just a physical device• Sherry Turkle: The Second Self• Computer as text; user as reader• Read as library; museum; telephone; teacher; tool;

partner in inquiry

Page 32: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Theoretical Tools

• Re-creation

• Idealization/Realization

• Situated evaluation

• Hermeneutic circle

• Technology as social practice

Page 33: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Nested Contexts of Technologies

• Devices: Hardware & Software

• Documentation

• Activities

• Training

• Support system

• Perceptions

• Surrounding practices

Page 34: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

China

• Diaoyu BB

• Terminals under glass

• Great Digital Wall

Page 35: Social Impact of Technologies in Education Chip Bruce University of Illinois.

Changes

• Electronic communication: journals, users, terabytes

• Information-driven science, work, education

• Smart devices: embedded systems

• Cyborgs: Vivace, medical