RASMUS, DANIEL 510 ARQUETE AVE.te200 MINEAPOLISMN 55402 USDepartment Justice Executive Oce r Immigraion Review Board of I mmigrtion ppeals Oce of he Clek 5/07 ebrg Pik, S1000 Fas Chchl2204HS/ICice of Chief Couns el - BL2901 etro rive , uite 100 BloomingtonN 55425 Name: YAVSOCCHEA A 089665240 Riders089665241 089665242 089665243 ate of this notice8/13 /2013 Encosd s a copy of the Boad's decision and odein the aboe-rerened case. EnclosMb: PlyRgSinceely, DC w Donna CarCheCerk wkCite as: Socchea Yav, A089 655 240 (BIA Aug. 13, 2013)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
7/27/2019 Socchea Yav, A089 655 240 (BIA Aug. 13, 2013)
U.S Deparent of JusticeExe<utive Oce r Imiaton Revew
Decson of the Board of Imaton Appeals
Fals Church, Virgna 2204
Fies A089 66 40 Boomngon A089 66 4A089 66 4
A089 66 43
In e SOCCHA YAVHOY HA aa Houy HeakVOCH LANG CHACN HOR CHA
N MOAL OCDNGS
AAL
Dae
ON BHAL OF SONDNS D Rasmus sque
ON BHALF OF DHS
CHARG
homas S MadisonAsssan Chef Couse
AUG 3 1
Noce Sec 3a))B) I&N Ac 8 SC § 1a))B)] In e ned Saes n violaon oflaw a espondens)
ALICAION Adjusmen of saus
e espondens appea e Immiaon Judges May 0 decison denying eappcaions adjusmen of saus unde secion 4a) of e Immiaon d Naonay Ac8 SC § 1a) e appea wi be dsmssed
On appea e espondens conend a e Immgaon Judge eed in ndng eead esponden neigibe adjusmen of saus unde secion 4a) of e Ac as anaien bred by secion 4c) of e Ac J a 3) Specicay e Immaon Judgeconcuded a e lead esponden s no ecuded om e ba of secion 4 c) of e Ac
because e does no mee e equeens of secion 4) of e Ac IJ a 3) eespondens dspue e Immaion Judges concuson a e ead esponden engagedn uauoed epoyen a peod eceedng 80 days I e espondenalege a e ead esponden led s appcaon adjusmen of saus wn 8 daysof e epiaon of is R1 saus suc a e was empoyed wou auoaon
In e May 1, 0 decson e Igaon Judge ncluded by eence e po decsonsnd a hbis C D 4B ad A J a ) On May 1 0 e Immaion Judge asoaed e espondens applcaions voun depe Al e eences o eImmaon Judge's decson efe o e Api 1 01 decson uness oewise speced
less t 180 days nd that, even if he dd engage in activities is chch ove 180 dayswithout authoizaton, is activities cannot be categoized as "employment
Nowiding te espondents' asseions on appea, we nd no eason to distb teImiation Jdges decision nding the ead espondent neligibe adjustment of statbed on the eaons cited in he decision (J at 2-3). See 8 CFR § 003(d)(3)(i) (203)de novo eview) Wie the espondents ase that the ead espondent did not engage nunatoized empoyment ove 80 days becase he ed s applcation adjustment ostats within 178 days o his visa expiation we note that the ing o an adusent of stasappcaton does not stop te countng peod of unauthoized empoyment See USCS PolcyMemodum, Applicabili of Section 245) to Certain Employment-Based Austment ofStatus Applications led under Section 245(a) of the Immiation and Nationali Act (NeuldActing Associate Decto, Domestic Opeations, HQDOMO 0/23, July 4, 2008 Rathe adsent of status appict who is empoyed mst demonsate that any and a empoyentae his o he st aw eny is athoized by the USCIS nti the appication is ed andcontinuing unti his o he stas is adjusted See eg. Matter of Duka, 18 &N Dec 282 (BA98) Pust to eguation aien engages n "unauthozed empoyment uless he o seas empoyment authoization om the USCIS See 8 CFR § 274a2(c)(9) Hee te eadespondent does not dispte that e dd not e empoyent autoition wi te SCSntl Juy 30, 2008 (J at 3) The lead espondents visa exped on Augst 3, 2007; teee,the lead espondent woked wthot authoiton amost a yea exceeding the 180day mit(J at 3) See section 245(k) o the Act
Fe, the ead espondent aises on appeal the same aguments ased bee theImmiation Judge egading the ssue o wethe the activites e engaged in om Agust 32007, though July 30, 2008 with hs chc constiute "employent (J at 3) As nd byte Immigation Jdge, te ead espondent admitedy eceived emuneation om is chuc nexcge his wok n te o oom boad d asic necessties (J at 3; Exh 2A)Pust to egaton, "compensation ncudes oom and oad (J at 3) See 8 CFR§ 2142()(1) Fhe even thogh te compensation was not popoonal to the vale o theseces it was neveheess paid in exchange the ead espondents seices (J at 3) SeeMatter of Hall 8 &N Dec 203 (BA 1982); see also Matter of Bennett 19 I&N Dec 2(BA 1984) Thus, the lead espondent is ineigbe adjsent o status (J at 3) Seesection 245(c) o the Act
Finally the ecod eects that te espondents wee each ganted a 60day peiod ofvolntay depae conditoned upon the timey postng of a $500 The ecod aso eects teespondent wee povided al te necessay advisas in ths egad See Mater of Gamero
25 I&N Dec 164 (BA 2010). he espondents have not povided evidence to the Bod thatthey timely ed te equied onds See id Thus, the oad cannot entate the voluntaydepae peods d te Iaton Jdges ateate ode of emoval shall ecome eectiveSee id